Slashdot Mirror


Linux Receives 20th Birthday Video From Microsoft

moonbender writes "The Linux kernel has received birthday wishes from an unexpected direction — a video animation from Microsoft. Quoting The H: 'The video picks up on the strained relationship between Microsoft and Linux by displaying the phrase "Microsoft Vs. Linux" and then showing Tux, the Linux mascot, turning his back on the offer of a birthday cake from Microsoft. After a brief outline of the history between Microsoft and Linux, the video ends with a conciliatory gesture: Tux accepts the birthday cake in his igloo and the video ends with "Happy Birthday" and the editing of the initial phrase to "Microsoft and Linux?' The Linux Foundation has more stuff celebrating the kernel's 20th birthday."

368 comments

  1. Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Linux kernel has received ... from Microsoft.

    Clearly this is an attempt to hide patent-encumbered code inside Linux kernel so that Microsoft can sue later!

    1. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by shentino · · Score: 2

      Connivance.
      Implied license.
      Estoppel by acquiescence.

    2. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by HermMunster · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read this as a slight against Linux. It is disrespect--they go hide in their igloos and eat the cake in secret?

      I think the general philosophy that has clearly been reiterated by the Linux community is there is absolutely no room for trust in Microsoft. They are a convicted monopolist and have called upon everyone to view Linux as a cancer. They continue to use their patents to extort payment from large and small with bogus insubstantiated claims against Linux. They are the company that uses embrace extend extinguish. This animation represents the same underhanded intentions.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    3. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have some cake and chill out dude...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    4. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by HermMunster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Nothing to chill out about. Have a nice day.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    5. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Missing.Matter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm going to hang your post on my wall. Best impersonation of the stereotypical paranoid Linux evangelist I've seen in a while. Bravo.

    6. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 2

      Oh for christ sake. It's not even Linux that Microsoft needs to be worried about, it's Mac OSX and whatever will be next iteration in Apple's desktop computers (they're taking it the iOS route slowly). Macs are starting to get games, it has Steam already too. It has slowly gained desktop marketshare. Linux has pretty much stayed the same for the last 10 years in its desktop marketshare. On servers Windows servers and Linux servers are pretty much 50/50 and Mac has almost no marketshare (yes, Windows really is used in the server world).

      I see it more as a friendly-kind "we've always had our little fights, but we do both have a nice history together" video. Kind of like an old married couple.

    7. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1, Interesting

      IBM is a convicted monopolist, too.

      Many, many companies use embrace/extend/extinguish. Even the GNU project has done that to an extent.

    8. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by molnarcs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think as a conciliatory gesture, Microsoft should stop it's patent extortion practices against users of Linux. In case you were wondering, I'm talking about HTC.

    9. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new. MS spends millions every year creating FUD around Linux, and they've been doing it for over a decade. Perhaps you're forgetting the patents claims against Linux, and the companies they are suing over them, despite not telling the LK developers exactly what is supposedly in infringement.

      MS do nothing without reason.

    10. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      But that cake was a . . . you know what, I'm pretty sure somewhere an innocent kitten will die if I finish that. :P

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    11. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      ...a Trojan horse filled with cyanide pills. Don't eat any.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 1

      I know right? They're suing companies right and left, making billions of dollars and still those LK developers cannot find out what is infringing. If there just were public documents of those court cases... But nooo, Microsoft is paying directly to the Washington and the judges involved that the cases remain top secret. Microsoft won't ever admit this because then everyone would know evil they are. And if they did admit it, they just did it because they're doing something even more evil somewhere else and want to get peoples attention away from that. I'm glad we saw through it!

    13. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by nmb3000 · · Score: 0

      They are a convicted monopolist and have called upon everyone to view Linux as a cancer.

      I assume you're talking about this? A few things to keep in mind:

      This was 10 years ago. A long time.

      Second, if you read the statement in context Ballmer wasn't really referring to Linux as a cancer but the GPL. And, depending on the situation, he is probably right. If you have a proprietary software product and you want to keep it that way (for better or worse), the introduction of a GPL component into it really would be like a "cancer" in the sense that it may force it open in spite of your wishes to the contrary. Whether subversively or accidentally, the outcome is the same. Heck, even The Register points out the vague nature of the inclusion clause.

      So it depends on your point-of-view. If you want to keep a product closed, the GPL is something to be concerned about. If you prefer and encourage open source development, the GPL is a good thing which helps keep people honest. Like most worthwhile things it can be both good and bad at the same time, depending on the circumstances.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    14. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by cpscotti · · Score: 2

      Well.. if that cake's got plenty of sugar the cyanide shouldn't cause much harm. Rasputin knew this a loong time ago!

    15. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Which is why MS is adding official CentOS support to HyperV, which is why an MS employee is president of the C++ standards committee, which is why MS is helping AMD with their opensource framework to make threading easier and cross-platform, which is why MS is offering help for any platform to implement C++AMP, which is what AMD's FUSION framework is based on and AMD is pouring resources into making this fully opensource and MS is helping them do it.

      MS seems to be in a transition right now, only time will tell if they "stay evil"

    16. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 1

      And there are just as many iPhones, Nokia's devices and then those makers which are only popular in Asia. Microsoft has always had a low marketshare in mobile devices. It's not their core business.

      Just because Android uses Linux underneath doesn't mean Linux will gain popular support. Just look at Mac OSX and BSD.

    17. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by bmo · · Score: 2

      Indeed.

      To this day, Microsoft is trying to shake down smartphone vendors using Android for 15 bux per phone "protection" against patent extortion^W lawsuits.

      What patents, you ask? Well, we don't know. The only company that seems to have stood up to this kind of patent shakedown is Google in its battle with Oracle ("We read your patents and found them wanting"). To this day, nobody has a list of those 235 patents that Microsoft owns and that Linux supposedly infringes - hidden behind a wall of NDAs.

      Funny how that works. It's using patents as if they are trade secrets. An abuse of the system if I ever saw one. What is Microsoft so afraid of that it can't point out which patents are supposedly being infringed? Could it be that they are bogus and full of prior-art and obviousness? Likely, or else they wouldn't try to hide them.

      So now we have blatant extortion without the help of a patsy third company (SCO) since Microsoft is no longer under judicial supervision.

      I read the other responses to your post. We now know who some of the Softie shills are on here.

      --
      BMO

      ----------------------Shibboleth line---------------------

      All responses to this message dismissing it as paranoia or not fact based is just shilling for Microsoft, because you know every word of it is true.

    18. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Court documents where cases are settled out of court? Useless. MS only has to prove their case when it goes all the way.

    19. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Linux kernel has received ... from Microsoft.

      Clearly this is an attempt to hide patent-encumbered code inside Linux kernel so that Microsoft can sue later!

      Either that or Microsoft Office for Linux(tm) is coming soon!*

      * MOfL might contain traces of subtile but annoying incompatibilities with Microsoft Office for Windows

    20. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. So far all cases have been settled out-of-court.

    21. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - I like that "Convicted Monopolist"

    22. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. The undertones in the video is extremely profound.

      Microsoft is the big boy is has always been nice. Linux is a child trying to break Microsoft completely out of the blue. Linux is small but plays games to elevate themselves to the same level as Microsoft. Linux can't stand toe to toe with Windows so it has to sneak around in the shadows and only gets to eat what Microsoft gives them.

      Fuck You Microsoft!

    23. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does not do what everyone else does - or at least didn't used to. Microsoft got as big as it did because it got very lucky, IBM fucked up, and they used illegal, frequently unethical practices to maintain and grow. That does not describe most companies. Hell, Microsoft really is a piss poor technology company but that are one of the world's best marketing companies.

      Furthermore Microsoft has a long history of playing nice and the completely fucking over whoever is dumb enough to take them at their word. Don't blink or turn your back on them for a second unless you're a complete idiot.

      In a nut shell, you are both completely ignorant of the topic and extremely nieve.

    24. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by gorzek · · Score: 1

      The way your post is written, it implies a proprietary product can be "accidentally" "infected" by the GPL and be forced to open. This is not true at all, unless your development methodology is just utterly careless and you routinely lift code from other sources or use libraries without bothering to see how they're licensed.

      Microsoft's attitude in all this has been pretty consistent: they love having a wealth of free code out there they can appropriate, modify, close up, and sell. They have little interest in producing any open code of their own, though, and are completely against being forced to do so by any licensing terms (such as those under the GPL.)

      I get why, for mercenary reasons, some people are against the GPL. But it is about as fair as any license could be. Don't want to GPL your product? Don't use GPL'ed code. Why is that so hard?

    25. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really that stupid? iOS and Nokia are getting stomped and Android is accelerating. And, er, Linux is the kernel. If Android has popular support then, by definition, Linux has popular support. Duh.

    26. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Pope · · Score: 1

      The igloo is a lie.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    27. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Android is currently dealing with it's own problems with ever increasing competing versions and code forks, security issues introduced by dodgy integration with company specific add-on modules, and of course the ever growing anxiety caused by patent trolls. MS has already successfully obtained their tax using their patent holdings and I seriously doubt they will be the last company to do so. Apple is in the best position since they still remain in control of their platform and can provide consistency. At one time Apples hardware and software control strategy almost destroyed them when MS targeted cheap commodity hardware for their product offerings. Now things are different and the tables have turned. However don't be surprised when MS starts modifying their product control measures to improve their position. Too many people are counting them out and I think that is a mistake. I am not a MS fanboy by any means. I have never judged a platform by the company who produced it. My sole criteria has always been defining the best tool for the job I am working on. This is really off topic but how come nobody every mentions the fact that MS invested millions of dollars in Apple when they were on the verge of collapsing? Apple re-payed the investment but who has ever heard of a company investing money to keep their primary competitor in business?

    28. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      everyone knows there is no cake!

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    29. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by formfeed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Either that or Microsoft Office for Linux(tm) is coming soon!*

      Seriously, that could happen as an attempt to stick it to Apple.

    30. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by ryscott · · Score: 2

      Either that or Microsoft Office for Linux(tm) is coming soon!*

      * MOfL might contain traces of subtile but annoying incompatibilities with Microsoft Office for Windows

      Sounds exactly like Office for Mac 2011 - filled with incompatibilities that Microsoft never mentions and refuses to acknowledge.

    31. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by bmo · · Score: 1

      >This was 10 years ago. A long time.

      Exactly, and they have not changed their tune at all.

      They backed the SCO case until the end.
      They are /still/ shaking down companies for "sekrit patent dealz" if they use Linux (android).

      Microsoft is not to be trusted. Ever.

      With regards to the GPL, it has to be explained every fucking time to people like you who don't get it. "If you don't like the GPL, don't include GPL code in your project!" Seriously, you make it sound as if GPL actively goes out and "infects" projects. It doesn't. It's developers themselves who want to use a GPLed product as a stepping stone to their own closed software and then get all offended because the GPL is somehow "viral".

      Stop using GPLed code if you don't like the license. It's that bloody simple. Go use BSD or public domain code or pay for a dual license from the author of the GPLed program. Stop being an avaricious lazy ass.

      --
      BMO

    32. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...but we already know: The cake is a lie.

    33. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but most cases never go to court (the only exception I can think of is the FAT32 patent).

      Microsoft's MO is to go to a target company (usually someone who hasn't the money to fight back), show them the patents in question, then 'settle' at a 'discounted' price and tie it all up with an NDA (whereupon violation of said NDA likely results in a higher 'licensing fee').

      Pretty slick work when viewed objectively. Ethically? More like slime.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    34. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read this as a slight against Linux. It is disrespect--they go hide in their igloos and eat the cake in secret?

      I think the general philosophy that has clearly been reiterated by the Linux community is there is absolutely no room for trust in Microsoft. They are a convicted monopolist and have called upon everyone to view Linux as a cancer. They continue to use their patents to extort payment from large and small with bogus insubstantiated claims against Linux. They are the company that uses embrace extend extinguish. This animation represents the same underhanded intentions.

      Also... I heard that Microsoft is named after Bill's junk.

    35. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is currently dealing with it's own problems

      Name a platform that doesn't have problems. What matters is growth and market share. And in that, Android delivers.

      MS has already successfully obtained their tax using their patent holdings

      If MS were to manage to somehow put a tax on every Android device in existence, they will still be in a weaker position than they would have been in had their own products been competitive. It is a losing strategy for the premier software maker in the world to just sit around and collect royalties. Google/HTC/and so on aren't going to just sit around and do nothing, i.e., the issues can and will be coded around.

      Apple is in the best position since they still remain in control of their platform and can provide consistency.

      Thank you for your opinion. We can move on now.

      Too many people are counting them out

      Are you responding to me or just making up a nice strawman to knock down. I never "counted MS out".

      This is really off topic...

      Yes, actually it is.

    36. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I'm having a hard time seeing where the GNU folks do the 'extinguish' portion. Could you present an example, perhaps?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    37. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Unequivocal · · Score: 2

      I would agree with this. Time will tell, but they definitely are changing. I had a chance to meet with a few senior people at MS recently and their attitude as compared to the attitude of people in similar positions at MS I met with 15 years ago is dramatic. They're now all "Aw shucks, we want to do the right thing, how can we help?"

      I also was able to meet with some (middle management) people at Google and their attitude reminded me very strongly of MS's behavior 15 years ago: They don't listen to what others say and what they say often implies: "We're the smartest people on the planet, the world revolves around us, if you don't want to work with us and use our stuff, you're just an idiot."

      So it think I can conclude that Google sees themselves as "winning" the way that MS saw themselves winning in the late 90's.

      So I wouldn't be at all surprised to see MS start incorporating more effective open source interoperability with their stuff now. MS' current existential threat is no longer seen as Linux and GPL/FOSS, it's seen as Google, Apple and Facebook.. (All closed source companies.) Ergo their "new attitude" towards F/OSS.

    38. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by iserlohn · · Score: 2

      You can chill out all you want, but what he said is true.

    39. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I read this as a slight against Linux.

      NO WAY?! A Linux fanboy on slashdot assuming its MS trying to be insulting? I never would have expected that to happen or get modded to the highest level.

      You guys really do need to rejoin reality. You just make yourselves look like assholes all the time with the continual OMG MS IS DOING SOMETHING SNEAKY TO DESTROY LINUX crap. For once in your life turn off the ignorant paranoia and just move on.

      This sort of ignorance and paranoia does the work for Microsoft. They don't have to be assholes, they can be nice to you ... and you'll turn around and make yourself look like an ignorant paranoid asshole for them. You are your own worst enemy, spend less time looking for them in the fields and more time looking for the enemy in the mirror. This childish BS is well past the point of being old.

      Your best response would have been to say 'Thanks MS!', Your next best response would have been to ignore it ... but no ... instead you all act like a bunch of whiney bitches who make it clear that no matter what happens you are going to be an asshole to them. What does the rest of the world see, those of the world who don't have your retarded emotional baggage? They see you acting like a bunch of elementary school sore losers, which in turn makes them have even less interest in Linux.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    40. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      The cake is a Lie...

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    41. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Oh for christ sake. It's not even Linux that Microsoft needs to be worried about, it's Mac OSX and whatever will be next iteration in Apple's desktop computers (they're taking it the iOS route slowly). Macs are starting to get games, it has Steam already too. It has slowly gained desktop marketshare. Linux has pretty much stayed the same for the last 10 years in its desktop marketshare. On servers Windows servers and Linux servers are pretty much 50/50 and Mac has almost no marketshare (yes, Windows really is used in the server world).

      I see it more as a friendly-kind "we've always had our little fights, but we do both have a nice history together" video. Kind of like an old married couple.

      And it's used *VERY* widely in the server world - Exchange, AD, SQL Server: not as widespread as Linux and the various commercial Unix variants, but it is very prevalent. Also, fwiw, as of 2k8 - it doesn't even suck [much].

    42. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      With regards to the GPL, it has to be explained every fucking time to people like you who don't get it.

      Can I suggest you remove your head from your ass and read what I said?

      Whether subversively or accidentally

      In a large software project with dozens of developers how hard is it to imagine one person lifting a library or portion of code from a GPL project -- either because the are lazy, or because they don't understand the rules? Clearly the GPL isn't going around "infecting" things, but an unaware or intentionally malicious developer may still use it. The outcome is the same.

      The GPL doesn't care about intent, only actions.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    43. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      In a large software project with dozens of developers how hard is it to imagine one person lifting a library or portion of code from a GPL project -- either because the are lazy, or because they don't understand the rules?

      If your developers are doing that, you have lousy management.

    44. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they go hide in their igloos and eat the cake in secret?

      That seems pretty accurate to me...

    45. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      did you watch the video? the very first interaction is Microsoft rudely closing the shades and refusing to come out when linux comes by.

    46. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Your analysis is correct. I noticed MS trending that way a few years ago, and like you, I believe it's because the competition has changed dramatically to what it was 15 years ago.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    47. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      in the sense that it may force it open in spite of your wishes to the contrary

      Violating the GPL does not mean the offending code automatically becomes covered by the GPL. In fact the only way that would happen is if the offender offered that as a solution to the problem.

      All a GPL violation means is that the copyright owners can sue the offender for violating the GPL ... that can make a request for what they want done, and the judge can determine if thats acceptable and allow it, or do something entirely different or tell them that while the did violate the GPL, it really didn't do any harm to anyone so all they have to do is remove the GPL code from future versions.

      GPL does not have some sort of 'new and unique' position in the copyright and licensing world that magically lets it do things that no one else can do. The worst that will ever happen is a fine and injunction to stop distribution of the offending code. You're an idiot if you think it'd ever be anymore than that. The GPL will never make a closed source product open, unless the people who own the closed source product decide thats an easier way out than paying a fine and ceasing distribution.

      Linksys or whoever it was may have given the source code out after getting bitched at for GPL violations, but thats simply because the OS isn't the core product, the hardware itself is, and the majority of the software was GPL software, removing GPL'd code from the device would have basically meant rewriting the software completely. That is an entirely different situation from one where say (just for the sake of argument) Adobe used 4 lines of GPLd code in Photoshop. In which case, I'd be completely surprised if they were fined at all, and expect the more likely response to be something like 'take those lines out before you distribute another copy or we'll fine the ever living shit out of you'.

      I do prefer OSS and encourage it, and I also think GPL is a scourge that gives OSS a shitty name because idiots such as yourself care more about manipulating others so you can get at what they have then actually sharing common code and functionality. GPL is for people who want to force their own political agenda on others. Its just a political tool, and its only getting worse as time goes on. If you think GPL is about sharing you are wrong. Copyleft is not about sharing, its about forcing others to do the same thing you do. There are plenty of OSS licenses that are for sharing, copyleft licenses are not among them. Anything that goes out of its way to make itself incompatible with another license and provides no remedy to deal with other licenses that are not in 100% accordance with their own is certainly not trying to be 'shared'.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    48. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      You could easily replace MSFT in your description with IBM, however, they completely changed their business practices, their company culture and their attitudes...

    49. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by peppepz · · Score: 1
      Among the other things, they're patent-trolling any phone manufacturer using Linux, they're planting patented standards at every occasion they get (e.g. exFAT), they poisoned the standardization of ODF, and they paid Nokia to kill MeeGo.

      MS isn't transitioning anywhere, they just have less power than the past, thanks to Linux and the open source community in general (which they saw as "communism" and "cancer"), and thus they can do less evil than they could in the recent past. But they still do what they can.

    50. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You outed yourself as a neckbeard twit when you used the phrase "convicted monopolist".

    51. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      To this day, Microsoft is trying to shake down smartphone vendors using Android for 15 bux per phone "protection" against patent extortion^W lawsuits.

      What patents, you ask? Well, we don't know.

      I found the list and posted it to Slashdot on one of the recent Microsoft vs Motorola stores. It was modded up to +5.

      To this day, nobody has a list of those 235 patents that Microsoft owns and that Linux supposedly infringes - hidden behind a wall of NDAs.

      The source for that is known, too. Basically Ballmer was misrepresenting the results of a study:

      http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Author-of-Linux-Patent-Study-Says-Ballmer-Got-It-Wrong/

    52. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has always had a low marketshare in mobile devices. It's not their core business.

      It's not for lack of trying. WinCE and WinMo have been around for ages, and now they're trying to push WinPhone7 on everyone. MS would love to be dominant in smartphones, but it's just never happened, and I'm sure they're pissed that Apple came out of nowhere with the iPhone and largely took over the market (at least until Android phones caught on), even though their WinMo phones had been on the market for much, much longer.

    53. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      So... what's the solution. GPL code exists, regardless of what you, Microsoft or anybody else thinks of it. So you need to tell your developers not to copy it into your apps (unless it's LGPL, which is fine).

      Are you suggesting the GPL should be outlawed or invalidated? If so, on what grounds? That it encourages people to stupidly use it where they're not allowed?

      And by the way, when such mistakes are made, I think all you have to do is remove the offending code. I don't think anybody's ever been forced to GPL their code because of inadvertent addition of GPL'd stuff.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    54. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of ignorance and paranoia does the work for Microsoft. They don't have to be assholes, they can be nice to you ... and you'll turn around and make yourself look like an ignorant paranoid asshole for them. You are your own worst enemy, spend less time looking for them in the fields and more time looking for the enemy in the mirror. This childish BS is well past the point of being old.

      THIS.

      However crazy Bob's been to his friends in the past, sometimes, it's just a cake.

    55. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 1
      No, the Tom Tom case was just twisted to be an assault against open source. It was never about Linux specifically, it was things that Tom Tom added themself on top of linux.

      http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/02/Microsoft_sues_TomTom_over_patents_in_case_with_Linux_subplot_40305732.html

      Microsoft says open-source software is not the intended focal point of the action. Five of the alleged patent violations relate to proprietary software.

      Microsoft says it filed the case as a last resort, after trying for more than a year to reach an agreement with TomTom.

      Five of the patents in dispute relate to in-car navigation technologies, while the other three involve file-management techniques. Gutierrez said Microsoft has reached licensing agreements with with other in-car navigation vendors over the same patents, and it remains open to "quickly resolving" the TomTom dispute through licensing.

      But this being Slashdot, of course Microsoft is out there trying to destroy Linux. That is why they are attacking companies like Red Hat and Canonical all the time!

    56. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Second, if you read the statement in context Ballmer wasn't really referring to Linux as a cancer but the GPL. And, depending on the situation, he is probably right. If you have a proprietary software product and you want to keep it that way (for better or worse), the introduction of a GPL component into it really would be like a "cancer" in the sense that it may force it open in spite of your wishes to the contrary.

      What's the problem there? If you don't like it, don't copy/steal the code.

      What exactly do you think would happen if you had a proprietary software product, and then you introduced a component into it which was not only proprietary, but belonged to your competitor? (i.e., you somehow got access to your competitor's source code and copied part of it into your product.) The results would probably be much worse than simply being forced to either remove the component, or open-source your product: you'd get a giant fine, jail time for your executives, the company would be forcibly shut down, etc.

    57. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS is getting stomped? Android activations do outnumber iPhones (by a fair margin, I'd imagine, but I haven't looked it up), but Apple just posted its highest quarterly revenue ever. You make it sound like they're going bankrupt, when that couldn't be farther from the truth.

    58. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by LibRT · · Score: 1

      re: your sig: you can apply for Canadian citizenship here: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/citizenship/index.asp

    59. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Tamran · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe the cake is an analogy for Mono ... and you might be right that it's a trap.

    60. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      So Linux is a pale "beech tree forest" (what faget means in Romanian as it is not an English word) that has allergies and bleeds uncontrollably? Thanks for the heads up...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    61. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Office for Windows does with prior versions of itself?

    62. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how come nobody every mentions the fact that MS invested millions of dollars in Apple when they were on the verge of collapsing?

      People do sometimes mention it, but ideally with a little more context. I'm glad that investment was made. Vista was a piece of shit by any measure, but Windows 7 is not as easily dismissed. The QAs for Excel for Mac 2008 and 2011 should be shot, but that's another discussion.

      Why did Microsoft invest $150 USD? I don't know for certain. I am pretty sure though that altruism didn't play much of a role in the decision.

      Microsoft was having anti-trust issues. It surely did them no harm to be seen supporting a competing platform, and committing to keeping MS Office on the Mac. Canceling the latter would have at the time not reflected well on them as the loss of Office would have seriously harmed the ability of people to adopt Macs. I know because my employer at the time was too cheap to buy it, so I used Claris Works as best I could with Dataviz translators. That was not a serious solution for professional communication with Window's based Office users - at least not for Excel sheets with macros or any serious level of complexity. Looking at today, Numbers is a great application, but it's lacking features that some business users rely upon. I couldn't easily afford to lose the ability to run Office, even though I curse Excel on a daily basis for its instability and general lack of QA.

      They had cross-licensing deals concluded and an agreement to make IE the default browser. Hardly sounds like MS just rode-up armed with a flask of soup and a bag of money for the less fortunate.

      Apple re-payed the investment but who has ever heard of a company investing money to keep their primary competitor in business?

      Using the word "re-payed" makes it sound as if the investment were a loan. There was nothing to repay! Microsoft bought stock which appreciated at a handsome rate. At the time Microsoft's primary competitor was in a pretty poor state. Education and publishing were still good for Apple, but in general marketshare and general recognition was poor. I remember back then if I was looking for a new Mac I'd have to find one of the specialist stores in London, and software was typically bought via magazine adverts. One of the larger games stores in the area still had an Amiga section, albeit not for much longer, yet the only Mac stuff to be found was on hybrid discs. It was probably better in America where Apple still had a decent position in education, but in Europe it seemed barely anyone had ever seen a Mac.

      Apple is not what it was back at the time of the investment. It pre-dated Mac OS 8 (if memory serves) and G3s. iMacs came in 98 or 99, and the iPod certainly didn't pick-up steam until USB and Windows support came. Apple was the primary competitor in the sense that a guy with a bathtub and a beer recipe could be the primary competitor to Carlsberg if no-one else knew how to brew beer.

    63. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time there was a much larger market for compilers than there is today. To a very large extent gcc has sucked the air out of the room. Even clang, its relatively new Free Software competition has to support a lot of gcc-isms, because quite a bit of real life software these days assumes it is going to be compiled by gcc.

      This doesn't seem nearly as bad as what Microsoft tends to do to, because it comes complete with source code, and the incompatibilities are *probably* not intentional, as Microsoft's failures to follow standards typical are. Still, there certainly are cases where GNU software uses its market share to help it compete.

    64. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      I also think GPL is a scourge that gives OSS a shitty name because idiots such as yourself care more about manipulating others so you can get at what they have then actually sharing common code and functionality.

      Okay, now I'm really confused. Several people, you included, seem to have inferred that my original post was saying "I want to use GPL code in my product without paying the associated dues." Where exactly did I write this? Heck, it wasn't even from a personal standpoint, I was just trying to be objective about it.

      I personally like the "share and share alike" concept behind the GPL and have both used and released code under it. However, I can also see where a managerial type like Ballmer is coming from when he looks at it from Microsoft's behemoth codebase in his mind. Is it really so hard for Slashdot commentators to see both sides?

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    65. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time there was a much larger market for compilers than there is today.

      Whatever happened to Brett Glass? He used to post hilarious rants on Slashdot about how unfair it was that he couldn't write compilers for a living thanks to GCC. Think I must be getting old, missing the Slashdot of yesteryear.

    66. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      Given that Linux provides the basis for Android and WebOS, I think that you're missing some of Microsoft's worries.

    67. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Coincidentally, the phoneme "mofl" reminds me of the sound someone might make while having something rammed down their throat.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    68. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      What? Did you expect Tux to go to Bill's house on his birthday? How else could it have worked? Of course Bill had to go to Tux to give him his cake, and of course as Tux doesn't particularly like Bill, takes his cake away from Bill. It's no slight.

    69. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the "Halloween" reference.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    70. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      1) HTC != "Linux"
      2) I find it hard to blame a company for doing what every other company is doing in order to keep competitive.

      Blame the broken system rather than the companies who take advantage of what they're given.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    71. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      nobody has a list of those 235 patents that Microsoft owns and that Linux supposedly infringes

      Sometime back I read a posting of what people believed to be the likely offending patents - on Groklaw?! Sorry been a while. Of those, all but a dozen were immediately thrown out either because they really didn't apply, prior art was extremely obvious, or it was believed there was an extremely high likelihood the patent would be thrown out or not applicable if put to the test. Of what remained, the majority was believed at the time were probably were not valid patents but it would prove to be extremely expensive to put that to the test. And then finally, what remained of those were only a couple of patents whereby some argued they had teeth and others yet argued they likely didn't, but would be expensive to argue.

      So in a nutshell, of that 235, likely less than a half dozen or so might keep anyone up at night. And of those, only a tiny fraction or likely of any serious concern. But of course, it only requires one to sink its teeth in.

    72. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      >>To a very large extent gcc has sucked the air out of the room

      Yes, but why or how? Was it designed to kill off the other compliers? Did the gcc folks make any efforts to destroy complier companies or their compilers?

      >>Still, there certainly are cases where GNU software uses its market share to help it compete.

      Cite, please? I don't think this is the case with compilers, which you brought up as an example. I am just wondering if you have any other examples, or if you can provide more details on how gcc used it's market share to force other compiler makers out of business.

      Regards.

    73. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      That sounds like something the kind of socially maladjusted person who would eat a cake alone in an igloo would say. :P

    74. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Either that or Microsoft Office for Linux(tm) is coming soon!*

      Makes me think of an interview I saw with Linus many years ago talking about what he was trying to do, which was make an alternative open OS. The interviewer asked him what he would think if Microsoft came out with an Office for Linux edition. Linus said "If Microsoft ever does applications for Linux it means I've won."

    75. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      You're mostly correct. You can't be forced to open your code. You have two options, you accept the terms of the GPL (and open your code) or you don't, if you don't what you have done is copyright infringement and you can be sued under copyright law. No law (in any countries I'm aware of) allows a judge to force you to give up your code, you will end up paying damages and have to stop using the infringing code, same as with any other copyright infringement.

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    76. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      ok, just how it is a trap?

      if you use 2.0 and only assemblies that are covered by promise, they can't touch you. there is a holly shitload of assemblies that depend on free parts only like gtk-sharp, gst-sharp and so on. so, if you were mad and used parts not covered by promise it wasn't a trap you failed into, it is just you being fool who can't read.

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    77. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Didn't pay much attention to the results of our last election, did you?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    78. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 1

      This sort of ignorance and paranoia does the work for Microsoft. They don't have to be assholes, they can be nice to you ... and you'll turn around and make yourself look like an ignorant paranoid asshole for them. You are your own worst enemy, spend less time looking for them in the fields and more time looking for the enemy in the mirror. This childish BS is well past the point of being old.

      One of the most insightful comments on slashdot.

    79. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Microsoft only extinguishes competition in that its products become ubiquitous. You can still purchase WordPerfect, but if you send people WordPerfect files, you are likely to get complaints. The exact same thing when Free Software projects become ubiquitous, alternatives start to become somewhat unworkable due to network effects.

      Now, it certainly is true that Microsoft is unique in that it actively tries to subvert and sabotage standards, and Free Software doesn't generally do this, but there are cases where Free Software deliberately breaks standards compatibility. For an amusing example google the case of df and du and POSIX_ME_HARDER. I am not sure what df or du output on Solaris or another commercial UNIX but I would be surprised if they used 512 byte blocks, whatever Posix might specify. I wouldn't know though. I primarily use Linux.

    80. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      You trust IBM, since they are unconvinced monopoly, where do you think Microsoft learned it dirty tricks from?? All IBM had was better lawyers than Microsoft...

    81. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      By design or not, the GCC has many non-standard compiler extensions. People write code that they assume is cross-platform, but later discover will only compile on GCC.

      "Oh well, hardly anybody was building the Irix port anyway."

      "Irix won't run Gnuwidgiwidt? I guess there's no point in maintaining those servers."

      I am being hypothetical, and the non-standard extensions in GCC were not deliberately introduced. But the end result is about the same as what Microsoft ended up doing with J++.

    82. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      It would appear that Brett Glass is running lariat.net. I sort of miss him too.

      That being the case, gcc is a good case of a Free Software project becoming ubiquitous enough that it begins to extinguish the chances of other projects--even other Free Software projects. Likewise Linux itself makes it difficult for other Free Software kernels, and GNU makes it difficult to write a non-Posix userspace.

    83. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I think you're reading too much into it. Your knee-jerk reaction to how Linux is portrayed in this video is exactly why big companies can't do anything creative or interesting without people coming out of the woodwork to feign being offended.

      I work in the commercial animation industry and there's a high likelihood that this video was thought of by an ad exec who has Microsoft as a client. The ad agency hired an outside commercial house to do the production work. I doubt anyone high enough at Microsoft even cared about this production to be in the development phase for it and just signed off on it after all was said and done.

      There wasn't a large psychological study created to find the best way to get their message of Linux subversion out through this Trojan horse. It was just a couple of designers and creatives going "let's make the penguin cuter... Give him an igloo."

      Big clients like Microsoft are the worst because the ad agency and the client are so scared of upsetting anybody that they end up with really generic concepts much like this video. Even then it's obviously not enough to keep people like you from being offended.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    84. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by LibRT · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, about Canada's last election makes you think Canada has become a nation about to go bankrupt (which is what the OP's sig refers to)? The NDP may have made some gains via protest votes in Quebec, but they don't have their hands anywhere near the levers of power, so there's no real threat of bankrupting Canada...

    85. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Except for the small matter of the party pushing for the same kind of supply-side, tax-cuts-for-every-problem economics that's tanking the US getting a majority government.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    86. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      It used to be that the embedded marketplace was full of odd hardware with its own oddball C compiler. These days you wouldn't touch a platform with a ten foot pole that didn't have a port of gcc. Likewise, there was a time, back when Posix was fairly new, when it was not clear that Posix was going to become an important standard. Part of the reason that it succeeded was that GNU decided to emulate it. However, it did not do so slavishly. For interesting reading Google for POSIX_ME_HARDER, for some examples of cases where GNU software is not Posix-compatible on purpose.

      I do agree that the Free Software people are not trying to be mean, but the exact same things happen when Free Software becomes ubiquitous as when proprietary software becomes ubiquitous. Alternative software that does mostly the same thing gets crowded out of the market.

      Linux's success makes it hard for the BSDs to gain traction. GNU's implementation of Posix tools makes it hard for non-Posix systems to gain traction, etc.

    87. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by GlassHeart · · Score: 1

      Blame the broken system rather than the companies who take advantage of what they're given.

      Well, these are powerful companies that either helped draft those laws, or are not doing much to fix it...

    88. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      So, you're blaming gcc for having "non-standard" extensions?

      To, presumably other compiler writers, who can write their own if they wish?

      So, your first culprit should be other compiler writers, for not supporting versions of these extensions, if so many people want to use the extensions with other compilers.

      And then, you also blame gcc for widget makers who *also* wont recode to compiler independent formats.

      No, I don't think so.

      The end result occurred because gcc was good enough, and has had competition to become better (even from within the codebase).

      >> But the end result is about the same as what Microsoft ended up doing with J++.

      Really? As far as I know, J++ is not very widely used, while gcc is. So, it can hardly be claimed that this is true or both would have the same fate in the marketplace.

      In fact, one might expect Microsoft J++ to have more market share than gcc if they are using the same strategies, since they have much more weight to leverage things.

      On the other hand, you could be talking of some other type of 'end result', so please elucidate if that is the case.

      Regards.

    89. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by zget · · Score: 2

      So you picked up the part where tux takes the cake and enjoys it in his cave. In your hatred you assumed this is MS saying linux users go hide in their cave and eat the cake in secret. Did it ever cross your mind that maybe, just maybe it means putting behind the past and getting closer to working together, helping each other and making the systems compatible.

      Hell, the video starts with MS guy closing the blinds and ignoring tux. After that comes halloween 1998 reference where MS guy tries to scare tux away. It's so clear message of MS admitting that they've done things wrong in the past that even blinds could see it.

      And still, from ALL OF THIS you picked up "tux takes the cake and goes to hide in cave?"

    90. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      >>It used to be that the embedded marketplace was full of odd hardware with its own oddball C compiler.

      This is not better, in my opinion.

      >> Alternative software that does mostly the same thing gets crowded out of the market.

      Especially *software that you have to pay for*. But I don't think that's a bad thing either.

      >>Linux's success makes it hard for the BSDs to gain traction.

      Yes, power laws applies to software projects, too. I'm sorry that's the case, but how do you propose to mitigate one of the fundamental observations of the 90's? Both developers and installs will track 'teh hotness'.

      But, this also actually ensures there *will be* BSD developers, as it is a smaller, yet stable strange attractor, so to say.

      Regards.

    91. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      But then their mobile division wouldn't make any money :P

    92. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee you'll read way too much into something just to justify your hatred of MS. The fact is FOSS advocates need MS, without them they'd be resigned to actually developing good software and practicing what they preach, they need a bad guy!

    93. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by LibRT · · Score: 2

      I'd get into it with you, but I'm getting rather exhausted discussing these types of issues with people missing a fundamental understanding of economics. Suffice it to say: Canada has been systematically reducing its various tax rates and cutting government services since the mid-90s. The consequences? GDP grew. Tax revenues increased. Unemployment went from 12% to 6%. The dollar went from being worth $0.67 USD to about $1.04 USD. Government deficits were eliminated (until recent economic downturn) and the country ran surpluses. Government debt as a percentage of GDP went from 70% at its peak in 1995 (about where the US is today) to about 22% (pre-downturn - it's now around 31%). You really need to stop equating tax rate with tax revenue, and also take into consideration the demonstrable fact that higher tax = less productivity and less innovation and less capital for the private sector (you know, the sector that produces jobs and prosperity)...

    94. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Lobbyists! And IBM is so entrenched in US government, that if tomorrow they stop selling their 20 y/o software on 5.25" floppies half of US government institutions would stop!

    95. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would buy office for my Linux box... Just saying.

    96. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by cavreader · · Score: 1

      "Name a platform that doesn't have problems" I never claimed this. MS still maintains a large market share for the desktop and a significant number of other products tied to their infrastrure platforms. Although I have it on good advice that next year the Linux desktop will finally claim the top position. It should also not be surprising that they have lost market share because there are more alternatives available but each company is not only competing solely with MS but also with everyone else which means everyone gets a smaller piece of the pie. Personally I really don't give a shit about any of this because because as I originally stated I have never judged a particular technology on who produced it. I have earned a good living using IBM, Borland, Sun, Oracle, Redhat, MS, Apple, Motorola, AT&T, and a host of other companies technologies to build systems and applications over the past 25 years. "Thank you for your opinion. We can move on now." I'm sorry for offering an opinion on a forum built for that specific purpose. "Are you responding to me or just making up a nice straw-man to knock down. I never "counted MS out". No

    97. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps GP lives in a cave?

    98. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by another_twilight · · Score: 0

      This sort of ignorance and paranoia does the work for Microsoft. They don't have to be assholes, they can be nice to you ... and you'll turn around and make yourself look like an ignorant paranoid asshole for them. You are your own worst enemy, spend less time looking for them in the fields and more time looking for the enemy in the mirror. This childish BS is well past the point of being old.

      One of the 'tricks' of abusers in abusive relationships is to 'play nice' when people are watching. The abused either comes across looking like an "ignorant paranoid asshole" or is forced to 'play along'.

      Microsoft's behaviour in a number of arenas has been abusive. When there has been substantial evidence of a change in culture and direction away from these methods, then you can start accusing people of being "whiny bitches". Until then, an animated happy birthday hardly cuts it.

    99. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have some cake and chill out dude...

      In the igloo?

    100. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slight? It shows Linux as being accepting. Tux brings the cake into his home. My heavens. Stop being so paranoid.

    101. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      this is unbelievably paranoid.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    102. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      The way your post is written, it implies a proprietary product can be "accidentally" "infected" by the GPL and be forced to open. This is not true at all, unless your development methodology is just utterly careless and you routinely lift code from other sources or use libraries without bothering to see how they're licensed.

      Microsoft's attitude in all this has been pretty consistent: they love having a wealth of free code out there they can appropriate, modify, close up, and sell. They have little interest in producing any open code of their own, though, and are completely against being forced to do so by any licensing terms (such as those under the GPL.)

      I get why, for mercenary reasons, some people are against the GPL. But it is about as fair as any license could be. Don't want to GPL your product? Don't use GPL'ed code. Why is that so hard?

      so if i use a gpl'd library, my code is forced to conform to gpl? that is fucked up. using someone else's library is very different from using someone else's code.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    103. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      but i doubt they've release code under GPL. and so they're not cancer?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    104. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux kernel has received ... from Microsoft.

      Clearly this is an attempt to hide patent-encumbered code inside Linux kernel so that Microsoft can sue later!

      Oh screw off.

    105. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because HermMunster is a whiny little kid.

    106. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by molnarcs · · Score: 1

      1) HTC != "Linux"

      Where the hell did I say HTC=Linux?! HTC uses linux (via Android), and I said linux users

      2) I find it hard to blame a company for doing what every other company is doing in order to keep competitive.

      Blame the broken system rather than the companies who take advantage of what they're given.

      Not every other company (unless you meant 50% of all companies). You have Microsost, Apple, Oracle, the patent trolls. And then there are companies who don't wage the IP war waving ridiculous software patents. Google is a good example for the latter.

    107. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by risom · · Score: 1

      Google "LGPL".

    108. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If MS capitulated like that, what further barrier to Linux-on-the-desktop would there be? With Linux as a viable desktop replacement, what need would anyone have for Windows?

    109. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chill out"? Slashdot is creeping towards idiocy with you and your mods' help. Why does such a one liner post get such a high insightful marking on it? Especially when it's on the side of "just get over it" with all the damage Microsoft has caused in the past?

      Fucking shills.

    110. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Right, because Microsoft making $15 per android phone by blackmailing phone manufacturers with non-existent linux patents is REALLY helping linux users forget what jack-asses they are so we can put it all behind us...

    111. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge corporations such as Microsoft are like the mythical Hydra - 9 heads, each one capable of sending a different message.
      So to the one head - thanks for the cake! To the others - I've still got my eyes on you!

    112. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by digitect · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful, mod parent up.

      This is EXACTLY why Microsoft might befriend Linux and Free Software. The cloud represents a new, closed frontier, and they need a partner.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    113. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! by mgsmith7475 · · Score: 1

      And it's used *VERY* widely in the server world - Exchange, AD, SQL Server: not as widespread as Linux and the various commercial Unix variants, but it is very prevalent. Also, fwiw, as of 2k8 - it doesn't even suck [much]. You sound unsure! SQL Server works just fine for smaller applications, NOT Enterprise level! AD works well for ILM. Exchange offers a TON of ammenties, however is and always has been a high level risk for Email Security. Okay, fine bring in a third party email proxy, you still have a cheesy OS that needs to rebooted often.

  2. Oblig: The cake is a lie by Paul+Rose · · Score: 2, Funny

    n/m

    1. Re:Oblig: The cake is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no puppies either...

    2. Re:Oblig: The cake is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the first time in the existence of that goddamned meme, it may actually, FINALLY be appropriate here.

    3. Re:Oblig: The cake is a lie by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2

      Second time. Recall IE Team send Firefox a cake.

    4. Re:Oblig: The cake is a lie by Locutus · · Score: 1

      the cake is real, it's just a bomb.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:Oblig: The cake is a lie by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      and look what it did to firefox!

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  3. Still part of the "Embrace" mode by DragonFodder · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Don't trust the M$ any farther than you can throw them.

    In other words "Its a trap!" - AA

    --
    Wherever you go... There you are. B.B.
    1. Re:Still part of the "Embrace" mode by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, just how far can you throw a cake?

  4. The world as we know it is about to end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    First Duke Nukem forever, then GNU/Hurd, now this.
    2012, here we come.

    1. Re:The world as we know it is about to end. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the BSD mascot is complaining it's getting mighty cold in his home.

      (yes, I know... but it's as close as it gets, bear it for this joke, dear BSD enthusiasts)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:The world as we know it is about to end. by sim82 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget c++0x and the Chevy volt!

    3. Re:The world as we know it is about to end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the world as we know it will end until the year of the Linux desktop.

  5. After the credits... by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    You missed the ending, where the cake explodes, destroying the igloo and penguin.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:After the credits... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      ...in the background, with a slo-mo shot of Bill Gates strutting defiantly in the foreground towards the camera with a hip pop metal track blaring from your speakers.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:After the credits... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      ... Then a Hurd of Wildebeasts tramples across the scene, leveling everything and a huge terminal looms into view displaying light-on-dark mono-spaced lettering:
      Because: GPLv3 > GPLv2; You twits.

    3. Re:After the credits... by tokul · · Score: 1

      You missed the ending, where the cake explodes, destroying the igloo and penguin.

      Penguin was already dead before explosion. Polonium poisoning.

    4. Re:After the credits... by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      That's called an encore, for which MS was quickly sued for copyright infringement from Starz Entertainment, LLC for infringing on their ENCORE and ENCORE on demand service.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    5. Re:After the credits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the ending of a spy vs spy comic.

    6. Re:After the credits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought of something more sleasy and inconspicuous like poison, it seemed more M$'ish.

    7. Re:After the credits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the cake contain common explosive called ACPI?

    8. Re:After the credits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Bill... cool guys don't look at explosions.

    9. Re:After the credits... by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't that be a Hurd of GNUs?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:After the credits... by barzam · · Score: 1

      I seriously thought the candle on the cake was going to cause the igloo to melt..

    11. Re:After the credits... by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Actually, you needed a proprietary knife and fork to eat the cake, so the penguin just took the cake inside to reverse engineer it so their own knife and fork could be used. And then it exploded.

    12. Re:After the credits... by sustik · · Score: 1

      Reading a lot of classics lately?

    13. Re:After the credits... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I thought of something more sleasy and inconspicuous like poison, it seemed more M$'ish.

      Embrace and distend?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:After the credits... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I've never hurd of gnus. What's a gnu?

      --
      Be relentless!
    15. Re:After the credits... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      its another goddamn animal! what is it with open source and animals?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    16. Re:After the credits... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      They did that, but that part's only available on the private version of their video.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  6. Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cake is a lie.

  7. Microsoft and Open Source in General by RazzleFrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the way the Apple juggernaut has been steamrolling it would make sense to me for Microsoft and Open Source in general to find a way of co-existing. Say what you want about Microsoft, but Apple's heavy-handed, strict controls and policies makes Microsoft look like a pussy cat in comparison.

    1. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not.

      Ever.

      Trust.

      Them.

      Never Microsoft.

    2. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2

      With the way the Apple juggernaut has been steamrolling it would make sense to me for Microsoft and Open Source in general to find a way of co-existing.

      I think that people within Microsoft are actually very appreciative of Open Source and of Apple in the sense that those other OSes are doing cool stuff, which pushes everyone to do better and 'one-up' the others. This pushes creativity within the OS and interoperability between the OSes in general. In the end, we all like to hate Microsoft or Apple or Linux or BSD because they are not our personal favorite and they are faceless monoliths. It's a lot tougher to hate another programmer or designer just because they draw a paycheque from another company. Personally I am not a fan of Microsoft due to them hamstringing their lower grade products (Home edition missing RDP, easy network control, etc) and making the OS much less functional then my Linux boxen, but I am glad they are around and I wouldn't hold it against anyone who worked for them.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    3. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by christurkel · · Score: 2

      Ya! Just like MS! Apple it's Java implementation had Mac OS X specific extensions...umm...they integrated Safari into the OS and claimed it could be removed...ummm...Apple crushed compteting OS makers with illegal antitrust actions...ummm....no. Nice try though.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    4. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by ThorGod · · Score: 2

      I want to agree with you, but Mac OS X is still unix-based and plays better with my FreeBSD server than windows would, so I can't...

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    5. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but looking at MS for an ally... it kinda reminds me of the alliance between Voyager and the Borg to fight the bigger evil.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it would make sense to me for Microsoft and Open Source in general to find a way of co-existing.

      Microsoft has decided they have found that way: patent royalties. A Linux programmer paid by someone else writes the code, and Microsoft receives revenue from someone else's work (while simultaneously creating a deterrent for others in the same industry).

      All the software industry needs, is roll over and accept that programmers (and their customers) can never be free.

      Problem solved.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      What other OS makers were crushed by Microsoft exactly?

      And is integrating IE much different than requiring iTunes for everything you do? How's IE doing nowadays anyway?

      Apple doesn't commit the same crimes against freedom that Microsoft does but that doesn't make them innocent.

      To the guy who said - Don't trust Microsoft - don't trust ANY company. This isn't about trust - it's more about using each other. Look how much the formerly evil IBM did for Linux?

    8. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Um. Yeah. Apple takes KHTML, turns it into something called WebKit, makes it work well as Safari, then re-releases it as Open Source WebKit. That's heavy handed alright.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    9. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft would like nothing more than to sit on an existing product for years with little to nothing in the way of innovation - see the encumberence that is IE6 for evidence of this in the wild. The fact that they're being forced to do better because there are alternatives probably isn't their choice at all, but it's the situation they find themselves in and they're trying to make the best of it. Given the choice of eliminating OSX/Linux and just selling Win7 clones to people for the next 50 years you can be sure they'd take it in a heartbeat.

    10. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Last year a student asked me for help. He had about a thousand files that he needed to rename, using a simple pattern, on a Win7 machine.

      It took us 45 minutes of googling to find a piece of software that would do this, with great amounts of handwringing.

      I could have done it in one line using sed.

      Yawn, will check back in five more years to see if Windows is an appropriate OS for actually doing work.

    11. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Gauthic · · Score: 1

      OS/2, DR-DOS.

    12. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why didn't you just use sed?

    13. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      SmartPhones -
      Symbian 37.6%
      Android 22.7%
      RIM 16.0%
      iPhone 15.7%
      MS 4.2%

      So it's MS vs Apple vs OpenSource ... in all markets ? Try Other vs OpenSource with Apple and MS ans bit players ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    14. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      You can do it in one line using powershell.

    15. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Both of those died of natural causes and were dying long before Microsoft became as overpowering as it did. You forget that IBM was equally evil and controlling back then. This was a battle of two giants - not David and Goliath.

    16. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Hmm, looks like the down mod never stuck.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    17. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Netscape got screwed. If it weren't for open-source they'd be feeding wolves. OS/2 got OWNED, DR-DOS got OWNED.

      That bitchy company named Microsoft keeps screwing every fucking STANDARD out there and about 80% of the damn WORLD helps them doing it! Then they complain that somethings don't work and aren't standard.
      br/>Die, microsoft, die.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    18. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Jonner · · Score: 1

      With the way the Apple juggernaut has been steamrolling it would make sense to me for Microsoft and Open Source in general to find a way of co-existing. Say what you want about Microsoft, but Apple's heavy-handed, strict controls and policies makes Microsoft look like a pussy cat in comparison.

      Apple is even more of a contradiction than Microsoft. They have and continue to make useful contributions to a variety of important Free Software projects (probably much more than MS has done), such as GCC, CUPS and Webkit. They use those projects as well as lots of proprietary code to restrict users horribly. In fact, there are many corporations, including Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and Google which use and contribute to Linux and many other Free Software projects while maintaining an ambivalence toward the principles behind Free Software. So, there is already coexistence, but it's not always a good thing.

    19. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2

      Netscape was awful. Even the worst version of IE was better than Netscape. Even without integrating IE in the OS it would have died.

    20. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but let me complain! "Must make MS look bad".

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    21. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by speed_rrracer · · Score: 1

      45 mins and handwringing? U need to improve your Google skillz: c-y-g-w-i-n

    22. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      So they are good because they had to release the code because they were bound by a license?

      Make no mistake if they didn't have to - they wouldn't have.

      http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/09/apple-releases-ios-4-3-3-webkit-source-but-stretches-the-spirit/

    23. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      BeOS

    24. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by d.the.duck · · Score: 1

      It's like taking money from the Mafia to give to an orphanage. Sure good intention, but in the end it ends with broken kneecaps

      --
      Where does the signature go?
    25. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was win7 either use excel or the oo.org equivalent to create a rename script, or download cygwin, or perl, or python, or powershell. Explorer is not a file rename utility. it is a file browser.

    26. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by smudj · · Score: 1

      Apple crushed the GEM OS a long time ago by threatening to sue Digital Research. Hmm, what's Apple doing to HTC now? What about Samsung? How about Motorola?

    27. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go change your iPad you fucking macfag.

    28. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Servaas · · Score: 1

      It should have... what ThorGod said was wrong.

    29. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Cito · · Score: 1
      Plan 9!!!

      lol it was supposed to be the end all be all OS that just fizzled

    30. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      True, but that one line will be approximately 10,000 characters long.

      (I kid! I kid!)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    31. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or gnuwin32.sf.net

    32. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Indeed...but the thing is...that's not saying a lot all the same. If they'd quit intimating infringements to mug companies over instead of talking with the people that could honestly deal with them on the subject, I'd buy the thinking a bit better. As it stands...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    33. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gci | % { mov $_ "$_.bak" }

      10,000 characters?

    34. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Netscape failed because they produced shitty software, Mozilla is doing the exact same retarded shit as Netscape did right before its failure.

      As for OS/2 and DR-DOS, well, you are entirely correct. Microsoft played dirty to fuck them over. OS/2 at least. While its not really nice to intentionally introduce compatibilities issues with your competition, you'd be a complete and total idiot to think MS was unique in this respect.

      That bitchy company named Microsoft keeps screwing every fucking STANDARD out there and about 80% of the damn WORLD helps them doing it!

      Name a standard they fucked with that isn't properly supported by everyone else ... the CLOSEST you'll get is their Java implementation, and I'd give you that one, because they clearly did it intentionally where as apparently all the other Java VMs get a pass simply because they are shitty programmers rather than intentionally writing it differently, the end result is the same. Don't even think about bringing up Kerberos and LDAP, since they followed the spec to the letter and the only incompatibility was due to everyone using the same broken implementation which did not actually support the specification it was written for. So what do you got?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    35. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Right, and you're entirely different because you'd totally pay your taxes every year even if there was no repercussions for not doing so.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    36. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I could have done it in one line using sed.

      Cygwin.

      Which would have let you skip directly to step 2 - "use sed".

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    37. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      What have I got? (fixed that for you, by the way)

      Look around you, you tell me. Many other companies do the same crap that MS does, but that doesn't mean MS doesn't do crap. I'd go on with text editors, printing protocols, internet explorer (and its manipulated standards being enforced), .NET, DirectX, Java.

      The one thing that MS is good at (excluding eliminating others and making use-to-use-hard-to-dominate OSes) is maintaining their OS. They keep it cool in terms of backwards compatibility -- they do suck all your money for that (and some more) -- and they buy out everyone else to manufacture drivers for them (a mixture of the popularity they reached by ruining OS/2 and DR-DOS). The damn fact that they screwed OS/2 made them this popular, which, in turn, allows them to own the rest of the world -- well, not me, I just poop on their faces.

      Sure, I can't give you damn arguments, but at least I use an ethically correct operating system that I own, that was never involved (huhoh) in direct code by the NSA and whatnot. My OS is free and I just hate that those fucking idiots down at MS try to ruin it ("cancer"?). Linux wasn't made to compete with Windows: Those bastards just thought it was too good. Crazy talk? Yeah, I am crazy, and I'm mad because every fucking day there's an issue with some machine over at this house and, go figure, it runs windows and I'm the one that has to fix what MS fucked (the last one being the turned OFF wireless adapter making the OS come to a crawl because it somehow tried to sniff my PCs wireless traffic.)

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    38. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 0

      why would anyone want to learn powershell? MSFT got it wrong, they should have done what Apple did with OSX and used some *nix variant as the shell. sh and its offshoots are a de-facto standard. The fact that they made powershell somewhat understand nix commands is an admission of this.

      --
      blah blah blah
    39. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      While it's true that those are means to solve the problem, except for PowerShell, none of those are available by default in Windows 7, and documentation for PowerShell or the Windows command line is not nearly as easy to find as documentation on Perl, etc.

      It's an illustration of the difference in OS philosophies: Windows allows you to tweak things; Linux assumes you will tweak things. (OS X can be tweaked, but you have to go around to the back and find the access panel behind the shrub, next to the air conditioner.)

    40. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Nkwe · · Score: 1

      why would anyone want to learn powershell? ...

      Powershell understands types and is object aware. That is kind of nice.

    41. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      yes, and it's almost useless as a skillset considering most servers are *nix. Unless you work in a .NET shop, but why would anyone want to do that?

      --
      blah blah blah
    42. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >70% of programmers already know PowerShell by virtue of working with .NET. For the most part there's nothing or very little to learn at all.

      It's basically a shell made for programmers, unlike most of the Unix shells which are aimed at system admins.

      And the "*nix" aliases are purely for CLI usage; nobody actually writes scripts containing them, or people would beat them senseless.

    43. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Hatta · · Score: 1

      No one's claiming that paying taxes is generous. Similarly, no one should claim that Apple open sourcing WebKit is generous.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    44. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Actually, sed grep cat and other textutils apps are available compiled for win32

      http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    45. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by equex · · Score: 1

      php -a

      $ducks

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    46. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      What other OS makers were crushed by Microsoft exactly?

      None; but MS did intentionally destroy IBM's OS/2 (with some unintentional help from IBM).

      And is integrating IE much different than requiring iTunes for everything you do?

      well, yes. The only thing you are required to use iTunes for is purchasing stuff from the iTunes store if you don't have a mobile device (those can purchase stuff from the iTunes store without ever running iTunes). iTunes can be removed from a Mac with everything else working just fine (you lose a few features in a few programs, but that's it). There are alternative apps out there for syncing with iOS devices.

      How's IE doing nowadays anyway?

      Seems to be doing just fine; it no longer holds 98% of the browser market, but it isn't going anywhere, either.

      Apple doesn't commit the same crimes against freedom that Microsoft does but that doesn't make them innocent.

      very true. They don't commit crimes against their customers, but they make plenty of manufacturing and deployment decisions that I disagree with.

      To the guy who said - Don't trust Microsoft - don't trust ANY company. This isn't about trust - it's more about using each other. Look how much the formerly evil IBM did for Linux?

      Indeed... and without Microsoft, Apple would have foundered. in the late '90's. And Apple has been very good at being heavy handed about standardization recently, which has helped everyone.

      Let's see: I use Apple stuff because it "Just Works"

      I use Microsoft stuff because it "Generally works with what others are using"

      I use Linux stuff because it "almost always has a partially finished project that does exactly what I want to do"

      I use BSD stuff because it "lets me do what I want without breaking".

      Most other OSes I use are purely for nostalgia.

    47. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      Um. I like Microsoft bashing as much as the next guy, but we should at least be accurate. Powershell documentation is as far away as typing "help" into the powershell prompt.

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    48. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by GlassHeart · · Score: 1

      Make no mistake if they didn't have to - they wouldn't have.

      WebKit was created in 2002 with IIRC about 400,000 lines of KHTML code. While this is a good chunk of code, let's not kid ourselves that this represents something Apple couldn't have written from scratch to keep closed. Still, Apple presumably saved some development effort, and the resulting code is enjoyed by many - including Nokia and later Android. How biased do you have to be to turn a win-win-win story for open source software into a snide comment?

    49. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      Okay, there is a lot of documentation there.

      I probably should have written, "tutorials", as that's really what I've looked for -- at various times, I've gone looking for tutorials and free textbooks for several programming languages and so on, and generally been able to find several for whichever language or tool I wanted to learn about, but I hadn't found much of use for PowerShell. The documentation you point out reminds me of Linux man pages, which I use frequently, but I can scarcely imagine using man pages alone to learn how to write shell scripts. There's a very detailed man page for rsync, for example, but someone had to tell me that rsync was useful for backing up files, before I knew to look at it. Someone gave an example of a single line of code in PowerShell to batch rename files; I don't believe I could have come up with that in 45 minutes without some introduction to PowerShell.

      I just tried searching for PowerShell tutorials again, and found some book recommendations. I should probably just suck it up and pay $30 for something in print.

    50. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Queue the people that will claim that OS/2 was crushed by Microsoft.

      Many are running a derivative of OS/2 3.0 right now and don't even know it.

      During the IBM-Microsoft contract settlement, IBM chose to give up its share of the rights to OS/2 3.0 in favor of rights to independently make OS/2 2.0 compatible with Windows 3.0, a seemingly smart move because Windows 3.0 had already taken over the market.

      The next version of OS/2 wasn't crushed by Microsoft.. it was simply renamed Windows NT, and development continued.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    51. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      BeOS wasn't crushed by Microsoft. They werent even in OS competition for the same hardware platforms. BeOS was going up against Apple and NeXT, not IBM and Microsoft.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    52. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We love you Linux -- now where's my money!?!

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    53. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Much as Netscape was bad, I'm pretty certain that IE 1.0 wasn't anywhere even close. It was just that period when all browsers were bad (except Opera, but no-one knew about it back then just as no-one does now).

      As I recall, people started switching en masse around the time of IE4, which I believe was when "CSS layers" (divs with position) was implemented there, whereas NN4 introduced their very own <layer> tag. It's also when many sites propped "requires NN" and "requires IE" badges, or featured two different versions, because you simply couldn't serve both browsers with the same markup if you wanted to use new features. Then IE's implementation got standardized as part of CSS2 half a year after release (or maybe it implemented the draft versions of CSS2 spec, I don't recall which came first), and it got a major boost in standard conformance department - quite ironically, considering the later development.

      That, and IE back then was not the slow memory hog that NN has been. Once IE started also rendering pages better, due to better CSS support, NN was doomed.

    54. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      netscape got screwed because ie6 was miles better.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    55. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Let's see: I use Apple stuff because it "Just Works"

      just make sure you 'hold it correctly'.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    56. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Be Inc. appears to have disagreed (PDF).

    57. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Yes, for obviously they are like THE MAN! They wish to do nothing but OPPRESS and HARM us!

      Please. Realize how many different people and departments there are on a big company like MS. Hardly everyone is an untrustworthy dick. (Sure Ballmer may not always know what he's doing, but once again, that's an individual.)

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    58. Re:Microsoft and Open Source in General by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Be failed before Microsoft was even competition. Anti-trust matters that happened after that failure are irrelevant. They failed on their own.

      BeOS was already 11 years old and clearly failed by that point. Prior to that complaint, Be attempted to dump BeOS in 1996 but Apples generous offer of $100 million for a money-loser was rejected (Apple eventually paid 4 times that amount for NeXT.) It wasn't until 1998 that Be had an Intel version, still losing money hand over fist.

      Be lost money for 7 years prior to even having an Intel version. In other words, Be failed without Microsofts help.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  8. Yeah, right by javilon · · Score: 2

    Is this the same Microsoft that is suing companies for using Linux in their Android mobile phones?

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    1. Re:Yeah, right by zget · · Score: 2

      They're not suing for Linux, they're collecting for mobile phone relevant patents that have nothing to do with Linux.

    2. Re:Yeah, right by RazzleFrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if you only support companies without patent lawsuits pending then I think you'll find yourself pretty limited on choices.

    3. Re:Yeah, right by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They sued Tom Tom for merely using a Linux kernel that included FAT32 support. So basically, everything on the planet that ships with Linux could be sued for the same criteria. Someone needs to stand up to these lawsuits.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple is suing companies for using linux in their phones.

      Also, you are retarded.

    5. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we shouldn't criticize them then, huh?

      I'm not exactly clear how that logic works.

    6. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAT* filesystems are supported for interoperability.

      Is it just that any OS that can read removable media generated by Windows (and we cannot change this anymore due to driver signing) must pay patent fee to MS?

    7. Re:Yeah, right by Jeng · · Score: 1

      If I came to your home and just decided I wanted your car, would you not call the cops?

      Is that the best argument you could come up with?

      This would be more along the lines of.

      If I came to your home and took a picture of the painting you have on your wall would you give a shit?

      It's not theft, it's replication. Unauthorized replication is a crime, but it is not theft.

      The steal the car argument has been made plenty of times and it gets shot down each and every time because it is not accurate.

      The best argument wouldn't be an analogy, just state what is going on.

      Company A developed a technology, they developed it and patented it to give them an edge over Company B. If Company B uses that technology by law they have to compensate Company A or quit using the technology.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    8. Re:Yeah, right by npsimons · · Score: 1

      They sued Tom Tom for merely using a Linux kernel that included FAT32 support. So basically, everything on the planet that ships with Linux could be sued for the same criteria. Someone needs to stand up to these lawsuits.

      Or stop using FAT32. Considering its limitations, and that there are many better alternatives available with very permissive licenses, it's a valid option, especially in systems where the FS will never be read by anything else (trumping the whole compatibility issue before it gets started). Considering that flash is getting cheaper and bigger, pretty soon people are going to have to start moving to something with bigger volume support. And if you think that using newer FAT32 is an option, then you are ignoring the backwards compatibility problem; last I checked, WinXP wouldn't format a FAT partition over 32GB.

    9. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they want to stand up, they can pay for what they use like everyone else.

    10. Re:Yeah, right by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Have you read the patents asserted against Moto? 8 out of 9 are infringed by the kernel...

    11. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAT32 supports a filesystem size up to 2TB. You're correct the XP onwards won't format FAT32 over 32GB, but that is an artificial limitation to encourage the use of NTFS, it will still read/write to FAT32 filesystems over the 32GB limit.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Always say no to a cake by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    That might have a BSOD easter egg in it!

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  11. There is no Microsoft vs Linux by cobbaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only a small (though loud) minority of Linux users believes in a Microsoft vs Linux fight. Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel, not to be a competitor to MS. The GNU tools were created to have a free Unix. GNU + Linux is a fine example of open source in the Unix world, and is definitely not a reaction/fight/whatever towards Microsoft.

    --
    European Linux user, living in Antwerp
    1. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Sique · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quoting Linus Torvalds:

      Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 0

      Mod this truth up.

      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
    3. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by oGMo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only a small (though loud) minority of Linux users believes in a Microsoft vs Linux fight. Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel, not to be a competitor to MS.

      This isn't how it works, though. For those of us who actually remember MS in the 90s (and onto the 00s), it MS vs Linux simply because Linux had the potential to (and, obviously eventually has) become a huge competitor in the server and corporate market if never the desktop market. This is from Microsoft's perspective. Linux was not created as a competitor, but they eventually saw it that way, and have had any number of anti-Linux and anti-FOSS marketing campaigns over the past decade or so, in addition to incompatible changes to protocols, trying to not interoperate, hijack open standards, and simply give their stuff away to keep people from switching.

      It's nice that they want to whitewash history and pretend Linux was the snobby competitor that has eventually come to play nicely with them, but it's quite the opposite. If anything, this is the indication we've moved from "then they fight you" to "then you win".

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    4. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Correction: There WAS no Microsoft vs Linux fight. Then Microsoft starts stupid shit like "cancer", unspecified patents, and so on. These were not some jabs from a vocal minority within the Microsoft but from high profile, high ranking, individuals within Microsoft. If you're going to go on about the history you should at least include significant events.

      Ah... I see. It's the old Jedi mind trick works on every weak minded Slashdot fool: bundle a bit of truth to make a lie seem true.

      Linux had noble beginnings. TRUE.
      There is no Microsoft vs Linux. FALSE. If Microsoft's attacks weren't the initiation of "vs" then what the fuck were they?

    5. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by NotBorg · · Score: 2

      That's only half the story. Now pick some memorable quotes from Microsoft leaders and tell us it's all is rosy.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    6. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      What Linux was created as in 1991, and what it has become because of whom jumped on the bandwagon since then are two different things. Refugees from OS/2 and the Amiga community were early examples of bandwagon jumpers (they had nowhere else to jump) who brought with them an anti-MS attitude.

      There is a lot of Microsoft-hate out amongst Linux-users. It isn't pervasive, though.

    7. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Only a small (though loud) minority of Linux users believes in a Microsoft vs Linux fight. Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel, not to be a competitor to MS. The GNU tools were created to have a free Unix. GNU + Linux is a fine example of open source in the Unix world, and is definitely not a reaction/fight/whatever towards Microsoft.

      You've obviously been paying no attention whatsoever to servers and phones, where MS is very much in direct competition with various *nix, including various GNU/Linux and other Linux-based operating systems. Servers have been dominated by *nix for decades though MS is always trying to gain more market share. Phones will soon (if not already) be completely dominated by *nix, where Android is one of the most important software platforms. MS is also pushing phone development hard. Though there is much competition between Linux and Microsoft, I think the more important competition is between Free and non-Free operating systems.

    8. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that coming along?

    9. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel

      Windows NT was created "to be POSIX compliant". One can formally follow POSIX and still end up with unusable shit.

      not to be a competitor to MS.

      Microsoft marketing should really shut up about any of this. Currently there are three kinds of general-purpose operating systems -- minimal, Unix-like and total crap. Microsoft is firmly in "total crap" category. Unfortunately Microsoft is trying to destroy absolutely everything that even remotely resembles a piece of software, especially things that are superior to its products. This means, that for anyone to succeed, Microsoft must be destroyed. This was true in 80's, and it is still true now. Not unlike Inquisition, another organization that was shitting upon all forms of scientific and social progress until it lost its influence.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    10. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There is a lot of Microsoft-hate out amongst Linux-users. It isn't pervasive, though.

      Oh yes, it is.
      And it's a GOOD thing.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    11. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty well for every market except for desktop/laptop computers. HPC? Internet servers? Tablets and cell phones? Embedded systems? Windows isn't really dominating any of them.

    12. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Lando · · Score: 1

      Yeah it was kinda interesting to see Microsoft showing Tux throwing stones at windows and Tux trying to elevate himself to windows height. Definitely a windows centric view. Frankly, I don't care about taking down windows, I use use the proper tool to do the proper job. I tend not to use a hammer when a screwdriver is called for after all. I may bitch at times about the loose handle and the way the hammer keeps being chipped away every time it hits a nail, but that has nothing to do with the screwdriver. I mean, I use a lot of different programming languages as well, it's the fanboy base that extols the virtues of one language above all others.

      As far as trying to scare Linux, wasn't microsoft trying to destroy Linux by spreading FUD? Also, why did they leave out funding the SCO lawsuit against Linux/IBM?

      Heh, looks like the video was created by a windows fanboy saying the windows is better and linux is trying to play catchup. In my mind, for the things Linux is good at, windows is the one throwing stones. For stability, control, uptime, Linux is the one microsoft is chasing. Now, gaming on the other hand, completely different issue and I like my games as well.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    13. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your little quote is meaningless, as he says any effect on Microsoft would be unintentional. So you're backing up the point that Linux was never meant to be a competitor to Microsoft.

      It's that kind of shortsightedness from the luser community that keeps the fosstards in the igloos achieving nothing of real significance.

      And it's not just you, but also the lusers that modded you up.

    14. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by chrb · · Score: 1

      Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel, not to be a competitor to MS. The GNU tools were created to have a free Unix.

      It doesn't really matter what the original intentions of the creators were - the fact is that Linux not only became a huge competitor to Windows, but went on to beat Windows in every single market except the desktop. Embedded systems? Check. Cell Phones? Check. High performance clusters? Check. Servers? Check. Consumer electronics? Check. Those were all areas that Microsoft wanted to dominate in, but ultimately they came (at best) second.

      You may not believe in the fight, but Microsoft certainly did. I suspect they have now come to realise that the dominance of Linux in every area apart from the desktop is unstoppable, so they are trying to rewrite history to make it look like they never lost, because "there was no fight".

    15. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Linux was created in 1991 to be a POSIX compliant kernel

      The linux kernel was created because Linus as bored one christmas and wanted an alternative to Minix, and just happen to have a shiney new 386 to futz around with it on. Full stop. Everything else you make up after that is just made up.

      The GNU tools were created to have a free Unix.

      The GNU tool chain were created to have some open source alternatives to the existing common tools of the time. There were started before anyone had the idea of a 'free' unix, and well before the Linux kernel.

      Pretty much everything you said was factually incorrect and only happened several years later, but hey, you should totally be modded +5 insightful for fanboying it up.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    16. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Oh yes, it is.
      And it's a GOOD thing.

      Thats like saying racism is a good thing. Ignorance and intolerance are never good things, and it just makes you guys look like angsty sore losers to be honest.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    17. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Which is rather like a 100m dash runner saying "I'm not running against the competition, but against the clock." It doesn't make you any less of a competitor, it actually makes you more dangerous since you're not just a bleak copy and you won't respond to distractions or diversions. Many, many project leaders would have started to respond to Microsoft's FUD campaigns and be taunted away from working on the project. Microsoft has been trying to trip Linux up and while they might have succeeded in adoption, the project just keeps going because Linus ignores them. Which is probably the smartest thing he could possibly do.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems"
      he supposedly said this too. reminds me of the "assume incompetence before malice" type of rule

    19. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Thats like saying racism is a good thing. Ignorance and intolerance are never good things,

      If there was a race that was somehow compelled to write shitty software, I definitely would be racist. Fortunately this is not the case.

      As for intolerance, it's often a very, very good thing when applied to things that should not be tolerated.

      and it just makes you guys look like angsty sore losers to be honest.

      What you are saying is: "Don't fight your enemies! That makes you look like angsty sore losers!"

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    20. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by npsimons · · Score: 1

      There is no Microsoft vs Linux

      Poppycock. There may not be a Linux vs Microsoft fight but there is most definitely a Microsoft versus Linux fight. If that seems confusing, consider this: one cannot make enemies of others; only others may choose to be your enemy. Linux (and the large majority of its user/developer base) has never had the intention of being anyone's enemy. Microsoft, on the other hand, has most definitely made itself an enemy of progress, freedom and technological merit. They have shown, time and time again, that they would rather outmarket and use dirty tricks, both political and technical, to eliminate anyone who might take a part of "their" market. If you can't see this, you obviously don't know what you are talking about. This latest move is being scoffed at and viewed with apprehension by many precisely because of Microsoft's past behavior. Fool me twice . . .

      That being said, I still like this quote by Linus:

      Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
      unintentional side effect.

    21. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I'm not a MS fan by any stretch or the imagination, and I have been a *nix geek for over 10 years... However, with that being said, I can't stomach black-and-white "blanket" statements like "Microsoft is firmly in "total crap" category." Yes, MS is clearly in opposition to what FOSS stands for, and in a purely philosophical context MS is definitely "the bad guy" in this situation. However, having worked with MS products for several years in a variety of situations, I can say that MS products, mainly due to increased competition, are good and getting better. Unix-like? Of course not. MS products are merely another computing tool. I prefer flexibility, pragmatism and "openness", as opposed to dogma.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    22. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Quoting Linus Torvalds:

      Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.

      Well, to be brutally honest - from the FLOSS/Linux aspect, yes - Torvalds had no intent of competition with Microsoft. Most Linux distributions don't either.

      However, that hasn't stopped Microsoft from trying to pick a fight with the Linux/FLOSS community - or rather, numerous fights as others have kindly pointed out.

      The funny thing is, that they're picking a fight that they can't ultimately win. When it comes to competition, you have to have two (or more) entities involved that see each other as competitors to make the Competition thing work, and for one of them to eventually "win" the competition claim - e.g. Netscape vs. IE. However, only Microsoft sees itself in competition with Linux/FLOSS - the Linux/FLOSS community could (for 90% of those involved) care less. This makes competition hard as they have to constantly remind people about it, and pick a fight - a very one sided thing. The Linux/FLOSS community has responded defensively as appropriate but has still mostly ignored Microsoft as a competitor. Like with Google (which (at least historically) publically claims not to be in competition with Microsoft), it's a losing battle for Microsoft since the other side is not fighting back - Microsoft expends the resources, great resources, and gets very little benefit if any.

      Funny thing competition is, isn't it?

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    23. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      I always interpreted that as one part humor, and one part frustration with the kludgy, BSOD-prone "state of the art" as pushed by Microsoft in those days. It never really seemed like Linus wanted to specifically eradicate Microsoft. On the contrary: It seemed like he wanted to just do his own thing, and hopefully make it really useful and good. That aligns with the true hacker spirit, for sure.

    24. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      However, having worked with MS products for several years in a variety of situations, I can say that MS products, mainly due to increased competition, are good and getting better. Unix-like? Of course not. MS products are merely another computing tool. I prefer flexibility, pragmatism and "openness", as opposed to dogma.

      That's like saying that bank robber is yet another profession, and that bank robbers are getting less and less dangerous.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    25. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by BeforeCoffee · · Score: 1

      You want to know what is total crap? Productivity with the GUI on Linux if you avoid mousing. The out-of-the-box twisty tree control widget on Gnome is garbage. The standard keybindings and way it handles focus in and out -- now THAT is total crap!! Biggest complaint: left and right should expand and collapse where selected, GET IT?! Left-right gives me horizontal scrolling today on Gnome. Why? My keys on Gnome for expand/collapse: shift+left/right (and those bindings don't seem to work consistently across applications.) Why a modifier key?? Up and down work right in Gnome, that moves the selection up and down, which in turn can cause the control to scroll vertically, as needed. Why not be uniform in how to traverse? And I'm sure these infuriating defaults totally screw accessibility for people that have trouble with modifiers.

      Quite honestly, I don't even care to have keyboard control over horizontal scrolling in a tree control; that's how Windows works and I usually fare okay with it. But, if you want to be a total geek and be different, you could make shift+left/right the new horizontal scroll and make left/right the new expand/collapse/traverse child and smooth out the behaviors a bit.

      There's so many little UI nigglers I've run into like the darn tree control that just act badly or feel klunky on Linux that I hate to work on rich UI's there, it just doesn't flow. In that regard, for many of the small touches, I'd say windows is better and more productive; someone there cares (or cared long, long ago.)

      You want an operating environment that goes beyond the command line and is productive enough to court away windows users who care? Then you need to deep dive on every geek legacy GUI design decision across the board and fix every klunky feeling part of the default widget set.

      But no, I wager you don't really want new users on the GUI, do you? Just keep on thinking you're better and keep on boring everyone with that whole line, no need for humility, oh no.

      P.S. Oh, and bring back Multiple Document Interface as a promoted standard UI design for apps, that was the productivity bomb. Sad to see that one go by the wayside in Microsoft circles. Alt+Tab to go between processes, Ctrl+Tab to go between child windows. Genius.

    26. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by arbarbonif · · Score: 1

      Actually, bank robber is yet another profession and they are getting less dangerous. Irrelevant, but true

    27. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Personally I think a lot of it comes from those of us that have done a lot of work on the Microsoft platforms and jumped to linux. Remember that they were the company that couldn't even get "ping" right even with the source code of the BSD version to copy, and they were the company that has the audacity to put a copyright notice on the etc/hosts file that they took for free from BSD (among other more important things, just that one is hilariously obvious). On linux there just were so many "WTF does something that is this easy not work on MS Windows" moments.

    28. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Tab still seems to work to switch between tabs in all tabbed apps that I've seen, even if they aren't true MDI.

      As well, MDI still remains the easiest way to implement tab switching when writing your own native Win32 app - you just need to provide the tabs (and can reuse the stock "tab panel" control for that, with zero-size content area).

    29. Re:There is no Microsoft vs Linux by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.

      To his credit, he does all that he can to postpone that. ~

  12. Birthday cake? Microsoft? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Funny

    No story about Microsoft and cakes is complete without this video :-)

  13. The Cake is a Lie! by ELProphet · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the Microsoft Enrichment Center, featuring GLaDOS, now running Windows 7!

    1. Re:The Cake is a Lie! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Well, which is it? GLaDOS or Win7? Or are you running GLaDOS inside a VM in Win7 or something?

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  14. familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay! a trojan birthday cake!!! is the video ogg too??

    1. Re:familiar by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      strange, even video.linux.com embeds only the youtube clip...

    2. Re:familiar by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Since it's on YouTube, it's probably WebM (if you use the HTML5 player).

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  15. Voltaire had it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A clever saying proves nothing.

  16. Reading too much into things ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The bottom line is, these are all big BUSINESSES, with an unwavering goal of maximizing profits for their shareholders. When you see all of this "back and forth" between competitors, where one month they're bashing each other and the next, their CEOs are on TV together acting friendly? Remember that NONE of it really means much.

    I'm pretty sure that on a personal level, almost all of these tech company "higher ups" have mutual respect for each other. After all, people in similar income brackets tend to have a lot of common interests. (A Bill Gates type isn't likely to have a lot of fun going on the same discounted vacation cruises that your typical family signs up for in the summer, etc. Your idea of a "nice hotel" and his probably aren't the same, nor are your typical "good, yet affordable" restaurant choices, right?) And they share a common interest in furthering high-tech products or services for the masses in SOME manner, even if they differ on the details of exactly HOW they think the future should unfold with them.

    By the same token, most of the employees of these firms are just software developers, systems administrators and Q.A. testers trying to earn a paycheck in their field of interest. Guys I knew who coded apps for Microsoft often used Linux or a Mac at home, even if they really liked what Microsoft was doing. (Hey, if nothing else, it's refreshing to come home to something different than what you've got to use at work all day long!)

    I'm pretty sure a lot of this animosity we hear of between competitors is cooked up by P.R. and marketing/advertising types. If you've got a product you can get people to rally behind, it's very profitable to pretend you're at "war" with the competition -- even if the C.E.O. of the main competitor is one of your company's C.E.O.'s drinking buddies and they negotiate co-operative deals in the background on a regular basis.

    1. Re:Reading too much into things ..... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      While I think you're absolutely right about the relationship between business executives in the same industry and their apparent corporate animosity, you're neglecting the fact that Linux isn't and never has been a business.

      Tools and support to use Linux more effectively are a business - that's what RedHat and IBM have been selling for a long time. Applications that run on Linux can be a business - Oracle and IBM and MySQL and others have done that for a while now. But Linux itself is free as in beer as well as free as in freedom, and you can't build a business off of giving away your product for free.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Reading too much into things ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing CEOs are good at is selling their own self worth to the board of directors, and negotiating golden parachutes so they never have to work again once their incompetence is revealed. Or should I say the incompetence of their toadies is revealed.

    3. Re:Reading too much into things ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well written. People should calm down their emotions a little bit and be more rational like that.

    4. Re:Reading too much into things ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I was actually expecting someone to bring that up.... I never intended to imply that the Linux kernel authors enjoyed the same financial status as big corporate C.E.O.'s, or that Linux itself constituted a business. I'm talking about all the commercial businesses out there though, and that definitely includes Microsoft. And as I said, MS consists of a lot of developers who probably have nothing but respect and admiration for the developers of the Linux kernel and drivers. So my point is, regardless of where the Linux guys stand on the issue - it's not really THAT surprising (or indicative of hidden motives) to see some of the people at MS sending some congrats. their way.

  17. Beware of Geeks bearing gifts by johnnybogosity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Beware of Geeks bearing gifts...

  18. MS is priming us for their use of the linux kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a not so distant windows release. We will eventually have standard apis across hardware & platforms, and the oses will compete purely on features and performance while all running the programs. They'll no longer have differing APIs if they want to survive. MS sees this and has plans to ride it as far as they can, across their whole spectrum of products - windows phone, xbox, windows for pc - while Apple, Sony, Android restrict themselves to the developers in their respective markets who don't want to write one app for multiple platforms.

  19. So.... by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that they'll be making Direct X open source? :D

  20. is it really from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where the hell it says that Microsoft send it!!?? It just says "User-submitted video"

    1. Re:is it really from Microsoft? by rwade · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- was just looking for a comment from someone else on this. Indeed, I couldn't find any documentation on the linux.com's website on this video

      So how exactly do we know that Microsoft sent this, other than TFA saying:

      Among the well-wishers that have made submissions is one that would not necessarily be expected: Microsoft has posted an animated video congratulating the free operating system.

      How this "h-online" website found that Microsoft posted the video is unknown.

  21. "...from Microsoft"? by ischorr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure I understand. Based on the summary, this video was supposed to have been created by Microsoft? It was posted by The Linux Foundation and doesn't seem like a video that would be produced by Microsoft (not so much the style or content, but the perspective; it doesn't seem like it's Microsoft telling the story at all).

    Instead, it plays like some sort of lead-up to an announcement OSDL/TLF are planning to make...?

    1. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not see any reference to the author, why people is telling it is from Microsoft?

    2. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The video's page at the Linux Foundation, also linked to prominently in the YouTube description: http://video.linux.com/video/2127

      The author is "MicrosoftGermany". It's conceivable that it's a fake, but I doubt it.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it is not a fake...

    4. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Lando · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA you'll see that the Linux foundation made a call for video submissions for the 20th and Microsoft sent in that submission.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    5. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and TFA is from a trustable source?

    6. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Lando · · Score: 1

      Seems reputable, but that really wasn't the question. They question was, "Why are people saying that this video is from Microsoft?", to which the answer was, that the article said it was.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    7. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by qortra · · Score: 1

      Sibling beat me to it. For additional evidence: in the Youtube posting, there is a link to the Linux Foundation site with that video ( Happy Birthday ). On LF's site, the author is listed as Microsoft Germany.

    8. Re:"...from Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even directly from The Linux Foundation. It is a user submitted video. What it really is is another bad Slashdot summary :-D

  22. Screw Microsoft... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    You want to be conciliatory? Skip the flash animation wankery and give us real ExtN filesystem support instead of making us rely on flaky third-party implementations or having to drop what we're doing and reboot to access a damn USB drive...

    1. Re:Screw Microsoft... by mandelbr0t · · Score: 0

      And what's wrong with this ExtN FS reader? Do you expect Microsoft to write everything that runs on Windows?

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    2. Re:Screw Microsoft... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with this ExtN FS reader?

      Nothing's wrong with it (that I could tell with a cursory test), but since I was talking about filesystem drivers, it's also completely irrelevant. It serves fine (assuming it handles LVM. The last one I tried said it did, but never worked) to copy to/from, but that's it.

       

      Do you expect Microsoft to write everything that runs on Windows?

      No, and that's kind of a ridiculous thing to even ask. Since it's a closed source OS, I think it's entirely reasonable to expect them to write the low-level OS stuff like filesystem drivers, yeah. Especially since its infeasible to get a third-party driver signed.

  23. I don't know what to think... by aurashift · · Score: 1

    ...besides beware greeks bearing youtube videos.

  24. linux-based o.s. from microsoft? by intrico · · Score: 2

    This video looks to me like they are making a friendly hint of things to come. I know it would sound like blasphemy to many, but I could imagine they might want to make a such a monumental change to compete in mobile, where they are currently all but non-existent.

    1. Re:linux-based o.s. from microsoft? by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Why not? There's absolutely nothing saying they couldn't build their own distro on top of Linux or (most likely) BSD. In fact, I would advocate for that - less resources put into the backend work would allow more resources put into the user experience. It's the blueprint Apple used on OSX and it worked.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:linux-based o.s. from microsoft? by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      Kin, Symbian now Windows 7 ... hmm, you might be into something with this phone OS serial killer angle.

    3. Re:linux-based o.s. from microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non existant?

      The Nokia deal makes them the biggest actually.

    4. Re:linux-based o.s. from microsoft? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Which will never happen until Microsoft is forced to split out the OS division from the Office division from the hardware division, etc.

      It would free up the various teams to improve their products, work on other operating systems, without having to toe the line of being incompatible with other systems on purpose - just to reinforce the monopoly in other markets.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  25. Not Microsoft by starkat2k · · Score: 0

    The video says it's user-submitted. Even if it were created by Microsoft, they're not known to collaborate with anyone on anything. They make it a standard practice to buy out companies with good ideas, or like others have said, sue the pants off the competition that they can't buy out. Any possibility of a "Microsoft AND Linux" is just a fantasy.

    1. Re:Not Microsoft by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      Its from all the happy, overjoyed Nokia staff as a welcoming gift to their new incoming friends.

  26. Get rid of that dirty penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Penguins are dirty animals

  27. Back from 1999 Kim Special Agent by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Was at kimble.org At least he had a cool cartoons http://ara.informatik.tu-freiberg.de/Vorlesungen/stuff/kimble_themovie.swf

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  28. How about a simple idea how this came into being? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    a) Geek working at MS creates a cute birthday animation. For kicks, 'cause it's cool.
    b) PR dept. gets hold of it somehow
    c) Pr dept. thinks it would be a cute idea to show some reconciliation attempt.
    d) Geek gets a pat on the back and video is now "officially MS property".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Was i the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    expecting that cake to explode?

  30. Obligatory by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    The cake is a lie.

  31. just wait by GC · · Score: 1

    This is fine, until Linux put the Cake in it's sauce code, then Microsoft sued for patent infringement.

  32. Dripping with class envy, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn that Bill Gates and his fancy food! He's NOTHING like us!

  33. NOTW by simgod · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Tux was Australian.

  34. Why does anyone think this video is from Microsoft by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    Why does anyone think this video is from Microsoft?

    The video itself isn't credited, and it was posted to youtube by TheLinuxFoundation with the caption: "User-submitted video from The Linux Foundation Video Site".

  35. Re:MS is priming us for their use of the linux ker by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think they can use a Unix-like kernel. Wasn't that one of the conditions that they accepted when they sold off Xenix?

  36. Re:How about a simple idea how this came into bein by Cr0t · · Score: 0

    I do not work for Microsoft, but this sounds like my daily life.

  37. Mono by mj1856 · · Score: 1

    If MS really wants to cooperate with Linux, it should start by fully sponsoring the Mono project, just like Novell used to. Xamarin need this kind of support and it would be a huge plus for MS developers to start embracing Linux instead of rejecting it out of hand.

    1. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft and Novell always had many cooperation agreements. Why you think that MS will not cooperate with Xamarin?

  38. Re:Why does anyone think this video is from Micros by Mr+44 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I just noticed it was posted to the Linux Video site by MicrosoftGermany. Wonder how much the mothership knew about this one?

  39. I'll have a cake, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...only if it's the Microsoft funeral cake.

    Seriously? All friends now? Piss off.

  40. truce? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    What does it mean, 'truce' between MS and Linux kernel (or is it GNU + Linux distros)?

    SCO, anybody? Is the memory supposed to be this short? Was GNU/Linux out to destroy MS the way MS is out to destroy any business possibility for GNU/Linux?

    Once again: SCO.

    If you turn your back to them, the way that penguin did in that animation, there will be a large ice pick that very moment, right in the middle of your spine.

  41. Re:How about a simple idea how this came into bein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds about right..

  42. Comment to view ratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In terms of internet numbers, I find it striking this article already has 90 comments while the video itself only has 337 views. In the entire world. I wonder what the rtfa ratio is...

  43. Trojaned video by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    Anyone scan it yet?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  44. Yes there is by pavon · · Score: 5, Informative

    There may not be a Linux vs Microsoft fight, but there is definitely a Microsoft vs Linux fight. In their own words:

    * OSS poses a direct, short-term revenue and platform threat to Microsoft, particularly in server space. Additionally, the intrinsic parallelism and free idea exchange in OSS has benefits that are not replicable with our current licensing model and therefore present a long term developer mindshare threat.

    * OSS projects have been able to gain a foothold in many server applications because of the wide utility of highly commoditized, simple protocols. By extending these protocols and developing new protocols, we can deny OSS projects entry into the market.

    * They have paid for numerous "independent" studies to show that Linux and LAMP are inferior to Windows and IIS.
    * Leaked emails have shown them to have been funneling money to SCO via Baystar.
    * They continue to spread FUD about patent licensing, and have sued major Android manufacturers for patent royalties.

    They clearly see this as an Us vs Them situation. We don't have to respond likewise, but it would be foolish not to acknowledge their intentions.

    1. Re:Yes there is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you cite this?

    2. Re:Yes there is by thoromyr · · Score: 2

      for those who are too young to remember: there was something referred to as the halloween document.

      http://notagoth.com/microsucks/halloween.html

    3. Re:Yes there is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant find direct evidence so quickly.. look for yourself here: groklaw.net documents for "Comes vs Microsoft" Iowa consumer lawsuit.
      Maybe the text in GPs post is from the "Halloween documents", google that phrase to find them.
      About OSS as threat to Microsoft: that's easily seen in Comes vs Microsoft exhibit PX 9695 where the Microsofties debate when they paid ITC for a study to compare TCO in 2002, and it showed Linux too favourable.
      About FUD .. it becomes a lot more vague there. Well there's the "Evangelism is War" exhibit PX 3096 in the Comes vs Microsoft case for example. It's healthy for a company to want to win customers etc, but it's sociopathic IMHO if they want everybody else to lose instead.
      Also about the TomTom patent case: why did TomTom choose FAT-32 as filesystem instead of, say, ext2? I believe this is because they wanted to be compatible with as many possible other systems so consumers could use their TomTom in combination with their own computers more easily, even if these home desktop computers ran MS Windows (97% market share?). And because MS Windows only recognizes three read/write filesystems namely their own FAT-16, FAT-32 and NTFS, as opposed to Linux which supports what, 79 different ones? (I'm ignoring ISO-9660 here because it's more for read-only). Software patents are a brake on innovation and a brake on healthy competition. In the USA and Japan only, of course.

  45. Related to the num of commits by the MS employee by pietromenna · · Score: 1

    I believe that Microsoft is now interesent somehow in Linux success. Mainly because many virtualization options may run on Linux servers but having as Guests MS Servers. Also take a look at this article some days ago: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/07/16/2316251/Microsoft-Developer-Made-the-Most-Changes-To-Linux-30-Code

  46. Re:MS is priming us for their use of the linux ker by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    Entirely reasonable, they could sell an MS window manager as "MS Windows" and still sell office exchange, sql server, etc. At the same prices they have now. It would certainly be a loss in revenue compared to being one of many OS's but they would still be the 800 lb gorilla and people would still pay $100 to buy or demand their oem machines come with the MS window manager and applications set.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  47. Re:How about a simple idea how this came into bein by nschubach · · Score: 1

    You got an 8.5"x11" color laser printed certificate for your 10 year anniversary too?

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  48. Microsoft Cake? by d.the.duck · · Score: 1

    Microsoft doesn't offer you cake!....unless it's cake made from dog poo and knives. (will anyone get this joke?)

    --
    Where does the signature go?
  49. The opposite by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    can most definitely not be said, however.

  50. Linux MS new cash cow by andydread · · Score: 1

    With all the money Microsoft has been making from their Linux extortion campaign I'm not surprised that they are celebrating it.

  51. Re:MS is priming us for their use of the linux ker by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    I don't see this as a likely outcome, yet the very idea is interesting. Apple wouldn't be where it is currently without replacing the OS9 junk with BSD, replacing NT with Linux could make Windows actually usable for something more than rootkit-laden games.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  52. Is this just a big warning? by westyvw · · Score: 1

    The cake is the IP. Tux brings home MS's supposedly free cake. But the cake is filled with patents, and now they are inside Tux.
    Dont do it TUX! The cake is a LIE!

  53. "Antitrust" by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Oh oh I get it now! This movie is the M$ attempted reality-distortion-field of the movie "Antitrust" ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0218817/ ) and all the groklaw coverage of the M$-backed SCO trial ;D

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  54. oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cake is a lie

  55. Re:How about a simple idea how this came into bein by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    d) Geek gets a kick on the backside and video is now "officially MS property".

    FTFY.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  56. Re:Related to the num of commits by the MS employe by ledow · · Score: 1

    Most changes != best contribution.

    In fact, they were rounded on a bit because the changes were mostly crap and later reverted and all sorts.

  57. Dial the froth back to eleven by goldspider · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, can't you fanatics take one day off from your hand-wringing, the mouth-foaming, and the teeth-gnashing??

    Ferchrissakes even the Axis and Allies took a day off FROM A WORLD WAR to play a football game!!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Dial the froth back to eleven by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Technically that would be the Central Powers and the Allies. Wrong World War.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    2. Re:Dial the froth back to eleven by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Yeah I realized the error after the fact, figured someone would be kind enough to correct me. My point still stands :)

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:Dial the froth back to eleven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was world war one, and therefore the allies and the central power.

  58. Deleted Scene: by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    Tux eats a piece of cake, begins bleeding from the ears, nose and mouth then falls over dead.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  59. Re:Why does anyone think this video is from Micros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably nobody. I'd wager that this "MicrosoftGermany" account has no affiliation with Microsoft whatsoever. Unless creating an account with the word Microsoft in it somehow makes any further checks for authenticity unnecessary, and if that's the case, I'm off to register MicrosoftBillG right now.

  60. Just want to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate slashdot's login system. It always forgets my username/password combination!

    I wanted to post something else, but I'm getting too tired from logging in again and again.

    The most irritating part is that slashdot redirects to the home page after login, instead of staying on the page where you wanted to enter something.

  61. Step 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Embrace
    2. Extend
    3. Extinguish.

    "You made a fatal error, you trusted us." -- A Microsoft Executive to 3Com Founder Bob Metcalfe

  62. You can't ignore Linux servers. by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

    People keep arguing about the merits and failings of the Linux desktop. But in server space, Linux is very strong. Where I work, we deal with a mix of about 80% Linux servers, 20% Windows, so the two have to work together. Even the staffers who specialize in Windows Server administration tend to say that they wish the Windows systems were as flexible and easy to work with as the Linux systems.

  63. Re:MS is priming us for their use of the linux ker by BitZtream · · Score: 2

    We will eventually have standard apis across hardware & platforms, and the oses will compete purely on features and performance while all running the programs.

    How do you plan to have different features with no API differences?

    Of course ... if you had a clue ... you'd know what UNIX actually is ... as well as Posix ... see ... what you're talking about ... happened 20 years ago.

    Both UNIX and Posix certification specify a common API, but its so minimal that its useless.

    Windows has supported Posix for the last 10 years, it does require additional installation (but included with the installation media) for servers, but its there and meets full Posix conformance requirements. The NT subsystems support everything but posix sockets and threads on a default install, Unix services for Windows adds those to components to the mix.

    Pretty much every commercial OS you can think of supports Posix completely already.

    So whatever you think you see that MS has only found recently ... well, they knew about it probably before you heard of Linux.

    Its also note worthy to point out that Linux passes neither UNIX nor Posix certification, it comes close in some distros, but certainly not all, and some fair better than others. Its not unique to Linux, OSS in general fails at Posix support, some fail better than others. Which strikes me as funny, you'd think supporting a common API properly so portability was better on your OSS OS would be a high priority. Apparently reinventing the wheel is more important.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  64. The Video by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2

    After watching the video, I know I know almost as bad as reading the articles!, I had a few thoughts:

    - Well done video.
    - Kinda cute.
    - And clearly designed to show MS as the adult in any conversation as well as making not mention about how freaking evil they are.

    Every bit of that video was about as condescending as you can get. If they thought to win over anyone in the FOSS camp with that kinda crap they must really be drinking some very special KoolAid.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:The Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that there's no evidence that Microsoft produced this, and the video even uses a third person perspective. Everyone eating this up as authentic must not like to pay attention to details.

    2. Re:The Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really expect them to come out and say they did wrong? I was amazed at how far they did go; see the geeky guy scaring the penguin on "Halloween".

    3. Re:The Video by mandelbr0t · · Score: 0

      If they thought to win over anyone in the FOSS camp with that kinda crap they must really be drinking some very special KoolAid.

      And here I was thinking that the FOSS people were drinking the Kool-Aid. In 15 years, Linux has guaranteed its survival, nothing more. Continuing to rail against the company that did all those evil things and succeeded looks like FOSS people are immature and impulsive. Microsoft slights you or your precious OS, and you spout crap about Jonestown. When did Microsoft tell its people to commit suicide? From what I've heard, the Redmond campus is filled with people.

      It's this constant overreaction by FOSS people that's intolerable. Listening to Stallman tell me what I can and can't do with a FOSS system is the best part. This video codec is evil, that one isn't. Playing games, even ones you own, is anti-FOSS. And, of course, Linux is only a temporary fix until those academics finally finish Hurd. Face it, Stallman has his crew drinking Kool-Aid a lot more than the Microsoft people do.

      I jumped from Linux to Microsoft for one simple reason: I'm sick of dicking around with my computer. I don't feel all warm and fuzzy just because someone didn't get paid to write my e-mail client. I certainly don't feel all warm and fuzzy when my network driver gets upgraded and suddenly stops working. And, I really don't feel warm and fuzzy when I have to resort to the command line. Licensing issues aside, Windows costs less of my life then Linux ever did, and no one complains when I don't give them technical support. And, until I'm employed, I'm still "learning" Windows (for DMCA reasons, of course).

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    4. Re:The Video by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Wow, speaking of drinking can you pass me some of what you have?

      And here I was thinking that the FOSS people were drinking the Kool-Aid. In 15 years, Linux has guaranteed its survival, nothing more. Continuing to rail against the company that did all those evil things and succeeded looks like FOSS people are immature and impulsive.

      Yeah, shame on all of us who want to continue to point out all of the freaking evil things that MS has done and continues to do.

      What really happens is when this type of thing comes up it shows who is ignorant about what MS does and why there are where they are today.

      I could go on but once I have a feeling that you are a Fox News watching drone who feels might makes right.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    5. Re:The Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see it as clearly a form of projection. Microsoft atm (least according to slashdot) is making a killing on the Android.

    6. Re:The Video by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      If they thought to win over anyone in the FOSS camp with that kinda crap

      I doubt very much that they were trying to do anything other than produce a mildly amusing video.

    7. Re:The Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft only did "evil" in the eyes of FOSS zealots like you. Most people don't feel the same way and that is why they continue to use Windows. For the most part, it just works. True, it has some problems still, but it's a damn sight better than any Linux distro for staying the hell out of my way and letting me do what I want to do.

    8. Re:The Video by mandelbr0t · · Score: 0

      Ooooh one of your other accounts wasted all your mod points calling me a Troll. You might want to see how much karma I have to burn before proving just how immature and impulsive you really are. They don't have Fox News on Netflix, BTW. You, like all Linux users, need to grow up and realize that this stupid fight was over last decade. There are more important, platform-agnostic things to worry about, like the police state America finds itself in, and the wars that never seem to end. But, hey, keep overreacting to everything Microsoft does instead. I'm sure that will make the world a better place.

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. JScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There, took me less than 5 minutes. Just supply the guts of the rename() function.

    function rename(filename) {
            return filename;
    }

    var FileSysObj = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");

    var folder = FileSysObj.GetFolder("."), files = new Enumerator(folder.files);
    for (var filename, ext; !files.atEnd(); files.moveNext()) {
            filename = files.item();
            ext = String(filename).split(".").pop();

            var newfilename = rename(filename);
            if (filename != newfilename) FileSysObj.MoveFile(filename, newfilename);
    }

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. Of course, we all know... by sarloth · · Score: 1

    The cake is a lie!

  71. ooooh, cake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, seems like a decent gesture I suppose. Although I don't know how Linux and Microsoft can coexist any more than they already do. It's not like they can share code, after all. About the only thing I can think would be if they were to not intentionally break stuff for each other, but it's the leader that usually breaks stuff (like samba) by futhering development, and linux has to play catch up. Nothing bad there.

  72. Silverlight by fireflake · · Score: 0

    I bet the animation was done using Silverlight.... :)

  73. *blurk* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think i'm gonna be sick.....

  74. Linux to the Rescue by smccullough · · Score: 1

    a different vision of Linux vs. Microsoft... an animation I did last year...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V32M10npL8

  75. Herman - loosen up the 2 bolts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On your neck for today @ least, man... they're just TOO tight for the occasion!

    APK

    P.S.=> It's that, or have Grandpa Munster mix you up some "magic mellow out potion", ok?

    ... apk

  76. I know the answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft and Linux = Ubuntu ?

  77. Re:How about a simple idea how this came into bein by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    No. Of course not.

    We only have black and white laser printers.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  78. Any proof this actually came from Microsoft? by mmj638 · · Score: 2

    A lot of sites are reporting that this came from Microsoft but don't actually link to anything verifying this to be true.

    Can anyone link to something that would back up this claim?

    1. Re:Any proof this actually came from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heading "Microsoft just want to say Happy Birthday!" on the linux.com page with the video posted by MicrosoftGermany is about as close as I could find.

    2. Re:Any proof this actually came from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't seem to support Microsoft as a member of The Linux Foundation: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/members.

  79. Windows 9, death of the NT kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what is Microsoft hinting at? I can't imagine it would happen, but imagine what Microsoft could do with phones, tablets and personal computers if they adopted some open source elements as Apple did.

  80. Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After watching this video my firefox and ultimately my entire Linux machine crashed, twice.

    An attack from Microsoft disguised as a friendly gesture perhaps?

  81. You would be amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... how many tech guys here at MS have _heavy_ Linux and Java experience in the past. A lot!

  82. Re:MS is priming us for their use of the linux ker by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

    In other words, Microsoft Windows supports a standard that has fallen out of common use and in your own words is "so minimal that its [sic] useless". Why so you feel supporting such an out-of-use standard would be helpful to any Linux distros? The world is moving toward Linux and away from UNIX and Windows.

    BTW who pissed in your Cheerios today?

  83. Mango and Meego ? by jcdr · · Score: 1

    I can't shutdown this idea in my head after having read "Microsift and Linux ?" and by remembering the increasingly similitude between the Mango (Windows) and Meego (Linux) mobiles devices to be released by Nokia.

    Maybe Microsoft have realized that the consequence of having imposed there OS to most of peoples for so long have the side effect, now that there is a choice, that there are going away from it, simply to have the impression to have made a real choice. Microsoft can't fight against this problem, so there only option is to take revenue from Linux, probably by using fear of patents legal actions. This is overall a bad sign, even if this explain there new apparently friendship with Linux.

  84. Trojan Cake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I like the idea :)