And why didn't you provide a link to any page which links OSDN to "Murberry?" You claim that you found these links using lexis-nexis because you know that most people don't have a (very expensive) subscription to that database. Nice try. Anyone with an educational/legal subscription to lexis-nexis: Please do a quick search and refute this guy's claim completely.
For what it's worth, a Lexis-Nexis search for Murberry in the last two years returns No documents were found for your search.
> WANTED: Schrodinger's Cat. Dead or Alive.
Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but
shouldn't that be
Dead *and* Alive?
--
Not all problems have solutions
Does it come with a reasonably safe
*in situ* upgrade from 6.2. Or should
my first RH7 install be as a VMware
guest?
And actually, now that I think about
that, do I have any compelling reason
to expect VMware (2.0.1-570) wouldn't
throw up on an RH7 guest?
Not that the world would end if it did
of course...
Second, even assuming that DeCSS runs under Linux, it concededly runs
under Windows---a far more widely used operating system---as well. It therefore
cannot reasonably be said that DeCSS was developed "for the sole purpose''
of achieving interoperability between Linux and DVDs.
Judge Lewis Kaplan,Memorandum
Opinion granting the MPAA's motion to enjoin the publication of the
DeCSS source code on the Internet. [There was a time when judges were appointed
on the basis of fairness and intellect. I guess those times have passed.]
Slashdot Mirror
Not all solutions have problems.
Lithium is no longer available on credit.
> WANTED: Schrodinger's Cat. Dead or Alive. Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but shouldn't that be Dead *and* Alive? -- Not all problems have solutions
Does it come with a reasonably safe *in situ* upgrade from 6.2. Or should my first RH7 install be as a VMware guest? And actually, now that I think about that, do I have any compelling reason to expect VMware (2.0.1-570) wouldn't throw up on an RH7 guest? Not that the world would end if it did of course...
...they're all from Stanford
Judge Lewis Kaplan, Memorandum Opinion granting the MPAA's motion to enjoin the publication of the DeCSS source code on the Internet. [There was a time when judges were appointed on the basis of fairness and intellect. I guess those times have passed.]
Rob Pike has been badmouthing unix since at least, um, 12:56:54 GMT November 3, 1992. Go to this archive page and search page for "pike".
So what's the deal with this '?' thing generated by Microsoft software on platforms other than their own? What's going on with that? Anyway?