(1) Shatter: I'm sure they did shatter. But into vapor? Whatever. And where did you pull this Mach 1+ stuff from? Every commercial airline pilot I've heard talk about manuvering a 757 into and out of a spiral dive at 500 MPH said the plane would not have withstood the forces. It could not make the manuver. Now you come up with, out of your ass, a Mach 1 figure. Use common sense man. Really.
(2) Dispersal: The wings shear near the fuselage, the engines are further out on the wings. Make yourself any model to reflect this setup, and manuver it through a hole the size of the fuselage. You will notice that the walls will not exurt a torquing force to the wings. The massive weight of the engines would also resist a torquing force if there was one. The wings would have been plucked off, or entered the building. But folding along the fuselage is as nutty as anything else. Use common sense and physics.
(3) Destroyed due to fire: Kerosene burns at low temp. You could burn titanium parts for years in kerosene and still tell what the original parts were.
I don't really care if arabs or bushies did 9/11. The only things giving me headaches these days are totally weak stories people are telling themselves and others in order for them to preserve whatever illusions they want to keep about this country. The only thing that is certain about 9/11 is that many people can't make the connection between the what they saw and what they were told. The others will tell themselves anything that is remotely plausible in order to not be burdened with knowing they are being lied to.
The worlds biggest embassy being built by the US on the banks of the Tigris, and the many military superbases being built around Iraq are testiment to everything you said.
I think too that the PNAC crew that are currently implementing their Plan for a New American Century, believe they are partiots. Patriots to the utmost.
Perhaps they are patriots, whatever that means. But what they are not, are human. They are animals, fighting over a bone. To them the world is lesser, and america is the only. Everyone, including americans, suffers as a result.
The wings on most aircraft today are made to shear off (eg; snap off of the fuselage) upon impact, in order to reduce the risk of ruptured fuel tanks discharging their burning payload directly into the cabin.
Good point.
Um, so where did the sheared off wings go? Oh, and the two 10ton rolls-royce engines attached to them?
Are you saying it is easy for you to believe that the wings (and engines!) sheared off, folded neatly along the body, and vaporized along with everything else on the plane? No leaving impact marks, nor pieces of themselves anywhere outside the building?
There is no rational thought on either side of this subject. The tinhats who thought up the 'hologram' theory are nuts. But the people who buy the official line on this stuff are very delusional as well. Anything to avoid confronting that the US is not the shining diamond on a spire that they were sold growing up.
How about this: Bush is a patsy, a frontman. There is a cabal (PNAC guys - cheney, wolfy, rummy, etc..) that pulled together 9/11. Bush had the basic idea, but was purposely not told so he could have plausible deniability. I base this on the fact that the first 8 months of W's presidency was a whole lot of nothing. No direction, no accomplishments. Just clearing brush. He was probably told he didnt need to worry about doing much of anything, since his real presidency would start after 'a pearl harbour' of sorts (to quote PNAC).
The 7 minutes he sat stunned, his brain was repeating to himself "Holy shit shit shit shit! They did it. They are actually doing it. Holy shit!". And he knew who was behind it, so he didn't feel compelled to jump up and find out what was going on.
That video has been out for years. All the conspiracy sites show it. This is creapier than ever - the pentagon is rebranding an old video as 'cooperatively releasing sensative information that proves once and for all that a plane hit the pentagon'? Seriously?
And no, I can not spot a 757 in that video. If I was a man in the desert for 50 years, and never heard of 9/11, then saw that video for the first time and was asked to describe what I saw, it would be: "a stream of smoke, a flash, a ball of flame".
Whatever. This news is an insult. A joke is being played here. Again.
You gotta know that RIM is piasssed. After having to choke down NTP's garbage, they are out for blood. They are going to get MEDIEVAL on Visto! I pitty them fools.
Computer's are indispensable, I think everyone can agree. Who cares what container it comes in? Space, heat, power are all things that will be a thing of the past soon enough.
Laptop, tablet, PDA, shoe phone, put a dress on a desktop and call it 'Daisy'. Whatever. The real point is that PCs are destined to be portable, because it's REALLY EASY to make a portable computer a desktop - just don't pick it up.
eBay knows exactly how to turn something brilliant into a cesspool of garbage and agrivating charges. Please Google, come out with 'Gauction', 'Gmoney' and 'Gtalk' and spank eBay, Paypal, and eSkype off the planet!
(PS: If I can only have one, please spank Paypal. Thank you).
Why couldn't IIS be faster than Apache? Is Apache/Linux the "end-all-be-all, there is nothing that can be better so let's stop trying" type of quality? Are the guys who work at Microsoft a bunch of idiots that anyone can out-program?
I'm sure IIS is better at some things, maybe more things, maybe less.
Who cares! I don't think stats like these are why anyone chooses Apache/Linux over IIS/Windows.
Monsanto (and any 14+ IQ surface dwelling organism) would know that wind blows seed. Thus seeds move in wind, thus wind moves seed. Seed+Wind == Wind+Seed == Seed laden wind == Repositioned seed.
Knowing this ahead of time, probably even before they invented their Roundup surviving freak-seed, Monsanto should have known that in order to protect their IP, they would have to stop the afformention equation. To do so would mean any Monsanto seed buying farmer must build a biodome around their entire field. This way, no cross-pollination could occur.
And since these biodomes were never installed, nay, never even suggested! Monsanto is proven entirely neglegent in protecting their IP, thus the patent is invalid.
If the farmer didn't buy Monsanto seed, why should he suffer from the natural consequences of wind, pollen, and chaos? In fact, why couldn't the farmer sue Monsanto for damages brought about by Monsanto (including this current lawsuit)?
And if this a case about accidental/natural seed contamination, why isn't every farmer on the planet trying to bring down Monsanto?
Thank god the EU has some humanity and dignity left. I praise their stance on GM foods which is basically denying them completely, even wilfully paying fines brought by the WTO to not allow GM food trade.
Why would any nation allow, let alone a single farmer choose to use patented seeds under these restrictions? I'll answer my own question - GREED.
I hope Monsanto looses this one in a big, utterly devastating, way.
Better yet, patent the ON switch separate from the OFF switch. License the ON switch patent to everyone for free, then really screw the licensing fees to them for the OFF switch.
So tell me. If even gold selling artists take home so little coin, how come there are so many rappers and other artists on MTV Cribs that I ain't ever heard of that are showing off some serious bling-bling from green they made selling CDs?
Not stopping at a stop sign is a FAR WORSE crime than downloading/sharing/copying MP3s. People have died running stop signs. No one has even stubbed a toe 'doing mp3'.
If someone else is free to do things about which you have no knowledge, the government has no control etc
Think about what you just said.
You are actually in a place inside yourself where you feel that the goverment should have knowledge and control over everything that is done by everyone!
Slashdot Mirror
(1) Shatter: I'm sure they did shatter. But into vapor? Whatever. And where did you pull this Mach 1+ stuff from? Every commercial airline pilot I've heard talk about manuvering a 757 into and out of a spiral dive at 500 MPH said the plane would not have withstood the forces. It could not make the manuver. Now you come up with, out of your ass, a Mach 1 figure. Use common sense man. Really.
(2) Dispersal: The wings shear near the fuselage, the engines are further out on the wings. Make yourself any model to reflect this setup, and manuver it through a hole the size of the fuselage. You will notice that the walls will not exurt a torquing force to the wings. The massive weight of the engines would also resist a torquing force if there was one. The wings would have been plucked off, or entered the building. But folding along the fuselage is as nutty as anything else. Use common sense and physics.
(3) Destroyed due to fire: Kerosene burns at low temp. You could burn titanium parts for years in kerosene and still tell what the original parts were.
I don't really care if arabs or bushies did 9/11. The only things giving me headaches these days are totally weak stories people are telling themselves and others in order for them to preserve whatever illusions they want to keep about this country. The only thing that is certain about 9/11 is that many people can't make the connection between the what they saw and what they were told. The others will tell themselves anything that is remotely plausible in order to not be burdened with knowing they are being lied to.
The worlds biggest embassy being built by the US on the banks of the Tigris, and the many military superbases being built around Iraq are testiment to everything you said.
I think too that the PNAC crew that are currently implementing their Plan for a New American Century, believe they are partiots. Patriots to the utmost.
Perhaps they are patriots, whatever that means. But what they are not, are human. They are animals, fighting over a bone. To them the world is lesser, and america is the only. Everyone, including americans, suffers as a result.
Good point.
Um, so where did the sheared off wings go? Oh, and the two 10ton rolls-royce engines attached to them?
Are you saying it is easy for you to believe that the wings (and engines!) sheared off, folded neatly along the body, and vaporized along with everything else on the plane? No leaving impact marks, nor pieces of themselves anywhere outside the building?
There is no rational thought on either side of this subject. The tinhats who thought up the 'hologram' theory are nuts. But the people who buy the official line on this stuff are very delusional as well. Anything to avoid confronting that the US is not the shining diamond on a spire that they were sold growing up.
How about this: Bush is a patsy, a frontman. There is a cabal (PNAC guys - cheney, wolfy, rummy, etc..) that pulled together 9/11. Bush had the basic idea, but was purposely not told so he could have plausible deniability. I base this on the fact that the first 8 months of W's presidency was a whole lot of nothing. No direction, no accomplishments. Just clearing brush. He was probably told he didnt need to worry about doing much of anything, since his real presidency would start after 'a pearl harbour' of sorts (to quote PNAC).
The 7 minutes he sat stunned, his brain was repeating to himself "Holy shit shit shit shit! They did it. They are actually doing it. Holy shit!".
And he knew who was behind it, so he didn't feel compelled to jump up and find out what was going on.
That video has been out for years. All the conspiracy sites show it. This is creapier than ever - the pentagon is rebranding an old video as 'cooperatively releasing sensative information that proves once and for all that a plane hit the pentagon'? Seriously?
And no, I can not spot a 757 in that video. If I was a man in the desert for 50 years, and never heard of 9/11, then saw that video for the first time and was asked to describe what I saw, it would be: "a stream of smoke, a flash, a ball of flame".
Whatever. This news is an insult. A joke is being played here. Again.
You gotta know that RIM is piasssed. After having to choke down NTP's garbage, they are out for blood. They are going to get MEDIEVAL on Visto! I pitty them fools.
Bush violates the law and constitution. OH SNAP! I'm a "Bush Basher".
Ignore the fact that Bush violates the law and constitution.
Kill the messenger, ignore the message. I'm sure those are tomorrows talking points.
All I could think watching this, with Colbert never wavering, never holding back, never hurrying his words, was this man has balls.
Big, brassy, get-put-on-a-no-fly-list, cajones.
And kudos for being kinda funny too.
Now her's is a cause I can get behind.
Computer's are indispensable, I think everyone can agree. Who cares what container it comes in? Space, heat, power are all things that will be a thing of the past soon enough.
Laptop, tablet, PDA, shoe phone, put a dress on a desktop and call it 'Daisy'. Whatever. The real point is that PCs are destined to be portable, because it's REALLY EASY to make a portable computer a desktop - just don't pick it up.
I liked Skype!
eBay knows exactly how to turn something brilliant into a cesspool of garbage and agrivating charges.
Please Google, come out with 'Gauction', 'Gmoney' and 'Gtalk' and spank eBay, Paypal, and eSkype off the planet!
(PS: If I can only have one, please spank Paypal. Thank you).
MS Visual Studio is Microsoft's ultimate killer app. It's just the single best tool for software development. I use it even when developing for Linux.
Until Linux gets an IDE at least 75% as good as MSDev, top-notch large scale applications for Linux will remain few and far between.
If history is a good guide, the future iPod will become a monitor.
Why couldn't IIS be faster than Apache?
Is Apache/Linux the "end-all-be-all, there is nothing that can be better so let's stop trying" type of quality?
Are the guys who work at Microsoft a bunch of idiots that anyone can out-program?
I'm sure IIS is better at some things, maybe more things, maybe less.
Who cares! I don't think stats like these are why anyone chooses Apache/Linux over IIS/Windows.
I use FF now, but I have a preminition:
IE will get fixed, people will accept it and the world will move on. FireFox will go down as a footnote in history as the browser that fixed IE.
Monsanto (and any 14+ IQ surface dwelling organism) would know that wind blows seed. Thus seeds move in wind, thus wind moves seed. Seed+Wind == Wind+Seed == Seed laden wind == Repositioned seed.
Knowing this ahead of time, probably even before they invented their Roundup surviving freak-seed, Monsanto should have known that in order to protect their IP, they would have to stop the afformention equation. To do so would mean any Monsanto seed buying farmer must build a biodome around their entire field. This way, no cross-pollination could occur.
And since these biodomes were never installed, nay, never even suggested! Monsanto is proven entirely neglegent in protecting their IP, thus the patent is invalid.
QED.
...for the farmer!?
If the farmer didn't buy Monsanto seed, why should he suffer from the natural consequences of wind, pollen, and chaos? In fact, why couldn't the farmer sue Monsanto for damages brought about by Monsanto (including this current lawsuit)?
And if this a case about accidental/natural seed contamination, why isn't every farmer on the planet trying to bring down Monsanto?
Honestly, I don't know what the correct decision here would be
OMG!!! You don't know what the correct decision is?????
Let's see, choose between:
Noone being allowed to grow a garden
VS
The profits of a company
Holy shit - you must be an American. Only a born and raised money bleeding capitalist would think that is a hard decision. Geez.
Thank god the EU has some humanity and dignity left. I praise their stance on GM foods which is basically denying them completely, even wilfully paying fines brought by the WTO to not allow GM food trade.
Why would any nation allow, let alone a single farmer choose to use patented seeds under these restrictions? I'll answer my own question - GREED.
I hope Monsanto looses this one in a big, utterly devastating, way.
Better yet, patent the ON switch separate from the OFF switch. License the ON switch patent to everyone for free, then really screw the licensing fees to them for the OFF switch.
So tell me. If even gold selling artists take home so little coin, how come there are so many rappers and other artists on MTV Cribs that I ain't ever heard of that are showing off some serious bling-bling from green they made selling CDs?
Not stopping at a stop sign is a FAR WORSE crime than downloading/sharing/copying MP3s. People have died running stop signs. No one has even stubbed a toe 'doing mp3'.
(in my above comment, I meant to add 'in order to feel safe' after 'everyone')
If someone else is free to do things about which you have no knowledge, the government has no control etc
Think about what you just said.
You are actually in a place inside yourself where you feel that the goverment should have knowledge and control over everything that is done by everyone!
Oh my god.