Yes there was a information theft of up to 400 iTunes accounts, that had been retrived by phishing. Not so much Apples fault there. But Apple did up their security meassures after that.
Ur right but Android has not overtaken iOS yet. But last quarter they did sell more, but that might be because everyone wanting an iPhone was waiting for the iPhone4 just as me. Android has to repeat lastquarter results a few times before they are larger than iOS.
How did u get Lexus and BMW in the same line as status?
Well neither gets any respect from me:p I go WAG all the way, preferably Audi, but Porche isn't bad either nor Buggatti or Lamborghini. All of them available in 4wd configurations.
Mercedes nah get down to the toyota/lexus/bmw league.
That said. Yes Symbian is still greatest but if not Nokia gets their thumb out of their @$$ then it will not last long. I myself will get a iPhone4 now, Been Nokia user up till now, get them from work no charge. But now i will pay up to get an iPhone instead.
That tells you how bad Symbian is. The only operating system i can compare Symbian with is MS-DOS. Yes it has some GUI so ok it's like Windows 3.0 based on MS-DOS.
And i'm fedd up with it been a Mac user since late 80's And I'm stunned that in 2010 Nokia has not got any further than this.
Face it none of them is the largest. Nokia is the largest which even Steve Jobs said in an interview. Nokia just aint American why Americans have little clue of what Nokia is. Nokia started up as a rubber bot maker, then car tires, mobiles phones, monitors and more. Now Nokia has sold of the other focusing on the Mobile Phones.
But yeah Nokia sux compared to iPhone. Also Android is still smaller than iOS, but did sell more last quarter compared to iphone. But that is like comparing Apple trees with Apples. Apples should be compared against Apples. So the iphone should be compared to the HTC's xor Samsung xor SonyEricsson Andrioid phones.
Just as Macs have a global share of 5% which is huge if you compare it correctly against an other computer manufacturer as Dell or HP. But MacOS has a low marketshare when compared correctly against Windows.
Nope Andrioid is still to beat the total marketshare of iOS. But iOS if far from the largest out there.
I guess Display Postscript that was used in NeXT would have been a better choice for Apple than going for the license free PDF. At least DisplayPostscript was developed at a time when Adobe used to make quality code. Now they're more bloated than Microsoft, and refuses to fix their old bad code.
Been an Adobe user from the times of Photoshop 2.5-4 and Illustrator 3-5 and now CS-CS3 + Illu 7-10. And the later versions just suxs, pure bad implementation where they break their own code, and fixes it 2 versions later. Flash has always been flawed since it's introduction, I never liked it and never will.
But then Apple does not show it's old quality stand anymore either. I missed the days with MacOS when it just worked as expected. System 7-7.1 was nice. True multithreading and tasking wasn't so nice but still the user experience was nicer than in NT 3.5-4.
Nah ATM i'm tryingt to move away from Adobe products totally. But Photoshop in CS5 is very intresting again with it's content aware features.
This exploit can be used withouth trix, enough for an add banner on a commonly used webpage to utilise this. The user would not even notice.
So Virus is not correct as it wont replicate itself, but a trojan it's not as a trojan will require user action for install. This only requires the user browsing a page with the exploit.
I'm not sure what the defenition of a worm is but maybe this falls into that category.
not connected, hey we're talking iphone here don't we?
I would understandu u if u said Nokia,SE,Samsung,Motorola or even RIM but hey this is not even Android it's iPhone which pretty much is connected when needed, which is basically constantly.
Should have added that this information i got from at television program about Chernobyl where families of and persons that had lived there was interviewed. Today you can visit the area and one person has been aproved to move back and live inte area according to the program.
But then you should believe everything u see on the TV, shouldn't you.
I really doubt that life in univerce can have many different builds due to it's complexity in how it's buildt.
Anyway pathetic to serarch for it when there is now way to know how to search for it. And the posibility of finding life similar to ours is as earlier explained allready pathetic.
Only real use for this science is to know where we ourselves can one day settle down. I'm not against the science in it self, just find the strong believe in extra terrestial life out there pathetic, as the chances for it are so incredible minimal due to what i explained earlier.
H.264/Mpeg4 all the way if possible for some years now... I guess all macusers have realised long ago that h.264 is tha shit if u wanna do well compatibilityvice.
If you consider the complexity of life to even form and then consider the complexity of the planet + solar system to even support life.
Then consider what is the correct circumstances in a galaxy to allow such solar systems to emerge. And you find out that the possibility of life to spontaneously have started on those FEW! planets in our whole universe, you realize that is pathetic to search for extra terrestrial life.
Viewed in this perspective our universe is not huge at all though it's huge to us humans, still to small to contain enough planets for life to emerge on. And if there is life on an other planet in our universe I've would strongly consider that it was created.
But then few even see it that way, not even so called scientists. Those scientist should interest themselves of other science groups to actually se the whole picture. Math, Physics, Astronomy, Biology, Geology.
Just a few examples
The solar system needs to be at a certain distance from the galaxy core, why?
1 ) Because if it's to close to the galaxy core radiation would kill any life that would have emerged the cosmic radiation would be to strong not even earth would be habitable in such condition. The distance would vary from galaxy to galaxy.
2 ) If it's to far from the galaxy core there will not be enough matter to even form life. Eg, Iron would not be available and Iron is needed to form life and to protect life. A planet without a Iron core will not protect it's inhabitants from cosmic radiation that is totally hazardous to life. Earth has an iron core that generates a magnetic field that shields life on earth from most of the cosmic radiation.
The planet it self need to have it's temperature within a certain range to be able to inhabit life. It would also need to have a certain tilt,as earth toward the sun, to be habitable. This tilt makes earth having a well temperated climate and allows life to exist around the whole globe. Without this steady tilt there would only be a small area where life could emerge on such a planet, and that area might move around and not be stable!
Then next Evolution should have actually started out which is full of "Which came first, egg or hen" paradoxes. Eg RNA,DNA and many others.
Nope, I do not believe in extra terrestrial life the possible amount of planets that have the right circumstances are way to few, and the possibility for evolution to happen on those few planets makes the chance for extra terrestrial life incredible small.
In my view this science is interesting as in how to find planets where we humans one day could exploiter on, but the searching for life on other planets is in my view totally pathetic and waste of time. I have once done the calculations based on some studies I have read and anyone can do them.
I'm not an scientist so don't take my word for it but, dig in to all those studies made on what makes life possible on earth and transform them into checkpoints of the environment that is needed on an extra terrestrial planet. And you'll see our huge universe is not huge at all it's small.
I don't say that such planets would not exist I believe they do but they are not enough in numbers to allow a second planet with life in our universe. Statistically out of the chart of possibility.
Slashdot Mirror
So what ur telling is the same as the one above, just different in explanation. Duh!
isn't that the idal status, imo any material have that property
Yes there was a information theft of up to 400 iTunes accounts, that had been retrived by phishing.
Not so much Apples fault there. But Apple did up their security meassures after that.
Maybe true in USA... but USA is small comapared to the "rest", just as the way Americans want to view non Americans.
Ur right but Android has not overtaken iOS yet. But last quarter they did sell more, but that might be because everyone wanting an iPhone was waiting for the iPhone4 just as me.
Android has to repeat lastquarter results a few times before they are larger than iOS.
not at all, windows laptops aint close to what a ipad is. Yeah yeah ms fanboys i know they are more than that but still not close.
How did u get Lexus and BMW in the same line as status?
Well neither gets any respect from me:p I go WAG all the way, preferably Audi, but Porche isn't bad either nor Buggatti or Lamborghini. All of them available in 4wd configurations.
Mercedes nah get down to the toyota/lexus/bmw league.
That said. Yes Symbian is still greatest but if not Nokia gets their thumb out of their @$$ then it will not last long. I myself will get a iPhone4 now, Been Nokia user up till now, get them from work no charge. But now i will pay up to get an iPhone instead.
That tells you how bad Symbian is. The only operating system i can compare Symbian with is MS-DOS. Yes it has some GUI so ok it's like Windows 3.0 based on MS-DOS.
And i'm fedd up with it been a Mac user since late 80's And I'm stunned that in 2010 Nokia has not got any further than this.
And adnriod is far behind Symbian...
Face it none of them is the largest. Nokia is the largest which even Steve Jobs said in an interview. Nokia just aint American why Americans have little clue of what Nokia is. Nokia started up as a rubber bot maker, then car tires, mobiles phones, monitors and more. Now Nokia has sold of the other focusing on the Mobile Phones.
But yeah Nokia sux compared to iPhone. Also Android is still smaller than iOS, but did sell more last quarter compared to iphone. But that is like comparing Apple trees with Apples. Apples should be compared against Apples. So the iphone should be compared to the HTC's xor Samsung xor SonyEricsson Andrioid phones.
Just as Macs have a global share of 5% which is huge if you compare it correctly against an other computer manufacturer as Dell or HP. But MacOS has a low marketshare when compared correctly against Windows.
Nope Andrioid is still to beat the total marketshare of iOS. But iOS if far from the largest out there.
As if Windows havn't had these bugs...
(-1 Troll) because an open system actually can be rootkited....
that would kill a lot of iOS...
I guess Display Postscript that was used in NeXT would have been a better choice for Apple than going for the license free PDF. At least DisplayPostscript was developed at a time when Adobe used to make quality code. Now they're more bloated than Microsoft, and refuses to fix their old bad code.
Been an Adobe user from the times of Photoshop 2.5-4 and Illustrator 3-5 and now CS-CS3 + Illu 7-10. And the later versions just suxs, pure bad implementation where they break their own code, and fixes it 2 versions later. Flash has always been flawed since it's introduction, I never liked it and never will.
But then Apple does not show it's old quality stand anymore either. I missed the days with MacOS when it just worked as expected. System 7-7.1 was nice. True multithreading and tasking wasn't so nice but still the user experience was nicer than in NT 3.5-4.
Nah ATM i'm tryingt to move away from Adobe products totally. But Photoshop in CS5 is very intresting again with it's content aware features.
This exploit can be used withouth trix, enough for an add banner on a commonly used webpage to utilise this. The user would not even notice.
So Virus is not correct as it wont replicate itself, but a trojan it's not as a trojan will require user action for install. This only requires the user browsing a page with the exploit.
I'm not sure what the defenition of a worm is but maybe this falls into that category.
ur wrong about open systems being secure
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Android-rootkit-demonstrated-1049183.html
intressting not on an other iphone flamebaite
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Google-uses-remote-delete-to-remove-Android-apps-from-smartphones-Update-1029188.html
lol anti apple fanboyism has always been grater than apple fanboyism
ur and perfect example of it, just as antennagate is.
not connected, hey we're talking iphone here don't we?
I would understandu u if u said Nokia,SE,Samsung,Motorola or even RIM but hey this is not even Android it's iPhone which pretty much is connected when needed, which is basically constantly.
The very first virus written on an Apple II also did the user a favor...
Should have added that this information i got from at television program about Chernobyl where families of and persons that had lived there was interviewed. Today you can visit the area and one person has been aproved to move back and live inte area according to the program.
But then you should believe everything u see on the TV, shouldn't you.
One russian persion has got approval to move back and lives there now!
don't like hard facts?
Got it working thx, did find a different mirror.
I really doubt that life in univerce can have many different builds due to it's complexity in how it's buildt.
Anyway pathetic to serarch for it when there is now way to know how to search for it. And the posibility of finding life similar to ours is as earlier explained allready pathetic.
Only real use for this science is to know where we ourselves can one day settle down. I'm not against the science in it self, just find the strong believe in extra terrestial life out there pathetic, as the chances for it are so incredible minimal due to what i explained earlier.
No known protain is immune to cosmic radiation.
Why I never used DivX ever as user...
H.264/Mpeg4 all the way if possible for some years now...
I guess all macusers have realised long ago that h.264 is tha shit if u wanna do well compatibilityvice.
thx but they link it to a site with a crippled download :(
And who modded this down.
Alcohol is used in medicin even so don't mod me down for simple facts!
If you consider the complexity of life to even form and then consider the complexity of the planet + solar system to even support life.
Then consider what is the correct circumstances in a galaxy to allow such solar systems to emerge. And you find out that the possibility of life to spontaneously have started on those FEW! planets in our whole universe, you realize that is pathetic to search for extra terrestrial life.
Viewed in this perspective our universe is not huge at all though it's huge to us humans, still to small to contain enough planets for life to emerge on. And if there is life on an other planet in our universe I've would strongly consider that it was created.
But then few even see it that way, not even so called scientists. Those scientist should interest themselves of other science groups to actually se the whole picture. Math, Physics, Astronomy, Biology, Geology.
Just a few examples
The solar system needs to be at a certain distance from the galaxy core, why?
1 ) Because if it's to close to the galaxy core radiation would kill any life that would have emerged the cosmic radiation would be to strong not even earth would be habitable in such condition. The distance would vary from galaxy to galaxy.
2 ) If it's to far from the galaxy core there will not be enough matter to even form life. Eg, Iron would not be available and Iron is needed to form life and to protect life. A planet without a Iron core will not protect it's inhabitants from cosmic radiation that is totally hazardous to life. Earth has an iron core that generates a magnetic field that shields life on earth from most of the cosmic radiation.
The planet it self need to have it's temperature within a certain range to be able to inhabit life. It would also need to have a certain tilt ,as earth toward the sun, to be habitable. This tilt makes earth having a well temperated climate and allows life to exist around the whole globe. Without this steady tilt there would only be a small area where life could emerge on such a planet, and that area might move around and not be stable!
Then next Evolution should have actually started out which is full of "Which came first, egg or hen" paradoxes. Eg RNA,DNA and many others.
Nope, I do not believe in extra terrestrial life the possible amount of planets that have the right circumstances are way to few, and the possibility for evolution to happen on those few planets makes the chance for extra terrestrial life incredible small.
In my view this science is interesting as in how to find planets where we humans one day could exploiter on, but the searching for life on other planets is in my view totally pathetic and waste of time. I have once done the calculations based on some studies I have read and anyone can do them.
I'm not an scientist so don't take my word for it but, dig in to all those studies made on what makes life possible on earth and transform them into checkpoints of the environment that is needed on an extra terrestrial planet. And you'll see our huge universe is not huge at all it's small.
I don't say that such planets would not exist I believe they do but they are not enough in numbers to allow a second planet with life in our universe. Statistically out of the chart of possibility.