Speaking of booting off of EPROM's, does anyone know if a flourescent style black-light puts out enough UV to erase an EPROM? I built a simple programmer, but I don't want to buy an eraser, but I do own a black-light. Any help would be appreciated.
I used to have a SoundBlaster16 PNP with a real IDE interface on it (not the crappy proprietary CD-ROM interface). It ran as a tertiary IDE controller under Windows 95, with a standard IDE driver (nothing Creative Labs specific AFAIK).
The thing is, I never did get it to work under Linux, but I also have to take into account the fact that I was a newbie to the OS at the time.
I don't know if the kernel supports more than two IDE/EIDE controllers. If you have that many devices, frankly:
GET YOURSELF A SCSI SETUP! STOP THE EIDE INSANITY!
I did it when I needed more devices than my onboard controllers could handle. In fact, my onboard IDE has been shutdown to free up the resources.
IDE I/O is very CPU intensive, you'll find it to be faster to go SCSI.
Diodes will RECTIFY the signal, only allowing part of the audio waveform through. Last I checked, at least. Transistors are much the same way, if used in "diode mode"
Login to a SCO OpenServer box sometime. You'll see that there's a line "(C) 1980-1994 Microsoft Corporation".
Funny, huh? They had it, and sold it. I can't entirely blame them. SCO ain't that great. Then again, MS might have something to do with how it works now. I don't see them buying the stuff they sold to SCO anytime soon.
That is *unless* you were being sarcastic.
Re:Hype! I bought Jar Jar boxer shorts already.
on
More Star Wars Hype
·
· Score: 1
Rishathra, I think is the correct spelling. Damn, I haven't heard that term in YEARS.
I have to say that I liked the older format better. ESR should be using anchored files instead of a file for every single entry, IMHO. 100K of a text file ain't that big.
Well, I don't know about this thing, but there used to be a company out there that produces a product, intended for those are disabled, that allowed input of text via code key/paddles/keyer.
It's been a while since I saw it, couldn't tell you where to find it.
Slashdot Mirror
Speaking of booting off of EPROM's, does anyone know if a flourescent style black-light puts out enough UV to erase an EPROM? I built a simple programmer, but I don't want to buy an eraser, but I do own a black-light. Any help would be appreciated.
Oh, this is priceless!
.signature file material for sure.
Bravo!
Yes...
I used to have a SoundBlaster16 PNP with a real IDE interface on it (not the crappy proprietary CD-ROM interface). It ran as a tertiary IDE controller under Windows 95, with a standard IDE driver (nothing Creative Labs specific AFAIK).
The thing is, I never did get it to work under Linux, but I also have to take into account the fact that I was a newbie to the OS at the time.
I don't know if the kernel supports more than two IDE/EIDE controllers. If you have that many devices, frankly:
GET YOURSELF A SCSI SETUP! STOP THE EIDE INSANITY!
I did it when I needed more devices than my onboard controllers could handle. In fact, my onboard IDE has been shutdown to free up the resources.
IDE I/O is very CPU intensive, you'll find it to be faster to go SCSI.
*SMACK*
Try, maybe, a DPDT SWITCH?
Diodes will RECTIFY the signal, only allowing part of the audio waveform through. Last I checked, at least. Transistors are much the same way, if used in "diode mode"
Oooh. Not the Federation/Borg/Dominion/Cardassians/Klingon/Romul an VS Rebel/Empire fleet thing again!
Though it is fun to debate.
Whups. Didn't know about that. Thanks.
Been there, done that...
Login to a SCO OpenServer box sometime.
You'll see that there's a line "(C) 1980-1994 Microsoft Corporation".
Funny, huh? They had it, and sold it. I can't entirely blame them. SCO ain't that great. Then again, MS might have something to do with how it works now. I don't see them buying the stuff they sold to SCO anytime soon.
That is *unless* you were being sarcastic.
Rishathra, I think is the correct spelling. Damn, I haven't heard that term in YEARS.
Try *ONE*. Different transciever styles for different media, and all your are *really* doing is propagating RF on the thing anyway.
Please don't feed the troll. Move along, move along.
Either that, or this dweeb has never administered both. (I have/do, and fscking hate it).
I just read it. Why am I not surprised that G**bor et al. somehow got involved? Fscking kooks. It's what drove me off of USENET in the first place.
Could you care to elaborate? I seem to have missed that one, having not been USENETting for quite some time.
I have to say that I liked the older format better. ESR should be using anchored files instead of a file for every single entry, IMHO. 100K of a text file ain't that big.
Well, I don't know about this thing, but there used to be a company out there that produces a product, intended for those are disabled, that allowed input of text via code key/paddles/keyer.
It's been a while since I saw it, couldn't tell you where to find it.
60-90 KHz? Suuure...
Try 48.0-49.8 MHz or so.
I'm not sure about the 900 SSM units, but I think that they are in the 902-928.