Slashdot Mirror


More Star Wars Hype

We break the week barrier, and tons of people email to gloat that they've seen screenings. The rest of us will have to settle for massive media hype including mantid's note from harper's that proclaims that Reagan's Star Wars project costed $4.166 billion, but Star Wars merchandise costed $4.5 billion. mattdm noted that Moviefone blew up under the ticket demand yesterday. ZD-Net has a report. DH1 sent us a really top notch interview at Salon with Empire Director Irvin Kershner- kinda nice to read something cool about the original movies after all this gas over the new one. Lastly Jethro73 sent us a George Lucas's take on piracy of Star Wars. Basically, he will be very angry and fight very hard (big surprise) against pirates. Update: 05/14 01:59 by CT : My ticket plans haven't happened, so if anyone has bright ideas on getting tickets for the Slashdot crew while we're at LinuxExpo, lemme know...

284 comments

  1. Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Lucas specify that there were to be no advnanced ticket sales? Then how come I was able to buy two tickets to the first show Weds morning(12:01) at my local movie theater. How serious are the theaters really taking him?

    1. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas changed his original announcement of no pre-sales to allow pre-sales a week early.

    2. Re:Tickets by Xamot · · Score: 1

      That's strange, because I have tickets to see it the 23rd at an AMC theater.

      --
      ?
    3. Re:Tickets by Man+In+Black · · Score: 1

      3:00? They started selling at 2:00 here in Winnipeg. I guess Lucas also dropped his restriction about it having to be in THX too, because only two of the three theatres showing it here will have THX (Of course, there's also the third option that this theatre is disobeying the agreements). Oh well, I have my Wed. 12:05am tickets, so I'm happy :)

      --
      -"One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man." -EH
    4. Re:Tickets by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Not all theaters. Only the ones that signed limit deals and such were allowed pre-release sales. In California I know Edwards Cinemas was allowed to and so was another one...but I forgot. Anyways I know AMC wasnt allowed to. I got my tickets at Edwards 22 in Ontario, the AMC across the parking lot was practically empty. But they got to presale for Titanic so it works out doesnt it?

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    5. Re:Tickets by Aramoro · · Score: 2

      He changed the policy a while ago. All theaters were allowed to sell on 5/12 at 3pm.

  2. Star Wars costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice that the cost for the Pentagon Star Wars program was for a _single year_ while the cost for Star Wars toys was for 20 years. For what the Pentagon is going to waste this year alone, they probably could give everyone in the world their own action figure.

    1. Re:Star Wars costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a real plan for progress and world peace. :)

    2. Re:Star Wars costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think an action figure will save your ass. On the other hand, those little Star Wars dudes rotting in my basement just might buy me a fallout shelter.

  3. Make up your own mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least watch the movie before declaring it a classic.

  4. What are the odds of unsuccessfully navigating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we're talking about a real asteroid field, like the one we have in our solar system, isn't it more realistic to say that the odds of unsuccessfully navigating an asteroid field are incredibly low? After all, you would almost have to be aiming for one to hit it. You probably wouldn't even be able to find one in an uncharted field without a few weeks of searching. Of course, I suppose it's possible that the asteroid field in "The Empire Strikes Back" was a fairly special phenomenon, like site of a recent collision involving a really massive asteroid, and everything was in the process of falling back together into one big clump. Or something like that. Yeah.
    Just a point of view from your friendly neighborhood anorak-wearing pedant.

  5. Not that impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... when compared with a sword swallower doing the exact same trick with the same length of rigid steel blade, even if the blade isn't really sharp. Anyway, I wonder what Howard Stern found lacking in the movie? No princesses in gold bikinis chained to giant slugs? Maybe he thought that Jar Jar Binks (that's his name, right?) being an alien, should logically have been a hermaphrodite and should have gotten it on with himself on screen. That sort of thing seems to be where Howard Stern's tastes lie, anyway. Is there a copy of his review available over the internet?

  6. Re:My can of Diet Pepsi had Queen Amidala (sp?) on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Lucas has spent almost nothing on marketing for TPM. Almost all marketing has come in the form of advertiser tie-ins and publicity magazine articles.

    Lucas has pulled a pretty brilliant stunt here. He mad this movie for something like $113 million (5 million under budget) spent almost nothing on advertising (typically advertising costs about $20 million for a blockbuster like this) and to top it all off, the movie has paid for itself before it's even been seen (TPM Merchandise has already recieved more profits than the cost of the movie).

    This movie is unique, but not because of it's content.

  7. Expectations for TPM are waaay to high. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just nuts. People are treating this movie like the second coming of Jesus with their expectations. I think that a lot people have fond memories of Star Wars and are over-hyping TPM to the point that they expect this movie to somehow bring back their childhood for crying out loud. Well, of course, it ain't gonna happen. Sure it'll probably be good, but don't expect miracles. It's still just a movie.

    1. Re:Expectations for TPM are waaay to high. by Lord+Kenja · · Score: 1

      The second coming of Jesus? No! That would greatly be ignored - I think. No this is the second coming of Star Wars.

      This is a chance to find out what happened before the movies we have already seen. A chance to expand the view into a universe we (or most of us) have come to find as the best alternative to reality. A superb mix of science-fiction and romance of classic fantacy (AD&D/Tolken) stories.

      Hopefully George have continued his vision in style. If not we'll still get the story of how Anakin became Darth Vader. And we'll still get some new starfighter designs LucasArts can use for spacefighter games :)

  8. Hype! I bought Jar Jar boxer shorts already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else here think that Jar Jar Binks is...um...kind of sexy?

    1. Re:Hype! I bought Jar Jar boxer shorts already. by teleny · · Score: 1

      Yes! Those shoulders, that insouciant posture, those ears...I would commit rithsharsha (sp?) with this being....

      --
      teleny, friend of cats.
    2. Re:Hype! I bought Jar Jar boxer shorts already. by Stormgren · · Score: 1

      Rishathra, I think is the correct spelling. Damn, I haven't heard that term in YEARS.

      --

      "All those tubes and wires and careful notes!"

  9. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So tell us, what kind of "pleasure" do those "toys" really bring you? Just kidding.

  10. well arent we biased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think the Stern show is all about lesbian jokes and the such, your sadly mistaken. From what I heard of his criticism, he didn't like the obviousness of the cg characters, throughout the movie the actors weren't even looking anywhere NEAR where the cg characters were supposed to be standing...and the plot was lacking, i.e: it was pretty to look at, but not much else. I've never seen such a bunch of guys so offended by sexual comments...mebbe it's cause you're not getting enough pink?

  11. Decent MPEG Video Player for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or maybe the Mpeg TV serial code...anyone?


    or maybe a real mpeg player with no problems with the matrix1.mpg

    1. Re:Decent MPEG Video Player for linux by gklyber · · Score: 1

      MPEG TV is only $10 to register. If you'll use it, buy it. Support good software for Linux!

  12. 9/10 Reviews say the Move Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    No Memorable Characters!

    No Romance!

    No Witty Dialog!

    No Interesting Plot Twists!

    Annoying Computer Animated Rat Dog!

    Card Board Bad Guy!

    Special Effect Only Redeeming Quality!

    This move is going to be the biggest flop ever.

  13. Suicide as last resort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've watched the first 3 about 26times each.

    You have a lot of time to waste. It must be boring as hell to be you?

  14. Re:Lucas is the evil empire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, not quite. The money Lucas has made on things like Special Edition and pre-Episode I merchandising was largely used to fund the production of Episode I. Similarly, his take of Episode I returns is mainly going to fund Episode II, and so forth....

    I am quite amused by the fact that this is technically an indie film. :-)

  15. Silly reply needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me! But this poll didnt have a silly answer! What is going on here?


    I say 'Tangerine'!

  16. Re:marketing machine in full gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Heck, Star Wars invented the concept of mass-marketing film merchandise.

    Umn, no. The "Planet of the Apes" merchandising was in full monstrous swing in the mid-70's, just in time for Star Wars to take advantage of the idea. Apes merchandise was the nominal originator of the tie-in scheme. Sorry....

  17. Spielberg cashing in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....so that he can fund his deep black project that nobody will talk about (least they get kicked off the ranch) and that is being overshadowed by all the current media hype over a flawless execution of that which shouldn't have been executed.

    ...comming soon, in the next 5 years, to a theater near you!

    Hey, sometimes you gota' produce crap to get gold!

  18. Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except Titanic sucked and wasn't grossly overhyped until AFTER it was released. I refuse to watch that movie because of all the lemming-like hype surrounding it and I refuse to go see Star Wars in the theater either. I'll just wait until the movie comes out on video.. probably July 1999 after everyone realizes it's not the panacea it was made out to be and it goes straight to video after a few weeks in the theaters. ;-)

    1. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So according to you, the movie sucked because the herd said they liked it. You, through some Mary Mary Quite Contrary logic, say "Since the herd liked it, I must NOT like it to preserve my individuality!" Somebody else is still controlling your preferences."

      I get accused of this as well and well, it just ain't so. That there is a mass following does trip warning flags, but not an instant automatic negative reaction.

      I can only speak for myself, but what I suspect is being said is: The hype alone has already made me sick of it. I'll wait and see it *on my terms*.

      Fwiw, if you like it, fine. But that doesn't mean I have to like it and follow it unthinkingly.

      I may see it..I may not. But I make that decision myself.

    2. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utter bilge!

      As a friend summed it up:

      Even the best tasting meal isn't enjoyable
      if someone is ramming it down your throat.

    3. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned straight!
      But I do hope TPM skull-fucks Titanic at the box office...

    4. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is my 'plan' as such. I decide.

      But it does get tiresome being what happens
      to be a total immersion society (or close)

    5. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

      Are you on some kind of medication? Do you honestly believe that the movie is going to be out on video by July 1999? Maybe you will be one of the warez kiddies who will be downloading a crappy VIVO version of the movie come July 1999.

      It is funny how people try really hard to BE different from the rest of the world. I mean, does it really mean that much to you that you want to sacrifice the opportunity to see the movie the way it was meant to be? I am going to see the movie on the very first public showing in my city and I will be one of the several hundred people chanting the Imperial Death March song while waiting in line for the auditorioum to open. This is an experience that I have missed out on when I was a child when the first Star Wars came out because I was too young to be admitted to a movie theatre even during the showing of RotJ in the early 80's. I wish they would let me take my 4 year old son for TPM but I guess he'll have to wait until Episode II or Episode III to get that experience.

    6. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So according to you, the movie sucked because the herd said they liked it. You, through some Mary Mary Quite Contrary logic, say "Since the herd liked it, I must NOT like it to preserve my individuality!" Somebody else is still controlling your preferences. Me, I watched Titanic, thought it was a relatively not awful movie, and ground my teeth every time I heard Celine Dion wailing (which would have happened with or without the big boat).

      I've got 2 tickets for TPM, and I'm giddy like a schoolgirl, and it has NOTHING to do with what the herd thinks, thank you very much.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So don't let them. Don't believe the hype. George Lucas isn't exactly sitting on your chest with a plunger, you know. Why do you let PepsiCo decide whether or not you're going to enjoy a given movie? If you want to go see it, do so. If you don't, don't. Nobody's forcing anybody to do anything.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The decisions become more difficult, maybe, but it's still our responsibility as sentient beings to make them, rather than default to the popular viewpoint.

      Now that I've seen the movie twice, I can safely tell you that it NUKED Titanic's happy ass, but that's just my opinion.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Star Wars TPM == Titanic by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Now I understand waiting for a month or so to see the movie. I really don't care all about the hype either, and I would have waited had not a friend bought me tickets for opening night.. :)))
      But what I don't get is the need to wait all the way until its out on video where you loose the quality of the THX experience, just so you can "be different" I support being different as much as the next guy, but unless you just so completly don't care about this movie that you feel the special effects would be waisted on you I would see the movie in the theators.. If nothing else than for the special effects. It may just be me, but I have a certain appriciate for the big screen experience, that just can't be duplicated at home

  19. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damnit, But that Pizza HUT Chick Was HOT! HOT! I mean I would sleep with her in a momment.

  20. Oh yea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to Hitler. The press has REALLY bashed him over the last 50 years. ;-)

    1. Re:Oh yea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The press hasn't hurt hitler too bad. He is ultra famous and has hundreds of thousands of followers world wide, even today. (I am not one of them)

      Hey, did you know they are keeping his brain alive inside a jar? It was in the midnight star!

  21. Wow this might actually fill the Cinema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Berlin .de,
    we have the Zoo palast it has somewhere
    from 1200-1400 seats (yes you can ocassionally get a glimps from the backrows) SW might actually be the first movie to have it sold out for more than half a week. I WANT TO OWN A CINEMA!!!!!
    PMK

  22. Re:Wakko's Wakko Wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Always!

    Indeed it will. Now that I could see lining up
    for. Camping? Maaaaybe.

    That is if the Giant Chickens at WBoo have
    the sense to release WWW properly. (Full theatre).
    --
    Vakko

  23. Re:PSX Modchips make VCD's playable?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, a proper standalone VCD player manuf in China will only set uback some $90-100US.
    Oriental Hero

  24. Getting enough pink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be the most absurd euphenism I've ever heard. Personally, I DO get enough grapefruit in my life, thank you very much *gryn*. I also get enough medium-rare steak, which is nice and pink on the inside. Personally, I've never cared for the color pink, but I get enough pink for me.

    The absurdist Anonymous coward - who stood in line for 21 hours, but also now has tickets at the best theater in town for the midnight show.

  25. Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont care how good it is with all the hype and nonstop promotion.I am going to pass on this one.
    Capitalism's ugly redhaired step children(advertisers and marketing types) are pushing this movie way to hard.If it was a really good movie we wouldn't need all the hype.
    Besides Lucas is turning into the movie equivalent
    of Bill Gates .

  26. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given any number of points during the day, I'd say "All of the above".

    Pissing me off: Everyone saying "Oh you can't criticize Lucas. It's HIS movie. It's HIS Star Wars universe. It's HIS dream. It's HIS story. Shut up. It's our money and without it, Star Wars wouldn't have become the huge commercial and cult success that it is. The reason we put our money into it is because it captured our hearts and imaginations, and we responded the only way a good American consumer would: we pulled out our wallets. No one movie can be safe from criticism, no matter how large the budget or the ego of the producer. The new trilogy should be able to stand on it's own, and not on it's hype. Time will tell.

  27. Re:Thank you for the spoiler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very nice of you to name one of the characters
    in the movie. Thank you.
    I did not want to know that!

  28. reusable content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I could take this more seriously if Lucas were more oriented towards his original goal of all of the movies done in a short period of time. On the current timeline his actors get too old too fast to ever be interwoven properly.

    Someday, when they are doing other installments, not to mention video games, digital books, etc., etc. they're gonna wish they had more never-yet-seen footage beyond outtakes. Wasn't that supposed to be part of the process of medium-independent content?

    *IF* he were shooting "extra" footage right now of all those folks (especially his young Anakin) I would take the Lucasfilms hype about creating new legends with a smaller mountain of salt.

    Rustin the Content Geek (accountless due to corporate moronitude)

  29. Duh - mplayer.exe or xing (win32) or mpegtv(linux) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't waste your money a vcd player or the addon for psx.

    I don't think it's a regional thing. It's all 1's and 0's when it comes down to it. There's nothing anyone can do to stop it.

    And I don't think anyone would argue that an MPEG can ever touch going to the theater.

  30. personal recommend: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like you need to go see Neon Genesis Evangelion.

    1. Re:personal recommend: by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

      I'll second that, simply for the sake of advocating Evangelion. :-)

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
    2. Re:personal recommend: by angelo · · Score: 1

      And i'll Third it.

      Evangelion has a great storyline.

      and weird aliens.

      Oh, and Add sailor moon to that pile!

      But the best is bubblegum crisis for cool action.IMO.

  31. This comment does not deserve a -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Anonymous Coward wrote:
    "I think Lucas is getting too serious about Making money on this.. I mean we really should just not go see the movie.. I mean how serriously good could it be.. We remember how bad Howard the Duck was.. Could lucas get any better since that?"

    This is a acceptably written commentary which has been marked down simply because its negative attitude toward Star Wars. And I agree, Star Wars was just an awful film. Even in the genre of fantasy/science fiction, Star Wars is a lame movie. Compare it to 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanly Kubrick), Alien (Ridley Scott), Blade Runner (Ridley Scott), Brazil (Terry Gilliam), or City Of Lost Children (Jeunet & Caro).

    Face it: George Lucas is out of his leage here, the guy can't direct his way out of a cardboard box. He never could: anyone here ever actually try to sit through THX-1138? It's horrible.

    Folks, I was a child of nine when the original Star Wars was released, and honestly at the time I LOVED IT! But after recently seeing it again as an adult I now know why my parents refused to see it twice: IT SUCKED! Which goes to show that this spaghetti western serial, without any pretensions to serious filmmaking, attracts children's eyes like moths to a bug zapper; lets hope the result isn't the same for those children and their mental health later in life.

    Hell, look at those adults who today flock and flood to the show, and especially those who "Feel the Force" like the film was some modern day religious testament with biblical overtones -- they should introduce themselves to a good psychiatrist. Hell, it's nothing more than eye candy, a visual rollercoaster ride covered by fresh paint over a rusting interior. A story with the intelligence of a 1930's Tarzan matinee, at the cost exceeding most third world countrys' entire health care budget. This AC is right: don't spend your money on this CRAP! Do something useful with your time instead.

    I'm anonymous here because I know this comment will get marked down and that will affect my score average. And isn't that LAME? Slashdot moderators are making too many moderation judgement calls based on personal opinion. Do you really think his post meets this quideline from The Slashdot Moderaors Guide?:

    "3.Bad Comments are flamebait. Bad comments have nothing to do with the article they are attached to. They call somone names. They ridicule someone for having a different opinion without backing it up with anything more tangible than strong words. Bad comments are repeats of something said 15 times already making it quite apparent that the writer didn't read the previous comments. They use foul language. They are hard to read or just don't make any sense. They detract from the article they are attached to."

    Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:This comment does not deserve a -1 by doom · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why the moderator marked it
      down, but I can kind of understand why.

      I mean, look at the criteria you quoted:

      > They call somone names.

      "Lucas is a wimp" qualifies.

      > Bad comments are repeats of something said 15
      > times already making it quite apparent that the > writer didn't read the previous comments.

      Bordeline, IMO.

      > They are hard to read or just don't make any
      > sense.

      This is the big one. Many sentences are just
      too hard to parse. I don't know what the
      author is getting at.

      > They detract from the article
      > they are attached to.

      On the other hand, this doesn't apply, because
      it's impossible to detract from this idiotic
      topic. The real mystery is why any moderator
      would waste time on this discussion.

  32. Voting option: Its all Rob's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really it is. He keeps posting Star Wars links here. AND /.'s go to them. Not to mention the sheer awesome power of /.

    Ergo: Its all Rob's fault.

  33. Re:Lucas ~ Gates? wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you=someone who just takes things to seriously.

  34. Re:Bah...Lucas spews pablum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh...Of course it will be sickenly sweet...that's
    the point of this first movie in the trilogy.

  35. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm...
    Let's have a look at the main criticisms of Microsoft:

    1) They're just too damn big, too damn rich, too damn glitzy, too damn hyped, and too damn influential. Probably the most commonly heard criticism, but also the least significant (based on a heuristic fear of power, rather than a specific problem).

    2) Anti-competitive practices. Microsoft often employs tactics to kill off competition through encroaching their markets, with limited or no upside to MS or customers (see for instance, Embrace & Extend). Similarly, MS employs FUD tactics to kill off competition, which are effective, but unethical and unpolicable. Because of its size, MS does too good of a job of killing its competition.

    3) Quality of product. MS products (namely 95 and NT) are often criticized for being very buggy, and also for wrapping system functionality in such a way as to limit the control that power users have over the system. Not so much of a problem on its own - normally, competition allows users to select another option - but when combined with #2 above, the low quality of MS products becomes more significant. Even with the option of a free operating system like Linux, MS's influence still applies to some proprietary hardware and software, making MS necessary in in some cases.

    Now, compare. #1 applies to Star Wars. #2 certainly doesn't. For #3, we'll have to wait to see the movie to find out, but without #2, #3 isn't much of a concern.

    So anyways, you can go ahead and call Lucas the next Gates. Sure, they're both huge. But so long as Lucas doesn't stoop to the anti-competitive practices that MS employs, you can't really accuse him of the demonism that comes out of Redmond.

  36. Re:Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be: "I think you should shoot lawyers on sight before they've taken any actions"?

  37. I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they have really ruined this movie. I would be happy if I never heard anything about that damn movie and then all of a sudden they announce that in one week there is going to be a star wars prequel. That would be pretty cool.

    1. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you, watching all the hype and getting every bit of info as I have is painful cause I'm reduced to counting the MINUTES till I get to see it now. Man, you ever wanna see time move slow try that. I'm so hyped up I can't wait. Anyway, the hype is definitly deserved, but that doesn't mean it should be there. I agree that it all of the sudden appearing a week from now without any prior knowledge would kick ass.

  38. I want to wait for it to come out on tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but I will go jsut because I have been brainwashed like all of you and because being brainwashed is fun.

    No seriously after reading the critics I understand the movie sucks.. But I will go,I don't care the Matrix was it.

    marc

    1. Re:I want to wait for it to come out on tape by the+ignorant+masses · · Score: 1

      --::No seriously after reading the critics I understand the movie sucks::--

      If I had a nickel for everytime I saw a movie I loved, yet the critics said sucked....... I'd be a rich man.

      -Sarkis-

      --
      "Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
  39. Re:Are you really playing with toys!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does anybody ever told you that toys are for kids? Unless you are a retard, but what are you doing on a Linux-oriented forum then?

    Whoever instilled the idea that "being a grown-up means you stop having fun" in you should be beaten to death.

    Creativity, imagination, and FUN do NOT end with your 18th birthday.

    I truly pitty you.

  40. RIGHT on the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree. Everyone has to REALLY loosen up. I'm having fun. My friends are enjoying themselves. And, unlike other merchandise tie-ins, I really don't care. TPM has been just an exciting rollercoaster ride since last year (if not since the series began, I suppose), and for once I just want to shut the FUCK up and enjoy it. I'm TIRED of hearing people complain about "the money grubbing hype machine".

    On a related note, another problem people don't realize is -- it was mentioned in an article in a magazine (which one, escapes me), that Lucas has an ORGANIZATION of people who take care of things like the tie-ins and legal woes. It's not him SPECIFICALLY, though I'm sure he could if he wanted to. :/

  41. Re:How about simply: let's let this planet go to h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think you've answered your own question. Bombs are falling, politicians have no morals, kids are killing each other in schools, and people care more about a movie than any of these things. That's what's wrong.

    Oh would you please fuckin spare me your guilt inducing drivel? People having things IN COMMON are a great way to get people TOGETHER. Bombs are NEGATIVE. Immoral politicians are NEGATIVE. Shootings are NEGATIVE. Star Wars is a POSITIVE thing. Instead of people getting together to mourn their lost loved ones, they're getting together to watch something they've been waiting over 10 years for. Yet you'd DENY them this pleasure? You'd deny them the JOY that it brings them? IS THAT SO FUCKING BAD?

    People have completely lost perspective on what's really important. Instead of wasting a week for tickets just to be first to see the stupid movie, that time could have been spent helping people that don't even have enough money for food.

    You first. You KNOW you're not going to do it. That was extremely weak. Most people don't make annual trips to the homeless shelter. You imply that suddenly, rather than indulge in a rare FUN MOMENT, they should go and head on down to the shelter and cook some cabbage for gramps. While it's a very NOBLE thing to do, and something more people probably SHOULD be doing, to try to say that their time would be better spent doing that is totally insane. If it's not in their nature to do it any other time, why now? To make YOU feel better?

    I bet there are probably homeless people who want to see TPM too. Why not take someone like them to a dinner and a showing of TPM?

    There's nothing wrong with seeing the movie. I'm going to go for sure. But why let it rule our lives?

    Can't people have ANY fucking fun? Why must you, and others like you, SUCK THE LIFE out of anything IRRATIONAL (my goodness!) that might make them happy? It's not HURTING anyone. It's not destroying the environment. It's sure has hell not forging wars with foreign countries. Now who's lost perspective? Ragging on a move that's making a lot of people HAPPY. There are MORE IMPORTANT topics to bitch about.

    It's just a movie. Nothing more.

    I've never really seen anyone who is implying more than that.

  42. There is better stuff to watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such as Ed Wood movies. Same quality of script but much cheaper to produce and far more fun to watch! ;-)

  43. PepsiCo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, what the heck does Colonel Sanders, that hot Pizza Hut chick, and Gidget (the Yo Quiero Taco Bell dog) have to do with Star Wars anyway? Does Col Sanders use lightsabers to chop chicken, or the Pizza Hut chick to slice pizza?

    1. Re:PepsiCo by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      PepsiCo gave LucasFilm (or whoever) $2 billion for marketing rights in the food and drink category. They will figure something out. Hell, the Episode 1 Mountain Dew bottles are "collectible", whatever the hell that means these days.


      ...phil

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  44. Re:Thank you for the spoiler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well! :} It's not like the name tells you anything about the plot...

  45. Re:Whats Everyones Problem with RotJ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what everyones problem is with Return of the Jedi.... I like it considerably more than The Empire Strikes Back. Anyway, I think Lucas is the man and that Star Wars deserves the hype. Although I'm prepared to be dissappointed by this movie, its STILL Star Wars, and the saga itself rules. I got my 26 Opening Day tickets :)

  46. Re:Are you really playing with toys!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody ever told you that toys are for kids? Unless you are a retard, but what are you doing on a Linux-oriented forum then?

    Linux is for kids.

  47. Re:Because May 20th has to come.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and those of us who are going to *see a movie*, not regain our lost childhood will have to put up the endless whining of the people criticising every small flaw in it. Will I be going to see it? Yes, but with the expectation of a good movie, not with the expectation of seeing the second coming.

    Then you'll be disappointed, because it looks as if it's not going to be a very strong film. The thing it has to offer is going back; if you don't want that, it's just another film with a predictable plot.

  48. Yes, pissing me off !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is pissing me off is the bunch of richies going nuts and spending hundreds of dollars to see eyes-candy-no-story movies and buying lots of useless toys while they could donate that money to the people stuck in the war, and the bigots at the pentagon killing thousands inoscents human beings then telling to the press that is like playing Nintendo. Well I am going of topic, anyway I think you get the point.

  49. Ho hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past, when a new Star Wars or Star Trek movie appeared it was an exciting event. But these days I'm just not interested. This is partly due to rising ticket prices and shrinking screens, but to a large extent it just seems as if this has all been done before. Looking at the Phantom Menace trailer on television I see nothing new or different to attract me to this film. I might as well just play the Star Wars videos I already have. It would be better if Lucas started over with a whole new universe. I'm going to wait for this film to come out on television. In the mean time, I hope somebody finishes the artificial intelligence film that Stanley Kubrick was working on when he died. Now that's something I'd really like to watch.

    1. Re:Ho hum by razorwire · · Score: 1
      Ummmm......

      Star Trek movies released since 1977: 9

      Star Wars movies released since 1977: 4

      Not sure how you can equate these. Paramount's been churnin' out the Trek as fast as they can, while Lucas has released nothing truly new since Jedi. It's been a longer (and more agonizing) wait for TPM. I just hope it doesn't suck...

      In any case, I've got my ticket, I'll be experiencing TPM in less than two hours, and I'm seriously psyched. =^)
      --

  50. killing innocent people?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in Kosovo and my family was killed by Serb Nazis.
    I saw my daughter executed and my baby drowned in my bathtub.
    I am writing this on a Libretto notebook with a cell phone. I have been waiting at this checkpoint for over a week. They have not admitted me because I don't have 200 DM... America tries to save me while you try to undermine it.
    -Demirelli Vyadavic

  51. Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tonight is the night. I have tickets to the first showing of it here in AZ and hype or no hype I'm going.

  52. Steal from Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steal from Lucas? Hello? What the hell are you thinking! He has more money than he will ever be able to use; a few bootleg copies will not change that.

    ---------------
    "Try thinking!"

  53. Re:Same crap as the first three by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Star Wars plot is pure crap.

  54. No --> Gates:software::Spielberg:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spielberg is the monopoly who shoves myth down our throat; Gates is the monopoly who shoves junk down our throat. Lucas' "THX911" or whatever (i ferget the zact name) is a brilliant movie!

  55. Fanny and Alexander Hype! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish Bergman got the same hype! Anybody out there see "Pell the Conquerer?"

  56. SLASHDOT HYPOCRITES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up until very recently, Slashdot was a chief purveyor of Star Wars hoopla!

  57. Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't go see the movie. It licks. The dialog blows. The ONLY thing it has going for it is the fight scene between Darth Maul, Ob Wan and that other guy. It licks guys. Its worse then spice world.

  58. costed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    costed is not a word, bucko. and all this SW:TPM hype was uncalled for. i was somewhat impressed with the screening i saw the other night, but not the "best movie of the century" hype that everyone, including lucas himself, made the movie out to be. austin powers 2 will probably be better.

    1. Re:costed? by NYC · · Score: 1

      Oops, I forgot I can't mention that I (can be) a moderator. Well, someone bumped my post to -1. I guess someone is moderator happy today.
      --Ivan, weenie NT4 user, Jon Katz hater: bite me!

      --
      --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
      "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
    2. Re:costed? by stimpy · · Score: 1

      You can't anyway, unless you're admitting that you're a moderator, which would get the privilege taken away...*evil grin*

  59. zero day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mark my words... SW:TPM will hit the wirez on May 19th before midnight.

    1. Re:zero day by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

      of course :P
      0day pirates are nothing if not prompt

      --
      -dk
      Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  60. Reagan's Star Wars Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The exact quote:
    "Amount the Pentagon will spend this year on its Ballistic Missile Defense or "star wars" program : $4,166,000,000"

    Key words: "this year"

    Last time I checked, Reagan had not been in office since Bush's inauguration in January, 1989.

    Also, last time I checked, the President has veto power. Our CURRENT president approved this expenditure.

    So is it ok now?

  61. Re:MovieFone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (from the Netcraft engine)

    www.moviefone.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) on Solaris

  62. Telco Load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They do what is referred to as "call gaping" which means they drop calls. I've seen a DMS-250
    brought to its knees by a massive influx of 800 calls. Dropping the calls was the only way to keep the switch from crashing.

    1. Re:Telco Load by Narbo · · Score: 1

      A bit more technical explanation cause I have
      nothing better to do: :)

      Once the SS7 traffic gets too heavy (i.e massive
      ISDN-UP requests from incoming calls) the switch
      will go into congestion mode and start dropping
      requests. ISDN-UP (which contains the call
      setup/takedown stuff) is among the first stuff
      to go. I think SCCP (which is the 800 stuff) is
      pretty low priority as well. There are several
      congenstion levels which ramp up what gets dropped.

      You can also get a call nixed if the switch
      is out of trunks to carry it, but in that case
      you usually get a recorded message.
      Lastly, I dont think the switch will crash.
      Calls not getting through, sure. Switch dead,
      requires reboot, no.

      Ah, for the days of working as a Nortel intern. :P

      -N

  63. No copies? Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight.

    Lucas expects a few lawyers with big talk and the FBI computer crime lab (I'm sure they have nothing better to do, they'll probably be watching the movie at the time...) to prevent hacking on the most hyped Geek Movie in human history by potentially hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of rabid fans.

    If you think Star Wars is _not_ going to be pirated, there is a bridge I would like to sell you. There are going to be dozens, if not hundreds, of copies of the pirate available. I bet if you look hard enough, you can find a pirate copy _now._

    *whistles innocently, smiling* O:)

    This getting the FBI involved before the fact is just further proof that Lucas's Ego must be stopped before it destroys Tokyo.

    The best Lucas can hope to do is to just deal with the fact that his movie is going to copied. He's going to make, quite possibly, billions on this movie, before it even goes to videotapes. Pirated movies _might_ take 0.001% profits off the movie, since only the most die-hard wired fans are going to bother with a two-day download of a small movie. The real pirates are the ones that sell tapes on the street corner, not the ones who watch a movie they have already seen in the theater on their computer and advertise the movie for him.

    If Lucas didn't want piracy, he shouldn't have hyped it so. Hype has a way of drawing that kind of element to itself. If you say, 'This is the greatest movie of all time,' don't be surprised when _other_ people come out of the woodwork to cash in.

    He should also be working on the next film... considering the kind of cash cow he's got, he should be milking it more.

  64. Re:But It's a TRAILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the trailer that Lucas is concerned about. It's the distribution of the full movie. No sites which contain the trailer have been contacted, or are expected to be, according to the article (did you read that part? or are you just responding to the headline?).
    I think Lucas has a point, especially as someone here has noted regarding quality concerns. But I don't see unauthorised sharing (the more correct term for "piracy" as suggested by RMS) as a bad thing for anyone involved.
    Lucas will still get mega $$$s from all the people who want to see it in the theatres, from merchandising, and from "legit" home copies (and gives him more incentive to put out the DVD's BEFORE all of the prequels are released).
    Just my $0.02

  65. Re:Dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's not about the quality of the media copy; it's about the quality of the viewer. Today's home viewing technology is simply not sufficient to adequately enjoy a fullscreen cinema event. It may be in future. However, for now it is woefully inadequate.

    Even most movie theatre auditoriums are woefully inadequate or at best 'barely adequate'.

    This is simply not something that can be replicated with a TV or projector and a surround sound system no matter how good the dupe is.

    Lucas's own adds for the Special Editions bragged upon this fact.

    When you can get the real thing, an incomplete copy is nothing more but a very effective teaser.

    Pirating is only an issue for those for which the theatrical release is a form of restriction to access to information. Draconian attempts to stop bootlegging during a theatrical run do serve to make Lucas appear Gates-esque. If all a certain part of the market are interested is early access to information then $8+ per nose per viewing is infact highway robbery for that tasteless segment of the population.

  66. $4.15Billion vs. $4.5Billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A lot of that 4.5 Billion went overseas to toy
    manufacturers. OTOH, There wasn't much hardware,
    but lots of jobs and research from the $4.15
    billion to Reagan's Star Wars.

    I wonder which was the better investment?

  67. Fanatics won't admit it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even if the movie completely blows, no one that is so fanatical and that partakes in the hype so much is going to turn around and say "Yes, I admit, this movie sucked." I sure wouldn't.. that'd make me look like a fool for getting caught hook, line, and sinker. So I expect even if it does suck (which it will from everything I've heard so far) people will simply swoon over this movie and throw their money at it based on hype and brand recognition alone. If this movie had come out 25 years ago it would have flopped.

    1. Re:Fanatics won't admit it sucks by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by stodge:

      But it's going to suck anyway. There is no way that it can live up to the expectations. I know this is probably a load of bollocks, but the media are saying that previews aren't too positive, and that the kid is crap.

      I'm going to see it for the entertainment factor alone, not because I'm a Star Wars nut. But I can't (unfortunately) see it living up to the hype (which Im sick of). But I hope it blows Titanic out of the water!

  68. s/Lucas/Hollywood/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and then you're right.

  69. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    ...it's more likely to make me puke than it is to make me eat in those places.

    If you really want to puke; eat in one of those places.

  70. There's 2 matrix MPEGs. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    The crappy Telesync version (that you're talking about) and the very high-quality screener version. I've seen them both, and the screener really does look nice. Definitely worth the download if you're on a T3 or better.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  71. But It's a TRAILER by jandrese · · Score: 3

    I'm confused why people are so worried about distribution of the trailers. I thought the whole point of the trailers was to advertise the movie, so the more copies of the trailers you have floating around, the more advertising the movie gets. (Like Star Wars needs more advertising). Why would you want to restrict your advertising by prosecuting all of the people who mirror your trailer for free?

    I also don't understand the comment in the article about "forstalling" the piracy of the second trailer by having it available only on their website (http://www.starwars.com). I don't see how that forstalls anything (except that their server was completely overloaded and slower than molassass).

    With that said, I do agree with him about people who pirate the entire movie. Not only do they steal from Mr. Lucas, but they also tie up a lot of bandwidth that people could otherwise use to read Slashdot. :)

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:But It's a TRAILER by dwdyer · · Score: 2

      Lucas' stated concern is that the pirates have no quality control. So when you see an MPEG of a trailer that's obviously shot with a smuggled video camera, you'll be fooled into thinking the movie's going to look the same way? I loved the first pirate trailer, as it had that community feel to it.

      The real issue is control over the trademarks and copyrights. If they don't show due diligence, they'll lose control over the merchandising rights, which is where the real money lies.

      -W-

      --
      -dwd-
    2. Re:But It's a TRAILER by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I'm confused why people are so worried about distribution of the trailers. "

      You can print a hella good bootleg poster
      from a 35mm trailer frame.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:But It's a TRAILER by yum · · Score: 1

      perhaps lucas has a deal with apple (sure looks like it. just look at apple.com) and it's apple who's trying to prevent anyone from using any other format.

  72. I called Cineplex by Aaron+M.+Renn · · Score: 2

    Here in Chicago Cineplex Odeon runs their own ticket line (312) 553-CINE. I was able to get through to that and buy tickets for the second showing of the day! I tried MovieFone by phone and web and was completely screwed every time. I wonder how the phone network held up under the load?

    1. Re:I called Cineplex by NME · · Score: 1

      It took me approx 20 minutes to get through, and then I could only order tickets at a theater on the other side of town due to 'technical difficulties'. Can't say I mind a 45 minute drive though. I'll just make a night out of it. -nme

  73. 5 words by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

    South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

    (ok, five words & an ampersand)



  74. McDonald's? by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

    I thought the licensing deal was with PFS(?)(the fast-food chains formerly owned by Pepsi...KFC, Taco BEll, Pizza Hut)

    Unless the overseas rights are different or something.

  75. Re:I'm curious... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Chimichanga:

    I know one place that has lots of piracy, the Philippines. I went there to do something for Intel, and I went to one of their video game stores and they were selling copied video games and copied dvd's. The copied dvd's were turned into vcd's which can be played by windows media player or put a modchip in your playstation. if he really wants to stop piracy, he should first start in the Philippines, the land of piracy.

  76. patience by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by AlexBanach:

    I'm as excited as the next guy, but long lines and crowded theaters make this a "wait for the video" situation. Plus, I've heard Lucas has made some hefty requirements for theaters to show this movie, ($$$). I'd rather not contribute to this type pressure when it basically says "even if this movies dissapoints, George will be richer".

  77. go to hell by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by heaven is falling:

    To the people who voted "deserved":

    If I could strangle you I would.

    1. Re:go to hell by the+ignorant+masses · · Score: 1

      The eloquence of this comment, combined with the magnifincant ability to combined meaning with shortness to get one's point across clear, quickly, yet emphatically, completely outstands and blows this reader's mind.

      -Sarkis-
      "Sarcasm isn't an ability, it's an artform"

      --
      "Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
  78. All Action - No Plot by emil · · Score: 1

    I saw Episode I this morning at 4 a.m. The title sums it up.

    I don't see how Obi Wan and Yoda could have such depth of character in the previous films, and yet the Jedi with whom we spent so much time in this movie can be so flat and lifeless.

    Good grief, if the emperor's lackey hadn't finished Liam Neilson, I would have done it myself. Lucas should try not to hire corpses for his leading roles in the future.

  79. Re:How about simply: `This Star Wars Hoopla is *fu by Namtilaku · · Score: 1

    Here Here! I second that motion! Even though i voted "it's pissing me off" you have an extremely valid point, one which made me change my mind about the whole thing (not easily done, mind you)

    david

  80. It's flamebait with a grain of truth by pingouin · · Score: 2
    No, Lucas is no Gates; I'm no Star Wars fan, but I liked his earlier, smaller films a lot.

    We bitch and moan about a glitzy, heavily-marketed OS, and its associated products and FUD and such; some of us do the same about the "dumbing-down" implied by putting KDE or GNOME on top of Linux, but we don't do the same thing with popular culture. If we are excited over Lucas and Phish and EBM and Alcoholica and South Park (to name just a few examples over the past year or so), it shows me that many of us "haven't tried Linux", so to speak; it shows me that we grok the user-friendly, the glitzy, the hyped, the popular (either mass-culturally or subculturally so), and the shockful -- rather than take the time and "RTFM" concerning music and the visual/televisual arts. My pop-culture examples are not buggy like Win*, but they do come from a dominant platform (shared by a small set of large corporations, rather than a single one), and they have their various deficiencies (and I say that as someone who has enjoyed -- in small doses -- all of the aforementioned examples). I dunno. I have come to associate showbiz marks with WinDOS users, perhaps wrongfully so.

    A missive from the 2 department.

    --

    --

    --
    =8^

  81. Re:The odds of caring about H. Stern's review... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

    ..are about the same as the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field. :)
    After all, the man gets impressed by a skank throating a 3-foot kielbasa, and compares penis sizes on the air.


    Yeah, heaven forbid he might have an opinion that has nothing to do with the antics on his show.

    I find it hilarious, I was talking to a friend of mine who was reading an article about people who paid $500 to see the movie in advance, and THEY thought it sucked. (read: people who pay $500 to see a movie 2 weeks in advance are either big fans or fucking idiots) My friend brought out a rather interesting quote from the story too: "This movie is great if you're 12 years old"....



    Heresay at least from my viewpoint, but I'd consider the guy to be at least reputable in quoting news stories. I really can't wait until I see 500 slashdot comments, 90% of them saying "it sucked, I was so disappointed."

    The more disgusting fact is that most of the Star Wars freaks that I know wouldn't admit something like that if they were threatened with death... You know, the same people who still think Mark Hamill (sp?) has acting talent. :)

    -Erik-

  82. Re:The odds of caring about H. Stern's review... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

    What do you mean, you don't think Hamill has talent? He's great as the Joker on Batman:TAS...

    Hehe, I should have clarified... He is a rather talented voice actor, but his appearance in Wing Commander III was probably the hardest (visual) acting he's done in a while, and for good reason.

    -Erik-

  83. Re:Lucas v. Gates by elyard · · Score: 1

    Hell, even on Gate's own turf Lucas bested him: Pixar.

    Sorry to disapoint you, but Lucas doesn't own or run Pixar, and hasn't since 1986, right about the time when Steve Jobs founded the company. (Yes, that Steve.) What Pixar was before the sale to Jobs was a computer animation dept. of ILM.

    --

    .oO=----------------------=Oo.

    • IRIX, BeOS, and Mac OS.
  84. It is bastardizing it... by adamsc · · Score: 1
    I don't really understand how changing the file format the trailer is in is "bastardizing" it.
    Have you compared the quality? The conversions aren't as good and he's obviously very concerned about keeping quality up.

    Besides, it's his movie and his choice. You're more than welcome to film your own movies but you have no rights over someone else's work.

    1. Re:It is bastardizing it... by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      If Lucas is so concerned about keeping the quality up he shouldn't put it on the net in a format that everyone on the net can't view.

      I really don't understand this remark. If you are are using MacOS or Windows you can use official Apple tools to watch Quicktime movies. If you are using a form of UNIX you can use xanim to watch Quicktime movies. Who is it, exactly, who can't watch Quicktime? VT100 terminal users?

    2. Re:It is bastardizing it... by Jello · · Score: 1

      I am also more than welcome to change the friggin' file format. If Lucas is so concerned about keeping the quality up he shouldn't put it on the net in a format that everyone on the net can't view.

    3. Re:It is bastardizing it... by NickV · · Score: 1

      Actually, Quicktime 4 uses the Sorence (SP?) codec which unfortunately isn't supported by Xanim. I gotta admit though, that codec kicks serious ass. Not only is it 44.1khz stereo, but it also has amazing image quality. The trailer was 640x480, hiquality, stereo 44.1khz sound and only about 10 megs. I wish we'd get access to the codec for xanim!

      -Nick (vlkun@stuy.edu)

  85. You are not alone by Misagon · · Score: 1
    I am a computer science student, and I frequently have to spend time in computer rooms with other people whom I don't know. Some people frequently piss me off by playing the trailers over and over again. I am getting sick and tired of having to close my eyes and cover my ears every time I hear "Lukes theme".
    The worst part is that I live in Europe, and the movie will not be released here until August. Already, there is too much hype and merchandise everywhere, from McDonalds to every other toy store. (well, isn't that what McDonalds is to kids anyway...) There is no valid reason to release it late in my country (Sweden), it just has to be copied and subtitled. That process does not need three months. But, what scares me is that this could be only the beginning. When it escalates, I am going to turn my TV off and buy earplugs.
    My friends tell me that resistance is futile, but I still struggle.

    I am still standing by my thesis - I refuse to see the movie, until I go to see the movie!

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  86. Re:I'm curious... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    While it is a nice diversion (the MPEG version of The Matrix) if you have nothing better to do, all it really does by my estimation is give you a better appreciation for the theatrical original. This is most apparent NOW as this movie is still in it's theatrical run. This lead me to the conclusion that perhaps studios should actually do their video releases as they are showing these movies in the theatres.

    You see the dinky VHS/DVD/MPEG1 version after having recently seen the original and realize just how those ntsc videos are just no replacement for the real thing.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  87. Re:Lucas v. Gates by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Hell, even on Gate's own turf Lucas bested him: Pixar.

    George pushes the tech for the benefit of his art, Bill sandbags the tech for the benefit of his pocketbook. While Billy was still fuzting with DOS 1.x, George was giving us (indirectly of course) the Genesis Effect and starting a list of CGI credits longer than Bill's porfolio.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  88. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    This rather inflamatory flamebait subject is nearly completely off the mark. George has no delusions about being original or innovative (production tech excepted) and quite freely admits to recycling 3000 years worth of ideas and concepts from drama and mythology.

    There is also none of the 'if I buy this today will I be able to use foo tommorow' or 'everyone is buying foo so I will need to buy foo or be stuck with an unusable movie' sort of network effects that plague software.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  89. Re:The odds of caring about H. Stern's review... by Phil-14 · · Score: 1

    What do you mean, you don't think Hamill has talent? He's great as the Joker on Batman:TAS...
    Phil Fraering "Humans. Go Fig." - Rita

    --
    (currently testing something about signatures here)
  90. Star Wars by jd · · Score: 1

    The original trilogy was good, but IMHO slid off with each story. With the "updated" versions still missing the important dialogue (which made the dialogue that WAS there make sense), it's very clear that the next three are going to go the same way. They CAN'T recapture that magic, because I don't think George Lucas knows what the magic WAS.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  91. Re:I'm curious... by stux · · Score: 1

    Well...

    After seeing the matrix 3 times in the cinemas I hope you understand why I would watch it instead of going again to the cinemas... I mean... They are expensive,

    Yes I will buy the DVD the moment it comes out, in fact I'll get a DVD drive for it. But until then the VCD will just do :(

    --

    ---
    Live Long & Prosper \\//_
    CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
    Jedi & Last *-fytr
  92. Typo/Grammar error by Taliesin · · Score: 1

    I know this post will probably get demoted, but it really is just cost, not costed.

  93. Re:Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Jeff+Licquia · · Score: 4

    Quote, from the letter linked to on the page:

    "The Digital Millenium Copyright Act ("DCMA") requires copyright owners to notify internet service providers about infringing activities and about facts and circumstnaces from which infringing activity is apparent, and imposes the obligation on ISPs to remove or disable access to infringing materials. The information set out below provides you with the notice required under the DCMA with regard to unauthorized electronic files relating to the upcoming film _Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace_ ("Episode I"). It also includes information refarding infringment of trademarks relating to _Episode I_ resulting from the posting of illegal video recordings on the internet. We trust that you will act promptly to prevent this infringement."

    And later:

    "The information provided in this letter is accurate to the best of my knowledge and is provided under penalty of perjury."

    IANAL, but this sounds like the language for giving legal notice. (Not to mention that he says he's giving legal notice.) Exactly what is he "legally notifying" them of? That copyright violations are illegal? I think they already know that.

    Rather, this is an attempt to reinterpret the guidelines in the DCMA that address whether an ISP is guilty of contributory copyright infringement. This way, the rules that were set up to punish rogue ISPs that flaunt the law can be applied to any ISP that LucasFilm decides was not "diligent enough" in preventing violations.

    ISPs didn't want that language written into the law for good reason; this is it.

  94. Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Jeff+Licquia · · Score: 5

    Is LucasFilm's legal eagle team providing such a nice public service, educating the ISPs on copyright law? Don't bet on it.

    You know, I remember the copyright police saying that the DMCA would only kick in for ISPs after official notification for *specific* violations. In other words, you still can't be held responsible for copyrighted material on your site unless you're notified and refuse to take it down.

    Now LucasFilm is playing fast and loose with the rules and "informing" all ISPs of the "specific" violation that copying Episode 1 is illegal. This so that the hyperactive legal department at LucasFilm can kick in and sue under the DCMA the moment a file is found, without having to bother with the messy notification clause. After all, they've all been notified of the potential violation, so if a file is found, that must constitute refusal to remove it.

    This is the most blatant lawyer-screw I think I've ever seen. LucasFilm stands to make millions on the film, but that isn't enough; they have to twist the law to screw the poor hapless ISPs who happen to harbor a bad apple or two, or who are unlucky enough to get hacked by the wrong hacker.

    I hope they sue some ISP and lose, so that the language of the law gets some clarity in case history. And I hope the ISP they sue countersues, and gets a big chunk of those Star Wars revenues.

    1. Re:Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

      It sounds like ``infringing activites'' is in the present tense. That and the words, ``facts and circumstances'' and expecially ``apparent'' would seem to prevent them from doing this before-the-fact. I haven't read the DMA and IANAL though. After all, the ISP cannot ``remove or disable access'' to material that isn't currently in existence.

    2. Re:Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Gurney5 · · Score: 1

      I think you're reading a bit too much into it.

      News stories are often inaccurate, and it looks like this one is. Note that none of Lucas' lawyers say "We're going to immediately nail ISP's if they carry this." The story was merely explaining some of the law, and didn't explain it fully (big surprise).

      IOW, I don't think you should judge the lawyers' actions without them having made any actions.

  95. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by deanc · · Score: 1

    You know, I _like_ watching must-anticipated movies on opening night. It's great-- the audience is enthusiastic, it's fun to see all those people waiting with me, and yes, I get to say, "I was there when IT came out." The cost? About an hour and a half of my time standing in line (the theatre I went to was a bit off the beaten track). Sounds like a decent tradeoff to me. Surely it will be more worthwhile and lining up outside CompUSA at midnight to buy Windows 95.

    -Dean

  96. Star Wars Prequel hype v.s. Star Wars hype by substrate · · Score: 1

    In 1977 I was in grade five. I don't recall an inordinant amount of hype leading up to Star Wars. I remember rave reviews and almost an instant cult like following. Cult like in that just as people would go and see Rocky Horror Picture Show umpteen times they would also go and see Star Wars umpteen times. Obviously Star Wars was very main stream, but the following could best be described as a cult like following.

    I went to see it, I think I've seen it in the theater two times. It was a good movie. For the time the special effects were amazing. I've been in a variety of places in a variety of drunken states as its been played, but I really haven't watched it again. A few years later when it appeared on HBO and my parents had purchased a VCR I did record it, but mostly because it was hiliarious in fast forward or reverse.

    By then the quality of the special effects weren't as spectacular compared to other movies of the time. It was still a good movie though.

    This prequel is a bit different though, there is an amazing amount of hype being dished out in advance. I happen to be pretty hard for the media to get to since I don't watch a lot of main stream TV and find playing CD's in my jeep more interesting than listening to the latest Howard Stern impersonator during my drives to and from work. I still can't avoid the hype though. The front page story on the local fish wrap was a review of the movie. I didn't read it but I might later. I'd like to see if its a totally favourable review and if not how many letters to the editor are going to be published lambasting the reviewer.

    I will go and see the prequel. I'd like to say that I'll wait till the hype dies down, but I doubt if it ever will.

  97. Re:I Love You / I Know by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

    The interview said Kerschner "prodded" Ford to adlib,
    not that Kershner made it up himself.

    --

  98. Re:I Love You / I Know by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

    By the way, that is one of my all-time favorite movie lines! ;)

    --

  99. If Howie doesn't like it... by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

    it must be great!
    He wouldn't know talent if it bit him on his "private Parts".

    --

  100. Re:Vivoz by yootis · · Score: 0

    What does all this stuff mean?

    GCS d- s:+ a- C++ U*++++ P- L+ E W++ N++ o-- K- w O M-- V- PS PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D++ G+ e+++ h--- r++ z+++(*)


    Is there a FAQ somewhere?

  101. Re:I Love You / I Know by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    No, I think that Kirshner said that he liked it, and wanted to keep it, rather than follow the script.

    Ford is evidently a bit of a method actor - he ad libbed the bit in Star Wars where he talks over the intercom in the detention block, because it would then sound more like he really was making it up on the fly. Which he was....

    I think that's stuff that matters. ;)

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  102. Re:Vivoz by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1
    That is the Geek Code. Which is really due for an update...

    Anyhow the Geek Code can be found at http://www.geekcode.com/

    His code means:
    He's a Geek of Computer Science
    Dresses casually
    A bit fat, but not too much
    In his late 20's
    Heavily into computers
    A wicked Unix guru
    Not so big on Perl
    Thinks Linux is okay but not amazing
    Uses emacs
    Uses the web a fair bit
    Reads some newsgroups
    Loathes the usenet oracle
    Is not enlightened about Kibo
    Uses Windows but doesn't like it
    Didn't care about OS/2 either
    Hates the Mac (Between this and his Linux score we can tell he's a no-goodnik ;)
    Likes Unix better than VMS
    Apolitical
    Financially conservative (pro taxes, pro welfare, anti military spending)
    Interested in cypherpunk issues but no active
    Doesn't use PGP
    Likes Star Trek
    Indifferent to Babylon 5 (now we really know about the no-goodnik issue ;)
    Likes X-Files a lot
    Plays some RPGs
    Watches TV daily
    Likes to read but doesn't frequently do so
    Likes Dilbert
    Likes DOOM a good bit
    No longer so interested in the Geek Code
    Has an MA
    Married
    Gender undisclosed, but gets a lot of it

    My code can be decoded here

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  103. Vivoz by Frederic54 · · Score: 0

    George Lucas's take on piracy of Star Wars. Basically, he will be very angry and fight very hard (big surprise) against pirates

    i'm sure we'll find vivo files of phantom menace may 20th... on some irc channel, and on ftpsearch or others...
    --

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  104. I wonder... by Pascal+Q.+Porcupine · · Score: 1

    I wonder if people will go to the theatre for SW1 and, forgetting where they are, leave in disgust when they don't show the SW1 trailer before the film. :)
    ---
    "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.

    --
    "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
    Quine "quine?
  105. Re: Satire? by Glytch · · Score: 1

    I sense a fellow Discordian...

  106. Re:Suicide as last resort? by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Only 26 times each? I've watched the entire trilogy every weekend for as long as I can remember. It's no waste of time in my book.

    And no, I'm not seeing it opening night. I'm going to see it a week and a half later, so I can watch it with all my out-of-town friends. SW:TPM might be good and it might be bad, but one thing's for sure: It'll be *fun*.

    Cheers.
    -- SG
    "I'm not suffering from insanity. I'm enjoying every minute of it."

  107. PepsiCo paid 2.5 *Billion* $ for the right ... by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    ... to put the SW character on their product. PepsiCo also own Frito-Lays, KFC, Pizza-Hut, etc... so expect to see those familiar SW face on your bag of chips, your pizza box, your fried-chicken barrel, etc.

    This is not urban legend; this morning I catched an analysis of SW marketing on radio (CBC, serious stuff) where they were talking about the revenue model of the production. I just can't believe how much money they are gonna make with this one ...

    --
    :wq
  108. Music Video QT/AVI does anyone have mirror? by clintp · · Score: 1
    I've been looking for a mirror for the music video for about a week now and can't find one. Apple's site is lame to the point where I can't get the video to download, even with a cable modem.

    Anyone have a mirror? I've found the trailers mirrored, and even the TV commercials mirrored, but not the video.

    A little help?

    --
    Get off my lawn.
  109. Re:How about simply: let's let this planet go to h by Jason+Skomorowski · · Score: 2

    I don't think that people enjoying a fun piece of fiction is going to hurt such causes. If we want to hype it a bit, it's because it happens to have little bearing on reality, which you mentioned isn't necessarily always good. So what if many people relish a break from that?

    No matter what I do with my life, it is almost certain that I will not be able to change the nature of humanity. We don't really learn all that much from history. So, the point of life is obviously not to train future generations by example, since that's best done by bad example anyhow.

    Thus, it's really not all that important to care much about these things. Some people have been killing each other for a long time, when we recognise those people, we try to prevent them. We can't predict them all, but we can't do much better. Not that we shouldn't try, but we shouldn't stop enjoying life because more serious problems exist. Why worry about something you cannot affect?

  110. I'm AVOIDING the hype like the plague... by Token · · Score: 2

    I was there in '77...I saw the FIRST showing of A NEW HOPE on its first day in Toronto. Everybody knew it was going to be big, but basically that was all we knew. Not the stars, not the effects, not the sights or sounds or concepts. Nada. At least part of the movie's impact was that it all came as a wonderful surprise...and I am TRYING to recreate that feeling. It's damned difficult.

    I have not seen ANY of the trailers. I avert my eyes when a promo comes on at the theatres or on TV. I haven't read any of the articles about the move (tho' I have read a few about McGregor and Neeson in connection with the movie). I've glimpsed a few things, but not much.

    What is everybody thinking about this hype??? Does anybody seriously think that there is a single person in the world who won't see the damned movie if they don't get a preview of the highlights beforehand? I HATE spoilers...I haven't logged onto Ain't It Cool News for months to avoid any taint.

    I'm not gonna buy the books (print or colouring). I'm not going to buy the toys and souveneirs. I'm not going to buy a T-shirt or poster or any of the zillion and one bits of flotsam surrounding this movie.

    All I want is to be surprised and thrilled...just like I was the first time. But keeping my Phantom Menace virginity is an uphill battle, let me tell you.

    1. Re:I'm AVOIDING the hype like the plague... by NewTux · · Score: 1

      I saw the original in '77 also. I'm 46 years old now, have two sons (13 & 11) and will most definitely NOT be seeing it with them (Mom will go...). The original was excellent, Empire Strikes Back, also very good. Return of the Jedi bordered on ludicrous. I honestly have absolutely no interest, hype or no. Wish I did actually, but.........

      --
      Doobie doobie dooo....
    2. Re:I'm AVOIDING the hype like the plague... by DataSquid · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I've been trying not to get sucked in, because I know that it'll just dissapoint me in the end if I do. How can you match the dreams and expectations of Star Wars fans? The first movie was a milestone, and one hopes that this one will be as well. If only there wasnt this devoted cult of SW fans making headlines around the wold about wating in lines for months and selling their testicles to get good seats, we wouldn't have this problems.
      And then there was the mistake of having the advanced screenings for the press. If Lucas didn't care about the press' opinion, why allow them in? He knew that it wouldn't get glowing reviews. Of course this would just create bad publicity, but still.
      But to see Lucas complain that the hype has gotten out of hand, without his wanting, is laughable. There's 101 toys available at stores everywhere, Pizza Hut, KFC and Taco Bell have joined forces under the banner of Pepsi to fight the dark side in TV commercials everywhere (and recently started promothing their own line of 30 or so toys). Jeez George, if you didn't want this problem, why license out 8000 crappy promo tie-ins?

      --

      DataSquid.net, a little about me.
  111. Re:Got my ticket. 12:30 Wednesday Morning. by jlv · · Score: 1

    "I am your father" wasn't kept secret at all. The novelization came out over a month before the movie and I had already read it. Heck, the Menance novelization (by Terry Brooks... shudder!) has been out for almost 2 weeks, right?

  112. Re:If you think 5 or 6 dolars is bad... by JoelG · · Score: 1

    In Bonita Springs FL, it cost me 21 bucks for 3 tickets at $7 a pop, showing at 12:30 am on May the 19th. I guess the theatre has THX sound, but they sure don't advertise it.

    Why you ask did I buy the tickets so early? Because it adds to the excitement of the movie when you are half a sleep when it starts (That is if it is a good movie, if it isn't I can sleep through the entire thing justifiably :)).

    --
    Quandary in the Making
  113. Not here... by BigEd · · Score: 1
    I waited over seven hours yesterday only to see a mob of High School kids rush the front of the line causing utter chaos. By the time I finally got to the front (after waiting two hours in what can only be described as a weak mosh-pit) almost all of the shows were sold out. I know for a fact that some of the people behind me had camped out, and were going to end up seeing it on the 20th.

    Other theatres in town were just fine, this one, however, seemed to have no cap on the number of tickets one could purchase. One lady who was wearing a cap from a scalping agency walked off with a pile of about 80 tickets... About half an hour after tickets went on sale 12:01 seats were going for $25 (they're originally $7.50).

    The chaos caused by everyone rushing the box office two hours before it opened didn't help much either.

    --
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Not here... by griffjon · · Score: 1
      Here in Austin, the GateWay theater had an incredibly good line policy, and had some cops in just in case. I hear that even the people in the back of the line got tickets, if not for the midnight showing. I was in the third group from the front, and the major reaction to the opening of the ticket sales was cheering and positive enthusiasm.

      of course, it was a media event as well. About half and half news crews and up-and-coming film students (and anthropologists!!) getting gritty documentary film From The Line...

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    2. Re:Not here... by zagmar · · Score: 1

      Dude, the Riverside 8 had a short line. I got there at 12:30 and by 3:00 I had my tix: 1 for the 12:01 and one for 7:00 on Friday. Yeeuh. I think I'm going to write a review.

  114. 2 more months for us poor foreigners by Quark · · Score: 1

    The hype is really, really annoying me at the moment. Lucas decided to do a simultaneous worldwide merchandising launch, so over here in Ireland, the novel, screenplay and art/vehicles books are already out, but the film doesn't open until July 16th. Arrrrrggghhh!!!!!

    --

    --
    I've got green eyes, red hair, and I'm left handed. A hundred years ago, I'd have been considered in league with the De
  115. Piracy Paranoia by Ignatius · · Score: 2

    This whining about "theft" of copyrighted material really gets out of of hand. Calling the FBI to prevent some hardcore fans (those kind of people besieging cinemas for hours to get a ticket) from "stealing" a giga of thumbnailed mpegs with their 56k modems is just pathetic.

    If the launch of the movie would be somewhat syncronized over the world (here in Austria TPM will start in September(!)) nobody would bother for hours or days with downloading of what could at best be considerd a low quality preview. But I think Georg Lucas' marketriods can't stage the media and merchandising hype in more than one country a time.

  116. Haha! I saw it. by JerkBoB · · Score: 1
    Saw it this morning at 10am, EST. Went with my boss and coworker (gotta love small shops). We ordered tickets last night by phone, so no line-waiting.

    Did it live up to the hype? I dunno, I don't pay attention to such things. It was a cool movie. Was it high cinema? Blah... It never aspired to be.

    The F/X knocked my socks off. The story was pithy, but then all of the Star Wars movies were kinda corny. That's OK. If you go to Ringling Brothers expecting Cirque de Soleil, you're going to be disappointed. Otherwise, you'll have a good time.

    The pod race was incredible, and I got chills as the battle tanks crested the hill on their way down to the battlefield. Wow. Do not see this film in a theatre that's not equipped with digital sound.

    Ok, that's my vent for the day. I'll probably see it at least three or four more times. There's so much to see. It's a visual feast!

    --
    A host is a host from coast to coast...
    Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
  117. Re:marketing machine in full gear by carlfish · · Score: 2

    "A New Hope" wasn't "intelligent".

    It was exciting, it had swordfights, chase-scenes, and romance. It had Good and Evil, without shades of grey. It had borderline abysmal acting. It had whiz-bang special effects that made you think you were watching a real space battle. But it didn't exactly exercise those brain-cells.

    It was, as Lucas has said so many times, a Saturday morning movie for the kids. The fact that it was a damn good example of the genre, made squillions of dollars, and is still enjoyed by millions of people doesn't change that fact.

    Carlfish

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
  118. Costed is a word. by Emrys · · Score: 2
    Though it doesn't quite mean what Rob intended.

    Main Entry: 2cost
    Function: verb
    Inflected Form(s): cost; costing
    Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French coster, from Latin constare to stand firm, cost -- more at CONSTANT
    Date: 14th century
    intransitive senses
    1 : to require expenditure or payment cost more>
    2 : to require effort, suffering, or loss
    transitive senses
    1 : to have a price of
    2 : to cause to pay, suffer, or lose something cost him his job>
    3 past costed : to estimate or set the cost of -- often used with out

    Merriam-Webster

  119. Deserved...From a certain point of view by SupaFly · · Score: 1

    I love all the hype Star Wars is getting, but that's because I am a huge fan, and would be psyched if Lucas showed 2 hours of static on May 19'th. It basically breaks down to whether or not you're a fan. People either like Star Wars or hate it, and I can certainly understand how annoying all the hype can get if you don't give a damn. The simple fact of the matter is if you're a true fan, you'll love The Phantom Menace regardless of whether it sucks or not. And if you hate Star Wars...well, what can I say? You'll hate it. Either way, the hype will eventually end, and then everyone will be happy.

  120. Hype! Hype! by Accipiter · · Score: 0
    hype (n) : blatant or sensational promotion

    See Also: Star Wars Hype
    See Also: Star Wars Hype
    See Also: Star Wars Hype (Revisited)

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  121. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Accipiter · · Score: 1
    Complain all you want, but I'll watch it just to see the Pizza Hut Chiq.


    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  122. The Hype is Justified to an Extent by Grave · · Score: 4

    Ok, so people are already saying that this movie is going to be the best ever. Even I say (and truly believe) that it will be the most successful movie of all time. No other movie in history has ever completely sold out within hours in my city. Two theatres, 450 seats each, brand spanking new (opening Friday), eleven showings a day. That's 9900 tickets, SOLD OUT IN JUST THREE HOURS. Regardless of whether the movie actually blows (which I don't think it will), it will likely be amongst the highest grossing movies of all time.

    My second point is that anybody who trusts movie critics on ANYTHING is a fool. If I had seen every movie ever made for the past 25 years, I'd probably get kind of grouchy and picky about movies. I also have made it a point NOT to read ANY of the hype in magazines and such, simply because I knew that it might well ruin the experience if I already had every detail in my head. I have seen both trailers, the four commercials, have the official movie poster, have the soundtrack, and will probably be buying the new toys. I've read almost every single Star Wars novel published. I know what the general plotline is, but that does not make me any less excited to see it. If I had the money, I would have paid for those charity tickets to get to see it early. Above all else, I want to see for myself if Lucas is still the greatest mind in the movie industry. But don't render judgement on the movie until you've actually seen it.

    1. Re:The Hype is Justified to an Extent by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Also, if you'll recall (those of you who were old enough to read in 1975 or so. . . ), the critics also panned the original STAR WARS: I recall the bit about "space opera about a bunch of kids saving the galaxy". . .

      Plus ca change, plus ca meme. . . .

  123. Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Superdave · · Score: 4

    It seems to me that a community as intelligent and perceptive as the /. folks would see that Lucas has us all by the short and curlies, same as Gates has most of the non-technical lusers in the world. We are being manipulated and milked for our time and money, and we're letting it happen. How could the movie ever possibly live up to all the expectations that've been built up by all the hype? It can't. Why are we going to spend 5 and 6 dollars at a time for plastic toys worth less than a dollar? Why are we going to rush to the theatres, wait days and days in line, and spend 8 or 12 dollars a ticket, when in 3 months we can get in without waiting at all? To say "We were there when IT first showed"?? Big fuckin' deal. Theatres will probably run the damned thing until November, so what's the rush? And screw the whole merchandising monstrosity. Who thought I'd want to see lame-ass Darth Maul on my Mountain Dew bottle? He looks more like an ugly, angry circus clown with that ridiculous make up than he does a "ph33rs0m3 \/1ll41n". Vader was 10 times the villain this painted joke could ever be.

    /rant

    --
    --- --- --- Don't just do something! Sit there!
    1. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused.

      I have to have Windows because people pay me to use Windows, and because those people refuse to use any other OS. If people didn't pay me to use Windows, I would have an entirely Windows-free life.

      Do people pay me to see Star Wars? Of course not. If I want to make a living, can I make a living without Star Wars? Of course I can. Therefore, Star Wars doesn't have me by the short and curlies like Windows does; I can ignore it if I want, and I won't lose a penny by doing so.

      Personally, I may well never see it, and if I do, it will be when the hordes are gone.

      D

      ----

    2. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well shit. Client=climate. Shoulda used the preview button...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Moofie · · Score: 1

      61 whole minutes! I'm impressed with the restraint exhibited by the slashdot crowd. I figure somebody would've gone there much more quickly. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Lucas is to movies as Gates is to software by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Has me by the short and curlies? Are you MAD? He has a movie. I wish to see it. I'm willing to pay a couple bucks (the ticket I currently have in my wallet cost a friend of mine a four hours in line and cost me $4 and some undying gratitude) to watch his movie. He elects to only show this movie in theatres of sufficient quality to do justice to the hard work he and his company put into the film. That's fine...it's showing at all the good theaters (that is, the ones I'm accustomed to going to) here in town. He's licensed some manufacturers to make toys based on his IP. That's fine too, I've bought some of the toys and I feel that the pleasure they bring me is worth more than the money I paid for them.

      Lucas isn't coercing ANYBODY. The comparisons that some people insist on making ( X is like Bill Gates/Microsoft because they want to make money on their products and services), where X is Red Hat, George Lucas, or the fucking Easter Bunny are tired and pointless. Believe it or not, it is indeed possible in today's economic client to make money using good products, rather than shady business tactics. I've never seen CONCLUSIVE evidence that Lucas is anything more nefarious than a good storyteller, a savvy marketeer, and a zealous defender of his intellectual property. Hell, I wish I could be remembered that way!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  124. KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 3

    The worst is the ad with Col. Sanders, the Taco Bell Chihuaua, and the Pizza Hut girl driving down the freeway to save the Queen from Star Wars, that's the most shameless Star Wars tie-in I've seen, and it's more likely to make me puke than it is to make me eat in those places.

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

    1. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by jscott · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what Pizza Hut has _cute_ girls AND mid-riff baring uniforms?

      --
      signal, noise, to me it's all the same.
    2. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      Was in Taco Hell yesterday and just about went insane with the subliminal Star Wars endless loop muzak playing. Then there is the guy on a newsgroup selling tickets to episode 1 for $40 and they aren't even for the opening show!

      Enough Enough I refuse to see this picture until it is at at a place where beer is served.

    3. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Rage+Maxis · · Score: 1

      Speak Brother!

      Then again, I probably would actually piss myself laughing if we get another "Billy Madison" or "Office Space" in the theatre ... mmmm... alcohol-related-comedy-enhanced-pants-wetting.

      Ahhh.

      --
      --- ask me about nihilism, I will have nothing to tell you.
    4. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the ad is lame, but the Pizza Hut girl is cute!


      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    5. Re:KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      Sure as hell ain't in mid-Michigan.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  125. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by osjedi · · Score: 1

    Only quicktime? That is like giving away furniture for free but specifying that it _must_ be taken home in a chevy. Screw it. If he wants to give away content for free why should he care about the mode of delivery. Pirating something _not_ intended for mass distribution is wrong though - But this trailer is intended to be available for everyone.

    --
    -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
  126. I wanted to vote Tangerine by scrytch · · Score: 1

    tangerine!

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  127. It's only a movie by edhall · · Score: 1

    I'll only live about 700,000 hours, and although a new StarWars movie may be worth two or three of those, I feel like I've already come close to that even before it's been released.

    (Just my opinion, of course; someone who sees it two dozen times and has a lot of fun each time gets my respect for their intensity. But that's not me.)

  128. Cryptic error messages by NYC · · Score: 1

    "Failed to connect to server". Oh yeah, that's cryptic. Once again, fine writing by ZDNet.
    --Ivan, weenie NT4 user, Jon Katz hater: bite me!

    --
    --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
    "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
  129. marketing machine in full gear by tuffy · · Score: 2
    Heck, Star Wars invented the concept of mass-marketing film merchandise. It's to be expected we'll find Star Wars characters on the back of cereal boxes, on the sides of soda cups and on everything else conceivable. Hype alone will push the film to record-breaking profits on opening day. It's going to be the movie to see for some time to come, and rest assured we'll be seeing it everywhere.

    Will it be intelligent and interesting like the original ("A New Hope" is it called now?) and Empire - or will it be a mess like Jedi? Only time will tell.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  130. PSX Modchips make VCD's playable?? by 8Complex · · Score: 1

    I think this is a mistype but hey, if you're actually correct on this one maybe I will get that Matrix VCD burnt...

    8Complex

    1. Re:PSX Modchips make VCD's playable?? by kveldulv-- · · Score: 1

      Unless this catalog in front of me is lying, there's an AKAI DVD player for sale, that according to this plays VCD's too, it's $1099 if anyone cares :)

      -not stating anything groundbreaking just noticed it reading the paper

    2. Re:PSX Modchips make VCD's playable?? by razorwire · · Score: 1
      A modchip won't do the job, but there do exist MPEG-1 decoder boxes that hang off the PSX serial port. I've seen a couple of places online that sell 'em. They're kinda pricey though.

      If you have a DVD player it might be able to play VCDs. (I think most can, but some choke on CD-Rs.)
      --

  131. 3hrs? thats nothing by ErikSev · · Score: 1

    I camped out, skipped school w/ unexcused absences, walked in to take a test I couldn't get a 0 on, and then drove back to the theatre to wait some more (my mom held my spot). Some people have camped out for > A MONTH!! But, yeah, RALEIGH RULES B/C 12:01 IS HERE FIRST!!! :)

    Erik

    P.s. The camping out RULED. I would definately recommend it. A TON OF FUN!!!!!!!!!

  132. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by Jello · · Score: 1

    I don't really understand how changing the file format the trailer is in is "bastardizing" it. The only reason it's in Quicktime in the first place is because Lucas has deals with Apple. None of this stuff has anything to do with "art". I mean all Lucas is concerned about is money, that's it, nothing less and nothing more.

  133. d13 by giuoco · · Score: 0

    Star wars rules. Everything else sucks. My life is SW:TPM. Disrespect it and you will die. Die all non believers. Long live Lucas.

    Kent.

    --
    Poopdick.
  134. Re:Bad Review by pspeed · · Score: 1

    It's fun to read all of the old bad reviews of the first three movies too. Only in hindsight will we all know for sure.

    Besides, what better way to get someone to read your article than trashing a movie everyone is talking about. It's not like it's going to keep anyone from going and seeing it.

    --
    Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
    Comparing? THEN use THAN.
  135. Satire? by pspeed · · Score: 2

    It was sooo bad that I just looked at is a sort of poking fun of all of the other hype we are likely to see. I'm probably (definitely?) wrong, but I find the world is much more interesting when viewed as one big self-deprecating joke. :)

    --
    Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
    Comparing? THEN use THAN.
  136. We got all the tickets we wanted by joshv · · Score: 1

    Here in Chicago, me and two friends set out to purchase something like 30 tickets for multiple showings and got all we wanted.

    The web site was a bust, but the Moviefone phone system yielded to persistent speed dialing. Each of us got on at least twice and were able to order up to our max of 6 tickets.

    I am now the proud owner of twelve tickets - shhh don't tell Lucas.

    Those poor saps that waited days in line...

    -josh

  137. sizzler by mr_burns · · Score: 2

    Sizzler has a REALLY bad commercial. There are Luke and Han type-characters eating at sizzler. During the chatter about Sizzler, they are using all kinds of bad star wars puns. "Q:How do you eat it? A:Use the fork" is one of the worst. The acting sucks too

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  138. The odds of caring about H. Stern's review... by jabber · · Score: 1

    ...are about the same as the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field. :)

    After all, the man gets impressed by a skank throating a 3-foot kielbasa, and compares penis sizes on the air.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:The odds of caring about H. Stern's review... by Another+MacHack · · Score: 1

      You've got to admit that's pretty damn impressive.

  139. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by HeghmoH · · Score: 0

    "Linux is free only if your time is worth nothing."

    Please give this FUD a break. Linux is free of licensing charges. *NOTHING* in the world is completely free simply because everything must adhere to the second law of thermodynamics.


    FUD? Do you even know what the letters F U D stand for, or are you just subscribing to the Buzzword of the Week like so many other mindless drones out there?

    FUD, Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. How does that apply to the quoted phrase? Fear of my time really being worth nothing? Uncertainty that Linux is actually free? Doubt that it's free? Come on.

    The fact of the matter is that it's true! Linux takes a lot more time to get used to for people who are inexperienced at it, and the time I spend learning Linux is, for me, better spent doing homework or studying or writing the next great thing for MacOS. (Yes, I am a Mac programmer, so sue me.)

    Saying that just because nothing is free doesn't mean that Linux isn't free is absolute silliness.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  140. what i want from these movie. by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1

    if the new films were nothing other than two hours of text one line at a time rolling up the screen telling us the story, i would pay my 8.50 to go see it. add john williams' soundtrack and of course i'll go. add just one jedi duel and i'm ecstatic. any picture or sound at all, in other words, is gravy on top of something i have been waiting about half my life to see.

    in any case i will be going to episode i at least four or five times, and would be going even if, as i said, it was only the text of the story scrolling up the screen.

    im am sam i am

    --
    burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
  141. I Love You / I Know by Sloppy · · Score: 0

    Hmm.. in the Kershner interview, Kershner takes credit for the the "I Know" response. I recall reading somewhere a few years ago (in a John Belushi biography?) that Ford ad-libbed it because the scene had been shot many times over, due to Fischer's drug problems.

    So... what's the truth? And why am I mentioning this on Slashdot? Oh well...

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:I Love You / I Know by AJWM · · Score: 1

      It's also about the most effective thing Solo could have said at that point - effective in getting Leia to focus her attention on her own problems. Not "I love you too", not "Don't worry about me". Just a smartass response like "I know" to snap her out of a potential melancholy mindset into an action mindset.

      Which makes that line particularly effective.

      --
      -- Alastair
  142. Re:Lucas ~ Gates? wow! by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

    Lucas = Gates
    You = Ignorant Slashdot Reader

    The quote where you got your parody "Wipe them out, all of them" was not from Darth Maul but was from Darth Sidius (Senator/Emperor Palpatine). Get your facts straight next time.

  143. The Best Cinemas to watch SW:TPM ? by MicAttAck · · Score: 1

    I'll visit my aunt in June. She lives near San Francisco. Which will be the best cinema to watch Star Wars in? I mean do all cinemas have THX and biiig screens and all that, or is there a favourite one where you'll go?? Just asking

    --

    -- MicAttAck
    Religon is an insult to human dignity.
  144. Videoclip from Toy Box by Nemosoft+Unv. · · Score: 2

    Well, I just saw the new videoclip from Toy Box: Best Friend and in one scene they start figthing with sabers... How far can and will this Hoopla go? :)

    --
    "Fix it? It has been disintegrated, by definition it cannot be fixed!" - Gru in Despicable Me.
  145. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    You're redefining the usage of the term ``free''. This is a distinct no-no. If you want to get technical about it, nothing in the world is a can either, because nothing in the world will fit all 50+ definitions of the word ``can'' and all 1000+ usages of such definitions.

  146. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    ...or you get value from/pay for using it. Would be a good extension to your quote. For me Linux equivalent to a perpetual motion machine, because I get more from it than I put into it.

  147. Me? I'm thrilled by my Lego Snowspeeder by Pope · · Score: 1

    Get the Snowspeeder man, it's cool!
    I think I was more excited about the Lego sets than the movie.
    I've always wanted this, and now I have it!
    It's too bad the TIE Fighter looks like crap, 3 colours?! Come on!!

    Oh, and I got the Lightsaber Duel set, and made Darth Maul's saber 2 sided!
    Just a little patience and an X-Acto knife...

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  148. Can we say "P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C"? by Anm · · Score: 1

    Can we say "P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C"?

  149. Bah...Lucas spews pablum... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Heh yeah...costed...

    I'll watch it for the special effects, but from what I'm hearing, the plot is going to be Return Of The Jedi II.

    Good call on Austin Powers 2. I saw the trailer when I saw Election (AWESOME movie BTW) and I was crying.

    "Well which one is it baby? Shpitz or Shwallow?"


    -Little Me

    --
    Blar.
  150. Re:My can of Diet Pepsi had Queen Amidala (sp?) on by AJWM · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but ask yourself who's doing the marketing in this case - Lucasfilm or PepsiCo? Hint, I'll bet PepsiCo is paying Lucas for the rights to crank out a set of SW:TPM "collector cans", and not Lucasfilm paying Pepsico to advertise SW:TPM on their cans.

    Last I heard, Lucasfilm had hardly spent any money advertising the film - they don't need to. Ditto with all the product tie-ins. Who do you suppose was beating down whose doors for the rights to manufacture SW toys and action figures? Lucas probably had to beat them off with a stick.

    --
    -- Alastair
  151. Dinosaurs by nyet · · Score: 1

    They all fail to see the writing on the wall.

    Lucas is bright enough to see that digital distribution is the wave of the future... what he doesn't see is that restricting the flow of information to his LIKING has nothing to do with cracking down on "Wild West" (GIGGLE - this Internet cliche is only about 30 years old) lawlessness.

    It is about as pointless as trying to hold water in a sieve. Their whole delicate world is crumbling around them and all they can do is bleat about the lack of morality on the 'net.

    They're on the ropes...

    The argument about the quality of the pirated films being poor enough that people will still see the movies in theatres is a specious one. This trend will not stop at cheap bootlegged ripoffs. Sooner or later technology will make transporting full resolution full frame rate copies trivial.

    It is all bits people. Once we can move enough of them at a time, the result is inevitable.

  152. Can Do's and Can't Do's? by Jessamy · · Score: 3

    C'mon people.. I now that most of you Linux people beleive in no copyright notices but you have to respsect the creative talents and wishes of the creator. If Lucas wants only QuickTime format then keep it in QuickTime format. If he doesn't want you post the movie anyplace then don't. It's HIS production. He wrote it. It's his dream.

    I certainly wouldn't like anyone taking any of my artwork without permission and potentially bastardizing it.

    --
    Linux is free only if your time is worth nothing.
    1. Re:Can Do's and Can't Do's? by zagmar · · Score: 1

      Yet another attempt to compare two very different things. He is using Quicktime for the quality. Quality he believes he can't get out of mpeg or avi. Like others have said, it's his prerogative.

  153. Lucas ~ Gates? wow! by the_tsi · · Score: 2

    You're right!

    In order to see Star Wars, I have to find a theater that has an SMP.. i mean, THX system. It has to have a certain amount of client seats. It probably will get used so much that the projector will crash. And speaking of projectors, to see Star Wars 2000 (to be released in 2001?) I'll have to find someplace that has upgraded beyond what is currently available on the market (read: digital projectors).

    Why, my open source (16mm) movies will play on damn near any projector, but Lucasfilms need to be in a classy establishment. Plus, his movies cost a lot more.

    Darth Maul should be the next Office Assistant. "Spell check your documents. ALL of them." "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"

    -Chris

    1. Re:Lucas ~ Gates? wow! by Kynes23 · · Score: 1

      Ludicrous. Star Wars costs more? Star Wars came
      in $5 million under budget; compare that to
      Titanic. It was also vastly more cost-effetive.
      It has thousands of effects for half of the
      cost that Titanic did a few hundred with.

      So...

  154. Re:Lucas Should Be Worrying About Other Issues. by aphrael · · Score: 1

    Go to the netherlands. Or Poland: in both places they"ll show it subtitled instead of dubbed.

  155. Wakko's Wakko Wish by Gerard+Motola · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows Wakko's Wakko Wish will be better anyway...

    1. Re:Wakko's Wakko Wish by Gerard+Motola · · Score: 1

      Why did that get -1?

  156. Re:I'm curious... by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

    According to the article they aren't happy about it but aren't currently prosecuting anyone for it....

    While I understand why they to be concerned about this, has anyone actually watched the version of the Matrix that's floating around? no music, really poor lighting, very poor quality. It's difficult to believe anyone would watch this in place of the real deal...

  157. Finally Glad I live on the East Coast... by dayeight · · Score: 1

    It will be 12:01 here first!!!

    On a darker note, I waited 3 hours for tickets, and my friend came by one hour after they started selling them and still got a 12:01 showing. Reverse sour grapes I guess. My local cinema will house EP1 on 3 screens.

  158. My can of Diet Pepsi had Queen Amidala (sp?) on it by Kaa · · Score: 1

    It also said "Collector's can #17". Boggle.

    I wonder if more money was spend marketing the film than creating it.

    Kaa

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  159. E - All of the above by Vlad+Drac · · Score: 1

    This Star Wars hoopla is Just Media Hype which is, in part, Deserved and To Be Expected in today's society. *BUT* it's also Pissing Me Off, cuz I want to know as little as possible about the damned film so that I can be as surprised as I was during the first 3. Between friends, enemies, newspapers, web-sites and other such information repositories, I can't escape!! *aiiieeeeeeeee* ;-)

  160. I've seen it! by Mr+T · · Score: 2
    And it was amazing. The special effects are unlike anything I've seen before, they totally blend in. The story isn't half bad either, kind of a bittersweet ending but I thought it was completely enjoyable.

    Of course it could have been 45 minutes of black screen and I probably would have enjoyed it if they called it starwars..

    I think the hype is deserved, initially I didn't think the movie would live up to the hype but I think it does for the most part. There are a few things I'm not so sure about, how they are going to make the connection from III to IV, for example and they kind of lose some of that cool 1970's style "sci-fi look" that the original new hope had. They also intentionally leave you hanging and wanting more but it was a good movie overall.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  161. The truth is... by for(;;); · · Score: 1

    Kershner takes credit for allowing the actors to ad-lib lines, not for the lines themselves. From the article:

    Salon> But at Kershner's prodding, Ford came up
    Salon> with just the right piece of macho
    Salon> wit: instead of "I love you, too," a
    Salon> sardonic "I know."

    --

    "Whatever happened to fair use?"
    -- Duff-Man
  162. Re:Lucas v. Gates by for(;;); · · Score: 1

    RL> I find this truly depressing because I don't
    RL> want pre-digested movies and entertainment.

    Can you name an "undigested" movie? True, a lot of blockbusters are more sugary and condescending than other movies, but any movie is still a mediated experience. Rather than go live life like W.R. Hearst, we watch Citizen Kane. Rather than actually experiencing nature, we get a synthesized version of it from a PBS documentary or biology textbook.

    --

    "Whatever happened to fair use?"
    -- Duff-Man
  163. Lucas v. Gates by for(;;); · · Score: 3

    Actually, this is not unlike the Neal Stephenson "Cryptonomicon" essay posted to /. a while back. The essence of the essay was that folks these days prefer mediated experiences to "real" ones. People want easy-to-digest movies, people want idiot-proof GUIs.

    However, "Star Wars", as entertainment, works.

    Windows, as an operating system, does not work.

    If watching Star Wars sucked as much ass as using Windows -- and if they make a "Jar-Jar Binks Meet the Ewoks" saturday morning cartoon, it just might -- I would have to agree with you. Certainly Gates and Lucas are both fanatical about guarding intellectual property, and both have sunk their claws into other industries. Lucas, however, makes good stuff.

    --

    "Whatever happened to fair use?"
    -- Duff-Man
    1. Re:Lucas v. Gates by Robert+Link · · Score: 1

      The essence of the essay was that folks these days prefer mediated experiences to "real" ones. People want easy-to-digest movies, ...

      I find this truly depressing because I don't want pre-digested movies and entertainment. Unfortunately, as the predilection for watered-down entertainment becomes more prevalent those of us who want entertainment with substance start to become a niche market. I think Lucas has shown himself quite capable of truly first-class storytelling, and I hope the market for that sort of story has not yet become so marginal that he won't attempt it here.


      -r

  164. Re:Are you really playing with toys!?!? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Are you dense? I never had any money for toys when I was a kid, and now I do. If you don't understand why playing with Lego and action figures and neat models is fun, then I feel very very sorry for you. You might think that makes you more mature, but I just think it's kinda sad.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  165. Re:Lucas Should Be Worrying About Other Issues. by beleriand · · Score: 1

    Here in central europe it's differnt.. it's more like... "I'll skip the mpeg... I am waiting to see it in the theatre".. (*not*)

    That, and then in most places they only show the german version ... grrrrrrrr

  166. Re:Bad Review by Rombuu · · Score: 1

    Besides "Private Parts" what movie has Howard Stern liked?

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  167. the magic is still there by confidential · · Score: 2

    I just got back from the movie and i have to say it absolutely rocked. The effects were good, the twists were, well... unexpected, and overall i'd give it an A

    but, alot of critics say the movie stinks, it has no dialogue, no more magic. A movie can only do so much. It is but pictures and voice put together. It is what you perceave it as. What i find the magic of starwars is the communal bonding of everyone who sees it. I started lining up for my 12:30 show at 12:00 and had a blast with the other people in line. How many strangers can you walk up to and say food is god in 4 different languages before they give up without you getting hit? When we got in, we hassled the poor kid with focus until it was absolutely perfect, and when the lucasfilms logo appeared some guy in the back screamed out "starwars rules!" followed by another enthuiastic round of cheering. There was the standard laugh and cheering and booing with the movie as there was 16 years ago. For the people that say that it doesn't touch them anymore, you've grown up. i'm sorry but there's nothing a movie can do about that. JarJar is one awesome charactor (i love his walk^_^) and whereas he can get annoying, he's there to bring in the kids, what do you think C3P0 and R2D2 were for besides comic relief? sure, you may say i'm brainwashed like all the rest, but if you let it overcome you, its quite fun. The magic is still there because the community will always be here and always have each other to look for wierdness. The magic hasn't disapeared in the films, the magic has disapeared in you...


    "reality is but an constant illusion" - Einstien
    #include "i_know_my_spelling_sucks_so_nyah!.h"

  168. Re:Star Wars Filter by Pepe+Rodriguez · · Score: 1

    Do you realize that in the process of creating said filter, you will have to view tons of the "offending" information in order to make sure it works? Not only that but you would have to read lots of it to discern what distinguishes the material from everything else. Your filter will be counter productive, at least for you.

    --
    /*---------------------------*/
    Man? What is man?
    But a collection of chemicals with delusions of granduer.
  169. Huh? by jalfano · · Score: 2

    What's Star Wars?

  170. Re:If you think 5 or 6 dolars is bad... by techwolf · · Score: 1

    For those who care (and a small handful of those who don't), 10-15 pounds in US$ is about $16-$24.

    Once you have your (golden) ticket, don't forget to get to the theater 4 hours before your show starts. I figure thats when the line will start for the show to get good seats.

    As for me, I think I'll be seeing Star Wars exactly one month after the release. Woohoo!

    --
    I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
  171. 16 years by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    The best comment on this was made a few days back, that TPM has to live up to 16 years of expectation.

    As I recall back in 1977, there were Star Wars lunchboxes, squirtguns, band-aids, Tshirts, and toys. Taco Bell had Darth Vader cups -- free refills with purchase for the duration of the offer. I remember seeing Carrie Fisher on SNL with the original cast. -- Hype, hype, hype.

    I remember reading about Haile Sellassie appearing before the League of Nations in 1936 [?] asking for help against Mussolini and warning the other nations about his Teutonic friend. "I was not crowned emporer of my people to watch them die while you discuss this in a committee."

    There *is* nothing new under the sun. Those who can't remember the past are doomed to whine incessantly.

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  172. If you think 5 or 6 dolars is bad... by Doze · · Score: 1

    Over here in the UK the lame plastic figures go for 10 to 15 pounds!

    I agree with the sentiments about saying "I saw it first!" I read that you can't buy plane tickets fromthe UK to the US on the day of release - they're all sold out!

    The hype is just sickening, and so many otherwise sensible and rational people have fallen for it.

    1. Re:If you think 5 or 6 dolars is bad... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Theatres here (up north) have just hiked their prices to CDN$10/person, and estimates have it now that to take the average family out to the movies will cost a princely CDN$75...

      Not including costs like lining up 4 hours ahead of time, etc. etc.

      I'll wait for the DVD... (Lucas would be unintelligent [extremely] to wait for all the movies to come out before releasing the DVDs/videos). Simple reason: if you can't get the DVD and the movie's not being shown... great time to start bootlegging, unfortunately.

  173. Wild West? by PenguinDude · · Score: 0

    "He doesn't want the Internet to become the Wild West and ripe with lawlessness."

    But then it wouldn't be any fun..!

  174. The importance of authentic excitement by magpye · · Score: 2

    I agree. We do have to create our own myths; I think it's very important that we learn to do this instead of accepting the ones other people try to feed us. I voted Deserved because I think the Star Wars hype is different from most movie hype in the sense that it's a myth that we really *did* create. I don't like movie advertisers telling me what I should be excited about, and it does make me a little sick to go to the store and see Phantom Menace characters plastered over every product. That kind of hype does piss me off, just as did the hype for Godzilla, Stargate, Independence Day, et cetera, ad nausem. Star Wars is different, though, because, unlike those movies, there's real, grassroots excitement for the movie as well as the corporate-produced hubbub. Years after the original Star Wars trilogy was released, and years before anyone thought that a second trilogy was a possibility for the near future, lots of people still loved Star Wars, not because a marketing campaign suggested that we should, but because we wanted to. The excitement that flowed through the people standing with me in the hour-long line for tickets last Wednesday was something that we had created in ourselves and in each other, something we could really enjoy as our own, regardless or even in spite of the corporate-imposed hype for the movie.

    Like you say, there are so few things that can draw our society together today with any sincerity of emotion. Star Wars itself isn't, and shouldn't be seen as anything more than something fun and lighthearted, but that's a really important role for it to fill. I think it's wonderful that people around the country and around the world can get together for a couple of hours and enjoy themselves, sincerely and communally. With all the problems nationalist and religious fanaticism create today, it's good to know we still have the capability to get excited about something that is harmless.

    --
    An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. -- G.K. Chesterton
  175. law enforcement into the '90s by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

    "...and the law enforcement officials are definitely into the '90s on this and are very interested in making sure this kind of contact doesn't occur."

    Anyone else think this is a stupid statement? Too bad the "'90s" are all but over.

    "you are _so_ early 90's" -- Larry the Cucumber

  176. Save some for the movie by Daddy+Gravity · · Score: 1

    Yikes, gotta be careful which key I hit...

    OK--hype. Yeah, it would be nice to have *some* suprises left when I actually see the movie (my whole department is going as a company outing).

    The real excitement for me out of all this is that by the time my daughter is in high school (she's two now), she'll be able to make movies on our home computer that will blow away anything Lucas has ever dreamed of. I wish I'd had non-linear digital editing and 3-D environmental rendering when I was in high school--it would have kept me out of much trouble.

    --
    "I am here by the will of the people and I won't leave until I get my umbrella back."
  177. Re:Does the hype really matter at all? by Cb22 · · Score: 1

    I'd camp out on line to see the lint documentary.

  178. Hype is Hype, all movies do it. by Jeckle · · Score: 2

    Yes, Star Wars has a cult following to rival most any other movie. George Lucas did not HAVE to hype the movie. He would have packed the theaters with the rabid fans for weeks and made millions anyway. But, that is not the point. You can never have enough fans. That is a cardinal rule of Hollywood and neither Lucas nor Spielberg are above it. The goal of all this is the same as when ID4, MIB, and the future WWW came or will come out. (WWW= Wild Wild West - funny how all the big-hype movies have acronymed titles)- to get kids interested in it. To get more and more fans. Guess what folks, how many people on this site stood in line and got tix? How many people plan on skipping work to see it? How many people plan on seeing it more than once in the theaters? How many people scoffed at Lliam Nieson's comment, "It's just a movie."? How many people would download a pirated copy at the first inklng of a chance? The hype worked.

    Another thing, all this talk about pirated copies of the movie... wasn't this already discussed? I got the general impression that folks who replied to that thgouht the same thing, people will pirate stuff. There is nothing any law enforcement agency can do to stamp it out for the simple reason that the majority of people don't care if it gets stamped out or not. Why is there so much discussion about it again on this poll? Get over it folks, the money-makers will always bitch about people pirating their stuff, and the money-givers will always look for cheaper ways of getting the stuff.

    Last thing. Someone said people either love or hate Star Wars. Is anyone else out there as tired as I am of this lame explaination of absolutely nothing? It's like saying, "people either breathe and live or don't and die." No s**t sherlock. True fans will not blindly love anything Lucas puts out. A true fan is Lucas' biggest fear. This is the person who will be, in fact, should be the most critical person of TPM. This is a person who has waited longer, and wanted this movie more than the average person. If it sucks, the true fan should feel the most let down of anyone.

    to steal a saying, "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong."

    --
    /Sig/
  179. Because May 20th has to come.... by Mikesch · · Score: 1

    >What's wrong with getting a little, or a lot, excited about something pointless and childish?

    Because, once the 20th rolls around and everyone has seen the movie, the backlash starts...people will be complaining about how bad the movie sucked, when the truth is that their expectations were too high. Lets face it, there are a lot of people who could not be satisfied by this movie even if Darth Maul were to jump out of the screen and cut a movie goer's head off with a light saber. No matter what, people are going to be let down by it....and those of us who are going to *see a movie*, not regain our lost childhood will have to put up the endless whining of the people criticising every small flaw in it. Will I be going to see it? Yes, but with the expectation of a good movie, not with the expectation of seeing the second coming. And for all the people getting the toys....they aren't going to be collectors items. See, there are millions who have bought these things to keep them in their original plastic, in a hermetically sealed container in their basement...the market is flooded and will be for a long time...I went out and bought Darth Maul, and you know what? I opened it and played with it...its on my computer right now...a lot more fun then leaving it in its plasic and staring at it for 20 years.

  180. Re:Pissing me off??? by squeak42 · · Score: 1

    ah, rational thought. thanks. it's refreshing to see someone put things neatly in perspective.

  181. Is the hype just hype? easy to get tickets! by outgrabed · · Score: 1

    So I've been hearing about the lines for a month straight- even seen the webcams of the lines.
    But when I went to the mall today to pick up some cajun for lunch, I also bought 2 tickets for the 12:01 show with absolutely NO wait! Not even a single person in front of me.
    I'm in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, so maybe the people are all chokin back a cold one that night instead or have had their heads stuck under a cow for a month, but I wouldnt have thought that even a bunch of cheeseheads could be so oblivious to something so seemingly HUGE!
    Is the hype so big that people don't even want to think about standing in line? Are the negetive reviews souring everyone?
    Personally the hype made me want to see it less and the reviews made me want to see it more:)

    Oh well- at least I'm seeing it:)

  182. Got my ticket. 12:30 Wednesday Morning. by Restil · · Score: 1

    12:01 show was sold out already, but all things considered, that didn't really surprise me, considering I didn't get my ticket until today. Me and lines just don't mix, and standing in line for a long time is just silly. I got there, NO lines, 2 cashiers at 2 different windows. One window had a sign: "This cashier cannot sell Star Wars tickets". The other window: "This cashier can ONLY sell Star Wars tickets", and leading up to that window was a very long cordoned off line (nobody in it of course).

    The 12:01 showing was sold out, as were all of the prime time slots, but there were still several times available on Wednesday and all of Thursday (I got there right when they started selling those).

    As for the surprise "I am your father" line, I like the way that it was kept secret until the first audience saw it in the theaters. Although, even though the director and Mark Hamill needed to know about it due to their lines, why wasn't James Earl Jones mentioned in that list as well? After all, HE SPOKE IT! :)

    I simply couldn't wait, so I read the book already for TPM, but I'm certain that I won't be any less entertained by the movie. There aren't any shocking revealations in the story although there are a couple IF you knew nothing about the movie before hand, but simply knowing a list of the character names is enough to spoil those. I also realize that there will be elements of the movie that won't be in the book and parts of the book that won't be in the movie. That's just the way things work, and its also quite likely that the storyline the book was written from is several months old and theres a good chance that several plot elements of the movie could have been changed between then and now.

    Doesn't matter. I'll be just as excited either way.

    hell, I'm excited already. :)

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  183. How about simply: `This Star Wars Hoopla is *fun*' by victorw · · Score: 5

    What's wrong with getting a little, or a lot, excited about something pointless and childish?
    the bombs are falling, everyone is making enough that they can take a week out to stand in line, or hours to wardial a ticket line. we all just want to have fun. there is not much left in the world that people care about, no charismatic leaders to follow, no religions to throw mad festivals, we have to create our own myths. and heck this one is better than most, like the marshmallow man, let's concentrate on something simple and innocent, and hope the crap goes away.

    pease

  184. I saw it- SPOILERS BELOW by Adar · · Score: 2

    Everything the detractors and critics have been saying about SW is true. Jar Jar Binks has his moments, but mostly, he's just annoying. Jake Lloyd acts as well as any 10-year old can- he gets a little better towards the end of the film, but mostly, he's a proud graduate of the Keanu Reeves School of Acting. Senator Palpatine looks like a warped Bill Murray, and the special effects sometimes overwhelm the story.

    I loved every minute of it.

    There were parts that were good; the pod race may not have had much to do with the story, but it WAS cool. There were parts that were great; the Naboo/droid battle was spectacular, the battle scenes inside the palace were a lot like the stormtrooper/Alliance battle inside the corvette at the beginning of A New Hope, and the T-Wing vs. the giant ship thing was a lot better than you would think in the trailers. Darth Maul was also much better than the trailers would make you believe; when he stared through the force field, you could FEEL the aura.

    And then there was The Duel.

    The .mp3 was OK, but not that great. The battle by itself was magnificently choreographed, but wouldn't go well with the old Empire theme. With that music as a backdrop, it was 10 minutes of the best lightsaber fight anyone could possibly have hoped for.

    If and when the movie's out on the 'Net, what I want most of all is that someone strips the rest of the movie and just releases the duel as a standalone.

    I think I'll go see it again on Friday...



    1. Re:I saw it- SPOILERS BELOW by PinkFreud · · Score: 1

      You really like contradicting yourself, don't you?

  185. No .. by cje · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is to software as Jerry Springer is to television. Think about it; both of them make their living by peddling trash to an unsuspecting public that, for whatever reason, can't get enough of it.

    The Phantom Menace is being grossly overhyped, yes. But the original Star Wars trilogy is an American icon for reasons other than hype, marketing, and licensed merchandise. Comparing Lucas to Gates seems to be almost blasphemous.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:No .. by Bughammer · · Score: 1

      The difference is, Jerry doesn't have illusions about what he's doing. He knows his show is a joke, so he has fun with it. Bill on the other hand...

  186. It's Geek code. by Rocket+Boy · · Score: 1

    You can translate it into meaningful stuff, but I don't have the link off hand. Try infoseek with "Geek Code" as the search subject.

    RB

  187. Moviefone is still hosed by Rocket+Boy · · Score: 3

    Locally, the moviefone number was hosed all day, the entire automated system crashed. It still just shunts all calls to a full mailbox.
    Funny. I didn't know a phone system could be slashdotted.

    RB

  188. Waiting in Lines? by the+ignorant+masses · · Score: 1

    One of my friends spent 5 minutes either on the phone, or online (dunno which, only know he didn't stand in any line), and got bout 12 tickets for the whole group. 1220am tonight/tomorow morning.

    Do I laugh, sneer, or berate those who spend hours in line? No. Why should I. How does their actions affect me in any way such that I should insult them?

    That is what gets me pissed off. The complete disrespect people have for others that don't hold the same vaules or ideas as them.

    -Sarkis-

    --
    "Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
  189. Waiting in Line by rakshasa · · Score: 1

    I don't think that all the people who wait in line for Star Wars are doing it because they really want to see the movie that bad. I am kinda into star wars, but I'm not going to die if I dont see it on the first day, or the first month.

    But still, I cut school on wednesday, drove to vacaville (20 or 30 miles away) with some friends, and stood in line for four hours to get tickets. I did it kinda partly so I could one day say "I stood in line for four hours to buy tickets to star wars." I mean, how often do you get to participate in something like that, as boring as it may sound, it was actually really fun, lots of star wars fans, people doing things, in fact, I even saw some other friends who were waiting in line too. It was like a party, the only thing it was missing was beer. And when I got my tickets, it wasnt for the 12:01 showing, but it was for the first day, and I felt pretty cool.

    Sometimes part of the reason for things isnt so much the result, as the experience of doing what it takes to get there. Maybe I have an interesting idea of fun, but it works for me.

    Rakshasa

  190. Star Wars Project Vs. Merch. by Slycee · · Score: 3

    I think Rob's message about the cost of SDI vs. the merchandising of Star Wars is a bit misleading (at least the way I read it). Here is what Harper's actually states:
    "Amount the Pentagon will spend this year on its Ballistic Missile Defense or "star wars" program : $4,166,000,000

    Amount the world has spent since 1977 on licensed Star Wars merchandise : $4,500,000,000"

  191. I liked it, I watched it. by Larry1369 · · Score: 1

    The old Star Wars.
    Even went to see the "special footage" version.
    Bottom line is, Star Wars was ahead of it's time in special effects. Who doesn't like a light saber? Or princess lei her?
    I think I'm gonna watch spaceballs again before I see Phantom Menace.
    The original Star Wars was corny.

    --
    Cheers
  192. Star Wars Filter by iwoj · · Score: 1
    Unlike yourself, I have immersed myself in all the hoopla. I've sought out every tidbit of information -- short of reading the book. Now I am starting to wish I hadn't. I plan on taking your approach to Star Wars abstinence when the Episode II and III hype starts.

    I was thinking that it would be a great help to the weak-minded (such as myself) by creating a Star Wars Filter that would block out any potentially spoiler content from websites and email.

    Anyone interested in working on this project, please contact me, or visit the project's site ( http://woj.com/filter). Especially welcome are those with experience in AI and Linguistics.

    Cheers.

    ian

    1. Re:Star Wars Filter by iwoj · · Score: 1

      Luckily there's very little information available about Episode II, so I'm not too worried about finding spoilers during testing. Furthermore, I don't expect the filter to be very complex -- just a proxy server that warns users if they request a page with the words "star wars" in it.

  193. Pissing me off??? by quazix · · Score: 0

    I don't know about anyone else, but I have a great plethera of other things to be pissed off at than the amount of media hype. If you don't like the advertisement go get a beer, if you don't like the special collector's cup don't order the 62 oz drink, if you don't like standing in line at the theater rent a video. My anger is so inflamed by general stupidity, distruction of rain forest, and censureship that the media attention a film gets doesn't rate a 1 on my pissed-off-o'meter.

  194. Re:Lucas is the evil empire... by Gurney5 · · Score: 1

    And why should he pay back the fans who willingly gave him money? Of their own free wills?

  195. MovieFone by BitPoet · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see what kind of hardware/os MovieFone was using for its pages and phone service. Also to get some traffic stats as well. We hear all kinds of talk about the kinds of traffic that all FOO-brand servers can handle, let's see some real-world data.

    I'd also like to see what killed the Victoria's Secret servers a couple of months ago.

  196. Re:I'm curious... by First+Post · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it was just that I remember another article saying that he wouldn't prosecute kiddies who were posting trailers on non-profit websites, but this article seems to say he'll go after anyone. I wish there were more specific statements on "can-do" and "cannot-do"...

  197. I'm curious... by First+Post · · Score: 2

    Does his stance against piracy include those of us who turn the Quicktime trailers into MPEGs and distribute them for free?

  198. Yes, that's it! by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Yes! That's it exactly. I voted "deserved" because that was the only option I had, but "fun" hits the nail on the head.
    --

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  199. Same as the first three by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    These are the same reviews the first three movies got.

    IMHO, reviews carry no information whatsoever. That is, they're as likely to be right as wrong.
    --

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  200. Hype lessens a movie's rating by Shalafi · · Score: 1

    If a movie is called the 'movie of the century' and it turns out to be the movie of the year, people are disapointed. If a movie is made out to be the 'worst movie ever' and it turns out to be the same movie of the year, people are happy. I think in the end, most people will lose.
    Plus-- Lucas was quoted as saying he didn't expect episode 1 to be as big as Titanic. Maybe that's not saying a lot because Titanic was big. Okay, camped out at the theater. I have my tickets. I would do the same if it was made out to be the worst movie ever. Stupid? A little. In fact, I would expect worse movies to get more hype to equalize things... does anybody remember Godzilla?

  201. Re: original cast members by Shalafi · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose among the list would be--
    Palpatine - Ian McDiarmid
    Yoda - Frank Oz
    C-3PO - Anthony Daniels
    R2-D2 - Kenny Baker
    Not the most interesting characters to come back, but they're there, next time search for yourself.

  202. I'm thrilled by my Lego Landspeeder by georgeha · · Score: 1

    It's so cool looking sitting on top of my monitor. I don't know if I'll buy the X-wing or Tie Fighter, as they're a little too pricy for my Lego jones, but the Landspeeder was the right price.

    Now I just need a few pounds of brown to make a sand crawler.

    George

  203. Re:It's only a movie & a drinking game by zIRtrON · · Score: 1

    i've watched the first 3 about 26times each..
    mainly for fun, sometimes for boredom, then it becomes fun, then for drinking to with friends, so that becomes fun....so basically i watch it for fun...mind you.... i haven't watched a starwars movie for about 4months now...hmmmm?

  204. Lucas = Gates NOT! by zIRtrON · · Score: 1

    cos Lucas went back and edited the original scores when the technology became available cos it was unfinished when it was released...which wasn't his fault..he was ahead of his time......
    AS FOR GATES......what a joke :P

  205. Is there any original cast members in the new one? by zIRtrON · · Score: 1

    just a question......i don't watch tv....
    only seen two trailers once each...
    so there...legit question....

  206. Star Wars and fx-bullshit we've seen by zIRtrON · · Score: 2

    hey,
    star wars is f* excellent. Back in those days the fx were awesome....the story however...to this day is one of the greatest....i'm going to watch it for the story.....not the bullshit fx that people have been talking about....if i wanted to see fx i would have seen ID4 Starship troopers and all the other clones around.....this will be the greatest event....the sequel (in reverse order) .. of probably the greatest set of movies ever made....
    Lucas is a legend...however he should shut up about copyright.....that dude that wrote in about people going to watch it in the theatre is right.
    People aren't going to watch a f* great movie in mpeg format when the awesomeness is fully experienced in a theatre...Lucas should realise this cos he isn't the stupidest f* in the world.
    cya

  207. Does the hype really matter at all? by Speef · · Score: 1

    With hype or without hype everyone would get tired of hearing about it. Titanic had no hype. It's popularity was word of mouth and I'm sure not one person wasn't SICK of hearing about it after a few months. To say that it is the fault of the media for your StarWars OD is wrong. Lucas could make a documentary on lint and name it starwars with no hype, and you would still hear of it nonstop. The media is not to blame for the hype, lunatic obsessive humans are.

    1. Re:Does the hype really matter at all? by Speef · · Score: 1

      So would I [: I never said -I- wasn't stupid.

  208. Lucas Should Be Worrying About Other Issues. by Pika · · Score: 1

    Star Wars is not a movie you can watch for the first time from a crappy, small mpeg that some encoded from sneaking a hand held video camera into the theatre. Granted, that mpeg may make its way onto my hard drive eventually, but not after I have paid to see it several times in the theatre.
    Its a special effects movie; everyone with half a brain cell knows it has to be seen in a theatre to experience to the whole thing. I have yet to hear from anyone, including my friends that have pirated more than bluebeard himself, 'oh geez, I'll skip the theatre .. I am just going to wait for the mpeg'.
    The point is, although the mpeg will proliferate like no other, people are *still* going to pay the money to see it in the theatre. So my advice to Mr. Lucas is not to become so enthrawled at finding and torturing these horrible, horrible pirates, but devote the energy at designing and producing better films. The early reviews of PM should hint to him that this is necessary ;).

  209. Lucas is the evil empire... by iserlohn · · Score: 1

    If he made enough money from royalties this time around, maybe he'll rethink that sequel thingy. Then again, like he hasn't made enough already from the originals.

    Maybe he should think about paying back to the fans that have supported his films.

  210. How about simply: let's let this planet go to hell by Bughammer · · Score: 1

    I think you've answered your own question. Bombs are falling, politicians have no morals, kids are killing each other in schools, and people care more about a movie than any of these things. That's what's wrong.

    People have completely lost perspective on what's really important. Instead of wasting a week for tickets just to be first to see the stupid movie, that time could have been spent helping people that don't even have enough money for food.

    There's nothing wrong with seeing the movie. I'm going to go for sure. But why let it rule our lives?

    It's just a movie. Nothing more.

  211. The movie... by PinkFreud · · Score: 1

    ...absolutely rocked! Just came back from seeing the 12:01 am showing (Eastern) - it was excellent.



    It was everything I expected, which was a good, fantasy story. Nothing more, nothing less.



    My only gripe was how it seemed to parallel the original released trilogy (episodes 4, 5, and 6) a bit too much - you'll see what I mean when you see the movie. Other than that, it was well worth it, and I, for one, will be seeing it again in the theaters.



    PinkFreud

  212. The movie... by PinkFreud · · Score: 2

    ...absolutely rocked! Just came back from seeing the 12:01 am showing (Eastern) - it was excellent.

    It was everything I expected, which was a good, fantasy story. Nothing more, nothing less.

    My only gripe was how it seemed to parallel the original released trilogy (episodes 4, 5, and 6) a bit too much - you'll see what I mean when you see the movie. Other than that, it was well worth it, and I, for one, will be seeing it again in the theaters.

    PinkFreud

  213. Bad Review by Schmecky · · Score: 1

    I had herd Variety magazine and Howard Stern both gave it a bad review.

    1. Re:Bad Review by Schmecky · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as bad publicity.