.8% of the English female population seems to use it (.8% of 25,000,000 is 20,000, summary says 20,000).
That seems about perfect match statistically, and if it's 7% actual see failure rate it's pretty damned effective (behind implant, hormones, surgery, but we'll ahead of anything else).
The article still makes me wonder how many enterprise mobile devices are actually vulnerable, almost certainly very few of the too old to be patched set.
I haven't used a router that couldn't route in ages, and I meant off the shelf consumer stuff for $100ish. They all had the ability to do some poor level of routing.
As for the cheap enterprise thing, I'd assume that's more marketing related, as companies are using it to describe products that can do more routing beyond the off the shelf buffalo (example, ubiquiti has plenty of cheap, four port, routers that they call enterprise, you can argue that they're not, but it was pretty obvious to me what the poster meant, what would you call them?).
If I was doing my typical, it'd be a lot less too. 5-10 for the car, and half the gas, and probably a better comparison to Lyft/Uber (about the same car I'd typically be riding in, and I wouldn't have a truck.
Taxi service was worthless where I live (Wilmington, DE).
45+ minute waits (after telling you 30), sometimes no show. I saw someone wait in the shopping center where I work for 2 hours being told 30 minutes and then constantly 15 minutes away.
Uber/Lyft have the greatest benefit in medium cities, the type where things aren't too far apart, but there isn't enough people to support cabs.in these areas they are not particularly cheaper than a cab, but do show up, and are happy (at least in the face) to do short runs and runs to the suburbs.
I did the math for my commute when I read this article, it's close to break even doing $15/day (10+tip) and having $100 extra for weekends.
If I through in rental for trips it's not, but it's easy to see a world where it is.
My lose math was $15k car, $5k maintenance, $300/month gas, $180/month insurance.
Of course I drive a truck (I used it as such heavily for a couple years, next car won't be), and I'll likely get over 5 years, but it's definitely a thing I can imagine a limited set of lifestyles supporting. Especially if you don't have the money to buy the car upfront.
Most of my friends that use it to commute only do so to work once or twice a week, using the bus when they have the extra 15 - 30 minutes or so.
In that scenario I can see it really working out, bus from home, but ability to sleep somewhere else (which is always a problem when bus reliant in a medium sized city).
Anyway, I obviously used an medium to expensive car calculation (high gas, full insurance, not the cheapest car) vs an optimum Lyft situation (12 minute commute, minimal extra driving, no groceries (had prime fresh until recently), but I also have a 5 day work week.
I can see people in areas such as the Philly edge of city really benefiting shifting behavior because if Lyft/Uber, the cross town public transit is weak, but often accessible efficiently by car, and insurance and parking can be issues.
It should be noted that current Uber/Lyft prices aren't sustainable either, so I doubt it's a trend that will hold long even in the corner cases.
Fertility awareness is generally more than the rythm method.
Rythm method is keeping track of periods.
Fertility awareness is doing that, plus measuring temperature every morning, and keeping track of vaginal mucus.
For some people it is very effective, especially if one uses a wide window for "fertile". Most of the failures are people pushing that window (which is why I assume the app claims perfect use is 99%, maybe they only allow for 2 weeks of safe boning or some such).
Fertility awareness is in the ballpark of effectiveness as withdraw or condone use.
If you're really worried about pregnancy, surgical or hormonal are really the only effective ways.
Everything else is in the same class as "fairly effective, but if you really don't wanna get pregnant, probably not worth the risk"or, one could use withdraw and awareness.
My understanding is that it still needs support of the president and the house, simply that it cannot be fillibustered because it is a review and not a law.
I don't know about paradigm changing, but apple had some nice cutting edge stuff when no one else did.
The iPhone was great (ive never owned one, but apple seemed to do better with low resources than Android).getting people to buy smart phones was a major paradigm shift.
Retina displays are great too, I still use a MacBook with boot camp because for ages there was no other option for a small screen with high resolution.
It'd be nice if it could fall back to a last known good config like on Windows (not that that ever works, but the way Ubuntu seems to keep old ones seems like it could be made to work).
The premise is that minimum wage increase will increase employee pay.
Specifically in the case of remaining minimum wage workers getting laid off due to a minimum wage increase the remaining ones will get more money.
If minimum wage stayed the same, in a couple years the self serve registers would become cheap enough anyway, and the remaining employees would not see a raise as their productivity increased.
But, when a minimum wage hike brings the change a couple years earlier, the remaining employees do see the wage hike.
Slashdot Mirror
.8% of the English female population seems to use it (.8% of 25,000,000 is 20,000, summary says 20,000).
That seems about perfect match statistically, and if it's 7% actual see failure rate it's pretty damned effective (behind implant, hormones, surgery, but we'll ahead of anything else).
Yeah, I misread, or posted on the wrong comment.
The article still makes me wonder how many enterprise mobile devices are actually vulnerable, almost certainly very few of the too old to be patched set.
Well I guess you're right.
In my defense I moved to the $150 "enterprise" stuff a while ago.
My cheapish Bufalo definitely could.
I haven't used a router that couldn't route in ages, and I meant off the shelf consumer stuff for $100ish. They all had the ability to do some poor level of routing.
As for the cheap enterprise thing, I'd assume that's more marketing related, as companies are using it to describe products that can do more routing beyond the off the shelf buffalo (example, ubiquiti has plenty of cheap, four port, routers that they call enterprise, you can argue that they're not, but it was pretty obvious to me what the poster meant, what would you call them?).
Yeah, but the beta news article does nothing to lead me to believe that there's any check if vulnerability for the 100,000 devices analyzed.
I'm curious what percentage of the too old ones are actually vulnerable?
What percentage of the rest?
They didn't link to a source, and they never said the analysis was of vulnerable devices.
For sure.
If I was doing my typical, it'd be a lot less too. 5-10 for the car, and half the gas, and probably a better comparison to Lyft/Uber (about the same car I'd typically be riding in, and I wouldn't have a truck.
Taxi service was worthless where I live (Wilmington, DE).
45+ minute waits (after telling you 30), sometimes no show. I saw someone wait in the shopping center where I work for 2 hours being told 30 minutes and then constantly 15 minutes away.
Uber/Lyft have the greatest benefit in medium cities, the type where things aren't too far apart, but there isn't enough people to support cabs.in these areas they are not particularly cheaper than a cab, but do show up, and are happy (at least in the face) to do short runs and runs to the suburbs.
I did the math for my commute when I read this article, it's close to break even doing $15/day (10+tip) and having $100 extra for weekends.
If I through in rental for trips it's not, but it's easy to see a world where it is.
My lose math was $15k car, $5k maintenance, $300/month gas, $180/month insurance.
Of course I drive a truck (I used it as such heavily for a couple years, next car won't be), and I'll likely get over 5 years, but it's definitely a thing I can imagine a limited set of lifestyles supporting. Especially if you don't have the money to buy the car upfront.
Most of my friends that use it to commute only do so to work once or twice a week, using the bus when they have the extra 15 - 30 minutes or so.
In that scenario I can see it really working out, bus from home, but ability to sleep somewhere else (which is always a problem when bus reliant in a medium sized city).
Anyway, I obviously used an medium to expensive car calculation (high gas, full insurance, not the cheapest car) vs an optimum Lyft situation (12 minute commute, minimal extra driving, no groceries (had prime fresh until recently), but I also have a 5 day work week.
I can see people in areas such as the Philly edge of city really benefiting shifting behavior because if Lyft/Uber, the cross town public transit is weak, but often accessible efficiently by car, and insurance and parking can be issues.
It should be noted that current Uber/Lyft prices aren't sustainable either, so I doubt it's a trend that will hold long even in the corner cases.
Accessibility pretty much must get around security.
It needs to be able to read everything on the screen to function.
Fertility awareness is generally more than the rythm method.
Rythm method is keeping track of periods.
Fertility awareness is doing that, plus measuring temperature every morning, and keeping track of vaginal mucus.
For some people it is very effective, especially if one uses a wide window for "fertile". Most of the failures are people pushing that window (which is why I assume the app claims perfect use is 99%, maybe they only allow for 2 weeks of safe boning or some such).
Fertility awareness is in the ballpark of effectiveness as withdraw or condone use.
If you're really worried about pregnancy, surgical or hormonal are really the only effective ways.
Everything else is in the same class as "fairly effective, but if you really don't wanna get pregnant, probably not worth the risk"or, one could use withdraw and awareness.
You'd expect that every year.
Not every quarter.
Also, this is only one hospital.
Because they need to drum up enough support to get a bill voted on.
The public response to how this vote goes will be very relevant to that.
My understanding is that it still needs support of the president and the house, simply that it cannot be fillibustered because it is a review and not a law.
Are you saying this generation of iPhones is a bigger update than the retina screen or larger model?!
I don't know about paradigm changing, but apple had some nice cutting edge stuff when no one else did.
The iPhone was great (ive never owned one, but apple seemed to do better with low resources than Android).getting people to buy smart phones was a major paradigm shift.
Retina displays are great too, I still use a MacBook with boot camp because for ages there was no other option for a small screen with high resolution.
I can't tell if you're serious or satirical.
Are you saying Face ID is similar in relevance to the development of the smart phone?
In what way does it fundamentally alter our interactions?
I would think this is going to be a pretty big boost to AMD.
They'll be way ahead in multi thread performance per $, and about at parity for single thread performance per $.
The effective 10% boost for AMD is a pretty big deal.
Yelp for restaurants, people love to talk about food, and the yell for that is useful.
Otherwise, Google maps and hope it's accurate (me at least).
Fair point.
It'd be nice if it could fall back to a last known good config like on Windows (not that that ever works, but the way Ubuntu seems to keep old ones seems like it could be made to work).
I guess that's a slight annoyance if it doesn't display for a couple seconds during boot.
Doesn't this just mean pressing down in grub once, then setting it to use that kernel by default?
This is barely even a slight annoyance.
The premise is that minimum wage increase will increase employee pay.
Specifically in the case of remaining minimum wage workers getting laid off due to a minimum wage increase the remaining ones will get more money.
If minimum wage stayed the same, in a couple years the self serve registers would become cheap enough anyway, and the remaining employees would not see a raise as their productivity increased.
But, when a minimum wage hike brings the change a couple years earlier, the remaining employees do see the wage hike.
If they're getting laid off do to increased minimum wage, they will either be unemployed or make more.
They won't be able to find a job making less.
These machines are only replacing cashiers.
That's 1-3 people (depending on time of day) not 5.
I'd average it at 2 (which is honestly high I'd suspect), so you're 2.5x the amount saved.