Why is this illegal? Does it hurt that gay clubs can advertise to just gays, and not cause objections because their ads show up for conservative Christian types?
Problem being, that you only need a handful of writers for the film, which means most people doing the comics are either going to have to be subsidized, or they will have to be fired.
That's the point I'm making. They will literally have to learn how to live on movie money instead of direct sales income. This will require a paradigm shift within comics companies. Either a lot of people doing comics will have to fired and they have to throw most of the effort at movies instead, or they will have to subsidise comics staff.
Do tell us, how did you go from "memory performance in adolescents" to "cancer"? What's the link? Or did you pull it out of your ass, while wearing your pants on your head?
You're either wearing your pants on your head, which would match the initial claim, or you have your brains in your ass. Which is equally matching to your initial claim.
You mean "tiny", because radiation you're exposed to is effectively a function of distance, and it falls off rapidly as distance increases.
Most of the industry tests are done with emitter literally just outside the skull. Gaming and texting people have the phone half a metre away from their head. So the radiation they receive is a tiny portion compared to what is tested for.
Then perhaps you should read it instead of showing that you have no idea what it says? It's not even a long clause, and quite clearly spells out what are the conditions for acting the way they did, and they are quite clearly defined.
Literally, look at the topic. At this point, if you're not working on weapons, you're just setting yourself up to lose the future war, where competitors will not be so internally weak minded as to not research useful tools for warfare.
As it has always been in human history. Decadent empires starting to think they can afford to not match upcoming adversaries is one of the key steps on the path to collapse of said decadent empires.
Concede the point, then desperately try to backpedal pretending you didn't. Truly, I see why you're posting as AC. I wouldn't want being this stupid following me on the site either.
As noted several times above, we're not socialist.
What we are however is more collectivist, and we run high trust societies. This is because of the culture that came out of the unique challenges of living this far north. If you tried resolution methods that put you in conflict with your neighbour, neither of you would likely survive to the next spring. Winters around here are that punishing. All while having almost no population, so relatively little need to competition for land. It's far more important to work than to conquer, because conquerors just can't gather enough resources to effectively survive the winter, something Swedish Crusaders discovered in Finland.
That means that co-operation and societal support of the weakest, as you will need everyone to work the land just to survive. All while maintaining the basic principles of elites' right to ownership of most things formed the core of the culture as you cannot afford to waste any talent - something that is visible to this day in the fact that we all but worship meritocracy in education systems.
And it's why this model is in free fall in Sweden, where MENA cultures that are the exact opposite of our cultures are now taking hold, and finding just how easy it is to abuse the high trust society now that technology prevents environment punishing such behaviour with death. Because MENA cultures are the exact opposite - grown in climate where you can have a massive conflict with your neighbour, and there's still enough food around to survive the winter. All while having enough production to support large population groups, that can feud within and between each other.
Another key point to remember is that Alberta would likely not just go independent. It would join US. Because its oil needs US shale for proper refining, and its economy is actually more integrated into US than Canada because of it.
Not in some distant future. Right now. The hard part of independence/joining another state is already done. And because of it, being in Canada on a different currency makes Albertan economy less efficient. Which is why confederate leadership will never antagonise Alberta beyond the minimum necessary amount. They know the outcome should the push come to shove. It's far too risky.
Ah, so you want only consumer brands, and they must be "properly" branded, as in actual trademark name rather than product.
Hint: when you need to apply so many arbitrary limitations, you're showing that you already have the outcome, and you just need to gerrymander the argumentation to fit it.
Funniest part is, that Nordics have more net benefit from global warming than others. Better climate, more productive farming, opening of Arctic trade routes and resources. It would actually make sense for us to put as much CO2 in atmosphere as we possibly can.
Yet we're world leaders in reducing CO2 emissions. And still there are retards like you who just can't stop sitting on a bandwagon screaming idiocy.
They have a massively positive balance. Not just on cabrohydrates either. They export everything from their famous salmon to things like nickel and aluminium.
When you're so retarded, you don't even know what was someone's platform, but you attribute his name to beliefs you don't like, because that's a last refuge of an ignorant extremist who got caught peddling garbage.
P.S. By your ridiculous redefinition of words, almost every state on the planet is socialist already, because they have all those things. Even in Africa, most states have some socialized medicine, some socialized education, some socialized welfare system, some socialized retirement and some highly regulated corporations.
Just like we do here.
So we have now established that your measuring stick of "socialism" doesn't actually measure anything that is relevant to socialism.
Fun detail. Norway doesn't actually burn it's oil and gas in meaningful amounts. Their electric grid runs mainly on hydro. Carbohydrates are for export.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is this illegal? Does it hurt that gay clubs can advertise to just gays, and not cause objections because their ads show up for conservative Christian types?
You appear to be confusing the indie comics scene with large scale commercial operations.
Problem being, that you only need a handful of writers for the film, which means most people doing the comics are either going to have to be subsidized, or they will have to be fired.
That's the point I'm making. They will literally have to learn how to live on movie money instead of direct sales income. This will require a paradigm shift within comics companies. Either a lot of people doing comics will have to fired and they have to throw most of the effort at movies instead, or they will have to subsidise comics staff.
Unlikely. It's much harder to build an audience than to lose it.
Now that they have the reputation, they're likely fucked for a generation. They'll have to learn to live on the movie profits.
Do tell us, how did you go from "memory performance in adolescents" to "cancer"? What's the link? Or did you pull it out of your ass, while wearing your pants on your head?
He did get booted off Uber according to the story, so he had someone to answer to in the same way as ones you suggest.
You're either wearing your pants on your head, which would match the initial claim, or you have your brains in your ass. Which is equally matching to your initial claim.
You mean "tiny", because radiation you're exposed to is effectively a function of distance, and it falls off rapidly as distance increases.
Most of the industry tests are done with emitter literally just outside the skull. Gaming and texting people have the phone half a metre away from their head. So the radiation they receive is a tiny portion compared to what is tested for.
Then perhaps you should read it instead of showing that you have no idea what it says? It's not even a long clause, and quite clearly spells out what are the conditions for acting the way they did, and they are quite clearly defined.
Literally, look at the topic. At this point, if you're not working on weapons, you're just setting yourself up to lose the future war, where competitors will not be so internally weak minded as to not research useful tools for warfare.
As it has always been in human history. Decadent empires starting to think they can afford to not match upcoming adversaries is one of the key steps on the path to collapse of said decadent empires.
Concede the point, then desperately try to backpedal pretending you didn't. Truly, I see why you're posting as AC. I wouldn't want being this stupid following me on the site either.
As noted several times above, we're not socialist.
What we are however is more collectivist, and we run high trust societies. This is because of the culture that came out of the unique challenges of living this far north. If you tried resolution methods that put you in conflict with your neighbour, neither of you would likely survive to the next spring. Winters around here are that punishing. All while having almost no population, so relatively little need to competition for land. It's far more important to work than to conquer, because conquerors just can't gather enough resources to effectively survive the winter, something Swedish Crusaders discovered in Finland.
That means that co-operation and societal support of the weakest, as you will need everyone to work the land just to survive. All while maintaining the basic principles of elites' right to ownership of most things formed the core of the culture as you cannot afford to waste any talent - something that is visible to this day in the fact that we all but worship meritocracy in education systems.
And it's why this model is in free fall in Sweden, where MENA cultures that are the exact opposite of our cultures are now taking hold, and finding just how easy it is to abuse the high trust society now that technology prevents environment punishing such behaviour with death. Because MENA cultures are the exact opposite - grown in climate where you can have a massive conflict with your neighbour, and there's still enough food around to survive the winter. All while having enough production to support large population groups, that can feud within and between each other.
Get caught trying to gerrymander, gerrymander even harder to pretend you weren't caught. Good job AC. You conceded your point in style.
Another key point to remember is that Alberta would likely not just go independent. It would join US. Because its oil needs US shale for proper refining, and its economy is actually more integrated into US than Canada because of it.
Not in some distant future. Right now. The hard part of independence/joining another state is already done. And because of it, being in Canada on a different currency makes Albertan economy less efficient. Which is why confederate leadership will never antagonise Alberta beyond the minimum necessary amount. They know the outcome should the push come to shove. It's far too risky.
Ah, so you want only consumer brands, and they must be "properly" branded, as in actual trademark name rather than product.
Hint: when you need to apply so many arbitrary limitations, you're showing that you already have the outcome, and you just need to gerrymander the argumentation to fit it.
Yes, and he was told in no uncertain terms to stop lying about us by Danish PM at the time.
But we're not even Western people. We're mongols. Get on with the times.
By your insane re-definition, US is socialist.
Funniest part is, that Nordics have more net benefit from global warming than others. Better climate, more productive farming, opening of Arctic trade routes and resources. It would actually make sense for us to put as much CO2 in atmosphere as we possibly can.
Yet we're world leaders in reducing CO2 emissions. And still there are retards like you who just can't stop sitting on a bandwagon screaming idiocy.
They have a massively positive balance. Not just on cabrohydrates either. They export everything from their famous salmon to things like nickel and aluminium.
You do realise that Norway's oil sales are literally done through an oil company?
When you're so retarded, you don't even know what was someone's platform, but you attribute his name to beliefs you don't like, because that's a last refuge of an ignorant extremist who got caught peddling garbage.
P.S. By your ridiculous redefinition of words, almost every state on the planet is socialist already, because they have all those things. Even in Africa, most states have some socialized medicine, some socialized education, some socialized welfare system, some socialized retirement and some highly regulated corporations.
Just like we do here.
So we have now established that your measuring stick of "socialism" doesn't actually measure anything that is relevant to socialism.
I don't care what US far leftists are desperately trying to sell as socialism in post-Venezuelan world. I'm talking about what it actually means.
I mean, our sad people kill themselves, so I guess it's natural selection.
Fun detail. Norway doesn't actually burn it's oil and gas in meaningful amounts. Their electric grid runs mainly on hydro. Carbohydrates are for export.