clamAV is a scanner, analysing files. the google service is afaik like a dns rbl... it just checks for known bad hashes. Flip a bit, and it won't recognize the virus.
why should amazon pay for this? IF the search is intended, it would be made on the amazon website, if there was no unity dash. And if its unintended, stuff like "gnome-terminal" is only noise for amazon.
no, its only your imap-client, which is confused. A e-mail is deleted, when you delete it. Even when it has 9000 labels. But a imap client is not aware of the label concept, and thinks there are serveral copies of the mail, so it does not instantly notice, that all copies are gone, when you delete one. So you would just need some protocol, which can offer label support instead of creating label-folders for the client.
there are quite different opinions and implementation for ip anonymization, but there is at least a law, which enabled your customers to demand that you inform them what data you save about them, and they can require you to delete it. Because of this, facebook eu is in ireland and not in more privacy friendly countries like germany.
and a very unclean one. It would be like a postinst script, which means the files are still not tracked by dpkg. if its in the rules script, then it would mean, that you package your local files from pip, but do not use pip on the install-system, so nothing is gained.
are you sure? LGPL says, you need to redistribute the changes on the project itself. So its not "viral" when you link dynamically. But if you link statically, your project becomes part of the lib/the lib becomes part of the project, so its one project as result. Then you may be required to give access to the source.
because the main reason for servers there was, that most eu companys need to ensure, that their data is not accessed from countries without reasonable data privacy laws. But it will freshen the cloud market, because eu companies will get a bigger share, which will lead to more competition.
no, in many cases such metadata would be good. if you show photos from some nice place, its a good feature, when the next user can just see the place on googlemaps. Who explicitly DOES NOT want it, can click the "strip place information" option.
there was this case, when aol released search data together with a pseudonymous user-id. Many people got uncloaked, because first they searched for their own name or some other identifiying information, then for something like sex toys.
So the bluetooth-data isn't anonymous, too. Now they have the MAC and your traffic pattern, and when you have your device with you when you're alone somewhere i.e. in a police office, they may collect your MAC and connect it to your full name. When they later get access to the "anonymous" traffic database... it isn't very anonymous anymore.
its not like javascript were the problem of any current browser, but all of them work on improving the js engines instead of taking a break from the x-th js improvement and build a better browser ui. For example mozilla should fix stuff like menubar, favicon, statusbar,... all the "we need to look like chrome" stuff. hey, if i want something which looks like chrome, i use chrome. If there weren't all the extension fixing this crap, maybe i would be a chrome user for a long time, since firefox gave up its own identity and started to clone chrome.
it IS a friend-to-friend network. a bit like freenet in the "darknet" mode.
And a darknet is just anything hidden from normal view. For example networks which need client-software like tor, or forums where you need an invite...
there are laws, which enforce the seperation of ads and content for redactional media. Maybe this does not apply on your blog, but some ad-supported newspaper-sites are bound by these rules.
i can buy a book (copyrighted) and paint some images on its pages. Of course i am not allowed to redistribute copies of my art, but you cannot forbid me to change my copy in any way i want. I could even sell my (one!) copy to somebody else.
Slashdot Mirror
still better than not scanned.
clamAV is a scanner, analysing files. the google service is afaik like a dns rbl ... it just checks for known bad hashes. Flip a bit, and it won't recognize the virus.
but its still nothing, worth paying ubuntu for amazon-searches (which would just take place on the website, if there was no amazon-lense) and noise.
It detects 15% of malicious apps, which would otherwise go undetected. Thats better than not having this service.
why should amazon pay for this? IF the search is intended, it would be made on the amazon website, if there was no unity dash. And if its unintended, stuff like "gnome-terminal" is only noise for amazon.
and where should they profit from? They search online, to make you buy something. not for the sake of searching itself.
> webmail accounts
you mean freemail accounts.
no, its only your imap-client, which is confused. A e-mail is deleted, when you delete it. Even when it has 9000 labels.
But a imap client is not aware of the label concept, and thinks there are serveral copies of the mail, so it does not instantly notice, that all copies are gone, when you delete one. So you would just need some protocol, which can offer label support instead of creating label-folders for the client.
do you know, some email clients even support threads? for example a mailing list is something you cannot display linearly.
there are quite different opinions and implementation for ip anonymization, but there is at least a law, which enabled your customers to demand that you inform them what data you save about them, and they can require you to delete it.
Because of this, facebook eu is in ireland and not in more privacy friendly countries like germany.
isn't youtube built in python?
and a very unclean one. It would be like a postinst script, which means the files are still not tracked by dpkg.
if its in the rules script, then it would mean, that you package your local files from pip, but do not use pip on the install-system, so nothing is gained.
are you sure? LGPL says, you need to redistribute the changes on the project itself. So its not "viral" when you link dynamically. But if you link statically, your project becomes part of the lib/the lib becomes part of the project, so its one project as result. Then you may be required to give access to the source.
because the main reason for servers there was, that most eu companys need to ensure, that their data is not accessed from countries without reasonable data privacy laws.
But it will freshen the cloud market, because eu companies will get a bigger share, which will lead to more competition.
Go, look at soup or tumblr. How many users have the right to distribute even 1% of their "stream"?
no, in many cases such metadata would be good. if you show photos from some nice place, its a good feature, when the next user can just see the place on googlemaps. Who explicitly DOES NOT want it, can click the "strip place information" option.
> What about file systems that don't support metadata like fat
Meta-Data: Stuff like EXIF-Information.
now choose at most 3 of there properties. Then you may get good suggestions for a device.
this "goto recursion" does not crash, because there is no stack to be able to jump back.
who uses the firefox button? Everyone i know just re-enables the menubar.
there was this case, when aol released search data together with a pseudonymous user-id. Many people got uncloaked, because first they searched for their own name or some other identifiying information, then for something like sex toys.
So the bluetooth-data isn't anonymous, too. Now they have the MAC and your traffic pattern, and when you have your device with you when you're alone somewhere i.e. in a police office, they may collect your MAC and connect it to your full name. When they later get access to the "anonymous" traffic database ... it isn't very anonymous anymore.
its not like javascript were the problem of any current browser, but all of them work on improving the js engines instead of taking a break from the x-th js improvement and build a better browser ui. For example mozilla should fix stuff like menubar, favicon, statusbar, ... all the "we need to look like chrome" stuff. hey, if i want something which looks like chrome, i use chrome. If there weren't all the extension fixing this crap, maybe i would be a chrome user for a long time, since firefox gave up its own identity and started to clone chrome.
it IS a friend-to-friend network. a bit like freenet in the "darknet" mode.
And a darknet is just anything hidden from normal view. For example networks which need client-software like tor, or forums where you need an invite ...
there are laws, which enforce the seperation of ads and content for redactional media. Maybe this does not apply on your blog, but some ad-supported newspaper-sites are bound by these rules.
i can buy a book (copyrighted) and paint some images on its pages. Of course i am not allowed to redistribute copies of my art, but you cannot forbid me to change my copy in any way i want. I could even sell my (one!) copy to somebody else.