Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Tablets For Papers; Are We There Yet?

An anonymous reader writes "When I was younger, engineering and science offices didn't have computers yet. It was the tradition: Piled Higher and Deeper desks, and overloaded bookcases. I ended up doing other things, and haven't been in a regular office for a couple of decades. Now I'm older, spending a lot more time with the screen, and finding my aging butt and back aren't as pliable for the long hours of reading papers. And while looking at rather expensive chairs, etc for a solution, what I'm remembering is we used to be able to lean back, feet up, while reading the stapled print-outs — makes a change from hunched-over writing and typing. So I'm what wondering is this: Are We There Yet with tablets? You guys would know — What makes a good tablet for reading, sorting, annotating, and searching PDFs, etc? Hardware and software — what tablets have gotten this really right?"

180 comments

  1. e-readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    n/t.

  2. Ipad and Dropbox! by StonyCreekBare · · Score: 4, Informative

    Works well for me. I just stuff PDFs into my dropbox folder on my desktop, and read em on the iPad. Makes for a happy combination. There is also an Android tablet in the house, works about as well. Seems like a solved problem from my perspective. I never print anything for reading any more...

    1. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      This is the major reason I got an iPad. It works really well to put papers in Dropbox on the pc and view them on the iPad. Tough I may check out iAnnotate for the annotation capability.

    2. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by Neil_Brown · · Score: 4, Informative

      I may check out iAnnotate for the annotation capability.

      iAnnotate was the reason I bought an iPad — I just wanted a tool for reading and marking up hundreds, if not thousands, of PDF documents. I've been hugely impressed, not just with the software, but also the support*. I use it multiple times every day, and am a huge fan.

      I use owncloud on my computers, to keep everything in sync, and, since this can expose things via webdav, it makes syncing with iAnnotate trivial too — it all fits together really rather well.

      *At one point, after their support team had dug into an issue caused by my own stupid fault (incorrect permissions setting on my server, which was causing the synchronisation to fail), I tried my best to convince them to accept a donation, pizza, cash, whatever, to say thank you for their time, as it was worth way more to me than the $10 purchase price, and yet they declined. I could not convince them to accept anything for their efforts.

    3. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by fermion · · Score: 1
      I work through a lot of papers on my iPad. Most documents, including MS Word, pop up and I can read them. I haven't bought a PDF markup App yet, but they are available. Of course the iPad is heavy.

      The kindle fire may be an option. I have had limited luck with the FIre as Amazon seems to want to sell books, so I have not used as much for reading my work stuff.

      The iPad mini is certainly a better form factor, lighter than many tablets, and maybe even has a large enough screen to read for older eyes. Of course, there are many android tablets that can say the same. In the end, the infrastructure for reading on a tablet exists. The only question is finding one that is confortable for individual use.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by hankydysplasia · · Score: 1

      I purchased iAnnotate and PDF Expert for iPad. Journal article reading was the reason I purchased an iPad. I wait for the Retina display because I love not having to zoom around the page to read. I lean toward PDF Expert because the interface is more standard, cleaner, and less gimmicky. It's also being continuously developed with frequent updates. Both programs do pretty much all the same functions, and Dropbox (and other cloud services) syncing means you can switch platforms and devices without losing anything. Annotations are written to the file.

      (I have no association with either company.)
      http://readdle.com/products/pdfexpert_ipad/

    5. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yup. iAnnotate and the iPad are a big part of my workflow now. Hundreds of papers annotated, sorted, searchable and available from Dropbox (important ones on my iPad) any time I need.

      And absolutely when I need to read a paper it goes to DB, onto my iPad and my feet go up.

    6. Re:iPad and Dropbox! by aisnota · · Score: 3, Informative

      iPad App's for BYOD Legal or just student uses. All of them are Apple VPP US/UK vetted, but I am not sure if my notes for the other side of the pond make sense in the context of your publication plan, left in for reference none-the-less and have sold 1,000 or more in that program, make sense for legal papers, term papers with Klammer more of an integration bridge to the Windows world.

      1: Cymbol £1.49 / $1.99
      -- Finally Pilcrow , Section , Trademarks ®, Superscripts and with much more easily tied with your favorite App's on the iPad (Keynote/Pages/Mail/Numbers/Notes/iDraw/iAWriter), with Unicode2Glyph conversion!

      URL https://itunes.apple.com/app/id416714959

      2. iAnnotate £6.99 / $9.99
      Personal favorite for speed, iAnnotate PDF is the most powerful annotation application for the iPad bar none from much experience by yours truly.

      URL https://itunes.apple.com/app/id363998953

      3. Klammer £0.69 / $0.99
      Open EML, Winmail.dat and MSG files (MSG support via in-app purchase) on iPad and view their contents and attachments. All that business communication your device did not view in the Mail application is now accessible to you with just one touch.

      URL https://itunes.apple.com/app/id386777877

      4. Dropbox Free plus storage
      Any file you save to your Dropbox is accessible from all your computers, iPhone, iPad and even the Dropbox website! But the key is mobile tablets and across Linux to other platforms via that web interface.

      URL https://itunes.apple.com/app/id327630330

      Does that outline what you should have now?

      --
      http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
    7. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      And absolutely when I need to read a paper it goes to DB, onto my iPad and my feet go up.

      but your pants go down rite?

    8. Re:Ipad and Dropbox! by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      I find typical journal papers with tiny font are hard to read even on the best 10 inch tablet. Reading the tiny print can be done, but it is really hard to do for more than 10 to 15 minutes without giving your self a headache. I don't think it is so much a function of pixel density at this point as much as it is just overall character size. However, it is not the tablet makers that need to change so much as it is the journal publishers. Maintaining tiny fonts may have been useful in the day when everything was printed, but it gains us nothing in the world of electronic publishing.

  3. Nothing's changed! by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    I work in industrial applications. I don't know if it's the industry or mechanical engineers, but there's a lot of databooks (Omega, Allen Bradley), backup CDs (!) piled high in the same building, etc.. I remember this was the same in 1995. Maybe instead of CDs we had tapes in 95.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  4. Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    iPad 8 will be perfect for you.
    But you won't be able to decide what to read: Apple will decide for you.

    1. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Enough. I swear to the Great Sysadmin in the Sky, I'm fucking sick and tired of the snotty anti-Apple bias n Slashdot. You know what little kids? Back n the early days of Slashdot we really knew how to slam a company. Microsoft was the devil, I was building opm sources tools, and we were going to open the world. Yadda yadda.

      Then I grew up and realized that proprietary platforms have their place. Some companies will work on boring stuff that open source devs don't want to touch. You know, like nice clean UIs. Or simple ways to install and manage software for non-techies. Stuff like that.

      And if proprietary is all at bad, then why does the open source world spend so much time ripping it off? I just discovered an open source RSS reader for Linux that is the spitting image of Reeder for OS X and iOS. It's an exact copy. But that's ok because it's "open" right?

      Fuck I hate the Linux community at times.

    2. Re:Just wait a little. by gothzilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry but it's the source of a great deal of frustration and contention. I got an android before my wife got an iphone. If I wanted to put some music or movies on my phone it was as simple matter of plugging a usb cable and dragging and dropping files. It took both of us an hour to figure out how to get a movie on her phone. Anytime I want to update my media, it only takes a few minutes. When she wants to do the same thing I hear swearing and frustration and how complicated the process is. The final straw was when she got a laptop and synced her phone to it and it wiped everything off her phone, since Apple has decided for her that she can only sync to one library on one computer. So bitch all you want about the snotty anti-Apple bias. Slashdot is a place for geeks who like to be able to actually do what they want with their technology and really don't like it when a company tells us how we will do things, especially when it makes the things we want to do harder and more complicated, if not impossible.

    3. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You know you deserve to die of cancer like your fuck buddy Jobs.

      If you knew the slightest thing about open source and free software you'll realize that why it is important is because it gives you chooses. Something Apple doesn't.

      So, please, get cancer, and then die in an horrific fire. That'll give you a taste of what's to come when you go to hell you Evil Apologist.

    4. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just discovered an open source RSS reader for Linux that is the spitting image of Reeder for OS X and iOS. It's an exact copy. But that's ok because it's "open" right?

      Innovation! ;)

      Fuck I hate the Linux community at times.

      There's your problem. The Slashdot community is not the Linux community, thank the gods.

    5. Re:Just wait a little. by supercrisp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OTOH, I just plug up an iPod Touch, and it syncs perfectly. Upon moving to Android for a phone, it took me a while to find an app that wasn't full of myspace-esque glimmering gimmicks like some 80s boombox; after that it was manually managing files in a folder, which is simple but tedious. That was until I found doubleTwist, which made the Android simple and one-click like the iPhone/iPod Touch. Either iTunes must be really horrible on Windows, or it's because people just have to have their media files all over the drive. And, I know that last one gets a lot of hate: evil Apple oppresses me because it wants my files in one place!!! Well, a) there's an option to not do that, and b) why aren't you also complaining about apps like calibre that do the same thing? And, yes, iTunes wants one library. The model for MacOS is based on individual users that log in, like most modern OSs. So, well, they expect you to do that with iTunes too. And, frankly, it's trivial to get around that with a beginner-level hack (if I can do it, anyone can), or you can buy some $10 piece of shareware to do it for you. No bigs. Sure, Apple stuff is locked down. But not as badly as some say.

    6. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, I just plug up an iPod Touch, and it syncs perfectly. Upon moving to Android for a phone, it took me a while to find an app that wasn't full of myspace-esque glimmering gimmicks like some 80s boombox; after that it was manually managing files in a folder, which is simple but tedious. That was until I found doubleTwist, which made the Android simple and one-click like the iPhone/iPod Touch. Either iTunes must be really horrible on Windows, or it's because people just have to have their media files all over the drive. And, I know that last one gets a lot of hate: evil Apple oppresses me because it wants my files in one place!!! Well, a) there's an option to not do that, and b) why aren't you also complaining about apps like calibre that do the same thing? And, yes, iTunes wants one library. The model for MacOS is based on individual users that log in, like most modern OSs. So, well, they expect you to do that with iTunes too. And, frankly, it's trivial to get around that with a beginner-level hack (if I can do it, anyone can), or you can buy some $10 piece of shareware to do it for you. No bigs. Sure, Apple stuff is locked down. But not as badly as some say.

      Easy with the exaggerations , Steve. As a lifelong family( and extended family, not to mention an entire office), IT engineer current Apple's products are the absolute worst to try to push on to anybody over 50. Almost everybody in my rathger lage family , has wanted and got a form of iSomething in the past 5 years. Vast majority of them sold said iSomething or gave it away within 5 months from it's purchase, for various reasons centered around the ease of use and share-ability. Sure, if you have an Ipod and only want to play music and only own some form of Mac as point of sync, it's quite possibly very easy to life within that arrangement, but try so incorporate some form of productivity over a larger span of environments and you will get in really deep jungle with anything iApple.
      In my house there are 2 desktops, 2 servers, 3 laptops , 5 phones and two tablets. You have a math undergrad, a med student an artist , a second grader and yours truly. At some point all owned an iDevice, presently only the artist still has hers , but only for a few more months, when she can upgrade and will go for a certain device with a white pen. the Med students does the most work that can be related to the OP, as she does a lot of annotations and she has had the second gen iTablet for a while but gave up and moved back to a laptop and later this month will try a laptop with touchscreen.
      Ther point of my ramble: it's not as simple as you make it out to be.

    7. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because it gives you chooses."

      Wow. You shure types gud.

      Please, get literate.

    8. Re:Just wait a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It took both of us an hour to figure out how to get a movie on her phone" - I'm calling bullshit on this, once you're in iTAunes (both the device and media), the process is still just drag and drop. "The final straw was when she got a laptop and synced her phone to it and it wiped everything off her phone" - which it VERY CLEARLY states in a warning box, which she apparently didn't read and clicked proceed anyway.

  5. Problem is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    For a good reading experience you want a large (screen size) and thick (battery size) tablet, which is going to be too heavy to hold comfortably for long periods of time.
    Pure readers with e-ink screens of course are lighter (and cheaper) than tablets with comparable run times, but then you lose all the other applications, tablets bring. Personally I've got both but would kill for usable (and affordable) holographic screens. Until then the answer to the headline's question is: No.
    Obligatory link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines

    1. Re:Problem is by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What? An iPad or equivalent Android has an 8 hour battery which is plenty. Not to mention the OP is probably reading at his desk with power available if needed. It's not too heavy, particularly if you've got your feet up and the thing supported on your legs.

      Holographic screens? Keep dreaming.

    2. Re:Problem is by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      A headline is for an expository piece. So a headline that's a question is intentionally leading. This is an "Ask"-type posting, so the "headline" is just the question. Betteridge's Law, such as it is, doesn't apply.

  6. IPads for sure... by masdog · · Score: 3, Informative

    The iPad has several good PDF reader apps, including some that do annotating. There are a few free PDF readers like BlueFire, but the best one that I've seen is a $5 one called Goodreader for iPad. With the advent of free online storage like DropBox, SkyDrive, or Box, you can put your PDFs online and just download them when you want to read them. I'm sure some of the better Android tablets will also do a pretty good job as a PDF reader, but I haven't gotten my hands on a Galaxy, XyBoard, or Nexus to play with them.

    1. Re:IPads for sure... by sdavid · · Score: 2

      Let me also suggest Goodreader. Goodreader is a lot more than a document reader. It can access Dropbox or network servers and do simple syncing with network drives. I use it to keep my current documents folder synced to my iPhone so I can quickly look up a student's grade or check an old draft of one of my papers. For research files, I use DevonThink, which can sync the desktop version to an iPad client. It also incorporates a workable PDF reader. I can't remember whether it supports annotation, but it can send files to Goodreader if need be. This is such a common use case that I'm sure there are similar applications available for Android tablets, but I'm only familiar with the iOS ones. I'm also hopeful that Windows RT may be useful for this purpose. Since it has a full file manager and can connect to network shares, it could be a great document reader in an office environment. Time will tell there.

    2. Re:IPads for sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To OP
      1. Goodreader
      2. Therefore iPad

      I looked at the iPad, and decided it wasn't for me, until I sat next to someone in a group, and he had his texts on an iPad, and was annotating them.He used iAnnotate, which I've tried, but the UI is too busy for me and gets in the way. Goodreader is neat and clean, and also reads an alphabet soup of other file formats.
      The developer has said there won't be a Goodreader for Android, because it's very deeply tied to iOS features. Pity, because I quite like the look of some 7" tablets.
      iPad Mini is a very useful size for PDF reading, but the better screen on the later iPads would also be good. I've got an iPad 2, which I'll stay with until there's a Mini with more dots.
      I use an iMac, so syncing with iTunes is not a big deal, but it's not as elegant as you'd hope. If Windows or Linux on desktop, nebulous solutions would be good.
      Annotation works well on regular PDFs--I now convert stuff I write myself to PDF to read on the tablet--and also on image only page scans (in my case, Ancient Greek: the pages are still OK to annotate). Goodreader lets you put in visible text on the page, and also little comments bubbles, as well as doing highlighting.
      E-ink is better for reading books, but my Kobo is very poor for PDFs. Ergonomically, a tablet is fine if you put it on a desk or table (I'm old and fat, and have a crappy back), but it would be worthwhile getting some kind of a stand. The magnetic cover Apple sell is good if you will only use the tablet in landscape orientation. A combined case/stand/keyboard might be of use if you do a *lot* of annotation, but I hardly use my keyboard at all (though I might take it with the iPad for travelling use).
      You also get the other uses of a tablet, but reading and annotating PDFs is why I got mine, and it is great; I prefer to watch cat videos on my desktop, though.

    3. Re:IPads for sure... by Silas+is+back · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's astounding how many use Goodreader or iAnnotate on iPad when there is an absolutely fantastic paper management app available in the form of "Papers", made by Mekentosj. It has a Desktop (Mac + PC) counterpart so you can sync, it has all the major search engines built in, supports your university's proxy, has annotation features and what not. I love the thing! (I am not affiliated with that company in any way)

      --
      this sig is useless
    4. Re:IPads for sure... by wolfneuralnet · · Score: 2

      Sorry - there are reasons it isn't mentioned. The sync is awful, its interface isn't great, and there is no cloud support. I hope that now that they have been purchased by Elsevier (yes, really) they will have the manpower to implement over-the-web syncing, but until then its only usable on one Mac (or two if you can remember to quit it on your other machine...) Love the desktop version, can't believe we are stuck without syncing between Macs and iPads still.

    5. Re:IPads for sure... by Silas+is+back · · Score: 1

      I agree that the sync is painful, but it's still better than not having sync (esp. tags and the "read" status) and having to manage papers in folders.

      --
      this sig is useless
    6. Re:IPads for sure... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      GoodReader also has Samba support, so great for accessing network resources. Works with services other than Dropbox as well.

      But, to really use the iPad effectively as a catalog replacement I have needed dedicated apps. Navigating a thousand page catalog on any tablet is an exercise in frustration. Separate files for chapters/sections can help, as long as you don't need to jump between them often.

  7. I am. by zr · · Score: 1

    Can't speak for others.

  8. iPad and iAnnotate by Neil_Brown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't say what is right, but, having finished a masters in law via distance learning, with all my reading done on my iPad, I could recommend this as a solution. iAnnotate worked incredibly well for me, as a tool for reading and annotating PDF documents, which I then synchronised back to the server so they were available for access, including the notes, on my computers for actually writing things up. I'm now testing an iPad Mini, to see whether that offers a better experience — the lower quality screen is bugging me at the moment, but I do like the lighter weight.

    I found the backlit screen irritating at first, but considered it a necessary evil for the benefit of having the annotation functionality, which my previous eReaders did not have. I bought a Kindle a couple of months ago for reading fiction, and found I really struggled with it — I'd rather read on the iPad (via iBooks, usually via DeDRM and Calibre). Perhaps oddly, I find I read much faster on the iPad than on the Kindle, without a noticeable impact on understanding — I wonder if this is due to me being able to scan large blocks of text quite quickly on the iPad but not on the Kindle for some reason. Suffice to say, having been really looking forward to a Kindle — going back to an eReader, having previously have a COOL-ER and a Sony PRS-505 — I was disappointed. My wife, on the other hand, hates reading from a tablet, and carries her Kindle pretty much everywhere.

    1. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Neil_Brown · · Score: 2

      iAnnotate PDF — looks like there is an Android version coming soon too.

    2. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      I'm now testing an iPad Mini, to see whether that offers a better experience â" the lower quality screen is bugging me at the moment, but I do like the lighter weight.

      I'm curious about that, actually. I find the iPad is just slightly too large to make reading really comfortable, at least for long periods of time. However, I've never really read something that I needed to annotate, instead I just end up reading, well, books. For just plain reading I prefer my nook to the iPad for a couple of reasons: it's smaller and lighter, it's easier to hold on to (rubberized cover versus metal), and it has page forward/back buttons on the side.

      But I've never needed to annotate or edit things, so my experience probably isn't very helpful. Note that the nook does support PDFs and you can (in theory) add notes to them, but the way the nook Simple Touch does annotations is very slow and clunky, and PDF support is kind of wonky at best (at least for the ones I've tried). The most annoying thing about the nook software is that you can't zoom in on figures, which probably makes it entirely useless for most users here.

      Actually, that's probably a useful bit of advice: if you're looking for a tablet that you intend to use for scientific use, skip the nook: it can't zoom in on figures in PDFs. At least, I've yet to find a way to do it. Which made reading some of the charts in one of the ebooks I did buy for it, well, flat-out impossible.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      I find the iPad is just slightly too large to make reading really comfortable, at least for long periods of time. However, I've never really read something that I needed to annotate, instead I just end up reading, well, books.

      I used the "fullsize" iPad, and it is that bit too heavy to be comfortable holding it at a good angle to avoid a cricked neck for reading over longish periods. That being said, the retina screen was beautiful to read on, and I miss that on the Mini — perhaps enough to make me return the Mini, and put up with the extra weight.

      I think a huge chunk of this is "what works for you." My wife hates reading on the iPad, and loves her Kindle; I'm struggling with the Kindle, but like reading on the iPad, even though I previously enjoyed reading on eInk devices. Without annotating, I don't retain as much information, or have thoughts easily to hand for reference in the future, so that kind of makes my decision for me anyway, until better annotation support for eInk-based readers is available.

    4. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even after paying $10 for the program, iAnnotate apparently requires users to register with their e-mail address. Privacy lost. And my business lost, too.

    5. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Backlit screens are annoying because the brightness is set too high. When I turn mine down, it is perfectly comfortable to read for a very long time, even in a dark room. I also find that the 7 inch tablets are much better. The other ones are too big and heavy.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      iAnnotate apparently requires users to register with their e-mail address

      It was a good couple of years ago since I first installed it, but I'm pretty cagey about this sort of thing, and don't remember having to give an email address. I think there's an option to register for an online account for some online document conversion functionality, but I haven't done this, and it has not caused me any problems in my use of the application (nor nagged me to do so).

      Perhaps worth double-checking if you are otherwise tempted?

    7. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      I'm already using it (1.13) it isn't too bad but there are a few bugs the major one being the hidden search box. it just needs a minor layout change and it would be spot on for me on Android.

      More of a practical issue is ocring scanned texts. If your pdf is actually a series of pictures search isn't going to work. Some software can ocr but it tends to prefer straight typed lines so if the scan is slightly slanted the success rate of the ocr goes down if successful you can have an image with a hidden text layer behind it which should navigate you to the appropriate page.

      it is a bit of an issue with lecture notes as often you are given a handout you make hand written notes on the handout and you have a bit too much work to do trying to make them into a really useful form for the tablet or laptop or ereader.

      Autodesk do a handy app sketchbook express, its a sketch pad but it is useful for doing quick rough diagrams. it saves a few pages which would be hitting the bin not long after the scribbled idea gets used or rejected.

      Ocr and handwriting recognition both can be issues. I believe the samsung one note has good handwriting recognition but I am not sure what is available for other tablets. A stylus of some sort is useful at times a rounded tip seems to work better than a flat one. There is a problem of storing a stylus with many tablets as they were not designed with this kind of input in mind.

      Most tablets will support bluetooth keyboards and mice, some have full size usb host ports that will take a wireless keyboard dongle or an external hdd On android I find adb push foo.bar /mnt/storage a useful command yes i could connect to the network mount a share and copy, or copy to a flash drive or micro sd card but adb is less hassle. I've not tried scanning directly to my tablet yet My Archos 101 g9 does support dual boot of ubuntu and ics so i'd be optimistic that ubuntu could use my scanner directly and i can write to a shared location such as the mico sd card. Android has an interesting take on printer drivers I can share my printers with googles cloud printing service and run a service (built into/ shipped with the chrome browser). so tablet to cloud , cloud to my netbook and over my lan to my printers connected to my nas (running debian).

      One more issue some pdf files are locked and cannot be edited or annotated. Some software will ignore this and let you annotate others will not.

                 

    8. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Papers

      http://www.mekentosj.com/papers/ipad

    9. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      so you gin up a Throwaway address and don't worry about such things.

      Is it that they dare to ask for a contact address or worry about some sort of tracking??

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    10. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Neil_Brown · · Score: 4, Informative

      Autodesk do a handy app sketchbook express, its a sketch pad

      I note you are using Android, so my suggestion may not be worthwhile, but I am using PenUltimate for all my hand-written notes, and, for that simple task, it does an excellent job. No OCR, but, frankly, I'm not sure how much processing power you'd need to throw at my handwriting...

      One more issue some pdf files are locked and cannot be edited or annotated. Some software will ignore this and let you annotate others will not.

      I may be able to help you here, if you have access to a Linux machine (heck, it may work natively on Android; I don't know): use ghostscript to assist in removing the lock. I have this as unlock_pdf.sh:

      #! /bin/bash

      # takes specified file and prints output using ghostscript

      gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=output.pdf -c .setpdfwrite -f $1

      Just save the file in question to your machine, and run sh unlock_pdf.sh pdfname.pdf and wait for output.pdf to be generated.

      There may be better ways of doing this, but this has worked pretty well for me over the last couple of years, so I hope it offers some assistance.

    11. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That image is NSFW and is an amateur version of goatse. Mod down.

    12. Re:iPad and iAnnotate by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Acrobat Pro will straighten text as it OCRs, and it tends to be sufficiently accurate. It also will blow thru just about all of the ways a PDF can be locked. I think I've only had to turn to another piece of software once or twice since I've been using PDFs for research. I think most academic/research PDF peddlers just flip some "don't modify me" bit, which Acrobat Pro can undo.

  9. Big Chief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Been using them since Kindergarten.

  10. iPad and Sente by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac-only...but iPad with Sente let's you read and markup PDFs and syncs everything with your desktop (via an online server). It also pulls info about papers from academic databases and works as a reference manager for writing papers.

    It worked a treat during my phd...dealing with 1000s of PDFs.

  11. iPad with GoodReader by adenied · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife is finishing up her PhD in a biological science field. A couple years ago she was carrying like 70+ printed out papers around with her so she could reference them when writing at home or at a coffee shop. She got an original iPad and started using GoodReader and said it changed the game completely for her. She's on an iPad 3 now but the effect is the same.

    I got her old iPad when she upgraded and I loaded literally a couple thousand papers and other documents I've saved over the years (mostly IEEE and ACM papers and a ton of standards documents I reference for work), luckily all already organized. GoodReader will let you load things and keep whatever directory/folder organization you have. It's great!

    1. Re:iPad with GoodReader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you transfer/export the annotations? This sounds interesting, but depending on one device and one piece of software won't work for me if I want to come back toa subject 5 years from now.

    2. Re:iPad with GoodReader by Neil_Brown · · Score: 2

      Can you transfer/export the annotations?

      I use iAnnotate rather than GoodReader, and the annotations are added to the PDF directly — open the annotated PDF on my computer, and the annotations are there. There is also an option to export the annotations on their own — I've occasionally used this when I have highlighted key parts of a text and wanted to extract these to a new file, for a quick reference / summary.

    3. Re:iPad with GoodReader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed.. I have dozens of ANSI, IEEE and CCSDS docs on my iPad, along with hundreds of journal articles, along with a complete set of navigation charts (easier to put them all on, rather than just a few), etc. Nautical Almanac, Sight reduction tables (I was into celestial nav for a while). Goodreader saved me. (iBooks doesn't deal with this well)

    4. Re:iPad with GoodReader by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      For the last paper I had published the journal actually had iAnnotate Pro instructions for correcting the galley proofs.

    5. Re:iPad with GoodReader by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      You can add them to the PDF in good reader, and I believe there is another means of storing them as well.

  12. Company to Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you work for a good company, then yes, things have changed. The new iPad also lets you make notes on the page that you are reading as well. I just want to sit on a couch with coffee or tea and read my documents.

  13. No, not really... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Things have gotten better; but I'd say that we aren't there yet.

    E-ink has gotten good enough for light reading of anything that reflows adequately(and cheap enough that there is little risk in giving it a shot); but the refresh rate and available panel sizes and resolutions still make serious PDF crunching rather ugly.

    The newer iPads have the resolution and speed to do PDFs justice; but capacitive touchscreens aren't exactly god's gift to stylus-based annotation. Yeah, they sell capacitive styluses; but it isn't exactly a Wacom...

    "Traditional" tablet PCs had the Wacom pen input for annotation; but some mixture of technical limitations and PC OEM tastelessness always made them slower, clunkier, and more tethered to their AC adapter than was ever entirely comfortable.

    If I had the cash, and really wanted to get away from the 'just-a-decent-laser-printer' solution, I'd strongly consider a portrait-oriented Cintiq display mounted on an ergotron-style floating arm. A Cintiq 22 or 24 is far too heavy to treat like a tablet; but the arm should give it effectively zero weight, and you'll get reasonably high resolution and excellent pen input.

    1. Re:No, not really... by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A friend recently got a 10.1 inch Galaxy Note, and he raves about the stylus. It literally is a Wacom tablet that doubles as a screen. You might give that a try.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    2. Re:No, not really... by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, technically, we were there, and the industry decided to start moving backwards.

      I still use a Thinkpad X61 tablet which has a 1400x1050 screen (150 ppi) and a wacom digitizer. I've been using it to annotate PDF's for years. However, it's on it's last legs but there is still nothing to replace it with.

      I made a paper cutout of the size of the screen for 10.1" and 11.6" and 13.3" Windows 8 devices at 1080p, which have respectively 218, 190, and 166 ppi. (In my opinion, 150 ppi is the absolute minimum to be able to read subscripts in a full-page maximized document). You'll notice that all these 16:9 screens are substantially narrower and taller than a sheet of paper. (16:9 is an aspect ratio of 1.78, while 8.5"x11" paper is 1.29) So maximizing the width of a full page on a portrait TV-screen gives you closer to 1.5 pages at a time. The old 4:3 monitors were perfect for documents in portrait mode (aspect ratio 1.33 -- so enough room for a toolbar). Why in the bloody dripping hell everyone decided to use TV screens for computer displays boggles my mind. On the most common Windows 8 screen size, 11.6" at 1080p, an 8.5"x11" document is compressed into a 5.69"x7.36" space. How good are your eyes? For those of you with your calculators out, that's less than half the area of the original 8.5"x11" paper. Sure you could zoom it, welcome to an unending hell of fiddling with scrollbars on a tablet device. Oh and don't forget those 1" document margins wasting screen space. Do you know a good PDF reader that can reliably zoom away margins for screen reading? Neither do I.

      The only reasonable upcoming windows 8 device, in my opinion, is the Asus Taichi, the 13.3" version of which has been indefinitely delayed. :-(

      Everything else on the market either has: too small of a screen or no digitizer. So, in case anyone from the industry is reading this, bring back 4:3 screens, make them around 14" diagonal with very small bezels and while you're at it, give us > 200 PPI or higher and resistive digitizers!!!. An 8.5"x11" sheet of paper has a diagonal size of 13.9". There's a huge market out there that is unsatisfied. Everyone on the damn planet uses paper, and we need devices that emulate paper use-cases. The OP and myself would definitely buy such devices. Screw Apple and their narrow-minded "no stylus" initiative. Paper has been in use for thousands of years. It's not going to stop tomorrow.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    3. Re:No, not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a hugely overlooked feature of some new win 8 tablets/convertibles.... a digitizer! Apart from drawing a colored line in some paint program, a capacitive screen, even with a pen is USELESS. With a digitizer I will be looking forward to finally moving away from paper for engineering diagrams and math input.

    4. Re:No, not really... by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      The newer iPads have the resolution and speed to do PDFs justice; but capacitive touchscreens aren't exactly god's gift to stylus-based annotation. Yeah, they sell capacitive styluses; but it isn't exactly a Wacom...

      The Samsung Note tablets are not just capacitive. They can distinguish between your fingers and the pen. It's not even modal. In other words, if you're reading something, you can just use your finger(s) to flip the pages and the pen to highlight what you want. The tablet even knows when you're just hovering your pen over it, or whether you're actually touching the screen with it. It's quite amazing.

      My only recommendation is that you if you get such a tablet, you get the latest version of the Note -- not the original Note. Samsung did a much better job integrating this technology in their latest version.

    5. Re:No, not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okular's "Trim margins" mode works well for me. If you're on Windows, there's the KDE on Windows project, which has a functioning Okular binary: http://windows.kde.org/

    6. Re:No, not really... by qvatch · · Score: 1

      goodreader (ios) can cut margins. Its not automatic, but it is very quick and it remembers. I can comfortably read papers on my ipod, although scrolling (with helpful jump buttons) is necessary.

    7. Re:No, not really... by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surface Pro will come with a pen and active digitizer.

      --
      This space for rent.
    8. Re:No, not really... by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      I have a Galaxy Note II, and I can even read and annotate papers with that, albeit with some panning around. If I were still an academic reading papers all the time I'd buy a Note 10.1 tablet immediately. It's fantastic for that and note-taking.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    9. Re:No, not really... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I just print out what I need on an 11x17 inkjet, mark it up, and store it in a 3 ring binder.

      My big desktop monitors, which work like crap in portrait orientation because of viewing angle problems, are not sufficient for most of the PDF files I deal with so no portable device is going to hack it. Even if I did find a tablet that could handle it, how am I going to view more than one page at a time?

    10. Re:No, not really... by mcelrath · · Score: 1

      Multiple tablets. 11x17 has a 1.55 aspect ratio, which is closer to 16:8=1.78 than 8.5x11. The zoom factor is horrible though, nearly 1/4 the area of a full-width page on 8.5x11 vs 11.6 diagonal. Seriously, we need to lobby for tablets matching common paper sizes, at 200-300dpi, not movie and game devices awkwardly adapted to non-frivolous uses.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    11. Re:No, not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * And when having multiple documents open, make each reading window *scalable* in size
                  o We can have multiple documents open on Windows but not scalable document size
                  o We can have scalable "document" size on Safari on iPhone (pinch gesture), but not multiple "documents" open

    12. Re:No, not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 10 inch 4:3 Ipad or an 11.6 inch 16:9 Windows 8 tablet can show an A4 page at A5 size, which is perfectly fine for many of us. I am already in the habit of printing papers 2-up on paper, so that the effective size is exactly the same. Unlike paper, tablets allow easy zooming. On the other hand you need a 300 dpi Nexus 10 to reach even the lowest resolution you can get out of a laser printer, whereas practically all printers can easily do 1200 dpi.

    13. Re:No, not really... by mcelrath · · Score: 1

      Ipads are great, especially the latest one, except that the screen is slightly small, and writing with a capacitive stylus is worse than crayons. I need a resistive digitizer to write equations.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    14. Re:No, not really... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I will have to give the Note a look. The Wacom RF tech is spooky accurate(and, incidentally, pretty cool looking. An entire multi-layer PCB antenna array, sorry about the shitty scan, crammed in behind the screen.) Trouble always was that the 'Tablet PC's were still basically just laptops with particularly unreliable hinges and the freestanding tablets(in addition to being alarmingly expensive) didn't allow you to write on whatever you were annotating...

  14. Kindles are the way to go by Dan93 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or any e-reader tablet that uses e-ink (unlike kindle fires). I find that it's just as easy to read as print without the eyestrain that comes from reading LCD screens. Also the battery on those things are AMAZING. I rarely have to charge mine more than once per month.

    1. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Cinder6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Much as I love my Kindle, it's not quite there for PDFs. While great for text (e.g. novels), it can't reflow a PDF well (or at all?), and the screen size makes it too small to reasonably view most PDFs at full size. A Kindle DX might be better, but still not ideal. Obviously color will be a no-go.

      I would recommend an iPad or something similar for technical documents and most other PDFs. Goodreader + Dropbox is a great combination.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    2. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iRiver Story HD. It's got the higher resolution (768x1024), SD card slot (unlike the Kindles), handles PDF and djvu in addition to epub, and has great support for organizing files in folders.

    3. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can they handle pdfs well?

    4. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Dan93 · · Score: 1

      I'll keep that in mind for the next e-reader I get.

    5. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Dan93 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're handle PDFs, but you have to turn them on their side because of the small screen size. That can make it inconvenient, but I personally don't have problem with it.

    6. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Threni · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a DX. Do they still make them? Can you buy them in the UK? It sounds ideal for this sort of thing - just show the pages as-is.

      I have no idea why PDFs are such a dog to work with. I mean, I appreciate that it's a shitty format which wasn't designed to (re)flow, but how hard can it be to handle this adaptation in software? I'm sure you can come up with pathological cases which are tricky, but most ebooks I've seen would appear to be `text here..picture here...header/footer/page numbers where you'd expect them to be`. Problem?

    7. Re:Kindles are the way to go by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Much as I love my Kindle, it's not quite there for PDFs. While great for text (e.g. novels), it can't reflow a PDF well (or at all?), and the screen size makes it too small to reasonably view most PDFs at full size. A Kindle DX might be better, but still not ideal. Obviously color will be a no-go.

      I would recommend an iPad or something similar for technical documents and most other PDFs. Goodreader + Dropbox is a great combination.

      I agree for the PDFs and even eBooks that have diagrams or pictures, Kindle is not convenient. However a few months ago I lost my Kindle and decided to read stuff on my tablet, and what happened is that I basically stopped reading. Instead of sitting for a few hours and reading books I ended up picking up the tablet, firing up the eReader app but quickly switching to email, web browsing and games. I stayed less longer in coffee shops, doodling around on the tablets and getting restless quickly.

      Then I bought a new Kindle and immediately I went back to reading a lot (usually two books a week). My tablet is now a living room fixture for when I watch a movie; when I go to a coffee shop I bring my Kindle and use my phone if I want to check my emails, which happens a lot less often when I read.

      With my first Kindle I used to turn the wifi off to save battery but with the new one I find that I actually like the always-connected approach. I like to take notes and it's convenient that they follow my Amazon account, it makes it easier for me to go and buy a few books to dig a little more in a topic I found interesting. The Kindle is as convenient for buying books than the iPod Touch for buying music.

      Tablets are great to read articles, emails and view diagrams. For books there is nothing like the Kindle (it's even better than actual books!).

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      They still sell the Kindle DX, though it hasn't been updated in a long time (which is too bad), so it doesn't have the newer features--it's a lower PPI display and no backlight. Searching for it on amazon.co.uk yields nothing, so it looks like that's a no-go. You could undoubtedly get one off eBay, but I'm not 100% sure it would work outside the US, so I'd check on that before doing anything.

      As for why PDFs are so tricky... I've never looked at the spec, nor tried to write an eReader app, but PDFs are designed to be print-ready, which I would assume to mean that the layout of elements (text, graphics) is specified absolutely. In an eBook file, such as MOBI or EPUB, the text is actually basically stored as web pages. Where an eBook file says "next have this chapter division", the PDF probably says "put this text at coordinate (500,250), bold," etc.

      Once again, I could be wrong; maybe someone else can chime in. But if what I described is indeed the case, it makes sense that it's hard to translate it to something that reflows well--there's no semanticity like there is in a proper eBook file.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    9. Re:Kindles are the way to go by jsdcnet · · Score: 1

      You're basically correct. PDF stands for *PAGE* description format. It is intended to specify exactly how big the page is, and where all the elements go on it. epub/mobi and similar e-reader formats are mainly HTML/CSS inside, so they can reflow just like any other web page.

      --
      no longer working for cnet
    10. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      PDF actually stands for Portable Document Format.

    11. Re:Kindles are the way to go by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      I bought a DX from amazon.com (delivered to the UK). It has the same setup as the International version of the standard Kindle used to have before they decided they'd sell those on Amazon UK - Whispernet from anywhere, and I think once they started selling Kindles on Amazon UK they did give the opportunity to move to the UK service overall.

      I found the DX to be great for reading A4 PDFs, even the ACM-style two-column layouts. For reading novels and so forth it is merely acceptable; comically oversized, really, like the iPad.

      You're pretty much right about PDFs, pragmatically at least, although some reflow more easily than others. Authors do have the option to tag PDFs, indicating what can be reflowed and in what order - it's an accessibility feature. However, since very few people have any idea that this option even exists and most PDF creation workflows don't really provide the option, the feature isn't, practically, much of a game changer.

    12. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I read a few books on my iPad before I sold it. While I did manage to several long novels (The Way of Kings, most of the Death Gate Cycle, Malazan series, etc.), I agree that there's a huge temptation to do other stuff on it. I imagine it would only be worse now, what with seemingly every app using push notifications.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    13. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      The iPad might be a bit large for books, but I actually liked it in iBooks: put it in landscape mode and it shows two pages at once, just like a paper book.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    14. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kindle DX is great, but it has been discontinued. You can buy only used ones now.

    15. Re:Kindles are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PDF actually stands for Portable Document Format.

      THIS. And the fact that there are actually about 6 or 8 different kinds of PDFs. There's the kind you create using Acrobat as a sort of Word-type editor. Completely editable, because it was created like a document. Then there's image-only, which, as you would surmise, is just a scanned image.Then there's image-with-embedded-text, which is basically an image (scanned) PDF that has been OCRed so you can search it. Then there are several really obscure types, including Archive - not sure what they do that is special.

      But the important thing is they are basically PostScript, and most e-readers do not have good PDF reading engines in them. I have on older Kindle, and a DX (love the big screen!), and an original Nook, and they are all shit for viewing PDFs. iPad has never failed me, no matter what the PDF was.

    16. Re:Kindles are the way to go by cabbi · · Score: 1

      I'm a scientist at UC Berkeley and I have been using a Kindle DX for the last 2 years for papers. I spend hours in front of a computer screen and sometimes really need something to read that doesn't glow. However, the DX is still not great. It is 9.5 inches diagonal in the readable screen area. A normal piece of paper is almost 14 inches diagonal. Text is either too small (and my aging eyes have a hard time with that), or I have to place it sideways and shift back-and forth 4 times to read 1 page. I'm disappointed with the move towards smaller devices like the galaxy or the ipad mini and active screens like the kindle fire. For me, a 8x11" e-ink screen would be ideal.

  15. Closest thing I've found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The closest thing I've found is the Onyx Boox M92. 9.7" e-ink display and a fast enough processor for rendering PDF documents with diagrams. Still not quite good enough, though.

    (Ignore the people suggesting iPads and the like. An illuminated display is guaranteed to give them eyestrain problems eventually, even if they claim they're having no problems now.)

    1. Re:Closest thing I've found... by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      Ignore the people suggesting iPads

      There's always a trade-off — for me, I'd rather ensure I was reading in good lighting conditions, and reading for reduced periods and taking regular breaks, but with the ability to make annotations and the like easily, than to be able to read for considerable periods and lack that support. Without annotating, I'd end up reading things multiple times, which wouldn't work so well.

      (I really, really wanted to use an eInk reader for studying, having loved reading fiction on them, but I found that they just did not work for me, hence getting the iPad. Now, having got myself a Kindle for my leisure reading, I find I struggle to read on it, and would rather read on a tablet screen, as I find reading far faster. Two and a bit years ago, before having used a tablet for all the reading for a reading-heavy course, I would have pushed an eReader too — having seen what worked for me, I've got a slightly different view.)

    2. Re:Closest thing I've found... by Dan93 · · Score: 1

      Most e-readers allow annotations, including kindles.

    3. Re:Closest thing I've found... by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      Most e-readers allow annotations, including kindles.

      From memory — it was some time since I checked, and perhaps a software update has improved things — some basic annotation was possible on the Kindle, but it was not at all easy, particularly to type anything of more than a few words. I'll see if things have improved — thanks for the heads-up.

    4. Re:Closest thing I've found... by jimbo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure about eyestrain being absolutely guaranteed, AC. I've stared a screens professionally since 91 and have read books on LCDs since they started showing up, on average a book every two weeks. I do adjust the backlight though.

      I'd admit, the Palm III wasn't exactly equivalent of a thousand suns but the iPaq had a modern LCD.

  16. Standing tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is another way: a standing table. If you can have a normal table and a standing table, and a normal notebook, you're done.

    1. Re:Standing tables by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      There is another way: a standing table

      I second this. I use this arm to mount a 27" monitor from an overhead shelf. I pivot it between a stand-up desk and an adjacent bed. I work about two hours standing up, then pivot the monitor and work another hour lying flat on my back, then repeat. The only time I sit in a chair is for meals and meetings (and I usually combine those).

  17. we are NOT there yet. by Lluc · · Score: 3, Informative

    LCD screen tablets == eyestrain after a long reading period. If you do not read for long periods of time, perhaps a 10" would work for you.
    E-Ink screens are too small and/or too slow to render a typical journal article well.

    1. Re:we are NOT there yet. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LCD screen tablets == eyestrain after a long reading period.

      Turn the brightness down. It makes a big difference. When I discovered that, all those problems went away.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:we are NOT there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOOHOO! Mods on the attack!

    3. Re:we are NOT there yet. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Indeed, we are NOT there yet.

      Remember, humans are still meat-bags. We still need to mark-up and underline and scribble notes –– to sort our thoughts. When reviewing, I still print and scribble to organize my analysis. My final review is indeed typed into a browser, but the process is still not reasonably do-able without the intermediary stage of physicality.

      Nothing is faster than a pen on paper, nor is it likely to be any time soon.

      Give me a tablet that I can spread out over my desk, enabling me to compare 8 pages at a time, to stick my fingers and post-its in for quick back-and-forth referencing, and I will buy it. Until then, paper will remain king for complex writing, reviewing, and editing.

      Sorry.

    4. Re:we are NOT there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, no book search system is faster or more intuitive than the trusty flip-the-pages-with-your-thumb maneuver.

      Digital systems have huge advantages, however, in terms of broad, lateral search and physical size per document.

      I think that means we're going to be living in a world with both paper and digital systems together for a while yet.

    5. Re:we are NOT there yet. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sitting in a dark room with a spotlight shining on your e-ink screen will give you eyestrain too. Turn the brightness down. Your eyes don't know whether the photons are reflected or not.

    6. Re:we are NOT there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could learn how to blind. Most people that has problems with dry eyes, eyestrain and headaches due looking into monitors usually forgot how to blink.

    7. Re:we are NOT there yet. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Brother do eink "document readers" with an A4 or 10" display. I have not tried one personally and they are pretty expensive, but are designed for exactly what the questioner wants to do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:we are NOT there yet. by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      There are paperlike color screens capable of playing video. They are so fast they actually alternate between colors to display more colors like Plasma TVs do.

      Check out Mirosol displays. I don't know why these aren't popular in the US yet. http://www.qualcomm.com/mirasol

    9. Re:we are NOT there yet. by Lluc · · Score: 1

      There are paperlike color screens capable of playing video. They are so fast they actually alternate between colors to display more colors like Plasma TVs do. Check out Mirosol displays. I don't know why these aren't popular in the US yet. http://www.qualcomm.com/mirasol

      I saw a demo of one by the original e-ink company running a cartoon at about 15fps. It was also a touch screen. Pretty impressive, but apparently they lose their power advantage over LCDs when they are running at high frame rates. Since it is possible to refresh these screens at 66msec or better, I'd guess that the weak link in the e-ink nook and kindle must be the cpu. Again, this is probably for power reasons.

    10. Re:we are NOT there yet. by PuZZleDucK · · Score: 1

      Also, no book search system is faster or more intuitive than the trusty flip-the-pages-with-your-thumb maneuver.

      No way, are you crazy? I was forced to use hard copy when I started my job... when I finally convinced them to let me use digital searching got so much faster. You can't find all occurances of "maximum value" or "s3.2.3" in a 300 page document quicker on paper than on digital. It is just not possible to search print faster than digital.

      --
      Can a person program a new solution to a problem? Why should anyone be able to stop such a thing? -Richard Stallman
  18. nook or kindle (e-ink versions, not HD) by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    For long hours of reading, I have to suggest a tablet with e-ink. But since everyone is different, you should try them out in the stores first.

    I personally own a nook touch, which is probably the least liked tablet on /., but I really enjoy it. Since it's e-ink, the interface is slower and less responsive, but you get used to it. I look at a computer screen all day, so it's nice to read on a device that reflects light similar to paper rather than another screen shining it at me. I can read for noticeably longer with less eye strain.

    The upsides are of course built-in dictionary, highlighting, bookmarking, notes, etc. The dictionary and bookmarks are really the best part. The downsides are no built-in browser (does kindle have one?) -- so can't search wikipedia and/or another dictionary site -- and none of the apps or eye candy and the small size. Solely for reading, e-ink versions reign supreme in my opinion. If you don't think reading will be the primary focus, then of course go for iPad or an Android tablet with HD.

    --
    The G
    1. Re:nook or kindle (e-ink versions, not HD) by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      The nook touch's have the android browser it's just hidden.

      If you really want a browser, root it and install Opera. I read manga on mine. Having the kindle app on it can be useful as well. Still prefer my tablet for pdf's though.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  19. samsung note tablet by godrik · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am frequently checking the state of tablet technology to do paper annotation. I write and annotate documents a lot. And any interface which is not paper and pencil like is typically useless to me. So all the tablet tend to be terrible on their own. I had a look at those stylus for ipad, that's better but still not enough. It is too imprecise which prevent proper annotation and drawings

    Though, Itried a galaxy note (the phone one) with the spen, and that was a very convenient device to annotate a document. Except it is phone size so it is too small for real life use. The tablet version should be perfect. If you want to annotate stuff, you should check it out and see if it works for you.

  20. The wrong question? by greenreaper · · Score: 2

    Focusing on the existing structure of papers, PDFs and the like restricts our vision. We should be asking ourselves what is the best way to communicate information, and then figure out what devices can enable that.

    1. Re:The wrong question? by Neil_Brown · · Score: 2

      We should be asking ourselves what is the best way to communicate information, and then figure out what devices can enable that.

      As part of the bigger picture, and the future of information sharing and knowledge creation, I agree fully with you.

      As someone with a stack of documents in .pdf which I needed to read, my immediate need was finding a device which could enable me to do that :)

    2. Re:The wrong question? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Anything with x and lisp.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  21. from one geezer to another... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest that you look at several of the eReaders out there.

    My local Staples has the Kindle and B&N has the Nook. For reading, I prefer the matte screen with eInk. A lot stress on the eyes. Added bonus is the longer battery life than the full color versions. And cheap as heck.

    My Motorola Android Razr Maxx makes a good portable eReader as well, but for eBooks only. Not so much on PDFs which don't resize well..

    Personally, I can't stand extensive reading on the iPad, although my daughter did get a piece of software for writing screen plays, forgot the name, but it does make the screen a bit easier to take.

  22. MS Surface or ASUS Transformer by Orcris · · Score: 1

    Every major tablet OS has the right tools for doing this. I would suggest getting a tablet with a keyboard (like the MS Surface or ASUS Transformer Pad), or getting a 10 inch tablet with a bluetooth keyboard.

  23. well ... by overshoot · · Score: 1

    I think I'm officially a geezer (past 60) and I'm spending Saturday afternoon in the lab taking notes on a 10" Galaxy Note, and while theDUT temperature stabilizes I'm catching Lagrange and checking /. All that said, I still ease my old eyes by killing trees for large schematics. Don't knock 300 dpi on 22"x17"

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  24. Lovely paper by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    I still like paper. But I was mocked just the other day by a co-worker for drawing a diagram by hand with a pen and ink, no less. I may be a dinosaur.

    1. Re:Lovely paper by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, he did spell Visio as Vizio while doing so so I got the last laugh.

  25. Ipad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's Ipad is the way to go.

  26. Papers? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    What sort of papers are we talking about?

    Newspapers? You can already get most respected newspapers in an app, or ebook format.

    Papers please? For keeping official documents on, like an electronic green card - I doubt the red states would accept it yet.

    But the other sort of paper - if your sitting in the bathroom reading on your tablet and you find theres no toilet paper - well i don't think your tablet will do a good job of wiping your arse...

  27. six of one by burdickjp · · Score: 1

    Right now he's reading things on a desktop...which likely has an LCD display. This would, in my book, nullify most arguments against LCD display tablets. No, they aren't perfect, but they're no worse than the alternative. Maybe the new wave of Win8 tablets would be good? Alot of them have active stylus inpt capabilities. I use a Dell Latitude ST for all of my ME classwork. All of my textbooks are on it. I use OneNote for assignments. It works very well, even with Windows 7, which is not a very touch-friendly OS.

  28. Mendeley / Xournal + Thinkpad X230t by gmeb · · Score: 1

    For keeping a collection of papers, Mendeley is great! It's possible to annotate the papers with notes and a yellow marker. The yellow marker can behave a little bit erratic at times though -- Xournal behaves better in that regard, but it doesn't keep track of a collection of papers.

    The best tablet IMO is a Thinkpad X230t (t for tablet): you can use it as a regular laptop to do real work, but fold it over and with its pen, you have the ideal user interface to take notes just as you would on paper. I still regret that I chickened out a few years ago and bought a "regular" Thinkpad X201 instead of a X201t...

    --
    The angry man always thinks he can do more than he can. -- Albertano of Brescia
    1. Re:Mendeley / Xournal + Thinkpad X230t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a shame that Lenovo management ditched the high-resolution screen options that IBM used to offer. Fortunately, now that everyone else is starting to offer 1920x1080 on small screens, Lenovo is finally getting back to higher resolutions: Thinkpad Helix is supposed to have a 11.6 inch 1920x1080 screen. But it looks like we're going to have to wait a long time before we get anything comparable to a Retina Macbook Pro.

  29. Try strand up tables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A number of people where I work have or are getting stand up tables. I am considering this myself. We a spend a lot of time sitting and meetings and standing up whIle writing code sounds good.

  30. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the change-refusing generation that fights their 1970ties daytime routine with teeth and claws has to die out.

  31. Papers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me the answer is very simple. There is an amazing app called "Papers" that you can get on OSX, Windows, and iOS. iPad 3 or 4 with retina display make figures and tiny text look amazing. The best alternative on iOS to Papers is an app called Mendeley, which is also cross-platform.

  32. Ergonomics by Wolfling1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    My company makes software for allied health professionals, and a large number of our customers are chiropractors. They are starting to use tablets quite extensively for recording their medical notes, so I am perfectly positioned to offer a slightly tangential response. Full disclosure: I am not a chiropractor - I've just worked with thousands of them, so I know a bit about spines and posture.

    Subby, you mentioned that your back isn't what it used to be. This is an important factor.

    During our lab trials of tablets, we received a lot of feedback about the ergonomics of tablets - and one tester actually had to be excused from testing after a measly 15 minutes due to neck pain developing. Here's the problem:
    - A tablet has a very small screen. Don't let anybody trick you into thinking that a 10.1" screen is big. Its not. You have to hold the tablet quite close to your face to be able to read it comfortably.
    - Even the lightest tablets still have significant weight. You can safely anticipate that your tablet will weigh about a kilogram.
    - When you hold a kilogram weight up in front of your face, it distorts your body's centre of balance. In order to compensate, your body transfers weight either resulting in you leaning backwards, or sticking your backside out. Either of these are posturally abnormal positions. For the first 5 minutes, no problems - but for extended periods, this can (and likely will) result in back pain, neck pain and headaches. Over weeks and months, it will damage your spine.
    - The alternative is to sit in a relaxed position and hold the device in your lap. Sounds good until you realise that your entire body is falling into a C shape (when seen from the side). This is also an abnormal position for the spine - and creates the same problems. We see a lot of x-rays of children who spent excessive time with the iPod/PST/handheld device in their lap - their spine is worse than that of a 40 year old.

    In the end, we published an official white paper advising our customers that A) tablets work fine; the technology is sound and reasonably mature; B) we DO NOT recommend that they use them.

    1. Re:Ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, where is the paper?
      Can you point us to a draft?

    2. Re:Ergonomics by guruevi · · Score: 1

      And then you go on to sell them an overly expensive solution right?

      The thing is tablets work fine. Dead Tree Books are way heavier than tablets (the average tablet now weighs ~0.5kg and the better ones (Apple, Samsung) have never weighed over 0.6kg so your premise is BS).

      8-10" is plenty, most books don't even get that big plus you can zoom and turn the brightness down to a comfortable reading level. Put a leather cover on and you won't even notice it's not real paper.

      If you just want to lay back and read, you would need some type of retinal projection going on or those smart glasses (both may actually be more strenuous and unnatural than reading a book) or some kind of brain interface that can simply feed you the information but we're not there yet, give it about 5-10 years.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Ergonomics by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      Now, be nice. Your acidic remarks are unecessary and uncalled-for.

      We are currently one of the cheapest products in our marketplace. We do not sell hardware - and for people who really want touch screens, we recommend wall mounted all-in-ones that sit around U$900.

      Oh, and by the way, your ~0.5kg is false.

      iPad weight = 652 grams (here is a citation: http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/). That's the lighter version.
      iPad cover weight = 338 grams (citation: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/features/apple/3345046/best-cases-covers-for-new-ipad/)
      Apple make lighter cases, but the lightest I've seen still comes in at about 180 grams.
      Total weight 830 grams at best - though if you choose the 'recommended covers', it will be much closer to 1kg.

      Also, subby wasn't talking about reading books. He was talking about reading stapled printouts. There is a big weight difference. If you want an eBook reader for bedtime or on a plane - then, sure, grab one. Please do your research before posting snippy responses in /.

    4. Re:Ergonomics by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Actually when I road tested e-readers a few years back I found exactly this problem, nearly all of them ended up feeling too heavy after a while.

      It is not just the weight: it combines with the lack of heft so they are harder to hold. In the end the light, quilted back Kobo won the round (it didn't hurt that it has some of the least harmful DRM terms of all ereaders).

    5. Re:Ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >> Now, be nice. Your acidic remarks are unecessary and uncalled-for.

      That doesn't make them less correct.

      A 10.1" screen is plenty big to read from. Total nonsense that you have to hold them close to your face. Time for glasses.

      >> The alternative is to sit in a relaxed position and hold the device in your lap. Sounds good until you realise that your entire body is falling into a C shape (when seen from the side).

      In exactly the same way that a book would. I guess we'll all be crippled.

      >> We are currently one of the cheapest products in our marketplace. We do not sell hardware

      But you do sell software, and let me guess, it doesn't run on iOS or Android...

    6. Re:Ergonomics by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Tablets weigh about 500-700g, less for the 7".

      There is a solution to not distorting your posture, it's called using your muscles to act as the counter-balancing force. Then again, people with poor posture won't understand this. Then the key is movement. A tablet is wonderful to allow you to move and work. Dancing with a small counter-balance for a few hours should actually be beneficial ...if you have enough body awareness to understand counter-balancing :)

      The health of the body is predicated on movement. Fixed positions, whether deemed good or bad, should not be the focus. Always better to teach proper movement than to reduce the possibility of movement.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:Ergonomics by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, why not mount the tablet on a gooseneck arm with a magnetic mount, when not carrying? (That's what I do-- FWIW, Google Nexus 7 is my choice for most things, 10" for some, iPad, mostly too heavy... iPod touch mounted at 3" is pretty interesting as a monitor, but you're not going to annotate anything on it...)

    8. Re:Ergonomics by volmtech · · Score: 1

      It's called a table. Rest tablet on table with an adjustable stand to hold tablet at proper viewing angle. I have carpel tunnel damage to my hands and can't hold a book or a tablet for long. I sit in a comfortable chair and read for hours with no more effort then a slight flick with my finger to "turn" the pages.

  33. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    imho we ARE there.

    I initially tried out a Lenovo Thinkpad tablet but the n-trig based pen system wasn't responsive enough. I've since switched to the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 and it is AMAZING. My wife uses it to take notes, lecture from, annotate, email etc etc. Between S-Pen, Kno and other pen aware apps, this tablet fills all of our needs. She works in neuroscience for a university and in a lab and reads and annotates on many papers on her Note 10.1.

    I'd strongly recommend you check it out.

    Regards,
    Anonymous

    1. Re:Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the same boat and agree completely with the Galaxy Note 10.1 from the small amount of time I've played with one. I haven't bought one yet as I already have a 10" Android tablet that does what I need (Toshiba Thrive). Just waiting for Samsung to up the screen res and I'm there.

  34. Don't sit for long periods, that's the main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a LifeSpan treadmill desk, model tr1200dt. It solved my lower back problems. I walk at 1.2 miles per hour, and do so for at least 30 minutes at a time. I then undock my laptop, walk 3 feet to my normal desk, and dock it there. I work at the desk for an hour, but stand up at the 30 minute point for about 1 minute. Then I go back to the treadmill desk.

    Best money I ever spent, wish I had bought one years ago.

  35. Asking wrong question: treadmill workstations by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1
    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  36. Kindle (buttoned one) by VAElynx · · Score: 1

    I use Kindle to read papers in .pdf format. It works pretty damn well if you ask me.
    Sure, the font can be a bit small ,but all that means is *take off glasses*

  37. Nothing by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

    The IEEE standard for papers is still a two-column format, and the paper is only downloadable in PDF, so the first problem is that the paper is completely unreadable on anything other than your printed paper. PDF sucks, and therefore Kindle, ipad, etc. will all suck. This is totally fixable but I haven't seen an application yet that does it.

    Other problem is that I like to literally draw on papers as I read them... to check the math, to call attention to something, etc. Nothing I have seen has as simple and easy to use of an interface as a pen and paper. Relatedly, when I desire to draw up a schematic or other technical drawing documentation, I have found that trying to do it on a computer is so complicated that it ruins my train of thought. It's not hard, per se, but compared with a marker on a whiteboard it sucks. Take a cell-phone-camera picture afterwards and it's preserved and digitized for ever.

    Perhaps if Windows 8 takes off, and touch screens become the norm for all computers, and we can get rid of this ridiculous abstraction of a "mouse", we'll be able to accomplish more of these tasks on a computer. Still, for brainstorming or putting simple thoughts to paper, I don't know if I can see a future use case where the tablet takes over from pen and paper/whiteboard and marker. Unless doing it on a tablet adds something, it's just not worth it.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
  38. It's all ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an iPad, and when I read for any more than a few minutes, I have to keep it supported (on a desk/on my lap etc.). A bunch of stapled pieces of paper have the size of a letter/A4, weighs almost nothing, and has great resolution. Hard to beat.

  39. Galaxy Note 10.1 by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

    Virtually any tablet will satisfy your all your needs excpet for one: the need to annotate/take notes/ do anything written or drawn.

    You really have three options for something to satisfy this last need ( actually one option a active pen/digitizer, but the tablets that come with one come in three flavors ):

    1) Windows Slates. These are tablets made out of Windows laptops. Examples include: EEE Slate, Samsung Slate. Approximate price $1500.
    2)Windows Surface Pro. Approximate price $1000.
    3) Galaxy Note 10.1. Approximate price $500.

    Warning: don't be fooled into thinking you can add a pen later. For a decent digitizer you need some sort of tech built into the screen.

  40. Must it be a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At home I have my PC monitor on a swivel arm so I can turn it around and switch between chair and bed. Most of the time I'm on the bed in a Chac Mool-like position with the Bluetooth keyboard in my lap. I find this the most back-friendly position. I only get back into the chair when I have to type fast and with the extended keyboard. A netbook or ultrabook can also be used it in that position but it gets a little uncomfortable.

    Related question: Why do we still have offices when the data are online and everything is mobile? For better supervision? Or for the water cooler talks? My uneducated guess is that people could be more productive if they weren't forced to work in an office, but also less controllable.

  41. One Cheap Enough to run a beowful cluster on by hoolaparara · · Score: 1

    Or at least afford one each for the minimum number of pages you'll want open, all run from the same account at the same time!

  42. calibre and the tablet or e-reader of your choice. by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    There is no doubt that e-readers have made carrying large quantities of documentation around with you much, MUCH easier. What is tougher to do is manage your library. Fortunately, someone has already made tremendous strides to resolve that issue.

    calibre provides a great way to organize your library of e-books and online periodicals in conjunction with the tablet or e-reader of your choice. The website has a highlights video which does a good job of covering what calibre is capable of.
    At this point, calibre provides automatic download scheduling for almost 1,400 online magazines. More are added by users of calibre all the time. A sampling that might be of interest to academics include "Journal of Hospital Medicine", "Journal of Nephrology", "Microwaves and RF", "Scientific American", etc.

    Once you've added a book (or collection of books) to your library, calibre provides plenty of tools to categorize it by subject, author, publisher, and just about anything else you care to name.

    So, once you've got your papers and periodicals organized in calibre, pulling them into your e-reader is simply a matter of plugging into a USB port on your desktop or laptop. If you want to grab something when you're away from your desk, there's a Web front end that's pretty serviceable, too.

    calibre is licensed under GPLv3 and is supported under MS Windows, OS/X, and Linux. There's even a portable version for loading on a USB stick to make your library truly portable. :-)

    BTW, the Grand Tour video was created when the current version of calibre was 0.8.0. Kovid Goyal has been conscientously providing updates every Friday for as long as I've been using his app. The current version is 0.9.8. I think he went from 0.8.0 to 0.8.78 before making the leap to 0.9.0. :-)

    As to which e-reader to use? There are a huge number of tablets and dedicated devices out there these days, although even the dedicated ones have all pretty much morphed into tablets. My personal favorite is the Nook Color but I've found that it's underpowered to handle large PDFs with a lot of graphics. However, calibre provides a pretty decent conversion utility for PDF to EPUB. The Nook does a much better job of managing memory for the EPUB format, so the large PDFs aren't even that big a deal for me.

  43. Android + RepliGO Reader by melstav · · Score: 0

    I see that several people have suggested the iPad, but I'm astonished that I'm the first to suggest RepliGo Reader. It's pretty damn awesome.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guF533z4bdM

    I highly recommend watching the demo video

    1. Re:Android + RepliGO Reader by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guF533z4bdM

      What the hell does a Marlin Fish Board have to do with anything. Come to think of it: WTF is a marlin Fish Board.

    2. Re:Android + RepliGO Reader by melstav · · Score: 1
      Goddamnit.

      Paste buffer fail.
      THIS is the link I thought I was posting -- https://play.google.com/store/search?q=repligo+reader&c=apps

      Sorry, all.

    3. Re:Android + RepliGO Reader by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      You should use Windows. One clipboard, Ctrl C/Ctrl V. On a Freetard OS things become much more confusing so you end up cut and pasting your filthy degenerate brony sex toys like this Marlin Fish Suit into your work emails or slashdot posts and that means a one way to trip to the glue factory.

      And you can catch brony from Freetard OSs. E.g. look

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=brony+linux

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  44. Perhaps large e-ink with wacom is not to far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least where there are people still innovating instead of just following the adventures of the vocal iSheep who follow nothing but the iPad, iCloud and iAnyoldthing devices.

    Here is an example of what is happening on the other side of the pond and is very interesting. I am a classical guitarist and putting one of these puppies on my music stand would be really nice for easily reading music pdfs that I and others are capable of creating.

    I am sure they would be much more expensive than a kobo or a kindle but they could be absolutely killer for musicians or for what this post is all about because of Wacom capabilities on e-ink. HEY SLASHDOT do stuff on more than what is only happening in the USA again get those iBlinders off! iAm afraid iWe are missing the forest for the trees in North America because of the iFixation and down right self serving blinded iSheep posting constantly everywhere on tech sites.

  45. requirements list for such a tablet by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    A4 size
    at least 150dpi
    daylight readable
    a day or more battery life
    robust but light
    able to take annotations
    minimal DRM sillyness
    quick page turns

    1. Re:requirements list for such a tablet by allo · · Score: 1

      now choose at most 3 of there properties. Then you may get good suggestions for a device.

  46. Surface for sure. by elabs · · Score: 1

    If you're used to the larger format of a newspaper or a 8.5x11 (or A4) report then the Surface is the right tablet for you. The Kindle and Nook are light but way too small for technical reading. Diagrams, illustrations and charts that fit well in a printed report would look miniscule on those readers. Even the iPad would be too small. Only the Surface is large enough to see the detail you need.

  47. Re:Perhaps large e-ink with wacom is not to far of by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

    Wha?? To me it's not even clear that this thing comes with an active digitizer. If it does then comparing stats to the Galaxy Note 10.1 which definitely comes with a digitizer it is woefully short with only a slightly smaller price tag. If Christmas prices hang around, it will actually be more expensive.

    If you really really want eink at the cost of a lot of tablet functionality then this is the tablet for you. Otherwise...

  48. E-Ink + OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we can somehow combine the magic of E-Ink with the thinness of OLED technologies, I believe we would have something.

  49. pocketbook pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poketbook Pro - 10 inch e-paper screen. Built-in wacom tablet for annotations. Export your marked up pdf to a new pdf with annotations to transfer it to other devices.

    This is Ukrainian (supports most languages including English). It is hard to get in the States. Amazon had them for a while, but no longer. I understand they are pretty widely available in Europe.

    I don't have one, but I want one.

  50. Laptop by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Why not use a laptop, then you can sit back with your feet up on your desk? That's how I used to work in a development environment - I had a couple of multiprocessor Pentium Pros under my desk for running builds, but any coding, reading, or writing documentation was done on my laptop, sitting back comfortably with my laptop on my lap, then I'd check in the code, and move my build and SQL scripts over as needed.

    Unprofessional? Perhaps, if you're a client-facing sales "engineer" or technical account manager, but not compared to engineers shooting nerf guns or having wadded-paper fights. :-)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. A laptop on my lap and an easy chair. Also, I use Zotero (www.zotero.org) which integrates with msword to automate citations. I can make annotations with foxit pdf reader, but the big convenience is making notes in Zotero to find what I need later.

      Also, the pdf files render properly on my laptop (not on my kindle, its a terrible reader and way too small) , the screen is bigger and easier to read, moving about in the file is simple with the arrow keys and if I lean back and if the font is to small, alt-shift-+/=.

  51. Papers for ipad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed none of the researchers mentioned Papers for ipad (that's the name by mekentosj). A bit pricey but there is a mac/pc/ios version. It will automatically add metadata and can sync.. combined with dropbox it works well. Also proviedes note taking and highlighting among many other features.

    I recently tried Sente but kept crashing on mountain lion so gave up. Papers really helped keep my large research library somewhat sane. You can also export to Endnote when you want to write a paper of your own.

    1. Re:Papers for ipad? by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      Your comment prompts me to take another look. I'd looked at Papers, Sente and one other (I can't remember) for managing academic documents — thousands of them — but none worked very well for me. I wanted to have the software on multiple devices, and to be able to keep them in sync pretty effortlessly but without using a third party server. I wanted to be able to access the documents on my iPad, mark them up and have them synced back. I wanted the whole lot to be easily exportable to some common format, so that, if I didn't want to stick with the software forever, I could move easily.

      I ended up with a directory hierarchy and owncloud, but I'll take another look, in case things have come on.

  52. Simple: iPad, Goodreader and Dropbox with stylus by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    I was not and am not an Apple Fanboy.

    However, after an exhaustive search I've settled on:

    iPad 2 WiFi 16 GB (cheapest available -- around $370 at Fry's)
    Goodreader (Around $5 -- most definitely worth it)
    Dropbox
    Adonit Jot stylus (get the $30 version -- you don't need the pressure sensitive BlueTooth version for this). Do NOT get anything cheaper -- you can't write on the margins with your fingers or with cheaper styli.

    I sync various folders of papers in dropbox, annotate them (usually with Dropbox and the stylus), and sync the back to my PC for printing and viewing with annotations.

    I thought this would be a poor substitute, but it has the advantage over paper that you can zoom in on the figures.

    The only thing I miss about paper is tearing a paper apart and looking at the references at the same time as the content as I read it. I usually have my laptop open for this purpose (opened to the end of the same paper) and to perform any fast googling necessary for comprehension of the paper.

  53. Re:Perhaps large e-ink with wacom is not to far of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wha?? To me it's not even clear that this thing comes with an active digitizer. If it does then comparing stats to the Galaxy Note 10.1 which definitely comes with a digitizer it is woefully short with only a slightly smaller price tag. If Christmas prices hang around, it will actually be more expensive.

    If you really really want eink at the cost of a lot of tablet functionality then this is the tablet for you. Otherwise...

    Spent considerable time replying to your post so that others may perhaps see the logic of what I see, not to flame anyone. Hopefully someone will actually read this as it is how I perceive the discouraging state of high tech devices and literacy in general.

    I do see a light at the end of the tunnel caused by the limited functionality of all in one products that pervades the current western world of high tech and manufactures sensibilities.

    With e-ink devices it will come down in production costs and simplicity of design and use with a device that only does one thing and that is display text in PDF format or other e-ink active display formats. Otherwise e-readers would not be outselling tablets 2-1 the way they are...different market different needs.

    NOT everyone in the world uses just iPads and tablets, in fact some people find them down right useless for reading, my wife has both and never uses the iPad for e-reading. But goes nowhere for any length of time without her Kobo.

    Going on the assumption that multipurpose consumer stuff is right for all people is just plane wrong.

    Large e-ink readers with Wacom pen annotation capabilities will be cheaper if it does not connect to the net, no wifi to run down the battery and add cost, therefore boots almost instantly from cold, loads stuff through usb or card, does not rely upon the CLOUD, and is really portable.

    The Wacom part is not even really that important in my case. I simply desire a decent size pdf capable e-ink device for my music stand. A device which currently does not exist.

    No need whatsoever for expensive color gorilla glass amoled or retina displays (whatever the hell that is), as a matt finish screen with low level back lighting like the Kobo glo is ideal in low light situations like the stage and is far superior to read from than any glossy screen that reflects light. This also means no expensive gpu with 3d and 2d acceleration.

    Need more reasons for this device, no facebook, no netflix, no poorly written xml interfaces to web applications, no problems with malware, no camera to add cost.

    There is a huge unfilled market for specialized professional and student devices created from the best parts of a new technology.

    And why even though they might be slightly more expensive at first, because of their need to be selectively marketed, could be extremely attractive to those who really would benefit from them.

    Specialized devices for specialized purposes is the future. The current craze for all in one wonder devices like the iPad everything is just a passing fad that unfortunately does not do justice to what is really possible with things like e-ink and specialized tablet devices.

    Trying to shoehorn Android, Window RT, and the iPads capabilities into the specialized device market is not going to cut it. In fact the all in wonder toys that are currently everywhere will almost do everything we speak of right now, but not one thing really well like displaying 8 1/2x 11 complicated sheet music, complicated cad diagrams, and huge amounts of text exactly the way only a real book easily can.

    After all some of us do still actually read stuff other than colour comic books, web pages, tweets or the latest posts to a facebook page!

    I truly hope that e-ink technology will eventually help replace the need for paper documents in the real world where people do study, work and teach literacy, mathematics, geometry, physics, all the other scientific arts.... and for me musical literacy.

    By putting e-ink text books on the

  54. Re:Simple: iPad, Goodreader and Dropbox with stylu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you read anything with formulas or technical diagrams? If you do, get an Ipad 3 or 4, the better screen resolution really makes a difference.

  55. http://www.asus.com/Eee/Eee_Note/Eee_Note_EA800/#A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been looking at this.

  56. Asus EP121 and windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The asus EP121 came out before windows 8, so it's not exactly optimized for it, but it does a wonderful job with it. Using onenote with ink to text for meetings and such it's awesome. Then the free pdf utility that includes markup is terrific. The wacom stylus is spot on a easy to use like a real pen on paper. The larger 12.1" display is more like a piece of paper and not the 13:9 display that microsoft dictates for the metro desktop. It's a little bigger and bulkier, but still quite nice.

  57. Mixed bag by Grismar · · Score: 1

    I like having the tablet on hand, since it is less intrusive in a meeting and in some cases more practical than a laptop. But the weight of all decent tablets is still too much to really recommend it for every case, even if you don't mind spending extra on an iPad. And the speed and software on eBook readers is still not quite there yet to recommend those at all, in my opinion. In terms of software I like Mantano Reader for Android (using it on a Motorola Xoom, which is nice, but heavy). But perhaps my main issue with any of these options is still the limited typing speed for annotations and notes. Perhaps Microsoft will manage to surprise us with something in the way of actual usable speech recognition on Surface?..

  58. Good example of what slashdot is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, every time I think slashdot is sliding downhill, there's the occasional rewarding article like this one that contains many useful comments from ordinary users doing similar sorts of things to what I'm doing, or wondering about similar questions. An experienced and opinionated bunch, you are. And that's a good thing.

    Thanks, slashdot community.

  59. Everyone is recommending the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own an iPad 3 too, and have tried to use it as a book reader, but I gave up soon - TOO HEAVY. My hand hurts.

    The iPad weighs 650 g and a normal book is under 300g, so the iPad is like a 800 page book.

  60. good screens are the way to go by davecb · · Score: 1

    You're seeing quality-of-print issues: my typesetter friends sensitized me to things you can't see consciously affecting the reading experience. This, in part, motivates higher-quality displays like the retina, and subtle things like designing/adjusting the fonts for particular bit-densities in e-ink. Only a small amount is measurable without brain imaging (:-)). The easily measurable part is reading speed: 30% slower on a good digital screen than on analog paper.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:good screens are the way to go by lucm · · Score: 1

      Retina or no retina does not change the fact that high-frequency refresh is tiresome for the eyes and make long reading sessions unpleasant - it does not matter if you read slightly slower or faster if you give up after 15 minutes. There is no refresh with e-ink (except when flipping the page) hence it is as pleasant to read as actual paper. So I guess my hope is that they will come up with higher quality e-ink.

      Meanwhile being able to change the font size, paper color, text density, etc. on the Kindle turns out to be pretty convenient. I've been using the device for a while and I found out that I sometimes enjoy having more or less text on the page (usually more text for fiction and less for non-fiction). But yeah, diagrams and images are an eyesore and I usually just ignore them.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:good screens are the way to go by davecb · · Score: 1

      Indeed: I can easily notice anything up to about 40 CPS refresh (my grandma had 40 cycle power when I was a kid). I don't "see" anything past 60 CPS, but my eyes do, and get tired.

      Interestingly, my newer flatscreens seem better than my old CRT, which had been distinctly better than my old flatties.

      It will be interesting to see if this is a measurable effect: it was initially hard to come up with anything other than anecdotal evidence of differing qualities...

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  61. Large format color e-ink by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is still needed as everything else is still a compromise for 'paper replacement'.

    And yes, i know there s ONE vendor out there that is doing it ( Hanvon ) but we need it to be mainstream.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  62. Doesn't matter what technology you have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you spend hours sitting while using it. Try working while standing up, for at least half of the day, and your back problems will likely go away. Try Googling "stand up desk", and build a makeshift one as a trial. Only problem is that it takes away the excuse to buy a new piece of technological kit.

  63. edit the PDF to have 23+ pt font-size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    edit the PDF to have 23+ pt font-size...
    and your PDF becomes Kindle-readable
    ( I'm doing that to a bunch of web-pages I'm archiving for off-line use,
    so I'll have something worth reading, when I move back to the bush for a year
    save the page in Firefox, open the page in OpenOffice Writer,
    select ALL, change font to 23pt or more, export to PDF, and voila!
    Kindle-usable PDFs! : )

    The Problem(tm), is that Kindle's notation interface is d-e-a-d-s-l-o-w-w-w...
    due to the eInk screen.

    I think the Galaxy Note 10 recommendations are probably the ones on target...

  64. Why a tablet at all? by dalroth5 · · Score: 2

    Why a tablet? Do you really want to spend all day holding the damned thing? Forget that.
    Your problem is being hunched over the keyboard & mouse.
    Your solution is to buy an Alphagrip:

    http://http//www.alphagrips.com/

    Then you can lift your screen to eye level, enlarge the fonts, and finally lean back just like in the old days, touch-typing away in full ergonomic comfort, just like I am now. I would _never_ go back to a crappy old qwerty board mate. Hell, just watch one of the typing demos and you'll get it:

    http://www.alphagrips.com/typingdemo.html

    No, I don't work for them, I just love the device. Oh, and comfort, I like that too.

    Smile, breathe, and go slowly.

    S

    --
    "We reject kings, presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code." Dave Clark, IETF
  65. What I'm waiting for... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... is a tablet that let's me read PDFs in the same size as the 8.2x11 output I would normally read after it was printed. I would really love a tablet -- or a generic e-book reader -- with a bunch of storage to allow me to carry around all of the PDFs of manuals that I might need when working on a problem at a customer site without having to download something from the web/cloud (which might not be available after all; that's why I'm on-site: trying to fix a problem that might have taken the network down). Shrinking the page down to fit a 10-inch screen doesn't hack it. Making me scroll a viewing window around to view the page especially doesn't hack it. I don't need/want a built-in camera (which frankly can't even begin to compete with my DSLR with interchangeable lens) , photo editing, or a bunch of games, etc. Make the darned screen bigger!

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  66. I just discovered a 22" tablet (: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  67. for android: ezPDF reader by tulimulta · · Score: 1

    I've used ezPDF reader with my Transformer Prime tablet for half a year now. It does the same tricks as iAnnotate for iPads. I use Zotero for document management (with the ZotFlie add-on), and Dropbox to sync the annotated PDFs between the tablet and my other computers. Works great. No going back to paper!

  68. Asus Transformer-what surface is copying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work in an I.T. procurement department, we purchased and tested the first round of quality android tablets and the iPad 2 (they came out about the same time). The Asus Transformer is still far and away the best for productivity. There isn't a comparison. Windows 8 surface tablets are directly copying the success of this tablet because they recognize it's potential for the work place. Detach the screen when you want to read, even with the dock it's small and light, but still large enough to have a comfortable keyboard even for large hands. Plug it in to the dock when you need to type anything of significant length, in order to charge (i havent had to tether my tablet to a wall in the two years I've had it), or if you need a USB port (the tablet itself also has a microSD). The quality of work apps in the android store is really incredible. There really isn't any there tablet out there that compares, even the $1150 (twice the cost of the latest 5 core transformer) surface tablet has half of it's storage taken up by bloatware, hasn't had as much time to optimize it's software for touchscreen, and doesn't allow external storage. The latest model of the transformer also supports the sync and remote wipe options required by many businesses.

  69. I probably shouldn't feed the trolls.. by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

    You like Apple and nice, clean UI's? I hate to break it to you, but memorizing 10 gestures and multi-key operations (e.g. option+click) is about as nice and clean as my compiz install that used no program menus nor icons. Apple gives me one button. I pressed on an iPhone because I wanted a menu, then the program that someone opened for me was gone. They wanted me to press imaginary buttons or play Pictionary to get where I wanted. HOW IS THAT CLEAN??!!! Apple either has the absolutely least intuitive UI I've ever seen, or I'm retarded to think a button on my UI should operate the running program. If you had listed something like the quality hardware, variety of shortcuts, consistent platform or the nice workflow (I suppose all the fanboys like it), then I could accept that or even agree with you.

    Good open source has some of the best UI I've seen: Google Chrome is a release of the open source Chromium browser vs Safari looking like my browser from 2002 and Microsoft Internet Explorer being IE, OpenOffice had better menu arrangements than MS Office (pre-2007, who put format actions in multiple menus. haven't used newer versions much), the GIMP menu arrangment is easier to learn than Photoshop (counter complaints are from people already used to Photoshop), and the Pidgin (formerly GTK AIM, GAIM, Gaim, and gaim through various trademark issues and AOL bullying) UI beat the pants off of the standard AIM messenger (enough to be featured in Forbes). Ubuntu has some of the simplest & best software install/management software I've seen (unless clicking a single alert icon to update everything is too technical for you), where Microsoft has nothing I've seen. I think I heard Apple has something, but I don't expect it to be as flexible in adding 3rd party sources.

    Before you get too out of sorts defending the UI on Reeder (a Google Reader client), you should know I've seen all of those UI elements in open source projects that predate Google Reader itself. Since you didn't say what project you're accusing of ripping off a UI and a quick search didn't reveal Reeder's age, how do you know Reeder didn't steal the exact UI from the other software? Based on the information you provided, you leave me with thinking you always assume the software was built in the order you find out about it, but I assume there's just some information missing.

    I'm sick of snotty Apple fans who defend their brand and bash others without real information. As I've grown up, I've realized that every proprietary platform will burn me unless I keep giving them money over and over again for something I've already bought.

  70. Motion LE 1600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still waiting on something better than my motion LE 1600. 12.2 inch screen. (About 7.5x10 inches.) I can read PDFs on it just fine. The trick to posture: read while laying on the couch. zZz.