More to the point, if you don't want a working public school system and think that education is something the parents have to afford and not something a child is entitled to, don't act astonished, if all you get is a dysfunctional public school system.
But if it's your ISP who does the hiding routinely and you have to pay extra to get clear text, which in turn means that everyone is doing it, what probable cause is it then?
It doesn't? Hum. I must have dreamed that Exodus 2, Chapter 21-23 was in that book. And Jeremy 14 probably wasn't there either. Judges 19? Never seen that one. 1. Timothy? Of course not!
An self-employed accountant has to worry about his client to pay for his work. What do you think why in countries with a failed government people who can afford it start to hire gunmen? They just replace the governmental authority with their own, and instead of paying taxes they are paying gunmen. The big advantages of a government compared to a bunch of infighting gangs of different warlords are that it is cheaper, because more people share the burden to finance it, it is more predictable and creates a more stable environment to enable you to mind your own business. And if the government is democratically elected, you can even influence what direction your goverment is heading to, and relatively effortless work to replace a government you don't like with one you like better. If you are starving your government to death, you have to pay a militia to keep the peace and to uphold whatever pervertion of the law is in fashion. And either you have to pay the militia to work for your interest or to pay it to get it off your back or you have to join the militia - it just depends on the amount of pay you are able to afford which role you get. If you prefer the latter model of a society, feel free to work to abandon the government.
MacGyver was the epitome of how technology does not work (and the political background to the stories was purely fairytale with no connection to reality).
No, the government is one of the methods to do politics, which is understood as "trying to influence society en large or en detail to further your interests". And one of the biggest interests of an employee is to get paid, otherwise an employee would not agree to an employment contract anyway.
Because the government created a legal framework and will protect your right to get a fair wage for your work, it will also take some of your wage as a compensation for its work.
Feel free to abolish all government and then try make a decent living from being employed!
Conservativism today means: I take any govermental service as long as my boss doesn't have to pay taxes. It's the completely fucked up idea that one has to protect the rich and the powerful, because one could one day be rich and powerful too, and then one might not like to pay taxes. But the idea that one day one could be poor and unable to help oneself gets refused because if that is something that only happens to other people.
I know the problem, I also own a WGR614... (which sits in a corner collecting dust, because I replaced it with a Linksys several years ago.) But as long as you get new supported devices for less than US$25, it's not so much of an issue.
At least a good amount of them can be refitted for IPv6 due to installing OpenWRT or DD-WRT or any of the other distributions out there. Maybe it's a business opportunity, flashing home routers to use one of those and reconfigure them to the initial settings afterwards?
No, it is not. Both sequences, 0, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999... and 1, 1.0, 1.00, 1.00, 1.000 approach to the same number: 1.
And because both are Cauchy sequences, and both converge to the same limit, the axioms of the Real Numbers defines the limits of both sequences as being equal. What mathematicians did was to axiomatically declare 0.999999... and 1 being the same. There is not much to understand about it. It's The Axiom.
I completely disagree with you on that. A product designed by an engineer is sold to a layman, who is by definition not able to assess the inherent dangers of its use. If he was, he wouldn't need the service of an engineer to design the product in the first place. A layman is not an engineer. An engineer thus has either to transfer all the knowledge necessary to operate the product safely to the customer, or to make its use not dangerous, even the use the product was not originally intended for. And of course this can be controlled and if not correctly done, being sanctioned.
The individuals targeted were informed and given an opportunity to object only after Twitter complained. The original subpoena was to be kept secret to everyone.
That's not a copyright, that's probably a "community design", which was introduced into European law and came into effect on Apr 1 2003. It's protection term is 25 years from the day of registration, if the yearly maintenance fee is paid. Unregistered designs are protected for three years.
We could even go with the fashion industry's concept, which doesn't have any copyright protection at all. And as we know, fashion designers are notoriously poor, don't have a chance to earn a decent living, and we are forced to wear the same design for dozens of years because no one has any incentive to create new clothes designs. Or we could be the food industry, where recipes aren't protected by anything, not even trademarks (the trademarks itself are protected though). And as we know, no one ever got rich from inventing any new recipes.
More to the point, if you don't want a working public school system and think that education is something the parents have to afford and not something a child is entitled to, don't act astonished, if all you get is a dysfunctional public school system.
I wonder why the normal european TDI is rated at around 40-43% then. Probably Europa violates the laws of Thermodynamics.
But if it's your ISP who does the hiding routinely and you have to pay extra to get clear text, which in turn means that everyone is doing it, what probable cause is it then?
It doesn't? Hum. I must have dreamed that Exodus 2, Chapter 21-23 was in that book. And Jeremy 14 probably wasn't there either. Judges 19? Never seen that one. 1. Timothy? Of course not!
An self-employed accountant has to worry about his client to pay for his work. What do you think why in countries with a failed government people who can afford it start to hire gunmen? They just replace the governmental authority with their own, and instead of paying taxes they are paying gunmen.
The big advantages of a government compared to a bunch of infighting gangs of different warlords are that it is cheaper, because more people share the burden to finance it, it is more predictable and creates a more stable environment to enable you to mind your own business. And if the government is democratically elected, you can even influence what direction your goverment is heading to, and relatively effortless work to replace a government you don't like with one you like better.
If you are starving your government to death, you have to pay a militia to keep the peace and to uphold whatever pervertion of the law is in fashion. And either you have to pay the militia to work for your interest or to pay it to get it off your back or you have to join the militia - it just depends on the amount of pay you are able to afford which role you get.
If you prefer the latter model of a society, feel free to work to abandon the government.
The problem is, engineering isn't like this either. As evidence, I offer you....
Slashdot.
Slashdot is not here to work to a solution to a given problem.
That's probably why the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany is a quantum chemist.
MacGyver was the epitome of how technology does not work (and the political background to the stories was purely fairytale with no connection to reality).
You mean, they are no longer using tanks to roll down protests at the Tianman Square?
In fact, the revolutionary wave in Eastern Europe of the 1989 and 1990 was mainly carried by engineers and artists, a very unique coalition.
No, the government is one of the methods to do politics, which is understood as "trying to influence society en large or en detail to further your interests". And one of the biggest interests of an employee is to get paid, otherwise an employee would not agree to an employment contract anyway.
Because the government created a legal framework and will protect your right to get a fair wage for your work, it will also take some of your wage as a compensation for its work.
Feel free to abolish all government and then try make a decent living from being employed!
Conservativism today means: I take any govermental service as long as my boss doesn't have to pay taxes.
It's the completely fucked up idea that one has to protect the rich and the powerful, because one could one day be rich and powerful too, and then one might not like to pay taxes. But the idea that one day one could be poor and unable to help oneself gets refused because if that is something that only happens to other people.
I know the problem, I also own a WGR614... (which sits in a corner collecting dust, because I replaced it with a Linksys several years ago.)
But as long as you get new supported devices for less than US$25, it's not so much of an issue.
That's one of the wonderful results of all those Instant-On-services.
Never in history have so many people written so much and read that many lines of text on a regular base. Which is a good sign.
If he planned to attack someone on a shooting range, he would have tried it in a sniper fashion, hiding someplace and aiming at his targets.
At least a good amount of them can be refitted for IPv6 due to installing OpenWRT or DD-WRT or any of the other distributions out there. Maybe it's a business opportunity, flashing home routers to use one of those and reconfigure them to the initial settings afterwards?
No, it is not. Both sequences, 0, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999... and 1, 1.0, 1.00, 1.00, 1.000 approach to the same number: 1.
And because both are Cauchy sequences, and both converge to the same limit, the axioms of the Real Numbers defines the limits of both sequences as being equal.
What mathematicians did was to axiomatically declare 0.999999... and 1 being the same. There is not much to understand about it. It's The Axiom.
I completely disagree with you on that.
A product designed by an engineer is sold to a layman, who is by definition not able to assess the inherent dangers of its use. If he was, he wouldn't need the service of an engineer to design the product in the first place. A layman is not an engineer. An engineer thus has either to transfer all the knowledge necessary to operate the product safely to the customer, or to make its use not dangerous, even the use the product was not originally intended for. And of course this can be controlled and if not correctly done, being sanctioned.
The individuals targeted were informed and given an opportunity to object only after Twitter complained.
The original subpoena was to be kept secret to everyone.
And even with internal use you have to at least be able to provide the users within your organisation with the source code.
The nutjob was not killed, and not even arrested with the help of a gun.
I was born in 1970, and I had both, measles and mumps.
That's not a copyright, that's probably a "community design", which was introduced into European law and came into effect on Apr 1 2003. It's protection term is 25 years from the day of registration, if the yearly maintenance fee is paid. Unregistered designs are protected for three years.
We could even go with the fashion industry's concept, which doesn't have any copyright protection at all. And as we know, fashion designers are notoriously poor, don't have a chance to earn a decent living, and we are forced to wear the same design for dozens of years because no one has any incentive to create new clothes designs.
Or we could be the food industry, where recipes aren't protected by anything, not even trademarks (the trademarks itself are protected though). And as we know, no one ever got rich from inventing any new recipes.
Now it is just a trademark of the Canadian Thompson group.