One supposes he meant "private citizen" when he said "person".
And if that holds up on appeal, you can bet there will be a scramble to change it.
This was a hearing in the federal court there is no further avenue of appeal.
The only higher body is the high court which is mainly concerned with constitutional law etc which this case has no avenue too.
The good guys have won this battle but the war goes on.
One supposes he meant "private citizen" when he said "person".
And if that holds up on appeal, you can bet there will be a scramble to change it.
This was a hearing in the federal court there is no further avenue of appeal. The only higher body is the high court which is mainly concerned with constitutional law etc which this case has no avenue too. The good guys have won this battle but the war goes on.