No, tenets cannot sue. Anything. Ever.
tenet:
noun
1.
a principle or belief, esp. one of the main principles of a religion or philosophy.
A tenant, however, can.
As opposed to tenant:
noun
1.
a person who occupies land or property rented from a landlord.
You don't think SCOTUS should be allowed to hear a case rooted in the 4th Amendment to the Constitution?
If they aren't there to rule on cases relating to the Constitution, what, exactly do you think is the role of the Supreme Court?
I'm all for States Rights, but they specifically do not include the ability to nullify to contradict portions of the Constitution.
Slashdot Mirror
No, tenets cannot sue. Anything. Ever. tenet: noun 1. a principle or belief, esp. one of the main principles of a religion or philosophy. A tenant, however, can. As opposed to tenant: noun 1. a person who occupies land or property rented from a landlord.
You don't think SCOTUS should be allowed to hear a case rooted in the 4th Amendment to the Constitution? If they aren't there to rule on cases relating to the Constitution, what, exactly do you think is the role of the Supreme Court? I'm all for States Rights, but they specifically do not include the ability to nullify to contradict portions of the Constitution.
Are you calling your great uncle a liar?
FTA: "The IDC and Gartner PC sales figures do not include tablets." Not according to the article.