Slashdot Mirror


Site Offers History of Torrent Downloads By IP

tsu doh nimh writes "You may have never heard of youhavedownloaded.com, but if you recently grabbed movies, music or software from online file-trading networks, chances are decent that the site has heard of you. In fact, you may find that the titles you downloaded are now listed and publicly searchable at the site, indexed by your Internet address. So far, youhavedownloaded.com has recorded more than 50 million unique Internet addresses belonging to file-sharing users. The site is searchable by file name and by Internet address. When you visit, it automatically checks and lets you know if your Internet address is in the database."

340 comments

  1. Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Beware all you clickers!

    1. Re:Honeypot? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking...

    2. Re:Honeypot? by marcosdumay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was thinking on some sort of phishing scam...
      Honeypot for catching what? Visiting such a site is not evidence of piracy.

    3. Re:Honeypot? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Honey what?

    4. Re:Honeypot? by lorenlal · · Score: 4, Funny

      That site doesn't care...

    5. Re:Honeypot? by Vanderhoth · · Score: 2

      Whether they are recording file-share IPs from torrent downloads or not would be beside the point. The people who are visiting this site would be people who do file-share and my be concerned they'll be sued.

      Visiting the site will confirm they're on the list and they'll be "scared straight".

    6. Re:Honeypot? by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They don't need evidence they just have send a letter to your ISP saying you are a pirate.

    7. Re:Honeypot? by MichaelKristopeit400 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      i don't "do file-share"... i visited the site... my current dynamically assigned IP wasn't on the list.

      you're an idiot.

    8. Re:Honeypot? by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I visited site out of curiosity. I don't pirate, yet they say I downloaded a bunch of shows (CSI Miami? Please, who watches that? Well, not me.) I am starting to think that site is not at all legit.

    9. Re:Honeypot? by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      If you are dynamic IP, that is why. In addition, if you are running windows, that would expain it. IOW, you have been UPLOADING, but without your knowledge.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:Honeypot? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Talk for your country. I live in one where "innocent until proven guilty" still means something.

      But we're working on that...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Honeypot? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it didn't say anything for me, it should have. though my ip changes semi-frequently.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:Honeypot? by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not every Win PC (like my gaming rig for example) is automatically compromised and infected with bots. While it is possible, I see it as rather unlikely, since I have enough expertise to prevent anything that is not specifically target at me.

      Much more reasonable assumption is that a) I didn't notice recent IP shuffle b) Database is randomly generated c) Database is not randomly generated, but might as well be due to methodology flaws.

    13. Re:Honeypot? by PNutts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are dynamic IP, that is why. In addition,

      There. Fixed that for ya.

    14. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works!! It found all my gay porn I downloaded!! LoL!!!!

    15. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you visit the link when it's very popular like when
      it's a story on /. or say krebsonsecurity.com

      It's a news bit, everybody want so see the site. It is a tad
      odd that neither site links directly to it.

      I've viewed a lot of material that could be seen
      as objectionable linking to it through /. I feel it's safer
      that way and it is, your just one of many sheep at the time.

    16. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Visit the site from a Tor address and see what pops up. ;)

    17. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, windows is targeted because it is such an easy target. Worse, the users all assume that they are experts and KNOW that they could not be infected, but the system next to them might be or likely is.

      Wow, Dude, who does that sound like?

    18. Re:Honeypot? by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

      It's likely an IP shuffle. The site just crawls the same way that the RIAA/MPAA has in the past; it's a non-serious project by some guys with a decent sense of humor. (Okay, it's not that good, but the point is they mean to be funny).

    19. Re:Honeypot? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      have enough expertise to prevent anything that is not specifically target at me

      Much more reasonable assumption is that a) I didn't notice recent IP shuffle

      See I don't buy it. If you had enough expertise to prevent *anything* that is not specifically targeted at you, an extraordinary claim! Then at the very least you would have logs and the ability to search them easily enough that you'd have checked and been aware of that ip shuffle before posting.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    20. Re:Honeypot? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Eastern Europe somewhere? It certainly isn't here in the US.

    21. Re:Honeypot? by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a dynamic IP (or use windows, heh). It still listed some crap I've never heard of (although 1 entry was correct, only 1). I know my wife didn't download them because she doesn't know even know what torrents are. I doubt any of my small handful of neighbours hacked my wpa2 just so they could download some self-motivation crap (it's not even tony robbins!). There seems to be more flaws with their data collection process than just the dynamic IP issue.

    22. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it looks like i'm in the clear! > 127.0.0.1 > Well, this IP in the clear. But look what others do

    23. Re:Honeypot? by hedwards · · Score: 2

      It depends on your set up. I typically have the same IP address for long periods of time because the ISP doesn't reassign them unless you've gone offline for a period of time. If I turned it off and back on I might get a new IP, but as long as the connection is there consistently they don't bother handing out a new IP.

      When I checked the site it didn't have any information at all.

    24. Re:Honeypot? by smi.james.th · · Score: 2

      I've personally never bothered to check how long I have the same IP, but the router / modem which my ISP gave me as part of the bundle is quite crappy, so I need to reset it at least every couple of days. I checked on the list and nothing there matched what I'd actually been downloading.

      FWIW, for all those people saying "I don't download," torrents don't ONLY have "illegal" stuff. There's a lot of Creative Commons music available on torrent, (Jamendo for example) and most Linux distros distribute their isos with torrents as well as regular downloads. As I mentioned though, this website had a long list of stuff downloaded by this IP, but none of it was mine.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    25. Re:Honeypot? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      I also visited the site, out of a particular curiosity. It said my permanent IP address was not in their database.

      I'm not sure how to interpret this - I have used torrents, but only for Linux ISOs (a few flavors of Ubuntu and PCLinuxOS). However, the site does not appear to restrict itself to torrents of questionable legality, but apparently encompasses all file sharing, including the legal sharing of GPL and CC works. If you enter "Ubuntu" in their search box, it will return a number of ISO links along with links to videos, books, etc.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    26. Re:Honeypot? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I visited site out of curiosity. I don't pirate, yet they say I downloaded a bunch of shows (CSI Miami? Please, who watches that? Well, not me.)
      I am starting to think that site is not at all legit.

      Do you have an unprotected (or minimally protected) wireless LAN and neighbors at fairly close range? That's a hole that the unscrupulous might take advantage of. At least, it would provide one explanation for the allegation of downloading stuff which you did not download.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    27. Re:Honeypot? by drb226 · · Score: 2

      Fortunately, this is slashdot. Nobody [of importance] actually clicks through.

    28. Re:Honeypot? by bipbop · · Score: 1

      That was essentially the same conclusion I came to. It claims I downloaded things called Dexter and Nikita; I'm the only user, and I don't think anyone hacked my FreeBSD box just to torrent three TV shows. Moreover, I'd have noticed the bandwidth use. I'm also sure the IP the box is using is the same as it was then.

    29. Re:Honeypot? by hedwards · · Score: 2

      I had a crappy ISP DSL modem which I ultimately replaced with a TP-Link 8816, quite nice and fairly inexpensive. I've had far fewer connection problems since it automatically dials in when it loses its connection without my having to intervene.

    30. Re:Honeypot? by PCTRS80 · · Score: 1

      When they send your ISP a complaint they will check their DHCP records and find out the account on the IP at that time and simply let you know that a complaint was lodged. This happened to me a few years ago when I downloaded a few missed episodes of True blood (prior to HBO on-demand in my area), I contacted the people and the complaint was dropped when I pointed out that I am subscriber HBO. Many of this stuff can be cleared up with a simple conversation.

    31. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I visited site out of curiosity. I don't pirate, yet they say I downloaded a bunch of shows (CSI Miami? Please, who watches that? Well, not me.) I am starting to think that site is not at all legit.

      I agree with you. It claims that I should have downloaded video files of.... who knows what. It's in a language I don't know written with characters I don't know. I have absolutely no idea why I should download anything like that.

    32. Re:Honeypot? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Nikita's a good film - definitely worth hunting down if you haven't seen it.

      Of course, its spiritual sequel, "Leon" is one of the greatest films ever made, but you needed Nikita first.

    33. Re:Honeypot? by Totenglocke · · Score: 5, Informative

      The best part is, the site wants you to log in using facebook to "prove you're human" - that way they can pin an IP address to an actual name and email address. If you don't use the facebook link, they provide something like a 26 letter long captcha (which as far as I can tell, will never let you in, thus forcing you to log in via facebook if you want to view the site). This site sounds like an extreme scam.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    34. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      Yes I have logs, but do I care to dig through them?

      *Checks*

      2011-12-10S13:36:03 DHCPS info Address 192.xxx.x.xx given out to ax:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx

      If new internal address was handed out then modem ether crashed or rebooted, quite possibly resulting in a new IP address.

      Plus "anything that is not specifically targeted at me" isn't that difficult - up to date kill file (hosts), decent firewall and a secure browser is all you need if you just game. Most attack vectors exploit 'user error' at some point, if you are not prone to it you will be safe unless someone specifically targets you.

    35. Re:Honeypot? by SteveTheNewbie · · Score: 2

      You do realise that this site (youhavedownloaded.com) doesn't record your private IP address if you are hidden behind a NAT device right ? and that DHCP leases will expire (and renew) and that your modem doesn't have to 'reboot' or 'crash' in order to get a new public IP address, and that, depending on the access technology and the time it happens, you may not even notice a new public IP address change ?

      Also, if you fire back with 'but I have a static public IP address' then none of your arguments make sense anyway ?

      Oh, and you may want to do some research into how worms work, I'll give you a starter.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm

    36. Re:Honeypot? by makomk · · Score: 2

      According to a comment someone left on the site, they apparently had records for the IP address 192.168.1.1 which have since been removed. So their data collection process is probably busted. (They probably got caught in the usual trap of assuming that trackers provide an accurate list of peers, or worse still assuming that DHT does.)

    37. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David Attenborough, leave that slow-ass torrent alone!

    38. Re:Honeypot? by iiiears · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://panopticlick.eff.org/ - Why do browsers reveal so much about themselves?

      --
      15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
    39. Re:Honeypot? by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's because linux is free and therefor deprives an honest company of it's god given right to profit.
      Why would you freely admit to such unethical behavior, how can you be so proud of stealing caviar from the mouths of CEOs? You monster!

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    40. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work, Tells me i am not a torrent user at all.

    41. Re:Honeypot? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Of course, its spiritual sequel, "Leon" is one of the greatest films ever made, but you needed Nikita first.

      Also released as "The Professional" in the 'States. Agreed with parent's assessment, too.

    42. Re:Honeypot? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Huh, my thought was these folks are trying to drum up subscriptions for VPNs. To he honest, I'm surprised they haven't suggested some sites.

    43. Re:Honeypot? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      I checked my current home IP, it has four listing, two of which are definitely episodes I downloaded, two are someone elses listed from a previous month. I think it's safe to say they're 'legit' insofar as they're recording actual activity and querying it honestly at least some of the time.

    44. Re:Honeypot? by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The extremely long captcha would not work for me at all - forcing people to use the facebook login, so its conveniently a neat little trick connecting People to IP addresses.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    45. Re:Honeypot? by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Please tell me the name of the malware that turns your PC into a seedbox rather than a bot for sending spam, DOS attacks, etc.
      Because I'm pretty sure you're talking out of your arse.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    46. Re:Honeypot? by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Worse, the users all assume that they are experts and KNOW that they could not be infected

      Errrrrr no, most users know they know nothing about computers and trust their security to some sort of AV program, or just don't care. Windows is "easy" to target because it only takes a small percentage of vulnerable targets (i.e. people) to get yourself a few hundred thousand victims. Windows is no more difficult to secure than Linux as the practices are the same - don't run as root/admin, keep shit up to date and don't download dodgy shit. Most Viruses and worms require some form of interaction or permission from the user to spread.

      In fact your argument of "users all assume that they are experts and KNOW that they could not be infected" applies least to windows and most to Mac and Linux users. Many Mac users to this day expect things to "just work" and most don't run any kind of security software. Many Linux users assume that because they're running linux, they're invulnerable - if anything, Android proves that this isn't necessarily the case (I realise it's an apples/oranges comparison, but the difference is that Android is vastly popular while Linux on the desktop is not).

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    47. Re:Honeypot? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

      It looks like they scrape popular torrent sites like TPB and then list every address in the swarm. Problem one is that legal torrents are on there too, and problem two is that trackers list fake random IP addresses to make the data unreliable in court.

      My home IP address is listed with torrents I never touched, and so is my mobile one. That is despite that fact that Vodafone blocks BitTorrent and I have never used it on my 1GB/month plan.

      The whole site is a troll, clearly they either don't understand the data they are collecting or they are deliberately misrepresenting it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm works for me showed last several torrents i downloaded, was correct also, seems they scrape DHT torrent trackers

    49. Re:Honeypot? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Then the information they gather with the site is useless.

    50. Re:Honeypot? by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1
      Mine was! (I'm at an edu; I'm sure this IP has been used to pillage and loot). Kind of funny that there's a facebook connect button on the page. Who the fuck is going to click that? The best part is the music "I" have downloaded sucks, and the .exe of Photoshop is useless on my Mac.

      Also, from the site: "Don't take it seriously
      The privacy policy, the contact us page — it’s all a joke. We came up with the idea of building a crawler like this and keeping the maintenance price under $300 a month. There was only one way to prove our theory worked — to implement it in practice. So we did. Now, we find ourselves with a big crawler. We knew what it did but we didn’t know how to use it. So we decided to make a joke out of it. That’s the beauty of jokes — you can make them out of anything."

      --
      bah.
    51. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innocent until proven guilty only work in a court of law. Any cop knows you're guilty, he/she just isn't sure what to charge you with... yet. Everyone is guilty to a cop.

    52. Re:Honeypot? by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that I clicked and it told me that the only thing I had downloaded was a copy of a trigonometry text book, and its accompanying teacher edition. #nerdalert

    53. Re:Honeypot? by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Interestingly I searched for my old IP, and it listed a bunch of movies which I never downloaded, as well as an Armin Van Buren album which I never downloaded (I listen largely to Jazz). I think part of its fallability is dynamic IP's because those things weren't me. Now however I did get tracked for a home repair book which I had downloaded some time ago.

    54. Re:Honeypot? by dokc · · Score: 1

      i don't "do file-share"... i visited the site... my current dynamically assigned IP wasn't on the list.

      you're an idiot.

      Now it is.

      --
      In love, war and slashdot discussions, everything is allowed.
    55. Re:Honeypot? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      In some countries it's a valid defence to state that illegal activity happened by an intruder in your network, without your knowledge. By visiting a site like this, you became aware of the activity, thus can't use ignorance in the defence. Of course, this specific site is useless, because most people have dynamic IPs.

    56. Re:Honeypot? by botFeeder · · Score: 2

      I have a torrent listed on my iphone, for pc software (I use mac and linux), at a file size that would kil my phone's bandwidth. Your comments are right on the money.

      --
      J/\/
    57. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't appear to be a honeypot as I understand them.
      More of a data collection scam. He's barging about being able to collect information that can only be collected if he's breaking several wire tap laws. so this is most likely a fishing trip funded by MAFIAA et al. good thing he's getting slash dotted.

      I'd recommend everyone TOR his site with about a dozen identities. If he's going to play scare monger no reason why we shouldn't make him pay for his bandwidth.

    58. Re:Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot.

      Is that your sig or are those the only keys you can find on your keyboard?

      PS. You're completely pathetic.

    59. Re:Honeypot? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Only if your skin color is a little darker or you're a little poorer than average.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The MPAA must really be getting desperate. I guess owning Congress just isn't what it used to be.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MPAA? It's just some russian guys. Besides, all of that data is already visible and copyright infringement companies are probably gathering much more data than some guys who made that site.

      It's not scare tactics to let you know what data there is out about you. Unless you want to be ignorant and feel happier if you don't know it.

    2. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by ZackZero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except there's also a disclaiming "Don't take it seriously" link at the page; essentially, they've only made a proof-of-concept.

    3. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by dougmc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a good tactic though. Public shaming has always been effective.

      It's likely to be more effective at stopping people than their mass lawsuits have been.

    4. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who care about their reputation will just use other locations to download to (library, school, coffee-shop, etc), especially as download speeds continue to increase.

    5. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Those Russian guys are about to get hired.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Those who care about their reputation will just use other locations"

      Or better yet, they will live in a saner country where sharing contents is legally supported.

    7. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      The MPAA must really be getting desperate. I guess owning Congress just isn't what it used to be.

      Probably going to throw the clamps on everyone who ever offered Free Wi-Fi and that wi-fi was used to torrent.

      "Mr. Starbucks, you owe us 1 million dollars!" *whisper* *whisper* "make that 100 billion dollars!!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by shaitand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They should give links to the torrents in question when listing the files downloaded. Then the site would be useful.

    9. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

      Shame cultures just end up creating martyrs, they're more focused on making you (feel) guilty.

    10. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Lashat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right. Because file sharing policy is the sole dictate of where I should live.

      --
      For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    11. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here I come sunny Somalia!

    12. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I noticed this after the fact. I was debating being annoyed with a lack of facts by any stretch and/or being generally annoyed by them even joking that I'd want to download green lantern. Really, green lantern? Also associating IP's with the wrong areas was kind of odd, even for the "hurr we have your IP/geolocation!" crap.

      Truth be told, pulling a list of IP's from a torrent is not going to be accurate anyway.

    13. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In a time when you better own a large bank than a few congresscritters if you want a law? Think again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, they do. Click on Some files others have loaded, click on one of those files - takes you to torrent page.

      Or type in name of software, click on link, click on software - takes you to torrent page.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    15. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? They already do. When you click on one of their recommendations, you get the info hash for said torrent. Now prefix it with "magnet:?xt=urn:btih:" and you have a perfectly valid torrent link.

    16. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the site, they are placing tracking cookies on your site, and it sounds like they are reading cookies on your pc, and maybe your browser history. I doubt they are even touching torrent traffic at all.

    17. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      There could be some people that get scared and stop downloading. I think it will just cause most downloaders to get better at hiding their tracks.

    18. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it hasn't. Public shaming is a tool the boring and unimaginative use because they are projecting. It doesn't do anything other than irritate people.

    19. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "Right. Because file sharing policy is the sole dictate of where I should live."

      You can add a longer life expectancy too, for instance.

      But we were talking about sharing content on the Internet, weren't we? And then again, what part of *saner* did you find so cumbersome?

    20. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those russian guys are already hired. To remove yourself from their site, which they let you do "because they are nice guys", you have to log in to your FACEBOOK account, and give out your personal details so that you can be EASILY SUED without any need for warrants to your identity.

    21. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good tactic though. Public shaming has always been effective.

      It's likely to be more effective at stopping people than their mass lawsuits have been.

      How is this public shaming ? Except for rare cases, how many people know their neighbors' IP address ?

    22. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Why should I be ashamed that I watch TV shows? Millions of people do it. I get it over wire while they get it over air. Only difference.

    23. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Reelin · · Score: 2

      Wait, does that mean....

      Finally! A bittorrent search engine that's legal in the US! Way to go **AA!

    24. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Public shaming has always been effective.

      Shaming? I thought it was a leaderboard...

    25. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To stop this, make sure you clean out your cookies on a regular basis. Don't forget the crumb tray either - little bits of cookies fall down there each time you cook a new batch, and if you don't clean it regularly, clever web sites know to look in there. Lots of people don't know this part.

    26. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Violating laws made to protect an artificial economic construct isn't shameful in the least, which is why its association has actually made "pirate" a positive term.

    27. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by exomondo · · Score: 1

      It's a good tactic though. Public shaming has always been effective.

      I see 202.86.210.47 has downloaded Snakes on a Plane, oh what public shame 202.86.210.47 is suffering!

      ...is that working for you?

    28. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It also tended to cut down on the number of out of wedlock little bastards running around.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    29. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      takes you to torrent page

      So, it's a list of links to at least some illegally hosted files that can be downloaded by even more people. MPIAA should send themselves a DCMA notice.

    30. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rated PG-13.

    31. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is that working for you?

      Oooh yeah, baby! Shame me more!

      I've been a baaad boy. Please, the whip next?

    32. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by Lashat · · Score: 1

      The part where content sharing legality is inferred to impact my decision regarding what country I live in. It doesn't even make a top 1000 list for me. Nothing personal. The AC who posted before you gets the joke.

      --
      For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    33. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by increment1 · · Score: 1

      Violating laws made to protect an artificial economic construct isn't shameful in the least, which is why its association has actually made "pirate" a positive term.

      Currency is an artificial economic construct, so should we allow counterfeiting as well? What about IP laws that are responsible for medical advances (or do you posit that we would have the same advances without these laws)?

      Your position is naive, regardless of how much we all may like to pirate.

    34. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      I've already replied to the second claim enough times here to make me nauseous. Take a look at my history if you really want an answer, though I suspect you do not.

      "Currency is an artificial economic construct, so should we allow counterfeiting as well?"

      Currency represents value; it has no inherent value (these days). Yet, at one time, there was a tend of having money backed by real value, as well as people printing their own money left and right legally. The point being - currency exists for a reason I'm not debating, to allow exchange of goods and services for future goods and services. If someone wants to debate that reasoning, more power to them, it is totally aside from my positions on copyright.

      Essentially, you cannot simply act as if copyright is gospel because it exists. Copyright ought to have the same cost-benefit analysis we give to systems like currency. We allow the restriction of counterfeit because it confuses monetary systems and costs the government money. It undermines the idea of currency. Piracy undermines the idea of copyright - yes. That is good, because the more it does, the less people can take the idea of copyright as a foregone conclusion, apart from any value it provides to society as a whole.

      However, as it stands, it never gets this kind of analysis in today's society. I find the concept of owning an idea or information disgusting, on top of the proven harm it does to many fields when carried to its logical conclusion (see music industry). Copyright is not property inherently (and not legally in the purest sense, either); infringement upon it is not stealing. The world will not end when we abolish it, and if I ever said one thing with certainty, it is this: that's only a matter of time.

    35. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by increment1 · · Score: 1

      I maintain that your position is naive. While I am no fan of how copyright is used by various entities (MPAA, RIAA, etc) and the specifics of the legal implementation (duration, erosion of fair use, etc), I at least can recognize the value it actually creates.

      Take the movie or music industries for example (since you already brought them up). The multi multi million dollar budget movies that are produced are only created because of the environment that exists due to copyright. Without those protections, theatres and stores could legally display or sell these titles without having to pay any money to the content creators. No store that paid any money to the creators could compete since their margins would be worse. The end result is that no large budget (or even small budget) titles would be created.

      Now, before you say that free titles could / would be created to replace all of these, look at the facts. People can create free titles now and make them copyright free, but they tend not to. Further than that, the overwhelming titles that are downloaded (movie or music) are the ones produced under the copyright exists model. These titles would simply not exist in a copyright free society, and that is the value that copyright creates.

      As for your comments concerning currency, it still is an artificial economic construct (which you do not seem to deny?). So I take it that you are backing away or at the very least refining your initial statement opposed to ALL artificial economic constructs (so you only oppose those which you personally believe to not have value)?

      Lastly, concerning patents related to the medical field, I am not going to dig up your previous posts as you direct unless your arguments in favor of such are substantially better than the ones you have made here so far.

    36. Re:Geez, we're down to scare tactics now, huh by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      You base all your argument on claims which are not substantiated, arguably countered by history, yet very common arguments for copyright. This is why I say copyright needs a real cost-benefit analysis it isn't getting.

      Not that it matters. Copyright will end. If because people wake up to the immorality of owning ideas, or because the copyright laws become so intrusive they elect widespread outcry (we're seeing this already), it will end, and I think we'll be better off without it.

  3. Not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. We have no records on you. This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all!

    I use public trackers regularly (three or four times a week) and it's all DVD/BluRay rips or TV show caps. So it looks like this index is a load of crap.

    1. Re:Not so much by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ditto. This thing pegged me as downloading something from "Lil Wayne" while not correctly identifying the things that I have actually torrented. Although I usually stay away from stuff that RIAA or MPAA have any jurisdiction over.

      So they aren't going to publically shame me over downloading Centos? I'm so dissapointed.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Not so much by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear, I was downloading Ubuntu for a friend. I'm a Fedora man through and through!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Not so much by PerlJedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm with you on that. I was disappointed when I went there and they didn't list all the linux distro's I'm constantly seeding.
      I do find it funny though, they do list Pioneer One. That's right, shame on me for sharing a TV show that was made to be shared.
      lol.

    4. Re:Not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the "Contact Us" page. They explain that it's all a joke. The site does nothing.

    5. Re:Not so much by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Well, unless your ISP has given you the same IP address for a long, long time, this site isn't going to be accurate.

    6. Re:Not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says the site is a joke but the data is real.

    7. Re:Not so much by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      "So it looks like this index is a load of crap."

      Or maybe they don't have the resources to connect to every single torrent tracker in existence?

      It had a correct listing for something I downloaded two weeks ago.

    8. Re:Not so much by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that. I was disappointed when I went there and they didn't list all the linux distro's I'm constantly seeding. I do find it funny though, they do list Pioneer One. That's right, shame on me for sharing a TV show that was made to be shared. lol.

      I didn't think the site was about shaming; reading some of the links on the site (the privacy policy is somewhat amusing) they say they had the idea as a proof of concept, and implemented it to see if it would work, and thought they may as well make it accessible.

      I checked the other day when I first saw this, and just now. They didn't have anything for me, even though I have also been sharing the Pioneer One show, and a load of stuff from Jamendo.

    9. Re:Not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they do track a ton of Ubuntu ISO and PDF files. I guess we're supposed to be scared to do that. Evil communist pirates probably write all sorts of malware into that. If only there were some way to peek into the code to see what was really going on under the hood, we'd have some proof of those dirty socialist bastards' shenanigans.

    10. Re:Not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't anyone considered that the Rooski's are keeping track of the queries?

  4. Inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I do not live in Marion, North Carolina and did not recently download an 8GB Lord of the Rings related file. I am on a tethered internet connection and that would take weeks.

    I guess the whole concept of non-static IP addresses went right over their head?

    1. Re:Inaccurate by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They obviously can't get information about who uses what IP at what times. But don't worry, when court orders come and you're going to be sued, your ISP has that info and will be able to find you.

    2. Re:Inaccurate by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I was kind of disappointed about this.

      I was expecting them to be using some cool bittorrent specific fingerprinting technique or something .. but nope.. looks like it's a really primitive IP based database. My ISP gives me a dynamic IP and has a fairly sizable range.. I get all manner of randomness when I visit the site.

    3. Re:Inaccurate by slazzy · · Score: 1

      My ISP too, I seem to get a different class-a network each day. They must have a ton of IP addresses.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re:Inaccurate by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've been with four different ISPs over the last decade, and they've all had the same A-class.

      You must live in an overbloated and cheap knockoff of ancient Rome.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:Inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why anyone who doesn't want to get sued will use a vpn that doesn't keep logs.

    6. Re:Inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They obviously can't get information about who uses what IP at what times. But don't worry, when court orders come and you're going to be sued, your ISP has that info and will be able to find you.

      IP != identity. Have my accuser produce local network logs from my open wifi demonstrating my MAC address was the culprit. Oh, you don't have that? Then you don't have anything resembling evidence. kthxbye.

  5. indexed by your Internet address by smoothnorman · · Score: 5, Funny

    But my Internet address is not here. It's in Joe's house, that's right next to mine. And in the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Makelin's house, and a hundred others.

    1. Re:indexed by your Internet address by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:indexed by your Internet address by _0xd0ad · · Score: 4, Funny

      With a username like "iluvcapra", I'd certainly hope you got it.

    3. Re:indexed by your Internet address by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      Not particularly obscure. It is December 12th. Everybody has probably seen that stupid movie half a dozen times already this month on account if it being the only damn thing on TV now.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    4. Re:indexed by your Internet address by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the slashdot post that somehow ties Foxconn workplace abuses to The Bitter Tea of General Yen...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    5. Re:indexed by your Internet address by Pope · · Score: 1

      Never seen it, don't really plan to either.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    6. Re:indexed by your Internet address by Almahtar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You still watch TV?

    7. Re:indexed by your Internet address by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      TV? You mean there's still someone clinging to that dated technology?

      Gee, I couldn't exist on a movie platform anymore that forces me to watch what they choose instead of me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:indexed by your Internet address by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      just because it's on doesn't mean you have to watch it. I watched it once (nothing against the movie, most movies I only watch once or a few times). However, it wasn't enough to get the reference.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    9. Re:indexed by your Internet address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have a poor memory.

    10. Re:indexed by your Internet address by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Sadly I have never seen this movie. I actually thought it was a reference to the Simpsons! (When Bart calls out "what do you mean the bank is out of money!").

      I might download it. Check http://www.youhavedownloaded.com/?q=118.90.98.164 in about an hour.

    11. Re:indexed by your Internet address by ssyladin · · Score: 0

      TV? Bah - it's public domain. Someone, anyone, can convert that puppy to any format they want and copyright / DMCA be damned.

    12. Re:indexed by your Internet address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Props for the seasonally-appropriate pop culture reference.

  6. Facebook data harvesting tool by carlhirsch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, at least we know how they're monetizing this admittedly slick database; they won't allow you to submit a removal request until you provide your facebook credentials. To even reach the text below, you need to unblock Facebook in NoScript:
    ______
    Removal Request

    What’s the matter? You’re brave enough to steal music, movies and programs but only because you thought you weren’t going to get caught? Well whoever told you that was completely wrong and now your information has gone public. Are you afraid of media companies finding out that you’re a pirate or are you afraid of your friends finding out exactly what you’ve been downloading? Whatever your reason may be, the internet is no place for secrets. Even if you use every precaution in the book, there’s always a chance that someone like us will figure out what you’ve been up to. Because, the reality is, if man made it...man will get around it...and man will figure out how to exploit it. It’s just human nature.

    Anyway, like we said before, luck is on your side today because we’re actually nicer than we let on. I never said we wouldn’t bust your chops about it, but at least we’re offering you a chance to redeem yourself — The details can be found after logging in to your Facebook account.

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Said Facebook data will be fed into their publicly available Facebook database, to be released in a week.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by SirGarlon · · Score: 3, Informative

      The details can be found after logging in to your Facebook account.

      I know this is Slashdot and most people get it, but for those who don't -- this looks like a form of phishing to get your Facebook password. I'm not a security expert but I imagine they are using a man-in-the-middle attack to log your password while you log in.

      This is probably exactly what parent intended to imply.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      Damn, I don't have a face book account. Oh wait it doesn't matter, my ISP only provides dynamic IP addresses. I'll just reboot my modem.

    4. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Site said... "you like torrents don't you - or someone in your house does"

      Yeah... true

      "You downloaded this file: Sony Vegas Pro"

      Ummm... no. I've downloaded shit loads of TV and Movies... but not that. Bzzzt. Next.

    5. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doesn't look that way to me - it's the standard Facebook Connect popup window that connects to Facebook.com via HTTPS.

      What part of it looks like phishing for passwords to you?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you manage to get the absurdly long captcha to work (designed to encourage users to login with their Facebook account), the site then hangs interminably and the browser shows it is communicating with Facebook. So Facebook is probably tracking your IP - that of someone who is not logging in with Facebook. Why?

    7. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck would want to use Sony Vegas anyway ? Even if it came with a free case of beer, I still wouldn't touch it.

      I think this site is a joke. They may have sniffed a handful of torrents, but for the most part this seems like that same Russian attention whore (of 3FN fame) trying to make himself relevant by pissing people off. Apparently it wasn't enough for him to host a shit ton of botnet C&C nodes and scam sites...

      Shit like this is why I think we should have an Internet tribunal, where unforgivable swine are judged by a jury of tech-savvy peers and booted off the goddamned wire.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    8. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      I don't care whether this is a standard Facebook widget or not. The site is using "behavioral engineering" (which is a fancy and strangely antiseptic term for "lying."). They are asking you, indeed pressuring you, to log into Facebook from an entry point of their choosing. That entry point is almost certainly a trap.

      Try this experiment. Leave their page. Close your browser completely. Restart it. Go directly to www.facebook.com. Log in. Do you see any message there from the Russian hackers who purport to run the site? If not, they were lying when they said logging in to Facebook would tell you how to get off their list.

      I'll bet you $50 there is nothing there. To collect, just go to www.sirgarlon.ru and log in to your Facebook account. :-)

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    9. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      They are asking you, indeed pressuring you, to log into Facebook from an entry point of their choosing.

      What were you seeing? When I clicked the button, I saw a pop up window that included a URL bar. That URL bar showed an HTTPS URL on the facebook.com domain. That is a legitimate Facebook Connect dialog that is not under their control. My browser auto-filled the form, which is further evidence of its authenticity.

      Are you in any way familiar with Facebook Connect? It doesn't disclose passwords. Unless they have somehow bypassed the cross-domain security of browsers, spoofed the URL bar, or performed a man-in-the-middle attack with a compromised certificate, they cannot phish your Facebook password from this popup window, which is what you claimed they were doing.

      Now, if you want to argue that they aren't being honest when they tell you they will remove you from the list, then go right ahead and argue that. But if you argue that they are phishing passwords, you're going to have to give solid reasons, because the available evidence says otherwise.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    10. Re:Facebook data harvesting tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea looks sleazy as hell, removal request requires you admit fault, and then give all personal details.... legal trick by mpaa.

  7. Zero results by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Informative
    I tried it. Came up with zero results or me. I download a lot too.

    I don't do anything out of the ordinary to otherwise secure or anonymize my downloading using either Transmission or Vuze, for what it's worth.

    1. Re:Zero results by Hadlock · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep (AC here - sorry!) Both myself and my neighbors (we share a connection) are pretty heavy BT users (we use Azureus or "Vuze Classic") and the IP didn't show up anything. We've had the same IP for at least 18 months. Either they're inflating their numbers drastically (who says they aren't lying horribly? This is the MPAA/RIAA after all) or only using encrypted trackers seems to have some effect.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Zero results by Hadlock · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hah. Uh, always hit preview when posting as an AC!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Zero results by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      Thank you for posting this Hadlock, we will be sure to use this in your upcoming civil case.

      Love,

      Media conglomerate.

    4. Re:Zero results by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      How do you submit without hitting preview?
      I only get "Preview","Quote parent" and "cancel" buttons

    5. Re:Zero results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just admitted to a crime and we know who you are. The Federal B.I. will be at your house and you'll rue the day you forgot to check the anonymous box.

    6. Re:Zero results by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      By disabling the D2 system.

      Or right-click "Reply to This" and open it in a new tab, to bypass the Javascript and get the old posting form.

    7. Re:Zero results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the MPAA/RIAA after all

      This is neither, it appears just a project by some folks showing what can easily be accomplished.

    8. Re:Zero results by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, that's how it's always been, ever since 2001 or so. I've tweaked the hell out of my account settings over the years, and when they did that awful 2.0 update earlier this year I think (when the option later became available) I set the discussion style to "Classic Discussion System (D1)", which may allow that option. But I guess that's the pitfall of posting without a net!
       
      P.S. the stock D1 settings are terrible, adjust your score modifiers accordingly:
       
      Insightful +1
      Offtopic +1
      Flamebait +1
      Troll +1
      Informative +6
      Redundant -4
       
      Friend +6
      Fan+6
      Foe +6
      anonymous Modifier +1
      New User Modifier +1
      Small Comment Modifier1, -1
      Long Comment Modifier 1, +1
       
      And then browse at a threshold at +3, Threaded, Oldest First, Index Spill 600 and Reparent Highly Rated Comments as "True". Also helps if you have a healthy friends/foes list. Anybody willing to stick their neck out as an expert in a particular field and making a particularly informative post usually gets an add.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:Zero results by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Same here. They have nothing on me yet.

      I download tons of completely legal stuff (of course) from various public torrent sites and sometimes share for extended periods of time, so you'd think they would have found my IP.

    10. Re:Zero results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't download first run movies from The Pirate Bay, EVER.

      My wife downloaded some shit we never even watched, and now I am named in the Call of the Wild lawsuit against 20000 downloaders. Time Warner gave my information up.

    11. Re:Zero results by Ponder+Stibions · · Score: 1

      I'm am currently downloading using Transmission on Ubuntu with Pirate Bay as one of my trackers. It could not find any downloads on my IP. I call this site out, it can't cope with the scale of the issue to actually be doing this. Even it admits that private trackers stop it from picking you up.....

    12. Re:Zero results by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      You +1 AC? -6, here, AC is dead to me. Grow a spine. :)

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    13. Re:Zero results by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Yeah but AC starts out with 0 points, which means the interesting ones need to be modded up three times before I see them. What would be a +4 interesting post from a regular /. poster would fall below my +3 threshold. Browsing at +3 filters out 99% of the worthless AC posts already, but those rare, moderately interesting ones posted as an AC due to their job (usually the most interesting ones in the thread) still get through.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    14. Re:Zero results by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      That's frighteningly close to the settings I use.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    15. Re:Zero results by Roger+Lindsjo · · Score: 0

      The same for me, none of my ips had any result and I download a lot (Fedora, Ubuntu, free movies). Also, what is up with the "Well, you are in the clear"? If they had registered my downloads of legal content, would I not be in the clear the?

    16. Re:Zero results by allo · · Score: 1

      friend of foe is missing.

    17. Re:Zero results by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I have those set to 0

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  8. missing link to actual users, dynamic IPs, etc by Superken7 · · Score: 1

    "When you visit, it automatically checks and lets you know if your Internet address is in the database."

    Except most people don't have a fixed IP reserved for them. Does that mean I'm going to get the "warning" because someone else on my ISP downloaded content? (Yes.)

    Nevertheless, it's an interesting tool, but this information is probably useless since you still need to contact the ISP in order to know who actually was using that IP in that given time frame.
    Also, keep in mind that this site currently only displays a time frame accurate to a MONTH (e.g. Dec, 2011) as far as I can see.

    If they were trying to scare pirates off, well: Avast, thar! I be not scared!

    1. Re:missing link to actual users, dynamic IPs, etc by BagOBones · · Score: 2

      True but they state in there chat area that they store a full time stamp, they just display a vague one. Probably to keep other companies from scraping their database.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    2. Re:missing link to actual users, dynamic IPs, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for this to hit Facebook. Just think of all the "I checked your IP address and you were downloading [insert porn]! We're OVER!" Better yet posting it on your wall that X former friends watches [insert fetish porn] and you can't get rid of it even if you didn't actually download it.

    3. Re:missing link to actual users, dynamic IPs, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Facebook friends don't have my IP address. And anyway, if they did, they'd just see the porn that my brother has downloaded. I haven't downloaded very much porn since I started taking Spironolactone.

  9. Already defeated... by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

    ... by Tor. I regularly download torrents from behind a draconian campus proxy using Tor. (Yes, I know, the Tor guys don't want us running torrents with it. But I'm too lazy to go looking for other solutions.) I'm "in the clear." :P

    1. Re:Already defeated... by forkfail · · Score: 5, Funny

      Already defeated By-Tor

      Yes, the Snow Dog did.

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, that makes you a giant asshole.

    3. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'm "in the clear." :P

      Not anymore, since your comment is not anonymous. And you just confessed your sins in public.

    4. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you have no evidence that his "confession" is even true, or, if it is, what he downloaded.

    5. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but its piracy, committed by a second class corporation. So evidence doesn't matter, just point, accuse and hysterically shout out an obviously fictitious figure as damages

    6. Re:Already defeated... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Use I2P or just go encrypted & peerblocked, your warez downloads are bogging down the connection of people with real problems.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already defeated By-Tor

      Yes, the Snow Dog did.

      You are awesome. So sayeth an AC

    8. Re:Already defeated... by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      I thought Tor relays were configured to reject P2P packets...

    9. Re:Already defeated... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      ... by Tor. I regularly download torrents from behind a draconian campus proxy using Tor. (Yes, I know, the Tor guys don't want us running torrents with it. But I'm too lazy to go looking for other solutions.) I'm "in the clear." :P

      You may be "in the clear" but you're also terribly selfish a-hole.

    10. Re:Already defeated... by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Who says downloading Ubuntu torrents provided the Ubuntu website is piracy?

    11. Re:Already defeated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you grabbed legal torrents through Tor just for the hell of it?

    12. Re:Already defeated... by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Indeed I'll try I2P.

    13. Re:Already defeated... by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      No, because our campus proxy has a 150MB/file download size limit. Tor helps overcome that, and I can seed too.

    14. Re:Already defeated... by wdef · · Score: 1

      Fail. You're *not* in the clear running torrents over Tor because most bittorrent clients very helpfully harvest and send your IP over tor. Read the article on the Tor website. Not only are you choking the tor network, you are likely not obscuring your IP address.

  10. Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And if they track any IP address from Switzerland, they are breaking the Swiss data protection laws and can be sued for damages for collecting the IP and breach of privacy.

    See http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/09/switzerland-gathering-ip-addresses-from-bittorrent-sites-illegal.ars

    What happened to another IP slurper...
    "But Switzerland, which is not an EU member, has decided that it can't sanction Logistep's behavior. The country's Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner, Hanspeter Thür, took Logistep to court and this week won a major victory. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that IP addresses are in fact personal information and that companies like Logistep can't go about slurping them up for mere civil cases like file-swapping lawsuits. Logistep must cease all current copyright infringement data collection.

    In a press release issued yesterday, Thür praised the court's decision. He sees Logistep as trying to "assume tasks clearly in the State's domain." Only the state can violate personal privacy, and only when pursuing criminal cases."

    1. Re:Illegal by Splab · · Score: 1

      Think the same goes for quite a lot of places around Europe; Just checked my own IP and nothing shows up, if it had I'd emailed forbrugerombudsmanden and complained.

    2. Re:Illegal by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      And if they track any IP address from Switzerland, they are breaking the Swiss data protection laws and can be sued for damages for collecting the IP and breach of privacy.

      I'm sure that the Russian courts take the enforcement of Swiss data protection laws and civil judgments very seriously.

    3. Re:Illegal by xaxa · · Score: 1

      According to the first article I found, they're also breaking UK law. http://www.out-law.com/page-8060

      Collecting IP addresses isn't illegal, but building a profile tied to an IP address is.

      An IP address in isolation is not personal data under the Data Protection Act, according to the Information Commissioner. But an IP address can become personal data when combined with other information or when used to build a profile of an individual, even if that individual's name is unknown.

      However, they're from the USA, so I doubt they care.

  11. Don't take it seriously by Frederic54 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the site:

    The privacy policy, the contact us page — it’s all a joke. We came up with the idea of building a crawler like this and keeping the maintenance price under $300 a month. There was only one way to prove our theory worked — to implement it in practice. So we did. Now, we find ourselves with a big crawler. We knew what it did but we didn’t know how to use it. So we decided to make a joke out of it. That’s the beauty of jokes — you can make them out of anything.

    However, if you have a better idea — don’t hesitate to contact us.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Don't take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a joke. It's all about bitcoins!!

      On other hand, studying torrent protocols has two sides. We found a very simple way to make peer-to-peer downloads absolutely untraceable. The general idea is somewhat similar to what BitCoins does. That would be a nightmare for the recording industry.

      See!! This is another slashvertisement of bitcoins! Except it is subliminal. That's how they get you!

      /me puts on double-layer of aluminum undergarments, shiny side out

    2. Re:Don't take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after what - an hour? the site is already slashdotted..... :)

    3. Re:Don't take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blog article that Slashdot linked to is slashdotted. The website itself doesn't appear to be.

    4. Re:Don't take it seriously by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      But the data is legit - at least in my case - they got me pegged:

      JSTOR_01_PhilTrans (32.48 GB)

      I'm not sure why they don't list my "legal" downloads like ubuntu and debian releases. It'd be more interesting if they listed all file sharing activity, not just torrents from usually-pirate sites.

  12. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've uploaded almost 2 tb and none of my ip's show up. It's either borked or I did better than I thought covering my tracks.
     
    I'm paranoid so I'll say it's not accurate.

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same-o, same-o here. I downloaded from TPB by torrent the entire Scorsese movie collection just last week and --- this site says I'm clean!

      I took absolutely NO measures to hide my dynamically-assigned NAT address, though, in truth, I connect to my DSL ISP for weeks of uptime....or more.

      I guess I'm one lucky Foole!

  13. My Car by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ha! They didn't catch me in the act of downloading my car.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:My Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what about the bear? O_o

    2. Re:My Car by Pope · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what about the bear? O_o

      Bear drives, does not download.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:My Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! It would be better if you'd download the site's author car without him noticing!

    4. Re:My Car by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Oh my god. You actually bought the DVD?

  14. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    now I can see what all the other people who share the DHCP pool at my ISP are downloading

  15. Information wants to be free, right? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Information wants to be free, right? IMO this is awesome.

    1. Re:Information wants to be free, right? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yes it does! or at least it obeys the concentration gradient. It flows for concentrated repository to out to the ether around it unless energy is applied to keeping secrets. Just like keeping your house warmer inside than out in winter requires energy, even with great insulation your slowly lose heat to the outside world so it is with information.

      Which is one should be careful about creating it in the first place. Before you pull all those meaningless facts into that big database, relate them and turn them into information STOP and consider that information *IS* at some point going to flow places you can't anticipate, and make a decision about how risky that may be.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  16. Hmm, not too great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have quite a few torrents open. Some legal, some less legal. But it seems they only listed 4 of them, and 1 of them wasn't even me downloading it.

    Since I have seeded all those that they listed to a ratio of 2+, I decided to remove them.

    Nice proof of concept, but I wonder if they work with any semiprivate torrent tracker.

  17. Yeah right... by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I'm on ADSL. My IP address changes every few hours. Meaning I've got the 'same' IP as about 20 million other people. I foresaw this kind of crap a long time ago, so much so that I have a script that logs my public IP every minute in case sometimes comes knocking at the door. At least I can have a lawyer show the log. For what it's worth.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Yeah right... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The only way a lawyer would be knocking at someones door is if they got a warrent to obtain the personal details of a customer using a specific IP address at a specific time from an ISP. How would logging your public IP help you? Other than telling them they have the correct person.

  18. So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, getting people's personal data voluntarily (well, okay, via semi-blackmail) is one way to reduce the workload for your legal staff.

    Seriously, who would be stupid enough to login to facebook and FURTHER link themselves? This is just asking to be sued.

    1. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by zill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, getting people's personal data voluntarily (well, okay, via semi-blackmail) is one way to reduce the workload for your legal staff.

      I just increased their workload by a dozen names:
      Oliver Clothesoff
      Al Coholic
      Jacques Strap
      Seymour Butz
      Homer Sexual
      Mike Rotch
      Hugh Jass
      Amanda Huggenkiss
      Anita Bath
      Ivana Tinkle
      Maya Buttreek
      Yuri Nater

    2. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good reason to create a throw-away FB page.

    3. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by steelfood · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of stupid people out there. Just look at how profitable spam is.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me sir, but I believe it is Maya Buttreek_s_.

    5. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Heed00 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, who would be stupid enough to login to facebook and FURTHER link themselves?

      Uhm, all those people that made sending Spam a profitable industry.

      --
      Thought thinks itself.
    6. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by randy+of+the+redwood · · Score: 0

      Excellent, I'll add:
      Norma Stitz (sorry, she is real)
      Jenna Talls
      Amanda Lynne
      Corey O'Graff
      Dan Druff,
      Duane Pipe

      and everyone's favorite - Mike Hunt.

      --
      The sun is the same in a relative way, but you are shorter of breath and one day closer to death
    7. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is such a thing as "semi-blackmail". There's either blackmail, or not blackmail.

      Either way, I'm not giving this russian scumbag the pleasure of hoarding my info. Piss off the establishment, not the people.

    8. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, getting people's personal data voluntarily (well, okay, via semi-blackmail) is one way to reduce the workload for your legal staff.

      Seriously, who would be stupid enough to login to facebook and FURTHER link themselves? This is just asking to be sued.

      i was smart enough to copy/paste the url from the article. there is no facebook login request. the articles host requires a fb login to get a 'clickable' link oh yeah and it didn't find anything on me in it's db.

    9. Re:So that's how they'll figure out who to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys, have you ever thought that a new fb account is very easy to spot? :)
      Another question - do you always blame fire-tracks when you see a fire? And alarm. Fire alarms cause fires. That's for sure. You always hear them when it's a fire. :)

  19. Well... by Ben_R_R · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdoting is one way to solve the problem.

    1. Re:Well... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      That only works if the editors made the url an active link. Most people are too lazy to highlight and drag.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Well... by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      "Nobody goes there anymore. It's always slashdotted." --Yogi Berra

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  20. Okay, peeps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring on the Slashdotting!

    mirror?

  21. Slashdoted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It didn't take long...

  22. imagination by poetmatt · · Score: 2

    how many of these downloads can they even validate occurred?
    how many ip addresses can they even confirm are valid?
    oh right, facts. forgot about those things.

    Instead, it's some RIAA themed site that says "Hi, Pirate!" at the top of it.

    1. Re:imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It had a correct listing for me.

    2. Re:imagination by poetmatt · · Score: 1, Funny

      clearly we can all validate the posting of an anonymous person with no claims in it. mod up as funny for sure.

      I mean after all, my great grandfather's sister's nephew's uncle's brother must be a reliable source!

      sheesh.

    3. Re:imagination by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read fully, it's quite tongue-in-cheek, particularly when your IP is clean (Go Usenet!).

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    4. Re:imagination by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Fine, it had mine too.

      However, it only had one file, which I had been sharing for a while. Several files which I had just leeched & turned off were not listed.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:imagination by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I mean after all, my great grandfather's sister's nephew's uncle's brother must be a reliable source!

      Save Ferris!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:imagination by Teun · · Score: 1
      Me to.

      It was a handy list and reading it I realised I missed downloading Kubuntu 10.04, probably because I did an update.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:imagination by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      What part of "it was a joke site" did you miss?

    8. Re:imagination by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss it. But it's not so funny when it's listing files that I'm currently hosting.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:imagination by CaffinatedSloth · · Score: 1

      Are you calling your great uncle a liar?

  23. lolz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pulled back 1 torrent of the hundreds I've downloaded in the past few months. It was on the pirate bay of a Channel 4 Series and the only reason I grabbed it there was my usual private trackers were down or skipped the release.

    If you're dumb enough to only use the big public open trackers then they'll have plenty on you. Otherwise it's nothing to be concerned with.

  24. Do take it seriously by AceJohnny · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the "Contact Us" page (which, among other things, lists a postal address in an Antarctic research base):

    This site is a joke. But its data is not.

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    1. Re:Do take it seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This poster is headed to McMurdo Station next month... want me to hand-deliver any mail?

  25. MOD ARTICLE DOWN by Rary · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, can we have a "Remove Article" option for articles like this that are quickly revealed to be a joke? The site doesn't track anything, and it even says so. The article is pointless.

    --

    "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  26. VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VPN, anyone ? Witch serious p2p user still downloads in the open, without a *good* VPN solution for obscurity purpose ?

  27. someguyusingyourwifidownloaded.com by xiando · · Score: 1

    also make sure to visit: someguywhopreviouslyhadyourdynamicipdownloaded.com

    1. Re:someguyusingyourwifidownloaded.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you expect from a bunch of Nekulturny Russians

  28. "You" != you personally! by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    Here, "you" clearly means someone at a single point in time accessed the internet *via* an IP address traceable to a known account holder.
    This has been debated endlessly and surely is common knowledge amongst those supposed to know better.

  29. Is that even allowed? by techgeek0279 · · Score: 1

    Pretty creepy in my opinion.

  30. Connecting to a tracker != downloading by zill · · Score: 1

    It would take me less than an hour to write a .torrent file crawler and a modified bittorrent client that kept on connecting to different trackers and requesting different torrents. I'm sure there are hundreds of code gurus on /. that could do this trivial task in half the time.

    Dear courts and judges:
    Connecting to a tracker != copyright infringement
    Requesting a block from a peer != copyright infringement (for all we know the ISP could've used DPI to drop that packet)
    Applying for a search warrant, getting it signed by a judge, and then legally seizing the computer as evidence is the only way to prove that someone committed copyright infringement. Anything less is just hearsay.

    1. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the problem is that the items you mentioned are probably enough to get an idiot judge to sign a warrant.

    2. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Technically, downloading something copyrighted isn't copyright infringement either (assuming that private use copying is exempt from infringement, which is often the case), but it's a much harder case to make if (or when) one happens to already realize that what they are copying from is already infringing before they even copied it (because the copy at the other end being made publicly available would void any otherwise claimed notion of private use, and so if the person who is sharing did not otherwise have permission to make that copy for distribution, then they are infringing on the copyright, and by extension, the copy of the work they are sharing is infringing).

    3. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

      I'm curious why you think the judge would be an idiot to sign such a warrant?

      I thought warrants were to keep police from going on fishing expeditions where they just show up at your house and look for something, anything, to bust you for. Demonstrating that someone at that address connected to a tracker, requested a block, and now they'd like legally seize the computer to see if the block arrived seems like the iconic use of a warrant.

      --
      You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    4. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would take me less than an hour to write a .torrent file crawler and a modified bittorrent client that kept on connecting to different trackers and requesting different torrents. I'm sure there are hundreds of code gurus on /. that could do this trivial task in half the time.

      I'd love to see that. The clock is running. I hope there are no crashes, and it *just*works*. Pls post your source to somewhere public.

    5. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the judge would be an idiot because there is no real evidence that anything happened. Nothing points to an individual person, and considering the nature of the internet, it could've been just about anyone.

      What do I think should happen? Nothing. A potential loss of profit may or may not have happened? Sorry, but I don't really care. Seizing people's equipment based on such a flimsy thing doesn't sit well with me.

    6. Re:Connecting to a tracker != downloading by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Remember, the judges, police, and district attorney get their pay check from the same place.

  31. My IP address? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    They mean the IP address of my gateway, not *MY* IP address. Even then, it's not *MINE*, it comes from a pool of IPs handed out by my ISP's DHCP server and it changes periodically. The address assigned my gateway today could have been last used by the Disney Princess Bootleg Video Mafia, and I'd be a little offended if I found that I was being impugned as a distributor of low-brow animated bastardizations of classic fairy tales. Doubly so if some numb-nuts from Disney's legal department gets all uppity and litigious about it.

    1. Re:My IP address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that would get you far in court... When the jury is done laughing they will give you a huge fine.

  32. Not concerned by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Dynamic IP FTW!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  33. Tor is hilarious by utkonos · · Score: 1

    Fire up Tor and visit this site! It scrolls on for pages and pages!

  34. Meaningless by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

    But my IP address keeps changing, and I am sure some one had my current address before me as some one else will have mine affter me. Kinda makes this meaningless in my opinion.

  35. Blatant honeypot alert! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    WARNING! Only do this if you are an idiot! Don't unblock / log into Facebook or anything else. Odd that they presume you have an account too.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  36. The "spying on your friends" page is a FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the pages where it says:
    "it looks like we’ve picked up some activity from your friends or family" I gave my results from completely different IP addresses, In completely different countries, for content I've never heard of.
    Why not say "some random other internet users" if that's what they mean"

  37. It works OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with my server's IP : this site brilliantly detected that I had downloaded an ISO of the latest stable release of Open Indiana (Open Solaris' fork). Feels good.

  38. Anonymous MIA? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    So where is Anonymous when you really need them.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Anonymous MIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows. I think they may have taken jobs with the MPIAA.

    2. Re:Anonymous MIA? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Who's to say this isn't being done by Anonymous?

  39. False positives by sinij · · Score: 1

    Interesting, website says that I have downloaded shows when in fact I never touch pirate torrents. So ether someone spoofing my IP or neighbors somehow got past MAC filtering and authentication. I am fairly sure my provider did not shuffle my IP address, but then I don't keep track of this. Should I, in case *AA comes knocking on my door?

    1. Re:False positives by wdef · · Score: 1

      Since a lot of posters are reporting false positives, I'd say lawyers might have a good chance of shooting down the reliability of this "evidence" in court. In which case, the MPIAA etc might send the usual extortion letter but be loathe to follow up in court. But IANAL.

  40. Bullsh!t by harduser · · Score: 1

    I just checked this site - it displayed a list of things it thought I downloaded, but none of those has even ever caught my fancy, so apparently it does not work in my case. I'm only using internet via 3G mobile network and each time I connect I'm getting a random IP, so the records on this site may contain all the files downloaded by the same IP, but not the same user.

  41. Site Only Lists the Foolish .. by DiabolicallyRandom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... And that's assuming their dynamic IP was even theirs at the noted time. Most people who download torrents on a regular basis disable DHT - and since their method of finding information is via DHT, then disabling BHT lowers any chance of showing in their lists to zero.

  42. Rick-roll, here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK how about all of us seed 100 popular filenames and sizes with RickRolls and leave them up for a week, just to mess things up a bit.

    What, this is /.? I thought it was /b/. Dammit!

  43. Pretty much useless by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Hi. We have no records on you.

    This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all! It happens.

    Given all the TV shows I've downloaded over the years both current and old, I suspect this site really doesn't do much if you're not downloading torrents from "big names" like The Pirate Bay. With their grotesque lack of accuracy in their date, I do hope that anybody sued as a result of the information they do collect is wise enough to fight and question the validity of the data as a whole -- it's clearly not accurate, and likely to result in "fishing expedition" lawsuits such as we've already seen from the RIAA and MPAA for years.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  44. I'll stand up and say it: by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It's a Wonderful Life" is a horrible movie.
    The only reason it's remembered is because it fell into the public domain.

    see you in Hell, modpoints!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The female star in that movie is about the only thing worth watching.

    2. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by unjedai · · Score: 1

      I'll stand up and say that you're wrong - or, since you're judging art, at least in the small minority. That story you linked to praises the movie and gives several reasons why it's in Roger Ebert's list of "Great Movies". You gave no reasons why you think it's horrible. The movie has a very high 8.7 out of 10 stars at IMDB.com based on over 100,000 user ratings. It was nominated for 5 Oscars the year it came out and, although it didn't win any, it has won other awards. Perhaps being in the public domain has helped the movie - but that's not the only reason it's remembered.

    3. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      The only reason it's remembered is because it fell into the public domain.

      Which is an interesting point (whether fully correct or not): TV stations all around the country and the world have something to show on Christmas, for free, that gets them possible ad income, all due to the expiration of the copyright on that movie. Something they might want to consider the next time a copyright extension act is brought up.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      It helped the Jimmy Stewart, Donna Reed and Frank Capra were all independently wealthy from decades of work on other movies (and in Reed's case, a self-titled television series) and were happy to afford to let one go. Henry Travers didn't mind IAWL showing on TV as long as he was getting his checks for Bells of St. Mary's and Mrs. Miniver, and Tom Mitchell was probably was too busy hiring accountants to count his Gone with the Wind royalty payments to worry about his turn as Uncle Billy.

      Nowadays that sort of thing would never slip into PD, the royalty income is a lot less marginal...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    5. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You gave no reasons why you think it's horrible.

      Not really necessary.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    6. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      "It's a Wonderful Life" is a horrible movie.
          The only reason it's remembered is because it fell into the public domain.

        see you in Hell, modpoints!

      Did you even read your own link? To whit:

      What is remarkable about "It's a Wonderful Life" is how well it holds up over the years; it's one of those ageless movies, like "Casablanca" or "The Third Man," that improves with age.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      fine, here's one : Zuzu can't play piano worth shit. And she just keeps banging on those keys.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's a sad, crotchety, get-of-my-lawn day when you realize that people can't refer to Donna Reed by name and have people know WTF you're talking about...

    9. Re:I'll stand up and say it: by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Zuzu was sick upstairs, Janie was playing the piano. Keep it straight.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  45. Because it's totally accurate... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi. We have no records on you.

    This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all!

    I torrent a ton. On that IP. I don't use private trackers. I am even seeding now.

    Their detection method is clearly terrible.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:Because it's totally accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I torrent using big-name torrent sites (EZTV, Demonoid), although I do it in a fairly limited way (specific things, mostly TV and music -- which are legally a grey area here in Canada). I am also not listed by them.

    2. Re:Because it's totally accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same happened to me, i've downloaded plenty of torrents. private and public trackers, my ip address is not dynamic, and nothing shows up on their site.

    3. Re:Because it's totally accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect they have set up several DHT nodes instead of querying public trackers.
      IIRC the address and port of a node determine the distance to the ideal node for tracking a certain info hash.
      So they could get to about 1/65536th of an info hash just by varying port numbers.

      Combine that data with metadata exchange or isohunt and you've got the name and list of files of that torrent.

    4. Re:Because it's totally accurate... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I am not concerned for a couple of reasons. First, I am on a dynamic IP. It has sometimes stayed the same for nearly a year. Then it might change a couple of times in a week. There's now way to tell in advance. It might have even changed several times without my noticing.

      Also, I keep my router open intentionally, so neighbors can use it if they want. And I have the strongest router signal in the neighborhood.

      I don't give a damn if they download something once in a while, as long as they don't interfere with my own use.

    5. Re:Because it's totally accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably get from private trackers

  46. Inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They seem to have missed all my downloads of the install CDs for SGI Irix 6.5 as well.

  47. Hilarious. by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    If you're going to "pirate" something, make sure to use Peerblock. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Hilarious. by allo · · Score: 1

      because a blacklist is always up2date and complete. of course. and some tracking company cannot just use dsl like a normal customer. and of course they will always use ips with their company name in the whois.

  48. Wow by CapnStank · · Score: 4, Informative

    I sort of tire of the ol' Slashdot jumping to conclusions but here's how it works:

    1. They visit public tracker websites.
    2. They query the tracker for a list of peers given a torrent hash (not difficult)
    3. Dump all data into the database that can be searched through their website

    That means your data is not on there if you're a torrent user because you're using a tracker they aren't indexing or you have a dynamic ip that they haven't categorized yet. In the same way this is why you can get false positives. All this B.S. about honey pots or fear mongering is dumb considering how straight forward this website is.

  49. it only had 2 out of about 1000 things i torrented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one was from a public shitty tracker and the other was from some dickhead who i always thought was a little sketchy and now will avoid. i downloaded a bunch of porn from isohunt but it didn't show up, haha on them and none of my stuff from obscure private trackers showed up either. oh well just one more reason russians are scummy thugs.

  50. "You don't download torrents! Isn't that veeeird?? by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    "This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all! It happens."

    Yeah, sometimes people just happen to not pirate movies and things (and, alright, haven't needed an Ubuntu installer in a while)..just how things work out sometimes!

    Mostly wanted to see if anybody else around here was up to something.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  51. That isn't very impressive by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    This is nothing. My last job involved p2p analytics among other things. You have no idea how easilly the system can be subverted and how much information can be harvested. The good news for you guys is that the RIAA are cheap ass bastards who don't like to pay their bills, so the company went under and as far as I know the technology we used has been shelved.

  52. I tried it from my EVO 3D at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over the 4G network, said that I had downloaded The Twilight Saga, Breaking Dawn.

    I want to sue them for slander. I would NEVER watch that teenage girl necro-beastiality movie.

  53. Ignore it by bLanark · · Score: 1

    Ignore it.

    They claim to have indexed 104.22TB in 100,800 torrents.

    Most slashdotters have got that much just on optical media, let alone on spindle.

    This is a drop in the ocean, it's no suprise your local starbucks isn't listed.

    --
    Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
  54. Does the chicken dance by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Oh Ya, uh huh, I'm not listed. Inflated numbers, scam, or facebook ip's
    I'm not listed.

    Might send a little something to PeerBlock.

  55. Ah, facebook integration... by atlasdropperofworlds · · Score: 0

    The site also uses the facebook API, so if you're one of the bagillions of unwary people out there and are always logged in to facebook, they could now have your name to go with the IP...

    1. Re:Ah, facebook integration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't how it works. You have to give permission before they get any information from Facebook, however Facebook will know that you visited the site if you are logged in.

  56. dhcp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 4 ISPs all with DHCP IPs ... good luck with that "ïnvestigation" :)

  57. russian jews can't black mail me bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i'm in the mood to fap to some tranny porn i just go to ashemaletube.com, not waste time with torrents. nice try though.

  58. Doesn't know popular software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't seem to know about Linux distros. I queried openSUSE-12.1-DVD-i586.iso and got no hits.

  59. for those who don't get the reference by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    for those who don't get the reference, "By-Tor and the Snow Dog" is a song on the Rush album Fly By Night (and general nicknames for two of the band members IIRC)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  60. Sometimes.... by Foxhoundz · · Score: 2

    I'm thankful that I have a dynamic IP. It might the only defense I have if I get sued.

  61. for those unwilling/unable to watch the video by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    for those unwilling/unable to watch the video:
    it's a clip from a Wonderful Life, the scene where there's a run on George Bailey's bank. George explains that the bank's assets are invested "in Joe's house, that's right next to mine. And in the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Makelin's house, and a hundred others". i.e. not in cash-on-hand for the depositors. at least the loans aren't in default.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  62. Static by newbreedkay · · Score: 1

    too bad for everybody using static ip.

    --
    Free MMA Training - http://www.newbreedacademy.com
  63. yeah - not accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    took a look and it wasn't accurate at all.

  64. Delicious Blackmail... by acedotcom · · Score: 0
    Of course I have download maybe 200 different torrents this month, all of it copy-written. it only found 4 items, but whatever. Just for the sake of not wanting sleazy Russians to sell my torrenting habits for profit I look at the removal tool and figured it would be better to leave my torrent habits in their hands then give them what they really want which is access to my facebook account.

    USING THIS APP REQUIRES: Your e-mail address Your profile info: description, hometown, likes, location, relationship details, website and work history

    WHAT DO THEY NEED THAT INFO FOR? The whole thing is a scam on a level ALMOST on par with the RIAA/MPAA. If you are a facebook user now is a good time to click through and report the app as malicious.

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
    1. Re:Delicious Blackmail... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      What do they need that info for? I'm sure that binding real names to IP's is of use to some folks....

      --
      Check your premises.
  65. They're clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked up 127.0.0.1 on their database, they came up clean.

  66. Visiting it is a confession. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you haven't downloaded anything, why would you check using same IP address that's in the database?

    Visit it and lose plausible deniability.

  67. That site is rubbish by rapidreload · · Score: 1

    OK, I went to the site. I have a dynamic IP but I know for a fact I haven't disconnected anytime in the last couple of days, so if the site was worth anything it should have picked up my downloading of the finale of Boardwalk Empire at the very least.

    What does it think I downloaded:

    "Cyprus Isles - Hard Fucking Dogging.wmv"

    Good work.

    --
    To all newcomers - people here are very close-minded and can't handle complaints about Linux. Keep this in mind.
  68. What?! I'm outraged! by supercrisp · · Score: 2

    Someone at my IP address has been downloading porn! This indexing of that must stop!

  69. Total BS by ternarybit · · Score: 1

    The site says I'm a pirate and I've downloaded tons of warez and porn from a Hughes Net satellite connection capped at 500MB per day. I check my modem's quota regularly and we never use more than a few MB. Obviously either a) making stuff up or b) not accounting for dynamic IPs whatsoever.

  70. Peer Block is worse than useless by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    Copyright trolls use residential ISP accounts with dynamic IPs like everyone else. By the time you've figured out who they are (and how exactly did you do that?) they've already got a new IP. The only people you're protecting yourself from are other legitimate peers.

  71. You can sit down now. by westlake · · Score: 1

    "It's a Wonderful Life" is a horrible movie.
    The only reason it's remembered is because it fell into the public domain.

    It is a James Capra film starring Jimmy Stewart, Lionel Barrymore and a young Donna Reed. The release of so sentimental a fantasy in the immeadiate postwar years may have doomed to it to failure at the box office.

    But you could say with just as much truth that 1939 was not the right year for "The Wizard of Oz," which found its television audience in the mid-fifties.

    Despite the lapsed copyright, television stations that aired it still were required to pay royalties. Although the film's images had entered the public domain, the film's story was still protected by virtue of it being a derivative work of the published story "The Greatest Gift", whose copyright was properly renewed by Philip Van Doren Stern in 1971. The film became a perennial holiday favorite in the 1980s, possibly due to its repeated showings each holiday season on hundreds of local television stations.

    It's a Wonderful Life

    95% Fresh --- Critics ---- 94% Audience

    It's a Wonderful Life (1946)

  72. But, What if it *was* a real MAFIAA honeypot. by pgregg · · Score: 1

    Ignore all the facebook angles, consider if someone actually wanted to build database of known copyright infringers (I refuse to use "pirate" since it isn't hijacking ships on the open seas)...

    Scenario: MAFIAA would like a "high value target" database of IPs to check each time a new high-value release comes out.
    1. MAFIAA have zero IPs today.
    2. MAFIAA "front" puts out a "History of Torrent Downloads By IP"
    3. "We" check it - and hand them our IP, which they add to the database.
    3a. Whatever the site tells you back when you check is irrelevant.

    When high-value release is made:
    1. Pass IP database to associates who have the tools to port probe looking for torrent ports and query what they are seeding.
    2. Pass confirmed hits IPs to the "Collections" dept for letters to ISPs and/or John Doe lawsuits.

    Probing a few hundred thousand people who thought "crap, did they catch me?" is all of a sudden so much easier and your paranoia ironically leads to you being caught.

  73. It's a facebook account/details farming scam by tommyhj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gathering torrent IP's from popular sites isn't difficult.

    But they clearly want people very badly to sign in with their facebook accounts. First they're scaring people to sign in by promising removal from their database. If you visit the site again they provide you with a choice - an impossible (!) captcha or facebook. It's social hacking.

    First off - don't let them scare you. Copyright holders has all the info anyway. Second, don't ever give away your facebook credentials to a third party that you don't trust. Third, don't trust these people.

    1. Re:It's a facebook account/details farming scam by schmiddy · · Score: 1

      an impossible (!) captcha

      Thought I was the only one who noticed this. The captcha can not be solved -- I tried three times, and each time I was pretty sure I had the captcha correct. Each time, it simply refreshed the page with a new captcha. Something about the site smells mighty fishy, like they really really want your Facebook account details for some reason...

      --
      http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
  74. Its a trap!! Dont do it! by coolate · · Score: 1

    Logging in with Facebook shares your address, email and name, so they can link your info with your IP, so they can later sell that info, or make threats. JUST DON'T DO IT. Click the log in, then report it to Facebook!!

    1. Re:Its a trap!! Dont do it! by Wyzard · · Score: 1

      Looks like it shares more than that. The source for the login button is:

      <fb:login-button perms="user_likes,user_about_me,email,user_hometown,user_relationship_details,user_location,user_website,user_work_history" onlogin="oRRQ.login();">

      The site has no legitimate need for all that info if it just wants to know that you're a real person.

  75. the captcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently they cant even log my accurate captcha submission.

  76. They just want your Facebook by Kernull · · Score: 3, Informative

    At the time of writing this comment, they have implimented a facebook-login in order to see your list. I attempted to use their captcha device instead, because I hate facebook (which was somewhere around 20 characters long, case sensitive). I tried to enter the captcha about 15 times using different images and each time it told me I was wrong. I don't believe it is possible to login by their captcha and they are mandating the facebook.com login. I suspect this website might be a trap / facebook scraper. Earlier in the day I was able to see 'my results' which were incorrect.

    1. Re:They just want your Facebook by ark1 · · Score: 1

      1. Create a fake facebook page impersonating a top RIAA exec. 2. Visit this page. 3. Wait and profit!

  77. Dangerous site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to check mine, but the landing page asks me to login with my facebook account so that it knows that I'm a human.
    I do not have a facebook account, so I had to fill in that horrible long captcha.
    After four failed attempts, I gave up.

    However: Suppose you did have a Facebook account. Would that allow them to tie facebook account X with friends Y and real name Z to IP address L which has downloaded torrents T,J,K, and M?
    It sounds like a trap! A method for linking your real name to your torrent history! (Even a fake torrenting history)

  78. Impossible captcha by arobatino · · Score: 1

    Is anyone able to actually use the site via captcha, or is it just phishing for Facebook passwords? Even if I get a captcha where all the characters are readable and unambiguous (is it "O" or "0"?), and double-check it before entering, it still says it's wrong.

    1. Re:Impossible captcha by wdef · · Score: 1

      And the site appears to be communicating with Facebook (a tracker?) after you enter what might be the correct captcha.

    2. Re:Impossible captcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a trap IMO. The captcha seems impossible (tried about 10 times) and they have no link to a privacy policy so they can do whatever they want with the information they collect from those stupid enough to log in with facebook. Of note the site was different when they got links from /. and krebs.

  79. Re:TV by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    Not any more. As of a few days ago I sold my 2001 vintage rear-projection TV. I didn't watch it any more and it was just taking up space (if I want to watch a TV show, I do it on the PC, which has a decently large screen, and no commercials). Due to the weird pricing at Comcast, it's cheaper to have Internet + basic cable TV than to have just Internet, so I still have TV service, even though I don't have anything to plug into the cable at the moment.

  80. I don't think its real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Captcha never works. I think they're harvesting facebook data. Also: Google cache on the page has a link called "Don't take it seriously"
    Popup with this:
    Don't take it seriously

    The privacy policy, the contact us page — it’s all a joke. We came up with the idea of building a crawler like this and keeping the maintenance price under $300 a month. There was only one way to prove our theory worked — to implement it in practice. So we did. Now, we find ourselves with a big crawler. We knew what it did but we didn’t know how to use it. So we decided to make a joke out of it. That’s the beauty of jokes — you can make them out of anything.

    However, if you have a better idea — don’t hesitate to contact us.

    Additionally, the captcha code is:
    success: function(data){
            if(data=='OK') location.href='/';
    So if the data matches, it just reloads the page.

    1. Re:I don't think its real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The callback to both ajax requests (facebook and captcha) both redirect to '/'. In fact any requests just get redirected to the index page w/ the FB/captcha stuff... Either the site is simply a way to harvest facebook data or they are still implementing the human-test. I checked out the page at work but wanted to do a little browsing at home.. Oh well.

  81. Captcha'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And on top of it being by far the most frustrating one I've ever had to do, it doesn't actually work.
    Or you could sign in with facebook, but I honestly don't care enough to make one.

  82. Plausible deniability by 0dugo0 · · Score: 1

    IIRC opentorrent trackers also feed random IPs to make exactly these kind of practices unreliable.

  83. I should be on their most wanted list... by issicus · · Score: 0

    IP addresses change. not everyone has a static ip.

  84. Correction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It didn't get slashdotted.. just can't let boss see those logs.

  85. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now everyone will know I've downloaded !
    My captcha here was squirm. Do ho ho.

  86. whois youhavedownloaded.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The domain was created a month and half ago by XMLSHOP, LLC. Wonder what they do .......

    http://www.xmlshop.com/

    Registrant:
       XMLSHOP LLC

       Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
       Domain Name: YOUHAVEDOWNLOADED.COM
          Created on: 23-Oct-11
          Expires on: 23-Oct-13
          Last Updated on: 22-Nov-11

  87. Isn't "only" hyperbole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, plenty of things have fallen into the public domain and have been forgotten. The movie had an appeal that went beyond being free for the station. I mean what use would it have been if it garnered no viewers?

    As for being "horrible", this is an opinion. Not fact.

  88. site works by Nyder · · Score: 1

    It says I downloaded Amsterdam Heavy, which oddly enough, I did.

    It didn't get though:

    The weird world of blowfly
    The man on the train
    Boy Wonder
    Drive

    which i downloaded at the same time.

    Oh, it calls me a pirate also, totally cool.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  89. Somewhat legit by Random5 · · Score: 1

    Just want to confirm that I checked my current home IP, it has four entries, two of which are definitely episodes I downloaded, two are someone else's listed from a previous month. I think it's safe to say they're 'legit' insofar as they're recording actual activity and querying it honestly at least some of the time.

  90. EWWWW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow i checked this site out and it called me a pirate for downloading music, Music that i don't even like or even knew existed and according to their logs i have like 4 albums worth of it.

  91. My ISP is Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, my ISP sucks, but in such a way, that it's great for stuff like this.

    Every last one of us users is squirreled behind a poorly checked single public-facing IP. It keeps very few, if any logs (having people who work there that can actually see the proof of this), and when I pull my IP up on their site, it's chock full of other pirates such as myself downloading all sorts of stuff I've never seen/herd of.

    I get to be anonymous, and I get to see what my 'neighbors' pirate! Win/win!

  92. Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, don't get a Facebook account.

  93. It's a joke by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1
    From the site: "Don't take it seriously

    The privacy policy, the contact us page — it’s all a joke. We came up with the idea of building a crawler like this and keeping the maintenance price under $300 a month. There was only one way to prove our theory worked — to implement it in practice. So we did. Now, we find ourselves with a big crawler. We knew what it did but we didn’t know how to use it. So we decided to make a joke out of it. That’s the beauty of jokes — you can make them out of anything."

    Calm down, people. It'll get funny when the RIAA subpoenas them for their database.

    --
    bah.
  94. Let 'em... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I don't use torrents and have 0 illegal downloads. All my music, movies, and software is 100% legally paid for...

    ...So, they try anything: Not only will they be heavily disappointed, but will be at the receiving end of a nice counter-suit as well!

  95. Uncovered hypocrisy by esocid · · Score: 1
    https://torrentfreak.com/busted-bittorrent-pirates-at-sony-universal-and-fox-111213/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Torrentfreak+(Torrentfreak)
    Torrentfreak found some juicy hypocrisy going on:

    First up is Sony Pictures Entertainment. As shown below, on this single IP-address alone a wide variety of music and movies have been downloaded. And this is probably just the tip of the iceberg, as YouHaveDownloaded only tracks about 20% of all public BitTorrent downloads. Another Hollywood studio where it’s not uncommon to download music, TV-shows and movies is NBC Universal. The employee(s) behind one of the IP-addresses at the Fort Lauderdale office in Florida downloaded the first season of ‘Game of Thrones,’ some trance music, a DVD of ‘Cowboys and Aliens’, and much more. And then there are the fine upstanding people at Fox Entertainment checking out the work of a competing studio. Perhaps downloading ‘Super 8 can be branded as “market research,” but in this instance actually paying for the DVD might be more appropriate. After all, when Fox notices that one of their own movies has leaked online they quickly contact the FBI to get the offender jailed. Ouch.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  96. Doesn't anybody rummage around? by frrrp · · Score: 1
    Bottom left - http://www.youhavedownloaded.com/#seriously

    Don't take it seriously The privacy policy, the contact us page — it’s all a joke. We came up with the idea of building a crawler like this and keeping the maintenance price under $300 a month. There was only one way to prove our theory worked — to implement it in practice. So we did. Now, we find ourselves with a big crawler. We knew what it did but we didn’t know how to use it. So we decided to make a joke out of it. That’s the beauty of jokes — you can make them out of anything. However, if you have a better idea — don’t hesitate to contact us.

    --
    smilies are for reetards