did you do the random things, or you just "knew" that you had done them somehow? While dreaming, you accept as good facts that can't possibly be true. And know things that you can't know. So, having the knowledge that you have done something does not imply that you actually did it while dreaming.
Please explain to me why is so worrying about ice flocks melting in the poles. When I was a kid I remember that in science class we put an ice cube in a cup and filled it with water up to the rim. Even when part of the ice cube was outside the cup, once it melted the water did not spill because ice is much less dense than water. So, how would the poles melting affect the global oceanic levels?
I realize something so obvious would already have occurred to scientists, that's why I'm asking which is the little fact that I'm missing. I think that even the fact that the south pole ice cap is earth-based (as opposed to floating on the ocean) would not matter, considering that 3/4 of Earth's surface is water (and, the first lands to be flooded would be Antarctica's themselves, giving more liquid surface again)
Someone please enlighten me
I don't think so. The protein helps you protect from cancer, but also causes your death years later, when it accumulates (or oxides you, or whatever) too much
It is not a permissions problem. They probably exhausted their bandwidth allotment due to the./'ing and the server refuses to serve more pages to avoid falling on its knees.
Do you REALLY think they wouldn't have realized by now if someone had screwed the permissions on ALL the files??
So, finally Linux will incorporate Digital Rights Management?
Interesting... it's GPL'd I suppose...
However, is it possible to circumvent it by not using XFree? You seem to imply that
(Note for the humor impaired: yeah I'm just joking. Go ahead and mod me offtopic, you know you need it! indulge yourself)
yeah sure! what adds value to BeIA is it's Hardware Abstraction Layer (so to speak), the core BeOS was difficult to port over x86 from the PPC. Once you have a layer that allows you to run equally on most archs (say, StrongARM or MIPS) you can port it without much difficult. That part (as far as I knew) is specific to BeIA, BeOS is still much attached to the x86. But, since you would be developing apps and not drivers, you could easily develop on BeOS for the BeIA without much trouble.
A competitor who would try to replicate the system, however, would have a hard time doing so...
I remember, back in the days of BeOS R3 and 4.5, to have visited a site called the Artillion, put up by William Bull, the graphic artist who made the icons for the BeOS and much of its widgets. The last thing I know is he went to QNX, and presumably has done work on Photon's graphics there. Any slashdotter at QNX who can shed some light?
I for one liked very much the graphics...
Because what Palm wants is the BeIA platform, not the PC desktop. And, having a freely available development environment for the BeIA won't hurt Palm's interests on this respect. They could allow you to freely develop on the BeOS and then charge you for licensing your soft for the BeIA
well, they can refrain from posting the licenses so that the community does not flame the companies. But what is stopping you from showing us your license?
So, suppose I write a full development toolchain. Then, you use it to make some software. Are you making a commercial use of my kit? Should I only see money if your users are making money with your software?
I can verify it. My company is involved in some content development for AOL Avant, and we received and early propotype last year and the final version just last week. When you type about: in the URL box, it appears the usual about page found on mozilla (the prototype's version was M18, I think)
Well the car could catch fire or something like that. I don't think the owner would mind. And, I understand that this would still be illegal, but why isn't illegal for them?
Slashdot Mirror
did you do the random things, or you just "knew" that you had done them somehow? While dreaming, you accept as good facts that can't possibly be true. And know things that you can't know. So, having the knowledge that you have done something does not imply that you actually did it while dreaming.
don't believe everything you see in movies. Everyone I know dreams in "real time".
Please explain to me why is so worrying about ice flocks melting in the poles. When I was a kid I remember that in science class we put an ice cube in a cup and filled it with water up to the rim. Even when part of the ice cube was outside the cup, once it melted the water did not spill because ice is much less dense than water. So, how would the poles melting affect the global oceanic levels?
I realize something so obvious would already have occurred to scientists, that's why I'm asking which is the little fact that I'm missing. I think that even the fact that the south pole ice cap is earth-based (as opposed to floating on the ocean) would not matter, considering that 3/4 of Earth's surface is water (and, the first lands to be flooded would be Antarctica's themselves, giving more liquid surface again)
Someone please enlighten me
I don't think so. The protein helps you protect from cancer, but also causes your death years later, when it accumulates (or oxides you, or whatever) too much
It is not a permissions problem. They probably exhausted their bandwidth allotment due to the ./'ing and the server refuses to serve more pages to avoid falling on its knees.
Do you REALLY think they wouldn't have realized by now if someone had screwed the permissions on ALL the files??
So does that mean there are only 174 geeks cooler than I?
Of course! I knew there had to be a reason for those annoying chicks to hang around here...
Oh! you spoiled the fun for me!
So, finally Linux will incorporate Digital Rights Management?
Interesting... it's GPL'd I suppose...
However, is it possible to circumvent it by not using XFree? You seem to imply that
(Note for the humor impaired: yeah I'm just joking. Go ahead and mod me offtopic, you know you need it! indulge yourself)
yeah sure! what adds value to BeIA is it's Hardware Abstraction Layer (so to speak), the core BeOS was difficult to port over x86 from the PPC. Once you have a layer that allows you to run equally on most archs (say, StrongARM or MIPS) you can port it without much difficult. That part (as far as I knew) is specific to BeIA, BeOS is still much attached to the x86. But, since you would be developing apps and not drivers, you could easily develop on BeOS for the BeIA without much trouble.
A competitor who would try to replicate the system, however, would have a hard time doing so...
I remember, back in the days of BeOS R3 and 4.5, to have visited a site called the Artillion, put up by William Bull, the graphic artist who made the icons for the BeOS and much of its widgets. The last thing I know is he went to QNX, and presumably has done work on Photon's graphics there. Any slashdotter at QNX who can shed some light?
I for one liked very much the graphics...
Because what Palm wants is the BeIA platform, not the PC desktop. And, having a freely available development environment for the BeIA won't hurt Palm's interests on this respect. They could allow you to freely develop on the BeOS and then charge you for licensing your soft for the BeIA
too bad larry niven thought about it too
well, they can refrain from posting the licenses so that the community does not flame the companies. But what is stopping you from showing us your license?
But if you release it expecting to get paid, you are making a commercial use of it, even if you don't see a penny. Or at least, that is my train.
So, suppose I write a full development toolchain. Then, you use it to make some software. Are you making a commercial use of my kit? Should I only see money if your users are making money with your software?
and then, there is also roxxen, aolwebserver...
And adding to the parent, I think SmallTalk already had a VM (not sure though)
Writing a Haiku :)
in seventeen syllables
is very easy
Yes, my site is undergoing a serious tomcat 4 reconfiguration :/ If you check the un-maintained carotena.net/victor you can glimpse more info
FYI, we are based in Barcelona. Some of the other partners are based in Madrid and Mallorca, though
I can verify it. My company is involved in some content development for AOL Avant, and we received and early propotype last year and the final version just last week. When you type about: in the URL box, it appears the usual about page found on mozilla (the prototype's version was M18, I think)
Tarzan producing a buffer overflow. How long before a script kiddie rips its yell into an mp3?
I completely agree. SP6a breaks MS Message Queue, for example. It's been a pain in the ass :/
Well the car could catch fire or something like that. I don't think the owner would mind. And, I understand that this would still be illegal, but why isn't illegal for them?
Well I don't mind worms avoiding my IP's :)