Let's not forget that Intel did release a 64-bit processor before AMD. Who can blame them for trying to break away from an instruction set that we've been using since cavemen were carving computers out of stone. It's not their fault that everybody wanted to stick with x86. So now to appease the general public they are forced to beat that dead horse one more time. In fact Intel should be lauded for being compatible and not trying to monopolize the 64-bit market.
Slashdot Mirror
I for one, welcome our new informational indexing masters.
Stand on the roof and yell very loudly.
(Provided, of course, that you're not heavy enough to break the glass.)
This is the first time I've heard of a company complaining about free advertising.
BTW. My favorite video games are also ummm.. "Melda" and er... "Zetroid".
I think this is all an evil subliminal ploy by Del Monte.
Am I the only one craving a fruit salad after reading the article?
Next weeks software releases: SysMango with a side of KiwiX.
Running MacOS using CherryOS on Windows using VMWare on FreeBSD using Linux binary compatibility ...on a dead badger!
Let's not forget that Intel did release a 64-bit processor before AMD. Who can blame them for trying to break away from an instruction set that we've been using since cavemen were carving computers out of stone. It's not their fault that everybody wanted to stick with x86. So now to appease the general public they are forced to beat that dead horse one more time. In fact Intel should be lauded for being compatible and not trying to monopolize the 64-bit market.