I have Knapster and one can enter servers in it. For windows there is a great program called MyNapster (aka File Navigator.)It allows one to connect to more then one server, thus getting around the 100 limit. Is there such a thing for the Linux world?
I have no problems with Adam Smith. He had some good ideas. Just like Communists never practiced it the way Marx spelled it out we do not practice Captialism the way Adam Smith said. For a true free market economy high amounts of competition is necesary to form the "invisible hand" that controls the price of items. Today there are less and less companies that are getting bigger and bigger. Look at what happening to gasoline prices in the midwest! They certainly are not rational prices (I actually think high gas prices is a good thing, but it should go to public transportation and not be lining the pockets of corportations).
Remember, their beef (no pun intended) was with being ruled without representation by some braindead aristocratic loser thousands of miles away. The twit Brits believed that just because his father was King so should his son be king. How insane is that? What qualifications does he have? That's not a way to rule a country. You need democratically elected representatives to voice the opinion of the majority of the nation!
Thats exactly what the artical is saying! France has the right to live out of the rule of the corporate america. And take a look at American "democracy" these days. America is one of the oldest democracies thats still around and this is something to be pround of. But its age shows. We americans live under a plutocracy, where third parties can not have a voice. Other newer democracies are not like this! Why is it that we are the richest nation in the world but second only to Mexico in poverty in industrialized nations?
And now organizations like the WTO take American sovernity. Check out this link from a conservative legistlator complaining about the WTO for those reasons.
Would the "Cultural revolution" really be counted as unreligious? I'm mean there athiest, so they have blinded faith in it just like other religions (I'm anogistic myself) Suppose I can't argue with the killings by Stalin (which I assume goes under the "Russian Revolution" term) sense most of them were for polictically reasons. However, I think that a religion (I define religion in the faith of something relating to the otherwise unexplainable) of some kind is just part of human nature so it is true that religions have led to more violence for the same reason that humans have led to more violence.
Slashdot Mirror
I have Knapster and one can enter servers in it. For windows there is a great program called MyNapster (aka File Navigator.)It allows one to connect to more then one server, thus getting around the 100 limit. Is there such a thing for the Linux world?
Remember, their beef (no pun intended) was with being ruled without representation by some braindead aristocratic loser thousands of miles away. The twit Brits believed that just because his father was King so should his son be king. How insane is that? What qualifications does he have? That's not a way to rule a country. You need democratically elected representatives to voice the opinion of the majority of the nation!
Thats exactly what the artical is saying! France has the right to live out of the rule of the corporate america. And take a look at American "democracy" these days. America is one of the oldest democracies thats still around and this is something to be pround of. But its age shows. We americans live under a plutocracy, where third parties can not have a voice. Other newer democracies are not like this! Why is it that we are the richest nation in the world but second only to Mexico in poverty in industrialized nations?
And now organizations like the WTO take American sovernity. Check out this link from a conservative legistlator complaining about the WTO for those reasons.
Would the "Cultural revolution" really be counted as unreligious? I'm mean there athiest, so they have blinded faith in it just like other religions (I'm anogistic myself)
Suppose I can't argue with the killings by Stalin (which I assume goes under the "Russian Revolution" term) sense most of them were for polictically reasons.
However, I think that a religion (I define religion in the faith of something relating to the otherwise unexplainable) of some kind is just part of human nature so it is true that
religions have led to more violence for the same reason that humans have led to more violence.
Ian