And here is a follow up from the state making it clear that Leighann was not in violation of the law.
“This particular incidence of candy possession as it has been reported by KHOU-TV would not be considered a violation of the state or federal nutrition program and therefore would not have jeopardized your district’s food service funding.”
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds like a Freudian slip. Got something to tell us about your love for children?
STEVE HOLT!
I think the penis game is more appropriate here...
And here is a follow up from the state making it clear that Leighann was not in violation of the law.
“This particular incidence of candy possession as it has been reported by KHOU-TV would not be considered a violation of the state or federal nutrition program and therefore would not have jeopardized your district’s food service funding.”