No. Congress has the power to have a patent system, but it's not a mandate. They could choose to end the patent system. The real stumbling block to abolition or even reform is a number of international treaties that tie our hands on the matter.
A statute is trumped by the first amendment if they conflict, and the statute in question seems to require pretty direct advocacy. This wouldn't even pass the sniff test if Muslims had been the victims of a riot, so it certainly wouldn't apply in this case.
Execution should be reserved for real crimes that actually threaten the US, like leaking the plans for an atomic bomb to the USSR. Manning should be given a medal, if anything.
The study, conducted at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and the University of Kansas Medical Center, selected 120 popular food and non-food brands, including McDonald's and Rice Krispies, and BMW and FedEx.
Were there brands that kids would care about shown as well, or just brands that they happen to know? I don't really see FedEx lighting up the pleasure center in a kid's brain, but Toys'R'Us or Mattel might. Other listed logos from the study are the Target bulls-eye and the Energizer Bunny. I might expect the bunny to cause a little bit of pleasure, but the cuteness of bunnies is balanced with the boringness of batteries.
They do if they are competently run and member owned. In such a case, the utility doesn't make money. The purpose of the utility is thus getting the best cost-benefit results. This is possibly most prevalent with water utilities, who often can't feasibly increase their capacity beyond a certain point without enormous costs.
It doesn't appear to be on Wikipedia. Also, given that Hollywood is based there, I'm quite sure it's not a right-to-work state. There are lots of film-related guilds and unions there, after all.
I suspect it's not a technical problem, but rather, a we-hate-google problem. As for why you need trickery to run it, it's probably related to the software being default software that was removed with the update.
This article seems to be lacking important details, such as what percentage of this biomass is human cultivated. If say, 95% of the biomass in 1982 was wild plant growth, then even if we had quadrupled the 5% of human cultivated biomass with no losses elsewhere, then we'd only be at 115% of the 1982 biomass. And this isn't considering the losses of biomass due to land development and such.
Yes, but whether or not that leads to a per-unit loss is a function of the number of sales times the profit per sale. It can't be a true loss leader because it's not a loss at a high enough volume, and it doesn't really lead to sales of another product that is more profitable for MS.
How can it be a loss leader, though? It's software, and ASUS probably does the actual copying of images onto those machines. The cost to MS is limited to the paltry sum they pay for codec patent licenses and such.
My experience seems to be that the situation is quite different. Europeans seem to be more often concerned that that Arabs are 'taking over', while from an American perspective, it's such a laughably small minority that we are amused that you even noticed them.
The camera watching cameras are an easy target, and I don't think people really buy the safety crap anymore. Its a money making teacher and we all know it
Life in the US is fucking GREAT. Not perfect, no place is, but if you think things are so terrible, you have absolutely no idea what the rest of the world is like.
The rest of the world doesn't matter, and it's idiotic to think that in any way justifies this. I don't care if the rest of the world makes it mandatory to be punched in the face 3 hours a day, that doesn't make warrantless wiretaps okay. The same goes for the US in the past. Society doesn't progress by being complacent with injustice. Even when we grow by leap and bounds, we should not be satisfied, but instead, keep striving forward, eternally vigilant.
I would think that such a policy could happen. In a less negative light, let's say that we ended the war on drugs and at least decriminalized a large number of substances. Would granting them amnesty/pardon be unconstitutional? I don't think so. However, wiretaps are searches, so Congress can't actually authorize them.
Slashdot Mirror
No. Congress has the power to have a patent system, but it's not a mandate. They could choose to end the patent system. The real stumbling block to abolition or even reform is a number of international treaties that tie our hands on the matter.
Freedom of speech protects unpopular speech. You don't need freedom of speech to protect popular statements without controversy.
A statute is trumped by the first amendment if they conflict, and the statute in question seems to require pretty direct advocacy. This wouldn't even pass the sniff test if Muslims had been the victims of a riot, so it certainly wouldn't apply in this case.
Execution should be reserved for real crimes that actually threaten the US, like leaking the plans for an atomic bomb to the USSR. Manning should be given a medal, if anything.
"Clockwork orange treatment" means an extreme form of aversion therapy. That's not in any applicable here.
A sedentary lifestyle is a major factor in obesity.
Were there brands that kids would care about shown as well, or just brands that they happen to know? I don't really see FedEx lighting up the pleasure center in a kid's brain, but Toys'R'Us or Mattel might. Other listed logos from the study are the Target bulls-eye and the Energizer Bunny. I might expect the bunny to cause a little bit of pleasure, but the cuteness of bunnies is balanced with the boringness of batteries.
They do if they are competently run and member owned. In such a case, the utility doesn't make money. The purpose of the utility is thus getting the best cost-benefit results. This is possibly most prevalent with water utilities, who often can't feasibly increase their capacity beyond a certain point without enormous costs.
At the very least, they could have mined themselves some bitcoins.
It doesn't appear to be on Wikipedia. Also, given that Hollywood is based there, I'm quite sure it's not a right-to-work state. There are lots of film-related guilds and unions there, after all.
I suspect it's not a technical problem, but rather, a we-hate-google problem. As for why you need trickery to run it, it's probably related to the software being default software that was removed with the update.
This article seems to be lacking important details, such as what percentage of this biomass is human cultivated. If say, 95% of the biomass in 1982 was wild plant growth, then even if we had quadrupled the 5% of human cultivated biomass with no losses elsewhere, then we'd only be at 115% of the 1982 biomass. And this isn't considering the losses of biomass due to land development and such.
Who says any of those do? For years, I didn't use an email address with my real name attached.
Imagine a teenager clicking "I AM 18" on a porn site. Every pubescent male minor in the country has done that. Is that 'wire fraud' too?
Unjust laws should not be followed. In many cases, obeying an unjust law is itself unjust or unethical.
angry 12 year olds can be right occasionally, although I wouldn't say this is such an instance.
Yes, but whether or not that leads to a per-unit loss is a function of the number of sales times the profit per sale. It can't be a true loss leader because it's not a loss at a high enough volume, and it doesn't really lead to sales of another product that is more profitable for MS.
How can it be a loss leader, though? It's software, and ASUS probably does the actual copying of images onto those machines. The cost to MS is limited to the paltry sum they pay for codec patent licenses and such.
My experience seems to be that the situation is quite different. Europeans seem to be more often concerned that that Arabs are 'taking over', while from an American perspective, it's such a laughably small minority that we are amused that you even noticed them.
It is unethical to obey censorship laws, so ignoring those particular laws is the right thing to do.
So, they can say whatever they want, they just can't be heard?
The camera watching cameras are an easy target, and I don't think people really buy the safety crap anymore. Its a money making teacher and we all know it
I don't see a way to easily challenge it on those grounds. Who would even have standing to bring a suit against such a law?
The rest of the world doesn't matter, and it's idiotic to think that in any way justifies this. I don't care if the rest of the world makes it mandatory to be punched in the face 3 hours a day, that doesn't make warrantless wiretaps okay. The same goes for the US in the past. Society doesn't progress by being complacent with injustice. Even when we grow by leap and bounds, we should not be satisfied, but instead, keep striving forward, eternally vigilant.
I would think that such a policy could happen. In a less negative light, let's say that we ended the war on drugs and at least decriminalized a large number of substances. Would granting them amnesty/pardon be unconstitutional? I don't think so. However, wiretaps are searches, so Congress can't actually authorize them.