There is an easy fix for this. Suing the carrier into oblivion for not unlocking devices they no longer support, so that the owners of those devices can get support from other sources (like CyanogenMod) .
The ONLY thing these people understand is economic costs, make it expensive to not support devices, but keep them under lock and key.
Fascism is statism, just like Communism, Nazism, Socialism and modern Americanism. The differences are only on emphasis, not the rights of the state over the people.
Right, because the cause for those bread lines is NEVER in question. In this case, he was talking about a socialism based country that couldn't produce enough food, because socialism. But hey, next time we'll get this socialist thing right.
If you're going to be pedantic, at least be correct. The ACT of blocking traffic itself was an act of aggression.
Going to the store is not an act of aggression, because you're not preventing anyone from anything. Blocking public access is an act of aggression. It is willful and disruptive, which was the point of the protest. The point of going to a store is to buy groceries. I am guessing you're kind of special snowflake
Everyone voting IS a show of force. Luckily we live in a Republic and vote for representatives. Two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner. I am the well armed sheep contesting the vote.
HTTPS isn't easily broken into. That is the point of it. Under the right circumstances, a man in the middle MIGHT be able to decrypt the steam. However, those cases are usually easy to identify with some additional tools.
With HTTPS, the packets appear to contain noise, and it requires keys to unlock to see what is going on, and that usually triggers alarms built in.
HTTP is like a post card, anyone, anywhere can read it. HTTPS is like a sealed envelope, which remains sealed until delivery, and attempts to unseal it are difficult to pull off without seeing the envelope has been tampered with. The better the encryption, the harder it is to open.
I would not call blocking entrance to a public building "peaceful" regardless of who or why it was being done. It is a "show of force" and a threat to everyone else. It is intimidation and threatening.
Peaceful Protests don't disrupt anyone, and I support them. Blocking bridges and buildings is not "peaceful". That act is by definition an act of aggression. And not just "micro aggression" either.
If you have every opportunity to remove yourself from a situation, and don't, that doesn't make you a victim. And you cheapen what it means to be a REAL victim.
protestors were sitting down and not threatening anyone
Blocking public access is not peaceful nor is it non-aggressive . They may not be violent in action, but their intent is an act of violence. To remove them would threaten safety of everyone involved.
So, you'd support Anti Abortion protestors blocking access to abortion clinics? You'd protest the police doing anything to stop them? You'd call the police "Brownshirt Nazi's" when they pepper sprayed the abortion protesters?
Somehow, I doubt the Occupy people would be consistent.
Being warned about the consequences of continued civil disobedience is a Nazi tactic? If you want to protest, protest, If you want to protest in the face of being maced, and you continue to protest, and get maced, it is not the fault of the "NAZI" brownshirts.
In fact, if I punched one of those poor snowflakes to get them out of my way so I could enter a public building, I am 100% sure they would run crying to those very same "brownshirt nazi's" to have me arrested.
Have sympathy for their cause all you want, but man up and deal with the consequences like an adult.
Subjective viewpoint. You're flat out denying the OTHER students (not sitting/blocking) exist or are otherwise irrelevant to the entirety of the situation. Can you please explain how these others are "not students" and "Not surrounding" the police? Are you 100% sure there was NO protesting student not sitting? Can you tell me with 100% certainty that the other "standing" students were just "innocent bystanders" and not part of the protest?
The problem is, you want to minimize the situation, make it seem more unreasonable, just to make your cause look less douchie.
I have NO Problem with protesters getting pepper sprayed, after being warned, repeatedly. THEY chose not to comply, and deserve the consequences, regardless of the cause they were protesting for. These are the same kinds of people who are offended by chalk, the poor snowflakes.
My view is something along the lines of "Hey we're doing anti-social stuff and causing problems being general assholes for a cause (we sometimes can't articulate, but that is besides the point)" The problem is, most of these people are precious snowflakes that when push becomes shove they somehow want to cry victimhood status for sympathy.
And as long as we grant them that, they will never cease being dickheads for a cause. They will block a highway with their "protests" causing harm to thousands of other people, and expecting no reprisals.
Left-wing protesters get rights that others do not. They can block a highway (and disrupt thousands of innocent people) , and your a hero. But block an Abortion Clinic and you're "anti woman" hater.
I wonder if the left really understands their own hypocrisy.
You can always see the payload. Packets are not private.
The payload is either encrypted or not. If it isn't encrypted, it is nothing more than a postcard in the mail; anyone can read it, but rarely is it interesting enough to even care.
Encrypted packets like https are not normally visible. Man in the middle attacks can make them just as visible as a postcard. And with other techniques it might be possible to crack open the encryption (weak).
Once viewable, you can break apart a packet, insert whatever you want into them, and send them on the way. In this case, they inserted ads into web requests (via html) so that the ads appeared to be served by the website, but were instead served by their own server.
Editorial, there is no reason to run HTTP and not HTTPS for your website traffic. If you can't buy a cert, then you can't really afford to have a website.
What you said isn't at odds to what I said. I didn't say who did the desoldering or the brute attack, I just said how it was done. And quite frankly it doesn't matter "who" did it, but the how.
Actually, if you look deeper into the numbers, the actuals are really bad.
The March jobs report, also released earlier this month, showed employers added 215,000 workers to payrolls after a 245,000 February advance, while the jobless rate edged up to 5 percent as more people entered the labor force.
The jobs added was MUCH lower, and yet Unemployment fell substantially. This simply means that more people dropped off the unemployment rolls without finding work.
Also, look for the revisions in a couple months that make it worse than initially reported. In short, if you believe the BS coming out in this report, I want whatever you're smoking
Copies, two local, one remote Locations, geographically distinct Formats Natural, Raw, compress etc Mediums, SATA, USB, Tape, SAN manufacturer etc.
By Minimum I mean bare minimum. the reality is, there should be cascading copies being made, and Long Term Arching able to restore to a set point in time. For Copies you'll need at least three, more likely more version (date specific). You should separate your copies geographically so that when California gets the big one, or Hurricane Global Warming washes eastern seaboard clean or Tsunami wipes out the Pacific Rim, you can resume business relatively quickly somewhere else. Different formats so that you can get the data you need in a way that makes it easy. You'll want the important parts of the SQL database in a non-database (XLS) format. And you'll want to isolate yourself from medium failures, a date bug in SAN, or Trying to find a floppy drive (old school) to put the floppy in.
The problem with this guy, was that he was too cocky and didn't have proper backups. IMHO if he did "Live > Local Backup > Offsite Backup he would have been fine. You backup your live data locally, and then make a copy of that backup to remote / offsite. Three copies, two locations, two media, two formats. Done
it exists because the inability of services to compete for last mile access customers right now.
Correct. But that is largely due to Franchise agreements that restrict competition for that last mile. Those agreements served their purpose during the early periods where CATV didn't offer but one service (TV). Now you have it competing with TriplePlay style services (Internet, Voice, TV). And many of these are irrelevant once you realize that two of the three services (perhaps all three) are just Internet.
Slashdot Mirror
There is an easy fix for this. Suing the carrier into oblivion for not unlocking devices they no longer support, so that the owners of those devices can get support from other sources (like CyanogenMod) .
The ONLY thing these people understand is economic costs, make it expensive to not support devices, but keep them under lock and key.
Fascism is statism, just like Communism, Nazism, Socialism and modern Americanism. The differences are only on emphasis, not the rights of the state over the people.
Right, because the cause for those bread lines is NEVER in question. In this case, he was talking about a socialism based country that couldn't produce enough food, because socialism. But hey, next time we'll get this socialist thing right.
Socialism leads to bread lines, and only rich can afford food. Um maybe Socialism leads to everyone being poor?
Oh right, because NEXT time, we'll have all the bugs out of socialism
It was a walking path
That is enough. You admitted the problem.
1) they made their point
2) they were told to stop blocking the road
3) they were warned of the consequences
Temper tantrums gets spankings. But these precious snowflakes never learned that lesson.
Did any protestor strike an officer?
Did any officer strike a protester? No!
If you're going to be pedantic, at least be correct. The ACT of blocking traffic itself was an act of aggression.
Going to the store is not an act of aggression, because you're not preventing anyone from anything. Blocking public access is an act of aggression. It is willful and disruptive, which was the point of the protest. The point of going to a store is to buy groceries. I am guessing you're kind of special snowflake
Everyone voting IS a show of force. Luckily we live in a Republic and vote for representatives. Two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner. I am the well armed sheep contesting the vote.
HTTPS isn't easily broken into. That is the point of it. Under the right circumstances, a man in the middle MIGHT be able to decrypt the steam. However, those cases are usually easy to identify with some additional tools.
With HTTPS, the packets appear to contain noise, and it requires keys to unlock to see what is going on, and that usually triggers alarms built in.
HTTP is like a post card, anyone, anywhere can read it. HTTPS is like a sealed envelope, which remains sealed until delivery, and attempts to unseal it are difficult to pull off without seeing the envelope has been tampered with. The better the encryption, the harder it is to open.
What is the incentive to work, if everything you need is given to you by the sweat of others?
it is a sad state when people are willing to fight and die for the produce of others, but not their own self worth.
That's best done via threats, empty promises and reducing the number of available jobs while increasing the number of people.
Please don't vote, because I suspect you'll be voting for Bernie, who views success as failure, and failures as success.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
How anyone can vote for him after watching that is beyond me.
I would not call blocking entrance to a public building "peaceful" regardless of who or why it was being done. It is a "show of force" and a threat to everyone else. It is intimidation and threatening.
Peaceful Protests don't disrupt anyone, and I support them. Blocking bridges and buildings is not "peaceful". That act is by definition an act of aggression. And not just "micro aggression" either.
If you have every opportunity to remove yourself from a situation, and don't, that doesn't make you a victim. And you cheapen what it means to be a REAL victim.
Multiple students had the chance to leave and not be pepper sprayed, and not one of them stopped what they were doing.
protestors were sitting down and not threatening anyone
Blocking public access is not peaceful nor is it non-aggressive . They may not be violent in action, but their intent is an act of violence. To remove them would threaten safety of everyone involved.
So, you'd support Anti Abortion protestors blocking access to abortion clinics? You'd protest the police doing anything to stop them? You'd call the police "Brownshirt Nazi's" when they pepper sprayed the abortion protesters?
Somehow, I doubt the Occupy people would be consistent.
Being warned about the consequences of continued civil disobedience is a Nazi tactic? If you want to protest, protest, If you want to protest in the face of being maced, and you continue to protest, and get maced, it is not the fault of the "NAZI" brownshirts.
In fact, if I punched one of those poor snowflakes to get them out of my way so I could enter a public building, I am 100% sure they would run crying to those very same "brownshirt nazi's" to have me arrested.
Have sympathy for their cause all you want, but man up and deal with the consequences like an adult.
Subjective viewpoint. You're flat out denying the OTHER students (not sitting/blocking) exist or are otherwise irrelevant to the entirety of the situation. Can you please explain how these others are "not students" and "Not surrounding" the police? Are you 100% sure there was NO protesting student not sitting? Can you tell me with 100% certainty that the other "standing" students were just "innocent bystanders" and not part of the protest?
The problem is, you want to minimize the situation, make it seem more unreasonable, just to make your cause look less douchie.
I have NO Problem with protesters getting pepper sprayed, after being warned, repeatedly. THEY chose not to comply, and deserve the consequences, regardless of the cause they were protesting for. These are the same kinds of people who are offended by chalk, the poor snowflakes.
My view is something along the lines of "Hey we're doing anti-social stuff and causing problems being general assholes for a cause (we sometimes can't articulate, but that is besides the point)" The problem is, most of these people are precious snowflakes that when push becomes shove they somehow want to cry victimhood status for sympathy.
And as long as we grant them that, they will never cease being dickheads for a cause. They will block a highway with their "protests" causing harm to thousands of other people, and expecting no reprisals.
Left-wing protesters get rights that others do not. They can block a highway (and disrupt thousands of innocent people) , and your a hero. But block an Abortion Clinic and you're "anti woman" hater.
I wonder if the left really understands their own hypocrisy.
You can always see the payload. Packets are not private.
The payload is either encrypted or not. If it isn't encrypted, it is nothing more than a postcard in the mail; anyone can read it, but rarely is it interesting enough to even care.
Encrypted packets like https are not normally visible. Man in the middle attacks can make them just as visible as a postcard. And with other techniques it might be possible to crack open the encryption (weak).
Once viewable, you can break apart a packet, insert whatever you want into them, and send them on the way. In this case, they inserted ads into web requests (via html) so that the ads appeared to be served by the website, but were instead served by their own server.
Editorial, there is no reason to run HTTP and not HTTPS for your website traffic. If you can't buy a cert, then you can't really afford to have a website.
You cannot assume washed hands. You can only assume something is being inserted into the air stream.
http://images-cdn.9gag.com/pho...
Woosh
What you said isn't at odds to what I said. I didn't say who did the desoldering or the brute attack, I just said how it was done. And quite frankly it doesn't matter "who" did it, but the how.
Actually, if you look deeper into the numbers, the actuals are really bad.
The March jobs report, also released earlier this month, showed employers added 215,000 workers to payrolls after a 245,000 February advance, while the jobless rate edged up to 5 percent as more people entered the labor force.
The jobs added was MUCH lower, and yet Unemployment fell substantially. This simply means that more people dropped off the unemployment rolls without finding work.
Also, look for the revisions in a couple months that make it worse than initially reported. In short, if you believe the BS coming out in this report, I want whatever you're smoking
Yeah, it is fantastic! NO unemployment at all! WOOT
Minimums:
3 Copies
2 Locations
2 Formats
2 Mediums
Copies, two local, one remote
Locations, geographically distinct
Formats Natural, Raw, compress etc
Mediums, SATA, USB, Tape, SAN manufacturer etc.
By Minimum I mean bare minimum. the reality is, there should be cascading copies being made, and Long Term Arching able to restore to a set point in time. For Copies you'll need at least three, more likely more version (date specific). You should separate your copies geographically so that when California gets the big one, or Hurricane Global Warming washes eastern seaboard clean or Tsunami wipes out the Pacific Rim, you can resume business relatively quickly somewhere else. Different formats so that you can get the data you need in a way that makes it easy. You'll want the important parts of the SQL database in a non-database (XLS) format. And you'll want to isolate yourself from medium failures, a date bug in SAN, or Trying to find a floppy drive (old school) to put the floppy in.
The problem with this guy, was that he was too cocky and didn't have proper backups. IMHO if he did "Live > Local Backup > Offsite Backup he would have been fine. You backup your live data locally, and then make a copy of that backup to remote / offsite. Three copies, two locations, two media, two formats. Done
it exists because the inability of services to compete for last mile access customers right now.
Correct. But that is largely due to Franchise agreements that restrict competition for that last mile. Those agreements served their purpose during the early periods where CATV didn't offer but one service (TV). Now you have it competing with TriplePlay style services (Internet, Voice, TV). And many of these are irrelevant once you realize that two of the three services (perhaps all three) are just Internet.