Yeah, that whole "I own this property" thing is really evil. I mean could you imagine what it would be like to be homeless and live in tents and shit, that would be way cool! And when you find something you can take it, and use it all up because nobody owns anything. Yeah That sound FANTASTIC!!!
1) is the actual problem. There is no owner of record because the deed is held in a name that has long since passed away, and no heirs can be discovered without going through probate. Which is a long, expensive and often tears families a part. Yes, I've looked into this a bit, and it seems a "lawsuit" is required to discover the rightful owners. And with it, Zuckerberg will likely also have to pay all the back taxes on the land.
Makes Mark seem less like a douche when you stop kneejerking reactions. (He's still a douche, but for other reasons)
What do you get for attacking him without a single reason? No, you personally have no reason to, you have a vague notion of some sort of "social injustice" based on half truths, lies and propaganda.
Most of the people don't even know they own the land. Most of it is in arrears for taxes. The Suit was less about anything and more about trying to make the land contiguous one piece. But that is a measured thoughtful look, even though i was predisposed to hate Zuckerberg with all my guts.
But hey, Kneejerking is political "insightfulness"
You do realize that in Israel, Muslims citizens have full rights, and there is no "apartheid". The only division are the Palestinians who kill anyone that even sides with Jews or Israel. There are no Jews in Palestine.
Here's the two biggest problems with fingerprint sensors. Those two are easily beat. Further, a fingerprint can be compelled by law enforcement to unlock phones, where a passphrase cannot.
You care that John Lewis isn't at the inauguration? How much do you care? I've asked quite a few liberal democrats what they think of John Lewis's action (non-specific) and they have no clue who he is. They don't care. It is beyond what your echo chamber is telling you.
Few if any pundits said "Obama is sitting president of a very divided nation", when the fact is, he was. Just as GWB was before him. And so on.
It is also true that Hillary didn't get 50% of the vote, so more people voted against her than voted for her (same with Trump). Again, so what? None of that matters, and is just noise.
The Left in this country has always had problems with motivating people to get them to the polls.
That's because it is hard to get dead people to vote;):-D
No, I think Palestine should have taken the Two State solution offered by Israel a few years ago, but refused and went on a rampage over it.
The problem is, you think that Palestine wants a two state solution, and they don't. It has been offered, repeatedly, and they keep refusing.
And I wonder why you don't mention the Palestinians "Illegally" launching rockets into Israel. Or the time that Israel pulled its settlements out of Gaza, only to have them turned into rocket launching sites. I'm talking functioning industry and farms being walked away from and turning back into desert because... Palestinians don't want anything the Jews had built.
Palestinians are functionally incapably of peace at this time.
It is because Left Wingers keep parroting "Clinton won the Popular Vote" as if that mattered. When liberals offer that up, it opens up every other comparison out there. Hillary lost the election, popular vote doesn't count. If you wanted it to count, the vote totals would change, substantially. A lot of Republicans in California don't vote because what is the point?
California hasn't had a Republican senator in so long that I can't actually remember who it was.
Arnold was Governor, because well... he's Arnold. Nothing happened on his watch because both houses of the Legislature were D controlled. Now we have "Moonbeam" a complete and utter nutjob.
I've lived in California my whole life. I've lived in both Southern California, and Northern California, and have a pretty good idea how things are going here. Taxes are pushing just about everyone to the breaking point, and even left wing supporting industrialists are moving their plants to other parts of the country because of all the taxes and regulations.
It is so bad, that almost a 1/3 of California (land) wants to form a new state.
But if all you hear is the echo chamber, your views will be skewed.
Here's what I'm mainly worried about -- now that Trump's President, the gloves come off of every single loud-mouthed, opinionated angry citizen who loves to moan and complain. By providing an example of "acceptable" behavior via his constant personal attacks on people
As opposed to all the race rioting spurred on by Obama's stupid comments about Trevon, Harvard Professors, Hands Up Don't Shoot, inviting BLM to the White House?
Or do those don't count because you agree with the cause?
Sorry, you're not Atheist. You're anti-theist. If you were truly atheist, you wouldn't care if people believed in FSM, Jesus, Buhdda, or Cthulhu or nothing at all.
Because the press was going to spend every moment describing how "valiant" John Lewis was, and how "Heroic" a person he was and.....
Trump disengaged it instantly with a tweet, that got everyone talking about something else... Trump.
And the only way to get that tweet some traction was to say something "outrageous". And... You... Took... The... Bait. He won, John Lewis is sitting out and nobody cares. Trump has won that round.
Even if you hate the guy, if you underestimate him, you'll lose every time. That is why he won, and Hillary lost. Because in spite of all the media lined up against him, he distracted the narrative they were trying to paint. Only a few smart people can see past the buffoonery act because it is that powerful. And I believe it is an Act.
For those that don't know what that is, here is the entirety of the text of that clause
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Trump is NOT in violation of this clause. And it is a hillarious claim coming from anyone that voted for Hillary, who would have been actually in violation of this clause, with the Clinton Foundation.
Typically, all "Gifts" from foreign heads of state are property of the US Government and are placed in the public trust.
What this poster is trying to say, is that Trump cannot rent his hotel rooms out to people because that is a "gift".
Here is the definition:
a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office.
I wonder where all these people were when Hillary was SoS and Bill was being paid by all those rich Arab Princes and Kings for giving speeches. Why suddenly they are "horrified" that Trump owns a business that might rent a hotel room to a prince, but said nothing for 4 years while the Clinton's enriched themselves.
Well, Obama was at war for all eight years of his presidency. Beating all other presidents. Hard to argue that he was better than Bush with that record.
More people in 49 states. If you take California out of the Popular Vote tally, Trump wins handily in 49 states. So much so, that the ONLY reason she won popular vote was because of the landslide that was California. And given that California Democrats just put Bernie supporters in power, we'll see how that plays out on the national level.
I am pretty sure that most Americans, including national Democrats don't want California Commies running things.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, that whole "I own this property" thing is really evil. I mean could you imagine what it would be like to be homeless and live in tents and shit, that would be way cool! And when you find something you can take it, and use it all up because nobody owns anything. Yeah That sound FANTASTIC!!!
ha ha funny. Except I didn't vote for Trump, and I am most likely not voting for Zuck. But yeah, that totally sounds like me ....
1) is the actual problem. There is no owner of record because the deed is held in a name that has long since passed away, and no heirs can be discovered without going through probate. Which is a long, expensive and often tears families a part. Yes, I've looked into this a bit, and it seems a "lawsuit" is required to discover the rightful owners. And with it, Zuckerberg will likely also have to pay all the back taxes on the land.
Makes Mark seem less like a douche when you stop kneejerking reactions. (He's still a douche, but for other reasons)
What do you get for attacking him without a single reason? No, you personally have no reason to, you have a vague notion of some sort of "social injustice" based on half truths, lies and propaganda.
Most of the people don't even know they own the land. Most of it is in arrears for taxes. The Suit was less about anything and more about trying to make the land contiguous one piece. But that is a measured thoughtful look, even though i was predisposed to hate Zuckerberg with all my guts.
But hey, Kneejerking is political "insightfulness"
You do realize that in Israel, Muslims citizens have full rights, and there is no "apartheid". The only division are the Palestinians who kill anyone that even sides with Jews or Israel. There are no Jews in Palestine.
Pen Pineapple Apple Pen ... UGHHHH
It WON'T be fixed, thanks to Trolls using Unicode. But thanks for trying.
Here's the two biggest problems with fingerprint sensors. Those two are easily beat. Further, a fingerprint can be compelled by law enforcement to unlock phones, where a passphrase cannot.
You care that John Lewis isn't at the inauguration? How much do you care? I've asked quite a few liberal democrats what they think of John Lewis's action (non-specific) and they have no clue who he is. They don't care. It is beyond what your echo chamber is telling you.
The point is what it represents, a minority making a decision for the majority.
So, you support the tyranny of the majority?
See, that is where the problem is with pure democracy, and why we are a republic, which (supposedly) respects right over groups ;)
Few if any pundits said "Obama is sitting president of a very divided nation", when the fact is, he was. Just as GWB was before him. And so on.
It is also true that Hillary didn't get 50% of the vote, so more people voted against her than voted for her (same with Trump). Again, so what? None of that matters, and is just noise.
The Left in this country has always had problems with motivating people to get them to the polls.
That's because it is hard to get dead people to vote ;) :-D
No, I think Palestine should have taken the Two State solution offered by Israel a few years ago, but refused and went on a rampage over it.
The problem is, you think that Palestine wants a two state solution, and they don't. It has been offered, repeatedly, and they keep refusing.
And I wonder why you don't mention the Palestinians "Illegally" launching rockets into Israel. Or the time that Israel pulled its settlements out of Gaza, only to have them turned into rocket launching sites. I'm talking functioning industry and farms being walked away from and turning back into desert because ... Palestinians don't want anything the Jews had built.
Palestinians are functionally incapably of peace at this time.
It is because Left Wingers keep parroting "Clinton won the Popular Vote" as if that mattered. When liberals offer that up, it opens up every other comparison out there. Hillary lost the election, popular vote doesn't count. If you wanted it to count, the vote totals would change, substantially. A lot of Republicans in California don't vote because what is the point?
California hasn't had a Republican senator in so long that I can't actually remember who it was.
Arnold was Governor, because well ... he's Arnold. Nothing happened on his watch because both houses of the Legislature were D controlled. Now we have "Moonbeam" a complete and utter nutjob.
I've lived in California my whole life. I've lived in both Southern California, and Northern California, and have a pretty good idea how things are going here. Taxes are pushing just about everyone to the breaking point, and even left wing supporting industrialists are moving their plants to other parts of the country because of all the taxes and regulations.
It is so bad, that almost a 1/3 of California (land) wants to form a new state.
But if all you hear is the echo chamber, your views will be skewed.
Violent crime is pretty much at an all-time low.
Except Chicago.
Chicago - Democrat Controlled
DC - Democrat Controlled
Detroit - Democrat Controlled
If you see a pattern forming, it is correlation, not causation.
Here's what I'm mainly worried about -- now that Trump's President, the gloves come off of every single loud-mouthed, opinionated angry citizen who loves to moan and complain. By providing an example of "acceptable" behavior via his constant personal attacks on people
As opposed to all the race rioting spurred on by Obama's stupid comments about Trevon, Harvard Professors, Hands Up Don't Shoot, inviting BLM to the White House?
Or do those don't count because you agree with the cause?
I don't hate Trump, and I don't support him. I agree with some things Trump says, and hate some other things he says. Something about Broken Clocks.
Because of who is narrating the story. Nobody talks about the hate that Obama has engendered, because that would be "Racist" !!!!!!
Sorry, you're not Atheist. You're anti-theist. If you were truly atheist, you wouldn't care if people believed in FSM, Jesus, Buhdda, or Cthulhu or nothing at all.
Yes, it was calculated.
Because the press was going to spend every moment describing how "valiant" John Lewis was, and how "Heroic" a person he was and .....
Trump disengaged it instantly with a tweet, that got everyone talking about something else ... Trump.
And the only way to get that tweet some traction was to say something "outrageous". And ... You ... Took ... The ... Bait. He won, John Lewis is sitting out and nobody cares. Trump has won that round.
Even if you hate the guy, if you underestimate him, you'll lose every time. That is why he won, and Hillary lost. Because in spite of all the media lined up against him, he distracted the narrative they were trying to paint. Only a few smart people can see past the buffoonery act because it is that powerful. And I believe it is an Act.
For those that don't know what that is, here is the entirety of the text of that clause
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Trump is NOT in violation of this clause. And it is a hillarious claim coming from anyone that voted for Hillary, who would have been actually in violation of this clause, with the Clinton Foundation.
Typically, all "Gifts" from foreign heads of state are property of the US Government and are placed in the public trust.
What this poster is trying to say, is that Trump cannot rent his hotel rooms out to people because that is a "gift".
Here is the definition:
a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office.
I wonder where all these people were when Hillary was SoS and Bill was being paid by all those rich Arab Princes and Kings for giving speeches. Why suddenly they are "horrified" that Trump owns a business that might rent a hotel room to a prince, but said nothing for 4 years while the Clinton's enriched themselves.
Hypocrites.
Well, Obama was at war for all eight years of his presidency. Beating all other presidents. Hard to argue that he was better than Bush with that record.
Thank California for that. Because apart from the landslide in California, she lost handily in the rest of the 49 states.
Let me put it this way, according to the Popular Vote, do you think people want California Style Commies in power? I doubt it.
More people in 49 states. If you take California out of the Popular Vote tally, Trump wins handily in 49 states. So much so, that the ONLY reason she won popular vote was because of the landslide that was California. And given that California Democrats just put Bernie supporters in power, we'll see how that plays out on the national level.
I am pretty sure that most Americans, including national Democrats don't want California Commies running things.