Ah, but nobody has ever debated whether Saddam has existed or not. Have independent internationa panels declared the finding that he didn't exist? Did fellow researchers come out and say it was a hoax?
Just come to grips with the fact that there never was any WMDs. Bush seems to have already. Notice how they don't talk about that anymore?
YET? Do you honestly expect that the alleged WMDs will be suddenly uncovered?
It's been months! We've interviewed Iraqi scientists, promised them cash and asylum if they could show us, and they STILL said there never were any. UN scientists, weapons inspectors, and US generals say that they don't exist. The white house is blaming faulty CIA intelligence for misleading the US into going to war, it sounds like Bush gave up the wait and decided to change the reason.
If Saddam continues to say while in custody that he has no WMDs, even while under "Stress and Duress" torture, are you going to believe us now?
And how do we know that? I mean, what evidence is there that he was involved? Bin Laden himself denied doing it, though he said that he supported it and the US had it coming.
As far as I know, Mohammad Atta was the planner, and he died in the plane. Ramzi Bin alSibh and Ramzi Yusuf were captured, and so was Khalid Sheikh Muhammad.
Why should I suspect Bin Laden? Becuase Bush did business deals with his family? Bush makes the accusation, and everyone buys it as truth.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah, but nobody has ever debated whether Saddam has existed or not. Have independent internationa panels declared the finding that he didn't exist? Did fellow researchers come out and say it was a hoax?
Just come to grips with the fact that there never was any WMDs. Bush seems to have already. Notice how they don't talk about that anymore?
YET? Do you honestly expect that the alleged WMDs will be suddenly uncovered?
It's been months! We've interviewed Iraqi scientists, promised them cash and asylum if they could show us, and they STILL said there never were any. UN scientists, weapons inspectors, and US generals say that they don't exist. The white house is blaming faulty CIA intelligence for misleading the US into going to war, it sounds like Bush gave up the wait and decided to change the reason.
If Saddam continues to say while in custody that he has no WMDs, even while under "Stress and Duress" torture, are you going to believe us now?
7,935 Civillian deaths in Iraq as of yesterday is still not acceptable. For what cause did they die?
Don't strawman and distort the issue here, nobody here supports Saddam.
And how do we know that? I mean, what evidence is there that he was involved? Bin Laden himself denied doing it, though he said that he supported it and the US had it coming.
As far as I know, Mohammad Atta was the planner, and he died in the plane. Ramzi Bin alSibh and Ramzi Yusuf were captured, and so was Khalid Sheikh Muhammad.
Why should I suspect Bin Laden? Becuase Bush did business deals with his family? Bush makes the accusation, and everyone buys it as truth.