Online Banks and other internet companies in Germany use Post-Ident for this.
It's a service by the post office where you have to go to the next shop, show your personal identification card and they send the post-ident back to the company:
They may come at that speed, but I can't receive them at that speed: I don't have terabit ethernet, and I don't know how receive infrared satellite transmissions, and my atomic clock only gives me 100 picosecond resolution, so I can't synchronize my decoder to a 10 THz bit stream.
Now if it is only a billion bits per second, I can probably manage, but then someone else can also capure them on disk and archive them on tape.
But there can be more than "one" channel to listen to. In a public-key encrypted message the communication partners decide on the channel to listen to and the time to start listening. Your "enemy" will have to record all channels, you only one. You can even agree to change the channels during the message.
The whole system depends on the amount of information sent (there may be even more than one source of information) and the time it takes to brake the information about channel and starting time.
Increasing the amount of information sent is more simple than increasing the amount of information your "enemy" can store.
Well, you can't control everything in the world, why not just turn yourself off?
Hey,hey, no reason to make it personal.
Javascript is not going to do evil things to your computer, just to the objects on the page. You can't get to Alt-F4 or (whatever window closing keyboard shortcut you use) to close a pop-up window? Please, what's the worst that javascript can do to you?
Your subject is correct, but i think the control freak am not i, but the designer. For example blocking right-clicks is not funny. If i want to open a link in a new window, i want to do just that, not have a dialop appear telling me i should keep my fingers away. That is misusing Javascript an not my idea of surfing the web.
So tell me one use of Javascript, that benefits the USER apart from validating form-data.
You probably use Netscrape on Losix anyway, which has an absolutely horrible to code for document object model compared to that of Microsoft's, so you probably get errors and strange behavior all the time anyway
In fact i am using quite a lot of different browsers for different tasks on different OSs, including Mozilla, Netscape 4.7 and IE on Windows(98SE/2000) and Mozilla, Netscape 4.7 and Konqueror on Linux. And you can tell me what you like, but the fastest by far is Netscape 4.7 on Windows.
With all browsers that I know, i can not control wich kind of Javascript to allow. Mozilla is starting in the right direction here(disabling pop-ups). But pop-ups are not the only problem. The one thing I hate most and that is the reason i usually switch Javascript off are masked links, as seen on the page http://www.webstandards.org/ .
I want to know, where i am going to.
Imagine all Links on/. masked. How often would you find yourself on that goat...- Shit?
There are many, many other abuses of Javascript.
As long as i cannot control it, i will not turn it on.
Nevertheless the site renders correctly only in IE. (The paragraph below "Resources" crosses the intended border.)
So either Mozilla, IE or the page designers don't support the standards. Perhaps it is only my Mozilla Build (2001021304). Can anyone confirm this with a newer / older Build of Mozilla?
This page shows also why nested Tables would have been better: I could use one of the best features of Mozilla and make the fucking Text bigger than 10px on my 15" Monitor with a 1024x768 resolution using my Mouse-Wheel, which on this page i can not do.
I am not from the United States, but if I understand this FUD-Master right,
Microsoft wants to influence, ahem bring to the attention of the government,
that OSS is "hurting" the economy.
They will come to my government too, wich in fact is somewhat embracing
and FUNDING OSS (http://www.berlios.de/partners/index.php.en - note that BMWi is
the ministry for economic affairs of germany) to promote "competition" between OSs.
Apart from that, they want to tell my government, that it
SHALL NOT make the software it produces with the money it
GETS FROM the people available TO THE people?
And in addition to that WASTE that money by not using the
source available BECAUSE OF Open Source Software?
That is insane. Plain and simple. I have to write a letter to
my represantive.
Slashdot Mirror
Online Banks and other internet companies in Germany use Post-Ident for this.
It's a service by the post office where you have to go to the next shop, show your personal identification card and they send the post-ident back to the company:
http://www.deutschepost.de/dpag?tab=1&skin=hi&check=yes&lang=de_EN&xmlFile=1016309
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/macbook-gun-shot-israel-security,9269.html
Don't bring a MacBook then..
sudo bash
Or your shell of choice... works for me.
sudo su -
if you also want to get root's environment...
They may come at that speed, but I can't receive them at that speed: I don't have terabit ethernet, and I don't know how receive infrared satellite transmissions, and my atomic clock only gives me 100 picosecond resolution, so I can't synchronize my decoder to a 10 THz bit stream. Now if it is only a billion bits per second, I can probably manage, but then someone else can also capure them on disk and archive them on tape.
But there can be more than "one" channel to listen to. In a public-key encrypted message the communication partners decide on the channel to listen to and the time to start listening. Your "enemy" will have to record all channels, you only one. You can even agree to change the channels during the message.
The whole system depends on the amount of information sent (there may be even more than one source of information) and the time it takes to brake the information about channel and starting time.
Increasing the amount of information sent is more simple than increasing the amount of information your "enemy" can store.
Hey,hey, no reason to make it personal.
Javascript is not going to do evil things to your computer, just to the objects on the page. You can't get to Alt-F4 or (whatever window closing keyboard shortcut you use) to close a pop-up window? Please, what's the worst that javascript can do to you?
Your subject is correct, but i think the control freak am not i, but the designer. For example blocking right-clicks is not funny. If i want to open a link in a new window, i want to do just that, not have a dialop appear telling me i should keep my fingers away. That is misusing Javascript an not my idea of surfing the web.
So tell me one use of Javascript, that benefits the USER apart from validating form-data.
You probably use Netscrape on Losix anyway, which has an absolutely horrible to code for document object model compared to that of Microsoft's, so you probably get errors and strange behavior all the time anyway
In fact i am using quite a lot of different browsers for different tasks on different OSs, including Mozilla, Netscape 4.7 and IE on Windows(98SE/2000) and Mozilla, Netscape 4.7 and Konqueror on Linux. And you can tell me what you like, but the fastest by far is Netscape 4.7 on Windows.
"why do you hate Java/Javascript?"
/. masked. How often would you find yourself on that goat...- Shit?
With all browsers that I know, i can not control wich kind of Javascript to allow. Mozilla is starting in the right direction here(disabling pop-ups). But pop-ups are not the only problem. The one thing I hate most and that is the reason i usually switch Javascript off are masked links, as seen on the page http://www.webstandards.org/ .
I want to know, where i am going to.
Imagine all Links on
There are many, many other abuses of Javascript.
As long as i cannot control it, i will not turn it on.
Nevertheless the site renders correctly only in IE. (The paragraph below "Resources" crosses the intended border.)
So either Mozilla, IE or the page designers don't support the standards. Perhaps it is only my Mozilla Build (2001021304). Can anyone confirm this with a newer / older Build of Mozilla?
This page shows also why nested Tables would have been better: I could use one of the best features of Mozilla and make the fucking Text bigger than 10px on my 15" Monitor with a 1024x768 resolution using my Mouse-Wheel, which on this page i can not do.
I am not from the United States, but if I understand this FUD-Master right,
Microsoft wants to influence, ahem bring to the attention of the government,
that OSS is "hurting" the economy.
They will come to my government too, wich in fact is somewhat embracing
and FUNDING OSS (http://www.berlios.de/partners/index.php.en - note that BMWi is
the ministry for economic affairs of germany) to promote "competition" between OSs.
Apart from that, they want to tell my government, that it
SHALL NOT make the software it produces with the money it
GETS FROM the people available TO THE people?
And in addition to that WASTE that money by not using the
source available BECAUSE OF Open Source Software?
That is insane. Plain and simple. I have to write a letter to
my represantive.