Just because you're offline at the moment, your email is subject to being searched without a wiretap order? That's what the affidavit seems to be implying. Does this make sense?
But if he's unsuccessful think of all the "this is why we don't let the masses do this" fud we're gonna hear from those in charge. Worse yet is if he hurts someone else. The article doesn't go in to what safeguards he may or may not have taken or who has looked over his designs.
The technicolor 3-strip camera used this method. This camera was used for such films as "Gone With the Wind" and "Wizard of Oz". I uploaded a photo of the camera and a photo of it's description.
would it not be relatively easy to create a program / filter to convert c code (or your favorite language) to text (or something else) that was clearly covered under first amendment laws and then a second filter that could convert it back? Would this not also demonstrate that the code was equivalently covered by the first amendment?
Slashdot Mirror
Just because you're offline at the moment, your email is subject to being searched without a wiretap order? That's what the affidavit seems to be implying. Does this make sense?
>copy con: sillymsg.txt Type some message to the user here blah blah blah ^Z (That's a ctrl-z) >notepad sillymsg.txt
But if he's unsuccessful think of all the "this is why we don't let the masses do this" fud we're gonna hear from those in charge. Worse yet is if he hurts someone else. The article doesn't go in to what safeguards he may or may not have taken or who has looked over his designs.
The technicolor 3-strip camera used this method. This camera was used for such films as "Gone With the Wind" and "Wizard of Oz". I uploaded a photo of the camera and a photo of it's description.
would it not be relatively easy to create a program / filter to convert c code (or your favorite language) to text (or something else) that was clearly covered under first amendment laws and then a second filter that could convert it back? Would this not also demonstrate that the code was equivalently covered by the first amendment?