Slashdot Mirror


To the Moon, Alice

Wa7ly writes: "An amateur rocket scientist in the US hopes to blast off into space this autumn in a $250,000 rocket he built in his back yard. This seems to be a really great idea if he can successfully pull it off and come back to earth safely!" *cough*Darwin Award*cough*

305 comments

  1. Flight Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FAA: "So, what are your flight plans?"
    The guy: "See that big blue thing over your head?"
    FAA: "Yes."
    The guy: "That's where i'll be flying."

  2. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thats it. I've seen people tell you before that your sig is incorrect. However you refuse to fix it. Therefore from this day on I am declaring war against you until you fix your sig. I get mod points constantly. and I like to waste them.
    -tm

  3. website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    The guys got a website http://www.rocketguy.com

    1. Re:website by trcooper · · Score: 2

      He's running Apache on Linux, so he'll probably make it. I mean if it was Windows I'd think the guy was a kook, but he's gotta be alright if he's running linux, right?

  4. Re:Flight plan? by Micah · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know specifics too, but presumable they don't want it to hit a plane. Unlikely but that kind of thing requires planning. The airspace is extremely crowded these days.

  5. This story is old by KaHa · · Score: 1

    And the same superiority-complex pussies are sneering.
    Good luck, Mr. Walker.

  6. Re:jeez, people... by hawk · · Score: 2
    > The Wright brothers were the first people to fly. This guy isn't.


    No they weren't; not even close. But they were the first to have a controlled, powered, heavier than air flight--but gliders (unpowered), balloons (lighter than air), and I think a couple of failed attempts by others (not controlled :) went up before them.


    While I"m at it, the Wright brothers claimed that building an autogyro (helicopter) would have been easier, but the problem was making it move forward once it was up . . .


    hawk

  7. the wright brothers by hawk · · Score: 3
    Wait a minute, wasn't it Wilbur who flew, nah Orville. Wilbur. What the heck, either one is Wright . . .


    hawk

  8. When I saw this in February by heroine · · Score: 2

    It looked like he had a whole bunch of experiments going on in a whole bunch of things but couldn't stay focused long enough to finish any of them. Now 3 months later it looks like his web site is one of them, with the last photos from February before taking another diversion and traveling to Russia. Even if he could finish just one of the things in his back yard, it would definitely take more concentration than he's shown to test it and learn to fly it.

  9. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by joss · · Score: 1

    if you're the webmaster, a URL would be nice

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  10. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by joss · · Score: 2

    The soviets were also smart enough to kick the pants off the US during the first decade of space missions.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  11. Re:Incompetence and the assessment thereof by Tet · · Score: 1
    Fagot and O'Brien (1994) found that socially incompetent boys were largely unaware of their lack of social graces (see Bem & Lord, 1979 , for a similar result involving college students)."

    Valuable information concerning thousands of slashdot readers, I'd say.

    Maybe so, but not in my case. I've always been very aware of quite how socially incompetent I am, and so are most of the other Slashdot-types I know. The problem I have is that I see social etiquette as a game that someone invented with arbitrary rules, and I just don't see the point of playing the game. Consequently, I don't bother.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  12. Re:Darwin? by Tet · · Score: 3
    Thus, if he dies, he will have eliminated from the world his own lack of ability to assess his own ability

    For more information on this phenomenon, see the scary article at http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  13. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by ThoraX695 · · Score: 1

    The Wright brothers' bicycle shop was in Dayton, Ohio. They just made their first test flight in Kitty Hawk, NC.

    --
    --ThoraX695
  14. Loon. by BooRadley · · Score: 1
    I've been looking at his designs at http://www.rocketguy.com and there are some little details that say this guy's headed more for an early grave than any suborbital flight. For one thing, he's using sewer-grade 12" PVC for his "Fuel Tanks." Sounds great, right? This stuff will crack from the force of rolling off of a truck, and he wants to use it as not only a storage container for a highly volatile and reactive chemical, but also as a gravity-fed fuel delivery system. On a rocket-propelled craft travelling at MACH-4!

    I'm really hoping he doesn't actually try to store the distilled 90% pure hydrogen peroxide anywhere on his property. He will move from the status of "Local Character" to "Community Menace" very quickly.

    I think amateur rocketry is a helluva lot of fun, and properly engineered rockets can even deliver satellite payloads. This guy's efforts are more of the "tinfoil helmet" variety, and shouldn't be confused with what some folks are actually doing to improve actual steam propelled rockets. Check out http://www.erps.org for a few interesting sidenotes on this engine type.

    --

    -- lk t lv ll th vwls t f wrds. T svs lts f tm t wrt bt ts pn n th ss t rd nd mks m lk lk cmplt dpsht.

  15. You are the nay-sayers that you've always hated. by Drake42 · · Score: 1

    Think about it. You're the people that future generations will look back at and say "Boy, it's a good thing Mr.SoAndSo didn't listen to all those idiots who said it was impossible. We'd still be back at the turn of the century if he did!"

    If you have a technical argument, bring it. If you have a bunch of "I don't think he can do it, because I know I can't do it." type of whining then, don't bother posting it.

    Personally, I think the whole thing is a hoax, of the 'move it all to Mexico' statement. However, that doesn't mean a non-NASA person couldn't make something like this happen.

  16. How does he deal with thrust imbalance? by Morgaine · · Score: 4

    As a close friend of Rocket Guy ...

    You might be the right person to ask this to then. How does he intend to prevent the rocket from going up and over and straight back down into the ground, or else up and around and around like a catherine wheel?

    The mere fact that the rocket outlet is in front of the centre of mass of the vehicle does not guarantee anything at all about the direction of travel. If the thrust is sufficient but not perfectly balanced on the line between the centre of mass of the rocket and the gravitational centre of the Earth, the leading rocket can easily pull the whole vehicle up and around and down or into a rapid catherine wheel spin.

    There could be absolutely nothing the pilot can do about this manually because the potentially huge inertial forces could pin him (or any mechanical devices) into immobility. And it could all happen so fast that he wouldn't have time to balance the upward thrust nicely.

    The time to think about this is now.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:How does he deal with thrust imbalance? by rasper99 · · Score: 1
      Yes, he has thought about it. The design is in a state of continous improvement. It is not like the computer animation anymore. More about the animation below. From the publicity Rocket Guy has recieved many real rocket scientists have proposed changes. Rocket Guy doesn't want to give detailed information out because there are others planning similar ventures. He wants to keep his technology advantage.

      The animation:
      The computer animation was done about a year ago. The animation has not been redone to save money for the rocket. It was done by a 14 year old kid. It was inexpensive to have done and he did great work. The kid is now making big bucks.

  17. Re:A failure. by drix · · Score: 2

    It wasn't a failure. I already knew he killed himself, which is why I'm doing justice to his memory. They guy felt like flying. He flew. End of story.

    --

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  18. Re:Cool by drix · · Score: 4

    Ahem... the guy (AKA Larry Walters, e.g. "Lawn Chair Larry") who put baloons on his lawn chair and flew up into the sky had it go off like a charm, if I remember correctly. He got up to about 16000 feet, drifted for 14 hours, drank beer, and ate sandwiches, before finally drifting into an LAX approach lane, at which point he descended, got caught in some power lines, and climbed down. He survived, and got probably the coolest, quietest, and most serene bird's eye view of Los Angeles (parts of it at night, no less) that anyone in history has ever gotten. How do you call that a failure?

    --

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  19. This is in the New York Post, people! by Jonathan · · Score: 2

    For those who aren't familar with it, it is worth stating that the New York Post, although once a respectable paper in the 19th and earrly 20th centuries, is currently little better than the National Enquirer or Weekly World Sun, and generally prints stories like "Aliens kidnap hamster". Unless somebody can find a version of the story in a more serious source, I can only assume it is fictional.

    1. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1
      Actually, I haven't seen a story about aliens or hamsters in the 20 years I've read the paper. Gossip? Yeah. Sports. A pile of it.

      Maybe it's the Right-leaning opinions you don't like.

      Either way, the Post is a reputable news source. It takes a good paper to occasionally print unpopular things. Right is wrong, Left is right. I know. Bleeding heart liberals and all.

      The Times it ain't.


      --

    2. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by chorner · · Score: 1
      For a serious source, try the source.

      It looks like he's got something going on...or he likes building strange structures in the middle of nowhere.

    3. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by jsewell · · Score: 5

      How about the February issue of Space Illustrated, the magazine produced by the space.com people?

      http://www.space.com/mag/contents_february.php3

      (Now granted, space.com may not be a reputable source either, to those in the space biz, but it's at least better than the NY Post...)

    4. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by searleb · · Score: 3

      How about the Oregonian, Oregon's largest paper.
      Also, St. Petersburg Times and the guy was supposedly on CBS "The Early Show", too.

    5. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      Read the Oregonian version, a lot more information . Thanks to searleb for posting.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    6. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by core10k · · Score: 1

      >It takes a good paper to occasionally print unpopular things.

      (sigh) I'm a liberal, but let's face it, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that Jesse Jackson is one corrupt motherfucker.

    7. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by reezle · · Score: 3

      I caught in in the Local news shows the last few weeks. People are taking it seriously, here...

    8. Re:This is in the New York Post, people! by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a capitalist news media can lean right or left; they lean towards whatever is profitable. Writers aren't going to spontaneously conspire to lean towards anything, but the higher-ups that ultimately decide what goes in and what stays out are driven by greed. I wouldn't consider any of the corporate media to be reputable. But anyway, the Post is owned by News Corp and the Fox Entertainment Group, which most people seem to think is inherently untrustworthy.

      I don't doubt the validity of this story, but people should pay closer attention to the news sources they put so much trust in. Coincidentally, the advert for tonights local news in Charlotte NC is an investigative report on possible UFO visits.

  20. This has nothing to do with politics! by Jonathan · · Score: 2

    Oh, come on! This has nothing to do with politics. The Wall Street Journal is a reputable right-wing paper -- The Post is a tabloid.

  21. Re:He's not the first! by armb · · Score: 1

    > On RocketGuy's website, he writes (in third person, no less) that his goal is "to set the altitude record for a private citizen". I don't want to shatter his dream, but Dennis Tito became the first space tourist this past week.

    You don't think setting a record for "private citizen in his own privately built rocket" and for "private citizen going along as a passemger on a government funded mission" might be different dreams?

    --

    --
    rant
  22. Re:uhhh.. by ocie · · Score: 1

    Never be afraid to try something new. Remeber, Amateurs build the Ark, professionals built the Titanic.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  23. There *are* amateur rocketeers launching from Bend by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1

    While this story may be fictional, there is a group from Portland, OR that are working on rockets to be fired from Bend, OR. Their website is at www.psas.pdx.edu. They're working on inertial navigation, and recently put out a call for volunteers to work on a port of [uC]Linux to the mpc555 chip, which is a PPC variant.

    They are launching from Bend because they can get clearance there for the altitudes they expect to hit. When they want to go higher (say, the 100km mark), they'll have to go to Alaska, from what I hear. Alaska's got the only true spaceport that's not NASA controlled, and with (easier) FAA approval you can actually launch from there. Or try for a sea-launch and hope you don't flub the schedule <g>

    --
    GStreamer - The only way to stream!
  24. My advice... by mattkime · · Score: 1

    I hope he has plenty of glo-plugs, as I know it always took me a few to start my model rockets.

    Also, i hope he remember to wrap the parachue right, otherwise it'll just tumble end over end until it gets caught in a tree.

    Why didn't the Hooters girls ever help me celebrate my rocket launches?

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  25. Re:Info on Mexico? by SirTreveyan · · Score: 1

    A couple of points to note. 1) It is powered by H2O2 ( hydrogen peroxide ) not steam. Steam is a by product from the reaction with the silver catalist screen. 2) While H2O2 can be purchased in stores, it in not of sufficient purity (~5% H2O2 mixed with 95% H2O) to be used in this context. H2O2 in its pure form is highly corrosive, as well as being spontaneously explosive under the right conditions. I think that nixes out EASY transportation across the border.

    --

    SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0

    0 rows returned

  26. shuttle != 400 miles by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    The shuttle has a max altitude of about 400 kilometres, which is a lot less than 400 miles.

    http://www.friends-partners.org/mwade/lvs/shuttle. htm

  27. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    I mean, come on, just because the guy did not complete a college degree doesn't make him an idiot.
    Indeed. The first time I had to professionally interact with an engineer permanently cured me from whishing I had taken engineering.

    --

  28. Re:slow down by Detritus · · Score: 3

    One of the issues that the FAA is going to be concerned about is range safety. This means that the people who are launching the rocket will have to convince the FAA that the rocket is not going to nose over and crash into an elementary school. For NASA, commercial and military launches, there is a Range Safety Officer (RSO) who is responsible for sending a destruct command to the launch vehicle if it deviates from the planned trajectory.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  29. uhhh.. by RAruler · · Score: 1

    While i'm not doubting the guy's abilities, it says that he's a multimillionaire. Now, if I had multimillions, i'd follow Tito. I mean, why not leave it up to people who know what they are doing, and have done it sucessfully. I mean, look at all the failures that have happened in both the American and Russian space programs. Getting into space is a little more complex than strapping a whole lot of explosives to something, and praying :)

    ---

    --

    --
    Insert Witty Sig Here
    1. Re:uhhh.. by Betcour · · Score: 2

      Well the art of sending a rocket up has been long mastered by thousands of amateur around the world. I'd say the hard part is more about following a price tragectory (like going to orbit), maintaining life conditions aboard, etc...

      This guy is not trying to do anything like that - he just want to go as high as possible, then get back alive. He isn't aiming for a precise tragectory ("up" is the flying plan) and isn't planning on staying in space either. Doesn't sound all that impossible to do. Remember we are not in the 60s anymore, a lots of modern technology and materials are available for cheap and in quantity.

    2. Re:uhhh.. by norton_I · · Score: 3

      Well, that is you. But some people would rather be a captain than a tourist.

      I am not planning on following either of these guys, but I have more respect for this guy than Tito.

      Tito is basically a spoiled rich guy who has figured out that for enough money you can get almost anyone to do almost anything. But designing and building the rocket yourself on another level.

      They should make a Mastercard commercial about it :)

    3. Re:uhhh.. by steveha · · Score: 1
      Tito is basically a spoiled rich guy

      Why do you say that Mr. Tito is "spoiled"? What bad thing has he done to make you say this about him?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:uhhh.. by rblancarte · · Score: 1

      Would that MasterCard commercial be something like this:

      HomeMade Rocket - $250,000
      FireSuit - $400
      Helment, Gloves - $60
      Blowing yourself up like the first tested Mercury Launch and winning the 2001 Darwin Award - PRICELESS
      There are somethings money can't ... blah blah blah

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    5. Re:uhhh.. by phague · · Score: 1

      If this rocket fails (he'll almost certainly die if it doess) then all thats happened is some fool has blown himself up trying to be a rocket scientist. On the other hand, his plan may very well work. He has spent a lot of time on this, and seeing as hes going to be sitting on this rocket when it fires I'd assume he's put quite a lot of thought into safety (He may not mind dying in the attempt, but I guess he'd rather not). If his rocket is a success, it'll be great news for him. He'll be famous(ish) and accomplished a lifelong dream. His acheivement though, will mean next to nothing to most other people. Sure, he may inspire a few others to repeat the feat, but they aren't going to acheive anything beyond personal satisfaction either. And most of the people who try to copy him are going to put a lot less though into this and die.

    6. Re:uhhh.. by Postman_77 · · Score: 2

      This guy obviously went to the Wyle E. Coyote school of aerodynamics.

    7. Re:uhhh.. by The+Black+Star · · Score: 1

      The Ark was proven to be very a couple of years ago. They found the remains. Just because it is biblical, does not make it false... or true for that matter. Nevertheless, we have the remains. You cannot deny it, if we have remains, it is like saying that the Dinosaurs never existed. "So I'm a tyrant, it doesn't mean that I'm wrong"

  30. Re:Don't know if it has been said yet... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    Interesting problem. Do you think, that if he solves the balancing problem that he'll have angular momentum problems once he gets high enough? Is 30 miles high enough? Will he accidentally hit the ocean or some city because the earth turned underneath him while his rocket was in the air?

  31. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    I still think you're going to see interesting angular momentum problems. You have to be going around lots faster to go around once every 24 hours if you're 30 miles farther away from the center of the earth.

    I was impressed in the article noting that the propulsion system was actually thought out and not something totally half baked. :-)

    Good luck to your friend. I hope he makes it. :-)

  32. Re:lose-lose situation by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Nobody's forcing YOU to build one of these things and kill yourself on it. If somebody else wants to, let him by. Don't try to run other people's lives just to keep them out of harm's way.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  33. Computer animation of the flight by Jeremi · · Score: 1
    Here is a slightly outdated MPEG computer rendering of the flight, stolen from his web site

    -Jeremy (playing the karma whore today)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  34. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by Justin+Motion · · Score: 1

    >Incidentall, did Nasa have to file flight plans during the shuttle launches? They'd be interesting to see.

    Probably...but it'd be a simple one: powered acceleration curve to insert into orbit, until such time as they go over the FAA's head.

  35. Re:Darwin? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    It might be very appropriate. This could be something which would make him rather famous, and that has noted benefits, as well as penalties.

    Caution: Now approaching the (technological) singularity.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  36. Re:This is his reward? by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Hooters must be different in Oregon. Here in Indy, Hooters doesn't seem to employ attractive women, or women with breasts, hooters if you will.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  37. Well, if not the Darwin Award, maybe the X Prize? by Soko · · Score: 3

    I went to the guys site, and the tech is at the very least plausable. The Silver/H2O2 tech has proven itself (rocket powered dragster Sprit Of Australia - 300+ MPH/4.11 second 1/4 mile), and the rest seems not without merit. I think he'll land using the chute on his back - but he'll land.

    Yes, he has a good shot at the Darwin Award to be sure, but he might actally be the first to collect the X Prize. What he proposes isn't any sillier than what these inventive people from my country intend to use to collect the $10M US (about $20CDN).

    I myself salute his moxy and entrepreneurial spirit. No way I'd hit the button to light that candle.

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  38. NY Post IS reputable! by Figec · · Score: 1
    The NY post is just as reputable as any of the other heavy circulation papers in the city. This "bad reputation" comes from its right leaning op-eds and often quoted gossip pages. I have yet to see an "Aliens kidnap hamster"-like story grace its layout.

    I find it to be a solid NY-centric news source without the PC and liberal bullcrap that makes the NY Daily News (its main rival) not worthy to line a bird cage. Check it out and make your own judgement:

    http://www.nypost.com

  39. more about brian walker's project... by GI+Jones · · Score: 1
    There are several places you can go for more information on this story here are a few:

    AD ASTRA, EVERYMAN!
    The Rocket Guy
    When Rocket Guy dreams

    I wish this guy would put up a website to record his progress and report on the project... but I couldn't find anything like that.

    --
    "Perhaps most amazingly, votaries of 'diversity' insist on absolute conformity." -- Tony Snow
  40. Another failed attempt... by malacai · · Score: 1

    The truth is this guy was upset that Mir and
    that X-10 plane or whatever it was didn't
    hit the Taco Bell sign, so he's taking
    the matter into his own hands ... if he
    hits the sign, he gets to look like
    a chalupa ... for free (minus the costs
    of building the rocket of course)...

  41. Interview him!! by austad · · Score: 4

    Maybe Slashdot should set up an interview so we can submit questions to him. It would be interesting to see what he has to say.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  42. Re:Cool by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Since he's not going into orbit, he doesn't need orbital calculations. It's a sub-orbital ballistic shot, like Alan Shepard flew in 1962 (before John Glenn's orbital flight).

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  43. New Slashdot Poll by jon_eaves · · Score: 1
    I can see it now;

    Slashdot Poll

    The outcome I'd most like to see with Rocket Man is:

    • Miscalculates velocity and makes it to the moon
    • Blows up on launch
    • Makes home alive to Hooters cheer squad
    • Lands on CowboyNeals house

    Cheers,
    -- jon

  44. Re:jeez, people... by Borg#9 · · Score: 1

    >He doesn't want to advance science, he just wants to have champagne poured on him by Hooters girls.

    And there is something *wrong* with this?

    --
    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball
  45. Re:More from Before by suraklin · · Score: 1

    ...or more money than a small country...

    $250,000 is still a large chunk of cash. I imagine not many people have that in their couch cushions.

  46. First Contact by bug_hunter · · Score: 2

    Need I remind you that the ship that brought us into first contact with the Vulcans was made by one hick (not counting interferance by future generations). Oh wait, I'm confusing imagination with reality again. Just like everybody who thinks this story is genuine.

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
    1. Re:First Contact by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

      heehee! this brings to mind one of my favorite sigs i've see on Slashdot "Remember.. Star Trek is not a Documentary". I wish I could rememeber whose it was.

  47. I've met Brian Walker by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    I've met him, and one of the people who works with him is one of my best friends from high school, who majored in physics and worked with a company at Edwards AFB in California developing experimental aircraft.

    I think he'll succeed.

    http://rocketguy.com/ is his website.

    [RANT MODE ON]: I submitted this story a week ago, how is it that me, who has inside information on the subject, gets rejected, and this guy, who merely saw it on the NYT gets it posted?

    2001-04-30 18:01:06 Manned Amateur Rocketry (articles,space) (rejected)

    [RANT MODE OFF]

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  48. I've met him... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    I've met him, and been to his backyard, and seen the equipment

    It wouldn't be hard for me to get in touch with him again

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  49. Not THAT peroxide! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    As someone said above - what's in stores is 97% WATER. Go back and visit John Carmack's site concerning his efforts. One of the more interesting tests are those that they did on clothes in order to determine that which was mos safe. John himself said that some of those tests were "interesting" to say the least. This is the sort of chemical that EATS aluminum, stainless steel, and will eat YOU if you're not careful. Not cheap either.

    Honestly, I'm wondering how this guy figures he'll go straight up and straight back down. How the heck is he going to steer his descent let alone his ascent? Same with the fuel pod that he plans to jettison - what prevents that from landing on a home? Is this the dry lakes he's launching from? They're big but THAT big?

    I wish him luck though. I too am VERY frustrated with NASA and Congressional funding of same. If we had a gun to our heads today to goto the Moon we'd be pulling crap out of mothballs to do it. That's pathetic! Why have we moved so slowly forward and why are we relying on such an expensive maintenance intensive craft to do it? there has got to be a better way but I'm starting to doubt I'll see any of it in my lifetime if folks like this guy and John Carmack among others don't get things kickstarted. NASA is mired down, we need some help fomr the more creative people out there...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  50. He also has a site... by Racher · · Score: 1

    Rocketguy has a website. Complete with simulation vidoes, and pictures of where he is building his rocket and centrifuge.
    ...and I'm not sure we should trust this Kyle Sagan either.

  51. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by tadas · · Score: 1

    "Louise Brooks naked and petrified! "

    Minor quibble -- Brooks was from the 20's and early 30's.

    I'd have picked one of the hotties of that era, such as Evelyn Nesbitt (the "Gibson Girl", involved in a murder scandal about 3 to 5 years after the Wright Brothers' original flight), or Lillian Russell (more from the 1890's, but still prominent in the decade of 1900).

    --
    This page accidentally left blank
  52. Re:jeez, people... by ajs · · Score: 2

    Exactly what the Darwin Award is all about.

    If you just sit on your couch like a lump you can never achieve the acclaim of your peers or do something blindingly stupid enough to win the Darwin Award. The line between the two is success.

    If this guy does what he says he will do, he will be famous. If he screws up... well, let's just say that he'll not be worrying the rest of us with the proliferation of his DNA ;)

    I wish him the best, and hope he does it. Amature spaceflight might just be the only way to wake up corporations to the value of private space exploitation.

  53. Re:This isn't news! by Zurk · · Score: 1

    damn that impressive. everyone read that. BTW, the same type of brake arrangement is used on trains.

  54. his web page. by jitterbug · · Score: 1

    Rocket Guy has a Web page. This has got to be one of the strangest looking rockets ever.

  55. Here, Poochie....! by csbruce · · Score: 1

    Maybe he should consider sending his dog instead.

  56. Re:Ha by Balthasar · · Score: 1

    Man I hope they televise this.

    Be as good to watch as Challenger was :)

    --
    _______________________ I am the eggman, wooo! _______________________
  57. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    You're afraid an engineering degree would make you dumber?
    --

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  58. Don't know if it has been said yet... by cr0sh · · Score: 3

    I know it was mentioned on the older article:

    This guy would do well to look over this web page, and understand why rockets are inverted, rather than hanging, pendulums.

    If he continues with his current plan, about all he'll end up doing is making a nice crater in the lake bed...

    Worldcom - Generation Duh!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Don't know if it has been said yet... by jesser · · Score: 1

      That page explains why you can't solve the balancing problem just by putting the thrust at the top, but it doesn't explain why you can't apply the same solution (fins) used to stabalize rockets where the thrust is at the bottom. Is there a reason that fins wouldn't work for hanging rockets?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    2. Re:Don't know if it has been said yet... by jidar · · Score: 2

      The point is, placing the engine at the top is not any easier to balance than placing it at the bottom. That's not to say that it is harder, but it isn't any easier. So in reference to your question, yes you can. Whatever works with one design works with the other as far as aerodynamics are concerned.

      That said placing the engine at the top is a losing design. You don't gain stability but you add complexity and weight in that you have to get the trust to the bottom of the rocket and pump your fuel against gravity.

      --
      Sigs are awesome huh?
    3. Re:Don't know if it has been said yet... by the_crowbar · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read his website? It explains that he will be using a 120 ft tower to launch. This tower will allow his rocket stability until air is moving fast enough over its fin to accomplish the same thing. This idea is mentioned at the bottom of the page you provided a link to. Here is the specific page on his site.
      http://www.rocketguy.com/rocket/model.html
      Just FYI
      the_crowbar

      --
      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines
  59. Damn, He thought of everything... by Exantrius · · Score: 1


    "According to his plans, a pickup truck will be waiting to drive him to a group of bleachers where fans and 12 Hooters bar girls will pour champagne all over him. "

    Now all he's got to do is git liquered up and shoot himself to the moon...

    -Ex

  60. Columbus was a dope. by wiredog · · Score: 2

    nt

  61. Re:carrying on after wilbur and orville by lost_it · · Score: 1

    "I think he is carrying on a fine tradition where one person with guts can make a big impact on the world"...quite literally, if he screws up. Yup, he'll leave his mark alright :-)

    Seriously, I hope he makes it, but I'll be staying a (hopefully) safe distance away.

  62. Re:Flight plan? by Owen+Lynn · · Score: 1

    Anyone who isn't seriously impaired can get a class 3. Costs $70-$90 and a doctor's visit.

    I think it would be courteous to file a flight plan, since he is going to "flying" into class Alpha airspace. I'm not sure what the sectional looks like, but it's prolly Class Echo, followed by Class Alpha. However, I think the FAA could cut the poor guy a little slack - as long as he isn't going to be interfering with any airline traffic, let him have his fun. If I was him, I'd just go to Mexico, the FAA can be a real bitch to deal with.

    The FAA is to the aviation world, as the IRS is to the business world. Some people bring joy when they arrive, others when they leave, and the FAA definitely brings joy when they're leaving.

  63. Re:jeez, people... by ASCIIMan · · Score: 1

    Actually, that would be Godacceleration. Godspeed would be the speed at which he plummets to earth in a flaming pile of wreckage because his hydrogen peroxide motor explodes.

  64. Re:jeez, people... by ddstreet · · Score: 1

    I can imagine Orville Wright saying the same thing...

    Ok, maybe if Orville Wright was saying that before he tested his plane at the Grand Canyon (instead Kitty Hawk, NC which is flat and not dangerous), while the Air Force flies around in jets above him...

    The Wright brothers were the first people to fly. This guy isn't. He doesn't want to advance science, he just wants to have champagne poured on him by Hooters girls.

  65. Re:carrying on after wilbur and orville by ddstreet · · Score: 1

    I think he is carrying on a fine tradition where one person with guts can make a big impact on the world.

    Yeah, he's going to make a very big impact on a dry Oregon lake bed.

  66. Especially insightful, because the Wright Bros by devphil · · Score: 5


    some fucking bike shop owners from north carolina trying to FLY, for god's sake, FLY!

    This would be very like /. considering the brothers weren't from North Carolina. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  67. Deja Vu by dsb · · Score: 3

    This story was reported on Slashdot over 6 months ago with a link to a seattletimes.com story having slightly more information.

  68. Re:Ha by grytpype · · Score: 1

    If you can't tell the guy is a freak who is going to blow himself up, you're a fucking idiot. His life's work so far has been to drop out of school, do some worthless shit, and then blow himself up. He and his life's work deserve mockery of the highest degree.

    --

    - Have a picture

  69. Re:should we give him the award now or later? by joshuac · · Score: 1

    ---snip
    the combined PhD's that GRADUATED COLLEGE at NASA
    ---snip

    Graduated college at NASA? Oh dear.

  70. Re:Cool by adjuster · · Score: 1

    Putting a man into an amateur space vehicle is, IMHO, probably a bad idea. I think it's highly do-able for amateurs to put vehicles into orbit. I'm a "high power model rocketry" fanatic, and I have a lot of respect and appreciation for what can be accomplished with simple solid-fuel boosters. There are orders of magnitude difference, however, between the complexity of a small solid or liquid fueled booster that can achieve tens of thousands of feet of altitude, and a booster capable of throwing a payload into a stable orbit.

    I believe the technology necessary to put men into space is not beyond the grasp of private individuals or small corporations. Look at the advances in technology since the 1960's and the "golden age" of the U.S. space program-- it should be possible to do the same things the Mercury or Gemini programs did for a fraction of the research and development cost.

    Having civilians participate in the space program is the best way to build enthusiasm for the space program-- but I don't think it wise for private individuals or corporations to go trying to loft men into space just yet... There has not been enough unmanned testing of vehicles yet to assure that launching these things will be safe for the men onboard, or those of us on the ground!

    --
    The Attitude Adjuster, I hate me, you can too.
  71. Re:Oh boy... by Slur · · Score: 1

    I don't know how easy it is to teach yourself the engineering involved in this kind of adventure.

    Oh come on!! It's not like this is rocket sci----

    Oh shit, never mind!



    --------
    Yeah, I'm a Mac programmer. You got a problem with that?

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  72. Re:Ha by ScumBiker · · Score: 1

    Give him a break. It's his choice if he wants to risk his life doing this, not yours. I, for one, don't think he's a freak at all. Of course, I grew up during the rocket crazed 60's, so I really don't see anything that insane about what he's doing. The guy is only 4 years older than I am and I can empathise with what he's doing very, very much. I also dropped out of college. Wanna compare tax returns? He deserves kudos for having the balls to try what NASA has been saying is impossible. What if he succeeds? Mass produced space-rockets? WOOHOO!! Sign me up!



    Dive Gear

    --
    --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  73. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by DMoylan · · Score: 1

    >>>Mr. Walker should be commended for his ambition, its people like this that change the world.

    I wish him luck but I fear the only change he will make to the world will be the crater he leaves behind!

  74. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by pubudu · · Score: 1
    I mean, come on, just because the guy did not complete a college degree doesn't make him an idiot. It seems too many people are down on this guy just because he doesn't have a degree behind his name. Don't get me wrong, I do find the magnitude and risks of this undertaking quite high. That's a no brainer. But who here is to say he won't pull this off. If its because he has no degree, I say think again.

    I don't think it's a question of stereotypes; I haven't seen any posts that say it'll never work because he doesn't have a college degree. I would say he's a madman even if he had a Ph.D. in Backyard Rocket Design from MIT. I would say he's mad were he Goddard himself.

    Of course, I'd still ask him to go ahead and do it anyway; there's no risk he'd crash into my house or that of a loved one. Madmen do occasionally pull something off. Just because a couple of bicycle mechanics manage to survive, however, doesn't mean that a great many others don't go splat, their experiments providing footage for countless commercials which state "there's a better way to do things." But, better he go splat than me, and I want his cool toys.

    --
    ~~~~~~

    under-paid karma whore

  75. Re:Cool by deblau · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd hate to be the guy below him who got the receiving end of 14 hours of beer-piss...

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  76. The public's short memory by Lew+Pitcher · · Score: 2

    Too bad most people don't remember Robert Truax. He gained fame in the '70s by building a single-man rocket and selling rides in it (I don't know that it ever launched, but it was intended to). You can find Mr. Truax's website at http://www.rctruax.com/, where he and his company will be able to sell you one of his "Excalibur" low cost space launch vehicles. According to the website, these vehicals have the capability to place payloads ranging from 200 to 1,000,000 lbs to LEO and other space orbits.

    --

    "values of beta will give rise to dom!"

    1. Re:The public's short memory by anon757 · · Score: 1

      The difference, is that this guy isnt asking anyone for money. If it was a scam, he's not very smart, because he is going to walk away from it broke.

  77. Save yourself some time and just go to Hooters by rumba · · Score: 1

    According to his plans, a pickup truck will be waiting to drive him to a group of bleachers where fans and 12 Hooters bar girls will pour champagne all over him.

    Well, he doesn't even know if the FAA will let him do it, but he certainly knows what he wants after he succeeds. Sheesh. Some people will do anything for a little female attention. I guess if he can't do it, he could always just rent the Hooters girls and show them his rocket. Hooters, sheesh.

  78. Re:Ha by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, developing a non commercial clone of a powerful OS for a computer that is little more than a toy isn't likely to get you blown to smithereens. The chances of some critical failure to happen for this guy are huge -- the guys at NASA fucked up a minor detail and whoops, there goes Challenger and everyone on it. You think a lone man can create a failure-proof rocket? If he manages to attempt his launch, more than likely he'll end up dead. Sure, follow your dreams and all that, but one should realize when one's dreams are more than likely fatal.

  79. Re:Ummm... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Once the fuel tank separates there will be different amounts of atmospheric drag on the fuel tank and the capsule. This will result in the fuel tank slowing down faster than the capsule. As a result the fuel tank will remain below the capsule. Thats why Allen Shepherd's redstone didn't hit him in the ass on re-entry. (It crashed into the ocean before the capsule landed, almost hitting a freighter!) Also, the article said that the fuel tank would parachute down, I assume it's chute's would deploy first.

  80. Heard this before by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like Bob Trueax (not sure how to spell that) who designed Evil Knivel's sky cycle. Bob was an Ex-Nasa engineer who was designing his own space shuttle out of disgarded rocket parts. The TV show "Salvage One" (about a junkyard owner and an ex astronaut who went to the moon to collect old apollo 'junk') was based on him.

  81. Re:Creationist Award by slithytove · · Score: 1

    skilful (sic) and intelligent people who kill themselves may or may not have reproduced beforehand:)

  82. Re:Oh Dear by Jailbrekr · · Score: 1

    Ah yes. Whoever moderated me down, I thank you. You have proved that moderation does *not* work.

    I think I will keep posting insightful, or witty commentary using my IAmNotA_Spork user account to show exactly how broken this moderation system is.....

    Give power to an idiot, and they will only abuse it.....

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
  83. It wont ever work by selectspec · · Score: 2

    The space capsule doesn't have room for his balls which clearly are the biggest on Earth.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  84. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by selectspec · · Score: 3

    The fact that this guy didn't go to college is irrellevant. What makes him certifiable, is that he is going to launch himselve 36 miles into the outer atmosphere. Of course his celebration plan is to get drunk at Hooters, which makes him some kind of crazy-idiot-genius all at the same time.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  85. Re:Apples and oranges? by jesser · · Score: 1

    This does bring up the always intriguing argument about what actually defines intelligence. Currently, one of my favorite definitions is "The ability to relate two unrelated thoughts/items/etc.".

    I can pick two words at random from the dictionary and form a sentence using those words might. Does that count? (How about "the ability to relate two seemingly unrelated thoughts/items/etc. in a useful way"?)

    By the way, I think this definition is better suited for "creativity" than for "intelligence".

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  86. More on the Guy by bogomipe · · Score: 1
    Check out this article in another paper that paints an ... interesting ... picture of the inventor. Also a couple of pictures!

    --
    - mipe -
  87. A modern day Wan-Hu by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    The guy reminds me of a once adventurous Chinese official named Wan-Hu who assembled a rocket powered flying chair. He attached to a chair two large kites along with a multitude of rockets (remember the chinese were the first to discover gun powder).

    He commanded his servants, armed with torches, to light the rockets at the same time. When the smoke and fire cleared Wan-Hu was never found (at least not in any recognizable pieces)!

    Depending on your point-of-view Wan-Hu was either an epitome of the human pioneering spirit or a potential canidate for a darwin award.

  88. buzz, wrong! (maybe) by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1

    My guess is he *DOES* understand the risks, but is going to try it anyway because it's the chance of a lifetime.

    But even if that is the case, it's most definately still a trait that evolution would weed out. So, your conclusion is still correct, that he would be a perfect candidate for a darwin award.

    But, who knows, maybe he really knows what he's doing and will come out of this alright.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  89. Re:local insight by Guido+del+Confuso · · Score: 1

    btw, we don't call him the "rocket guy" around here. at best he's the "rocket cook".

    'Ey, pizano, you-a tasta da nice-a rocket, eh si? Izza good for you! You like, eh? Luigi cooka da rocket a-good, no?

  90. Re:slow down by romi · · Score: 1

    Moreover, what incentive would the FAA have to permit such a launch?
    If it goes well, NASA, the government etc. end up looking foolish for spending so much money when some clown with a quarter-mil got himself into space.
    If it goes badly (a far more likely scenario IMHO ;), then they get criticized for allowing such an obviously reckless and foolhardy stunt to be carried out.

  91. Re:space.com by jsewell · · Score: 1

    I know it! I did actually buy the magazine months ago, and it's not a bad article, maybe not worth buying a whole magizine for, but what the heck. All the guy wanted was a source other than the NY Post, so that's what I provided. Seems there are other sources available on the net, as provided by others: www.rocketguy.com and even a /. story on this last summer, which pre-dates the space.com magazine by a lot...

  92. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

    I'm going to disagree with your statement that there is no correlation between degrees and intelligence. The probability of someone having one or more college degrees and being intelligent is far far far higher than someone with no degrees or no high school education.

    I grew up near a small town in a very rural area. I've met a lot of "blue collar" guys who were reasonably intelligent. But the majority of them (both men and women) were the type of person that wondered "why in the world" I'd want to go off to college and learn "stuff that ain't good fer nuthin'". Well... most of those people are still earning about $14 an hour in a factory (if they are lucky). Don't get me wrong though... I've also met some idiots that made it through college.. but I've met a LOT more idiots that never went to college.

    Given a choice between someone with a degree and someone without a degree, I'd probably choose the person with the degree for a job.. unless the undegreed person demonstrated exceptional skills and also demonstrated that the ability to learn new skills and to adapt quickly to a changing schedule and work requirements. College teaches you a lot more than how to solve statics problems.

  93. Re:Salvage I by BobGregg · · Score: 1
    >Wasn't this a TV show years ago?

    That's exactly what I thought of! I couldn't think of the name of it for anything; thank goodness for Slashdot and IMDB. Salvage I was a short-lived mutant of the original 1978 TV movie, Salvage, which really was about someone building a cheap rocket in their backyard - to go to the Moon, no less. They built it out of salvaged junk. And ironically, I think (man it's been a long time since I saw it) that the rocket cost about a quarter-million dollars to build. I wonder if that's where the guy got the idea - he would've been about 20 when it was released.

    (Incidentally - "Off Topic"?? Since when did the concept of life-imitating-art-imitating-life become too highbrow for Slashdot? Geez, is it metamod time again already?)

  94. Is that all?? by alien8 · · Score: 1

    It takes to get into space is enough money, and a flight plan? Surely there's gotta be more to it than that, in regards to gov't licences or some such thing, wouldn't there be?!

    1. Re:Is that all?? by Tech187 · · Score: 1

      You've gotta kiss the ring on the NASA director's finger. Then you've got to prove at least 57% of your components were built using Union Labor, fill out 33,234 forms (in triplicate). After which the review process begins, which runs for 37 weeks. Oh, and you're paying the salary of the review staff during that time. They're all seasoned NASA employees, the clerical staff are all Teamsters.

  95. The New York Post by ahde · · Score: 1
    When I first heard about this story, I thought, "Cool, its about time NASA's monopoly gets broken." And then I thought, "Maybe he should try a Sputnik first." And then I read the bit about the FAA wanting a "flight plan" and then I thought about North Korea trying to fire their own rockets. And then I noticed it was the New York Post and it all made sense.

    Follow the link at the bottom of the article and read a couple of other articles if you've never heard of the NY Post

  96. WTF? by niekze · · Score: 1

    A guy building a rocket by himself and not within the confines of a huge rocket company?

    Sound crazy? Just replace "rocket" with "Operating System" and you have the story of Linux. Sure it is oversimplified, but damn, for $250,000 I'm sure he's done something right.

    --


    Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
    1. Re:WTF? by niekze · · Score: 1

      Hmm, replying to me own comment..oh well..

      But I doubt Linus's kernel worked the first time. And it is a little easier, safer, and cheaper for subsequent attempts with a kernel than a rocket launch.

      --


      Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
  97. To the moon, Alice... But not yet. by outrage98 · · Score: 1
    From the Rocket Guy's website:

    Due to increased demands on Rocket Guy's time by the media the launch will be delayed until May 2002.
  98. Hooters by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    Now if NASA had Hooters girls in the 60s, do ya think maybe we would have landed on the moon earlier? I think yes!

    1. Re:Hooters by mj01nir · · Score: 1

      And frankly if it was me I would drink the champange BEFORE I got into the rocket,

      Of course, reentry is likely to cause "a funny feeling in my tummy". Throwing up booze all over a tiny capsule would be something to avoid. Smoking grass on the other hand...

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    2. Re:Hooters by firewort · · Score: 2

      The comedian was seinfeld, and it was a comedy special, I believe his tour immediately following the end of his series.

      On the other hand, I hope Robert Goddard smiles on this guy, and we get to see amatuer rocketry take a leap forward.

      A host is a host from coast to coast, but no one uses a host that's close

      --

    3. Re:Hooters by Papa+Legba · · Score: 2

      I heard a comedian say once (name escapes me at the moment) that all great inovations have been made my man in order to get laid. The whole walking on the moon thing was so those guys could go into a bar and say "see that moon walk, that was me baby!"

      I have a sneaking suspiscion that this falls into that same category if he is expecting Hooters girls at the end.

      And frankly if it was me I would drink the champange BEFORE I got into the rocket, not a lot of driving involved with going up and coming down and it would do wonders for me actually performing this stunt...

      --
      Papa Legba come and open the gate
  99. Perfect for Junkyard Wars!! by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 2

    I can see it now "Teams you have 10 hours to build a rocket to bring you to the moon and back using only parts in the junkyard!!!!"

  100. Isn't Carmack doing the same thing? by ed1park · · Score: 1

    Darwin Award?

    Didn't slashdot have a story on Carmack and his rocket experiments just last week? I believe he wanted to achieve low altitude orbit or something. Sounds very similar to this guy's attempt.

    Should Carmack get a Darwin award too?

  101. Rocket Guy not flying until at least next year... by DaveWood · · Score: 2
    From his website, at the top of the "Updates" page:

    "4/25/01 Due to increased demands on Rocket Guy's time by the media the launch will be delayed until May 2002."

    Is it just me or does this sentence sound a little absurd? Demands on one's time by the media? More likely there's a simpler explanation...

  102. Oh boy... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    I wish him well, but this sounds crazy. I mean, I don't know how easy it is to teach yourself the engineering involved in this kind of adventure. Also, how well did he compensate for the non-ideal reality compared to the ideal world of a physics text?

    I mean, I'll grant that most of NASA's expense is our desire of safety beyond the point of diminishing return. I mean, the 80-20 rule probably applies, 80% of the cost is the last 20%... I mean, NASA can't risk a casualty, he may be willing to risk a 80% survival rate.

    However, this still seems insane, I can't imagine that he has figured EVERYTHING out... Well, good luck and God-speed.

    Alex

  103. Re:Well, if not the Darwin Award, maybe the X Priz by Cheshire+Cat · · Score: 2
    he might actally be the first to collect the X Prize

    The X-Prize goes to someone who can create a vehicle that can send three people into space. This one seats only one.

    However, I really salute this person and I hope he makes it. Good luck!

    --

    Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I'll never know.
  104. Re:jeez, people... by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    Godspeed and good luck, Mr. Walker.. I think I've heard of that before... I think I remember "Godspeed" being defined in physics as 9.8 meters per second squared on earth.

  105. Lawn Darts by Janitor · · Score: 2

    We need to get a couple more of these amature rocket scientists together, paint a big circle in the middle of the desert and turn this into a big game of lawn darts.

  106. Deserves mention by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    This gentleman has successfully completed Russian cosmonaut training. Rocketguy is the shitski.

  107. What About a Test Flight? by stubbie · · Score: 1

    Does this guy not have enough sense to at least blast a manless test flight into space first and see if it works? Or can he not afford to do it twice?

  108. Darwin? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3

    I don't know about the Darwin Award - it takes quite a lot of skill and intelligence to kill yourself like this.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Darwin? by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

      Actually it is called the "Thining the herd" award. It will be duly posted on News of the Weird, with honorable mention. :-)

      --


      ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    2. Re:Darwin? by AndyChrist · · Score: 4

      It takes a lot of skill and intelligence to NOT kill yourself and do it. It takes a bit of skill and intelligence to kill yourself like this. But it also takes the immense amount of stupidity that is required in order to not realise that you don't have the skill and intelligence to survive it.

      Thus, if he dies, he will have eliminated from the world his own lack of ability to assess his own ability, and hopefully any potential genetic causes it might have. He will be a perfect darwin award candidate.

  109. This is his reward? by (void*) · · Score: 4
    According to his plans, a pickup truck will be waiting to drive him to a group of bleachers where fans and 12 Hooters bar girls will pour champagne all over him.

    Considering the odds, he should be asking for more Hooters girls, and he should be getting more than beer and champagne from them! No offense to the girls too - they should feel safe making this bet with him. ;-)

  110. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2
    I wish him luck but I fear the only change he will make to the world will be the crater he leaves behind!

    And the legacy of his exploits documented in email forwards for years to come...
    --

  111. this already happened by tonyt · · Score: 1

    luckily the smashing pumpkins were on hand to tape a moon launch of a rocket contstructed by young kids in a backyard. they put it in a video.

    --
    -=tonyt=-
  112. Re:Ha by fgodfrey · · Score: 2
    Yeah, well, someone does *not* need to go up in this thing on the VERY FIRST FLIGHT! As far as I can tell, there are no test flights of the full system unmanned in the planning.

    Flying on the thing after a successful test flight is risky. Flying on it before one is just plain stupid.

    If he blows himself up, he deserves a Darwin Award not for trying it but for not testing it first.

    --
    Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
  113. Re:Ha by fgodfrey · · Score: 2
    No, the Write Bros. did *not* just get in their plane and try to fly it. They had numerous manned and unmanned test flights of gliders before they tried the powered plane. They performed tests on the engines to make sure the motor wouldn't explode.

    I think there is an award for the first person to manage a flight like this and if he succeeds, he'll get it. I, as an engineer, just can't envision trusting my life to something that hasn't been tested because about 90% of the time, that is a disaster.

    --
    Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
  114. Re:Ha by TrAvELAr · · Score: 1

    Hey.. maybe Taco Bell can sponsor this one too like they did with Mir. If a piece of his craft lands on a target, everyone in America will get a free Chihauha. Good marketing ploy. Yo Quiero

  115. space.com by Animats · · Score: 2

    That's a really frustrating link. It gives the contents of the issue, and the items look clickable, but there's no content there. You have to buy the print magazine.

  116. No way will this work by Animats · · Score: 2

    This thing has neither big fins nor active guidance. It's going to be all over the sky. As someone else pointed out, putting the exhaust near the top doesn't help stability.

  117. Aim? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2

    I like how he says he's just going to shoot 32 miles up in the air, then drift back down and land in roughly the same place he took off from. Think he's heard of "wind"?

  118. el_guano? by el_guapo · · Score: 1

    i'm flattered that you went to the trouble of doing that.

    --
    mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
  119. I hope this doesn't turn into a reality-TV special by 1nt3lx · · Score: 1

    That would be just spectacular. Home-made rocket survivor. Design, construct, launch, and return safely to Earth and you may be a millionaire.

    But, this seems interesting. The mathematics regarding gravity, forces, mass and accelleration are fairly straight-forward, even considering that accelleration isn't constant.

    I am highly impressed with the hydrogen peroxide and silver mesh engine. Why isn't NASA using that? And why isn't he working for NASA?

  120. Cool by talonyx · · Score: 2

    What about support staff? Capcoms and the like? Orbit calculations?

    Sounds a lot like the guy who put baloons on his lawn chair and flew up into the sky... in other words, I don't expect it to end up working too well.

    It would be cool to land 100% civilian people on the moon, though... but that will cost more than $250k.

    1. Re:Cool by Infosquawk · · Score: 1

      Very sad, I guess it shows that ambition and intelligence are no proof against the great cosmic darkness which tears at folks.

      Now, that's a cheery thought!




      OoO
      --


      OoO

      Please do not publish outside of /.
    2. Re:Cool by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      The baloon guy made it down alive, didn't he? I think his only major problem was that he dropped his bb gun so he couldn't shoot he balloons as planned. It wasn't until later that he killed himself. You can't expect someone who would tie a bunch of baloons to a lawn chair and launch himself to 4k ft to be all stable all the time, you know. At least he had something to write about on his tombstone.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    3. Re:Cool by kbuckalo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, he couldn't reconcile the rest of his life with the peak experience of riding a lawn chair and killed himself. The New Yorker did a story on this a while back. Very sad, I guess it shows that ambition and intelligence are no proof against the great cosmic darkness which tears at folks.

  121. Re:Ha by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    Momentum will carry Walker and his capsule up to 32 miles, where he will experience several moments of weightlessness and then begin to fall back toward Earth.

    What the hell does "several moments" mean? Maybe 5-10 microfortnights?

  122. carrying on after wilbur and orville by small_dick · · Score: 5

    Many people called the Wright brothers nuts, and they made their stuff out of bicycle parts.

    Both dropped out of High School.

    They acheived flight w/o government/public money -- only what they earned via a printing business, then a bicycle shop.

    I think he is carrying on a fine tradition where one person with guts can make a big impact on the world.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
    1. Re:carrying on after wilbur and orville by ExInferus · · Score: 2

      Yes, he may well make quite a big impact on the world should this not go favorably... a noble goal nontheless :>.

      ExInferus

    2. Re:carrying on after wilbur and orville by blair1q · · Score: 2

      The Wright Brothers' "impact" was only visible in retrospect and as a result of legend-building by the aerospace industry.

      They were only one of dozens of teams out to achieve the same goal, and only by slightly better skill and knowledge, and significantly better luck, were they the first not to fail.

      Remember also that it wasn't for five years after they performed their first powered flight that they recorded their first sale of a powered aircraft.

      Until that sale, to the U.S. Army, many people disbelieved they had actually done what they claimed.

      But by that time there were others who had accomplished the feat, and perhaps hundreds who had seen airplanes flying in person.

      And also by that time, and for several hundred years before, there were many attempts that ended extremely badly.

      Heck, they didn't even bother to get a patent for the first three years of their success.

      (Wright State U. Special Collections has online more documentation than you'll ever want to read about this unless you throw a shoe and become a biographical historian - and it's just a catalog!)

      I'm with those who think that it would be suicide to ride this thing into the sky the first time it's launched. There's no reason a sandbag and some remote control gear couldn't go as a test, except pure stupidity.

      Even if he succeeds, what will he have proved?

      That rockets fly? It's been done.

      That peroxide and silver make a propulsion unit? It's been done.

      That hypercomplex systems can work on the first try? Not any more than any other Lottery has proved that you can win the first time you buy a ticket.

      --Blair

  123. Wow. by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    I am simply in awe of this. I cannot think of anything to say. I have only a tiny fraction of the motivation that this guy must have... I would like to keep my life comfortable, nothing more! I applaud this "Rocket Boy."

  124. Re:Quick question by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    The Honeymooners, a TV series from the 50's/60's. The character played by Jackie Gleason, when riled up by his character wife Alice, would threaten to beat his wife with a punch that sent her "to the moon". Of course, this being over 40 years ago, he never actually did it...

  125. A modest proposal by Chagrin · · Score: 2
    This mission is far too dangerous to risk a valuable human life on. I believe that, instead of Brian Walker, we should put Jon Katz in the rocket. Even if the rocket explodes the mission will still be a success!

    ...it also removes the second airbag requirement.

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  126. Private space projects by Chagrin · · Score: 2

    The best one I've seen is JP Aerospace. Their progress may be slow, but it's steady .. and they're certainly targeting some pretty high altitudes! Hopefully we'll see some information on their May 5/6th launch soon.

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  127. Website by tspilman · · Score: 1


    Check his website at www.rocketguy.com.

    --
    Tom the Sigless
  128. Re:jeez, people... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I agree, it seems that today, corporations have lost any will to innovate, meanwhile it's the private citizens that make the breakthroughs. Re-useable rockets being one example, but I think solar powered cars are the best way to visualize corporate complacency. I could go out right now and build a working solar powered car... That is, if I had the money to invest, and some company behind me to sell it can defend the patent. But that's a different story.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  129. Re:If it is true, then.. by enneff · · Score: 1

    "Then again, he makes toys for a living, he's not your average businessman (his loss)."

    I don't see how you can equate him not being a businessman to being 'his loss'. Would you rather be a shrewd businessman, or an extremely talented inventor capable of designing, constructing, and launching your own manned space craft?

    I know what I'd prefer.

  130. Hooters by mill5ja · · Score: 2

    According to his plans, a pickup truck will be waiting to drive him to a group of bleachers where fans and 12 Hooters bar girls will pour champagne all over him.

    Hahaha, sounds to me like buddy has it all worked out.
    :-D

  131. You must mean Dayton, OH by egc4ever · · Score: 1

    The Wright Brothers were from Dayton, OH. I've seen the bike shop there. 'Nuff said.

  132. This may have been said before by notcarlos · · Score: 1

    ... but I'm too lazy to read through the three thousand lamers and phreaks to care.

    Anyway, I'd like to remind you that when Heinlein's kids went to the moon with a rocket built in their backyard (with an atomic pile in the rocket, I remind you), there were space Nazis up there already. Unless he can sing Deustchlund Uber Alles, he'd best watch out.

    (I'm not a Nazi, I'm just warning, that's all. Read some Heinlein and figure it out for yourself.)

    Geek Culture killed my dog/
    and I don't think it's fair...

    --
    io hymen hymnaee io
    io hymen hymnaee
  133. Re:Ha by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

    hey, you never know, he might be ok.. this isn't rocket science or anythi... oh, hehe...

  134. Re:Ummm... by elegant7x · · Score: 2

    I might be missing something here (my physics is total crap), but don't all objects accelerate downwards due to gravity at the same rate, regardless of mass?

    Not unless they are in a vaccume.

    Rate me on picture-rate.com

    --

    "and dear god does this website suck now." -- CmdrTaco
  135. Still no by elegant7x · · Score: 2

    Acceleration is the derivative of velocity which is the change in position over time. Acceleration is the change in velocity over time. Every object is pulled on with a force of ~9.8 Newtons, and would accelerate at that rate if there were no other forces But there are (wind resistance). Objects are not 'accelerated' equally by gravity they are pulled equally by gravity. Acceleration is the result of the pulling, not the cause.

    Rate me on picture-rate.com

    --

    "and dear god does this website suck now." -- CmdrTaco
  136. Salvage I by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    Wasn't this a TV show years ago?

    If he makes it back alive, he'll be starting a Travel service and a Timeshare on the Moon. He could have the remaining cast from Gilligan's Island for spokes-people.

  137. I did this once! My story of the rocket: by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    In my freshman year in high school, I did a little research on rocket science, and drew up some plans for a rocket that I figured could do just about what he was planning. Go 30 miles up and then fall back down. But I couldn't realistically go up in the rocket, so I planned on putting in 50 kilos of fireworks and a remote control detonator or something (it ended up being timed because that was easier). Also that way I didn't need parachutes or anything.

    So anyway, a few more calculations said that this whole thing would cost me $120000, so I went to a local bank to take out the loan, and we finally made the agreement that I would put their name and phone number on the side of the rocket, and there would be a fairly high interest rate on the thing too. [Lucky for me, this was only a one-branch bank].

    Now that I had my money, I set out to build the rocket. It only took me a few months, and I had the whole thing ready to go and everything. I was going to do it after school on a Friday, and the night before, I rented out an entire park with the money I had left, and set the launch up and hid the rocket under some branches.

    Unfortunately, one of my friends found out where the rocket was set up to launch, and he skipped school that day and went to the launch site, with the intent to launch the thing without my permission, and to be the guy when the media showed up. Now, as I'm told, when he pulled the camoflage off the rocket, he misaligned the launch platform, and the rocket would now have to resetup for launch. But, being an idiot, he did not know that. So he pressed the launch button on my computer on the other side of the field, and launch it did. Apparently (I was not there to see it lift off, though I did see it in flight from class), the launch was spectacular, and looked much better than the NASA launches. Well, the small launch pad problem escalated to a huge problem during the flight. Instead of flying straight up and exploding, the rocket turned over on its side about 75 feet above the ground and whizzed past all the buildings in the city at speeds that should have been over 1000 mph, and judging by the blast created by breaking the sound barrier, it may have been nearly there.

    The rocket barely cleared my school, and knocked most of us on out collective arses, so to speak, blast. Knowing that my friend wasn't in school, and fearing the worst, hoping it wasn't true, but knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was, I ran to the roof just in time to see the rocket's final seconds. I knew the explosives should be going off any second, and the fuel should expire just a moment before the detonation. The fire behind the rocket extinguished, and I instinctively covered my ears, waiting for the (hopefully) tremendous explosion. It was several seconds longer than I had expected, which disappointed me to no end. Until the end of my disappointment, just a few seconds later when the explosives lit off, and basically vaporized 6 city blocks. At the center of those 6 city blocks was the bank that I had gotten the loan from. Everything they had had been destroyed by the explosion. Along with a prison, a police station, and a few office buildings (most of which wasn't my fault, I swear! There was a gas station nearby that also exploded, and that was probably a completely unrelated coincidence).

    The only person related to the bank was the owner/manager, who was on his way back from vacation in Montana. What a freakin' loony, on vacation in Montana?? Anyway, someone had managed to take a picture of the rocket in flight, and dead-center in the middle of it sat the name of the bank that blew up, and the phone number. The city blamed the owner of the bank, and sued him for something to do with the millions of dollars of damage that were caused (by him). Since all his records had been destroyed in the blast, he could not prove to them that he had granted a loan to someone else to build a rocket and put his number on it. Of course, nobody believed him, and he was persecuted to the full extent of the law. Either that, or they just gave him a friendly slap on the wrist and told him to run along now.

    And that is the story of how I built a rocket destined for space, but instead of going to space, it blew up the financing bank. And the guy who owned the crater which used to be a bank got blamed, while I got off scot-free and laughed all the way to the bank. So to speak.

    And then I found fifty bucks.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  138. Re:Ha by norculf · · Score: 1

    Some people don't think attacking someones life's work is a joke.

  139. Re:Ha by norculf · · Score: 1

    It's his life to use as he wishes to acheive his dream. Linus only needed to spend a lot of time coding. He was doing that anyway. No big sacrifice needed. This guy is risking his life, because someone needs to go up in this thing and he wants to do it. His dream happens to require that kind of risk. That doesn't make it a stupid idea.

  140. Re:Ha by norculf · · Score: 2

    "If I die, I die," he scoffs. "I'd rather die trying this than spend the next 40 years bitter than I never made the attempt."

    "Funny, I'd rather live for those 40 years."

    He'd rather do somthing significant with his life. You apparantly don't. What's the problem? The only glitch could be the Federal Aviation Administration, which has demanded that Walker produce a flight plan and details of his rocket design before it issues a permit for his launch. "If they are not going to grant me permission to launch, I'll just take the whole thing across the border to Mexico," Walker says.

    "Great, and then Tostitos can sponsor the flight. That's all we need: corn chips and salsa raining down in the Pacific instead of Mir..."

    How the hell did you come to that conclusion? The article doesn't say anyone is sponsering him at all. And just because he's launching from Mexico doesn't mean a producer of Pseudo-Mexican food would be sponsering the thing and insisting he load his rocket with their products instead of things like fuel. Besides, corn chips and salsa won't damage the Pacific ocean nearly as much as the space slime growing inside Mir.

  141. Degree != Intelligence by ellem · · Score: 2

    --Someone somewhere told me (maybe I read it):

    Intelligence is knowing what you don't know.

    (and by extension learning those things.)

    --I wish the guy luck, and the ability to not turn into Tomatoe Surprise.
    ---

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  142. Re:Ummm... by slashdoter · · Score: 1
    my physics is total crap

    well I got a "c" this spring so get out the salt when you read this. At 20 miles there is still be some amount of air, lets us asumme that the gas contaner is empty and it's mass it a lot less than the capsle. The large light gas can will slow down much faster. Think of playing catch with a baseball and an empty coke can. you can throw the can as hard as you want but it will still slow down much faster than the ball. The formula for kenetic energy is KE=(1/2)mv^2 as the two split you can see how most of the mass will stay with the capsle, So it will have a large m value. both have the same speed so v is the same for both. just plug in the numbers and you will see that to start with ( before air is taken in to acount) the capsle will have more energy to keep it going. then gravity and air will slow the tank much faster than the capsle. Any one else want to chime in here


    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  143. Re:Watch out... by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

    Probably why he's using the desert in eastern Oregon. That covers more than half the state... if he crashes he'll create a big dust cloud. that's it.

  144. Don't Dis The Honeymooners by PingXao · · Score: 1

    Ralph Kramden had a LOT more on the ball than this guy. I would sacrifice all my karma whoring points to make this clear. I already un-slashed Jon Katz from my front /. page. Please don't dis the Honeymooners! It was and is the BEST show on television. Thank you.

    Any relation to Trolls or their heirs is totally unintentional!

  145. Re:I hope this doesn't turn into a reality-TV spec by Ig0r · · Score: 2

    Because hydrogen peroxide is extremely inefficiant and extremely dangerous to handle.
    One flake of the wrong kind of substance in the fuel tank and the whole thing blows up. I would rather store my oxidizer seperately from the fuel.

    --

    --
    Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
  146. That's a lot of money by brad3378 · · Score: 1


    ....Wouldn't it be cheaper to just fake a trip to the moon? Graphic artists are a relative bargain now-a-days with photoshop technology.

    --

  147. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by Mortimer+Snerd · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't Dennis Titto have the altitude record for a private citizen now though?

  148. His website by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

    Check this out!

    rocketguy.com

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
  149. Re:jeez, people... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

    "he just wants to have champagne poured on him by Hooters girls."

    You say that like it's a bad thing...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  150. Creationist Award by slyrp · · Score: 3

    I don't know about the Darwin Award - it takes quite a lot of skill and intelligence to kill yourself like this
    Maybe "they" should invent a new award called the creationist award which celebrates skilful and intelligent people who kill themselves - Proof that evolution doesn't provide the best of breed necessary to have created the race we are now.

    pah!

    slyrp
    1. Re:Creationist Award by purdue_thor · · Score: 1

      Check out the Ig Noble awards. I think this guy could be a candidate (provided he lives - don't know if they give them posthumously). From their website:
      WHAT: The Ig Nobel Prize honors individuals whose achievements "cannot or should not be reproduced." Ten prizes are given to people who have done remarkably goofy things -- some of them admirable, some perhaps otherwise. WHY: The Igs are intended to celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative -- and spur people's interest in science, medicine, and technology.

    2. Re:Creationist Award by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      All it proves is that intelligence is not the primary success factor for reproduction.

      (That explains a lot, doesn't it.)


      -------------------------------------
      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  151. Re:Incompetence and the assessment thereof by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Yes, I did read that paper a few weeks before posting that.

  152. violent reaction by Bobby+Orr · · Score: 1
    For the next 85 seconds, pure hydrogen peroxide will pour out of a giant fuel tank and over a silver screen, creating a violent chemical reaction that will push the rocket upward at four times the speed of sound - about 2,200 mph.

    Either that, or the violent reaction will spread his ashes from here to the Gobi Desert.

    1. Re:violent reaction by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

      This reaction is taking place in a special designed combustion chamber. It has been designed to contain the pressure of the Hydrogen Peroxide decomp many times over. These gasses are then directed out of a Delaval nozzle which expands and accelerates them. It is not some random dumbing of decombosing Peroxide. This reation is actually quite safe compared to normal liquid fuel rockets which rely on the complete mixing of two liquids. And which are prone to instable cobustion from splashing & hard starting from incorrect mixtures, which can lead to explosions. The Peroxide reaction basicly creates super hot STEAM see 2xH202=2xH20+02 Before rejecting something out right you need to do more research becomme educated. Dont believe everything you read in the press dude, because they usally fuck information up to make a story. Ie " Man devises well thought out plan to design, build and fly a low cost manned rocket vehicle" Becomes " Toy inventor plans to launch himself in BACKYARD rocket" Dont believe the hype..

  153. Flight plan? by magarity · · Score: 3
    What kind of flight plan does the FAA expect?

    Waypoint 1: Up
    Final destination: Back down

    1. Re:Flight plan? by goodhell · · Score: 1
      Landing in the desert??

      Sounds like a communistic plot!!

      Make Yuri Proud!!!!

    2. Re:Flight plan? by tdsotf · · Score: 5

      Not too far off :). He could go to http://www.duats.com and fill out an FAA Flight Plan. It'd end up looking something like this:

      1) Type (IFR/VFR/DVFR): IFR
      2) Aircraft Identification: EARTHSTAR1
      3) Aircraft Type: ROCKET, Heavy, No Transponder
      4) True Airspeed (kts): 2,200
      5) Departure Point: Oregon Desert
      6) Proposed Departure Time: May 2002
      7) Cruising Altitude: 158,400ft
      8) Route of Flight: Up, Down
      9) Destination: Oregon Desert
      10) Est. Time Enroute: 100 seconds
      11) Remarks: "It may be a technical dream but he's just crazy enough to push that button."
      12) Fuel on Board: Lots
      13) Alternate Airport: Mexico Desert
      14) Pilot Name: Brian Walker
      Address: 2002 Darwin Award Ave, Oregon
      Phone: 555-RKIT-GUY
      Aircraft Home Base: Oregon
      15) Number aboard: 1
      16) Color of Aircraft: Rocket-Gray
      17) Destination Contact: Hooters girls
      Phone: 555-4HOOTERS

  154. According to his website.. by proxima · · Score: 1

    "Due to increased demands on Rocket Guy's time by the media the launch will be delayed until May 2002".

    I guess the New York Post is just taking up soo much of his time.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  155. If it is true, then.. by proxima · · Score: 2

    First - I share the belief with some others that this story is fake, considering the source. However, if it is true, then I think his chances of survival are tiny.

    That said, I think it'd be incredibly interesting to browse through a detailed website showing how he came up with his ideas, what he used to make it, and how and with whom he built it. I want to see pictures of this thing. I'd love to see pictures/video of it blast off (assuming this is all real, of course).

    Also, if he had that $250k back in 1990, he coulda easily made $20 million by 1999 with it (with stocks like Cisco and Dell). Then he'd have had a nice cozy ride with cosmonauts for 6 days like our buddy Tito. Then again, he makes toys for a living, he's not your average businessman (his loss).

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:If it is true, then.. by proxima · · Score: 2

      Nevermind. I stand corrected (even though nobody flamed me, yet). Rocketguy has a website. Time to browse.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    2. Re:If it is true, then.. by Tech187 · · Score: 2

      My Grandpa, in the 1960's, made what he called a 'Ski-Doo' out of parts from an old Studebaker. It had a wooden frame.

      I grew up admiring him, but I'm glad he didn't try to build a rocket.

  156. Do they care? by fishexe · · Score: 1

    I don't think they /care/ if he's going to blow himself up, as long as he's filed a flight plan so they know /where/ he's going to do it. If it's just him it's not really their biz if it's untested, he has to test it somehow, after all.

    Ever get the impression that your life would make a good sitcom?
    Ever follow this to its logical conclusion: that your life is a sitcom?

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  157. Rocket Photographs by searleb · · Score: 1

    Brian Walker's webpage (www.rocketguy.com) gives info about his rocket shows photographs. You can also see some of his other wacky inventions.

    1. Re:Rocket Photographs by searleb · · Score: 1

      All of the photos of the completed rocket (that I noticed) are of a prototype he built. He has, however, posted photos of components he's built and the human centrifuge with which he will build up high gravity tolerances. He's not planning on being done until May 2002 (not this fall, as the NYPost article reports) so he's got a bit to go. Also, he's gone through cosmonaut training and flown a MIG fighter, so it can't all be BS.

    2. Re:Rocket Photographs by Technician · · Score: 2

      Great Photos. However this definately shows this is a publicity stunt. Take a good look at the capsule photos. Notice anything important missing? Like maybe somekind of latch to hold it closed? This was never designed to be pressurised. One atmosphere of pressure on the inside will blow it open as shown in the photo.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Rocket Photographs by Baddas · · Score: 1

      Realize also that he's only going 30 miles up, about 150,000 feet. That's not space, that's low pressure. Still needs pressurization, unless he suits up, but not as suicidal as fiberglass shell in outer space... Man I hope he has tested a mini...

  158. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by searleb · · Score: 1

    Actually, Mr. Walker is likely a brilliant man. He is a self made millionare as an inventor. Although only his toys have been marketable, he's produced some other really cool projects (a recreational hovercraft and submarine) and is taking his project seriously (he has trained as a cosmonaut, flown a MIG fighter, and has been training on a human centrifuge).

    In the end, he is going about the project in the correct manor. He's aiming at only 30 seconds outside of the atmosphere and he's using an extremely simple propulsion system. His plan is so simple, it just might work.

  159. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by loraksus · · Score: 1
    yeah, which is why I was wondering whether an official flight plan was filed. The FAA person I talked to knew nothing.

    I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  160. Re:Info on Mexico? by loraksus · · Score: 1
    No, I don't think the legal aspect is the problem, but I'm sure that it is not going to fit in the back of one semi - perhaps two or three. Then you have re assembly etc..

    I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  161. Good Luck by loraksus · · Score: 2
    I guess.

    But I'll believe it when I see it.

    I'd say the cost of the materials alone would easily exceed $250k.

    It'd be cool if the guy poseted to /. some of his ideas.

    And as for "moving across the border", I severley doubt that you can pack this up into a truck and move it over the border.

    What the hell happened to all these private space projects? The stratospheric skydiving seemed to die out, as did the manned launch to space a while back, they were going out to launch out of the ocean or something.

    Perhaps a comprehensive slashback would be cool.

    I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  162. I'd like to see this. Seriously. by loraksus · · Score: 3
    The only glitch could be the Federal Aviation Administration, which has demanded that Walker produce a flight plan.

    I fell out of the chair laughing.

    Incidentall, did Nasa have to file flight plans during the shuttle launches? They'd be interesting to see.

    I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by testpoint · · Score: 1

      Neil Armstrong was required to submit a customs declaration for the moon rocks he brought back.

    2. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      Incidentall, did Nasa have to file flight plans during the shuttle launches? They'd be interesting to see.

      Never underestimate the stupidity of bureaucracy. Remember, the Apollo 11 crew had to file U.S. Customs declarations for their "imported" rocks from the Moon...

    3. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by CheechBG · · Score: 1

      I don't know if NASA has to, given that they are a federally funded and subsidized agency, like the FAA. One would assume that the FAA has very easy access to the flight plans, if any of NASA, and files them themselves.

    4. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by banuaba · · Score: 1

      Neil Armstrong, et al had to fill out customs documents when they got back from the moon..
      Brant

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    5. Re:I'd like to see this. Seriously. by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      If I recall right, NASA used to have fighter jets out there to ensure clear air space for some distance around the Cape. I doubt if you would call it a formal "flight plan", but I'm sure that air traffic control is aware of all launches.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  163. Re:slow down by SnapShot · · Score: 1

    FAA doesn't approve it. So what? They give him a fine if he makes it down alive. If he doesn't survive they fine his estate?

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
  164. My names Fred G. Sanford... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    The G is for Goddard.

  165. If only NASA were like this! by Ayatollah · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    According to his plans, a pickup truck will be waiting to drive him to a group of bleachers where fans and 12 Hooters bar girls will pour champagne all over him.

    Sounds like a lot of fun. Of course, travelling at "four times the speed of sound" might be a bit more intense than cheering fans and a dozen Hooters girls, but not by much.

    Also from the article:

    During re-entry, a giant airbag will deploy to slow the descent.

    I'm thinking an airbag won't help much no matter how giant it is. Maybe if it just deploys on impact.


    .

  166. Re:Weightlessness? by RadioTV · · Score: 1

    Anyone can experience weightlessness. Go to your local airport and plop down ~$100 for a plane and pilot for an hour and tell them what you want. I have experienced both zero Gs and 4+ Gs for several seconds in a single engine plane less that 3000 feet off the ground.

    --
    I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
  167. a role model for dropouts everywhere by gdulli · · Score: 1

    This guy is so my hero if this is not a hoax and he makes it.

    Those who can, learn. Those who can't, sit in a classroom.

  168. Ha by Fervent · · Score: 1
    "If I die, I die," he scoffs. "I'd rather die trying this than spend the next 40 years bitter than I never made the attempt."

    Funny, I'd rather live for those 40 years.

    The only glitch could be the Federal Aviation Administration, which has demanded that Walker produce a flight plan and details of his rocket design before it issues a permit for his launch.

    "If they are not going to grant me permission to launch, I'll just take the whole thing across the border to Mexico," Walker says.

    Great, and then Tostitos can sponsor the flight. That's all we need: corn chips and salsa raining down in the Pacific instead of Mir...

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Ha by Fervent · · Score: 2

      Some people apparently can't take a joke.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:Ha by isorox · · Score: 2

      good thing Columbus didnt think that...

    3. Re:Ha by GigsVT · · Score: 1
      His life's work so far has been to drop out of school, do some worthless shit

      Sounds like Billy G.
      -

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Ha by multicsfan · · Score: 1

      He's not doing anything real complicated like LOX and Liquid hydrogen. It sounds much closer to a WW2 V-2 rocket then anything modern. Acutually, simpler then a V2. I believe that the V2 used LOX and alcohol with H2O2 powered fuel pumps (IIRC).

      IIRC Tbe engineers/scientists had recommended against a launch but management overrode their concerns.

      There are also several private rocket companies working on reusable and/or cheap boosters. I haven't kept up to date, but I believe there has been a couple test launches. Try this link for some more information http://www.discover.com/april_99/rockets.html

    5. Re:Ha by JediTrainer · · Score: 3

      Last I heard, Taco Bell was planning on giving everyone in Oregon a free Fajita if Walker lands on one of the Hooter girls.

      Apparently it won't matter if he's intact or not.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    6. Re:Ha by kalashnikov556 · · Score: 1
      Is there really any such thing anymore? There's rocket engineering, and space science, but is there any actual new rocket science?

      If you like the war on drugs, you're gonna just love the war on guns

  169. Apples and oranges? by phandel · · Score: 2

    One thing I keep learning as I get older, there are a lot of idiots with degrees out there,
    [snip]
    My step-father on the other hand can do about anything he wants.


    True, although you're comparing two different aptitudes ... the theoretical realm and the practical realm. Historically, the owners of the most brilliant theoretical minds have had quite some difficulty applying these wonderful ideas.

    This does bring up the always intriguing argument about what actually defines intelligence. Currently, one of my favorite definitions is "The ability to relate two unrelated thoughts/items/etc.".

    1. Re:Apples and oranges? by Eldonv · · Score: 1

      What defines intelligence? Having both tea and "no tea" at the same time.

  170. In all seriousness... by glowingspleen · · Score: 5

    Of all the famous people that we get an Ask _____ about, why not this guy? Seriously, someone from /. should contact this guy and set him up with an interview. By the sound of his intent, I bet he'd be happy to do it. And we could get some great info from him about his attempt (since we realistically might not be able to talk with him AFTER the attempt, God forbid)

    1. Re:In all seriousness... by darrick · · Score: 1
      NO! Don't waste his time! He's had to postpone his launch because of media interviews. Enough already; let him go!

      Besides, we've seen how the /. community responds to his efforts: like a bunch of uninformed, stupid-ass idiots (mostly; a few posts are decent).

  171. He might make it... by Karl_Hungus · · Score: 5



    After all, this is rocket science, not brain surgery.

    1. Re:He might make it... by decaying · · Score: 1
      ...in a related story....
      Man flies to moon, does brain surgery on self
      The man who spent $250,000 to engineer himself into space, will next attempt to land on the moon and give himself a lobotomy.....
      --
      ----- One piece short of Legoland
  172. Re:Easy access to space. by obsessively+puzzled · · Score: 1

    But if he's unsuccessful think of all the "this is why we don't let the masses do this" fud we're gonna hear from those in charge. Worse yet is if he hurts someone else. The article doesn't go in to what safeguards he may or may not have taken or who has looked over his designs.

  173. Ummm... by cthugha · · Score: 2

    At an altitude of about 30 miles, the fuel tank will detach and parachute back to Earth, hopefully to be used again.

    Momentum will carry Walker and his capsule up to 32 miles, where he will experience several moments of weightlessness and then begin to fall back toward Earth.

    I might be missing something here (my physics is total crap), but don't all objects accelerate downwards due to gravity at the same rate, regardless of mass? In which case, if this nutter does get up to 32 miles in his capsule, won't his fuel tank follow him (since both objects are moving at roughly the same velocity, ignoring the minor delta-v imparted during detachment)? Unless, of course, his capsule has boosters (or his tank has retros) we aren't being told about.

    Needless to say, this may cause problems of the collision kind when both start falling to earth together...

    1. Re:Ummm... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      You are missing something here... air resistance. In this case air resistance pushes *BOTH* things downwards, however because the tank is no longer full, its density will be smaller than that of the pod, thus it will feel more accelleration from the air (think basketball vs. beachball). To move upwards two miles coasting in an airless environment, the pod would have to have a velocity of approximately 600 miles per hour (v = sqrt(2*g*h)) upwards, which is a very reasonable speed for a small rocket to attain.

      The air up there will of course be much thinner than it is at ground level, however it should be more than enough to make a signifigant difference in the trajectories of the two objects. Air resistance is roughly proportional to the speed of the object moving through the viscous medium, so that large speed will mean a large difference in trajectories (the forces themselves will be large, so the differences will be more pronounced than, say, a microscopic force would be).

      Yay, I used my freshman physics :)

    2. Re:Ummm... by davemj · · Score: 1

      Not quite, objects in a vaccum prove that all objects have the same acceleration regardless of mass, when they are in atmosphere air resistance has an effect one the object All object on the planet are accelerated towards the planet at the rate of (approx) 10 metres/sec/sec David

  174. If he thinks mexico will let him fly... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    From a friend who actually knows something:

    "if he thinks he can get permission from AST he's out of his mind. And if he thinks Mexico will let him if the FAA says no, he's living in a fantasy world because the first thing the Mexicans will do is call the FAA and ask if they've given him permission to fly and if not, why not."

    Aparrantly:

    "_Everyone_ has tried to talk to this guy and he won't listen. Yes, he's nuts and he's probably just smart enough to get himself killed."

    Mike Massee

    1. Re:If he thinks mexico will let him fly... by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

      Off course the AST wont give him his licence they are Government department in place to serve the interest of large corporations...Just have a look at the unreasnable conditions they placed on CATS prise contestants.

  175. Easy access to space. by bl968 · · Score: 1

    The problem currently with manned access to space is simply that in the United States NASA is a monopoly. They have no interest in allowing anyone but NASA to provide access to space. If they did then this would risk NASA's congressional funding. Lets hope if successful this would lead to the break up of NASA's monopoly and by doing so open space to the masses!


    --
    When I'm good I'm very good, when I'm bad I'm better, But when I'm evil you better run :P

    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
  176. Info on Mexico? by dstone · · Score: 2

    I severley doubt that you can pack this up into a truck and move it over the border

    Why? It's powered by steam and hydrogen peroxide (common for first aid or bleaching hair, and easily aquired at the drug store), and made of steel. I'm simplifying, but the materials sound quite legal, and it doesn't sound to me like it would be classified as drugs, dangerous chemicals, weaponry, or explosives.

    Albeit his invention is pretty unconventional, but does someone with experience or from Mexico know if there's actually a Mexican law that this contraption would break? Or once down there, is there a Mexican "FAA" to worry about?

    1. Re:Info on Mexico? by Vuarnet · · Score: 2

      Well there is a Mexican "FAA" to worry about, but I don't think that's much the issue here. Neither is there any law (as far as I can remember) against space flight. But there are legal permits to be obtained regarding the use of explosives, even for fireworks, maybe those would have to be cleared beforehand.


      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Info on Mexico? by anon757 · · Score: 1

      Pure H2O2, as opposed to the 5% stuff you get in stores, is most certianly a controlled substance as it is highly reactive, and therefore dangerous. What's he going to say at the border... nothing to declare, just a rocket and enough explosives to level a small city? Ok, go on through sir. Anyway, good luck to him, i hope he really does succeed. And hint to him, you dont really need FAA approval to launch the rocket. Sure you might get in some trouble from them when you land, but who'se going to throw the first civilian astronaut in jail?

  177. Wisdom from /usr/local/bin/fortune by metafoobar · · Score: 2
    A Severe Strain on the Credulity

    As a method of sending a missile to the higher, and even to the highest parts of the earth's atmospheric envelope, Professor Goddard's rocket is a practicable and therefore promising device. It is when one considers the multiple-charge rocket as a traveler to the moon that one begins to doubt... for after the rocket quits our air and really starts on its journey, its flight would be neither accelerated nor maintained by the explosion of the charges it then might have left. Professor Goddard, with his "chair" in Clark College and countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to re-action, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react... Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.

    -- New York Times Editorial, 1920
    In short, doubt not without a reason. If he splats, at least he tried. Me, I am developing callouses in rather uncomfortable places from sitting in front of a screen all day. Which is a better way to go is open for discussion.

  178. More from Before by QuantumFTL · · Score: 3

    This article previously on slashdot provides a useful prospective. It's interesting to look at where he was then, and how close he is now. I honestly hope it works.... would be nice to see that you can get into space without being an astronaut, or more money than a small country. Just my two cents.

  179. Watch out... by amanb · · Score: 3

    A college dropout who attended just two semesters of engineering school, Walker will be staking his life on how well he has been able to teach himself rocket science.

    I'm staying indoors

    1. Re:Watch out... by pcidevel · · Score: 1
      Probably why he's using the desert in eastern Oregon. That covers more than half the state... if he crashes he'll create a big dust cloud. that's it.

      HEY!, those of us in western Oregon are a little worried, of course I'm hoping that he'll let an audience attend... I'd love to watch this guy succeed or blow himself up.. I mean, it's the chance of a lifetime to actually get to view a darwin award in the making!

      --

      I thought someone said there was going to be free beer!

    2. Re:Watch out... by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. We shouldn't underestimate the destructive power of this guy, either. Sure, if it just turns into a fireball on launch, the rest of us will be no worse off, but if he happened to crash that thing, it'd cause quite a bit of damage.

  180. Re:He's not the first! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    Another civilian who attempted to go into space, Christa McAuliffe, died aboard the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986.

    Well, I may be wrong, but as far as I remember she was a teacher chosen amongst thousands to give some lessons from orbit to eath over video. This is not in the same leage as Tito and this wacko, because she woudn't have funded it herself. She was lucky to be chosen, unlucky to pick the only space shuttle that blew up in history.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  181. Xephran Cochran by Yossi · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is for Sarek of Vulcan to be flying nearby and detect his warp trace. Then the Vulcans will know that we are not primitive for them. (For the Treck illiterate: Xephran Cochran was an amature rocketeer who invented the warp drive. On his first flight Sarek of Vulcan detected his warp train and the rest is history...well maybe not history exactly...)

    --
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I won't listen"
  182. I would have ... by AndrewD · · Score: 3

    ... a higher opinion of this man's engineering skills and intelligence if he'd planned an unmanned test first.

    Bad enough you should ride in a vehicle with untested fabrication. Sheer lunacy to ride in one with untested design as well...

    --

    -- AndrewD

    A Maze of Twisty Little Laws, All Different.

  183. A failure. by delfstrom · · Score: 2
    The facts are a little different. He only spent 2 hours aloft, not 14. He soon felt numb from the cold, sent out a Mayday over citizens band radio. After shooting a few balloons, he lost his pistol overboard. Finally, he crashed into a power line, briefly blacking out a small area in Long Beach. (source: The New York Times 3 July 1982)

    He was fined by the FAA. A decade later, he killed himself.

    From The Los Angeles Times, 24 November 1993 (by Myrna Oliver, Times Staff Writer)

    Larry Walters, who achieved dubious fame in 1982 when he piloted a lawn chair attached to helium balloons 16,000 feet above Long Beach, has committed suicide at the age of 44.

    Walters died Oct. 6 after hiking to a remote spot in Angeles National Forest and shooting himself in the heart, his mother, Hazel Dunham, revealed Monday. She said relatives knew of no motive for the suicide. "It was something I had to do," Walters told The Times after his flight from San Pedro to Long Beach on July 2, 1982. "I had this dream for 20 years, and if I hadn't done it, I would have ended up in the funny farm."

    Walters rigged 42 weather balloons to an aluminum lawn chair, pumped them full of helium and had two friends untether the craft, which he had dubbed "Inspiration I."

    He took along a large bottle of soda, a parachute and a portable CB radio to alert air traffic to his presence. He also took a camera but later admitted, "I was so amazed by the view I didn't even take one picture."

    Walters, a North Hollywood truck driver with no pilot or ballon training, spent about two hours aloft and soared up to 16,000 feet -- three miles -- startling at least two airline pilots and causing one to radio the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Shivering in the high altitude, he used a pellet gun to pop balloons to come back to earth. On the way down, his balloons draped over power lines, blacking out a Long Beach neighborhood for 20 minutes.

    The stunt earned Walters a $1,500 fine from the FAA, the top prize from the Bonehead Club of Dallas, the altitude record for gas-filled clustered balloons (which could not be officially recorded because he was unlicensed and unsanctioned) and international admiration. He appeared on "The Tonight Show" and was flown to New York to be on "Late Night With David Letterman," which he later described as "the most fun I've ever had."

    "I didn't think that by fulfilling my goal in life -- my dream -- that would create such a stir," he later told The Times, "and make people laugh."

    Walters abandoned his truck-driving job and went on the lecture circuit, remaining sporadically in demand at motivational seminars. But he said he never made much money from his innovative flight and was glad to keep his simple lifestyle.

    He gave his "aircraft" -- the aluminum lawn chair -- to admiring neighborhood children after he landed, later regretting it.

    In recent years, Walters hiked the San Gabriel Mountains and did volunteer work for the U.S. Forest Service.

    "I love the peace and quiet," he told The Times in 1988. "Nature and I get along real well."

    An Army vetern who served in Vietnam, Walters never married and had no children. He is survived by his mother and two sisters.

    If something can go wrong, it will. That is why I think RocketGuy won't have a smooth ride, either. I wonder what safety factor he's building into his system?

  184. He's not the first! by delfstrom · · Score: 2
    On RocketGuy's website, he writes (in third person, no less) that his goal is "to set the altitude record for a private citizen".

    I don't want to shatter his dream, but Dennis Tito became the first space tourist this past week. He paid $20 million to Russia to loft him into orbit.

    Another civilian who attempted to go into space, Christa McAuliffe, died aboard the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986.

    Finally, death didn't stop Timothy Leary, Gene Roddenberry, and 22 other space enthuasists. Their ashes were launched into space on April 1997 aboard a Pegaus missile.

    Alive or dead, for free or for a fee, civilians have already gone into space.

    Just not from their own backyard. Gotta give him credit for that.

  185. Re:jeez, people... by banda · · Score: 1

    Yes, the original poster may not be aware that Autogyros go up because of their forward movement. But that doesn't make the Wright quote any less valid.

  186. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by banda · · Score: 1
    The "several moments" would be the entire time between the cutoff of thrust (on the way up) and the inflation of the airbag (on the way down).

    It's surprising how many people don't realize that. On the final episode of Junkyard Wars, season 4 (on the cable channel TLC) the two teams built rockets to see who could launch an ostrich egg higher. They both used an accelerometer to trigger their parachute deployment, and both teams, aided by model rocketry experts concluded that when the acceleration drops to zero that the charge should go off because that would happen at the apogee of the flight.

    Wrong! The parachutes were deployed as soon as the rocket motors burned out, preventing the rockets from attaining their highest potential altitude given their upward momentum.

    That demonstrates nicely that (absent significant aerodynamic drag) a rocket is "weightless" from the moment the engines quit until it either hits the ground or is retarded by a parachute.

  187. I'll be watching... by mad_clown · · Score: 2
    I live a couple hours away from Bend... interesting that I haven't heard a WORD of this on local news... Maybe as the time grows closer things will start heating up in terms of press coverage.

    Crazy as it may seem, though, I wish this guy the best of luck. NASA and its international equivalents have held the monopoly on space flight for too long. I'll never be a NASA astronaut, but I'd love to be in space at least once in my life. If this fellow makes it back, and others are heartened by his attempt... it might mean the beginning of a whole new era, where not only military men, scientists, and rich people can experience the majesty of space.

    --
    "Cut word lines. Cut music lines. Smash the control images. Smash the control machine." - William S. Burroughs
  188. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by puck01 · · Score: 1

    He had a masters in engineering...i don't know the area off hand. But, uh, he couldn't light a pilot light. All one has to do, is like, take off a panel and light the flame. Very small learning curve puck

  189. what's with the stereotypes? by puck01 · · Score: 4

    I mean, come on, just because the guy did not complete a college degree doesn't make him an idiot. It seems too many people are down on this guy just because he doesn't have a degree behind his name. Don't get me wrong, I do find the magnitude and risks of this undertaking quite high. That's a no brainer. But who here is to say he won't pull this off. If its because he has no degree, I say think again.

    One thing I keep learning as I get older, there are a lot of idiots with degrees out there, engineers and computer scientists included. I have a neighbor who works for Boeing, has a masters engineering. He supposedly designs the consoles in F15's. This same guy has his pilot light go out a few years ago in his water heater, and had no idea how to relight it! So he came over and ask my step-father, who has no degree, to come over and fix it for him.

    My step-father on the other hand can do about anything he wants. I've seen him build computers, write his own programs, fix cars, build cars from scrap, build an in ground pool of his own design, add on to our garage, repair air conditioners and heaters, wire commercial building, and build a network at his work...he's supposed to be the maintenance guy. Did I mention he only had a high school graduation?

    Of course there are idiots w/o degrees and geniuses with several, but there is no good correlation (ie. degree=intelligent) that I have noticed in my admittedly short time on earth. Just a lot of idiots that think they know something because they have a degree.

    Mr. Walker should be commended for his ambition, its people like this that change the world.

    puck

    1. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by vinlud · · Score: 1

      Of course there are idiots w/o degrees and geniuses with several, but there is no good correlation (ie. degree=intelligent) that I have noticed in my admittedly short time on earth. Just a lot of idiots that think they know something because they have a degree.


      I agree, for these things you need to be inventive and have a lot of courage, and you don't obtain that at college, you're born with it, or not...

      vinlud

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    2. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "Of course there are idiots w/o degrees and geniuses with several, but there is no good correlation (ie. degree=intelligent) that I have noticed in my admittedly short time on earth. Just a lot of idiots that think they know something because they have a degree"

      It's much the same thing with all these "paper" MCSE's out there... All a degree or a certification proves is that you can regurgitate the material that the professors/tests wanted when they wanted it.

      There is only ONE accurate measure of ability: EXPERIENCE.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    3. Re:what's with the stereotypes? by geomcbay · · Score: 4

      Agreed! If Slashdot was around back in the day, there'd be 1000 people flaming the Wright Bros...hah hah, some fucking bike shop owners from north carolina trying to FLY, for god's sake, FLY! Can you imagine? Imagine a beowulf cluster of these imaginary flying machines? Hah hah!! Standard Oil is EVIL DARK EMPIRE!!! We must produce Open Source OIL!!! Louise Brooks naked and petrified!

  190. Point of Information by Zero+Sum · · Score: 2
    UN International law assigns responsibility for all space launches to the national government of the launching facility. If, for example, he took a nuke with him, the U.S.A. would be considered to have broken international law.

    So, whatever government permits a launch from their territory is responsible for any consequences.

    --

    Zero Sum (don't amount to much). [root@localhost]

  191. Wait a second... by agentZ · · Score: 3

    I know Earthstar I isn't the Phoenix, but doesn't this sound like the plot of Star Trek: First Contact ? Amateur guy builds a rocket part. I mean, I assume he's not telling anybody about the warp drive part.

  192. And have you seen it? by Chazmati · · Score: 1

    And have you seen it? Half the stuff looks as well-engineered as a carnival ride. And that pod is awfully small-looking. He better bring a sweater.

  193. Re:jeez, people... by rabtech · · Score: 4

    I can imagine Orville Wright saying the same thing...

    "If I die, I die", he scoffed. "I'd rather die trying this than spend the next 40 years making bicycles, bitter that I never made the attempt."


    -------
    -- russ

    "You want people to think logically? ACK! Turn in your UID, you traitor!"

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  194. H2O2 + Silver Screen by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 1

    Useing an H2O2 as the monofuel and a Silver screen as the catalyst is a bad idea for such a project. I doubt he can get the projected thrust from it for 1 and because it generates massive ammounts of heat if you dont keep the rate down it will actualy melt the silver screen. Useing H2O2 and an alcohol like Ethanol or just about any highly combustable alcohol is best since you then have no limit on thrust, the only limiting factor is how much you can force through the nozzles into the combustion chamber. Im not only a crazy college studen im also the same kinda rocket scientist he is!

    1. Re:H2O2 + Silver Screen by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

      Hey ROCKET SCIENTEST ( ahem ) it is irrellevent if the silver screen melts when the motor is to be used for a short duration ( a few seconds )! Anyway there are many ceramic based catalyst packs that can be used for hours, as his motors are been built by a company with many years of experience in Peroxide motors I am sure they know this. If you knew about rocket motors as you claim too, then you would know what ISP or specific impulse is right?? Anyway if you dont it is the measure of force that each lb of propellant can produce. 90% Peroxide can achieve around 170 lbs-sec in comparison to a bi-propellant systems 210-220 lbs-sec at low pressures. ( around 200-300psi as this is required to keep the propellant tank pressure low, which always needs to be around 50psi higher than the combustion pressure. Higher than this requires heavy high pressure tanks or complexed turbo pump systems to get the propellant to the motor chamber ) However the additonal complexity of adding another liquid and the equiptment to store & deliver it to the motor, far out weight the advantages of the mono-propellant option for this project. It is a much better trade off to simply add more Peroxide to get the same result. Also anybody who has ever built a liquid bi-propellant motor will tell you the complexeties of getting propellants to mix and combust in a stable way far outway the merit a simple catalyst based reaction very attractive. You may know some rocket theory man but often the highest performance is not the best option, a real rocket engineer knows there are various trade offs to made when considering which system is best. The peroxide system ahs proven itself over many years on man rated systems, you argument that it wont make thrust is crap as thrust=ISP x propellant mass flow rate. Its that simple as long as the fuel is delivered correctly the desired thrust will be acheieved. Hey rocket scientist have you ever actually made a rocket????

  195. jeez, people... by Johnny+Starrock · · Score: 5

    Darwin Award, Schmarwin Award. At least he's out there trying instead of sitting around mocking people for expending effort.

    "'If I die, I die,' he scoffs. 'I'd rather die trying this than spend the next 40 years bitter that I never made the attempt.'"

    Godspeed and good luck, Mr. Walker..

    --

    end communication
    1. Re:jeez, people... by DivineOb · · Score: 1
      This sounds to me like the kid who wants a copy of street fighter 2 so badly that he heads home and starts writing his own version in qbasic...

      Yes it's good to try things that are difficult, but some things just aren't meant to be...

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

    2. Re:jeez, people... by DivineOb · · Score: 1
      Right... maybe the attitude expressed in my earlier post wasn't exactly correct. I think it's great to pursue things even if you have little chance of achieving them... There are two key differences between the example I gave and what this guy is doing

      1) No one was arguing 'give this kid a chance, maybe he'll somehow be able to do the work of 20 trained professionals'

      2) There was little threat of you causing harm to yourself or others in trying to write your own copy of SF2

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

  196. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by goodhell · · Score: 1
    He would prefer to survive.

    But if that is not possible, a coffee can spreading his ashes over Yellowstone will do.

  197. Cheaper than the Dennis Tito Express... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    Supposedly Dennis Tito paid US$20 Million to be the first tourist in space.

    If this home-made craft costs only $0.25M then it is in comparison economical. Is this the beginning of some sort of open-source (i.e. 'compile' your own spacecraft) space tourism movement?

  198. Uhoh... Pendulum Guidance! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    What about guidance systems? The thrust will come out at the top of the rocket. An early American pioneer Robert Goddard did the same thing with his early test rockets. The rocket should "hang down" from the thrust like a pendulum. Since he is going straight up in the middle of a large desert there is no need for precise guidance. All he needs is a throttle.

    Wasn't there an article on Slashdot (or a link) on Goddard's birthday showing that pendulum guidance just doesn't work?

    I have a bad feeling about this...

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Uhoh... Pendulum Guidance! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yup, here's the link to the explaination of why it doesn't work:

      http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/pendrock.html

      If he gets off the ground, he's in for a very unfun F-ticket ride!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  199. Re:London Bridge by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    There's unlikely to be a ball of flame with hydrogen peroxide fuel -- although 90% peroxide can be touchy stuff. (All those oxygen molecules held in bondage, yearning to be free.) He could be savagely bleached!

    And a fall from 32 miles won't generate much reentry heat.

    Flipping over is quite possible since his pendulum guidance isn't stable.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  200. Re:This isn't news! by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

    If your refering to the rocket car Darwin award, here's the true story.

  201. slow down by sonofepson · · Score: 1
    I've got to believe he will end up doing it in Mexico.
    The odds can't be good that the FAA will OK a manned flight of an untested amateur rocket.

    The sane thing to do would be to spend another half million to build and launch a couple of test shots. He would have a hell of a lot better chance of convincing the FAA that all was golden after a couple succesful unmanned test flights, and a chance to discover the inevitable design flaws in his complex machine in a less permanant way!

    Still, all and all, I have to think it is a good thing that there seems to be a growing civilian intrest in/push for space flight.

    --
    If Godzilla did not exist, man would have had to create him.
    1. Re:slow down by Tech187 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's a group of enforcers already scheduled to roll in with APCs and dismantle his setup when it's not approved by the bureaucrats.

  202. Re:Aerodynamics... by reezle · · Score: 1

    The tank is large, the drag is great... The Capsule looks rather sleek. (from photots) I assume the two would seperate rather quickly.

  203. Several moments of weightlessness... Worth it? by Bonker · · Score: 5

    Momentum will carry Walker and his capsule up to 32 miles, where he will experience several moments of weightlessness and then begin to fall back toward Earth.

    Reporter: Since you've miraculously survived your voyage in Earthstar 1, we'd like to ask a few questions. Looking back on your project, what would you have done differently and what will you do differently when and if you try again.

    Walker: (In a body cast) I think I'm going to spend a less time concentrating on those few moments of weightlessness and a little more time packing some reentry parachutes.


    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  204. should we give him the award now or later? by CheechBG · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I think this is a testament to how far rich yuppie egos will go. Yes, the guy is 42, not the normal twentysomethings that the dot-comers in that repo article a few days ago are, but his thought process level is just the same, IMO. This is a guy who, just because he "made his own fortune", or is a "self-made man", he suddenly thinks he knows more than all the combined PhD's that GRADUATED COLLEGE at NASA, arguably one of the largest collection of scientific minds ever put together. Screw them, I suppose, all this guy has to do is pick up Rocketry for Dummies and blow a few million the he just has lying around and fly up into space. I say give him the Darwin Award now, an make him fork over his fortune to NASA, God knows the US government isn't. Maybe he can have his name on the module of the ISS where they keep the bathrooms :)

    1. Re:should we give him the award now or later? by Ashleigh · · Score: 1
      Read it this way:

      The combined "Doctors of Philosophy" who have graduated college (okay, well thats superfluous, but anyway) and now work at nasa.

      --
      Why yes, all my base are belong to you.
      How did you guess?
    2. Re:should we give him the award now or later? by thinkit · · Score: 1

      a phd is just some words on paper. it is only relevant to a society that recognizes them. the laws of physics and mathematics will apply to anybody, regardless of their diploma.

      --
      --how long till the operators are jailed for anime-induced pedophelia and /. dies?
  205. Re:this tripe gets a "5" !?!? by rasper99 · · Score: 1
    I hate to get juvenile and flick some crap back but it seems to be needed here.

    Since I originally wrote what was cut and pasted makes it a little different. It was late on Sunday night and I wanted people to have some facts so why re-invent the wheel?

    I didn't put the link in because it was mentioned several times before.

    I do have a link for el_guapo to help him believe about who is webmaster for the site.

    http://www.rocketguy.com/el_guapo.html

  206. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by rasper99 · · Score: 1

    Tito didn't build his own rocket. As Rocket Guy says "Everyone else has gone up in a rocket made by the US or Russia".

  207. Re:Rocket Guy is for real by rasper99 · · Score: 1

    The link was mentioned several times before I posted. I was putting a snippet from the site out to get people interested.

  208. Rocket Guy is for real by rasper99 · · Score: 5
    This guy is for real. As a close friend of Rocket Guy and webmaster of his site I can tell you he does plan to do this flight. He would prefer to survive.

    Before you judge get a few of the facts straight.

    He is NOT going into space. Space starts at 58 miles up. The goal is to go straight up 30 miles. There are no plans for orbit just to set the altitude record for a private citizen. Orbit requires going at least 170 miles up and going 17,000 MPH around the earth. Lots of up and lots of sideways. Going up to a straight up to a stop and dropping back down is different.

    The rocket will be fueled by 90 percent pure hydrogen peroxide. It reacts with a silver catalyst screen to produce thrust. This is the same thing the Bell jet belt used. Footage of the Bell jet belt was used in the TV series "Lost in Space" the TV series. This fuel only has about 1/3 the energy of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. That's why it usually isn't used for a rocket. Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen are also very dangerous to deal with.

    What about re-entry? Since he is going up and not sideways re-entry isn't as much of a problem as going 17,000 MPH and hitting the atmosphere at an angle. It's up, up, up to basically a stall and falling back down with parachutes to slow you down. He is going to have an option to eject and use a conventional backpack parachute.

  209. I'm Worried About Sabotage (Paranoid) by Databass · · Score: 2

    "I mean, look at all the failures that have happened in both the American and Russian space programs."
    If there is such a thing as a sinister government agency that doesn't want to be shown up by single civilian, couldn't they easily trash this operation? There must be quite a few ways to make a rocket blow up that looks accidental. (Lasers were the first long range, hard-to-detect idea that came to mind.)

    If anything goes wrong, the common public is going to assume that it's because it was a dumbass idea for civilians to go into space. They'll leave it to massively funded government projects. No one is going to look for tiny laser burns on the peroxide tanks.

    "Getting into space is a little more complex than strapping a whole lot of explosives to something, and praying :)" This is exactly the meme hypothetical sinister government agencies would want to perpetuate, and one that would be locked in if this little operation is destroyed by sabotage.

    There's a chance it could fail on its own, but if it were sabotage how would anyone tell the difference? A comprehensive, accurate wreckage investigation would have to be conducted by neutral sources.

    We'll see. I hope it works perfectly.

  210. Well, he is a millionaire.... by zerofoo · · Score: 3

    He must not be that big an idiot, he's a millionaire and i'm not. Lots of people do really risky things (like climbing Everest or K-2) but I can't figure out why. I hope this guy did his math right...pure hydrogen peroxide and silver produces quite a punch, if it works it will be a wild ride. -ted

  211. Did This Guy Conduct a Test Flight Yet? by MOBE2001 · · Score: 1

    Or is this one going to be the maiden flight?

  212. This wouldnt have to do with the X prize would it? by The0retical · · Score: 1

    i have reciently seen an ad that the first person to go into space with a home made rocket will win a 1,000,000 dollar prize and a really neat looking trophy plus a lot of bragging rights. NASA has put up this contest for all of you wanna be rocketteers out there. Hell i'd be there if i had the engineering know how to design something like that.

  213. You moron. by doubtme · · Score: 3

    You moron.

    Lets see.
    Bill Gates are Larry Ellison perhaps the two most famous uni drop outs. Obviously their life works deserve to be mocked.

    He's a multi-millionare due to the numerous childrens toy's he's invented through his own creativity and entrepreneurship. Naturally, that is an "achievement" worthy of mockery.

    He's now spent two years of his life attempting to do something only government agencies have previously suceeded at.

    If he fails, so what? At least he's acted on his dreams, and not spent his life cutting down tall poppies.

    F**k the armchair generals.
    Doubtme

    --

    There's no $$$ in 'team'...
    www..--..net - for incisive, w
  214. The science of naming things by screwballicus · · Score: 4
    He's going to exit the atmosphere in a capsule named "Earthsar 1", eh? This is a fabulous venture, but if he's going to risk his life and spend his livelyhood on an attempt like this, he might have taken more care in picking a name for his vehicle that isn't already taken by a fungus. You'll notice that NASA carefully employed the tactic of not naming its own vehicles after parasitic organisms. The Mildew VII and Mold X never made it to the Cape Canaveral launch pad, I'm afraid.

    Russia was similarly successful in avoiding fungal monikers. Sputnik, however, might be considered only a minor success, mind you, as it makes the mistake of being most easily likened to a sound you make when you sneeze.

  215. Quick question by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    What the heck is "To the moon, Alice" from? I've heard that phrase a million times, but I'll be damned if I know its origin. Someone like to fill me in? (I went through this once before with "All your base...")

  216. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide fuel by Hassman · · Score: 1
    Don't count Hydrogen Peroxide out. The Germans were going to power their U-boats with it because it would allow the subs to achiece speeds of 25+ knots submerged. Givin the time period of design that is VERY impressive considering the alternate methods could only give you about 12-15 knots. Therefore given ~60 years of development i'd say he may be able to do it...though I think we'll all see him as the winner of the Darwin awards...

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  217. heres the capsule by thanq · · Score: 1

    http://www.rocketguy.com/rocket/testcap1.html

    here's the dude's capsule. *chuckle* *snort* *laugh*

  218. Is this the same guy... by w2gy · · Score: 1

    ... as the guy from Oldham, who has managed to get two other indivduals to stump up 250,000 GBP each (a married couple IIRC), and who is planning on taking them out up past the 58 mile boundary within a few months?

    In the North Manchester (UK) area, there seem to be quite a few of these little projects knocking around.

    --
    This line intentionally left here to annoy you.
  219. not quite space by ComaVN · · Score: 1

    Flying 32 miles high is not quite getting into space. That's about the altitude of the ozone layer IIRC.

    Too bad for the guy, he's going to kill himself trying to not reach space. Why not just go for the extra 150 miles or so, and pass some satelites? Or crash into them, that would be a cool way to die.


    -------------------------------------
    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  220. No, not Darwin by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    Darwin awards are for those people who kill themselves for no good reason (other than raising the IQ of the gene pool). Like people who rock a Coke machine to get a free soda and get crushed to death, or people who sit in front of microwave power transmitters to get warm. I could see how getting into space is a fair trade for one's life.

  221. Re: NASA flight plans by pavonis · · Score: 1
    Incidentall, did Nasa have to file flight plans during the shuttle launches? They'd be interesting to see.

    They certainly do file flight plans for the period the shuttle is in the lower atmosphere. They get very big no-fly zones for it, too; I forget the exact number, but they really clear all planes from the area.

  222. typedef char degree[3] by thinkit · · Score: 1

    and that's all the degree is...3 letters. good to see someone working outside the system.

    --
    --how long till the operators are jailed for anime-induced pedophelia and /. dies?
  223. He may be OK by semenzato · · Score: 1

    Without understanding the technical issues, I am giving this guy the benefit of the doubt. He is only going up to 30 miles (the Shuttle can reach 400 miles) and will be weightless for a fairly short time. Reentry is probably a relatively small deal. The price tag seems quite low (a small Cessna costs that much) but then again this isn't exactly space exploration, it's more like manned amateur rocketry.

  224. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide fuel by Mantis69 · · Score: 1

    The Germans also used hydrogen peroxide(H202) as part of the propulsion for the Me163 rocket plane. The fuel was H202 and Hydrazine, pretty toxic all round, but the performance was very good. Unfortunately one of the side affects of the H202 was that when it leaked into the cockpit it dissolved the pilot! Probably handling 90% h202 is as risky as the flight itself.

    Personally, I hope the guy succeeds.

    --
    Mr Churchill, If I was your wife I would put poison in your tea! Madam, If I was your Husband I would drink it!
  225. lose-lose situation by ProbeAD · · Score: 1

    I don't know what is worse......if he dies while trying this, or the hoards of "backyard rocket scientist" that will blindly attempt to duplicate this if he is successful.

  226. London Bridge by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 1

    Given the level of detail in the article, it's actually difficult to make a prediction one way or the other about this particular suggestion -- that the tank and the capsule will hit each other.

    The explosives (?) that would be used to detach the tank from the capsule would introduce a difference of both velocity and trajectory between the two objects, which will grow exponentially as the flight proceeds. For example, if you can fashion a charge that will project the tank away from the capsule, you might have a shot at surviving.

    That is, of course, assuming you're not consumed in fire prior to liftoff, that your rocket stays stable in its trajectory once you've launched (and doesn't flip over and start heading downward with 12,000 pounds of thrust or explode Challenger-like in a cool ball of flame with little streaming bits of hot metal falling back to the ground), that you aren't crushed by the g-force going up, that you don't suffocate as your capsule decompresses and/or you run out of oxygen in your tank, that your vehicle isn't burned to a Mir crisp on re-entry, that your deceleration chute deploys properly, and that it's big enough to slow you enough so that you're not simply 5,000 pouds of falling steel heading for a rather rude and sudden stop down near the ground.

    Interesting story. I ain't climbing on.

    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
  227. This guy should praised by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

    You doubters are all a shame to the title NERDS.. Brian Walker is undertaking one of the most incredible and amazing flights since the Wright brothers. Its shame that you have all been fooled by the corrupt dealings of Governments with endless budgets to spend, pouring there money into massive corporations too glad to spend it. That is why rockets cost so much, if you where at all educated about the history of the modern rockets you would all know that they where developed from ICBMs. They where first designed in the 50s-60s using what was then state of the art materials and technologies, with no concern placed on cost. These technologies are now beyond redundant but still in use because the companies who produce them have there own senators in congress who make sure they always secure the next Government contract. It is for this reason no new companies can enter the market with simpler and more cost effective technologies, ( see the demise of Beal Aerospace the American Rocket Company etc ). Rockets are not some mystical high technology device, they are in fact simpler than an internal combustion engine. And have been designed, tested & refined for the last 50+ years, the problem is that we are still using 30 + year old technology because of the above stated political and financial pressures. Imagine if computers followed this suit we would still be using the 286?? I have been involved in several entrepreneurial rocket ventures, and the design of several rocket systems of various sizes. As well as having over 16 years first hand experience in experimental rocketry, and I can see that Brian's plan is quite solid. And the main reason is because it is simple, a ballistic flight to 30 kilometres in an unguided rocket vehicle. He is using the same type of propulsion that has been proven for many years to power drag cars, as well as established methods of composite airframe manufacturing for the vehicle. I draw your attention to the case of the Voyager aircraft that made history by flying the globe, it was built not by a large corporation but by one man Burt Rutan. He designed, tested and built it for under $7million. GE Aerospace cost model for the same project $700 million, did the voyager fall out of the sky because GE didn't build it for $700 million??? The lack of education in many of the replies here is obvious example " what about support infrastructure, and orbital calculations". First of all his not going into orbit it is a ballistic sub-orbital flight, effectively the same as flying a plane near vertical for a few minutes, in terms of infrastructure his design requires little as it is transported to launch site on a mobile launcher. Once again well proven and sound technology, also with today's computer power a couple of Pentium class computers would be all that is need to test and monitor vehicles systems. As he his vehicle is unguided it removes the need for expensive internal guidance navigation and control systems, which are behind most new launch vehicle failures ( see Ariane 5 first launch ). In fact when we strip it down to basic Brian Walker is launching himself in BIG MODEL ROCKET, and that is why he has as good a chance as anybody launching home made rocket at success. Some real imaginative guy quotes " I hear his got millions, why dosent he just pay the Russians", thats not his goal his goal is to do it by his own hands. Sure and why dont we just let Microsoft write all the worlds software, lets not be pioneers & find better or cheaper ways to things. Meanwhile the rich can go to space for the next 100years becasue nobody else is trying to make affordable space technology. It will be by the efforts of people such as Brian that you and I will get the opportunity to make this voyage, not by government or big business as they have already had 50 years to get us there and they are still no closer. Think about that next time before you so openly bag a pioneer.

  228. Re:This wouldnt have to do with the X prize would by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

    Your info is wrong check out www.xprize.org It has nothing to do with NASA first of all. Its 10 million dollars second of all. And thirdly it requires a rocket launch of 3 adults to 100km, with the ability to refurbish and relaunch the rocket within 3 days.

  229. Re:oregon? by rocketnerd · · Score: 1

    Dude do you even know what you are talking about? He is not going into space, he is not trying to reach orbit. It is a ballistic sub-orbital flight, straight up & down...Just like pointing a gun & firing it into the sky, do you think that bullet goes into orbit? Not likley as an object requires over 7500 KM/hr to stay in orbit around the earth. He is not even leaving the atmosphere, take a look at an Encyclopedia and understand the various regions of earths atmosphere. He is not even leaving the stratosphere. Every day some where on this clobe someone is flying a home made rocket on such a flight, also people are building fiberglass kit aircraft in there back yard. Also people have been driving drag cars, bikes and even rocket packs using Peroxide. Also parachutes are used safely everyday to drop everything from people to millitary tanks.. SO there for we have a man building a fiberglass rocket airshell ( proven tech )powered by Hydrogen Peroxide ( Proven Tech ) & recovered by parachute ( Proven Tech ), why is this such a problem for you to grasp? Also it might help you to learn the difference between sub-orbital and orbital flight, maybe then the idea of what this guy is doing wont seem so impossible to you any more. It obviously challanges your small frame of realities so much, that you are wasting all this time & effort trying to prove why it cant be done. The excellent theory you put together out of snippets of info you found in a Encyclopedia or on the web re: space launching is great except for one thing.. How do you explain space launches from Vandenberg AFB..Isnt that in in California?? No wonder your anonymous