It is not the common people "not american" syndrome, but the big companies and politician's "big brother" syndrome. We, the people, don't have any problems with who we are, what we like, and what to do in our free time. As of the government, bought, and sold by our "big brothers".......i could say only one thing %$#^$%#^%$#$.
They already said: The drone was not "forced" to land, but was asked politely "...dear drone, would you care to join us for a brief photo session?", and the drone, as you know it, could not resist the urge to be seen in the latest playboy... i mean playdrone magazine.
You know, americans are only 300 millions. The whole population is about 7 billions. Do you think that only USA citizens did it? And even if you are able to, could you imprison 7 billion?
I would agree with you, if it was not leaked that Google is actually implementing SOPA for China, translated they are ready to do it for USA too, or maybe they are already doing it, without bother to inform you.
But the fact is that these groups would benefit mostly from the SOPA bill. So how is that these companies are doing what, punishing themselves? Where is the logic?
Statistic. If you pay 10% less to your employees, and if only less than 100% of your employees complain, and require to be paid more (100%), you are saving money. Clever, ain't?
I hate to say it, but there is one bright example of why we HAVE to have such a "poaching" for the good of the innovation. Windows NT? Anyone? Do you know the history? If Microsoft had such an agreement, Windows NT would never ever happen, and for bad or good, WinNT was pretty good step forward for everyone.
And also, if you leave the company, you are not allowed to do anything which is in direct or indirect competition with their main business. Translated, you are not even allowed to breath.
OR, these two companies: A and B, would sue the shit out of company C, resulting of the happy bipolar A and B market, without any stupid bastard, trying to "stop the innovation".
OR, they could have a "no pouch" agreement with the before mentioned company (Apple), and actually even decrease the salary of this "top gun" engineer...
Not regulate, Deregulate. These contracts were already "regulated" by the "DO NOT DO EVIL" companies. And the purpose of the government is to Deregulate them.
Actually, this case is the main reason for the anti-trust law. To keep the free market free, and to prevent the big companies to monopolize (socialize) the free market.
Did the constitution said anything about the "right" to be a doctor? And in a matter of fact, yes, there should be any license. Let the FREE MARKET decide who deserves to be a doctor (by having or not having patients), and who does not. At the end of the day, this is the basement of the capitalism, THE FREE MARKET. Free as a freedom, not free as a bear.
Slashdot Mirror
It is not the common people "not american" syndrome, but the big companies and politician's "big brother" syndrome. We, the people, don't have any problems with who we are, what we like, and what to do in our free time. As of the government, bought, and sold by our "big brothers".......i could say only one thing %$#^$%#^%$#$.
Canadian what?
When you said "hard pressed", did you mean it "literally"?
Man, boy, alien? Read my lips: Are you stupid or what?
They already said: The drone was not "forced" to land, but was asked politely "...dear drone, would you care to join us for a brief photo session?", and the drone, as you know it, could not resist the urge to be seen in the latest playboy... i mean playdrone magazine.
Then why do you keep saying it? Are you stupid or what?
But there is, and i already said it. You are stupid and idiot.
Actually, i am not believer, but for you i will make an exception, even if i have to personally put you there.....
Your comment is stupid, and racist. You will burn in hell.
You know, americans are only 300 millions. The whole population is about 7 billions. Do you think that only USA citizens did it? And even if you are able to, could you imprison 7 billion?
Why stop here? What about poly-marriage? I mean many men/women with many men/women? WHY NOT????
I would agree with you, if it was not leaked that Google is actually implementing SOPA for China, translated they are ready to do it for USA too, or maybe they are already doing it, without bother to inform you.
But the fact is that these groups would benefit mostly from the SOPA bill. So how is that these companies are doing what, punishing themselves? Where is the logic?
Statistic. If you pay 10% less to your employees, and if only less than 100% of your employees complain, and require to be paid more (100%), you are saving money. Clever, ain't?
Except this little ruling saying that it is not illegal to include "no class-action" clause in your contract.
Like what, a private company (the government) having a total monopoly?
I hate to say it, but there is one bright example of why we HAVE to have such a "poaching" for the good of the innovation. Windows NT? Anyone? Do you know the history? If Microsoft had such an agreement, Windows NT would never ever happen, and for bad or good, WinNT was pretty good step forward for everyone.
And also, if you leave the company, you are not allowed to do anything which is in direct or indirect competition with their main business. Translated, you are not even allowed to breath.
Monsanto, check their history........
OR, these two companies: A and B, would sue the shit out of company C, resulting of the happy bipolar A and B market, without any stupid bastard, trying to "stop the innovation".
OR, they could have a "no pouch" agreement with the before mentioned company (Apple), and actually even decrease the salary of this "top gun" engineer...
IP: get rid of it
......
Copyright: gone
Patents: burn them
If we are gonna to stop all the regulations, why dont we stop ALL the regulations????
Not regulate, Deregulate. These contracts were already "regulated" by the "DO NOT DO EVIL" companies. And the purpose of the government is to Deregulate them.
Actually, this case is the main reason for the anti-trust law. To keep the free market free, and to prevent the big companies to monopolize (socialize) the free market.
Did the constitution said anything about the "right" to be a doctor? And in a matter of fact, yes, there should be any license. Let the FREE MARKET decide who deserves to be a doctor (by having or not having patients), and who does not. At the end of the day, this is the basement of the capitalism, THE FREE MARKET. Free as a freedom, not free as a bear.