Nope, here is the title: "What Does Sunset On an Alien World Look Like?"
Where did you read anything about "what would we see on a sunset on an alien world?"
I realize that as a geek (whatever that means) i tend to read the question to the letter, as any normal computer would do, hence my confusion.....
Only if these aliens use the same light spectrum as we do, and use the same photo standard as we do.....and if and only if they actually SEE with the same organs as we do.
Actually, with the new NDAA bill, the government has the monopoly on the use of force......Do you consider it a good thing?
Linus Torvald does have monopoly on the name linux......i have monopoly on my name.....but there are hundreds of thousands of people with the same name, but so what? do i really have monopoly???
The IETF's monopoly over Internet standards.......sorry man, did you just said that all the human beings on earth have monopoly on everything on earth!!!! Please, be more specific.
Name me even 1 feature that Google introduced to comply with standards.These guys even messed with the well accepted TCP/IP packet size just to make their main page to load faster, screwing all the rest of the world. What the........
Actually, in the common sense or morally, file sharing is MORAL. We share everything, we share air, food, language, knowledge, laws, expeience, etc.... EVERYTHING. And what is funny is if you go to elementary schools you will see this: SHARING IS CARING, so are we teaching our kids something IMMORAL? Nevertheless, instead of calling your common sense, there is actually pretty well documented and tried argument of why sharing is good, and why the copyright was introduced into society in the first place. Translated, just for once try to read some history, and stop "sharing" your half-baked immoral ideas.
I think that barbarian is our word, you, guys, you use another word, which for some strange reason is very close to the turkish word for anyone who is not "turkish". Funny, ain't?
Man, i see you know a lot, but do you actually know that the israel tribe conquered the jewish tribe, by force, and founded the Israel? So who is the aggressor i ask?
I was hit by some idiots two times, while waiting at the red light, 0% my fault, and do you know what? Now my car is "repaired", but if i am to sell now, these "not my fault" accidents would cost me at lest 2-3k. Is my car insured? Yes. Is the insurance company going to compensate me? NO. So, whose fault is that i am paying my insurance, i drive responsibly, i did not cause the accident, but.....at the end i am the sucker!!!!
Oh, and btw, this kind of reasoning like "if you are good guy, you should not be afraid of being rapped by TSA" was tried many times, and found stupid (i am restraining myself of using some more appropriate words).
Even citing the "solar eclipse" is more meaningful reason for not being paid than some black box. The black box itself is not the reason, but the information inside. If they don't know what actually happened, they have to prove with some other means what actually happened. And then and only then they could point out the missing black box as an additional reason, but as a primary reason.
I will loose what? That the black box is missing? So, if i was hit by someone for example, while driving with 120mph (over speed limit), then we are both guilty, no matter that the other guy hit me. But if there is no other way to prove that speed, except having the black box, then HOW they are actually going to prove my over-speeding!!!! Simply because the black box is missing, does not give you the right to "imagine" that the actual speed was what, 120mph? 200mph?350mph?
Here the maximum reward is $25k. Anyway, even if it is only $!, the main point is actually to win the claim, not the win some big amount. After that, the fact is that you are innocent, and they are guilty....
Nope, the insurance policy is pretty straightforward (except when it is not of course), but, if the only reason to avoid paying is the missing/broken black box, then it is the insurance company that has to prove it my wrongdoings. And you are again miss-leaded. As a defendant i have the right to not testify, in which case i would not have the benefit of explaining my point, but i would have the benefit of NOT saying something that i dont want to say.
You are missing the point. I DON'T have to say anything, or prove anything, It is my right to be silent and to not incriminate myself. It is their duty to prove me wrong. If they refuse to pay without reason/facts, then i will sue them. End of story.
So, the first thing you should do after a car accident is to find and destroy its black box, so your insurance company would have no way to avoid paying the, what, insurance?
You mean that there exists some good developer who instead of actually, what, developing, likes to watch how the others are, what, developing!!!!! Man, you remind of this movie "Enemy at the gates", they also had this "pair" developing (in group of 5 people).........
So you want to gather some intelligence of your employee, which even you admit is not relevant to their daily activities? What's next, asking them about their favorite sex position? Oh, never mind, forget that last one.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean when the war is imminent, they would show good will and release him? On what ground?
Nope, here is the title: "What Does Sunset On an Alien World Look Like?"
Where did you read anything about "what would we see on a sunset on an alien world?"
I realize that as a geek (whatever that means) i tend to read the question to the letter, as any normal computer would do, hence my confusion.....
Only if these aliens use the same light spectrum as we do, and use the same photo standard as we do.....and if and only if they actually SEE with the same organs as we do.
Actually, with the new NDAA bill, the government has the monopoly on the use of force......Do you consider it a good thing?
Linus Torvald does have monopoly on the name linux......i have monopoly on my name.....but there are hundreds of thousands of people with the same name, but so what? do i really have monopoly???
The IETF's monopoly over Internet standards.......sorry man, did you just said that all the human beings on earth have monopoly on everything on earth!!!! Please, be more specific.
He does not have to. The monopoly is by definition evil. Please, name me even one "good" monopoly, and i will beg for mercy.
Name me even 1 feature that Google introduced to comply with standards.These guys even messed with the well accepted TCP/IP packet size just to make their main page to load faster, screwing all the rest of the world. What the........
Actually, in the common sense or morally, file sharing is MORAL. We share everything, we share air, food, language, knowledge, laws, expeience, etc.... EVERYTHING. And what is funny is if you go to elementary schools you will see this: SHARING IS CARING, so are we teaching our kids something IMMORAL? Nevertheless, instead of calling your common sense, there is actually pretty well documented and tried argument of why sharing is good, and why the copyright was introduced into society in the first place. Translated, just for once try to read some history, and stop "sharing" your half-baked immoral ideas.
WHy malware? Even the firmware is doing it right now.
You are wrong, it has already started. In a few years actually, there will be a lot of changes...to worst of course.
20 millions russians. That's how many (at least) were killed...
I think that barbarian is our word, you, guys, you use another word, which for some strange reason is very close to the turkish word for anyone who is not "turkish". Funny, ain't?
Man, i see you know a lot, but do you actually know that the israel tribe conquered the jewish tribe, by force, and founded the Israel? So who is the aggressor i ask?
I was hit by some idiots two times, while waiting at the red light, 0% my fault, and do you know what? Now my car is "repaired", but if i am to sell now, these "not my fault" accidents would cost me at lest 2-3k. Is my car insured? Yes. Is the insurance company going to compensate me? NO. So, whose fault is that i am paying my insurance, i drive responsibly, i did not cause the accident, but.....at the end i am the sucker!!!!
Oh, and btw, this kind of reasoning like "if you are good guy, you should not be afraid of being rapped by TSA" was tried many times, and found stupid (i am restraining myself of using some more appropriate words).
Even citing the "solar eclipse" is more meaningful reason for not being paid than some black box. The black box itself is not the reason, but the information inside. If they don't know what actually happened, they have to prove with some other means what actually happened. And then and only then they could point out the missing black box as an additional reason, but as a primary reason.
I will loose what? That the black box is missing? So, if i was hit by someone for example, while driving with 120mph (over speed limit), then we are both guilty, no matter that the other guy hit me. But if there is no other way to prove that speed, except having the black box, then HOW they are actually going to prove my over-speeding!!!! Simply because the black box is missing, does not give you the right to "imagine" that the actual speed was what, 120mph? 200mph?350mph?
Here the maximum reward is $25k. Anyway, even if it is only $!, the main point is actually to win the claim, not the win some big amount. After that, the fact is that you are innocent, and they are guilty....
But i am not going to sue them for the missing black box, but for fraud and refusal to pay without any reason.
Nope, the insurance policy is pretty straightforward (except when it is not of course), but, if the only reason to avoid paying is the missing/broken black box, then it is the insurance company that has to prove it my wrongdoings. And you are again miss-leaded. As a defendant i have the right to not testify, in which case i would not have the benefit of explaining my point, but i would have the benefit of NOT saying something that i dont want to say.
And they have to actually prove it.....
And there is actually one very good way to kill their biggest advantage. It is called small claims court.
Shit happens, right? So you are not going to honor this contract? Fine, will meet you in the court room.
You are missing the point. I DON'T have to say anything, or prove anything, It is my right to be silent and to not incriminate myself. It is their duty to prove me wrong. If they refuse to pay without reason/facts, then i will sue them. End of story.
So, the first thing you should do after a car accident is to find and destroy its black box, so your insurance company would have no way to avoid paying the, what, insurance?
You mean that there exists some good developer who instead of actually, what, developing, likes to watch how the others are, what, developing!!!!! Man, you remind of this movie "Enemy at the gates", they also had this "pair" developing (in group of 5 people).........
So you want to gather some intelligence of your employee, which even you admit is not relevant to their daily activities? What's next, asking them about their favorite sex position? Oh, never mind, forget that last one.