Slashdot Mirror


User: stanlyb

stanlyb's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,498
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,498

  1. Re:wtf on Supreme Court Decides Your Silence May Be Used Against You · · Score: 1

    The most importing thing of requiring attorney is not the he is good or bad in his job, but that you effectively put pretty big firewall between you, and the prosecution. Which is always the best approach. You don't wanna to talk to the police, not, ever. And after this ruling, the first thing i will say if any cops asks me a question is:
    1. Are you a cop? ....YES
    2.Am i free to go?......
    If not, then i will require an attorney, or my lawyer, if i am rich enough to have one.
    So, just for the quiz, if a cop wanna to buy a coffee for example from my coffee-shop, what should i do..................

  2. Re:wtf on Supreme Court Decides Your Silence May Be Used Against You · · Score: 2

    Nope, the moral of the story is to NEVER go to the police in the first place. WTF? Who, in his mind, would willingly go into the wolf's den! To confess innocence? Don't make me laugh.

  3. Genereata!!! on Don't Panic, But We've Passed Peak Apple (and Google, and Facebook) · · Score: 1

    If by "Generate" you mean "BUY", then i agree with you.
    BUT, if by "Generate" you mean "INVENT", then i disagree with you.

  4. GitBlt on Ask Slashdot: Self-Hosting Git Repositories? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty good web interface. But in general, you dont need any special repository server, as GIT itself is the server, and client, etc. The only difference between dedicated server and a simple shared folder is the authentication, and the questionable convenience of having a web interface.

  5. Re:If you go to hospital on Supreme Court: No Patents For Natural DNA Sequences · · Score: 1

    You mean, i cannot give my blood for free? or my lilver? or my kidney? or my heart? or my brain? And after a very long thinking process (2seconds), even the thinking process is owned by the patent holder???

  6. Re:A thought experiment on Supreme Court: No Patents For Natural DNA Sequences · · Score: 1

    They will sue the "Nature", and rape her...

  7. Re:If you go to hospital on Supreme Court: No Patents For Natural DNA Sequences · · Score: 0

    Yes idiot, they do, it is well proven fact.

  8. Re:The market works on expectations on Supreme Court: No Patents For Natural DNA Sequences · · Score: 1

    They asked for $100, they got $50, and they expected to have $1...So, win-win.

  9. If you go to hospital on Supreme Court: No Patents For Natural DNA Sequences · · Score: 0

    And give you a cure, that "modifies" your DNA, then do they own you???
    You don't know? But, but it is well known fact that everything changes your DNA, even the food that you eat, could cause a change.....oh, nevermind, soon, the "Unincorporated man" will become a reality, and then we will have to move to "Unincorporated war"...

  10. Re:No shit on Another Study Confirms Hands-Free Texting While Driving Is Unsafe · · Score: 1

    You have a good point. Lets ban 99% of the people...

  11. Re:Impeachment on NSA WhistleBlower Outs Himself · · Score: 1

    5th amendment. With PRISM, the 5th amendment becomes obsolete.

  12. back door? on Inside PRISM: Why the Government Hates Encryption · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about the front door? Did anyone denied access to the front door? What about any door? What about the room? Did anyone, explicitly denied any kind of access?

  13. SUPER-HYPER-FAIL on Seeking Fifth Amendment Defenders · · Score: 1

    Man, you are sooo messed up...
    Why the heck do you expect than anyone here will ANSWER you, and not only this, but will answer you the way YOU want him/her to answer you? What's wrong with you? Are you a teacher? A policeman? Or just an idiot?

  14. Straight answer: YES or NO on Seeking Fifth Amendment Defenders · · Score: 1


    ................
    Take first the "right" to refuse to answer. Now, I agree that if the government asks you, say, "What books are you reading these days?", the correct answer is "None of your damn business." Nobody else has the right to know what's on your reading list. However, if a murder is committed, pretty much everyone agrees that it is the state's legitimate business (that is, everyone's business) whether you committed the murder or not. What's the philosophical argument that you shouldn't have to answer "Yes" or "No" if the police ask if you committed the murder?
    ...............
    Man, you are really messed up. I will give you pretty straightforward answer:
    I would agree to answer any question, even as you mentioned before, but only and only if do ACCEPT my answer for what it is. If i say YES, and you could prove that i don't lie, then YES, i am guilty, end of story.
    BUT, and here comes the important part, if i say NO, and you cannot prove that i do lie, then you MUST LET ME GO. End of story. No more questions.
    Do you see the problem now??? The police DOES NOT want to prove whether you are guilty or innocent, their only task is to prove you GUILTY. No matter what, no matter how.
    You still don't see the problem? I give up then...

  15. First, read your history... on Seeking Fifth Amendment Defenders · · Score: 0

    The fifth amendment is nothing more but an explicitly stating what US constitution already say. If you wonder what i am talking about, read your history, and more precisely the history of your "constitution", which starts around 12th century, with the acceptance of "Magna Carta", and why these guys decided that it is so important to include all of these statures. As a side note, do you happen to know that at this time everybody has the "right" to bear arms, in their case bows, which now you would consider as a sniper-gun, and which is forbidden to have, no matter that the "right" is right, if you understand what i mean....
    And another side note, it was explicitly stated in Magna Carta that the "police" DOES NOT have the right to stop you, without reason, in order to avoid the "harassment" from them......Amazing, ain't so? 800 years ago people recognized the power of the police, and why it is important to limit it, but now no one is questioning the "right" of NSA, FSA, (and the last to close the door) of harassing you on such a broad level that just leaves me speechless...

  16. Re:land of the free... on US Mining Data Directly From 9 Silicon Valley Companies · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  17. Re:A nice lead... on CRTC Unveils New Wireless Code To Protect Canadian Customers · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    90% hidden job market
    100% networking - Do you think the fall of RIM and Nortel is a coincidence???
    Racism - Oh, not open, not so obvious, but it is there, hidden in their "communities"...
    Health Care? Really? Man, even Zimbabwe's health care is better and less expensive. Unless you happen to have a nice government job, paid with tax money, and covering EVERYTHING (something impossible to have in any private company), once you have anything more serious than flu, you will see the differences.
    Public services? Again, don't make me laugh, do you know the only one big city in North America that DOES NOT have train/subway connection between its main airport and the downtown? (let me help you, Toronto)
    Garbage collectors.....Do you know of any other country of the world where you need to be at least a senator or relative in order to land a garbage collector job!!!
    Taxes......with one single stroke Canada manage to increase the inflation with 5%, by charging all the goods from 8 to 13%. Amazing. I just wonder why the interest did not jump with 5% too....
    Taxes....again.....if you happen to earn more than 70k the big axe will cut at least two legs or arms. In US it is about 250k. Wow, amazing, ain't so?

  18. Re:What if the person is innocent? on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    It is really sad story, but now i see why i would never, never, ever, marry an american woman. Just like in the song...

  19. Re:What if the person is innocent? on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    or (c), forget about the whole story, and let your kid to live without you..

  20. Re:What if the person is innocent? on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    Actually, every single government action is suspicious. I have yet to see even one that proves me wrong...

  21. Re:What if the person is innocent? on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    Why proposed? I thought it is already accepted, and next year you have to provide your medical history along with your tax return.

  22. Re:Misunderstanding on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    Since when the purpose of the police is to find you "innocent"???

  23. Re:California has done this for a almost a decade on SCOTUS Says DNA Collection Permissible After Arrest · · Score: 1

    Try to repeat your sentence, once your DNA is in the database, and you cannot land ANY job, because of that.....

  24. Re:Point 3 will be fiercely faught. on CRTC Unveils New Wireless Code To Protect Canadian Customers · · Score: 1

    .....expressley....
    Which means that it cannot be part of the standard contract. You have to explicitly require, and agree to this new provision....

  25. Re:Point 3 will be fiercely faught. on CRTC Unveils New Wireless Code To Protect Canadian Customers · · Score: 1

    You are missing the point. If BELL could charge you only $50 max for example, no matter what you do, it means that once you spend more than $50, your service will be frozen, until next billing cycle.