According to the summary, it's where the string "ugly hack" appears in the code - so it would consider this comment (and yours) to be an "ugly hack"...
Your local work environment must be really desperate for people if knowing how to use a toothbrush and soap is supposed to be a relevant qualification.
I wasn't replying to the question, I was replying to your comment:
So you want use open source software but you don't want to open source your own?
I was drawing attention to the fact that GitHub use open source software, but don't open source their own (although if you're wallet is fat enough, they'll license you a black-box appliance to run on your own hosts) - which is what you seem to be criticising the question for.
Mostly because many of those projects weren't using Berkely for what it was intended for, but had no better solution for their use case - these days, there are several alternatives (SQLite being one of the more popular examples)
Slashdot Mirror
that's just my experience
No, really it's not. Plenty of us have experienced this...
According to the summary, it's where the string "ugly hack" appears in the code - so it would consider this comment (and yours) to be an "ugly hack"...
Degreelessness Mode?
I ask that you please do STFU and allow those of us who DO wish to stand up for our rights to discuss the issues of standing up for our rights.
It seems you're not a believer in GP's right to freedom of speech - no wonder you post as AC.
This is a deadly intolerant religion
... as opposed to the other kind?
Religious madness
And right there we have "tautology of the week"
Who reads email anymore?
The NSA?
It's mostly based on the fact that gold is pretty...
I see good code or I see bad code.
I see very little good code. I see an awful lot of bad code
There's always been buyers for good code.
Sadly, there also always been buyers for bad code.
Not on the BBC, they don't.
This has happened with regenerations before - Romana (Lalla Ward) made a point of taking the likeness of someone she'd encountered previously
Javascript shits on that entire model,
No, Javascript allows dumb web monkeys to shit on that model - there's a big difference.
Microsoft, are you listening?
Probably not.
Your local work environment must be really desperate for people if knowing how to use a toothbrush and soap is supposed to be a relevant qualification.
Look up "necessary, but not sufficient."
Working 80 hours a week is dumb.
I don't hire dumb people.
I wasn't replying to the question, I was replying to your comment:
So you want use open source software but you don't want to open source your own?
I was drawing attention to the fact that GitHub use open source software, but don't open source their own (although if you're wallet is fat enough, they'll license you a black-box appliance to run on your own hosts) - which is what you seem to be criticising the question for.
You have my deepest sympathy - for using VSS, at least.
On the other hand, I have no way of knowing if you deserve to get punched in the face several times a day...
Mostly because many of those projects weren't using Berkely for what it was intended for, but had no better solution for their use case - these days, there are several alternatives (SQLite being one of the more popular examples)
Does SVN still force all my pending changes into one commit? (and one commit message to rule them all?)
For what it's worth, SVN has never done this - you can specify which files to commit in a given changeset.
Does SVN still force my commits to be immediately visible to everyone else
Not if you don't want it to. You can configure access control such that everyone has their own private branches on the server.
(but despite the fact that neither of these are valid complaints, git is still a much better tool that svn IMO).
50% of people are dumber than the median, not the average.
You mean like GitHub?
Yeah, I realised that about 0.00000001 seconds after I hit submit - ah well :-)
Stay hoopy, frood.
Is that you, Ford?
Detection is more efficient; reporting is WAY more efficient.
Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so.