Nice gaslighting. The only way one could feel personally attacked by the previous administration is if you were listening to Alex Jones, Glen Beck or, (inclusively) a nazi.
When you hold the left to their own standards, it suddenly isn't race baiting. And you haven't figured out why the "they're a nazi" stuff doesn't work anymore.
Annnnnndddddd...that's how the ignorance rolls. Going by your reasoning, Labor are hardcore nazi's that want to kill the jews. And the Conservatives are hardcore communists that also want to kill the jews.
No, actually I didn't apply "mess" to the entire field. But you seem to have a serious problem understanding the politics of this. If you think I'm cherry picking, why don't you go ask the media why they're already lining up the McCaskill stories, that the reason she lost was because of Russian bots.
Do you remember what was happening 4 years ago when Cantor lost? I'll give you a hint, it's two words. Too bad, your understanding of the logic of why this happened is fundamentally flawed. Do you know why the democrats lost over 1500 positions of government power from US senate to state senates?
This isn't hard to understand if you're not politically ignorant. Just a tip, you need to polish your understanding of politics. The failure to communicate is due to your ignorance on the subject.
Note that I didn't actually say the other parties were better, just that ukip are pretty authoritarian and the stuff I mentioned isn't even the worst of it. Their policies on women's health are pretty disturbing.
Note, you continue dancing around the question. And believe that a political party that has a free speech agenda is authoritarian. That's pretty funny, because the policies by the other political parties on mens health don't exist.
To Trump, lying about embassies, trade deals, his own policies, the election, the inauguration, healthcare, tax cuts, the deficit and immigration?
So let's go through those. Embassies and the confirmations are still hung up in the senate(thank the DNC). The election? wut? the inaguration? wut? Are either of those his promises. Healthcare? Why not ask the rino's and dino's that refused to vote after stating they would, or did previously. But knew it wouldn't count under obama. Well at least you're not being penalized if you're refusing to pay. Tax cuts? He did that. Maybe you're just one of those idiots living in a state that offsets their taxation by offering credits. You know, like California, NY, Illinois. People in TX, TN, FL, GA are quite happy. Deficit? Only president that has paid down the debt instead of repeatedly stacking it. Immigration? Oh that one's good. Why not ask the democrats why they refused to back his better offer then the one they were demanding. Besides, I'd be happier if ICE went out of their way to deport every single illegal.
Yes, and I see Trump as fundamentally dishonest.
Well, when you're getting your news from someone that tells you that? I can't help you.
And let me guess, you don't know how to use powershell either. Which FYI, let's you go beyond 18hrs. How do you tech illiterate people even get anywhere in life without knowing how to use a CLI.
They should ask, but have a limit. "Okay, user, you've postponed for 6 days. The system WILL reboot and update tomorrow a 2 AM. Save your work by then or else!!!"
You know they do ask. There's a setting called "active time" which most people never ever set. If you set it for 23hrs, it will wait until that 1hr that's open to popup a dialog saying "we want to install updates" do it now or "reschedule for another time."
Politics are extremely personal these days. Probably because the administration supports so much that attacks people personally.
Uh, the previous administration attacked people personally all the time. How do you not know this? He even engaged in actions that most sane people would label as "race baiting."
That's step 1. From Hitler literally. Lugenpresse.
So Obama was literally Hitler. Remember when he thew press groups out, and stated that specific media organizations and reporters were an enemy of his government? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
How do you feel about the administration ejecting reporters who ask tough questions under the normal protocol from press briefings? Where does that fall in this spectrum? I would say it falls much closer towards authoritarianism and deviates significantly from "opinion".
Which reporters? You mean CNN, where the guy went out of his way to try and derail the conference with Kim? Or where the CNN guy went out of his way to scream questions from the back, and then claim that the president refused to answer them? Or the reporter who decided being a protester was the best solution?
Hey aren't people entitled to opinions? There's no requirement that journalists be completely unbiased. The ones with integrity try not to be but that's a separate issue from everything we're talking about here.
Sure are, but how many reporters do you know of that are actually doing the job of reporting the news. Not writing the news from an opinion perspective laced with their own political agenda, and their networks pushing this as reporting - not opinion.
The RNC simply hasn't been hacked to release internal emails. You don't think the RNC isn't spoon feeding conservative outlets like Fox News talking points and stories to publish? You can't be that naive.
Possibly, but considering we have no proof. And there are apparently plenty of democrats and progressives working inside fox news, you'd think something like that would have been leaked by now right?
Speculating what the OP meant was how the administration is threatening to revoke security clearances for former intelligence agency officials still doing work for the government because they said unkind things about the President personally. He has the legal authority to do so, but you have to admit it's remarkably petty.
Tell me something. Why do you need a security clearance when you no longer are working for the government? No really explain, because some numbnut from NBC I think it was, went out of their way to explain that the real reason they need these is because people still feed them classified information which they then use in the news.
I must not be up on my black activist groups because last I knew they considered it a good thing. There have been numerous officers who turned off their body cameras (that keep recording for a while after they're switched off) in order to do illegal things like plant evidence. There were multiple incidents in Baltimore if I recall. Stopping that kind of abuse benefits everybody except dirty cops.
Oh it is a good thing, hell a lot of cops were cheering for it because they were demanding them back shit almost a decade ago when I was in training to become one. Everyone wanted them, because it would be easier to show how force is justified in a situation and all that. Various black groups are now screaming that they're a civil rights violation, it's obvious why though. Because they show that the banger(who was a good boy who did nuffin' wrong) was pulling a gun, or something else stupid that led them to being shot.
Obamacare did limit healthcare cost growth, until the individual mandate was repealed. Socialized medicine would control those costs even more effectively. Every other developed country in the world does universal healthcare. They also have an average of 10 years higher life expectancies.
Come on do your research. Obamacare increased insurance costs by massive amounts. Hell for a little while, I was covering the $1100/mo insurance for a buddy of mine in FL. His family coverage went from $300 to that, with a minimum amount of $10k before they'd start covering anything.
Compassion does not equal "open borders." We have always been a nation of immigrants (where the ones who have been here long enough to forget they were immigrants are racist against the new generation). Chain migration is just a cruel way of saying family migration. Put yourself in your own shoes. In a zombie apocalypse, if you could decide what family to save (limited to parents, spouses, siblings, and children), is there any you would be willing to leave behind?
You mean legal immigrants. FYI both of my parents are legal immigrants, both came to Canada after WWII. One from East Germany, the other from Japan. Guess what? Everyone except their immediate family stayed there, they didn't want to come here. They could have, if they got in line legally. So tell me, why do you want to give a free pass to an entire extended family that will put a burden on your country. Need an example? Remember those 80k syrian refugees that canada brought in? 10% have a job, 90% do not. There isn't exactly a shortage of jobs in various industries here.
So if a Republican challenges an incumbent by communicating locally with a message that resonates with people it's a good thing and part of the fight against corruption./quote No, but your attempt to understand what I said was rather poor in the first place. Read more slowly, and remember I pointed out the "mess" of that second primary race, because the incumbent thought they had NO chance of losing.
Strange you seem to be giving a lot of shit to this.
Well, I'm glad to see you're wearing your bigotry on your sleeve. You should also add the fascist one while you're at it after that rant.
See, like most progressives that think that they're actually living in reality too, just like you. The problem is, you don't. Want to know how people can spot this? Because you promote things, open border, relaxed immigration. But do nothing, congratulations you just created a new welfare class of people. Funny that you claim "conservative tribal bullshit nearly fucked this country" so, why don't you explain why the democrats have been engaging in a purity spiral for the last 15 years or so. Getting more and more extreme at every pass.
I'm not sure what's worse, that you believe the garbage you're spewing. Or you're so stupid that you believe the garbage you're spewing. Want to know how to make the world a better place? You send people to those shitholes around the world, and make the people invest in their own country. Solves lots of problems. Of course in your stupidty, you'd call that "colonialism" or "racism" or some other 'ism' and screech until your kettle popped.
Honest politicians are a bit like unicorns. There's been lots of talk about it but so far none have surfaced.
Well that's the funny thing, because they do exist. Trump is one for an example, he hasn't gotten all of the things he's wanted done but a lot more of it. More then Obama, Bush or Clinton. Kinda like Rob Ford or Mike Harris up here in Ontario, the first is doing a pretty good job of holding his promises. The second stuck nearly word-for-word to his parties political manifesto.
Imagine making such comment where you not only dive off the front end, but climb back on and go off the back. I didn't have to state the, I made an observation based on UK politics.
So in bizario-animojo land, where you expect people to integrate into society it's a bad thing. Hey did you ever wonder why for so long dumped their garbage at the border when emigrating to a new country?
Yep, looks like their immigration policies are pretty good. If they want to become a citizen, they can apply legally. Yep, looks like providing that accommodation rule is pretty good too, remember that whole "integrate into society" bit? I mean, where's the good in allowing let's say a muslim convicted of being a terrorist access to the people who radicalized him in the first place. Something that's happening in UK prisons now.
Nah, that's not oppressive. That's people wanting to preserve their cultural identity. You know what *is* oppressive? When the government tells you that you must accept *their* cultural identity or face punishment for not doing so. If you think that sounds like SJW's, then you're just proving you don't know what they are. Don't colour me surprised, after all you couldn't figure out the difference between an activist and a 3rd party troll during the time of gamergate. It's been nearly 4 years, I'd hoped you'd gotten better at least at that.
It's okay. $20Cdn wouldn't even fill a gas tank half full in Canada OR the US these days. But, your bigotry is in full swing. Keep going, because you're an awesome recruitment tool.
So... You think I voted for communists? I think there is still a British communist party but they didn't stand in my area.
Didn't say that. I said you voted for a boot to the neck, the only party not promoting that in the UK, is UKIP.
Specifically who do you think are communists in British politics?
Well Labor sure isn't short of it these days, they've even got the anti-semitism of the old(USSR) days running in the party to boot. So are you saying that you no longer want to leave the UK, and impose communism in the new host country you want to move to?
Problem though, about half of the republicans are RINO's owned by corporate handlers via donations. It's actually far worse among the democrats these days, don't believe me? Just look at which group is doing what. Republicans trying to push out RINO's are in the neighborhoods, asking what people want. They're challenging incumbents, that's good, and they're winning too. But look at the mess with democrats, some are running off to hollywood interests to have them craft their message. Some are simply ignoring challenges(one reason why Ocasio-Cortez won despite her pro-commie message), and some are simply ignoring the race believing that they'll win because pollsters are saying "blue wave." They're so out of touch that they think they don't even need to worry about it.
You could have simply made the post "I'm a bigot" with nothing else and saved yourself the trouble. But I'm really liking the unhinged craziness of your post, I'm gonna lay down a frosty $20Cdn(actual value $13.73 USD), that you live in a major city and are politically insulated.
Or...could it be that there's a swath of progressives on Twitter who are perpetually offended, and go out of their way to flag everything "republican and conservative" because it offends their delicate sensibilities. That seems far more likely, especially since Twitter went out of their way to delete parody accounts(which were clearly labeled), of Liberal Party of Canada(LPC) members. The parody accounts of Unified Conservative Party members(that's wild rose/progressive conservative in Alberta) and Progressive Conservative Party(Ontario), and Conservative Party of Canada(official opposition) are still active.
I'll give you a hint, it was the followers of LPC that went out of their way to flag those accounts repeatedly until they were taken down. You can still find their bragging in the cdnpol, ontpol and abpol hashtags.
Slashdot Mirror
Nice gaslighting. The only way one could feel personally attacked by the previous administration is if you were listening to Alex Jones, Glen Beck or, (inclusively) a nazi.
When you hold the left to their own standards, it suddenly isn't race baiting. And you haven't figured out why the "they're a nazi" stuff doesn't work anymore.
Nope. It was actually you who did that labeling, and you haven't even been honest about politics in your own country, let alone another.
You seem to be fundamentally ignorant, otherwise you'd have actually shown where I was dishonest. Pretty shit attempt.
Wait
UKIP are Fascists
Annnnnndddddd...that's how the ignorance rolls. Going by your reasoning, Labor are hardcore nazi's that want to kill the jews. And the Conservatives are hardcore communists that also want to kill the jews.
No, actually I didn't apply "mess" to the entire field. But you seem to have a serious problem understanding the politics of this. If you think I'm cherry picking, why don't you go ask the media why they're already lining up the McCaskill stories, that the reason she lost was because of Russian bots.
Do you remember what was happening 4 years ago when Cantor lost? I'll give you a hint, it's two words. Too bad, your understanding of the logic of why this happened is fundamentally flawed. Do you know why the democrats lost over 1500 positions of government power from US senate to state senates?
This isn't hard to understand if you're not politically ignorant. Just a tip, you need to polish your understanding of politics. The failure to communicate is due to your ignorance on the subject.
Note that I didn't actually say the other parties were better, just that ukip are pretty authoritarian and the stuff I mentioned isn't even the worst of it. Their policies on women's health are pretty disturbing.
Note, you continue dancing around the question. And believe that a political party that has a free speech agenda is authoritarian. That's pretty funny, because the policies by the other political parties on mens health don't exist.
To Trump, lying about embassies, trade deals, his own policies, the election, the inauguration, healthcare, tax cuts, the deficit and immigration?
So let's go through those. Embassies and the confirmations are still hung up in the senate(thank the DNC). The election? wut? the inaguration? wut? Are either of those his promises. Healthcare? Why not ask the rino's and dino's that refused to vote after stating they would, or did previously. But knew it wouldn't count under obama. Well at least you're not being penalized if you're refusing to pay. Tax cuts? He did that. Maybe you're just one of those idiots living in a state that offsets their taxation by offering credits. You know, like California, NY, Illinois. People in TX, TN, FL, GA are quite happy. Deficit? Only president that has paid down the debt instead of repeatedly stacking it. Immigration? Oh that one's good. Why not ask the democrats why they refused to back his better offer then the one they were demanding. Besides, I'd be happier if ICE went out of their way to deport every single illegal.
Yes, and I see Trump as fundamentally dishonest.
Well, when you're getting your news from someone that tells you that? I can't help you.
And let me guess, you don't know how to use powershell either. Which FYI, let's you go beyond 18hrs. How do you tech illiterate people even get anywhere in life without knowing how to use a CLI.
They should ask, but have a limit. "Okay, user, you've postponed for 6 days. The system WILL reboot and update tomorrow a 2 AM. Save your work by then or else!!!"
You know they do ask. There's a setting called "active time" which most people never ever set. If you set it for 23hrs, it will wait until that 1hr that's open to popup a dialog saying "we want to install updates" do it now or "reschedule for another time."
Politics are extremely personal these days. Probably because the administration supports so much that attacks people personally.
Uh, the previous administration attacked people personally all the time. How do you not know this? He even engaged in actions that most sane people would label as "race baiting."
That's step 1. From Hitler literally. Lugenpresse.
So Obama was literally Hitler. Remember when he thew press groups out, and stated that specific media organizations and reporters were an enemy of his government? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
How do you feel about the administration ejecting reporters who ask tough questions under the normal protocol from press briefings? Where does that fall in this spectrum? I would say it falls much closer towards authoritarianism and deviates significantly from "opinion".
Which reporters? You mean CNN, where the guy went out of his way to try and derail the conference with Kim? Or where the CNN guy went out of his way to scream questions from the back, and then claim that the president refused to answer them? Or the reporter who decided being a protester was the best solution?
Hey aren't people entitled to opinions? There's no requirement that journalists be completely unbiased. The ones with integrity try not to be but that's a separate issue from everything we're talking about here.
Sure are, but how many reporters do you know of that are actually doing the job of reporting the news. Not writing the news from an opinion perspective laced with their own political agenda, and their networks pushing this as reporting - not opinion.
The RNC simply hasn't been hacked to release internal emails. You don't think the RNC isn't spoon feeding conservative outlets like Fox News talking points and stories to publish? You can't be that naive.
Possibly, but considering we have no proof. And there are apparently plenty of democrats and progressives working inside fox news, you'd think something like that would have been leaked by now right?
Speculating what the OP meant was how the administration is threatening to revoke security clearances for former intelligence agency officials still doing work for the government because they said unkind things about the President personally. He has the legal authority to do so, but you have to admit it's remarkably petty.
Tell me something. Why do you need a security clearance when you no longer are working for the government? No really explain, because some numbnut from NBC I think it was, went out of their way to explain that the real reason they need these is because people still feed them classified information which they then use in the news.
I must not be up on my black activist groups because last I knew they considered it a good thing. There have been numerous officers who turned off their body cameras (that keep recording for a while after they're switched off) in order to do illegal things like plant evidence. There were multiple incidents in Baltimore if I recall. Stopping that kind of abuse benefits everybody except dirty cops.
Oh it is a good thing, hell a lot of cops were cheering for it because they were demanding them back shit almost a decade ago when I was in training to become one. Everyone wanted them, because it would be easier to show how force is justified in a situation and all that. Various black groups are now screaming that they're a civil rights violation, it's obvious why though. Because they show that the banger(who was a good boy who did nuffin' wrong) was pulling a gun, or something else stupid that led them to being shot.
Come on, do your research.
Obamacare did limit healthcare cost growth, until the individual mandate was repealed. Socialized medicine would control those costs even more effectively. Every other developed country in the world does universal healthcare. They also have an average of 10 years higher life expectancies.
Come on do your research. Obamacare increased insurance costs by massive amounts. Hell for a little while, I was covering the $1100/mo insurance for a buddy of mine in FL. His family coverage went from $300 to that, with a minimum amount of $10k before they'd start covering anything.
Compassion does not equal "open borders." We have always been a nation of immigrants (where the ones who have been here long enough to forget they were immigrants are racist against the new generation). Chain migration is just a cruel way of saying family migration. Put yourself in your own shoes. In a zombie apocalypse, if you could decide what family to save (limited to parents, spouses, siblings, and children), is there any you would be willing to leave behind?
You mean legal immigrants. FYI both of my parents are legal immigrants, both came to Canada after WWII. One from East Germany, the other from Japan. Guess what? Everyone except their immediate family stayed there, they didn't want to come here. They could have, if they got in line legally. So tell me, why do you want to give a free pass to an entire extended family that will put a burden on your country. Need an example? Remember those 80k syrian refugees that canada brought in? 10% have a job, 90% do not. There isn't exactly a shortage of jobs in various industries here.
And that ladies and gentlemen is the full-grown birth of someone who has TDS so bad, that they should go visit a shrink.
So if a Republican challenges an incumbent by communicating locally with a message that resonates with people it's a good thing and part of the fight against corruption./quote
No, but your attempt to understand what I said was rather poor in the first place. Read more slowly, and remember I pointed out the "mess" of that second primary race, because the incumbent thought they had NO chance of losing.
Strange you seem to be giving a lot of shit to this.
Well, I'm glad to see you're wearing your bigotry on your sleeve. You should also add the fascist one while you're at it after that rant.
See, like most progressives that think that they're actually living in reality too, just like you. The problem is, you don't. Want to know how people can spot this? Because you promote things, open border, relaxed immigration. But do nothing, congratulations you just created a new welfare class of people. Funny that you claim "conservative tribal bullshit nearly fucked this country" so, why don't you explain why the democrats have been engaging in a purity spiral for the last 15 years or so. Getting more and more extreme at every pass.
I'm not sure what's worse, that you believe the garbage you're spewing. Or you're so stupid that you believe the garbage you're spewing. Want to know how to make the world a better place? You send people to those shitholes around the world, and make the people invest in their own country. Solves lots of problems. Of course in your stupidty, you'd call that "colonialism" or "racism" or some other 'ism' and screech until your kettle popped.
Honest politicians are a bit like unicorns. There's been lots of talk about it but so far none have surfaced.
Well that's the funny thing, because they do exist. Trump is one for an example, he hasn't gotten all of the things he's wanted done but a lot more of it. More then Obama, Bush or Clinton. Kinda like Rob Ford or Mike Harris up here in Ontario, the first is doing a pretty good job of holding his promises. The second stuck nearly word-for-word to his parties political manifesto.
Maybe you're not paying attention?
Imagine making such comment where you not only dive off the front end, but climb back on and go off the back. I didn't have to state the, I made an observation based on UK politics.
So in bizario-animojo land, where you expect people to integrate into society it's a bad thing. Hey did you ever wonder why for so long dumped their garbage at the border when emigrating to a new country?
Yep, looks like their immigration policies are pretty good. If they want to become a citizen, they can apply legally. Yep, looks like providing that accommodation rule is pretty good too, remember that whole "integrate into society" bit? I mean, where's the good in allowing let's say a muslim convicted of being a terrorist access to the people who radicalized him in the first place. Something that's happening in UK prisons now.
Nah, that's not oppressive. That's people wanting to preserve their cultural identity. You know what *is* oppressive? When the government tells you that you must accept *their* cultural identity or face punishment for not doing so. If you think that sounds like SJW's, then you're just proving you don't know what they are. Don't colour me surprised, after all you couldn't figure out the difference between an activist and a 3rd party troll during the time of gamergate. It's been nearly 4 years, I'd hoped you'd gotten better at least at that.
It's okay. $20Cdn wouldn't even fill a gas tank half full in Canada OR the US these days. But, your bigotry is in full swing. Keep going, because you're an awesome recruitment tool.
So... You think I voted for communists? I think there is still a British communist party but they didn't stand in my area.
Didn't say that. I said you voted for a boot to the neck, the only party not promoting that in the UK, is UKIP.
Specifically who do you think are communists in British politics?
Well Labor sure isn't short of it these days, they've even got the anti-semitism of the old(USSR) days running in the party to boot. So are you saying that you no longer want to leave the UK, and impose communism in the new host country you want to move to?
If that was true, we could as well fence off capitol hill and declare it a prison. Less work.
I should be clear, he was impeached for lying while in office under oath. You gotta follow the rules, looks like you're wanting to skip a step.
Problem though, about half of the republicans are RINO's owned by corporate handlers via donations. It's actually far worse among the democrats these days, don't believe me? Just look at which group is doing what. Republicans trying to push out RINO's are in the neighborhoods, asking what people want. They're challenging incumbents, that's good, and they're winning too. But look at the mess with democrats, some are running off to hollywood interests to have them craft their message. Some are simply ignoring challenges(one reason why Ocasio-Cortez won despite her pro-commie message), and some are simply ignoring the race believing that they'll win because pollsters are saying "blue wave." They're so out of touch that they think they don't even need to worry about it.
You could have simply made the post "I'm a bigot" with nothing else and saved yourself the trouble. But I'm really liking the unhinged craziness of your post, I'm gonna lay down a frosty $20Cdn(actual value $13.73 USD), that you live in a major city and are politically insulated.
Or...could it be that there's a swath of progressives on Twitter who are perpetually offended, and go out of their way to flag everything "republican and conservative" because it offends their delicate sensibilities. That seems far more likely, especially since Twitter went out of their way to delete parody accounts(which were clearly labeled), of Liberal Party of Canada(LPC) members. The parody accounts of Unified Conservative Party members(that's wild rose/progressive conservative in Alberta) and Progressive Conservative Party(Ontario), and Conservative Party of Canada(official opposition) are still active.
I'll give you a hint, it was the followers of LPC that went out of their way to flag those accounts repeatedly until they were taken down. You can still find their bragging in the cdnpol, ontpol and abpol hashtags.
I'm sure this all makes sense in your head. One thing I'd like to pick up on though...
About as much sense, as your post made in yours.
Who do you think I voted for?
Apparently a boot to the throat, repeatedly. You were the one praising communism and wanting to impose it on other people.
Yeah, but you say the same thing about breitbart and fox news. Your reflection must stare back at you, and comment "At least I'm being honest."