Yes, but will you have to absorb that energy once you stop? You'd have to bring a planet as heat sink... Energy can not be destroyed, only converted and that usually goes to heat.
It would be awesome if you could store it as potential energy available for your next warp jump, but there are some entropy issues there.
I find information on the intraweb of my company to be far more often true then information on the internet. However there isn't any information on warp drives there so your companies intraweb is probably different
That's untrue: something can be theoretically possible, but outside our means now. That's far more impossible then "There is no way it could ever become possible".
Consider flying. In 1683 (1 century before the Montgolfier brothers) flying was impossible. The technology wasn't far enough. However it was clearly not absolutely impossible, since it was done a century later. FTL flying was absolutely impossible then, since physics now tell us you can't accelerate to a speed above lightspeed. Different gradations of impossible do exist.
If we view the point even more granular we will see there are near infinitely many gradations of impossible. Flying was impossible in 1683. Heavyier then air flying was more impossible in 1683, since it needed more technological advancement. Flying faster than the speed of sound was even more impossible, since it needed even more. All in all, impossible is a scalar at best. It has a range, from "absolutely impossible" to "Already done". Each value in between is valid.
The figure shows that failures
do not increase when the average temperature increases.
In fact, there is a clear trend showing that lower
temperatures are associated with higher failure rates.
Only at very high temperatures is there a slight reversal
of this trend.
See the end of page 5 of the whitepaper, beginning page 6 for a graphical view.
The high temperatures of the quote are 45 to 50 C.
Yes, but that's a controlled environment. Not a home where someone can decide it's a good plan to shoot the harddisk with a shotgun (for data destruction purposes).
No. The mu metal around those magnets does that. That stuff is awesome. It "bends" the low frequency EM fields. If you ever have a harddisk magnet with the mu metal bracket you can see it for yourself: the magnet side will stick to ferrometals, the mu metal side doesn't.
Somehow I usually interpret it as sarcasm, or a euphemism. For example: She had some huge "eyes". It usually doesn't work, but it causes enough hilarity not to change it.
My roomba 564 vacuums daily. This is quite a change from weekly or biweekly which I used to do. The house is so much cleaner now. I have a dog, though not a labrador (a crosbreed, not unlike a Dutsch sheperd dog). She doesn't shed a tenth of a labrador, so that matters a lot. In the shedding weeks (only a couple of weeks a year) I need to use the high capacity bin and empty it once every two days. Usually the normal bin lasts 4 days or so (unless I have a party. My friends don't make a terrible mess, but more people = more mess) The roomba cleans well. Not everything is gone in one round, but usually in 2 rounds it's clean For me this is a great improvement over up to two weeks. If I am going to have a party that night I just order it to clean once extra while I go to a shop to get enough beer and snacks. As for the battery: Mine is a year old and the only time I had trouble with the battery was when the brush module was almost dead. After I replaced that (for free although out of warranty) the roomba had power enough to clean my room 1,5 times (with the same batteries). I assume they are NiMH batteries, but I cant check at the moment. I love the roomba (in a non-romatic way) and if it dies (and I am content with the life time) I am going to get a new one.
There are IP67 waterproof USB cables. These have a screw-on mantle to protect the plug from water. You can insert a normal USB plug in these ports and these cables can be inserted in a normal USB port (but in both cases you lose the waterproofness).
I haven't seen a solution to connect it under water while maintaining waterproofness. There may be some (conductive) water between the contacts after the seal is tightened, creating a short. If I were to design an USB connector for that I'd try a slow flow of compressed air to force the water out.
Then again: none of these solutions are really in a size applicable for a phone.
The contacts could be gold plated to prevent chemical corrosion. Since there is power there is probably a way to protect from galvanic corrosion (or use a sacrificial galvanic anode. Dunno if that'll work with gold though). Despite the name, gold plating isn't really expensive. The most expensive part is the name.
I am not a native English speaker. As far as I know "have" is included in the "You've" (contraction of "you have"). The "too" is correct according to your own words, since "too much" and "too loud" are grammatically the same. What is wrong?
That depends. In some cases it's easy to be reasonably sure it's the killer's DNA. For example: if someone is murdered by suffocation, with clear-cut signs of a struggle and has blood under his/her nails then it's reasonable to assume it's the killers'. If a girl had sex after she was murdered and the semen is found then the guy who's semen it is has "something to explain". But I agree with the gist of what you are saying. DNA evidence can be circumstantial. In many cases it's circumstantial and sometimes it's used as absolute, which is wrong.
There is a perfect ratio, it just doesn't prevent death. The perfect ratio minimizes long strain on muscles that can't handle it. It will only work when combined with enough switches. The perfect ratio is highly personal. Some people are harder, which just means they can handle further deviations from their personal perfect ratio. My hypothesis is that the hardiness can be increased by yoga and fitness.
All is AFAIK, no warrantees, no professional education in ergonomics.
The steampunk option would be a pendulum in antiphase to the rocking of the desk itself, to steady it. In practice I'd advise some crosswires to steady it.
If someone isn't going to understand attoseconds then he can understand that its mindbogglingly short. That's where the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 comes in. If you can understand attoseconds it seems useless information. You seem to be in a third group: you can't understand attoseconds, but the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 is to layman-ish for you. You complain because you cannot understand that someone would neither understand attoseconds nor 6.7x10^-17 (of which there are many). Now I do agree with complains about only displaying the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 , for that would skip the useful information for scientificly minded people, but that is not an issue here. Attoseconds are used, which are the scientific name.
I misunderstood your use of "dropping". In orbital mechanics "dropping" gets a weird meaning. Now that I understand what you meant I can see that it is quite logical and well thought out.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, but will you have to absorb that energy once you stop? You'd have to bring a planet as heat sink...
Energy can not be destroyed, only converted and that usually goes to heat.
It would be awesome if you could store it as potential energy available for your next warp jump, but there are some entropy issues there.
I find information on the intraweb of my company to be far more often true then information on the internet. However there isn't any information on warp drives there so your companies intraweb is probably different
That's untrue: something can be theoretically possible, but outside our means now. That's far more impossible then "There is no way it could ever become possible".
Consider flying. In 1683 (1 century before the Montgolfier brothers) flying was impossible. The technology wasn't far enough. However it was clearly not absolutely impossible, since it was done a century later. FTL flying was absolutely impossible then, since physics now tell us you can't accelerate to a speed above lightspeed.
Different gradations of impossible do exist.
If we view the point even more granular we will see there are near infinitely many gradations of impossible. Flying was impossible in 1683. Heavyier then air flying was more impossible in 1683, since it needed more technological advancement. Flying faster than the speed of sound was even more impossible, since it needed even more.
All in all, impossible is a scalar at best. It has a range, from "absolutely impossible" to "Already done". Each value in between is valid.
But that won't stop us cat haters protesting in order to get a law against cats as "pets".
The figure shows that failures do not increase when the average temperature increases. In fact, there is a clear trend showing that lower temperatures are associated with higher failure rates. Only at very high temperatures is there a slight reversal of this trend.
See the end of page 5 of the whitepaper, beginning page 6 for a graphical view.
The high temperatures of the quote are 45 to 50 C.
True, those features are reserved for the SecureErase version.
Yes, but that's a controlled environment. Not a home where someone can decide it's a good plan to shoot the harddisk with a shotgun (for data destruction purposes).
With magic! Or in case of a ssd it's charge in a floating gate mosfet.
No. The mu metal around those magnets does that. That stuff is awesome. It "bends" the low frequency EM fields. If you ever have a harddisk magnet with the mu metal bracket you can see it for yourself: the magnet side will stick to ferrometals, the mu metal side doesn't.
Somehow I usually interpret it as sarcasm, or a euphemism.
For example: She had some huge "eyes".
It usually doesn't work, but it causes enough hilarity not to change it.
My roomba 564 vacuums daily. This is quite a change from weekly or biweekly which I used to do. The house is so much cleaner now.
I have a dog, though not a labrador (a crosbreed, not unlike a Dutsch sheperd dog). She doesn't shed a tenth of a labrador, so that matters a lot. In the shedding weeks (only a couple of weeks a year) I need to use the high capacity bin and empty it once every two days. Usually the normal bin lasts 4 days or so (unless I have a party. My friends don't make a terrible mess, but more people = more mess)
The roomba cleans well. Not everything is gone in one round, but usually in 2 rounds it's clean For me this is a great improvement over up to two weeks. If I am going to have a party that night I just order it to clean once extra while I go to a shop to get enough beer and snacks.
As for the battery: Mine is a year old and the only time I had trouble with the battery was when the brush module was almost dead. After I replaced that (for free although out of warranty) the roomba had power enough to clean my room 1,5 times (with the same batteries). I assume they are NiMH batteries, but I cant check at the moment.
I love the roomba (in a non-romatic way) and if it dies (and I am content with the life time) I am going to get a new one.
There are IP67 waterproof USB cables. These have a screw-on mantle to protect the plug from water. You can insert a normal USB plug in these ports and these cables can be inserted in a normal USB port (but in both cases you lose the waterproofness).
I haven't seen a solution to connect it under water while maintaining waterproofness. There may be some (conductive) water between the contacts after the seal is tightened, creating a short. If I were to design an USB connector for that I'd try a slow flow of compressed air to force the water out.
Then again: none of these solutions are really in a size applicable for a phone.
The contacts could be gold plated to prevent chemical corrosion. Since there is power there is probably a way to protect from galvanic corrosion (or use a sacrificial galvanic anode. Dunno if that'll work with gold though).
Despite the name, gold plating isn't really expensive. The most expensive part is the name.
I am not a native English speaker.
As far as I know "have" is included in the "You've" (contraction of "you have").
The "too" is correct according to your own words, since "too much" and "too loud" are grammatically the same.
What is wrong?
In this case the police claims the murder seemed professional. Raping a kid doesn't seem like the profile of a professional assassin.
That depends. In some cases it's easy to be reasonably sure it's the killer's DNA.
For example: if someone is murdered by suffocation, with clear-cut signs of a struggle and has blood under his/her nails then it's reasonable to assume it's the killers'. If a girl had sex after she was murdered and the semen is found then the guy who's semen it is has "something to explain".
But I agree with the gist of what you are saying. DNA evidence can be circumstantial. In many cases it's circumstantial and sometimes it's used as absolute, which is wrong.
No, he has a colleague named will whom he wants to crush under his desk.
Or a DLC surface.
There is a perfect ratio, it just doesn't prevent death.
The perfect ratio minimizes long strain on muscles that can't handle it. It will only work when combined with enough switches. The perfect ratio is highly personal.
Some people are harder, which just means they can handle further deviations from their personal perfect ratio. My hypothesis is that the hardiness can be increased by yoga and fitness.
All is AFAIK, no warrantees, no professional education in ergonomics.
The steampunk option would be a pendulum in antiphase to the rocking of the desk itself, to steady it.
In practice I'd advise some crosswires to steady it.
A real ninja desk would be impossible to find. Who knows, maybe you already have them in your office!
Ergo: these are fake ninja desks.
If someone isn't going to understand attoseconds then he can understand that its mindbogglingly short. That's where the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 comes in. If you can understand attoseconds it seems useless information.
You seem to be in a third group: you can't understand attoseconds, but the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 is to layman-ish for you. You complain because you cannot understand that someone would neither understand attoseconds nor 6.7x10^-17 (of which there are many).
Now I do agree with complains about only displaying the 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000 , for that would skip the useful information for scientificly minded people, but that is not an issue here. Attoseconds are used, which are the scientific name.
Unless you're the Doctor.
I misunderstood your use of "dropping". In orbital mechanics "dropping" gets a weird meaning. Now that I understand what you meant I can see that it is quite logical and well thought out.
All that science is are varying layers of abstraction over math