You seem to expect that high fines would not discourage false DMCA notices, because the filers would expect to get away with it, because they currently get away with it. But they currently get away with it not because it's hard to detect, or hard to identify the perpetrator, or low enough impact that nobody bothers to do anything, but because it's not illegal. If it became illegal, the facts that it would be easy to identify the filer, and the owner of the suppressed material is significantly impacted mean they'd be very likely to get caught.
Certainly, I expect that some would still file false notices, expecting to not get caught. But I think the majority of _current_ false-filers would consider it too risky and stop.
high fines don't discourage humans from doing secretive stuff that affects concerned parties indirectly because they think they won't get noticed.
high fines can discourage companies from doing publicly visible things that affect concerned parties directly because they realize they will absolutely get noticed.
I can't come up with a solid meaning for "as slow". "As fast" seems straightforward; it's a comparison to a value as measured from zero. But "as slow" would seem to need to be a comparison to a value measured from a reference point above the value (like comparing to 60 with a reference value of 100) but of course then the question is "what's the reference point?" So it's not very useful, which makes it not very common, which makes it susceptible to misinterpretation, which makes it even less useful.
it occurs to me (oh why can I not edit!) that I may have misinterpreted the focus of your statement. If you're going with "use of a method other than a taxi is competing with taxis" I agree, and point out that rental car companies and hotel shuttles have been doing so for quite a long time...
he said "ad hoc" taxi service. That's the one where you walk out of a building and wave down a car that happens to be passing by, no apps, no phone calls - the original taxi model, in fact. Uber doesn't do that at all, as far as I'm aware.
I suspect coffee shops will be before nail/hair, which will be before plumbers and electricians. Plumbers/electricians have to do onsite stuff, and no two sites are quite the same. Automating that level of flexibility will take longer than building an auto-mixing espresso bot.
I think he's talking about automated food production (most things outside the produce department have some amount of automation involved; much of the aisle stuff is totally automated after harvest and a lot is automated there too). Have you seen those shows about what kind of factory makes food product X? Frequently the human touch is only for shlepping jugs of sauce and boxing a dozen or two of whatever after they've been wrapped/labelled/bottled.
good question. While there's a lot of them, I'm not sure what the percentage is. I haven't lived in a FCFS parking apartment in 8 or so years, and even at that one I did have a garage, I just used it for storage instead of parking. (If 90% of the residents wanted garages there wouldn't have been enough, though.)
my best guess is that it's a matter of whether the extra time to join the multiple tables is a significant problem. If you're never not joining them, it may be faster to just leave it in 3NF.
The perjury part is only for the assertion that the filer of the DMCA complaint is the owner or is the agent of the owner of a copyright. The assertion that the work being complained about infringes on that copyright is "good faith".
from what I've read the original idea (this was 20+ years ago, mind you) was that child molesters can't help themselves, so keeping them away from temptation (residency restrictions) and giving everyone else enough info to keep temptation away from them (publicized addresses) was a good thing. Then they started piling all the not-predator stuff on. And of course since then the attitude has changed from "they can't help themselves" to "they are responsible for their actions", which undermines the entire purpose of the list, leaving it only a lifetime punishment that the state doesn't have to pay for. But doing away with it would be "soft on crime"...
It's probably not even the biggest thing on his "Kernel Shit Must Change" list; more of a "this came up, so here's my opinion; now I'm gonna do something else". At least, that's how I interpret his email.
But why would you expect to see stuff about war, famine, or the Kardashians on the linux kernel mailing list?
Slashdot Mirror
You seem to expect that high fines would not discourage false DMCA notices, because the filers would expect to get away with it, because they currently get away with it. But they currently get away with it not because it's hard to detect, or hard to identify the perpetrator, or low enough impact that nobody bothers to do anything, but because it's not illegal. If it became illegal, the facts that it would be easy to identify the filer, and the owner of the suppressed material is significantly impacted mean they'd be very likely to get caught.
Certainly, I expect that some would still file false notices, expecting to not get caught. But I think the majority of _current_ false-filers would consider it too risky and stop.
they add a smoky feel
high fines don't discourage humans from doing secretive stuff that affects concerned parties indirectly because they think they won't get noticed.
high fines can discourage companies from doing publicly visible things that affect concerned parties directly because they realize they will absolutely get noticed.
I can't come up with a solid meaning for "as slow". "As fast" seems straightforward; it's a comparison to a value as measured from zero. But "as slow" would seem to need to be a comparison to a value measured from a reference point above the value (like comparing to 60 with a reference value of 100) but of course then the question is "what's the reference point?" So it's not very useful, which makes it not very common, which makes it susceptible to misinterpretation, which makes it even less useful.
You can certainly keep doing it. You may not be able to get paid for it.
so you're saying that if you act like an asshole I'm not allowed to tell you to bug off? Because that's a repercussion.
since he said "lack of mass exodus", you seem to be agreeing.
it occurs to me (oh why can I not edit!) that I may have misinterpreted the focus of your statement. If you're going with "use of a method other than a taxi is competing with taxis" I agree, and point out that rental car companies and hotel shuttles have been doing so for quite a long time...
he said "ad hoc" taxi service. That's the one where you walk out of a building and wave down a car that happens to be passing by, no apps, no phone calls - the original taxi model, in fact. Uber doesn't do that at all, as far as I'm aware.
I suspect coffee shops will be before nail/hair, which will be before plumbers and electricians. Plumbers/electricians have to do onsite stuff, and no two sites are quite the same. Automating that level of flexibility will take longer than building an auto-mixing espresso bot.
I think he's talking about automated food production (most things outside the produce department have some amount of automation involved; much of the aisle stuff is totally automated after harvest and a lot is automated there too). Have you seen those shows about what kind of factory makes food product X? Frequently the human touch is only for shlepping jugs of sauce and boxing a dozen or two of whatever after they've been wrapped/labelled/bottled.
That last sentence appears to be general to all parties this year. *sigh*
good question. While there's a lot of them, I'm not sure what the percentage is. I haven't lived in a FCFS parking apartment in 8 or so years, and even at that one I did have a garage, I just used it for storage instead of parking. (If 90% of the residents wanted garages there wouldn't have been enough, though.)
my best guess is that it's a matter of whether the extra time to join the multiple tables is a significant problem. If you're never not joining them, it may be faster to just leave it in 3NF.
In my experience, "if it's stupid but works it isn't stupid" usually has an implicit assumption that nothing else is working.
I've never heard of a case like that, but I wouldn't be surprised if that worked for someone.
The perjury part is only for the assertion that the filer of the DMCA complaint is the owner or is the agent of the owner of a copyright. The assertion that the work being complained about infringes on that copyright is "good faith".
sounds like you want the developer branch.
from what I've read the original idea (this was 20+ years ago, mind you) was that child molesters can't help themselves, so keeping them away from temptation (residency restrictions) and giving everyone else enough info to keep temptation away from them (publicized addresses) was a good thing. Then they started piling all the not-predator stuff on. And of course since then the attitude has changed from "they can't help themselves" to "they are responsible for their actions", which undermines the entire purpose of the list, leaving it only a lifetime punishment that the state doesn't have to pay for. But doing away with it would be "soft on crime"...
You don't. They do (running off the edge of the road because you thought it was a meter that-a-way is an accident).
I don't have much trouble wearing their glasses over mine, but I don't doubt that some folks do.
since they don't overlap, to get all the content you have to subscribe to both.
you appear to have neglected the "spread over 12 years" part.
It's probably not even the biggest thing on his "Kernel Shit Must Change" list; more of a "this came up, so here's my opinion; now I'm gonna do something else". At least, that's how I interpret his email.
But why would you expect to see stuff about war, famine, or the Kardashians on the linux kernel mailing list?
especially if it lacks comments