What if the gay men outnumbered the straight men in a unit? Possible Rape situation.
There's a possible rape situation in having one or two females in an otherwise male unit. And that happens quite a bit.
They don't bunk male and female members together for the same reasons. You have a bunch of very young men at the height of their sexuality. It's a powderkeg.
Then it follows that, if you don't allow gay males into the military because they might rape a straight male, then we shouldn't allow straight males into the military because they might rape a female.
As for the peter principle, well in war time militaries, peter gets shot and dies. Peter only survies in peacetime militaries.
What do you think it requires. This bit here, introducing para 2-1 seem pretty cut and dry.
2-1. All Army personnel
Operations security is everyone's responsibility. Failure to properly implement OPSEC measures can result in serious
injury or death to our personnel, damage to weapons systems, equipment and facilities, loss of sensitive technologies
and mission failure. OPSEC is a continuous process and an inherent part of military culture and as such, must be fully
integrated into the execution of all Army operations and supporting activities. All Department of the Army (DA)
personnel (active component, reserve component to include U.S. Army Reserve, Army National Guard, and DA
civilians), and DOD contractors will--
g. Consult with their immediate supervisor and their OPSEC Officer for an OPSEC review prior to publishing or posting information in a public forum.
(1) This includes, but is not limited to letters, resumes, articles for publication, electronic mail (e-mail), Web site postings, web log (blog) postings, discussion in Internet information forums, discussion in Internet message boards or
other forms of dissemination or documentation.
You see this with a lot of content management systems. I usually spend the first 30-45 minutes on a new layout by making it xhtml strict. One of the advantages of good CMS is the ability to edit the templates so that you can make this happen; the difference tends to be in the degree of ease. With Movabletype, it's a snap to get the page to validate. With something like PHPBB, it's pure agony. That's my opinion, so YMMV.
I wish developers would take the extra effort to make sure their code is correct and properly uses elements for their intended purposes.
That's interesting. When i loaded the page for the first time and noticed the arrows on the side section header, i immediately thought: "cool, they added collapsible sections". Then i clicked it, and indeed it worked as expected! It is pretty spiffy!
I'm certain anyone who has every used a Mac Finder and/or the Gnome Desktop would make this "arrow" connection as well.
The arrows didn't show up for me the first few times I looked at it. They're appearing now. Much better, IMO. I suspect there was a problem with the image server. The new style looks much better with the images.
You have to click the section headers (don't click the Vendors link).
It doesn't give you a very good indication that there's any sort of functionality hooked into those headers.
TFA states that they got much of the hardware from Reuse. Reuse is a mailing list where people post the locations of junk they spot around campus or get rid of junk they own. Some junk is worthless, other junk is gold.
If you've got computer equipment to get rid of, someone on reuse will take it from you. I once had a claim on an old optical mouse in 15 seconds. I scored a bunch of servos and controller boards on one occasion.
I know creative had mp3 players out before apple. I owned a Nomad IIc and the MuVo slim, before my shuffle, the patent is on the interface of the zen though; which is what I wrote about.
If we are looking at the purely scientific idea of figuring out what the brain is doing, then this could have some real potential.
I think that's the point. We know a lot about when certain things occur, but we don't really know how and we're just starting to learn the progression. Infants absorb information constantly, so observing one for a couple of hours a day might provide milestones in development but provide little evidence of how those milestones are reached. That's what this project is getting at, I believe.
No, I expressed an opinion. If I set the moderation agenda, I wouldn't have to say anything, would I? I'd just cancel the moderation.
There's a limited range of options. The important part is the sign of the value, as that affects the score, and not the text alongside it.
I disagree. An "Insightful" moderation and a "Funny" moderation both carry a +1. They may affect the score in the same fashion, but when I see a +5 funny post I expect to read something that makes me chuckle. When I see a +5 Insightful post, I expect something intelligent. Thus, the text alignside the numeric score is also important.
And while you are correct that/. provides a limited selection of options for categorizing a moderation, I reiterate my opinion that the moderation was overkill.
For those that actually read the article, the link to Flake's research on this is actually good, meatier reading (though not much more meaty). Granted, it's for another company, not Microsoft, but I imagine that Microsoft will try some similar approaches.
Basically, at Flake's company they have a tool that tells the degree of similarity between two programs. I'm not sure of the actual mechanics of this (if it's 1-by-1 instruction comparison, on a functional level, etc), but it enables them to build taxonomies of malware programs. Trees of programs that are variants of eachother, if related; separate trees if not. It somewhat reminds me of stuff in bioinformatics, though my knowledge of that area is extremely weak.
It's neat stuff if you're interested in that sort of thing.
The rest of you all can go back to bashing Microsoft.
What about when a person who upgrades their family computer and wants to be able to watch the movies he purchased and backed up? Is he forced to buy another copy of the movie to watch it because his old copy won't play on his new machine? Why should I pay for something that will simply be unusable in 5 years after I upgrade my computer?
Count me out. I'll just stick with DVDs: the price is the same, without the gimping of the product (region codes aside).
Slashdot Mirror
There's a possible rape situation in having one or two females in an otherwise male unit. And that happens quite a bit.
Then it follows that, if you don't allow gay males into the military because they might rape a straight male, then we shouldn't allow straight males into the military because they might rape a female.
No, Peter is put on Staff.
Couldn't agree more. And I speak from recent experience.
You're right up until "if it's not a good reason, it gets dumped."
What do you think it requires. This bit here, introducing para 2-1 seem pretty cut and dry.
Or, how about this.
BMI is not worthless. BMI is also not the end-all metric for health and welfare.
It's an indicator, a tool. And like any tool it can be misused in the hands of the wrong people.
You see this with a lot of content management systems. I usually spend the first 30-45 minutes on a new layout by making it xhtml strict. One of the advantages of good CMS is the ability to edit the templates so that you can make this happen; the difference tends to be in the degree of ease. With Movabletype, it's a snap to get the page to validate. With something like PHPBB, it's pure agony. That's my opinion, so YMMV.
I wish developers would take the extra effort to make sure their code is correct and properly uses elements for their intended purposes.
TFA states that they got much of the hardware from Reuse. Reuse is a mailing list where people post the locations of junk they spot around campus or get rid of junk they own. Some junk is worthless, other junk is gold.
If you've got computer equipment to get rid of, someone on reuse will take it from you. I once had a claim on an old optical mouse in 15 seconds. I scored a bunch of servos and controller boards on one occasion.
So no, they're not rich, just thrifty.
I know creative had mp3 players out before apple. I owned a Nomad IIc and the MuVo slim, before my shuffle, the patent is on the interface of the zen though; which is what I wrote about.
I think that's the point. We know a lot about when certain things occur, but we don't really know how and we're just starting to learn the progression. Infants absorb information constantly, so observing one for a couple of hours a day might provide milestones in development but provide little evidence of how those milestones are reached. That's what this project is getting at, I believe.
I haven't followed MP3 player chronology very closely. Didn't the iPod come out before the Zen player?
And if this patent was granted last August, why wait until now to sue?
Seems to me that creative is just ticked they got trounced in a market they originally had been doing well in.
NEWS, everybody!
Yes. TV.
Yes. Animated.
We all have our heroes.
Or Mr. Wizard...
No, I expressed an opinion. If I set the moderation agenda, I wouldn't have to say anything, would I? I'd just cancel the moderation.
I disagree. An "Insightful" moderation and a "Funny" moderation both carry a +1. They may affect the score in the same fashion, but when I see a +5 funny post I expect to read something that makes me chuckle. When I see a +5 Insightful post, I expect something intelligent. Thus, the text alignside the numeric score is also important.
And while you are correct that /. provides a limited selection of options for categorizing a moderation, I reiterate my opinion that the moderation was overkill.
You may choose, and have chosen, to disagree.
Or perhaps his sig is not relevant to the discussion, which is what moderaters should be looking at?
At worst, his sig is tactless.
This post is currently moderated as "Flamebait"
/. moderators smoking?
WTH are
For those that actually read the article, the link to Flake's research on this is actually good, meatier reading (though not much more meaty). Granted, it's for another company, not Microsoft, but I imagine that Microsoft will try some similar approaches.
Basically, at Flake's company they have a tool that tells the degree of similarity between two programs. I'm not sure of the actual mechanics of this (if it's 1-by-1 instruction comparison, on a functional level, etc), but it enables them to build taxonomies of malware programs. Trees of programs that are variants of eachother, if related; separate trees if not. It somewhat reminds me of stuff in bioinformatics, though my knowledge of that area is extremely weak.
It's neat stuff if you're interested in that sort of thing.
The rest of you all can go back to bashing Microsoft.
Perhaps you forgot: This is /.
Website of knee-jerk anti-microsoft rants.
He doesn't let pesky facts get in the way of his America bashing. :)
I would amend that to be "yes, if the market will allow us to get away with it."
What about when a person who upgrades their family computer and wants to be able to watch the movies he purchased and backed up? Is he forced to buy another copy of the movie to watch it because his old copy won't play on his new machine? Why should I pay for something that will simply be unusable in 5 years after I upgrade my computer?
Count me out. I'll just stick with DVDs: the price is the same, without the gimping of the product (region codes aside).
You've been modded funny, while it's not a -1 moderation, it's clearly not appropriate for your post. I think it just further proves your point.
/. moderators are mostly able to read, they can not comprehend.
Apparently