Yeah I read that story. I moved to Baltimore and my daughter lives in PG county. I can't get on board with McCarren on this one. If you are following a government official in an unmarked vehicle, noticeably, there is going to be a very negative police response. This is pretty much everywhere. As for her overly extreme recuperation time and rehabilitation, I cant get on that one either. Both of my shoulders have been dislocated numerous times and never has it taken months to heal up.
incorrect, in most states, when you are arrested, you automatically lose the privacy rights. Hell, in many states, they will print your photo with the date you were arrested and the crime as well as location in the paper, online and elsewhere. See: Chattanooga News Free Press.
Yeah... it could be something to do with heightened awareness from the caffeine or something to that tune. I have no idea, but I wonder if they take into account the people that drank regular coffee for long periods of time and have only been on decaf for a short period.
There was an interesting article a year or so ago that showed a correlation between coffee drinking and bowl movements vs water drinking. I will try to find it for citation, but the gist of it was: Due to the diuretic properties of coffee, the coffee drinkers had more regular bowl movements than those who drank water which meant that toxins spent less time in the intestines thus creating a lower likelihood of some intestinal diseases.
They also produced a study last year that indicated that males who drink 2-3 cups of coffee daily had a lower chance of fatal colon cancer than non-coffee drinkers. I guess that it has something to do with the fact that we coffee drinkers tend to shit on a regular basis....
In short term, yes, there is a cost savings that occurs. In long term, you will lose out on quality of your product or support. Most major companies with outsourced development are feeling that pain. The company I work for lost well over 2 million dollars in the last year due to the inadequacy of the offshore development teams we had. Some of the larger tech oriented companies, like HP are slowly moving their important development back to the US because of this. HP just brought around 200 SAP development jobs back to the office a few miles from mine.
Who do you think your first responders are to emergency situations which may include "terrorist" instances? In this day and age, special operations could teach a great deal to law enforcement professionals. One might think this a bad thing, but in reality, it is all about handling a situation, situational awareness and achieving your objective with as little bloodshed and collateral damage as possible. These are things that I would like for cops to have.
Definitely can be, but you have to look at the attorneys involved, the judge and the evidence. I have seen judges toss 1st person testimony as hearsay due to no corroborating evidence while I have seen some judges accept hearsay with no corroboration. It can really depend on the person sitting the bench.
I've sat too many times in a court room and have seen too many witness testimonies ruled out as hearsay. (And yes, I blame android spellcheck for here-say). I get arrested for a crime. During the investigation, the detectives interview people in a bar that I frequent. One person, tells the investigators that he overheard me tell someone I did it, or that I even told him directly. Sane lawyers will have that testimony tossed as hearsay due to not having any form of corroboration or evidence. With that being said, many times hearsay is accepted as evidence in a crime if it comes from respected sources i.e. priests, doctors etc.
You should read more closely. The 11,667 assessments were done between December of 2008 and March of 2009. 3 months. During this time, we did not have major events taking place such as OWS.
And any sane lawyer in the world can have that testimony thrown out as here-say without a physical proof that the witness was indeed at the location and party to the conversation and he can only speak specifically on the portions of the conversation that he input.
Yes, but under those rules, Twitter would only be required to show the court documentation pertaining to when he tweeted and to what parties the tweets may have been read by, not the actual content of the tweets which is what they want. For that, a warrant is needed for twitter to release 3rd party information.
They have to show evidence of probable cause in order to get a warrant, otherwise it is just a fishing expedition and Twitter is perfectly in their right to do what they are doing.
My tweets are private if I say my tweets are private. If I do not allow non-friends to see them, it's the same as if I were having a private conversation with a friend of mine inside of my house.
You're naive if you think the OWS protesters do not have FBI files. Shit, the FBI has files on a HUGE portion of the population. Most just don't even know it.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah I read that story. I moved to Baltimore and my daughter lives in PG county. I can't get on board with McCarren on this one. If you are following a government official in an unmarked vehicle, noticeably, there is going to be a very negative police response. This is pretty much everywhere. As for her overly extreme recuperation time and rehabilitation, I cant get on that one either. Both of my shoulders have been dislocated numerous times and never has it taken months to heal up.
incorrect, in most states, when you are arrested, you automatically lose the privacy rights. Hell, in many states, they will print your photo with the date you were arrested and the crime as well as location in the paper, online and elsewhere. See: Chattanooga News Free Press.
Yeah... it could be something to do with heightened awareness from the caffeine or something to that tune. I have no idea, but I wonder if they take into account the people that drank regular coffee for long periods of time and have only been on decaf for a short period.
Caffeine is a diuretic, thus, tea with caffeine would also work.
*bowel..... spellcheck sucks.
There was an interesting article a year or so ago that showed a correlation between coffee drinking and bowl movements vs water drinking. I will try to find it for citation, but the gist of it was: Due to the diuretic properties of coffee, the coffee drinkers had more regular bowl movements than those who drank water which meant that toxins spent less time in the intestines thus creating a lower likelihood of some intestinal diseases.
pretty sure he is referring to Starbucks or Caribu or some other such nonsense. I don't buy the cheap stuff, but I get roughly 64 cups for about $10.
They also produced a study last year that indicated that males who drink 2-3 cups of coffee daily had a lower chance of fatal colon cancer than non-coffee drinkers. I guess that it has something to do with the fact that we coffee drinkers tend to shit on a regular basis....
In short term, yes, there is a cost savings that occurs. In long term, you will lose out on quality of your product or support. Most major companies with outsourced development are feeling that pain. The company I work for lost well over 2 million dollars in the last year due to the inadequacy of the offshore development teams we had. Some of the larger tech oriented companies, like HP are slowly moving their important development back to the US because of this. HP just brought around 200 SAP development jobs back to the office a few miles from mine.
it really came off more as a rant than anything else...
How much coke did you snort before you wrote that post?
no because the lawyer maintains those documents as the creator of those documents unless they were obtained from someone.
Employing more Indian/Phillipino/Mexican/Chinese coders than Americans.
My eve-online folder is 31 gigs but also contains roughly 7 years of screenshots lol.
40 minutes of your parents talking to your baby daughter every night? I can't imagine that. Is your last name Focker?
Who do you think your first responders are to emergency situations which may include "terrorist" instances? In this day and age, special operations could teach a great deal to law enforcement professionals. One might think this a bad thing, but in reality, it is all about handling a situation, situational awareness and achieving your objective with as little bloodshed and collateral damage as possible. These are things that I would like for cops to have.
In some circumstances, that would almost be a better option.
Definitely can be, but you have to look at the attorneys involved, the judge and the evidence. I have seen judges toss 1st person testimony as hearsay due to no corroborating evidence while I have seen some judges accept hearsay with no corroboration. It can really depend on the person sitting the bench.
I've sat too many times in a court room and have seen too many witness testimonies ruled out as hearsay. (And yes, I blame android spellcheck for here-say). I get arrested for a crime. During the investigation, the detectives interview people in a bar that I frequent. One person, tells the investigators that he overheard me tell someone I did it, or that I even told him directly. Sane lawyers will have that testimony tossed as hearsay due to not having any form of corroboration or evidence. With that being said, many times hearsay is accepted as evidence in a crime if it comes from respected sources i.e. priests, doctors etc.
You should read more closely. The 11,667 assessments were done between December of 2008 and March of 2009. 3 months. During this time, we did not have major events taking place such as OWS.
And any sane lawyer in the world can have that testimony thrown out as here-say without a physical proof that the witness was indeed at the location and party to the conversation and he can only speak specifically on the portions of the conversation that he input.
Yes, but under those rules, Twitter would only be required to show the court documentation pertaining to when he tweeted and to what parties the tweets may have been read by, not the actual content of the tweets which is what they want. For that, a warrant is needed for twitter to release 3rd party information.
They have to show evidence of probable cause in order to get a warrant, otherwise it is just a fishing expedition and Twitter is perfectly in their right to do what they are doing.
My tweets are private if I say my tweets are private. If I do not allow non-friends to see them, it's the same as if I were having a private conversation with a friend of mine inside of my house.
You're naive if you think the OWS protesters do not have FBI files. Shit, the FBI has files on a HUGE portion of the population. Most just don't even know it.