Penalties are established by law for the civilian world, they are established by the UCMJ for the military.
The burden of proof is on the prosecution in both instances, however, that which constitutes proof varies between the two.
Minimum sentencing guidelines aside, the military generally has harsher penalties for crimes than the civilian world. See rape: UCMJ Article 120
Any person subject to this chapter who commits an act of sexual intercourse with a female not his wife, by force and without consent, is guilty of rape and shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
Different penalties depending on the court being charged in. As well as different requirements for a conviction between a civilian court an a military court.
I perused your site and I gave it actual intellectual consideration, that is until nearly every reference to scientific works that I read was taken out of context. I have no problems with listening to actual well thought out arguments, based in facts, of creation vs evolution. However, when the evidence is taken out of context and misconstrued, it makes it difficult to take it seriously.
You sir, couldn't be any more wrong. Many of us, but yes there are some militants out there, who are atheists, are generally more accepting of other's belief systems than those who believe in a deific religion. The only people that I come across who are anywhere near as accepting are jewish, taoist, buddhist, hindu, nature based religions etc. Generally, I find most intolerance is held by christians and muslims. We do not "worship" science, but we do accept that in many instances, it is fact, not fiction. When proof of something is held before us, we do not stick our fingers in our ears and chant "I can't hear you" repeatedly because it might disagree with my personal belief system.
If those companies were actually smart, they would be the ones funding the project for a piece of the backend. It would be win-win for them as they get all the overflow from people not able to take the tube, as well as $$ from the people that are. This would also take less money from the government.
Because it doesn't matter who you vote for in general. The people that run are chosen for you by a select few. And if someone slips in there that they don't want, they'll just drop millions on attack ads and the newcomer will just go away. Also, have you actually seen our media in the last decade?
#1 because it is your right
#2 because there is always a report, and your information will go into it.
#3 because they have no legal right to stop and question someone that is not suspected of committing a crime.
#4 because any real officer worth his salt will actually commend you for NOT speaking to them. ( I have been several times )
#5 because ID checks are faulty.. all.. the... time... just ask any of the thousands of people that get arrested for other's warrants.
#6 because ANY information you give to the police can be used against you. (You show your ID, oh you live on the street where the crime was committed, meanwhile a neighbor, when asked, says they think they saw you or someone resembling you leaving the scene of the crime.)
Here's an example, you decline to buy item X from company Y, instead you buy it from company Z because they offer it in a format/ on a device/in a manner you prefer. This is how you are dictating to company Y that you want their product in a different manner. With regards to movies and the like, the only way to make that happen is to wait for it to hit iTunes, netflix, hulu or on demand (if you want to wait 6+ months to see something) otherwise, you download that shit.
you, as the consumer, should be and are. If you choose not to buy because of their methods of dissemination, then you are dictating to them how to sell their product.
Though I do not agree with law enforcement being able to access everyone's information for identification purposes, I do think that this is not very different from being pulled in for a line up other than the fact that with a line up, you are at least aware of what's happening.
Slashdot Mirror
The burden of proof is on the prosecution in both instances, however, that which constitutes proof varies between the two.
Minimum sentencing guidelines aside, the military generally has harsher penalties for crimes than the civilian world. See rape: UCMJ Article 120
Any person subject to this chapter who commits an act of sexual intercourse with a female not his wife, by force and without consent, is guilty of rape and shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
Different penalties depending on the court being charged in. As well as different requirements for a conviction between a civilian court an a military court.
no, snowden is a civilian and thus not subject to the UCMJ.
or join you.
I perused your site and I gave it actual intellectual consideration, that is until nearly every reference to scientific works that I read was taken out of context. I have no problems with listening to actual well thought out arguments, based in facts, of creation vs evolution. However, when the evidence is taken out of context and misconstrued, it makes it difficult to take it seriously.
There is a bit of a difference between Israeli and Americanized Jewish people.
Yet you pick 9 of the 100+ recipients.
You sir, couldn't be any more wrong. Many of us, but yes there are some militants out there, who are atheists, are generally more accepting of other's belief systems than those who believe in a deific religion. The only people that I come across who are anywhere near as accepting are jewish, taoist, buddhist, hindu, nature based religions etc. Generally, I find most intolerance is held by christians and muslims. We do not "worship" science, but we do accept that in many instances, it is fact, not fiction. When proof of something is held before us, we do not stick our fingers in our ears and chant "I can't hear you" repeatedly because it might disagree with my personal belief system.
If those companies were actually smart, they would be the ones funding the project for a piece of the backend. It would be win-win for them as they get all the overflow from people not able to take the tube, as well as $$ from the people that are. This would also take less money from the government.
Damn you slashdot for removing my THORNS!!
Ð, ð. ,
ey, at. is, us are more accurate than they, that, this, thus
Yeah agreed. All I can say is, that one instance, there were millions added to the financials cause the previous guy mucked it up.
Misplaced decimals in financials calculations are a bigger fear to have
Dont forget MORE wars over arable land, resources etc.
only if you completely discount the building of a nuclear plant. It takes thousands of hours of carbon emissions in construction.
You'd want to replace the original screws if you have to actually send it back to apple.
Because it doesn't matter who you vote for in general. The people that run are chosen for you by a select few. And if someone slips in there that they don't want, they'll just drop millions on attack ads and the newcomer will just go away. Also, have you actually seen our media in the last decade?
You're first and only statement when questioned should be "I wish to speak with my legal counsel".
That may be true, I did not differentiate between witness and defendant.
#2 because there is always a report, and your information will go into it.
#3 because they have no legal right to stop and question someone that is not suspected of committing a crime.
#4 because any real officer worth his salt will actually commend you for NOT speaking to them. ( I have been several times )
#5 because ID checks are faulty.. all.. the... time... just ask any of the thousands of people that get arrested for other's warrants. #6 because ANY information you give to the police can be used against you. (You show your ID, oh you live on the street where the crime was committed, meanwhile a neighbor, when asked, says they think they saw you or someone resembling you leaving the scene of the crime.)
If you do not believe any of these, please watch this video: Why you do not talk to the police
Incorrect, you are allowed to answer some questions while taking the 5th on others. You see this in congressional hearings all the time.
Here's an example, you decline to buy item X from company Y, instead you buy it from company Z because they offer it in a format/ on a device/in a manner you prefer. This is how you are dictating to company Y that you want their product in a different manner. With regards to movies and the like, the only way to make that happen is to wait for it to hit iTunes, netflix, hulu or on demand (if you want to wait 6+ months to see something) otherwise, you download that shit.
In my area, there are maybe 2-3 houses in total using comcast for internet, it's all verizon fios or dsl.
you, as the consumer, should be and are. If you choose not to buy because of their methods of dissemination, then you are dictating to them how to sell their product.
Though I do not agree with law enforcement being able to access everyone's information for identification purposes, I do think that this is not very different from being pulled in for a line up other than the fact that with a line up, you are at least aware of what's happening.