The problem is, that the jury admitted to skipping entire parts of the case and just awarding apple money. Not just that, but some features that apple has patented were not even apple innovations.
So whether Samsung did copy or not, Apple was awarded money for things it copied.
It isn't the fact that people are pro Samsung or pro Apple, it is that Apple was awarded a giant sum of money due to a broken system and an uneducated jury when it comes to patents.
Slashdot Mirror
Tell that to the people who made the 2-tonne black monstrosity in the loading bay down the hall.
Dude don't be so racist
The problem is, that the jury admitted to skipping entire parts of the case and just awarding apple money. Not just that, but some features that apple has patented were not even apple innovations. So whether Samsung did copy or not, Apple was awarded money for things it copied. It isn't the fact that people are pro Samsung or pro Apple, it is that Apple was awarded a giant sum of money due to a broken system and an uneducated jury when it comes to patents.
still doesn't make sense... Eating its own dog food, means that it eats its on product... im sure if a dog made dog food they would eat it...
I think it will be interesting to see how the governments of the world start to evolve around this new threat.