Hey now, don't try to go too far over my head, there chief. I'm just too pretty to be able to catch that rapier wit of yours.
Plus, you're a tad too defensive in your last statement. It makes you seem ass-holier-than-thou.
That's a rather blanket statement, don't you think? What's to say that the pretty girl you see walking past you on the street isn't on her way home from work only to network the computers in her house for fun? One of my best friends meets and exceeds the qualifications for being a geekess and is extremely beautiful as well. Don't stereotype or pigeonhole people of a certain look or preconception of how they should look or act.
And on what undoubtedly empirical observations do you base this claim? Surely you must have a reason for it because you seem like you have a rational mind. So tell us all what your logic for this is. Unless you have none and are just condemning something that you don't understand.
The way I see it you can do one of three things, other than being angry at a TOPIC THAT CAN BE FILTERED: shut the hell up and filter, shut the hell up and deal with the fact that some people like things that you don't OR shut the hell up and go away.
He's fourth in line for the presidency, the Speaker of the House is third in line for the presidency. Strom, as the Senate President pro tempore, is fourth after the pres, vice pres, and the Speaker of the House.
Then why don't you watch one of the many animé that's tentacle-free, such as Akazukin Cha Cha. It's merely cute with no sex whatsoever.....and get your mind out of the gutter of your outdated paradigm.
I don't suppose that you have any sort of evidence to support this undoubtedly well-researched claim of yours? If you do, I would be very interested in finding out that I'm a child-molester.....and a dork to boot.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey now, don't try to go too far over my head, there chief. I'm just too pretty to be able to catch that rapier wit of yours.
Plus, you're a tad too defensive in your last statement. It makes you seem ass-holier-than-thou.
That's a rather blanket statement, don't you think? What's to say that the pretty girl you see walking past you on the street isn't on her way home from work only to network the computers in her house for fun? One of my best friends meets and exceeds the qualifications for being a geekess and is extremely beautiful as well. Don't stereotype or pigeonhole people of a certain look or preconception of how they should look or act.
And on what undoubtedly empirical observations do you base this claim? Surely you must have a reason for it because you seem like you have a rational mind. So tell us all what your logic for this is. Unless you have none and are just condemning something that you don't understand.
The way I see it you can do one of three things, other than being angry at a TOPIC THAT CAN BE FILTERED: shut the hell up and filter, shut the hell up and deal with the fact that some people like things that you don't OR shut the hell up and go away.
No, you're not grasping at straws in an arguement you're destined to lose, I promise you aren't.
You haven't been reading this thread at all, have you?
He's fourth in line for the presidency, the Speaker of the House is third in line for the presidency. Strom, as the Senate President pro tempore, is fourth after the pres, vice pres, and the Speaker of the House.
Then why don't you watch one of the many animé that's tentacle-free, such as Akazukin Cha Cha. It's merely cute with no sex whatsoever.....and get your mind out of the gutter of your outdated paradigm.
I don't suppose that you have any sort of evidence to support this undoubtedly well-researched claim of yours? If you do, I would be very interested in finding out that I'm a child-molester.....and a dork to boot.