Slashdot Mirror


User: jmottram08

jmottram08's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
290
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 290

  1. Re:Proving Themselves Shortsighted on Long Now Clock Advances With Bezos Cash · · Score: 1

    There were people like you nay-saying the pyramids as well.

  2. Re:Proving Themselves Shortsighted on Long Now Clock Advances With Bezos Cash · · Score: 1

    RTFA. The clock has a astrological display. If in 10,000 years people cant look at a pendulum and imply passage of time that is their problem. The clock makers shouldn't give up because of the -possibility- that people wont understand it years from now.

  3. Re:it won't last that long because of humans on Long Now Clock Advances With Bezos Cash · · Score: 1

    RTFA. The location, materials, structure and building all take into account these facts. Will it actually last that long? who knows, but you arent the first person to have that thought, and if you read a little more you would realize that.

  4. Re:Archeologic interpretation on Long Now Clock Advances With Bezos Cash · · Score: 1
    Uhh. . . look at the seven wonders of the world and most all have a -well- defined purpose.

    Stonehenge and easter island are some of the more obscure artifacts in the world, but its pretty well accepted that stonehenge was a somewhat mystic burial site, although its use changed over its long history several times.

  5. Re:Cool idea, but... on Long Now Clock Advances With Bezos Cash · · Score: 3

    The idea is to build a clock that lasts that long, not pay for repairs and maintenance to run a clock for 10.000 years. RTFA

  6. Re:Our healthcare is f*cked. on Two More Google Software Dogs Go To Heaven · · Score: 2

    There is NO way that a simple doctor visit cost over 700. There must have been tests involved, or you are the stupidest consumer in the world to pay that much for a routine doctor visit.

  7. Re:"not air conditioning the gym from 9pm-3am" on Two More Google Software Dogs Go To Heaven · · Score: 1
    . . . . so during the day when its 90, you cool it to 85, as opposed to cooling it to 70? Your post is retarded.

    What you meant to say is that Cooling it slowly for 2 hours may be more efficient that quickly for 1, but you failed to even read the summary where it states they resume cooling it at 3, to meet a 7ish deadline when students arrive. If the air cant cool a space in 4 hours, at night, then it will have huge problems maintaining a decent temp during the day.

  8. Re:Because it doesn't. on Two More Google Software Dogs Go To Heaven · · Score: 1, Informative
    This is completely false. Houses were built this way in the early 80s, but it was RAPIDLY found that this led to problems and ALL modern construction for the last 20 years has been for "breathable" buildings.

    Really. Parent is 100% wrong

  9. Re:Wait... wut? on LulzSec Teams With Anonymous, In Operation AntiSec · · Score: 1
    Banks are at best semi-public. Yeah, your local small bank is more private than public, but at this point the big boys are so closely tied to the govt than something like Walmart is.

    Yeah, i agree that banks are questionable if you want government targets, but so are the government contractors they have gone after in the past.

  10. Re:Wait... wut? on LulzSec Teams With Anonymous, In Operation AntiSec · · Score: 1

    I think they swallowed the whole "The Fed is run by the government" bit. . . which is more true than not.

  11. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1
    Its not cherry picking if i compare the politically powerful of yesterday to today. Actually read the letters the original presidents wrote, then read the ghostwritten books current presidents put out to cash in.

    Yes, there were dumb slobs back then as well as today. Relative percentages are arguable, but in modern times its unarguable that the percentage is going up, at least those in public schools.

    Thats not the point though, just look at the people writing our laws.

  12. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percent_of_people_read_books_in_the_US

    If Jenkins is to be trusted. Is is shocking to the point of disbelief? Yeah, probably. But then again, people on slashdot are smart (cant believe i just said that) and probably need new info more than most professions, not even talking about jobs.

  13. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Important people used to read, and it made them better. As in people in power. Look at the founding fathers debates and what was referenced and what wasnt. Reading Herodotus is inherently better than harlequin romances, yes.

  14. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    114$.

  15. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Oh please, the "average" person doesn't read or have a book collection today.

  16. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1
    You can still buy film in any walmart. . . . any serious photographer still uses it. And yes, i do mean ANY.

    The difference in your examples is that the replacment technology (ballpoint, gell, CD, digital) was in most cases better and mare reliable. Once I switched from VHS to DVD, from the first DVD on i knew it was better. I have a Kindle and love it for its uses, but its not a 100% replacement for books, i saw that on day 1. Until e-books are good far large format, high rez color with no distortion, our books are safe.

  17. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Why would it decay? acid free paper is rated for at least 500 years, not like the books you see from the 70s that are already yellowing.

  18. Re:New Books Maybe Old Books Never on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Do you have any fountain pens?

  19. Re:Better use inert gas on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1
    Yawn. Most books, and all "real" publishers use acid-free paper. Life time? 500-1000 years. Back in the 60s they used acidic paper, and we all see the results.

    Wiki it if you havent ever looked into it, modern books (even cheap ones) will last a LONG time.

  20. Re:No way. on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Eh, i am still secure that if my house burns / blows / quakes? down my e-book collection is secure off site. I am also reasonably confident that if we get te the point of no electricity for more than a month i wont be that interested in the fiction on my kindle.

  21. Re:danger, danger will robinson! on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1

    Funny, my electric only file sitting on my computer is about as hard to rewrite as a book sitting here. Think Books are hard to re write history in? lolololloloooololololool

  22. Re:You can actually own paper books on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 1
    Removing a book off my Kindle is just as hard as removing a physical copy. Harder actually, electronic files are easier to hide.

    "They already did remove them" you whine in a childish voice, to which respond, who keeps their radio on all the time? it kills battery. My radio has been on ONCE in 2 years, to update software only.

  23. Re:How long does he think those books will last? on The End of Paper Books · · Score: 2

    the page will turn to dust. . . . common phrase form when acid paper was used. Today? not so much.

  24. Re:Huh? on Weather Satellites Lose Funding · · Score: 1

    Thats safest for the mother, not the infant.

  25. Re:Cause of shortfall? on Weather Satellites Lose Funding · · Score: 1

    So a gasoline tax is now income tax? cool.