sorry to have to break it to you, but there is an alliance devoted to defaming me. they stoop so low as to register users sharing my given name... such as "MichaelKristopeit 16" and "Mikey Kristopeity"... they post racial hatred in my name. they pool moderation points and down-mod all of my comments as "troll" or "off topic".
i'm glad some individuals like you still exist... but as i'm implying, and you're understanding, there are high power organizations that exist that refuse to acknowledge very obvious things... soon after they begin acting to silence those who would publicly acknowledge and broadcast such things.
their infrastructure requires them to rely on people they do not trust. 2 days worth of submissions would not be lost if they did in fact "keep backups".
wow, legislators in court. i'm sure they're concerned.
cell service is possible using NO conventional towers, so you've obviously given this NO thought. anyone claiming it's not possible simply doesn't want to invest in numerous smaller repeaters.
you are an ignorant hypocrite, scared to post your real name and address and take responsibility for the ideas you spread. claiming that calling someone an idiot is pointless, and then doing just that. you waste your time because it is worthless.
ur mum's face really are incapable of carrying on an adult converstaion.
why are you questioning yourself, pee hook? is it because you're starting to believe that you really might be an idiot?
here is how adult conversations work: someone provides facts, someone else provides more facts. you have NEVER provided any facts. you simply whine like a retarded child.
tell me one thing i've said that isn't 100% factual. bravo on taking a stance like an adult and not using childish prepositions... perhaps your mother was a whore and you are a whore's baby perhaps maybe perhaps. adults don't talk about how to have discussions, they just have them. if you can't handle that, maybe you should stop growing AND living.
what knowledge is there to have? are you denying that flash consumes more resources to run (CPU/battery) and has higher latency and response time than a natively coded app?
that is the only thing i'm commenting on, and my knowledge is complete, and obviously so.
apple respects their customers more than to offer them a watered down experience in the same way high end audio equipment manufactures would not sell a product with a gimmicky feature that added noise to the signal. flash is for lazy developers. i am a user.
the entire point is that the user experience for an application on a battery powered device is better without flash.... or do you think less responsive, more latency, lower battery life are desirable qualities?
it's relevant because if flash isn't NECESSARY, then it's just as ill equipped to do a job optimally as you are.
look at windows... the root cause of most problems is the requirement to keep legacy software supported...
What does that have to do with interpreted code?
are you serious? how do you think the old dynamically linked libraries are updated to run on a vastly different modern multiuser operating system?
even briefs isn't about interpreted code... i never said the issue was with interpreted code. apple never said anything... let alone this being about interpreted code.... the REAL question is why are YOU talking about interpreted code? the problems apple is taking a stand against stem from unnecessary emulation and virtualization layers that degrade latency and mask application thread information from the operating system, that could be used to optimize the user experience.
so it's illegal for chilean ISP's to not replace perfectly functional routers and switches with exorbitantly over-priced newer models with lower latency? i doubt it... so it's already arbitrary which locations and which packets will end up going through which routers. so suddenly the routes to some specific server include 10 hops on naturally high latency routers. what are you going to argue? de facto delay?
i find it telling that the stated purpose of the company behind the briefs product is: "to give [our] users the best experience possible."
the thing is, the "user" to briefs is someone with an application idea drawn on napkins who wants to release a prototype application "without expensive development". to apple the user is the REAL user... the user of the application created by the user of briefs prototyping tool, and to apple, that user is not getting the best experience possible... they are getting a translation.
imagine you are a company that could benefit by making a high profile apple product look slow and buggy and prone to crashing... you release an innocent enough looking "prototyping" tool... it doesn't make applications as optimized as one's with "expensive development", or using the free native development environment, but it's dumbed down and simpler, and hey, it's just a prototype and it works... the translation isn't optimized at all, but all the buttons will do what you tell them to do... now these prototypes are going to be seen by people and the hardware will be judged by the responsiveness of the software.
apple has taken a firm and understandable stance: THIS IS HOW YOU MAKE SOFTWARE FOR THIS DEVICE. NO EXCEPTIONS. *cough* except javascript.
interpreting code is the beginning of another platform layer. look at windows... the root cause of most problems is the requirement to keep legacy software supported... even if the software relies on old system buggish quirks that become protected "features". the card game you bought on cd for windows 95 will probably still work on windows 7. that is perfectly fine, but causes exponential bloat over time that wreaks havoc on latency... when your product is intended for multimedia conversation, protecting latency is important. taking a preemptive stand to protect the user experience is something apple believes is noble... because you're questioning the motivation behind such actions, i'm assuming you're the type that would also be complaining if that old card game didn't still work...
emulation and virtualization platform layers are NEVER the optimal platform for a single system application relative to latency.
Slashdot Mirror
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
ur mum's face need an English lesson and some anti-psychotics.
i'm glad some individuals like you still exist... but as i'm implying, and you're understanding, there are high power organizations that exist that refuse to acknowledge very obvious things... soon after they begin acting to silence those who would publicly acknowledge and broadcast such things.
slashdot = stagnated
their infrastructure requires them to rely on people they do not trust. 2 days worth of submissions would not be lost if they did in fact "keep backups".
cell service is possible using NO conventional towers, so you've obviously given this NO thought. anyone claiming it's not possible simply doesn't want to invest in numerous smaller repeaters.
ur mum's face is an asshole somewhere else
i am actually here making statements about ending the lives of cowards.
This is only true if your desktop firewall actually filters out something that the server-based solutions do not.
you mean like network traffic from compromised machines on the local network behind the firewall?
you are NOTHING.
ur mum's face is bluntly
what about man's requirement to remove himself from the market for time to sleep? THE MARKET CAN NOT WAIT FOR ONE MAN.
why are you questioning yourself, pee hook? is it because you're starting to believe that you really might be an idiot?
here is how adult conversations work: someone provides facts, someone else provides more facts. you have NEVER provided any facts. you simply whine like a retarded child.
you are NOTHING.
straighten your dick, pee hook.
ur mum's face is not smart
you get NOTHING.
once again you are wrong. you're an idiot, pee hook. straighten that dick out.
you're an idiot.
tell me one thing i've said that isn't 100% factual. bravo on taking a stance like an adult and not using childish prepositions... perhaps your mother was a whore and you are a whore's baby perhaps maybe perhaps. adults don't talk about how to have discussions, they just have them. if you can't handle that, maybe you should stop growing AND living.
you are NOTHING
that is the only thing i'm commenting on, and my knowledge is complete, and obviously so.
apple respects their customers more than to offer them a watered down experience in the same way high end audio equipment manufactures would not sell a product with a gimmicky feature that added noise to the signal. flash is for lazy developers. i am a user.
YOU'RE NOT EVEN HERE.
you are NOTHING.
go fuck yourself.
it's relevant because if flash isn't NECESSARY, then it's just as ill equipped to do a job optimally as you are.
look at windows... the root cause of most problems is the requirement to keep legacy software supported...
What does that have to do with interpreted code?
are you serious? how do you think the old dynamically linked libraries are updated to run on a vastly different modern multiuser operating system?
even briefs isn't about interpreted code... i never said the issue was with interpreted code. apple never said anything... let alone this being about interpreted code.... the REAL question is why are YOU talking about interpreted code? the problems apple is taking a stand against stem from unnecessary emulation and virtualization layers that degrade latency and mask application thread information from the operating system, that could be used to optimize the user experience.
you "should be" bitter beacuse you're an idiot.
slashdot mod: "Insightful."
*sigh*
the thing is, the "user" to briefs is someone with an application idea drawn on napkins who wants to release a prototype application "without expensive development". to apple the user is the REAL user... the user of the application created by the user of briefs prototyping tool, and to apple, that user is not getting the best experience possible... they are getting a translation.
imagine you are a company that could benefit by making a high profile apple product look slow and buggy and prone to crashing... you release an innocent enough looking "prototyping" tool... it doesn't make applications as optimized as one's with "expensive development", or using the free native development environment, but it's dumbed down and simpler, and hey, it's just a prototype and it works... the translation isn't optimized at all, but all the buttons will do what you tell them to do... now these prototypes are going to be seen by people and the hardware will be judged by the responsiveness of the software.
apple has taken a firm and understandable stance: THIS IS HOW YOU MAKE SOFTWARE FOR THIS DEVICE. NO EXCEPTIONS. *cough* except javascript.
emulation and virtualization platform layers are NEVER the optimal platform for a single system application relative to latency.
you're an idiot.