i support this, i got this mania for making my system faster and reduce memory footprint, right now when i start my desktop KDE 4.5 linux on a radeon HD card, thw whole system is using 169 Mb of ram, consider this is a 64 bit system (so use a little bit more ram) and a quadcore.
i would say that those who complaint about kde (and gnome) beeing bloated and slow doesn't know how to configurate a system:)
i'm no quite sure about that, logic is only a small part of math, certainly math can work even without the bivalent aristotelic logic search fuzzy logic for that,
also if you have read some book of physics, physics search for a base, something to build upon, math is used like a lenguage to that purpouse.
to aclare this dicotomy let me tell one the phrases of my Teachers.
"if the universe collapse, and it regenerate again, the laws of mathematics are the same?, probably no because math is a purely human invention, instead physics search for a principle that can be valid to this new universe too"
Slashdot Mirror
i support this, i got this mania for making my system faster and reduce memory footprint, right now when i start my desktop KDE 4.5 linux on a radeon HD card, thw whole system is using 169 Mb of ram, consider this is a 64 bit system (so use a little bit more ram) and a quadcore. i would say that those who complaint about kde (and gnome) beeing bloated and slow doesn't know how to configurate a system :)
i'm no quite sure about that, logic is only a small part of math, certainly math can work even without the bivalent aristotelic logic search fuzzy logic for that, also if you have read some book of physics, physics search for a base, something to build upon, math is used like a lenguage to that purpouse. to aclare this dicotomy let me tell one the phrases of my Teachers. "if the universe collapse, and it regenerate again, the laws of mathematics are the same?, probably no because math is a purely human invention, instead physics search for a principle that can be valid to this new universe too"
how the universe is turing complete? you suppose that, you cant know it certainly
i lold