In elementary school, I did a science experiment involving taste. I made 100 mini-muffins, divided into combinations of artificial flavors and colors. For example, the red muffins might be blueberry flavor and the yellow muffins might be chocolate (or whatever). I asked people to eat them and tell me what flavor they tasted. I had dozens of test subjects and they ALL guessed the wrong, "obvious" flavor (red = cherry, blue = blueberry) except my friend Michael. kids are st00pid.
Your solution sounds a lot like the same solution I already proposed:
me: And what about satellite latency? The random number stream must use sequence numbers because I doubt the sender and receiver can syncrhonize their CPU clocks to run at exactly the same 10 million reads per second rate!
you: simple to solve, include a second syncronization number (which are sequential) with each random number sent.
the start code itself is vulnerable. With quantum cracking, even a 128-bit key may fall within moments, in which case the resulting datastream will be insecure. (This is the 'weakest link' approach, as the whole system relies on the impracticality of decrypting a conventional crypto system in a given timeframe and is therefore not 'impenetrable')
How are the sender and receiver supposed to synchronize if the satellite is sending 10 million random numbers per second? The sender must wait as the receiver needs time to receive the start message. The sender can't start its OTP if the receiver is not perfectly sync'd.
And what about satellite latency? The random number stream must use sequence numbers because I doubt the sender and receiver can syncrhonize their CPU clocks to run at exactly the same 10 million reads per second rate!
The cracker in the middle knows to start recording the satellite's number stream when he first sees the sender's start message. He knows to stop recording the number stream when the sender's a message FIN (or whatever).
As much as I like to see people putting more energy into the exploration and exploitation of space, doesn't California have a lot of infrastructure to work toward building up before worrying about the cosmos? They've just had an earthquake that killed thousands and thousands of people. How many of those people could have been saved by importing American building standards and restrictions and adding more support to the current buildings?
It just seems that California has constant problems with nature as well as their difficulty in even maintaining basic power for their population makes me wary that they may best be spending their money elsewhere.
I, just an average Joe with no work experience in the graphics industry and only minimal hobbiest experience, can design and write an application for in one eventing is patentable.
Do I proceed with my business plans, and explain to the court that doing something with a computer in the same way that it is done in real life is not novel when the lawsuit comes in?
You are creating a business with such a low barrier to entry that you wrote the software in one evening.
You linked to this month's most requested site uptimes. That is not the same longest uptimes overall. Please see the following link for Netcraft's longest uptime chart:
I think Pair Programming is probably one of the most unique and promising XP ideas. When someone else is watching you type, you must convince them the code works, makes sense, and isn't hacky. The sum of both developers programming and product knowledge makes the combined solution even better. Unfortunately, I doubt many employers would be willing to hire two developers to "do the work of one person". Plus not everyone can deal with the close watch of Pair Programming, though these people are probably not great team players for non-XP shops.
I can't help but think that it would be better code if it noted the flaws in the standard routines and either avoided them or wrapped them instead of replacing them outright.
Or perhaps he should report the supposed bugs to so they can be fixed for everyone else.
I used to work at Microsoft as a tester for Windows NT 5 (pre Windows 2000). I had read the "required reading" of "Showstopper" and was curious to see Cutler's code. I found his assembly code for NT spinlocks and it was highly commented and very elegant.
When I was at school at the University of Washington, one my profs worked with Cutler at DEC. He said Cutler would print out his code into two piles: code and tests. My prof said the test code pile was 3x taller than the shipping code. Cutler is a huge stickler for testing your own damn code!;)
Frank Lloyd Wright are completely static, unadaptable to their inhabitants' needs. When his clients often complained that their roofs leaked, Wright would tell them "that's how you know it's a roof" and refused to fix it. Wright homes are well known for their leaky roofs. He built the building HE wanted, regardless of the client's wishes.
Perl and Linux, however, are very flexible organisms, grown incrementally and organically to meet precisely their users' needs. Exactly the opposite of Wright's design mentality.
This is a really good point. If your program depends on third-party libraries, then you must test the libraries too. If you just assume they are perfect, you are asking for trouble. Perhaps your new code is reusing the old library in a way or context unexpected by the library's designer.
Of course, you don't really need to go a write a complete test suite for every library you use. That's tough, especially for closed source libraries. Since you probably only care about bugs that affect your program, then your program's own test suite should cover those test cases already!
If BSD/OS is sooo much faster than Linux 2.4, then why does NO ONE use any BSD for SPECweb benchmarks? I see Linux 2.4, Windows 2000, AIX, Tru64, and HPUX.
Slashdot Mirror
In elementary school, I did a science experiment involving taste. I made 100 mini-muffins, divided into combinations of artificial flavors and colors. For example, the red muffins might be blueberry flavor and the yellow muffins might be chocolate (or whatever). I asked people to eat them and tell me what flavor they tasted. I had dozens of test subjects and they ALL guessed the wrong, "obvious" flavor (red = cherry, blue = blueberry) except my friend Michael. kids are st00pid.
Your solution sounds a lot like the same solution I already proposed:
me: And what about satellite latency? The random number stream must use sequence numbers because I doubt the sender and receiver can syncrhonize their CPU clocks to run at exactly the same 10 million reads per second rate!
you: simple to solve, include a second syncronization number (which are sequential) with each random number sent.
Is Quartz a renamed component from Next? I thought Quartz was new for Mac OS X. I guess that's what they WANT me to believe.. ;)
Speaking of true random number generators, check out SGI's Lavarand .
;)
"Lavarand... harnessing the power of Lava Lite® lamps to generate truly random numbers since 1996"
fun!
the start code itself is vulnerable. With quantum cracking, even a 128-bit key may fall within moments, in which case the resulting datastream will be insecure. (This is the 'weakest link' approach, as the whole system relies on the impracticality of decrypting a conventional crypto system in a given timeframe and is therefore not 'impenetrable')
How are the sender and receiver supposed to synchronize if the satellite is sending 10 million random numbers per second? The sender must wait as the receiver needs time to receive the start message. The sender can't start its OTP if the receiver is not perfectly sync'd.
And what about satellite latency? The random number stream must use sequence numbers because I doubt the sender and receiver can syncrhonize their CPU clocks to run at exactly the same 10 million reads per second rate!
The cracker in the middle knows to start recording the satellite's number stream when he first sees the sender's start message. He knows to stop recording the number stream when the sender's a message FIN (or whatever).
What is the Omega Directive?
.
I always thought the theatrical version made no sense..
The summary was incomprehensible.
As much as I like to see people putting more energy into the exploration and exploitation of space, doesn't California have a lot of infrastructure to work toward building up before worrying about the cosmos? They've just had an earthquake that killed thousands and thousands of people. How many of those people could have been saved by importing American building standards and restrictions and adding more support to the current buildings?
It just seems that California has constant problems with nature as well as their difficulty in even maintaining basic power for their population makes me wary that they may best be spending their money elsewhere.
I, just an average Joe with no work experience in the graphics industry and only minimal hobbiest experience, can design and write an application for in one eventing is patentable.
Do I proceed with my business plans, and explain to the court that doing something with a computer in the same way that it is done in real life is not novel when the lawsuit comes in?
You are creating a business with such a low barrier to entry that you wrote the software in one evening.
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html
HINT: There are no Windows or Linux boxes!
Rank Site No. samples Average Max Latest OS Server Netblock Owner
1 sack.ees.com 17 897 906 906 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) US Sprint
2 www.fks.bt 37 885 906 906 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) US Sprint
3 www.charite.de 67 872 910 910 IRIX Netscape-Commerce/1.1 Universitaetsklinikum Rudolf Virchow
4 www.cult.cu 2 813 813 813 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.1 (Unix) Carthe Networks
5 www.cdl.cup.com 40 810 837 837 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) Hopemoon Internet
6 cdl.cup.com 45 808 837 837 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) Hopemoon Internet
7 bm98.cup.com 43 807 837 837 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) Hopemoon Internet
8 69pornplace.com 50 759 785 785 BSD/OS Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) Verio, Inc.
9 www.yamagata-cci.or.jp 49 711 740 740 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) Hopemoon Internet
10 cache.jp.apan.net 33 702 722 722 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.1 (Unix) Asia Pacific Advanced Network - Japan
11 203.181.248.20 40 698 722 722 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.1 (Unix) Asia Pacific Advanced Network - Japan
12 www.canadaplace.gc.ca 6 694 697 697 IRIX Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 BGS Advanced Server Farm
13 canadaplace.gc.ca 6 694 697 697 IRIX Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 BGS Advanced Server Farm
14 www.directinternet.com 17 679 687 687 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2 NileNet, Ltd.
15 www.infoport.com 17 679 687 687 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2 NileNet, Ltd.
16 www.sasg.com 12 672 678 678 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) BiznessOnline
17 aed.org 17 664 674 674 BSD/OS Apache/1.2.4 Acadmey for Educational Development
18 www.superior.net 28 664 678 678 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) BiznessOnline
19 iana.netnod.se 18 664 673 673 NetBSD/OpenBSD Apache/1.3b5 D-GIX Service network
20 www.rms.org 39 664 688 688 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2 NileNet, Ltd.
21 solo.merita.fi 62 662 695 695 BSD/OS TANTAU Application Server/2.1.1 Union Bank of Finland Ltd
22 www.nilenet.com 49 658 688 688 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2 NileNet Ltd
23 www.regalplastics.com 57 653 687 687 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2 NileNet, Ltd.
24 bayern3.de 9 651 656 656 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) PHP/3.0.9 Bayerischer Rundfunk
25 www.borica.bg 27 647 665 665 NetBSD/OpenBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Provider Local Registry
26 www.celticboxes.ie 6 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
27 www.aibifs.ie 7 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
28 www.alliance-francaise.ie 7 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
29 www.antiques.ie 7 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
30 www.arantours.ie 7 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
31 www.arc.ie 7 647 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
32 www.cllo.ie 6 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
33 www.automaticsprinklers.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
34 www.dsor.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
35 www.cti-clonmel.ie 6 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
36 www.ems.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
37 www.fortune.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
38 www.qadris.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
39 www.eyecon.ie 7 646 649 649 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
40 www.u-haul-it.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
41 www.activeireland.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
42 www.ahca.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
43 www.announcements.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
44 www.apasystems.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
45 www.ardtech.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
46 www.ardtechindustries.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
47 www.athlonecc.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
48 www.atresonance.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
49 www.banotti.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
50 www.bercom.ie 8 645 648 648 FreeBSD Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Internet Interactions
I think Pair Programming is probably one of the most unique and promising XP ideas. When someone else is watching you type, you must convince them the code works, makes sense, and isn't hacky. The sum of both developers programming and product knowledge makes the combined solution even better. Unfortunately, I doubt many employers would be willing to hire two developers to "do the work of one person". Plus not everyone can deal with the close watch of Pair Programming, though these people are probably not great team players for non-XP shops.
chris
or these?
O M
http://whois.userland.com/default$aol.com
AOL.COM.STOCKHOLDERS.GET.ORALSEXONDEMAND.COM
AOL.COM.KCAUTOWEB.COM
AOL.COM.IS.REGULARLY.HAX0RED.BY.INSIDE-AOL.COM
AOL.COM.HACKED.BY.PSYKOJOKO.ON.A.ROOT-NETWORK.C
AOL.COM.EATMYSHIT.ORG
AOL.COM.AMSLIQUIDATORS.COM
AOL.COM
Domain Name: AOLTIMEWARNERYAHOO.COM
Registrant:
America Online, Inc.
22000 AOL Way
Dulles, VA 20166
US
Administrative Contact:
Domain Administration, AOL
America Online, Inc.
22000 AOL Way
Dulles, VA 20166
US
Email. domains@aol.net
Tel. 703 265 4670
Technical Contact:
Domain Administration, AOL
America Online, Inc.
22000 AOL Way
Dulles, VA 20166
US
Email. domains@aol.net
Tel. 703 265 4670
Domain servers:
dns-01.ns.aol.com
152.163.159.232
dns-02.ns.aol.com
205.188.157.232
whois aoltimewarneryahoo.com
looks like he is holding a marijuana cigarette, some of that good ole reefer, maaan!
I can't help but think that it would be better code if it noted the flaws in the standard routines and either avoided them or wrapped them instead of replacing them outright.
Or perhaps he should report the supposed bugs to so they can be fixed for everyone else.
I used to work at Microsoft as a tester for Windows NT 5 (pre Windows 2000). I had read the "required reading" of "Showstopper" and was curious to see Cutler's code. I found his assembly code for NT spinlocks and it was highly commented and very elegant.
;)
When I was at school at the University of Washington, one my profs worked with Cutler at DEC. He said Cutler would print out his code into two piles: code and tests. My prof said the test code pile was 3x taller than the shipping code. Cutler is a huge stickler for testing your own damn code!
Humes are just weak little monkey boys.
"AI" is simply the sequel to "Daryl". This time around, Daryl gets the girl... and his revenge!
Unless you're exporting those file systems to anything other than Lunix clients.
Why? Is Linux 2.4's NFS incompatible with other NFS clients? Stoopid kernel developers.
Frank Lloyd Wright are completely static, unadaptable to their inhabitants' needs. When his clients often complained that their roofs leaked, Wright would tell them "that's how you know it's a roof" and refused to fix it. Wright homes are well known for their leaky roofs. He built the building HE wanted, regardless of the client's wishes.
Perl and Linux, however, are very flexible organisms, grown incrementally and organically to meet precisely their users' needs. Exactly the opposite of Wright's design mentality.
This is a really good point. If your program depends on third-party libraries, then you must test the libraries too. If you just assume they are perfect, you are asking for trouble. Perhaps your new code is reusing the old library in a way or context unexpected by the library's designer.
Of course, you don't really need to go a write a complete test suite for every library you use. That's tough, especially for closed source libraries. Since you probably only care about bugs that affect your program, then your program's own test suite should cover those test cases already!
If BSD/OS is sooo much faster than Linux 2.4, then why does NO ONE use any BSD for SPECweb benchmarks ? I see Linux 2.4, Windows 2000, AIX, Tru64, and HPUX.