cowering? i am michael kristopeit. i live at 4513 brittany ct. eau claire, wi, 54701. i have multiple "logins" because i CAN have multiple "logins". i have never claimed to be more than exactly what i am: A SINGLE PERSON NAMED MICHAEL KRISTOPEIT.
you are exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.
considering we are talking about the noun form of the word "bug" and you're claiming that you are CERTAINLY using "bug" as a verb............ you're an idiot.
considering 123,462,235 years is still OVER A DECADE you're still not understanding why you're a moron... YOU ARE AMBIGUOUS.
i don't really care what you care about... i'm pointing out that calling a software feature a "bug" is ignorantly masochistic.
professionals, SUCH AS MYSELF, refer to such images intended for user tracking as "tracking pixels", and would suggest the same to anyone careless enough to call them "bugs".
yes, bug is a dual purpose word, but this conversation is ENTIRELY about only ONE of those forms. you're an idiot.
are you familiar with phrases such as "the room was bugged with a listening device?" the ambiguity of the generalized term "bug" makes its use moronic.
i've never heard of the term "web bugs" and i've been doing web development pretty much since the web existed, and full time professionally since 1999 after receiving degrees in computer science and mathematics.
you're using bug as a verb in your examples... i'm talking about "bug" as a noun. "tracking pixel" is the industry standard term.
Slashdot Mirror
take it however you want.
you are exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
you're an idiot.
present yourself to me; admit what you've done, and i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
you're completely pathetic.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
are you attempting insult, feeb?
you're completely pathetic.
considering 123,462,235 years is still OVER A DECADE you're still not understanding why you're a moron... YOU ARE AMBIGUOUS.
ambiguity is the tool of the unsure.
you're completely pathetic.
a "web bug" is NOTHING but a term used by morons with no respect for the person they are conveying their ignorance to.
you're a moron.
professionals, SUCH AS MYSELF, refer to such images intended for user tracking as "tracking pixels", and would suggest the same to anyone careless enough to call them "bugs".
yes, bug is a dual purpose word, but this conversation is ENTIRELY about only ONE of those forms. you're an idiot.
are you familiar with phrases such as "the room was bugged with a listening device?" the ambiguity of the generalized term "bug" makes its use moronic.
you're a moron.
"tracking pixel" is a term that already has a commonly understood meaning (and has for OVER A DECADE)
professionals don't propagate the potential for confusion.
you're hypocritically creating partisanship of your own.
you're using bug as a verb in your examples... i'm talking about "bug" as a noun. "tracking pixel" is the industry standard term.
calling a bug a feature is one thing, but calling a feature a bug is ignorantly masochistic.