My dictionary has following definition. Parody - an adaption of the words of an author, to a different purpose.
Word and group on which parody is based - PETA.
You missed the point by miles. peta.ORG was not their property. In the same way garryanderson.com is not mine (it is still available). Others share these names - what God-given right has anyone got, to say it belongs exclusively to them.
You don't need to steal my clothes, you can borrow them if you like. What was all that other rubbish about;-) I do not condone theft, spammers or any illegal activity.
Dot REG for registered names is the only answer.
No conflict for world in the format: name.class.reg.country.
.REG is the TM tag. This TLD would serve as a certificate of authentication - so no fraud. No sex sites, no so-called cybersquatting etc.
Also they will not feel obligated to protect it and register their name in EVERY TLD that comes out.
Explained more fully on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with WIPO.org. I got this domain to make several logical points - I believe it does that.
This is the first idea that I had when started 7 months ago. Recently found that a attorney by name of Lawrence Siskind had it September 97. He suggested something on the lines of ford.006 (or whatever class).
Problem - it does not take into account the country. Each has its different classes. The final solution would have to be name.class.REG.country -.REG acting as the TM tag.
I am not big headed enough to believe I had this idea first. ICANN would have - indeed MUST have known this is the only solution to allow ALL the TM holders to use their name. Recently found proof they had been given similar proposal.
I explain more fully on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
The fact that he used peta.ORG allowed you to hear his voice. Or perhaps you believe in free speech with someones hand over your mouth?
The authorities know the answer - to reserve dot reg for registered names. No so-called 'cybersquatting', coming across sex sites or fraud. Can you not see that?
It is a Domain Name System NOT a Trademark System.
It is, as you say, "too loosely regulated" for trademarks. If something like dot reg was reserved only for registered marks, it would solve all problems. Nobody could stop them using their domain name and consumer would know they were the 'real thing'.
It is through Internet mismanagement, that the situation is as bad as it is. I have protest site at WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
It is a Domain Name System NOT a Trademark System.
I agree 100 percent, PETA as a registered organization should have protected webspace. The example I use is dot reg, reserved only for registered marks.
It is through Internet mismanagement, that the situation is as bad as it is. I have protest site at WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
If all these groups get together, they may stand a chance. At the moment they are fragmented.
Free speech and domain rights - Initiate contact with each other. Find common ground, make yourself into one or two major parties. It will give you a more powerful voice.
Agree - But free speech is what they do not want, they hate dissension. It is one of the reasons the authorities made the rules to take your domain off you so easy.
I have protest site at www.WIPO.org.uk. Needless to say nothing to do with WIPO.org.
ICANN know that only name.class.REG.country will solve the problems of trademark conflict and cybersquatting.
Reserved only for trademark holders, it also serves as a certificate of authentication. Full explaination at www.WIPO.org.uk - It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
Disclaimer for litigation mad Attorneys - some are very happy with the current situation. It is a Intellectual Property legal fee goldmine.
The reason you see my name, is because I stand up for what I believe. Whereas you are spineless no-mark, not to comment on the issues I raise. All you can do is just slag it off.
Perhaps you have got a brain cell which you can use to debate your analysis? - But, somehow I doubt it.
Maybe I do it because I think it important and so idiots like you get the message.
Hope I have made you angry enough to say why you think I am wrong?;-)
Have you seen the STUPID decisions they have been making?
Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes and cybersquatting (on my site).
Have you seen the decisions they have been making?
Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes (on my site).
WIPO are a power mad organization, making some pretty stupid decisions. Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes (on my site).
If you are American, then WIPO already are in your life:
Story on ZDTV: "A new copyright bill was recently passed by Congress. It makes copyright rules consistent with the WIPO copyright treaty. This is much more restrictive than current US law. Some say it may even make it illegal to have copyrighted material in your cache!"
Take them seriously, things will get worse. ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes.
It is on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
There has been MANY specific examples were they have screwed up.
They also make bad decisions. ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes.
It is on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
Those profiteers charge $70 to enter just 1 record into domain database, and keep on making profit from you, for ever. And you want to give them more?
The authorities know the solution to 'cybersquatting'. It is on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk. It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
WIPO is a power mad organization. See the news articles on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk. It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
In the UK we have the R.I.P. Bill - online monitoring of everyone. Surfing, emails - everything. If you hide any encryption password from them you are charged with an offence.
The politicians, who could do something to stop it, are idiots who do not understand the implications.
WIPO are power mad organization - Here are some stories linked on on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - it has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
Examples of WIPO Increasing Status and Powers
Story on ZDTV: "A new copyright bill was recently passed by Congress. It makes copyright rules consistent with the WIPO copyright treaty. This is much more restrictive than current US law. Some say it may even make it illegal to have copyrighted material in your cache!"
Australia urged to come on board: "A delegation of WIPO directors, including the group's director-general, Camil Idris, were in Sydney and Canberra last week to invite the Australian Government to sign a statement of cooperation to extend WIPO's dispute resolution process to include the.au country code top-level domains (ccTLDs),.com.au,.net.au and.org.au.","Gurry,... said WIPO was keen to extend its dispute resolution process to include all the world's 240 ccTLDs under WIPO's jurisdiction."
Indeed WIPO, themselves say, "Yet even as the WIPO moves forward vigorously, its accomplishments and ambitious agenda remain relatively unknown in the United States outside narrow professional circles."
I say "This vigorous ambitious agenda of yours is stopping free speech and peoples rights."
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, it should be WIPO.org.uk
Well it is 2:30 AM.
A trademark is granted by a *specific* COUNTRY for JUST one type of *specific* goods or one type of *specific* service.
Thousands may share the same trademark. I give the example of Domino on my protest site WIPO.org.uk
The obvious answer is to supply a restricted TLD, say
Trademarks need the classification and country to stop consumers being confused.
So, with the tag of
Were as, you talk such common sense. Perhaps you can answer this:
How can ANYBODY have sole world rights to a generic word like ZERO?
Even WIPO could not justify taking that name. Which is why they are going to expand their own powers.
They are POWER MAD.
I TOLD YOU SO! WIPO are blinking power mad.
Next year they are going to bring in more draconian laws.
From then, not just trademarks will be prey to them.
There is a solution to this mess. Have a
www.WIPO.org.uk is nothing to do with WIPO.org
Obviously NOT a good point if you missed it.
;-) I do not condone theft, spammers or any illegal activity.
.REG is the TM tag. This TLD would serve as a certificate of authentication - so no fraud. No sex sites, no so-called cybersquatting etc.
My dictionary has following definition. Parody - an adaption of the words of an author, to a different purpose.
Word and group on which parody is based - PETA.
You missed the point by miles. peta.ORG was not their property. In the same way garryanderson.com is not mine (it is still available). Others share these names - what God-given right has anyone got, to say it belongs exclusively to them.
You don't need to steal my clothes, you can borrow them if you like. What was all that other rubbish about
Dot REG for registered names is the only answer.
No conflict for world in the format: name.class.reg.country.
Also they will not feel obligated to protect it and register their name in EVERY TLD that comes out.
Explained more fully on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with WIPO.org. I got this domain to make several logical points - I believe it does that.
This is the first idea that I had when started 7 months ago. Recently found that a attorney by name of Lawrence Siskind had it September 97. He suggested something on the lines of ford.006 (or whatever class).
.REG acting as the TM tag.
Problem - it does not take into account the country. Each has its different classes. The final solution would have to be name.class.REG.country -
I am not big headed enough to believe I had this idea first. ICANN would have - indeed MUST have known this is the only solution to allow ALL the TM holders to use their name. Recently found proof they had been given similar proposal.
I explain more fully on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
The fact that he used peta.ORG allowed you to hear his voice. Or perhaps you believe in free speech with someones hand over your mouth?
The authorities know the answer - to reserve dot reg for registered names. No so-called 'cybersquatting', coming across sex sites or fraud. Can you not see that?
It is a Domain Name System NOT a Trademark System.
It is, as you say, "too loosely regulated" for trademarks. If something like dot reg was reserved only for registered marks, it would solve all problems. Nobody could stop them using their domain name and consumer would know they were the 'real thing'.
It is through Internet mismanagement, that the situation is as bad as it is. I have protest site at WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
It is a Domain Name System NOT a Trademark System.
I agree 100 percent, PETA as a registered organization should have protected webspace. The example I use is dot reg, reserved only for registered marks.
It is through Internet mismanagement, that the situation is as bad as it is. I have protest site at WIPO.org.uk - nothing to do with WIPO.org.
If all these groups get together, they may stand a chance. At the moment they are fragmented.
Free speech and domain rights - Initiate contact with each other. Find common ground, make yourself into one or two major parties. It will give you a more powerful voice.
Agree - But free speech is what they do not want, they hate dissension. It is one of the reasons the authorities made the rules to take your domain off you so easy.
I have protest site at www.WIPO.org.uk. Needless to say nothing to do with WIPO.org.
What about peoples rights to free speech? Seems some of you have no backbone, to agree the Internet to be taken over like this.
How about .robins for your family?
ICANN are holding things up for questionable motives.
Anti WIPO and ICANN site - www.WIPO.org.uk
ICANN know that only name.class.REG.country will solve the problems of trademark conflict and cybersquatting.
Reserved only for trademark holders, it also serves as a certificate of authentication. Full explaination at www.WIPO.org.uk - It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
Disclaimer for litigation mad Attorneys - some are very happy with the current situation. It is a Intellectual Property legal fee goldmine.
Moderator of my previous posting is a STUPID IDIOT calling it 'Redundant'.
;-)
It was right on topic. They achieved their goal of getting it ignored by those using the scores.
Well done, but it was an easy task even for a thicky like you. You obviously do not understand the issues.
Perhaps you have got the intelligence to explain why it was so marked? But, somehow I doubt it
Anonymous coward - the name fits you well.
;-)
The reason you see my name, is because I stand up for what I believe. Whereas you are spineless no-mark, not to comment on the issues I raise. All you can do is just slag it off.
Perhaps you have got a brain cell which you can use to debate your analysis? - But, somehow I doubt it.
Maybe I do it because I think it important and so idiots like you get the message.
Hope I have made you angry enough to say why you think I am wrong?
Have you seen the STUPID decisions they have been making?
Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes and cybersquatting (on my site).
Have you seen the decisions they have been making?
Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes (on my site).
WIPO are a power mad organization, making some pretty stupid decisions. Read about them on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes (on my site).
If you are American, then WIPO already are in your life:
Story on ZDTV: "A new copyright bill was recently passed by Congress. It makes copyright rules consistent with the WIPO copyright treaty. This is much more restrictive than current US law. Some say it may even make it illegal to have copyrighted material in your cache!"
Take them seriously, things will get worse. ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes.
It is on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
There has been MANY specific examples were they have screwed up.
They also make bad decisions. ICANN and WIPO know the solution to trademark disputes.
It is on my protest site, www.WIPO.org.uk - no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
Those profiteers charge $70 to enter just 1 record into domain database, and keep on making profit from you, for ever. And you want to give them more?
The authorities know the solution to 'cybersquatting'. It is on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk. It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
WIPO is a power mad organization. See the news articles on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk. It has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
In the UK we have the R.I.P. Bill - online monitoring of everyone. Surfing, emails - everything. If you hide any encryption password from them you are charged with an offence.
The politicians, who could do something to stop it, are idiots who do not understand the implications.
WIPO are power mad organization - Here are some stories linked on on my protest site www.WIPO.org.uk - it has no connection with, and wishes to be totally disassociated from, The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO.ORG).
.au country code top-level domains (ccTLDs), .com.au, .net.au and .org.au.","Gurry, ... said WIPO was keen to extend its dispute resolution process to include all the world's 240 ccTLDs under WIPO's jurisdiction."
Examples of WIPO Increasing Status and Powers
Story on ZDTV: "A new copyright bill was recently passed by Congress. It makes copyright rules consistent with the WIPO copyright treaty. This is much more restrictive than current US law. Some say it may even make it illegal to have copyrighted material in your cache!"
Australia urged to come on board: "A delegation of WIPO directors, including the group's director-general, Camil Idris, were in Sydney and Canberra last week to invite the Australian Government to sign a statement of cooperation to extend WIPO's dispute resolution process to include the
Indeed WIPO, themselves say, "Yet even as the WIPO moves forward vigorously, its accomplishments and ambitious agenda remain relatively unknown in the United States outside narrow professional circles."
I say "This vigorous ambitious agenda of yours is stopping free speech and peoples rights."
(emphasis added)