You said to use error handlers for input from users ONLY?
bullshit moron... learn to read... what i said (quoted from my message) was "exception handlers are very useful for any kind of input or api calls etc".
did you see the "etc" on the end there?
Ever heard of using keypress events in entry fields and validating entry there instead
i use onchange events etc for validation, but in those events, i usually wrap my single line of code for converting from string to integer (or whatever the case) with an exception handler, and the handler code changes the color of the label or something like that.
when you dump structured error handlers you get what is wrong a good 95% of the time and it's correct and saves you time debugging
no you don't and no it doesn't... maybe you should look up the definition of "debugging"
anyway, i've had enough educating you. if you want more advice you're going to have to start paying by the hour... and i double the rate for idiots like you
what if an alien spaceship tried to infect your rediculous Python code with some alien virus? you would be totally fucked without exception handlers i'm sure:)
exception handlers aren't for debugging... fool... they are for.... (drum roll)... handling exceptions!!!! hahahaha!!! (and if you are wrapping code in handlers for unknown exceptions you're doing it for the wrong reason... exception handlers are for handling expected exceptions - popping up a message that says something like "oh oh something fucked up and the programmer has no idea what" isn't very reassuring for the user).
maybe you need a bit more practice debugging to understand how it differs (try debugging your stupid function first)
yep... the bug is in at least two of those posts (i didn't bother clicking on the rest but i'm sure they are the same)
if you are using a script, it isn't the same as the one you post, because your posted code has an indentation bug and won't interpret (and no amount of error handling will change that lol)
leave the bug in there... at least i'll be able to continue to highlight it to the rest of the slashdot readership and they can decide how much of a noob you are for themselves
keep posting your buggy code then... it makes you look bad, not me
i'm just another bored fool trying in vain to highlight a bug in it
ignore that advice all you want, but anyone who understands Python will read it and think "hahahaha there's an indentation bug on the 5th line... what a dumbass!!!!"
particularly because of the arrogant and rediculous context that you repeatedly post it
your FUD isn't even FUD... because there's no fear, uncertainty or doubt about what you post... everyone knows right off the bat that you're full of shit:)
you don't know much about geeks apparently... many of the geeks i know acquire games for free
may not in be in the target demographic
i'm glad to see you've figured that out... have you also figured out the target demographic is actually jobless dupes on welfare with the cash and time to blow on something like minecraft? there are probably waaaay more than 11 million of them in the US alone
not that you'll likely believe anyway, but if you look up FAR Part 23 on the FAA's eCFR website and google ARMMPDS-01 (formerly MIL-HBK-5), Jan Roskam, Catia, FAA Form 797 (statement of compliance) you might get some idea. yeah i could have googled all those, but the likelihood of all those being on one handy page is fairly remote. good hunting:)
you're disappointing APK... here I was actually hoping you might come up with something good that I could go to work on, but alas nothing of substance as usual
i didn't see any code running... for all i know you could have manually typed the supposed output
there is a bug in your posted code though. if you can't see it, then you're an incompetent noob (especially since i've spelled it out to you on a few occasions)
exception handlers are very useful for any kind of input or api calls etc
i wouldn't just wrap all my code in an exception handler though. i would wrap certain calls in handlers to handle specific and expected exceptions
exception handlers have absolutely nothing to do with code debugging
wrapping code in exception handlers won't get rid of bugs (surely that's obvious to you)
so where's the printer driver code in your buggy function douchebag?
I use a small program to get the handles of between 20 and 5,000 text items. I then may modify the (text) value of the handles a dozen (or more) times as the project progresses
was i the only one who thought dxf + shell script when reading this?
my story is straight... you're confused because you think debugging has something to do with error handling... you poor ignorant moron
You said to use error handlers for input from users ONLY?
bullshit moron... learn to read... what i said (quoted from my message) was "exception handlers are very useful for any kind of input or api calls etc".
did you see the "etc" on the end there?
Ever heard of using keypress events in entry fields and validating entry there instead
i use onchange events etc for validation, but in those events, i usually wrap my single line of code for converting from string to integer (or whatever the case) with an exception handler, and the handler code changes the color of the label or something like that.
when you dump structured error handlers you get what is wrong a good 95% of the time and it's correct and saves you time debugging
no you don't and no it doesn't... maybe you should look up the definition of "debugging"
anyway, i've had enough educating you. if you want more advice you're going to have to start paying by the hour... and i double the rate for idiots like you
what if an alien spaceship tried to infect your rediculous Python code with some alien virus? you would be totally fucked without exception handlers i'm sure :)
exception handlers aren't for debugging... fool... they are for.... (drum roll)... handling exceptions!!!! hahahaha!!! (and if you are wrapping code in handlers for unknown exceptions you're doing it for the wrong reason... exception handlers are for handling expected exceptions - popping up a message that says something like "oh oh something fucked up and the programmer has no idea what" isn't very reassuring for the user).
maybe you need a bit more practice debugging to understand how it differs (try debugging your stupid function first)
google also no doubt has some handy tips
yep... the bug is in at least two of those posts (i didn't bother clicking on the rest but i'm sure they are the same)
if you are using a script, it isn't the same as the one you post, because your posted code has an indentation bug and won't interpret (and no amount of error handling will change that lol)
leave the bug in there... at least i'll be able to continue to highlight it to the rest of the slashdot readership and they can decide how much of a noob you are for themselves
keep posting your buggy code then... it makes you look bad, not me
i'm just another bored fool trying in vain to highlight a bug in it
ignore that advice all you want, but anyone who understands Python will read it and think "hahahaha there's an indentation bug on the 5th line... what a dumbass!!!!"
particularly because of the arrogant and rediculous context that you repeatedly post it
your FUD isn't even FUD... because there's no fear, uncertainty or doubt about what you post... everyone knows right off the bat that you're full of shit :)
No b.s. in this link (linux hacked & more)
everything you post is bullshit... but at least it has some entertainment value
you can't even post bug-free Python
so you're a dupe... but you're right that dupes like you subsidise the geek gaming world. your efforts are appreciated :)
i'm smarter than you... that's all that matters... and i can find a bug that you are oblivious to hahahahahahah!!!!! (there's your proof)
you're a moron for even assuming i need to justify myself... fuck knuckle
if you don't like what i say, go back to fucking your sister
...just another department of microsoft and AMD make better CPUs anyway. nothing will be missed.
found that bug in your Python function yet?
the compliance dec is actually CASA form 979
11 million dupes have bought Minecraft
ftfy
you don't know much about geeks apparently... many of the geeks i know acquire games for free
may not in be in the target demographic
i'm glad to see you've figured that out... have you also figured out the target demographic is actually jobless dupes on welfare with the cash and time to blow on something like minecraft? there are probably waaaay more than 11 million of them in the US alone
:)
not that you'll likely believe anyway, but if you look up FAR Part 23 on the FAA's eCFR website and google ARMMPDS-01 (formerly MIL-HBK-5), Jan Roskam, Catia, FAA Form 797 (statement of compliance) you might get some idea. yeah i could have googled all those, but the likelihood of all those being on one handy page is fairly remote. good hunting
i use lower case because i'm lazy
*chuckles*
more bullshit as expected
nothing about actual vulnerabilities
you're disappointing APK... here I was actually hoping you might come up with something good that I could go to work on, but alas nothing of substance as usual
i don't think you've read them, because they don't show "security blunders for Linux"
:)
keep going though... this is some funny shit
try looking at the code in your posts
i didn't see any code running... for all i know you could have manually typed the supposed output
there is a bug in your posted code though. if you can't see it, then you're an incompetent noob (especially since i've spelled it out to you on a few occasions)
exception handlers are very useful for any kind of input or api calls etc
i wouldn't just wrap all my code in an exception handler though. i would wrap certain calls in handlers to handle specific and expected exceptions
exception handlers have absolutely nothing to do with code debugging
wrapping code in exception handlers won't get rid of bugs (surely that's obvious to you)
so where's the printer driver code in your buggy function douchebag?
...and draftsight to show the dxf of course :)
I use a small program to get the handles of between 20 and 5,000 text items. I then may modify the (text) value of the handles a dozen (or more) times as the project progresses
was i the only one who thought dxf + shell script when reading this?
poor planning, incompetent leadership and management, personal beliefs and politics, etc... of course its always the software's fault
i'm guessing you were in charge
vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week
slashdot quote of the year?
i already debugged it. not hard to debug 3 lines of code. it doesn't need exception handlers.
...and at least i actually debug my code; you still can't acknowledge the bug in yours - example here http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957
another rhetorical question: how does adding error handlers make code easier to debug?
the servers were most likely administered by wintards with no concept of security... social engineering at its best