The fact that you suggest there are no liberals at all on Fox News illustrates the fact you've never watched it which puts your position, opinions and comments related to it entirely devoid of credibility.
No one doubted Reagan's birth as a Natural Born Citizen. Some doubted McCain's as he was technically born a military installation outside of the continent. If you examine the story of Obama's birth, his extended family and his parents and any documents surrounding him and them, you'll see there is significant reason to be suspicious. Read the details as to what criteria the hospital uses for birth certificates and read the criteria the newspaper uses to publish birth times. You're close but you're not quite deep enough in. If you've yet to hear the theory, it's because you've only listened to the mainstream media's strawman arguments on TV against someone who is ill-equiped to defend their opinions.
No, what happened was 2 planes hit the towers. Yeah, you may have jumped up like a maniac running out the room as the President or sent a message that the executive branch of the government are subject to the whim of terrorists by immediately getting up on National TV and walking out. Bush didn't do a great job of communicating and made a lot of questionable choices but this one was bang on. You really think the President is required for the entire executive branch to move? As of the whole government is paralyzed while he sleeps? Do you even know how your government operates? My mouth is agape too, just for a different reason.
Skewing the informational releases to damage a specific country? Who knows what sort of exonerating evidence he chose not to release that is still classified (meaning they can't defend themselves.) But yeah, don't let that ruin your fantasy land.
Yeah, they do, and why is that? Is it because the US has successfully prevented that from happening on its own soil? I wonder how one accomplishes that?
Almost every European country is having a degree of Islamic insurgency. Your grandparents understood that quick brutal violence will end the war faster and cost less civilian lives in the long run. It took two nukes to crack the will of the fanatical Japanese. It might not be that easy this time.
That's funny, guns are designed to prevent people from being killed in a very dangerous situation too. Maybe you should see what happens when you or someone you care about get into a very dangerous situation and don't have one.
You've proven you're not trust worthy with documents that are classified as you help other broadcast it across to the nations enemies during wartime. No one is censoring you but I bet there's a lot of people out there fighting to keep it that way that wouldn't mind neutralizing a few of you fucktards for jeopardizing their safety. Yeah, nothing says "wake up, sheeple" like irritating some secretaries at PayPal with your retarded actions. Good work, Chief. Way to stand up for Freedom!
Because Mainstream News organizations would never have publicly posted a list of vital US locations. That's why. You get into that territory; you are certainly entering the realm of Espionage. Don't think that's just relegated to citizens of the USA either.
What's wrong with trying to stage a coup against a tyrant that explicitly threatens your nation, its citizens and its businesses? Nothing. I guess that's how you join the league of the "Wrong" people. I've never seen an industry in Canada threaten to destroy the US or capitalism; so maybe you're onto something.
"The People" are not your favourite little bands of South American thugs, believe it or not. The people are broader and what happens when the opposition movements in those countries flee? Whose productivity will "The People" leech off?
Right, like the Democratic elections that brought forth Hitler. Democracy is not magical. If people vote in leaders who aid a foreign government that has thousands of ICBM's targeting your city and has repeatedly threatened to "crush" you in some way or another, it's your responsibility, in defense of your nation, to act accordingly.
The Internet != ISPs?? REALLY. Wow that's news for me because I'm pretty sure that "The Internet" is in fact a collection of private networks dominated largely by ISPs. DNS being just a very popular service for the Internet. How you can't see that such a minute reason such as "Net Neutrality" as an excuse to regulate private networks seems to be justifiable for you.. National Security will trump that really quick. The logic being; if we can do this to enforce the way we believe the internet should run then why can't we do it to keep the nation safe (a drastically more important function of Government.) You open the gate and this is what comes next. If those private networks are not private anymore, look what happens to everything else in public life. It's a Boolean switch. Private or public. Not both. You're flipping the switch.
That's some real idealism you have there. In the land of Realism.. a pragmatic approach that has guided foreign policies for the past 70-80 years.. we deal with other nations in the best way that suits our interests. That doesn't mean it's corrupt to put pressure on or to make a deal. You're making a leap in logic.
That and the 1st amendment applies to citizens of the US. What will you do if a diplomatic spat due to these or future leaks cause a major war that wouldn't have happened otherwise? Don't presume it can't happen. These documents are secret for a reason and it's not to hide them from you. It's to hide them from the thin skinned diplomats on the other side of the table.
Good thing then most of Slashdot wants the US Government to take control of the Internet via the FCC. The FCC that censors the things it controls. Nothing could go wrong there! Just give me my diplomatic gossip and unrestricted torrents; I deserve them!/s
If the Government could censor it they would because it's their responsibility to safeguard information like that. So, you all go ahead and give them that power. See how it works out..
Maybe it's because you're foolish to let your prejudices guide you that you don't have a job. What nationalities do you think are often involved in analysis? Do you speak Arabic? Probably not, right?
Slashdot Mirror
Perfectly stated. Good work.
I think what he meant is "You're an idiot" but probably didn't realize that until he saw your response.
The fact that you suggest there are no liberals at all on Fox News illustrates the fact you've never watched it which puts your position, opinions and comments related to it entirely devoid of credibility.
No one doubted Reagan's birth as a Natural Born Citizen. Some doubted McCain's as he was technically born a military installation outside of the continent. If you examine the story of Obama's birth, his extended family and his parents and any documents surrounding him and them, you'll see there is significant reason to be suspicious. Read the details as to what criteria the hospital uses for birth certificates and read the criteria the newspaper uses to publish birth times. You're close but you're not quite deep enough in. If you've yet to hear the theory, it's because you've only listened to the mainstream media's strawman arguments on TV against someone who is ill-equiped to defend their opinions.
The big deal is you're wrong to suggest Natural Born Citizen == Naturalized Citizen.
No, what happened was 2 planes hit the towers. Yeah, you may have jumped up like a maniac running out the room as the President or sent a message that the executive branch of the government are subject to the whim of terrorists by immediately getting up on National TV and walking out. Bush didn't do a great job of communicating and made a lot of questionable choices but this one was bang on. You really think the President is required for the entire executive branch to move? As of the whole government is paralyzed while he sleeps? Do you even know how your government operates? My mouth is agape too, just for a different reason.
Skewing the informational releases to damage a specific country? Who knows what sort of exonerating evidence he chose not to release that is still classified (meaning they can't defend themselves.) But yeah, don't let that ruin your fantasy land.
Yeah, they do, and why is that? Is it because the US has successfully prevented that from happening on its own soil? I wonder how one accomplishes that? Almost every European country is having a degree of Islamic insurgency. Your grandparents understood that quick brutal violence will end the war faster and cost less civilian lives in the long run. It took two nukes to crack the will of the fanatical Japanese. It might not be that easy this time.
That's funny, guns are designed to prevent people from being killed in a very dangerous situation too. Maybe you should see what happens when you or someone you care about get into a very dangerous situation and don't have one.
You've proven you're not trust worthy with documents that are classified as you help other broadcast it across to the nations enemies during wartime. No one is censoring you but I bet there's a lot of people out there fighting to keep it that way that wouldn't mind neutralizing a few of you fucktards for jeopardizing their safety. Yeah, nothing says "wake up, sheeple" like irritating some secretaries at PayPal with your retarded actions. Good work, Chief. Way to stand up for Freedom!
Because Mainstream News organizations would never have publicly posted a list of vital US locations. That's why. You get into that territory; you are certainly entering the realm of Espionage. Don't think that's just relegated to citizens of the USA either.
First off.. companies are "persons." I suggest you find out what that word means as I don't think it means what you think it does.
Secondly... political discrimination is racial discrimination? Really? Do you even understand English?
Really? So because you believe it's an addiction you think it's OK to shut down that service by force?
I hadn't even thought of that; brilliant deduction.
So let's get this straight then.. what "emotion" do you want MasterCard to have in reaction to you causing them to directly lose money?
Fear, perhaps?
Because if you're looking for anything but you surely will not receive it.
I can assure you, it caused fear and it certainly is an act of terrorism. A petty, weak act, but terrorism, nonetheless.
Sorry.. what race of people did Wikileaks free from bondage?
I must have missed that.
DDoS == non-complicit nodes with only the master of the network responsible. Voluntary Botnet == complicit nodes with every node responsible.
Keep it up and you'll see the real difference.
You only believe in the freedom to be a douchebag to people you don't know. None of us fear your threats.
What's wrong with trying to stage a coup against a tyrant that explicitly threatens your nation, its citizens and its businesses? Nothing. I guess that's how you join the league of the "Wrong" people. I've never seen an industry in Canada threaten to destroy the US or capitalism; so maybe you're onto something.
"The People" are not your favourite little bands of South American thugs, believe it or not. The people are broader and what happens when the opposition movements in those countries flee? Whose productivity will "The People" leech off?
That's funny; why do they still let you speak then?
Right, like the Democratic elections that brought forth Hitler. Democracy is not magical. If people vote in leaders who aid a foreign government that has thousands of ICBM's targeting your city and has repeatedly threatened to "crush" you in some way or another, it's your responsibility, in defense of your nation, to act accordingly.
The Internet != ISPs?? REALLY. Wow that's news for me because I'm pretty sure that "The Internet" is in fact a collection of private networks dominated largely by ISPs. DNS being just a very popular service for the Internet. How you can't see that such a minute reason such as "Net Neutrality" as an excuse to regulate private networks seems to be justifiable for you.. National Security will trump that really quick. The logic being; if we can do this to enforce the way we believe the internet should run then why can't we do it to keep the nation safe (a drastically more important function of Government.) You open the gate and this is what comes next. If those private networks are not private anymore, look what happens to everything else in public life. It's a Boolean switch. Private or public. Not both. You're flipping the switch.
That's some real idealism you have there. In the land of Realism.. a pragmatic approach that has guided foreign policies for the past 70-80 years.. we deal with other nations in the best way that suits our interests. That doesn't mean it's corrupt to put pressure on or to make a deal. You're making a leap in logic.
That and the 1st amendment applies to citizens of the US. What will you do if a diplomatic spat due to these or future leaks cause a major war that wouldn't have happened otherwise? Don't presume it can't happen. These documents are secret for a reason and it's not to hide them from you. It's to hide them from the thin skinned diplomats on the other side of the table.
Good thing then most of Slashdot wants the US Government to take control of the Internet via the FCC. The FCC that censors the things it controls. Nothing could go wrong there! Just give me my diplomatic gossip and unrestricted torrents; I deserve them! /s
If the Government could censor it they would because it's their responsibility to safeguard information like that. So, you all go ahead and give them that power. See how it works out..
Maybe it's because you're foolish to let your prejudices guide you that you don't have a job. What nationalities do you think are often involved in analysis? Do you speak Arabic? Probably not, right?