Why is Mickey so special all of the sudden? It's just another work, that has payed off quite handsomely, and it's time for it to be transferred into the public domain. 10-20 years of copyright is more than enough.
Thank god we don't have that kind of nonsence. Faxed document is considered nothing more than a copy and will be viewed as such in court. As for secure document exchange — state endorsed digital signatures are the best thing our government has come up with in the last 10 years.
Summary is all wrong, for once government official said something, that made sence: "It is stupid and impossible to try and get the internet in compliance with outdated laws, that were creating when the tech available to us was barely imaginable." Oh, and it totally made sence pointing out that US is attempting to bring internet to compliance with US laws is retarded, as every country has it's laws, and, for example google and youtube are in violation of Russia's laws.
Sence of false security and common misconception. Wiretapping the phone line is not harder, than sniffing email traffic. So secure the damn emails instead of hoping the perpetrator who has the time to infiltrate your network has enough time to set up sniffer, but doesn't have time to put two wires into the phone line.
Google only blocks you Plus account. Mail and whatnot is still intact, unless you were spamming. Google has already commented on that. So how about reading up on the issue before panicking?
In another words: "Bend over and take it like a man". And what does this "price" have to do with convenience? The point here being is that this searches are serving no purpose. Except for making money for those providing the equipment.
Futhermore, he can successfully defend himself in court, so for the safety of the case they should shoot them where he stands, this is the only way to protect the freedom. Oh, wait
Oh, right, hardware is transmitting data not including OS in the process. And this totally escapes sniffers on the network people set up to see what's being transmitted. Another tinfoil hat technology in motion?
You're absurd. Read up on GSM standard and amounts of power needed to receive a signal, even more so, determine phone's location and send it back. Then open up a phone and take a good look at it. If you find a back-up battery big enough to provide power for that — let us know. Once the phone is off (and by "off" I mean OFF, not just screen turned off, then it is not operating. The only thing working is a clock chip. Pull the battery — nothing but the clock will be capable of operating. Police will gladly bug a phone, but that's entirely different topic for discussion.
Yes. But they are not too overzealous when it comes to dealing with tourists (who wants to start international scandal, when the poor bugger is of no threat). Should they be sure that you were using encryption to communicate with dissidents inside China, that would be a totally different story.
Yeah, it has protected those game makers from competition. And customers. That prefer to buy 20 games for 3 bucks each, than one for 60 bucks. That will turn out to be a load of bollocks in the end, despite all the advertising, and those, that have endorsed indie game developers and provided them with a platform to publich their games will benefit. DRM, vendor lock-ins and other poor attempts at denying the basic principles of the information — that it can be easily copied distributed and altered is as pathetic as if stable owners tried to demand that cars should not move faster that a horse, because otherwise it would provide unfair competition and infridge on their rights. I wonder when will those organisations stop trying to wage a war with their customers and will look for a way to benefit from the new technologies rather than try to cripple them.
Who cares if you steal it with one click or two? Geany is out of the bottle, people cat effectively get the content and redistribute it. You have to compete with that, forget about sky-high margins and benefit from providing people with cheap, convenient and high-quality content. The more you try to wage war with your customers — the higher chance is that you will win the battle for copyright and lose the war for customers.
Oh, come on, this h264 support from MS is outright a . Building windows media player into a browser Don't forget that it's not just for browsers to decide. Take youtube, if all content is provided in either WebM or in a Flash container — then noone will care for h264 support in browser. Especially through a layer of a buggy windows-media player plugin. Small players will hardly support paying per view of clips published on their sites or per each encoding. The choice is quite obvious, really.
Violationg the GPL is as good as pirating software. Which is not, as it has been pointed out, stealing. But isn't it Sony, that's trying to tell the world, that pirating is worse that stealing?
What would prevent them from delivering new features in versions 4.1, 4.2, etc? The changes are cosmetic and features are pretty comparable to those, that were introduced in minor versions in the 3 branch.
Get an home router or switch that supports IPv6. Other that that, make sure you are running an OS, that supports IPv6 (all Windowses since XP, pretty much all of modern linux distros, Mac Os X as well). So that you'll be ready. So far you cat try with teredo or any other IPv6 tunnel broker.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is Mickey so special all of the sudden? It's just another work, that has payed off quite handsomely, and it's time for it to be transferred into the public domain. 10-20 years of copyright is more than enough.
Google might not care about you, but as long as Google's actions benefit the society, I'm all for it.
Thank god we don't have that kind of nonsence. Faxed document is considered nothing more than a copy and will be viewed as such in court. As for secure document exchange — state endorsed digital signatures are the best thing our government has come up with in the last 10 years.
Summary is all wrong, for once government official said something, that made sence: "It is stupid and impossible to try and get the internet in compliance with outdated laws, that were creating when the tech available to us was barely imaginable." Oh, and it totally made sence pointing out that US is attempting to bring internet to compliance with US laws is retarded, as every country has it's laws, and, for example google and youtube are in violation of Russia's laws.
Sence of false security and common misconception. Wiretapping the phone line is not harder, than sniffing email traffic. So secure the damn emails instead of hoping the perpetrator who has the time to infiltrate your network has enough time to set up sniffer, but doesn't have time to put two wires into the phone line.
You can get a copy of the document to sign, but sending signed document back will only provide a copy for the recepient, which has very limited use.
How about email? Has been much more usefull and accessible than a fax and dates back to 1965.
Google only blocks you Plus account. Mail and whatnot is still intact, unless you were spamming. Google has already commented on that. So how about reading up on the issue before panicking?
It's not time to start ignoring the laws, it's time to start changing the laws.
In another words: "Bend over and take it like a man". And what does this "price" have to do with convenience? The point here being is that this searches are serving no purpose. Except for making money for those providing the equipment.
Wrong. Anyone with hands should not be allowed on a plane. Unless? of course, they are restrained and chained to their seat in a secure manner.
Yeah, grabbing each passenger by the balls is way more effective.
This "not" time you are referring to has been around for over 10 years. Yet noone has gotten even close to taking market share away from skype. So
Futhermore, he can successfully defend himself in court, so for the safety of the case they should shoot them where he stands, this is the only way to protect the freedom. Oh, wait
Oh, right, hardware is transmitting data not including OS in the process. And this totally escapes sniffers on the network people set up to see what's being transmitted. Another tinfoil hat technology in motion?
You're absurd. Read up on GSM standard and amounts of power needed to receive a signal, even more so, determine phone's location and send it back. Then open up a phone and take a good look at it. If you find a back-up battery big enough to provide power for that — let us know. Once the phone is off (and by "off" I mean OFF, not just screen turned off, then it is not operating. The only thing working is a clock chip. Pull the battery — nothing but the clock will be capable of operating.
Police will gladly bug a phone, but that's entirely different topic for discussion.
Yes. But they are not too overzealous when it comes to dealing with tourists (who wants to start international scandal, when the poor bugger is of no threat). Should they be sure that you were using encryption to communicate with dissidents inside China, that would be a totally different story.
Yeah, it has protected those game makers from competition. And customers. That prefer to buy 20 games for 3 bucks each, than one for 60 bucks. That will turn out to be a load of bollocks in the end, despite all the advertising, and those, that have endorsed indie game developers and provided them with a platform to publich their games will benefit. DRM, vendor lock-ins and other poor attempts at denying the basic principles of the information — that it can be easily copied distributed and altered is as pathetic as if stable owners tried to demand that cars should not move faster that a horse, because otherwise it would provide unfair competition and infridge on their rights.
I wonder when will those organisations stop trying to wage a war with their customers and will look for a way to benefit from the new technologies rather than try to cripple them.
Who cares if you steal it with one click or two? Geany is out of the bottle, people cat effectively get the content and redistribute it. You have to compete with that, forget about sky-high margins and benefit from providing people with cheap, convenient and high-quality content. The more you try to wage war with your customers — the higher chance is that you will win the battle for copyright and lose the war for customers.
Oh, come on, this h264 support from MS is outright a . Building windows media player into a browser Don't forget that it's not just for browsers to decide. Take youtube, if all content is provided in either WebM or in a Flash container — then noone will care for h264 support in browser. Especially through a layer of a buggy windows-media player plugin. Small players will hardly support paying per view of clips published on their sites or per each encoding. The choice is quite obvious, really.
Violationg the GPL is as good as pirating software. Which is not, as it has been pointed out, stealing. But isn't it Sony, that's trying to tell the world, that pirating is worse that stealing?
To prove that there was evidence deleted, you have to prove it existed in the first place.
What would prevent them from delivering new features in versions 4.1, 4.2, etc? The changes are cosmetic and features are pretty comparable to those, that were introduced in minor versions in the 3 branch.
Oh my god, did somebody just invent NAT?
Get an home router or switch that supports IPv6. Other that that, make sure you are running an OS, that supports IPv6 (all Windowses since XP, pretty much all of modern linux distros, Mac Os X as well). So that you'll be ready. So far you cat try with teredo or any other IPv6 tunnel broker.