Here is a crazy idea? why don't you just go talk to ARIN/CIDR and find out who owns what IPs? A 15-minute phone call or flooding ICMP across the internet.
I don't run linux, or have any systems with Linux installed, I have windows 98 on one machine for playing Diablo II and DVD's. I run FreeBSD/OpenBSD.
However at least no major linux distro had their HQ broken into twice in less than a month, and yes POD still renders almost all Win98 boxes to BSOD or just straight crashes. I think that has been fixed in Linux since kernel 1.3. Its good to know that microsoft puts pride in security, instead of hype and profits:) But for the rest of us out there who are sys admins and can look beyond happy little buttons and various other sundry amusements microsoft still falls way behind, especially when your livelyhood depends on it.
At least I had the balls to not post anonymous and call someone else out.
Let's see a company is abusing bandwidth for their own personal gain, causing heart ache to sys admins everywhere, gee isn't this a low layer equivalent of spamming?
BTW: I pay for my own bandwidth, they don't they shouldn't earn money of me without my consent, even if it is an ICMP or whatever they use packet.
The popular Western ethnocentric view of ones who do not confide by their view of normal behaviour as deviant or deprived is clearly shown by the vast majority of the public and social scientists. If one gains all social interaction from the net and meets there desires for social interaction by that medium, why oppress them by saying that they are being deprived of social interaction when they can fufill there needs by an alternative medium. I personnally hate most people I meet in public, since most I meet are egotistical assholes whom desire nothing but sports, drinking, and sex. While I desire and find mental stimulation in mathematics, programming, or generic logic problems of deductive reasoning. I find it difficult to attain my needs for social interaction through the common public so I persue other venues such as the Internet and occasional poetry reading at a coffee house to meet my needs. Since I do not go to parties or bars, am I deprived? I think if I was forced to go to parties bars, and other deficits of mental stimulation I would be truely depriving myself.
Milk does the body good unless you do not possess the ability to break down lactose and then you have bloody diahreahMarketing Ignorance Since 1800
Just disable any SYN/ACK and SYN from external sources which do not correspond to a preset state. Shouldn't that work? For ICMP DoS Attacks you can just dissable ICMP on all ports. Sure you can't conventionally ping anything, but instead you could write a little script that determines latency of HTTP object requests.
Just my $.02(USD) or $.03(AUSD)
When you buy something you own all of it, not just select pieces. Since it is yours it is yours to take care of recycling it or whatever you are going to do with it when it no longer functions to meet your desired means. Holding the company who created it responsible really makes no sense since it is no longer their property. I hold this under the same notion as DVD ownership, if you bought it you should be able to make a coaster out of it, nuke it in the microwave, or DeCSS it. BTW: You are also responsible for disposing of the DVD:)
It was just the general tone of the microsoft article on their site more or less insinuating that they have created this new mystical IPv6, or at least it has never been done on an MS platform when it has been done considerably before.
I wouldn't touch it though, it would really be snowing down there if it was GPL or BSD, but it isn't. Contributing to that would be like selling out to satan.
If I write a program it is an extension of myself, therefore much like good literature writing a program should be granted the same writes that are entitled under the first amendment.
BTW: Does anyone know the email address for the MPAA? I couldn't find one on their site
Hitachi has had out a 9x and NT 4.0 IPv6 protocol stack out for a while now, and it is free and works well. It's nice to see that 3rd parties can contribute greatly towards the MS platform just to have them poke out and claim that something they did is the first time it has ever been done on their OS. Realisticly though I don't think they will have a stable product till at least 2nd Qrt. 2001. But right now I have an IPv6 only sandbox running on a few FreeBSD 4.1 --STABLE and OpenBSD 2.7 systems thanks to KAME.
Couldn't you hack out a pseudo-driver to pull tcp emulation over the udp connection , i.e. encapsulating the pseudo-driver's tcp request and shooting it through the program sending the udp datagrams and providing some error control. Then just make sure that both sides have regular querying so it goes both way's? That way almost all programs out there could use it, albiet slow and you may have to play around with some timeout values but it should work. Maybe call it the fums0 pseudo device?
Has anyone actually seen the code? I mean does this software just pull packets of relays? Then if you encrypt your email via Kerberos or the like could they still pull it and crack it? I run my own SMTP and POP server so does this mean that I by some wacky juristriction am in violation of the law if I do not comply to their standards? Not to mention that this is internation traffic we are dealing with, due to Intelligence Oversight Laws, and the inherent domestic only role of the FBI, wouldn't this then be under the juristiction of the CIA?
I have two cans and some string if I talk over it then do I have to allow the FBI to tap it?
A CONTRARY RESULT WOULD MEAN THAT
CONTENT OWNERS WOULD NOT DARE TO MAKE THEIR WORKS
AVAILABLE FOR TRANSMISSION ON THE INTERNET. THIS WOULD
BE A GREAT LOSS TO THE PUBLIC INCLUDING THE ENTITIES AND
INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE SUBMITTED COMMENTS.(TIME WARNER)
Hmm... So if the protection of first sale is not preserved artists will no longer place mp3 or other digital content upon the internet? I would disagree, a great deal of unsigned bands out there already disperse content to allow for free viewing and continual dissemination which helps provide support and revenue by increased concert attendance.
Perhapse my point was not quite as specific as I would of liked it to be. The main focus is based upon the movement from companies to individuals towards individuals to individuals. An individual receives money from other individuals because the second party respects their work. This I believe propogates good old capitalism, compared to corporate bloat that appears to dominate the tyranical artistic community. Perhapse if a company likes an artist or endorses an artist, the artist could gain monetary success similar to today's "rock stars" but the works of the artist remain his or her own property, and should remain that way under something similar to the GPL. This would allow for individual artists to still freely distribute their music over any given medium without the parasitic RIAA/MPAA influence. Yet again if artists wouldn't "sell out" I don't think this would be such a big problem?
Has anyone noticed that all these MP3 IDs and running cypto through sound streams only aids the RIAA and the record companies not the actual artist. If an artist produced an MP3 and freely gave it away, however stating that if you like the music please give me some cash so I can make some more and afford some milk for my cereal. This would provide a much better means of directly giving the artist some cash because you like there work. However if the artist just wants to get rich, drink, and drive around in his or her BMW flipping of people, well then it doesn't work quite right. Quite honestly if I thought that my purpose down here was to make music I would simply do that instead of aspirations towards greed which seems to be common place. Hell maybe I'm just wrong but it's a free country.
I think this is an exellent move for big-blue, investing money in Linux, it is the best thing that they can be doing. It's alway's great to see a company pay back the community for what they have or will earn by using open source products. I just wish they open sources OS/2 and DB2.
So if I go to a concert with a recording device, copy the music to an mp3, then post a picture from the record on the site and make the mp3 freely available I would be a bootlegging counterfiting online pirate?
While some organizations use IP-based webhosting to, in part, justify their requests for IP space, ARIN will no longer accept IP-based hosting as justification for an allocation unless an exception is warranted
Virtual hosting maybe ok for general public web-pages, a.k.a. a step-up from geocities. But for people who provide web servicing to many different entities which all wish to have either SSH/FTP access to the web servers and SSL services this provides a problem. I currently provide services to only a few people but I plan to get a larger subnet within a year, the people I provide services for wish to have these services and in most cases the ability to do reverse lookup for security reasons. Being denied additional IP-space because of a reason such as web-hosting methods, seems to be slightly ludicrous.
I by even further means would be an astrophysicist, but if a blackhole had infinite mass let's say. Then any gain of gravity associated with it would be inconcievably small, as to have the 'pull' not to change over time.
"to be lost you must first be found, therefore you do not exist" (philosophical tech support)
I know this script has been bashed before but Napster is a medium of data exchange. It by itself is not actively seeking to traffic copyrighted material. On the same note ethernet, FDDI, etc. are mediums of data exchange why not sue cable, card, and all other forms of data exchanging equipment. Imagine how much illegal material has crossed on the average CAT-5 cable!
Slashdot Mirror
Copyright laws to Internet knowledge bases is as Ceasar to the Library of Alexandria.
Food for thought
Here is a crazy idea? why don't you just go talk to ARIN/CIDR and find out who owns what IPs? A 15-minute phone call or flooding ICMP across the internet.
People are all stupid, just some more than others
I don't run linux, or have any systems with Linux installed, I have windows 98 on one machine for playing Diablo II and DVD's. I run FreeBSD/OpenBSD.
:) But for the rest of us out there who are sys admins and can look beyond happy little buttons and various other sundry amusements microsoft still falls way behind, especially when your livelyhood depends on it.
However at least no major linux distro had their HQ broken into twice in less than a month, and yes POD still renders almost all Win98 boxes to BSOD or just straight crashes. I think that has been fixed in Linux since kernel 1.3. Its good to know that microsoft puts pride in security, instead of hype and profits
At least I had the balls to not post anonymous and call someone else out.
Let's see a company is abusing bandwidth for their own personal gain, causing heart ache to sys admins everywhere, gee isn't this a low layer equivalent of spamming?
BTW: I pay for my own bandwidth, they don't they shouldn't earn money of me without my consent, even if it is an ICMP or whatever they use packet.
EPOS --Evil Pissed-Off Sys admin
Does this mean that dear hunter will be ported to linux? oh yeah thats what we really want :(
Ode to the SSB (Sadistic Sardonic Bastard)
The popular Western ethnocentric view of ones who do not confide by their view of normal behaviour as deviant or deprived is clearly shown by the vast majority of the public and social scientists. If one gains all social interaction from the net and meets there desires for social interaction by that medium, why oppress them by saying that they are being deprived of social interaction when they can fufill there needs by an alternative medium. I personnally hate most people I meet in public, since most I meet are egotistical assholes whom desire nothing but sports, drinking, and sex. While I desire and find mental stimulation in mathematics, programming, or generic logic problems of deductive reasoning. I find it difficult to attain my needs for social interaction through the common public so I persue other venues such as the Internet and occasional poetry reading at a coffee house to meet my needs. Since I do not go to parties or bars, am I deprived? I think if I was forced to go to parties bars, and other deficits of mental stimulation I would be truely depriving myself.
Milk does the body good unless you do not possess the ability to break down lactose and then you have bloody diahreah Marketing Ignorance Since 1800
Time taken to disseminate an exploit world wide on IRC 2min.
Time taken to fix a security hole on an most BSD and Linux distros 10min-8hrs
Time taken to fix a security hole on a microsoft distro 1day - never
Just disable any SYN/ACK and SYN from external sources which do not correspond to a preset state. Shouldn't that work? For ICMP DoS Attacks you can just dissable ICMP on all ports. Sure you can't conventionally ping anything, but instead you could write a little script that determines latency of HTTP object requests. Just my $.02(USD) or $.03(AUSD)
When you buy something you own all of it, not just select pieces. Since it is yours it is yours to take care of recycling it or whatever you are going to do with it when it no longer functions to meet your desired means. Holding the company who created it responsible really makes no sense since it is no longer their property. I hold this under the same notion as DVD ownership, if you bought it you should be able to make a coaster out of it, nuke it in the microwave, or DeCSS it. BTW: You are also responsible for disposing of the DVD:)
It was just the general tone of the microsoft article on their site more or less insinuating that they have created this new mystical IPv6, or at least it has never been done on an MS platform when it has been done considerably before.
It's some hitachi software, but if you need some MS IPv6 here is your answer.
Hitachi's IPv6 Stuff
True though microsoft themselves are behind the bandwagon.
I wouldn't touch it though, it would really be snowing down there if it was GPL or BSD, but it isn't. Contributing to that would be like selling out to satan.
If I write a program it is an extension of myself, therefore much like good literature writing a program should be granted the same writes that are entitled under the first amendment.
BTW: Does anyone know the email address for the MPAA? I couldn't find one on their site
Hitachi has had out a 9x and NT 4.0 IPv6 protocol stack out for a while now, and it is free and works well. It's nice to see that 3rd parties can contribute greatly towards the MS platform just to have them poke out and claim that something they did is the first time it has ever been done on their OS. Realisticly though I don't think they will have a stable product till at least 2nd Qrt. 2001. But right now I have an IPv6 only sandbox running on a few FreeBSD 4.1 --STABLE and OpenBSD 2.7 systems thanks to KAME.
Couldn't you hack out a pseudo-driver to pull tcp emulation over the udp connection , i.e. encapsulating the pseudo-driver's tcp request and shooting it through the program sending the udp datagrams and providing some error control. Then just make sure that both sides have regular querying so it goes both way's? That way almost all programs out there could use it, albiet slow and you may have to play around with some timeout values but it should work. Maybe call it the fums0 pseudo device?
Has anyone actually seen the code? I mean does this software just pull packets of relays? Then if you encrypt your email via Kerberos or the like could they still pull it and crack it? I run my own SMTP and POP server so does this mean that I by some wacky juristriction am in violation of the law if I do not comply to their standards? Not to mention that this is internation traffic we are dealing with, due to Intelligence Oversight Laws, and the inherent domestic only role of the FBI, wouldn't this then be under the juristiction of the CIA?
I have two cans and some string if I talk over it then do I have to allow the FBI to tap it?
A CONTRARY RESULT WOULD MEAN THAT CONTENT OWNERS WOULD NOT DARE TO MAKE THEIR WORKS AVAILABLE FOR TRANSMISSION ON THE INTERNET. THIS WOULD BE A GREAT LOSS TO THE PUBLIC INCLUDING THE ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE SUBMITTED COMMENTS.(TIME WARNER)
Hmm... So if the protection of first sale is not preserved artists will no longer place mp3 or other digital content upon the internet? I would disagree, a great deal of unsigned bands out there already disperse content to allow for free viewing and continual dissemination which helps provide support and revenue by increased concert attendance.
not everyone wants to rape the consumer
Perhapse my point was not quite as specific as I would of liked it to be. The main focus is based upon the movement from companies to individuals towards individuals to individuals. An individual receives money from other individuals because the second party respects their work. This I believe propogates good old capitalism, compared to corporate bloat that appears to dominate the tyranical artistic community. Perhapse if a company likes an artist or endorses an artist, the artist could gain monetary success similar to today's "rock stars" but the works of the artist remain his or her own property, and should remain that way under something similar to the GPL. This would allow for individual artists to still freely distribute their music over any given medium without the parasitic RIAA/MPAA influence. Yet again if artists wouldn't "sell out" I don't think this would be such a big problem?
Has anyone noticed that all these MP3 IDs and running cypto through sound streams only aids the RIAA and the record companies not the actual artist. If an artist produced an MP3 and freely gave it away, however stating that if you like the music please give me some cash so I can make some more and afford some milk for my cereal. This would provide a much better means of directly giving the artist some cash because you like there work. However if the artist just wants to get rich, drink, and drive around in his or her BMW flipping of people, well then it doesn't work quite right. Quite honestly if I thought that my purpose down here was to make music I would simply do that instead of aspirations towards greed which seems to be common place. Hell maybe I'm just wrong but it's a free country.
Thanks for the time...
I think this is an exellent move for big-blue, investing money in Linux, it is the best thing that they can be doing. It's alway's great to see a company pay back the community for what they have or will earn by using open source products. I just wish they open sources OS/2 and DB2.
So if I go to a concert with a recording device, copy the music to an mp3, then post a picture from the record on the site and make the mp3 freely available I would be a bootlegging counterfiting online pirate?
While some organizations use IP-based webhosting to, in part, justify their requests for IP space, ARIN will no longer accept IP-based hosting as justification for an allocation unless an exception is warranted
Virtual hosting maybe ok for general public web-pages, a.k.a. a step-up from geocities. But for people who provide web servicing to many different entities which all wish to have either SSH/FTP access to the web servers and SSL services this provides a problem. I currently provide services to only a few people but I plan to get a larger subnet within a year, the people I provide services for wish to have these services and in most cases the ability to do reverse lookup for security reasons. Being denied additional IP-space because of a reason such as web-hosting methods, seems to be slightly ludicrous.
Sorry about that, apparently I was miss guided by myself. Perhapse I should go move to a neutron star somewhere :)
I by even further means would be an astrophysicist, but if a blackhole had infinite mass let's say. Then any gain of gravity associated with it would be inconcievably small, as to have the 'pull' not to change over time. "to be lost you must first be found, therefore you do not exist" (philosophical tech support)
I know this script has been bashed before but Napster is a medium of data exchange. It by itself is not actively seeking to traffic copyrighted material. On the same note ethernet, FDDI, etc. are mediums of data exchange why not sue cable, card, and all other forms of data exchanging equipment. Imagine how much illegal material has crossed on the average CAT-5 cable!