In the UK, requests, when issued by such bodies, usually come close enough to demands. Look at the UK govt's countless "voluntary" regulationary systems.
Would that be governmental representatives, representatives of an independent representational body of some sort, or a single bank/group's representative front? I'm unaware of the "UK Cards Association".
I was unable to locate the video in question, so I assume it's been taken down, and, sadly, and somewhat surprisingly, appears not to have been reuploaded.
As far as I know, "ax" is acceptable in American English, British English only permits "axe". I noticed TFA's inability to spell "hassled" in the headline far more.
On an unrelated note, I wonder whether they would have pressed charges were the employee in question to have disclosed the vulnerabilities only to the TSA. It's been done in the context of comp security, so I wouldn't be surprised at all to see it happen to someone reporting on physical security.
There's astounding variety in dyslogistics; humanity's capacity to insult extends far beyond the simple "x sucks", "y blows", and often enters far more explicit territory. What makes them think that "sucks" and "blows" are the preferred verbal weapon of the domain-registering masses? If anything, this will only cause a rise in popularity of other insulting verbs.
I agree with most of these; however, I'd revise #3 to refer to "a substantial API" and not the minimal, in terms of usefulness execrable, deposits of code provided by some software.
Shouldn't that be brand necromancy? Unless you're referring to the joyous tone of the article, in which case, yes, brand necrophilia would be the correct word.
In short, another magazine is using the name
on
BYTE Is Coming Back
·
· Score: 2
It's certainly nice to see the brand getting some use - too iconic a brand to let it go to waste - but this appears to be revival of the name and no more. Reading TFA, I can find only tenuous similarity between this and the original magazine; different focus, different target audience, by the chronological gap between this and the original, probably completely different staff - one might as well change "BYTE Is Coming Back" to "Another Magazine is Using the Name BYTE".
As an aside, I wonder how much they're going to have to pay for a domain like byte.com.
This and related observations and studies go further to explain why humanoid robots are often found strange and/or disconcerting than they do to explaining why animated films have failed; the reason for The Polar Express's failure is far more likely to have been generally poor animation and very competent competition. It's somewhat of a a pity that humanoid robots are as unlikely as they are to take off, outside of Japan and perhaps S. Korea, due to the difficulty at achieving a human-looking face; they'd be profitable, apart from anything else.
Slashdot Mirror
Not on that level of inviolability, no.
In the UK, requests, when issued by such bodies, usually come close enough to demands. Look at the UK govt's countless "voluntary" regulationary systems.
Would that be governmental representatives, representatives of an independent representational body of some sort, or a single bank/group's representative front? I'm unaware of the "UK Cards Association".
I was unable to locate the video in question, so I assume it's been taken down, and, sadly, and somewhat surprisingly, appears not to have been reuploaded.
As far as I know, "ax" is acceptable in American English, British English only permits "axe". I noticed TFA's inability to spell "hassled" in the headline far more. On an unrelated note, I wonder whether they would have pressed charges were the employee in question to have disclosed the vulnerabilities only to the TSA. It's been done in the context of comp security, so I wouldn't be surprised at all to see it happen to someone reporting on physical security.
No, I don't believe that BoA has a support sty to rant in, at or with, whatever a support sty may be.
There's astounding variety in dyslogistics; humanity's capacity to insult extends far beyond the simple "x sucks", "y blows", and often enters far more explicit territory. What makes them think that "sucks" and "blows" are the preferred verbal weapon of the domain-registering masses? If anything, this will only cause a rise in popularity of other insulting verbs.
I agree with most of these; however, I'd revise #3 to refer to "a substantial API" and not the minimal, in terms of usefulness execrable, deposits of code provided by some software.
brand necrophilia
Shouldn't that be brand necromancy? Unless you're referring to the joyous tone of the article, in which case, yes, brand necrophilia would be the correct word.
It's certainly nice to see the brand getting some use - too iconic a brand to let it go to waste - but this appears to be revival of the name and no more. Reading TFA, I can find only tenuous similarity between this and the original magazine; different focus, different target audience, by the chronological gap between this and the original, probably completely different staff - one might as well change "BYTE Is Coming Back" to "Another Magazine is Using the Name BYTE". As an aside, I wonder how much they're going to have to pay for a domain like byte.com.
This and related observations and studies go further to explain why humanoid robots are often found strange and/or disconcerting than they do to explaining why animated films have failed; the reason for The Polar Express's failure is far more likely to have been generally poor animation and very competent competition. It's somewhat of a a pity that humanoid robots are as unlikely as they are to take off, outside of Japan and perhaps S. Korea, due to the difficulty at achieving a human-looking face; they'd be profitable, apart from anything else.