In fact, in certain scenarios, including loading a large page comprising mixed text and graphics, Netscape 6.1 completed the job up to one-third faster than IE.
So me thinks this makes NS6.1 the preferred browser for watching porn pages;-)
Re:Okay so they live forever. Why can't other cell
on
The Immortal Cell
·
· Score: 1
ehm imagine all cells would divide indefinetely. your body would have shape nor size, muscles nor bones, ass nor brain, oh! the last thing doesn't really make a difference.
read the article, stay on topic
thank you
Actually, I very briefly spoke to a guy, who presented his work on annotating the genome in the EnsEMBL project after his presentation. The software they have written to control the tremendous logistics involved in "commenting" the genome is released under a BSD-style license (disclaimer: as I recall).
When I asked him why it wasn't released under the (L)GPL license, he said that the lawyers had declared the (L)GPL a "legal nightmare".
This put aside (I don't remember the exact arguments), I think the fact that these people release their software using the open-source principle should be acnowledged, therefore I thought I'd just mention it here on/. meneer de koepeer
i've heard of exons, but extrons are a totally new concept to me. tell me what are these special, human specific dna-elements called extrons. apparently an integral part of those dna element one refers to as genes.........
excuse my cynical comment, moderate me to -100 if you wish
thoughts, consiousness, amd the like are just concepts we humans made up. think about that for a while and your mind will dazzle.
nature vs. nurture is of course a very complicated thing. but i don't think it helps simplifying the argument by saying "well our genes are the same, why aren't we the same". the human genome is just a blueprint. imagine a large building, being built from a blueprint. imagine that happening again. can you honestly say that those two buildings will be exactly the same? no, therefore an identical twin will also not be exactly the same. but they do look alot alike.
do they think alike. most probably not completely, since they're in the same enviroment, and have to somehow find their own niche in that enviroment.
instead, try not to look at differences, but at similarities. although humans seem to behave in a very different way, their individuality arises from minor differences. in essence they are very similar.
so: 1.identical blueprints will not result in the same end product in a natural enviroment 2. humans are very much the same, and not so different as you might think!
Slashdot Mirror
From the CNET review:
;-)
In fact, in certain scenarios, including loading a large page comprising mixed text and graphics, Netscape 6.1 completed the job up to one-third faster than IE.
So me thinks this makes NS6.1 the preferred browser for watching porn pages
ehm imagine all cells would divide indefinetely. your body would have shape nor size, muscles nor bones, ass nor brain, oh! the last thing doesn't really make a difference. read the article, stay on topic thank you
i'm not sure, but i don't think that all the software you just mentioned is gpl-ed (as if it matters)
regards,
meneer de koekepeer
>Preferably with comments?
/.
Actually, I very briefly spoke to a guy, who presented his work on annotating the genome in the EnsEMBL project after his presentation. The software they have written to control the tremendous logistics involved in "commenting" the genome is released under a BSD-style license (disclaimer: as I recall).
When I asked him why it wasn't released under the (L)GPL license, he said that the lawyers had declared the (L)GPL a "legal nightmare".
This put aside (I don't remember the exact arguments), I think the fact that these people release their software using the open-source principle should be acnowledged, therefore I thought I'd just mention it here on
meneer de koepeer
Oh, you were attempting a joke? If not, you better explain what god (no caps) has to do with this. In my , not so humble, opinion this is off-topic.
i've heard of exons, but extrons are a totally new concept to me. tell me what are these special, human specific dna-elements called extrons. apparently an integral part of those dna element one refers to as genes.........
excuse my cynical comment, moderate me to -100 if you wish
meneer de koekepeer
thoughts, consiousness, amd the like are just concepts we humans made up. think about that for a while and your mind will dazzle.
nature vs. nurture is of course a very complicated thing. but i don't think it helps simplifying the argument by saying "well our genes are the same, why aren't we the same". the human genome is just a blueprint. imagine a large building, being built from a blueprint. imagine that happening again. can you honestly say that those two buildings will be exactly the same? no, therefore an identical twin will also not be exactly the same. but they do look alot alike.
do they think alike. most probably not completely, since they're in the same enviroment, and have to somehow find their own niche in that enviroment.
instead, try not to look at differences, but at similarities. although humans seem to behave in a very different way, their individuality arises from minor differences. in essence they are very similar.
so:
1.identical blueprints will not result in the same end product in a natural enviroment
2. humans are very much the same, and not so different as you might think!
ta,
meneer de koekepeer