As long as cops are not accountable for their actions and prosecutors have immunity we need guns. It is the only way to balance things out. Hitler and Stalin fist required a gun registry then they used the registry to confiscate the guns then well you know the rest. One group can not have all the power or they will use that power against those that disagree with them. Please note that I do not own any guns as I live in town and have no need for a gun (I have an air gun and a couple of bows ) and have children to young to be taught anything about gun safety. They will be getting their licence to buy guns as soon as they are old enough however if we still live in town there will be no guns in my house. If I want to shoot some targets I go to my dads in the country were it is reasonable to have guns. The whole problem is the pro-gun/anti-gun crowd are all a bunch of nut cases that have no brains just big mouths.
with there cellular customers. You get a phone call that you are paying to much on your phone bill and they need you permission to change your plan to cut you cost in half because you are a valuable customer (btw I own my own BB no contract). You say "hey awesome". next months statement your bill triples. You phone Bell and say "what the hell I want my old plan back" they say "sorry sir your old plan no longer exists but if you sign a new 3 year contract we will lower your bill to what it used to be". Bell does what ever they want in Canada and unless you live in a major city you have no options other than Telus and they do the same damn thing.
Why do they need guns? BTW cops don't shoot to wound (potential lawsuit) they shoot to kill. And you never explained why a civilised society with no guns need cops with guns. Google Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini they were very strong gun control advocates. What did they do after they took everyones guns away? THEY KILLED THEM.
The ammo box, in fact, is not a choice, and anyone who chooses to use it needs to be removed from said society. What about the war of 1812 are you saying the US gov is not a legitimate government? Should we not remove them from society?
They don't care about the lunatic fringe they care about the masses. The lunatic fringe is already unafraid/uncaring about government opinion. Any action against them makes them martyrs to themselves and others like them. No the government wants joe-shmoe so they can put the fear in the other joe's.
Who ever agreed to take it up the ass from the US government? I feel when the US gov or its members no longer commits crimes then they can start dealing with other peoples crimes until then STFU.
on the internet that says "buy this" you should be smarter. If some random dude on the street said "buy this" would you?
Killing people is not illegal ask the US Army in Afghanistan. How many civilian have they killed? Or are pirate lives worth more than civilian lives?
As long as cops are not accountable for their actions and prosecutors have immunity we need guns. It is the only way to balance things out. Hitler and Stalin fist required a gun registry then they used the registry to confiscate the guns then well you know the rest. One group can not have all the power or they will use that power against those that disagree with them.
Please note that I do not own any guns as I live in town and have no need for a gun (I have an air gun and a couple of bows ) and have children to young to be taught anything about gun safety. They will be getting their licence to buy guns as soon as they are old enough however if we still live in town there will be no guns in my house. If I want to shoot some targets I go to my dads in the country were it is reasonable to have guns.
The whole problem is the pro-gun/anti-gun crowd are all a bunch of nut cases that have no brains just big mouths.
with there cellular customers. You get a phone call that you are paying to much on your phone bill and they need you permission to change your plan to cut you cost in half because you are a valuable customer (btw I own my own BB no contract). You say "hey awesome". next months statement your bill triples. You phone Bell and say "what the hell I want my old plan back" they say "sorry sir your old plan no longer exists but if you sign a new 3 year contract we will lower your bill to what it used to be". Bell does what ever they want in Canada and unless you live in a major city you have no options other than Telus and they do the same damn thing.
Why do they need guns? BTW cops don't shoot to wound (potential lawsuit) they shoot to kill.
And you never explained why a civilised society with no guns need cops with guns.
Google Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini they were very strong gun control advocates. What did they do after they took everyones guns away? THEY KILLED THEM.
but that means all guns if civilians don't have guns why would police or military need them? Unless to kill unarmed people.
No all the AK-47 available for about $12 in Congo are/were legally owned guns at some point?
The ammo box, in fact, is not a choice, and anyone who chooses to use it needs to be removed from said society.
What about the war of 1812 are you saying the US gov is not a legitimate government? Should we not remove them from society?
If there were no weapons at home would cops need guns?
They don't care about the lunatic fringe they care about the masses. The lunatic fringe is already unafraid/uncaring about government opinion. Any action against them makes them martyrs to themselves and others like them. No the government wants joe-shmoe so they can put the fear in the other joe's.
Who ever agreed to take it up the ass from the US government? I feel when the US gov or its members no longer commits crimes then they can start dealing with other peoples crimes until then STFU.